Welcome to the RME club! You’ll never look back. They even support discontinued products from 20:years back

@johnsuggs7828

8 ай бұрын

For the amount of money they charge, they should come to your house to fix it

@Rockoslab

8 ай бұрын

​@@johnsuggs7828theyre stuff generally doesnt break. By support, he means that they write drivers for legacy products in perpetuity. Theyre are people usine 25 year old rme boxes. As far as price, It's actually a good value. You can pay more for less.

@scarvello

4 ай бұрын

@@johnsuggs7828exactly 😂

I was shocked when I compared the sound of my RME converters with my apollos. When I try to explain what good converters sound like to people, I tell them it's like going from 1080p to 4k resolution. I still use my apollo for tracking and use RME for my mixbus and monitoring.

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾

@chris-rb7bm

8 ай бұрын

id like to do this - can I please ask which rme do you use for the mixbus? I own the Aid-pro 2 FS R Black Edition and it's awesome for my headphones but wonder whether the UCX II is better for the mixbus and monitoring. :) RME!!!

@TachyonTheImmortal

8 ай бұрын

I use a ADI-2 DAC as a monitor controller connected w/a spdif cable to the apollo. Everything is clocked to my ADI-2 PRO, which I use for mixbus w/adat and everything runs through the apollo.

@kwameeyiah

8 ай бұрын

Had a similar experience when I went to 2 studios, one with an Apollo and the other with an RME. My mind was blown by the sound in the RME studio.

@chris-rb7bm

8 ай бұрын

@@TachyonTheImmortal Thanks :)

I switched from the Clarett+ series from Focusrite to the RME UCX II about 1 1/2 years ago. The first thing I noticed was the clarity of the interface. I didn't realize just how much difference I was hearing until I mixed my first song and put it on and compared the Clarett+ to the UCX II. The reproduction of the recorded tracks on the RME were simply spectacular. The Focusrite was good, but not in the same league as the UCX II. Glad you like it.

@audiolego

3 ай бұрын

I want to sell my Motu m4 for your RME. It has midi too. I gotta have midi.

You have a great voice for voice overs.

RME Low and Low Mid is crazy, an engineer that put me on many years ago, he said it was a secret that west coast mix engineers never shared

@puresoulg

8 ай бұрын

Wow

@GingerDrums

16 күн бұрын

RME is great, but this comment is just misleading. RME is known for being very neutral and transparent. There is no secret "bass and mids", especially if the A/D D/A nulls after 10 loop generations... It adds precisely *no* change in frequency response.

You slow to the game. I got my RME Fireface UCX 2013. This is the last interface you will ever need. Welcome to the club. 😎

@obliviox

Ай бұрын

Well arent you cool where should I send you your cookie?

I’ve been using the RME UCX (first version) for years! No crashes, solid updates, great support, the Total Mix has super in-depth for routing, mixing, creating templates for quick setup, etc. And because of the connections, it’s expandable! It’s sound quality is ultra clean, meaning it’s a clean slate for adding my own flavor and as you mentioned the “C” word, I have always taken advantage of the converters in the UCX rather than my MPC X SE and LIVE and have a familiar powerful workflow giving me the best of both worlds. Thanks Bolo for your great non conflict style content. I have used a few audio interfaces and sold them all for RME! My UCX has grown with me which is something I can’t say about other technology that can become obsolete. Good luck bro.

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

🔥

I had firewire 800 since 2008 to 2016 and never regret having it. Amazing built quality, sound quality and never had any issues with connection.

That’s crazy dude now you got me spinning my wheels! I’ve been watching those things for a hot minute! Since you did that one show with those cats and he had the RME & Neve set up… Yeah, bro that stuff right there is the real deal! Nice work, BOLO

Been on the cliff with RME for a while Bolo. Im so glad your the demonstrator, thamk you.

I had a similar 'wow experience' when I switched from Apollo X to the Neumann MT48. UAD needs to upgrade their Twins with High Quality converters soon if they want to remain competitive. It's the new trend.

@puresoulg

8 ай бұрын

Can you get the Twin Black-lion mod or modified with better converters and preamps

@puresoulg

8 ай бұрын

❓❓

@Tav_cr

8 ай бұрын

@@puresoulg I've heard about those mods but never tried them.

