*_Well this didn't go well at least we know what to do with the new Israel State"_* - Britain 1948

@werock2002

4 жыл бұрын

Ancient Accounts - Animated History uk: derp

@SamAronow

4 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: the UN partition plan for Palestine was even weirder looking than the 1949 armistice boundary ended up being, envisioning two states divided entirely into seven mutual enclaves- that is, enclaves linked at quadripoints. You may not have heard of mutual enclaves before because they have never existed anywhere ever, but imagine if Baarle-Nassau/Hertog was blown up to the size of Belgium and somewhat simplified and you have some idea.

@icecold1805

4 жыл бұрын

@@SamAronow The thing is the UN never aimed at "two states", but rather, it had delivered strict orders for both sides to create a single government that would encompass both Palestinians and Israelis. The jigsaw puzzle you must have seen on maps wasn't really two separate states but the territories that would be localized for one or the other ethnicity. Yes, the idea was really bad, but it was a desperate attempt of the UN to try to save the situation. It was obvious that the only other alternative would be war, which happened, and systematic ethnic cleansing, which is still on-going. Sadly, little more than this proposal could be done by the UN. I mean, this was happening in the middle of the Cold War, with Europe still being rebuilt, the constant looming fear of a nuclear holocaust, tensions on the iron curtain, Berlin split, Mao's China, Korean war, Vietnam War... and a UN that was still not as powerful as it is today, it basically didn't have the power to go into the Palestine region and enforce this new government whether they liked it or not.

@connorholt8481

4 жыл бұрын

@The British ah they can call that bluff like once right?? Doesn't the U.K have like 67 nuclear missals or something??

@djemseyfi7416

4 жыл бұрын

@The British "Boris warned the world ..." lost me there mate

“Largely saw everyone under one category: Ours” so much more simpler...

@vigodrakken7916

4 жыл бұрын

Laughed so hard 🤣

@gregsmith1548

4 жыл бұрын

Lol I thought it was funny But to be fair, the British seemed pretty savvy about who was who in India. Gotta admit they were pretty adept at divide and rule

@garethharold3600

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it's really not true though. The administration of the Raj was obsessed with categorizing different groups in India, and assigning roles and traits to those groups. Most infamously with the idea of "criminal tribes", but also with the disproportionately high number of Sikhs in the army, who were seen by the British as more martial than other Indians.

@vyktorehon5995

3 жыл бұрын

LMAO

@georgiosioannispappas6311

3 жыл бұрын

9

Britain: I promise that the movement will be nonviolent under our watchful eye Also Britain: *Closes eyes*

@Wanderer628

3 жыл бұрын

They never promised that. Because India demanded that it be given independence before the partition, the responsibility of policing the partition was the responsibility of the Indian and Pakistani states.. Of course they did nothing and lost control but blamed the violence on Britain even though the British had no legal jurisdiction to flood the countries with the needed security forces to control such an event.

@olleani

3 жыл бұрын

@@Wanderer628 And they still blame the British. Facepalm. Sometimes it's no wonder why some countries stay underdeveloped for such a long time.

@olleani

3 жыл бұрын

@Mahesh M V U Black people? What are you even referring to? I'm not sure it's good idea to always see yourself as a victim since it will lead to complacency.

@pabslondon

3 жыл бұрын

@@Wanderer628 "Because India demanded that it be given independence before the partition" - India might have demanded it but that is not what happened. Pakistan gained independence the day before India. Therefore partition happened before India became independent

@suyashsingh4338

3 жыл бұрын

@@olleani Your Country will always tell their part of the story Why don't you get it We know it Our Grandparents have been through it

dancing through a bed of flowers will forever be my favourite part of any History Matters videos

@danand75

3 жыл бұрын

I want to like but it is 69

@danand75

3 жыл бұрын

Noice

Ireland and India: getting partitioned sucks. Africa: AMATEURS.

@MidgeCat

4 жыл бұрын

The Irish partition was justified though. It’s only the south and the IRA that aren’t happy with it

@Whitemoon193

4 жыл бұрын

Poland: tell me about it

@mariano98ify

4 жыл бұрын

Africa wasn´t a country before, a lot of them just live in tribes

@chillaxo9863

4 жыл бұрын

@@Whitemoon193 Germany: tell me about it

@chillaxo9863

4 жыл бұрын

@@mariano98ify Africa isn't a country

In short, religion and politics are complicated (especially when they overlap) and trying to find a simple solution rarely results in a simple outcome.

@_blank-_

Жыл бұрын

There was a simple solution: actual federalism with significant autonomy for Muslim states. Unfortunately, both sides refused to compromise.

@TheAnzamin

Жыл бұрын

Or we can wake up the fact that before effectively backstabbing the entire independence movement, muslims had no reasonable fear of being persecuted as the century since then has revealed. Take a look at all ethnic minorities and religions in the regions that became pakistan though.... Muslims were afraid of ethnic cleansing because they project..and ultimately it's what they did with the bits of land they were given. The west keeps trying to complicate something that really comes down to islamic extremism, as it so often unfortunately does in that region.

