Spectral Audio is one of my 3-4 favourite amplifiers brands in all audio industry. Simply stunning.

@ilcomendante

Жыл бұрын

Agreed. And which would be your others?

Spectral and Wilson ,a combination that always works well,super realistic sound.

@markeverestov2275

2 жыл бұрын

Неплохо, но есть лучше. Например топовые VTL

Have my W/A Sasha DAW's, Spectral Amp and Pre and MIT cables sounding wonderful..

Thank you :-)

My dream system!

i have only just discovered these speakers just the speaker cable i was shown was £5000 WOW

For the seriously well healed

Wilson Audio makes great speakers,but they're so far out of reach!!!

I would like to hear Blue Stahli or Celldweller on this system .

Amazing how at all these shows you only hear this type of music and hifi recordings. Why don't they demo everyday popular music.

@videosuperhighway7655

3 жыл бұрын

Because the high end market is about listening to hardware not music.

@jerryjohnson3801

2 жыл бұрын

because most the ppl that buy at this price level are older ppl. Most younger ppl put their money into PC, Game, cars

@Music_time82

2 жыл бұрын

Go buy a bose knob

@kidkong637

11 ай бұрын

So they can hear themselves think So they can hear each other talk

Could be my next speaker.

@PursuitPerfectSystem

2 жыл бұрын

wow nice Will

Who would dare get up in the middle of that song playing on those speakers 🤨

Wilson vs Magico please compare

Spectral audio is the only non Japanese brand that I would consider to own if not were for their out of my reach prices. right now there's a 260 stereo spectral power amp for sale ex-demo for a mere 17.000€😢, it did cost 26.000€ new. As I said, too much for me even lowering its price.

@bikemike1118

2 жыл бұрын

Why is this the only non Japanese brand you would buy if you could afford?

The harsh textures of the second track don't seem to justify listening to them on ultra expensive speakers. Big subwoofers and any good floorstanding speakers will do it.

@peter12266

Жыл бұрын

Agree.

Why is Spectral always demoed with Wilson. Do they have a clause or something? 🤔

Spectral dma280, dmc30ss, sda4000

@PursuitPerfectSystem

5 жыл бұрын

thank you, I couldn't find that info anywhere - appreciate it

@kraken-s

5 жыл бұрын

Pursuit Perfect System i asked them about spectral stack details. The system was among the best in the show.

Radka Tonneff, voice and Steve Dobrogosz on piano. First track. Crackheads cannot appreciate this.

Spectral amp?

@PursuitPerfectSystem

5 жыл бұрын

yes the spectral components are now listed in the video description

let me win the lottery so i can put these on the back patio and blare Creed to the neighborhood

My god, can't people stay still?

@BobbyDazzler888

6 ай бұрын

If only

The second track sounded much better. More music like this on high-end audio instead of those slappy boring tracks

Well in this video the sound of the system (first title) sounds very hollow to my ears.

My Quad 57s are much better on the first Radka Toneff track. They would blow up if presented with the second piece with that sort of power, lol.

@huskydogg7536

3 жыл бұрын

Lol, I was thinking the same with my 63s.

The piano did not sound good. What CD player was playing ?

Those look like a rip off of GNP Valkiries from the 70's!!! Which were designed by a cal-tek grad.

All these rich guys watch jamesbond movies they want to hear bass beatz

@okancan9522

4 жыл бұрын

Beautiful song very relaxing sound wilson bravissimo

Sounds kinda dull.

You're not playing music thinking the viewer is getting an impression of what it sounds like - are you?

@PursuitPerfectSystem

5 жыл бұрын

try watching a few more show videos see how different they all are and then maybe you will get a better idea of the quality of the recordings I do, obviously using a good playback system like some quality headphones and a good dac/head amp

@shaunpaxton1577

4 жыл бұрын

Man shut up

Why does the vendor always pick the most drab music to display their speakers? I must admit though the second song was alot better than the first.

@raadic5260

5 жыл бұрын

Because the goal of HiFi is to sound real.

@jeromejax8675

5 жыл бұрын

@@raadic5260 Well if that is the goal, then the first song sound real bad. So bad several people walked out of the room with the quickness.

@mayilefy

5 жыл бұрын

Pacific Rim main theme，very easy to sound good

@PursuitPerfectSystem

5 жыл бұрын

@@jeromejax8675 people always walk in and out of rooms - they go and see the many many many other rooms - that's not a reflection of anything they might have been there an hour or foolishly they judge too quickly

@PursuitPerfectSystem

5 жыл бұрын

@@mayilefy I think the opposite - its not a naturally nice or easy listen track with a lot of densely layered elements that can easily mush together

Look at all the grey hair in that room (what's left of it). There is no one in that room that can hear above 15KHz or below 40 Hz anyway. Youth is wasted on the young, audiophile gear on the old.