I loved your demo of this, great description 👍👍 Amazing 😅

Studied interfaces for a minute, glad I went with RME. I got the cheaper one, it's good. Total Mix took a minute to learn. However, that was helped by RME having some easy to follow set up videos on YT.

Just got the RME UCX II. Everything was fairly easy to set up. Great info. Cheers. 🔥🔥

RME writes all their own drivers etc. Solid especially for the price point, long run you will definitely be making an investment into your studio.

@Dispatcher813

8 ай бұрын

Does this interface have any problem with Mac . Can I just connect and play, or is this thing a hassle to recognize like a motu series.

@drindy5166

8 ай бұрын

@@Dispatcher813 google it. I don't use mac myself however, I can't see Mac being left out support wise as a lot of studios do run with mac OS.

@sburton84

8 ай бұрын

@@Dispatcher813 I don't have a Mac myself but I'd be surprised if you'd have any problems, I used to have a MOTU and, while I didn't have trouble with it being recognised by my PC, I did have a load of other issues with it; not had a single issue since switching to RME.

@tuneunleashed

8 ай бұрын

@@Dispatcher813Nah it’s great on Mac and PC. It’s smooth

Got mine, yesterday. Might hook it up this weekend. Gonna hang on to my Apollo for now, but looking forward to trying my RME after the installation's done. Thanks for the recommend!

Good job Bro as always ,Ive had my eyes on this ,Thanks to you I'm on it ....definitely....Salute Boss

I bought my RME Hdspe AIO back in 2008... it was in a Windows PC for years and now in a Mac Pro for 4 years an it works and works... awesome quality :)

Thanks. Definitely having issues with my Apollo and was gonna rebuy but I may cop this right now.

That’s why people rock with ya no favoritism and willing to make changes as seen fit regardless of the masses

I have that UCX II. My old still working RME Fireface 800 is in the attic. I bought it in 2006, and they still update drivers for it. I will probably stick to RME for the rest of my life.

the babyface RME is still amazing convervsion too, with all the cables and highly transportable. I even run my DJ controller through it because it sounds SO much better than in standalone. RME bringing it..

RME changed a lot for me. I literally lived in an apartment with "dirty electricity"-- a lot of noise was introduced to my audio signals. Once I upgraded to an RME interface, all that noise went away.

Hi, just switch. I bought the fireface 800 in 2007 and it still rocks. RME has a great ecosystem. 2 others you should look at are Antelope and Steinberg that is a true 32bit 384khz. Continued success.

100% correct I made the mistake of buying an Apollo because so many people say that they are better however I used to have an old RME fire face and I couldn’t believe that the old RME just sounds better in your ears it’s the preamps and the converters gives such a wide open sound you feel the space it’s very hard to explain until you try one so R M E all the way

Good stuff, thanks 👍🏾

I got the UCX III this year. Also grabbed a Neve Shelford channel for some color. Perfect combo

Glad I aint the only one haha! The cables had me trippin too! And yes, the conversion on synths made a bigger difference than I realized it would.

YEP!!! I still keep around Two outdated Fireface 800's and now I'm on to the Fireface UFX III. Rock solid drivers and sound!! Totalmix is amazing software once you get your head wrapped around it!! RME 4 Life!!!

RME is LEGIT!! Rock steady software too!

I've never tried an RME interface and I'm pretty sure they're good. I've heard/read nothing but good things about them. However, they are very expensive, just like most other higher-end gear. I have a lot of hardware synthesizers and drum machines with lots of outputs and I like to plug everything into the interface at once and track it all out whenever I'm ready using my two MOTU 24ai interfaces, each of which offer 24 analog inputs and 3 sets of ADAT I/O connections offering an additional 24 channels of ins and 24 outs if I want to expand with an external ADAT D/A or A/D converters. Also this system is expandable and networkable via AVB and it also has onboard DSP mixer and processing as well as work in standalone mode without a computer. With that said, I'm very happy with the sound quality of the MOTUs. Obtaining a comparable system like this using RME interfaces would be insanely expensive.

I sold my Apollo blkface a few years back and went with RME/BURL-BAD. It felt like a thin blanket came off my speakers. I still got and run all my Apollo plug-in with the satellite.

@BoloDaProducer

7 ай бұрын

Dope!!!

RME is a sleeper. Purchased a RME800 years ago and it is amazing. Tried the Apollo, for plugin bundle etc..and it just doesn't compare to RME converters or rich round presence for vocals.