@nabeel8633

Жыл бұрын

I mean with almost 700 years of uninterrupted Islamic rule over the north of India Muslims had their rights well protected, when the british came and that period of Islamic rule ended Muslims found themselves oppressed at the hands of non Muslims (I.e. the British), it makes perfect sense that the VERY large Muslim minority (⅓ of all Muslims live in this region) would not be happy with more non Muslim rule and would want their own Muslim government(s)

@TheAnzamin

Жыл бұрын

@@nabeel8633 Given what the muslims did over those 700 years (it wasn't uninterrupted by any means though), they were projecting when they showed fear. There was certainly not a Muslim majority in all the northern region in that period either. They were afraid somebody would do to them what they did to others, in effect. A projection of values that made no sense given that the only power that matched them for their lust of ethnic cleansing were the british (another Abrahamic religion). It came down to religion and projection, not some reason fear of persecution post British-Raj. This is bourne out by the demographics of those who were shouting loudest. Rich, elitist muslims could not accept a sharing of power under any circumstance and drove the issue through the Muslim League. Which is why they were happy to negotiate for over a year with the British directly before publicly demanding their own state as a part of the formal negotiations.

@TheAnzamin

Жыл бұрын

@@_blank-_ this would never have worked because autonomy would have eventually lead to demands for islamic law, this would conflict with the federal state and independence would be back on the table. You cant compromise with batshit stupid, batshit stupid will always throw the agreement in the bin when it doesn't get everything it wants.

Strictly speaking, although partition was contemplated of both the Muslim and Hindu interests the 562 princes ultimately had the choice of joining either India, or Pakistan, or becoming independent. Therefore, it may have been possible to have a geographically unified country had the parties been able to work out their differences or through conquest

@average_rite

2 жыл бұрын

Those don't constitute the whole of India just some parts, and even if you thought your idea would suffice then take a look at kashmir the ruler wanted to be in india and disregarded the Hindu Muslim situation now it's the most militarized place in the world

@allftw2677

2 жыл бұрын

@@average_rite true

@tirghroub5817

2 жыл бұрын

India was created after Pakistan. The British empire was partitioned, not India. The British are the first people to unite that region

@kraeuscallaye8506

2 жыл бұрын

@@tirghroub5817 not really

@tirghroub5817

2 жыл бұрын

@@kraeuscallaye8506 yes really

"Britain for the British, as we used to say about India" _-Winston Churchill_

@andym9571

3 жыл бұрын

@Mahesh M V U blame the Japanese for that one

@raptorfromthe6ix833

3 жыл бұрын

@Mahesh M V U you are acting like the famine was man made

@raptorfromthe6ix833

3 жыл бұрын

@Mahesh M V U what did winston churchill do that affected the famine was he unsympathetic to the suffering yes but did he cause it deffintately no

@raptorfromthe6ix833

3 жыл бұрын

@Mahesh M V U why the fuck would winston churchill start a deliberate famine especially an area near the enemy

@ivanov1276

3 жыл бұрын

@@raptorfromthe6ix833 Churchill didn't start the famine, but he's blamed for it because he did little to nothing to stop it. Many military generals begged him to send food and supplies over and he did to a small extent, but it was poorly distributed and uncared for. They wanted the Indians to be fed should the Japanese invade Burma. Churchill simply didn't care and in fact blamed the Indians for reproducing too much. The famine was caused by several things. The British did not allow the Indians to produce their own food (Indians had to pay for British food) and they were forced to grow crops like Indigo on these lands. The famine was the fault of Britishers, not just Churchill.

Count Von Count: ONE country Ah Ah Ha TWO Countries: Ah Ah Ha

@BroadwayRonMexico

4 жыл бұрын

*Three countries. Bangladesh had an independence war against Pakistan a bit later

@matheuspinheiro4796

4 жыл бұрын

@@BroadwayRonMexico *Four countries Burma

@madhijz6846

4 жыл бұрын

Count von Count you plebian!

@BroadwayRonMexico

4 жыл бұрын

@@matheuspinheiro4796 Burma wasnt part of the Raj at the time of independence so I didn't count it

@damianrodriguez7165

4 жыл бұрын

@@madhijz6846 i humbly apologize for mistaking the true title of the Count, I'll change it

You're smart for not covering the Kashmir issue.

@sumitsingh7835

4 жыл бұрын

What about that?

@akshaykhatri1531

4 жыл бұрын

Initially he used not so correct map he used kashmir part pok part as pakistan's side

@akshaykhatri1531

4 жыл бұрын

@PakMan that portion is a undisputed land and he should have told that in the video

@akshaykhatri1531

4 жыл бұрын

@PakMan now i know why you are burning you must be from pakistan And now i won't spend my energy making you understand Coz i know you won't

@emp437

4 жыл бұрын

@@akshaykhatri1531 what's the problem. No Kashmiri wants to be a part of India. Why don't you just let the Kashmiris decide. If they want independence let them, if they want to join pakistan let them, if they wanna stay in inda fine by me. Just let them decide for themselves by holding free elections

when you seek a whole subcontinent for spice but end up still seasoning with salt and pepper

@gregorydiasmusic

3 жыл бұрын

woefully underrated comment

@bogregz

3 жыл бұрын

Pepper is native to Southeast Asia

@campfireeverything

3 жыл бұрын

absolutely an underrated comment

@bogregz

3 жыл бұрын

It doesn't even make sense lol

@advickprosankto

2 жыл бұрын

Lol

Short answer: Religon Long answer: Watch the video

This one felt overly abbreviated. Would have preferred to wait longer for a slightly more detailed/extended vid

@DukeDresari

4 жыл бұрын

I agree, this video really should have been one of those classic 10 minute long videos. Unfortunately he doesn't do those anymore.

