Why Was the Ethiopian Bible Banned?: Unveiling the Mystery
Unveil the mystery of why the Ethiopian Bible was banned in this groundbreaking revelation. Dive deep into our in-depth analysis as we explore the hidden chapters of this sacred text. The Ethiopian Bible, filled with forbidden stories and prophecies, has sparked controversies and captivated scholars for centuries. What makes this scripture so unique and why has it been shunned by mainstream Christianity?
Join us as we traverse through the hallowed halls of Ethiopia’s monolithic churches, uncovering the texts that defy conventional Christian canons. Discover the disturbing facts about the additional 22 books found in the Ethiopian Bible, including the enigmatic Book of Enoch and the Kebra Nagast's fascinating narratives. Prepare to be shocked by the geopolitical and colonial histories that have influenced the acceptance and rejection of these texts.
This video offers a riveting narrative that not only highlights the rich tradition and resilience of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church but also challenges the established narratives of religious history. As we unveil the truth, we invite you to delve into a world where ancient wisdom and modern scholarship converge, revealing a facet of Christianity that has remained isolated by both geography and politics.
Support our journey of discovery on Africa Infohub by donating via PayPal, and don’t forget to like, subscribe, and turn on post notifications for more nuanced perspectives on Africa's rich geopolitical landscape and international relations. Your engagement helps us bring more enlightening content just like this to you!
#AcademicStudy #ChristianTraditions #AncientObelisks #EuropeanInfluences #PoliticalAgendas
CHAPTERS:
0:00 - Forbidden Ethiopian Bible Introduction
0:50 - Origins of Ethiopian Christianity
4:15 - Challenging Established Religious Narratives
5:45 - Faith and Resilience in Ethiopia
6:33 - Diversity of Christian Traditions
Support our channel - PayPal: Discovery_Hub(at)outlook.com
Please take a moment to like and subscribe to Africa Infohub.
This presentation contains images that were used under the Creative Commons License.
For copyright matters relating to this channel, please contact us directly and we'll remove any video on request: Discovery_Hub(at)outlook.com
If you enjoyed the video SUBSCRIBE & TURN ON POST NOTIFICATIONS.
SUBSCRIBE: / @africainfohub
✅COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Africa lnfohub doesn't fully own some of the materials compiled in its videos. It belongs to people or organizations who ought to be respected. If used, it falls under the following provisions: Copyright disclaimer section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. "Fair use" is allowed for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarships, and research.
✅ If you are the owner of the materials used in this video, contact us, and we will follow your request immediately: Discovery_Hub(at)outlook.com
Пікірлер: 7
Thank you for watching and for your comment. If you enjoyed the video, please share it on social media. Support our channel by subscribing. Don't forget to check out our other presentations. SUBSCRIBE: kzread.info/dron/PlTCO2QH7CpKg9O1-w-Ciw.html
@DoWgHouse
18 күн бұрын
YOU ARE A LIAR.
This is an oversimplification of the Counsel of Nicaea that Constantine convened in 325 AD. There were really only two camps of diverging opinion--the Homoousions and the Arians. Their disagreements were NOT over books to be included in the Biblical canon. Their disagreements were over the physical/bodily reality of a separate Father and Son, united in purpose, and some other minor issues, like Easter. Granted, these were serious disagreements, but not quite the contentious affair that is suggested here, with every Church leader pushing for a separate, unique interpretation of doctrine. The Arians lost (most knew they were outnumbered and didn't even attend) and their ideas were declared heretical. The abstract, non-sensical document called the Nicene Creed was the result. Constantine wanted to unite the Church for political reasons. He didn't accept baptism into Christianity until a few months before his death. Oddly, he was baptized by an Arian bishop, in direct contradiction of decisions made by the Nicene council. Over-simplification is misinformation.
So this is a more accurate Christianity.