@BoloDaProducer

7 ай бұрын

💪🏾

Please keep us posted Bolo! thx

Yep... Enjoying my UFX III...

Bolo salute on making this video. I been wanting an RME audio interface for at least a decade. I had the bread to get it 10X over and still I went with others. My current interface, is the reason I’m finally going to pull the trigger on the UFC II. I currently have the Focusrite 18i8 Gen III. Great interface WHEN USING THE FRONT INPUT JACKS. TERRIBLE INTERFACE WHEN USING THE BACK INPUTS. (Yeah I’m shouting) I didn’t discover the fixed -18db inputs, until I wanted to hook up my MPC X using all the outputs. Of course I looked on line to see if I was bugging out. Yup other people were complaining about it as well. Anyway, I have watched countless videos on UFC II and watched how to use Total Mix. After seeing you talk about the UFC II. Yeah, it’s time. ✌🏾

Yessir! RME is the truth.

All those cables and i/o make it backwards compatible - I like that!

RME all day long! Their is No comparison ! Appreciate your good work !

Bolo, you got it. Anything you touch sells . I be damn if these units are not in stock on zzounds until next month.

RME is the move. You'll have a rock solid interface for the next decade

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

It’s dope so far

RME UFX for 10+ years....its a Masterpiece✅✅✅ ....next up, RME ADI Pro Totalmix seems difficult at first but if you learn it, its fire!

I have the RME ADI-2 PRO FS Black Edition DAC. What sets this device apart is the headphone amp converters are as good as the outputs. And crossfeed is built in for a simulated binaural listening experience.

@chris-rb7bm

8 ай бұрын

I also own the Black edition ADI Pro 2 FS R BE. Do you think for mixbus and monitoring the UCXII would sound better than the Adi Pro 2 FS R BE? I am trying to work out my setup.

@coldskoolbeatz

8 ай бұрын

@@chris-rb7bm ionno...🤔 I never heard the other device. As I stated, I've only heard the RME through headphones, which is why I bought it. If I was mixing through a pair of monitors, I'd probably wouldn't own the ADI-2 Pro FS. The converters on the Lyra are A1, just not coming from the headphone amp.

@coldskoolbeatz

8 ай бұрын

@chris-rb7bm If I had to guess, I'd think the ADI-2 pro would sound better since it's a dedicated unit. The only reason I'd see you wanting the UCX II would be for the preamps if you plan on recording.

@chris-rb7bm

8 ай бұрын

@@coldskoolbeatz thanks for the advise. :) I will use my black edition BE then :))

Your content resonates globally! -- "Success is an ongoing, ever--evolving journey."

I use a Babyface Pro FS and Digiface USB. Cant go back.

I have been thinking about getting the RME adi-2 fs as an external convertor....this video confirms that I need to gone head and grab it

I have been using rme for a bit, i have the ufx 3. I have never had much of a problem with it except just learning all its features. Sounds great too, not changing anytime soon...but motu is the poor mans rme. Had the chance to check out one of my ppls monitor 8 and was impressed with its abilities and sound quality. Not quite rme(to me) but for the $$ u can build a very nice studio network (pro quality) for alot less than most ppl think. The ess sabre 32 converters are top notch, close to the rme.

The first audio interface I had was an RME and it was phenomenal - it's on my list to go again. I'd recommend anything from them. Always 5 * Speaking of companies who should be 5*'s but aint... where the FK is MPC 3.0

I might have to check it out. I’ve been using antelope audio which is pretty awesome

Apogee has great conversion too. However I like the idea of RME supporting older legacy units. I have an apogee element 24 with xlr output that’s great. Would love to see how it compares to the RME.

I have the original rme ucx; never looked back. The II looks nice but I’m good. My OG UCX produces fantastic sound.

You should try the RME ADI-2 DAC. It will blow your mind.

I have the RME UFX III and love it. It is better than the UA Apollo stuff and it has DSP onboard with Total Mix

interesting topic, been using three sound cards for the past 5 ish years. my system is comprised of a prism sound Orpheus a rme digiface usb and a behringer 8200. each of them has their strengths and weakness. when I want to record critical recordings I always go for the Orpheus as a master clock and it sounds rich and clear by that I mean that it's not even there. a good sound card should not affect the sound. here is where the RME comes in.....it's the total mix Matrix! having routing anything to anywhere is fantastic. the behringer 8200 is just for the 8 ins and outs

@coldskoolbeatz

8 ай бұрын

I have a similar setup where I'm using the Lyra 1for recording, and the RME ADR-2 Pro FS for mixing/mastering.