@maxm8589

4 жыл бұрын

Totally agree, these short 3 minute videos just don’t go into enough detail

@mirzaahmed6589

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it just covered the what of partition, not the how and why.

@akash23494

4 жыл бұрын

@@mirzaahmed6589 it covered the why and how was very violent

@catscats50

4 жыл бұрын

Complete clash of cultures. Muslims can't live in the same country as other people so they need their own country except for Bradford. Hindus have a habit of burning women when their husbands die and the British have a habit of hanging men that burn women. Political correctness gone mad 😁

Such a complex topic deserves a longer video!

@bloodfiredrake7259

4 жыл бұрын

exactly

@hevnervals

4 жыл бұрын

Not interesting enough to merit a longer video.

@BallyBoy95

4 жыл бұрын

Not really, he got enough of it right for me to be happy. And I've spent years studying this and Indian history and politics in general. Most people add such bs to it, that I get frustrated.

@namankumar9478

4 жыл бұрын

He is a foreigner so for him to make such video is a big thing.

@SunitaSharma-hf1np

4 жыл бұрын

@@namankumar9478 That doesn't matter I also know about American Civil war and American revolution.

Bro, you're one of my absolute favorite KZread channels. I watch and rewatch your same damn vids over and over again because they're so absolutely dope. I'd watch an hour goddamn long video of yours if you made it (I know that'd be monumental lol). I WILL become a Patreon eventually, I promise. Much love from the US, mate.

"Partition? That's the last thing we would do" And then they partitioned and left, and it was the last thing they did.

@harunsuaidi7349

4 жыл бұрын

Well, being the last thing to do means it's on the list.

@tirghroub5817

2 жыл бұрын

India was created after Pakistan. The British empire was partitioned, not India. The British are the first people to unite that region

@salma-nw9fe

2 жыл бұрын

@@tirghroub5817 did you ever Heard of maurya Dynasty or Mughal Empire and many others empire who did it before ,😂😂😂😂 even in some dynasty Indonesia and many south east asian countries were part of india

@sevenoxia7199

2 жыл бұрын

@@salma-nw9fe as far as I know not all of India was owned by the Mughals or the Maurya’s.

@firaxolegirein9816

Жыл бұрын

@@sevenoxia7199 , even the British didn't take all of India, lol

What if India had been reverted back to its pre-colonial borders? Or what if all the princely states had each gained independence as a separate country? Or what if India had been divided along ethnic lines? Really, when you think about it, it’s incredible we even got an India as massive as we did in our time line when it could have been divided much much extensively.

@bloodfiredrake7259

4 жыл бұрын

Precolonial borders would mean bringing back countries with monarchies that no longer existed,and wouldn't exactly be better not considering the fact that india changed a lot during colonization.

@tasinal-hassan8268

4 жыл бұрын

What if we go back to the Mughal era? Oooh boy.

@attiepollard7847

4 жыл бұрын

Baseboarders would have been one big kluster fuck geopolitically

@RichardBrown7k

4 жыл бұрын

The individual states were as far as was possible self-governing

@Srankillerttt

4 жыл бұрын

@@tasinal-hassan8268 What if we go back to Maratha era ? Ohh boy.

"The Sykes-Picot Agreement", can you make a short documentary about it?

@John76125

4 жыл бұрын

yes its what the muslims think was against them yet they and muslim supporters keep defending iraq and syria to the end when it fact the only people who suffered and became a minority in this partition was the kurds

@John76125

4 жыл бұрын

Thanos The Tank Engine Arabs are the majority government in all these countries so they don’t have to suffer problems such as ethnic cleansing as they have done to the kurds...

@John76125

4 жыл бұрын

Thanos The Tank Engine if Arabs didn’t support Sykes picot they would leave Kurdish lands and stop being so supportive of Iraq and Syria, countries made by the west... that are not real only made 100 years ago... they can unite their lands I don’t care. Leave Kurdish territory, if your against Sykes picot...

@John76125

4 жыл бұрын

Thanos The Tank Engine if they want they can unify I don’t care but leave Kurdish lands autonomy is not enough. The right of a people is to have their own land, especially if they are big enough...

@eliasbujaas1981

4 жыл бұрын

@_jeff _ 😐

> Why was India Partitioned? Poland was like "First time?"

@Cjnw

3 жыл бұрын

Баттенбургская Партиция

@bhaveshkasera2533

2 жыл бұрын

LoL Poland was once disappeared from earth. It was eaten by nazis and Soviets

@Zarafin

2 жыл бұрын

@@bhaveshkasera2533 Poland was partitioned way more than once, look it up.

@yolemae6580

2 жыл бұрын

imagine comparing one ethnicity to an entire subcontinent of 2 billion that was already divided before the British

@Umamaahoe

Жыл бұрын

@@yolemae6580 they had more like 500 million when it was partitioned

This is the most underrated channel on KZread.

Well at least they didn't repeat that mistake in the middle east or Africa

@StevioGaming1

4 жыл бұрын

The borders of Africa and the Middle East were already established before the partition of India. So yeah, they had no idea this would happen

@bigman489

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah the Middle East being fucked led to the European migrant crisis. So Europe kinda did that to itself.