@JG-gg9wk

4 жыл бұрын

Your showing your age, Thread easy, you'll be there sooner than you think. Besides, kids not only couldn't afford gear like this, they couldn't appreciated it.

@jpdj2715

4 жыл бұрын

Frequency range, the way you use it shows a lot of ignorance. About human hearing. Most music is between two octaves below and three octaves above a piano's central A (440Hz). This gives a range of 110Hz to 3520Hz. Add an octave to either end and the range becomes 55Hz to 7040Hz. There are a couple things that can go below or above, but these are used very little. If this is the case, then why would we need more? Well, you need to answer two questions: 1) how come you can distinguish a flute from a clarinet from a cello when each of them plays a 440Hz note? And 2) how come you can place them somewhere in space, separately. The answer to #1 is that the ear and brain are not like a normal microphone. The inner ear has some 20,000 "microphones" that are tuned to a specific frequency and each of them feeds into a filter network. This enables us to filter out significant sounds from a noisy environment. It also enables us to recognize father or mother, horse or lion, flute or piano. Why are these all sounding different? Because each has another wave shape for the same 440Hz note. A transversal flute has a more or less perfect sine shape when a clarinet produces a block wave, whilst the cello produces a sine wave with two tiny spikes and a violin wave looks like chaos. The recognition follows learning as we grow older in that we store reference samples in our brain/memory and these are used to compare with later on. What does this have to do with frequency range? Well, if you need to reproduce a 1760Hz clarinet note, being a block wave, you need much higher bandwidth to do that precisely (study the theory of Fourier analysis here). Now the clarinet is accompanied by a piano, double bass, cello and maybe a singer and all of a sudden, using regular microphones and electronics, we need to add up those frequencies and wave shape complexities in order to make sure we do not change the clarinet into something that sounds like a transversal flute or saxophone (the latter has the clarinet mouthpiece and can come very close to a clarinet). Or, if the two tiny spikes on the cello's sine wave shift, we might not recognize its recording playback sound as a cello anymore. So, now imagine a large symphony orchestra. What bandwidth do you need for that? Yes, most electronic engineers are not aware of this and think in sine wave terms and by matching Ohm's Law and some components they can design and build nice kit. Does KOD mean something to you? With loudspeakers it becomes a nightmare as we need to turn the electrical signal into air vibrations. Bass notes need power and slower movements, when high frequencies need extreme agility. So typically, the electric signal is split into components for different drivers through a crossover filter. That filter is a nightmare as it has frequency dependent distortions (especially with capacitors in them). Then you drive different drivers but have to imagine from a clarinet bass note of, say, 110Hz the block wave now has been split in a roughly sine wave part going to your speaker's woofer and the other energy to midrange and tweeter in a 3-way speaker. This is easier in the digital domain, by the way, and with an active crossover to a multi-amp system where each driver in your speaker has its own amp (with their own damping). The nightmare is not over yet, as each driver's vibrations must arrive at your ear in a way that reproduces the original wave shape as closely as possible. To do this all a bit good is not expensive, but to do this perfect at all levels, today is still very expensive. So, the wave shape analysis in our brains as a way to recognize different sounds is limited to between 15Hz and 22kHz if we look at all of humans to find the extremes (because of the inner ear's properties and the amount of nanophones available). Men, generally bigger than women, can hear much less high and for all of us, when we grow older the young age limits shift to a narrower range. But the bandwidth needed to serve this frequency range well in music reproduction is higher. Then, if we accept that, the electronics safety margin is higher again. In short: to build a perfect 110Hz blockwave out of a loudspeaker, you need much more than that. Phase correct, or time aligned at all levels down to the listening ear. Change wave shape along the way and at some point sound becomes unrecognizable. Funnily, when we grow older, the pattern recognition becomes more difficult and understand-ability of sound is better when there are no phase (wave shape) faults. As to electronics and speakers, another problem is that it is very difficult to design and build electronics that does this all perfectly at very low volumes. The pattern (wave shape) recognition in the brain and its inherent comparison with stored samples is not very "latency" critical and - I believe - is done with nerves with normal synapses (neurotransmitter based). There are also electrical synapses in the brain and I imagine these are used (#2) to compare left to right in this process as we need low latency in this precision 'brain and survival' task. Finally, I believe some people may have more of a "hunter" brain that may have more sensitivity or inclination to find "sound stage" and clear audio more important than others. And whilst women have generally a wider hearing range than men, my observation is that they can easily identify differences between good and bad audio kit, but generally cannot be bothered less.

Im not surprised by the sound, its smoke like all exoteric hifi, not much better than a 6000€ speakers.

@PursuitPerfectSystem

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting comments if you attended the Munich High end show you would see thats really not the case some of the systems there give you a taste of the very high end but its only a taste as the show situation is massively limiting of the systems

100.000$ + for what reason?? Go by Klipsh with good cables and a good receivers and you see what amazing sound you hear!! And with the next 90.000$ + go holidays build a house or give the money in poor hungry family's!!