Yeah , im thinking of upgrading from my focusrite solo 2gen to the rme Babyface

I'm on a hunt for a new Interface myself... I currently have the Steinberg UR 22MMKII , Going on about maybe 6 years with it .

Hey Bolo, you can keep your existing setup (which I assume is the Apollo) and use ADAT Out of the Apollo into the ADAT In of the UCX II, which will help in adding extra channels, but you still get that DSP Power of UA.

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

True!

@algodley6099

8 ай бұрын

When you do that, which converters are you using with that setup? The Apollo or the UCX II?

@jacksp8de

8 ай бұрын

@@algodley6099 I believe you’re using the A to D of the Apollo.

@ablesam

8 ай бұрын

@@algodley6099 The signal comes in through the Apollo (mic/line/inst inputs) and is converted to digital within the Apollo. You can then choose to add UAD Plugins as you see fit on each of the inputs. Then route those channels out of the Apollo via ADAT Out (which is digital), which is then received by the UCX II.

@EricJohnson-fh8zj

8 ай бұрын

​@algodley6099 that's what I was thinking. In that set up (the UAD being the master and the RME being slave), wouldn't you be tracking into the AD converters with the RME, and then listening back on the Apollo DA converters on playback anyways? And be losing out the better RME D-to-A conversion, where the difference would be most noticeable? Seems like it would defeat the purpose, because the AD conversion of the Apollo is more than sufficient for a clean input recording signal. It's the outgoing DA from the RME where you're going to notice the biggest difference. But honestly, none of it doesn't makes THAT much of a difference anyways, EXCEPT in the quality of the headphone output of the RME. In reality the outgoing DA makes no difference in the final mix because what comes out of the DAW just is what it is. Interfaces have come such a long way that Scarlett solo has more than enough pre-amp and conversion quality to record a pro level production....and no consumers are out there listening back on a RME interface lol. The end consumer will NEVER notice that last 5% of a difference in Audio quality that a pro level interface brings. Stop worrying about that last 4 or 5% in conversion quality....and start recording good music lol. Remember people...a lot of our favorite albums were recorded on equipment far inferior to what we can buy now for just a couple hundred dollars and set up in our bedrooms!

Great callout on the drivers. They are among the best in the business. Also good call out for the class compliant / MPC application. For those who don’t know what Bolo is talking about, you can hook a class compliant audio interface into some modern Akai MPCs for extra outs and ins. Really crucial for those who want individual outs for drums (in like a tracking situation.) All around a great review! No BS and right to the point. P.S. I think TotalMix will let you run more than one interface in a system if you want to expand later. The caveat here is I think they both need to be using the same connection type (e.g. USB).

RME been fire SINCE EARLY 2000s

Banger Alert!!! Game Changer, this changes everything, will never be the same, Revolutionary Breakthrough, Mind-Blowing Discovery.....

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

Hey… I didn’t know…lol. Glad someone told me.. now I’m sold on it! 🤣💪🏾

@TheB1gduk

8 ай бұрын

Until the new model is so much better … every freakin year. Then you do an x vs y 10 years later and realise nothing has really changed,

Definitely planning on grabbing one myself, please do a follow up..

Hi, UCX user here. The only 3 things I would change are: 1- an extra headphone output (come on, for the price we pay they could add it). 2- some physical buttons straight on the audio interface for cut, dim, talkback, mono, phase...like Audient ID44 or Apollo do (not comparing the quality) but the ease of use. And 3- Totalmix software is powerfull when you learn how to use but it takes time. Software like UAD or even Audient I found more friendly. What you think Bolo?

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

I can agree!

@miltonfostersound

8 ай бұрын

The RME ARC USB controller adds a lot of the functionality (and more) based on your second point. The macro actions you can program within TotalMix when paired with the ARC are pretty extensive, and if you’re not using the Durec port for recording, then it plugs straight into the interface. Look into it. There’s also the option of Total Mix Remote for iOS which is a touchscreen remote control app for all Total Mix capable devices (turning your interface into a pseudo digital mixer).