@MsSamian

4 жыл бұрын

Palestine and Israel

@therodyman700

4 жыл бұрын

@@bigman489 the undependence of the colonies led to the migrant crisis, you can't uplift stone age tribes then expect them to rule themselves fairly and know how to create an economy. it resulted in a bunch of shithole countries with shit economies which in turn resulted in gold seekers pretending to flee war entering Europe and aslong as government handouts are given to them they will never leave

@Essa5225

4 жыл бұрын

@@therodyman700 you don't see a migrant crisis happening instantly when de colonization happened so those people are indeed fleeing war and not pretending

Such an amazing channel, keep up the great work!

I love your channel keep up the great stuff

*sees third option* Well... I don’t think anyone told India or Pakistan about there being a third opinions... cause they pretty much used the Indian army to turn any “will be independent” vote into “thank you for joining”

@justsomeguy1695

2 жыл бұрын

Actually one state did technically take that option though only for a few decades i.e Sikkim later merged into India as a new state though

@thedishwasherakawomen8878

2 жыл бұрын

@@justsomeguy1695 the state of Hyderabad was forcefully anexxed to India

@abhinavsingh.92

2 жыл бұрын

@@justsomeguy1695 Sikkim wasn't a princely state under the British, but a separate country like Nepal and Bhutan.

@tackytaco8133

2 жыл бұрын

@@thedishwasherakawomen8878 The state of Hyderabad was an exception due to the fact that it was gaping hole in the country. It would have led to some strife in the future. That is why.

@thedishwasherakawomen8878

2 жыл бұрын

@@tackytaco8133 yeah I know , each and every inch of land is indian territory.india should take further steps in taking back land lost to Sri Lanka, Pakistan and china

0:59 It’s our India comrades

@xashmak1892

4 жыл бұрын

How ironic

@hoodclassicsofcalifornia

4 жыл бұрын

Communist jokes suck

@aussiestalin8123

4 жыл бұрын

Communist jokes are the best

@Ivan_Drago.

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah

@timmmahhhh

4 жыл бұрын

No wonder tRump loves you.

Your channel is great and you have considerable talent for making excellent history-related videos. But like others have mentioned, you need to go back to 10 minute videos, especially for topics as complex as India's partition. Your earlier videos on British history were OUTSTANDING (!!) in part because they were sufficiently long enough to cover the material well.

@tirghroub5817

2 жыл бұрын

India was created after Pakistan. The British empire was partitioned, not India. The British are the first people to unite that region

@ruttikdhakate98

Жыл бұрын

@@tirghroub5817 So?

@DefinitelyNattox

Жыл бұрын

The reason why he doesn’t do the 10 minute history videos anymore is because they were getting demonetized and was losing a good amount of his revenue.

@cursedtyrany8199

Жыл бұрын

@@tirghroub5817 mauryans ashoka and all other large empires left the chat

@taqiyyamevajayate2857

Жыл бұрын

It's because of Islam 😂 Dar ul harb and Dar ul islam

awesome thanks for putting in this work

Thank you so much, this was very helpful!

You need a sequel to explain Bangladesh.

@attiepollard7847

4 жыл бұрын

Not important

@RichardBrown7k

4 жыл бұрын

But he can't even pretend to blame the UK for that.

@sumitsingh7835

4 жыл бұрын

@@attiepollard7847 not important ??? East Pakistan became Bangladesh(a new nation) in 1971 after facing brutality, ethnic cleansing by Pakistan Army .

@joermnyc

3 жыл бұрын

Short answer, Pakistan really could not properly govern itself and East Pakistan. Long answer... I’ll go make tea.

@drharnsaft1005

3 жыл бұрын

Just another mass execution of intellectuals and crippling of a country.

England: Let us draw the borders for you! "Aw shit here we go again"

@kamanashiskar9203

3 жыл бұрын

England still loves drawing borders.

@andrei19238

2 жыл бұрын

Did you even watch the videp

@B3RyL

2 жыл бұрын

There's a three-step method to how modern borders in the most volatile, violent and explosive regions of the world have been drawn: 1. UK invades. 2. UK realizes it can't occupy the land half-a-world-away forever. 3. UK withdraws and arbitrarily decides who lives where and on what conditions with no regard for anyone's interest other than its own. It's the same story for America, India, Africa and pretty much anywhere the UK set foot, including Israel and Ireland. Almost every conflict post-WWII has erupted because of UK's willy-nilly approach to drawing borders.

@Fed_Express

2 жыл бұрын

In all honesty, the borders that were drawn by Radcliffe were pretty accurate given his time constraint. We can't blame him for the Kashmir issue. All things considered, his division of Punjab was as fair as it could get, under the circumstances. The only bone of contention was that Gurdaspur ended up being in India despite having a Muslim majority at the time. It proved to be very consequential because through Gurdaspur went the only road connecting mainland India to Kashmir at the time. Had India not been given Gurdaspur, it's entirely plausible that we would've lost Kashmir during 1948 or 1965 wars. Pakistan had all of the natural connectivity advantage over India during those times.

@MrVenona

Жыл бұрын

There were 5 people on the commission that drew the border. Only one was English. Two were from the Indian National Congress. And two were from the Muslim League. The people of British India could have whatever border they wanted if they didn't hate each other.

I'm an indian. You're dead wrong. they stopped us from being a single india cause they knew Our curry would be too strong

@mukund3338

3 жыл бұрын

@Bilal Ayub No India Today after partition of pakistan, Bangladesh & Afghanistan is still 70+% of what united would look and it is fairly able to rule very good with a vibrant democracy

@mukund3338

3 жыл бұрын

@Bilal Ayub But still more than half(75+%) of muslims who were supposed to go to pakistan & bangladesh stayed in India which shows that they were quite assured of Hindus, that they won't do anything wrong and the results are now India has a higher Muslim population than Pakistan or Bangladesh or Afghanistan since their growth rate has been significantly higher than Hindus from start of the new beginning for India which is Indian freedom Which also shows that cracks were not that deep during partition And it was just a mere speculation of Jinnah who launched direct action day to brutally kill Hindus in response for not allowing partition and he succeeded becouse by this Gandhi ji and INC fearing that it can lead to civil war And Jinnah was ready to remain united if he would be made the First PRIME MINISTER of INDIA to which Nehru ji didn't agree as he wanted to be PM So this shows that India was divided because of Jinnah's personal GREED to become prime minister

@keralanaturelover196

3 жыл бұрын

@@mukund3338 u need to learn. Now south india majority want freedom from india like stalin kamal Hassan vaiko seeman and autonomy like chandrababu naidu siddaraya ponarayi etc.

@himanshubhushan4791

3 жыл бұрын

@@keralanaturelover196 You and your political parties want independence want independence. Just go and ssk a normal Tamiz, Kannadiga, Malayali or Telgu. You will get real answer. And moreover India and Pakistan are two hostile neighbours. Indians don't want another two hostile countries in the subcontinent.

@kannadiga_0225

3 жыл бұрын

@@keralanaturelover196 oh really Muslim ?

Most borders took many centuries of warfare to semi-settle. The British tried to circumvent that in their former empire and were only slightly successful

Hey History Matters, love your content. Think you can do a video/small series on the Bosnian war? Would really love to learn more about it!

Thanks for keeping the good work

@anonymous9656

4 жыл бұрын

Is that a extra history reference (your username) ? By golly it is

@EsamforMEMES

4 жыл бұрын

@@anonymous9656 I guess so

Nice 3 minute breakdown. yay 🙌

Video is accurate and very well researched

I would love to see a longer more detailed version of this.

You really need to make a second part to this

Can we have a video about the Sino-Soviet Split? I love your videos, by the way. (Especially the deadpan humor and death thumps. :D) Keep up the good work.

@korzen_h

Жыл бұрын

It already exists

"promised that it would be nonviolent" r/agedlikemilk

@annoyedbrox4851

2 жыл бұрын

lol best one

I thought I was going to witness him saying "Jawaharlal Nehru"

@pavan923

4 жыл бұрын

Sends shivers down my spine

@dafeels3085

3 жыл бұрын

as a Indian even I can't say it right

@knowledgedesk1653

3 жыл бұрын

And Gandhi

@knowledgedesk1653

3 жыл бұрын

All problems in India are caused by "Nehru". Now covid 19 outbreak is also due to "Nehru".

@criscrosxxx

2 жыл бұрын

@@dafeels3085 leh . Inna easy na pandit da . Aukha kithe e

Britain: hey we get tea from there they can all be one

@athish-REAL

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@owltea2252

4 жыл бұрын

Tea, the cause and solution to many of life's problems. Also hello

4 жыл бұрын

so much for divide and conquer. the uk is responsible for uniting the Hindu people into one state. before that they all lived in small kingdoms.

@Fat_Paws

4 жыл бұрын

Little did they know it would be Chicken Tikka Masala and not Tea that would become the unofficial food of Britain.

Always love these short simple cartoons. Not 100% accurate but entertaining 😅😅

I have never heard that the name of Pakistan comes from an acronym. This is very interesting, and I was wondering-where is your source for that?

@PlexorF1

3 жыл бұрын

I'm not too fond of that statement. I think the pak means pure

And Millions perished

Amazing video like always. You're a big inspiration for my channel, so thanks for another great video! 😊😊

1:41 The Union Jack is upside down 😢🇬🇧

@ChadtronicFan

3 жыл бұрын

How does that matter

@danielkrcmar5395

3 жыл бұрын

@@ChadtronicFan How doesn't it?

Great video.

this definitely needed to be a 10 minute video at least, too complex a topic, or release it in parts 1, 2, and 3.

What about a video on Falklands War and Sri Lankan Civil War

@MidgeCat

4 жыл бұрын

As someone who used to live in the Falklands, I’d like to see that video

@El_Rey_Moglia

4 жыл бұрын

TheAngryMidget Are you pro Uk or Argentina.

@MidgeCat

4 жыл бұрын

@@El_Rey_Moglia I'm pro UK, as is most people in the island. A lot of people there don't see why Argentina wants the island when no one there wants their rule.

@caferustwat

4 жыл бұрын

@Luís Filipe Andrade History based on the Spanish settling there, so Spain would have a more legitimate claim than Argentina.

@qaseemtak9368

4 жыл бұрын

How was the falklands

You should do a longer video on this.

Mohammad Ali Jinnah was way ahead of his time. He so precisely predicted future, he was just too good. See today’s India😂

@TommyJefferson1801

Жыл бұрын

I agree but I would suggest that it would've been good if there was a complete population transfer

@animedc69

9 ай бұрын

@@TommyJefferson1801 we have to do it

@itr8247

2 ай бұрын

Population exchange is needed.