@laserjakk3629

8 ай бұрын

​​@@miltonfostersound I saw your good intention on your comment, but for me is a bit pointless pay extra $200,00 for a device when you already paid 1700. In my vision I only keep RME because it's very solid in terms of quality in all aspects (Round Trip Latency, Drivers, converters, etc). But in terms of ease use, they lack the items that I mentioned in my comment before. I think they should release an interface for home studio, same internal quality, less I/Os and more functions/buttons straight on the interface, like audient id24, and for the totalmix, they really should do a revision it's to much complicated, specially for home studio producers.

Sure it sounds great and cool features n all, but I think the most important, #1 thing is, stability. RME is ROCK SOLID. For reasons others have mentioned. (Older UCX Fireface)

I said this a bunch of times this is the best mistake I've ever made as far as music equipment goes. When I first got back into music 2 years ago I was looking every body with the Apollo but I have an m1 Mac and it didn't support Apollo yet. RME did.. thing is amazing sounding with a clarity, It's very flexible and routing both hardware.ios and internal And the best part about it is the support. They support their products for almost 20 years after purchase with updates. It's kind of pricey but not the most expensive and performance for price is stellar.... And the Babyface is just as good just portable. The conversion is the same. I have both.... The only thing They need to do is step up there advertisement. Lot of people don't know about these

I gotta lot to learn but … I’m learning … and UAD. Ain’t it … that’s for the high quality basic recording … gon head n get u smthin that gon change that top 5% of ur mix … def matters

RME is the truth

What are the connections to run in it class compliant mode for the MPC, just regular 1/4 to RCA cables?

and you can rack it to 19" had my eyes on this

I am not surprised. RME has the best converters, the best drivers and it always works. No one buying RME has ever changed his mind

Excellent review. Much appreciate it. Would love your opinion. I own an Apollo X8 and now going through the “bug’ of even considering swapping out my X8 for the RME reviewed here. Would appreciate any opinions and advice.

Yea thy are the best

You’ve been asleep for too long you’ve been in the matrix..It’s about time!WELCOME TO THE RME CLUB

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

I’ve been awakened 🤣🔥💪🏾

Good vid, but I definitely want hear a shootout! Apollo vs Scarlet vs RME hell, throw in the Tascam mixer too.

@puresoulg

8 ай бұрын

I know Right

This is dope! ... Sends it back lol

THE Interface is Dope

A no brainer RME UFX lll Sold the antelope Orion synergy core. No looking back the RME is it!

Your camera wasn’t ready for the power of RME.

FYI though, the Apollo X16 converters aren't the same as the other X series units. The X16 converters are actually one of the best in the industry, if not "The Best" in Analog conversion.

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

I’ve heard… I got the 8 and X6 rack mount units. They are definitely solid, but for this to be $1600 and to sound this good is amazing🔥

@MadACeTeeMack

8 ай бұрын

@@BoloDaProducer No doubt 💯

The DSP EQ in RME Totalmix....🔥🔥🔥🔥

You can keep the RME as an audio interface, sell the UAD interface and buy a UAD Satellite instead just to run the plugin, best of both world. Not a good idea though if you really use those UAD plugin for recording.

I’d be interested to know how it compares to antelope audio interfaces

USB 2.0 is capable to transfer 88 audio channels with 24bit and a sample rate of 192 kHz. That's massive.

Have you compared it to apogee interface?

Been looking for an interface maybe ill give this a try

Dont be Skeptical about the Babyface Pro FS. Ive had the BF, BF Pro, and now the FS. I use it for AD on main Monitors, and as master clock source. I use the Digiface USB with 3 Presonus DP88's (Burr Brown Converters) for summing and interfacing with my patchbay of hardware. Also enables me to use the Baby Face Pro in CC mode with my MPC, and send 8 channels into my hardware, before patching the 8 channels into my DAW VIA the Digiface USB. Ive considered the UCX II, but ill wait for the next update first. The good thing is ill def be staying RME so my setup wont change at all. Just better quality. This set up also enables me to dump my entire DAW track load into my summing mixer VIA 3 DP88's with burr brown AD/DA.

@princegeorgemusic

3 ай бұрын

Is there a notable difference between Babyface(old) and BFP FS in terms of D to A and headphone amp quality?

@Crysco.mp3

3 ай бұрын

@@princegeorgemusic the Babyface pro FS, is superior to the Babyface pro, and the original Babyface, and almost every aspect. With that being said, if all I had was an original blue Babyface, I’m sure I could do whatever I needed to do. But yes, I did notice a greater degree of detail, switching to the Babyface pro FS from the Babyface Pro.