Loved the way you pronounced Hyderabad, nice video as well, very unbiased 👌🏽

00:57 One category: OURS

@sernoddicusthegallant6986

4 жыл бұрын

*God save the queen intensifies*

@bhaskarbharali5853

4 жыл бұрын

*Soviet Anthem Intensifies*

Fun fact: Indians have a more favorable view of Hitler than Churchill. I met an Indian guy who didn't realize Hitler was a bad guy, actually saying he admired Hitler for his patriotism and economic policies. I told him never to say that in the West, and told him that people associate Hitler with the Holocaust and he seemed like it was something he barely remembered, just PART of Hitler's legacy! Very interesting how different parts of the world take in history, based on its impact on them. India's unique where it probably wouldn't have any bad opinion of any of the Axis Powers, but had Japan reached India I bet they'd have a MUCH different take!

@krateproductions4872

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, Hitler symbols and books are quite popular too especially among the Right Wing Hindu-Nationalists groups. Nathuram Godse a popular Hindu Nationalist spoke in favour of Hitler many times.

@najayanlama4048

3 жыл бұрын

Well Churchill killed 3 million Bengalis in WW2. So Hitler and Churchill switch places for us.

@najayanlama4048

3 жыл бұрын

@@krateproductions4872 Imagine being this brainwashed.

@3haAD900

2 жыл бұрын

Because Churchill genocided 65% of my bloodline. We wouldnt know much of Hitler all the way here, just that he was against the British, therefore we like him more than Churchill

@madandu

Жыл бұрын

@@krateproductions4872 Hitler's symbol was hooked-cross which is wrongly associated with Indian symbol (Swastik), an ancient cultural-symbol.

We all should be grateful that, despite the problems, the indian sub-continent did not go "full balkan" battle royale. There was the potential for a much deadlier outcome. Sometimes is worthwhile to celebrate successful outcomes, imperfect as they may be. Peace and prosperity to all.

@prateeksharma2331

Ай бұрын

As an india i kinda agree india is a united growing nation right now And uk anyway will cease to exist very soon when Scotland leaves and n ireland has became majority catholic too But none of this matters we are all humans

Shout out to LavaLampLover3000, a Patreon donor, for having a rad username

@PANZERFAUST90

4 жыл бұрын

uh okay

@qaseemtak9368

4 жыл бұрын

Weird flex but okay

I would like to see you cover the Sengoku Jidai I just recently found your work and its brilliant.

@sernoddicusthegallant6986

4 жыл бұрын

BazBattles covers it in really good detail but he dosent have HM's humour

Nice video

Good video.

1:54 Good grace! Its Boris III!

Hyderabad and Punjab: Want independence Me: No because an enclave is weird

@bloodfiredrake7259

4 жыл бұрын

Punjab didn't want independence,Kashmir and Junagarh did.

@prashanthkamath7437

4 жыл бұрын

@@bloodfiredrake7259 Also Hyderabad state and the Travancore states in the south.

@yarpen26

4 жыл бұрын

@@bloodfiredrake7259 Yeah, well... what came out of that? I mean seriously, this is a major thing to leave out.

@marksnow7569

4 жыл бұрын

@@yarpen26 Those events are not part of the "why" which is the topic of this video. We will be entitled to complain, though, if History Matters doesn't continue the story in the near future.

@Iason29

4 жыл бұрын

I really do wish they did get their independence..

Nice animation

The "I" in Pakistan does not stand for anything, it was just added to help with pronunciation, as in Urdu it is called Pakstan.

@user-yr2xr4fh5k

3 жыл бұрын

It stands for indus (the indus river) but yh thats also y it ilwas added

@StreetScholar

3 жыл бұрын

Britishers Don't speak Urdu 😅... That's why I stands for Indus my brother

@quazifaiyaz1

3 жыл бұрын

@@StreetScholar no word such as britishers

@lunchingtangpua2415

3 жыл бұрын

@@quazifaiyaz1 c

@arjansingh1777

3 жыл бұрын

@@quazifaiyaz1 It is in India, as the British reffered to themselves as the Britishers in India.

Great video as always but I think you should have mentioned this resulted in a mass migration of something like 15 million

@marksnow7569

4 жыл бұрын

That wouldn't be part of "why"- and it deserves a ginormous video of its own.

@moizahmed7392

3 жыл бұрын

My ancestors were the part of that migration. And I'm so lucky they migrated😍

When James Bissonette wants a country partitioned, he gets a country partitioned.

@pravahsaxena3537

2 ай бұрын

Who is he

Ghandi was opposed to Indian partition and felt that muslims and Hindus can be at peace if it’s United The Hindus thought he sided with the muslims and was targeted as a sympathiser

@suryateja1713

3 жыл бұрын

Gandhi is the man who said he will give independence to Nagaland and in present situation that matter is a mess there. Nagaland even adopted their own army to fight Indian army.

Well made.

How do you draw those maps??i have always been curious...

@AzureRT456

4 жыл бұрын

He uses Microsoft Paint

@AzureRT456

4 жыл бұрын

You do know it's a joke right, John?

@JD-Media

4 жыл бұрын

@@AzureRT456 Doesn't look far off it.

@SamAronow

4 жыл бұрын

He probably traces existing maps using Adobe Illustrator and modifies them as needed. At least that's what I do.

@Ks-rp3mt

3 жыл бұрын

He's better at drawing maps than britain and france

You could have mentioned the Cabinet Mission Plan in this video. Under this proposal India would have stayed united but under a federal system. The main reason this didn’t go ahead was due to how many on all sides feared that this would lead to states breaking off from India and destabilising the subcontinent as a result.

@tausifkarim8861

4 жыл бұрын

The muslim league was in Favour of this though.The Indian congress was not.

@Fed_Express

2 жыл бұрын

@@tausifkarim8861 Correct. Ultimately, the blame has to be put on Nehru because he couldn't play the second fiddle to Jinnah and was a terrible negotiator and this is true especially for the days leading up to the cabinet mission's dissolution. I'd say though that Jinnah literally made it impossible to have any compromises after the failure of talks which directly led to the direct action day. Had that not happened, it is conceivable that Congress and Nehru ultimately would've agreed and compromised maybe after the second round of talks. But after direct action day, it was clear that Jinnah would not accept anything less than an independent state of Pakistan.

@alcabone1126

Жыл бұрын

Nehru also said Pakistan as an idea would die and a unified india would be controlled by congress which panicked Jinnah and the Muslim League

British India, French Indochina : No you can't just be Independent in one piece!!!! Dutch East Indies (Indonesia) : Haha Pancasila goes brrrr

Hyderabad initially declared independence, but the Indian army soon invaded and annexed the region. The other kingdom which did not join India was Sikkim at the foot of the Himalayas, right between Nepal and Bhutan. Here there was a revolution against the ruler in 1975, the Indian army invaded and the country formally asked to join India.

@ayushgarg423

Жыл бұрын

Nope Indian Army surrounded the Hyderabad and then the king of Hyderabad left and went to Pak as majority want to join India so people were angry in his decision soon after Patel surrounded the city well indian army didn't invaded so using invade is wrong and about Sikkhim in 1973, anti-royalist riots took place in front of the Chogyal's palace. In 1975, after the Indian Army took over the city of Gangtok, a referendum was held that led to the deposition of the monarchy and Sikkim joined India.

@aryans2582

Жыл бұрын

Indian army massacred thousands of muslims and we are proud of it 😅

@Delllatitude7490

11 ай бұрын

​​@@harris4355he political descendants of the nizam would disagree, even today they strongly claim, nizam and the rayakrs left to Pakistan. It's called Mimam or something,

@Deutscher_Krieger795

9 ай бұрын

@@ayushgarg423 Smilar thing happened in Kashmir people wanted to join Pakistan and their king seeked help from India and indian then also invaded kashmir.The Famous Indian Hypocricy.

@animedc69

9 ай бұрын

@@Deutscher_Krieger795 India belongs to hindus. Muslims are invaders

So the largest empire in the world at the time gave up their most valuable colony because an old man threatened to starve himself.

@nouhowlmao2809

Жыл бұрын

And millons threaten to molotov british bases

1:32, another thing to note is that it's also a farsi compound work, paak پاک means pure and staan ستان refers to land, so the word paakistaan پاکِستان means land of the pure

Need a longer video mate..

The animation’s hilarious!

But why was the British/English history series discontinued?

@kamanashiskar9203

3 жыл бұрын

It didn't. It finished with the Late British Empire video, which dropped off in the year 1997.

0:50 thanks for the good laugh. I lost it when I heard the way you pronounced "Hyderbad"

Everyone always says the UK drew lines that don't honour ethnic groups and cause instability. And then when they do in India/Pakistand and Israel/Palestine it causes instability...

@gamermapper

Жыл бұрын

Except in this case, they divided it based on religion, which makes literally no sense. Most Pakistanis are of North Indian ethnicity but are for some reason independent while South Indians aren't even tho they're very ethnically different, even having dark skin.

2:16 Or to continue the great game and prevent the USSR from having influence over India.

Partition of India was a brilliant act by the British. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are successful states.

@derubermensch9060

4 жыл бұрын

chomotkar bolechen dada

@Ggdivhjkjl

4 жыл бұрын

Sri Lanka wasn't part of British India.

i have a friend whose mom was born in Tamil Nadu once told me that the partition was a situation manufactured by Northern Indian politicians...she said that the muslims of Southern India ignored the proclamation of Pakistan because they had more in common with their hindu, buddhist, and christian neighbors in the south than the muslims of the north "a Punjabi Muslim has more in common with a Punjabi Hindu than a Punjabi Muslim has with a Keralite Muslim."

@sirat_ul_jannah57

3 жыл бұрын

I m punjabi muslim and we have nothing in common with punjabi hindus...

@safuwanfauzi5014

3 жыл бұрын

south india have less conflict in north it war, war and war, that why majority muslim state or territory in the south are ok with india. in also in malaysia-indonesia hindu and muslim live in peace, yes they are riot in malaysia and indonesia but it was chinese vs native. in 1998 and 1969, also others.

@aniket5993

3 жыл бұрын

Actually muslims do wanted pakistan , when voting happened for creation of Pakistan then muslim league won by majority

@JamilAhmed-md8mf

3 жыл бұрын

@@sirat_ul_jannah57 Yeah, not like you speak the same language, live in the same region and have similar culture.

@trndsttr7585

3 жыл бұрын

That's merely an opinion. The reality on ground was quite different. Eating samosas and ladoos doesn't make you a single nation.

Wow!! If only they had that coexist sign!!!!

Partition of India was a blessing in disguise for us

@TheDonMan97

3 жыл бұрын

I know... Otherwise, India would have been like Israel with terrorists all around them. India already has enough terrorist attacks as it is.