@princegeorgemusic

3 ай бұрын

@@Crysco.mp3 Thank you. Thinking of upgrading to FS frm babyface silver

Bolo get a Uad satellite and switch you can run the plug-ins that way

@BoloDaProducer

8 ай бұрын

I got the old thunderbolt 2 one sitting on the shelf. I might check it out. 💪🏾

If you don't need the bells and whistles then the ADI-2 FS is a better AD/DA device. I spoke to RME and ALL the ADI-2 are a step up in converter quality over All The rest. Then you have three ADI-2 models which have converters that are ALL the same. The difference is within the other features in the ADI-2 lineup. The ADI-2 is meant for Monitors and Mastering.

I was wondering when you would jump on the RME

How does it compare to the duet 3?

About to cop it. Upgrading from a scarlet 2 3rd gen. Is it a big difference in sound quality?

@BoloDaProducer

4 ай бұрын

I actually have both and personally RME is better but not by a lot

I’m there. I have Apollo right now but RME has kinda crept into my attention, and there appears to be a “lot” on offer, with expansion & support, plus I’ve got some nice analogue pre’s etc.. Let’s face it, at the end of the day, you’re always pushing for as close to perfection as you can get! I’ll bite the bullet, and either go native with the plugins or do a work around and keep and integrate the Apollo with all my UA (a lot), plugins. Looking at RME, they seem to be compatible with anything with all the expansive tech they’ve developed! Just too good to ignore!

@blvkqmusicgroup

3 ай бұрын

I had Apollo too. From 2014-2023. Once I got RME it was no comparison. Hands down the RME was light years ahead in sound quality n clarity (at least to my ears (20yrs exp)). I’m not going back to Apollo.

I am confused between buying an UAD x4 and RME UcxII I am running a M2 Max machine, please suggest me.

The RME UCX II does not work in Class Compliant mode with any of the new AKAI MPCs. After you put the RME IN Class Compliant Mode, sequence some beats and keep playing it, then start changing banks or jumping to different screen that is when the pops and clicks start. RME believes that the MPC just can not handle interface, remember in CC mode the RME takes over the USB protocol of Akai and it is one some firmware that is very basic. However it seems that RME BabyFace and Pro version do work in CC mode and you are able to use the ADAT in and out and there are no pops or clicks. Lastly I would ditch the entire Apollo system, the conversion is a joke, everyone knows it. RME latency is the best, and if you venture into PCIE cards, you will have the tightest system. RME user for over 15 years, converters do matter, Burl, Lavry, Mytek, Cransesong that is the name of the game. Let us know how it goes with the X SE. Also supposedly the X SE has Burr Brown converters but those are not your daddys Burr Brown that was in original MPCs. Do you thing with Akai men, let them know they need to change the converters or give us digital in and outs with word clock, it will be probably cheaper for them and make tons of people happy.

@SMsoundGG

8 ай бұрын

Please tell me if ucx ii will work via usb I have an amd computer and there is no thunderbolt input. Thank you in advance!

Yamaha dm3 as well

I’m sure they added the changes in price for all the cables.

Still can't decide if I wanna save up for this beast or get the babyface. One of the things I like about this is that I can use the outputs for cv for my eurorack synth setup, and I'd love to be able to modulate from Bitwig into my eurorack.

@beatsheik

8 ай бұрын

Get the ucx bro, you won't regret it

@hostilekeldon

8 ай бұрын

I had the Babyface and switched to the UCX, the Dynamics section in TotalMix and the DURec function are definitely worth it, I do live sessions and record them from the interface, no DAW. And meetings everyday for which gate and compression are key. I would definitely add the ARC USB thought, I is an essential add on.

LMAOOO!!! WELCOME TO RME GANG BOLO!!!!

@KeyfloMusic

8 ай бұрын

The babyface is good for road use., and to me, It has always been better than the Apogee Duet.

How does is compare to the Apogee Symphony?

Please tell me if ucx ii will work via usb I have an amd computer and there is no thunderbolt input. Thank you in advance!

@beatsheik

8 ай бұрын

Yes

Is it low latency like my Presonus Quantum Thunderbolt interface. Can I monitor realtime like Thunderbolt allows me to. That is the question!