@eunallmaharaj8583

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheDonMan97 Very true , Pakistan is in a mess. I am not an indian citizen , but do take notice , if the muslims were 50 % India , than that would have caused a challenge in India ..

@3haAD900

2 жыл бұрын

How so? Pakistan only is a mess because it formed itself solely out of religious hatred and extremism... 93% of Muslims see Hindus as equals, same would have happened if partition didnt happen

@affan3095

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDonMan97 now RSS terrist r causing mayhem

Britain: the sun never sets on the British Empire Decolonisation: laughs in independence

The border between Jordan and Saudi Arabia is mostly straight. However, there is a small irregularity. Some say that Winton Churchill was drunk while trying to draw this line but he hiccuped, and the mistake exists to this day.

Do one episode on Bangladesh 🇧🇩 Independence

@prateeksharma2331

Ай бұрын

Yep gotta see those 93000

This subject needs a longer video

@pravahsaxena3537

2 ай бұрын

True

With the power of hindsight and couple of wars later i can say with confidence that it was a somewhat good-ish idea for now at least or until the nuclear bombs start falling

While partition of India has been done a lot, could you make a documentary of India's process of incorporating the Princely States into India? There were 500 of them post-independence, and I can't see every one of them rolling over and joining India without issue.

@thegodofwar1052

4 жыл бұрын

Mountbatten pressurized them

@JoelJames2

4 жыл бұрын

@@thegodofwar1052 Thanks, I actually looked up a video on it right after making that comment. Interesting enough, there was one city-state (I believe) that's ruler wanted to join Pakistan, while his people wanted to join India. When he declared that the city would join Pakistan, his people revolted and overthrew him :P

@thegodofwar1052

4 жыл бұрын

@@JoelJames2 that was Junagadh but was a district actually, not a city.

People's that exist: - Ours - Not Ours

You should do bengal partition in detail

where are french and portuguese Indias on the maps??

@chillaxo9863

4 жыл бұрын

Not significant

@ayushkumar-bg1xf

4 жыл бұрын

France was only imperialist nation which was friends with India and left India with dignity . Portuguese were most shameless thugs .

@pritsingh9766

4 жыл бұрын

India requested Portugal to leave but those shameless creatures were not ready that's why they were attacked and around 30 Portuguese were killed and some 600 were taken as POWs .....

@stafer3

4 жыл бұрын

@@pritsingh9766 Thanks, I didn’t know that. Now I have response to all those Indians that brag that India never started a war to enlarge their territory and only lead defensive wars.

@stafer3

4 жыл бұрын

@Shivaji the Great Why should I look up their rule? It’s irrelevant how country rules its territory. That’s not justification for other countries to take it. Well, unless you believe it is. But if you believe that it’s OK to take territory just because it’s ruled by “barbarians”, then fine by me, but I hope you aren’t hypocrite and you are also OK when British empire expanded it’s territory with same justification. I don’t care when large empires try to expand. I just really can’t stand this sugarcoating of everything. Just say it like a man. You wanted more, you exploited internal weakness of other empire that fought within itself so it couldn’t resist. That’s regular tactic. Many empires do that. Just please don’t act like some random village in mountains that defends itself, when you have continent wide empire and rule over fifth of world population.

2:37 junagarh also opted to stay independent until became an integral part of INDIA.

@sologamer4ever

3 жыл бұрын

joke right

@code6233

3 жыл бұрын

@@sologamer4ever nope

@sologamer4ever

3 жыл бұрын

@@code6233 well same like kashmir you guys took over juna garh forcefully shameful act of lies

@arijitpalit2756

3 жыл бұрын

@@sologamer4ever Kashmir was first attacked by Pakistan. It could be a buffer state but it was Pakistan which refused to follow a civil diacourse and India had to be involved.

@sologamer4ever

3 жыл бұрын

@@arijitpalit2756 well u definitly get all iformation from wikipedia and indian media what else keep trusting this but it was the maharaja who started it all by sensing his population is muslim and will be voting to join pakistan he met indian side and made a deal

I want to emphasis that it was farrrrrrrrr more complex than this but however you covered most

Is the guy in the glasses at 0:12 Ernest Bevin?

Despite beliefs there doesn’t need to be fighting, just sit back and settle it over a cricket match. Once every couple a years

@akash23494

4 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@blenterbl

3 жыл бұрын

Cricket is Backyard budget baseball ⚾️

@itzimperiumxvi2620

3 жыл бұрын

Lee blen and Baseball is a BTEC version of rounders.

@blenterbl

3 жыл бұрын

ItzImperium XVI didn’t actually think you would respond after a year....great comeback btw ,hurt me a little more than it should as a baseball enthusiast.

@itzimperiumxvi2620

3 жыл бұрын

Lee blen it’s all fun and games 😅

Mate this was a terrific video! though i must ask a question that's always bothered me; why wasn't Sri Lanka ever administered under the Raj? I mean, Aden and the gulf states were at one time, so why not Ceylon???

@adityagoel4191

11 ай бұрын

cuz the British inherited a fully functioning western-type administration in Ceylon (courtesy the Dutch) when they annexed it whereas in other areas you mentioned they had to create a beaurocracy and administration from scratch, so they lumped everything with India until they had to separate them.

"British saw everyone as being under one category... Ours" hilarious if you were making a fairly subtle joke there.

1:43 the executive curls (the loop of gold braid) are facing the wrong direction on each arm