“Since it employs an automatic loader, the T-14 doesn’t need a gunner...” uhm.. I don’t think that’s how it works

@vale.44peru63

3 жыл бұрын

(If u don’t wanna read it all skip to the last line) Yes, but with my comment I wanted to underline quite a big mistake in the teminology used. Usually a tank only really needs a minimum of 2 crew members to operate, a driver (controls the movement of the tank) and a gunner (controls the weapon/s), except some very rare occasions a thinrd member is found in the role of the commander (gives order and organizes the work and outside of the tank). Now to the point of the video, many tanks also have a fourth (or more) crew member to help in the reloading process of the weapon/s, the loader, this role can be accompished also by an automated mechanism called “auto-loader”. So what happens inside the T-14 (a pretty much every single soviet/russian mbt from the T-54) is that an auto-loader takes the place of the human loader, NOT THE GUNNER!!

@englishalan222

3 жыл бұрын

If the tank gets hot and the auto-loader gets damaged the gun becomes useless as it cannot be loaded manually. With a western tank, if the loader is wounded you just get another loader.

@vale.44peru63

3 жыл бұрын

@@englishalan222 there are pros and cons to an autoloader. Yes as you said, its a machine whoch means that it can have malfunctions, if damaged it will need to be repaired, and overall a fourth man in the tank can always come in handy (for spotting, repais...). But on the other hand an autoloader will be much more efficent than a human, yes, there are some loaders that can load a 120mm shell in under 3 secs, but they won’t be able to do it consistently. For example the M1 Abrams has around 4/5 shells in a so called “sweet spot” in the ammo rack, but once those shells are gone it will take much longer to reload the gun, or the loader will be moving 120mm shells inside the fighting compartment, which isn’t really the best, in order to always have the “sweat spot” full. An autoloader doesn’t have that issue. Furthermore both systems can have the ammo placed in a safe place, where in case of fire/explosion I won’t destroy or damage the tank. They are both 2 very valid systems, Nato tanks usually will have a manual loader to benefit from its pros, while soviet tanks usually are equipped with an automatic one, also because it can drastically reduce the size of the tank, Just look at T-80, T-90 and even the K-2, Type 10 and Leclerc turrets, they are significantly smaller compared to the Chally the Leos and the Abrams, and a smaller target is harder to hit. There is no better system at the moment, both have quite big advantages and disadvantages

@mcphan6881

3 жыл бұрын

Its an unmanned turret

@southautomatic2239

3 жыл бұрын

@@vale.44peru63 Вы перечислили несколько преимуществ танка с автоматом заряжания и только одно преимущество танка с четвёртым членом экипажа: он может когда-нибудь пригодиться. Ради этого приходится существенно увеличивать объём боевого отделения. Ведь заряжающий не сидит компактно на стуле, а стоит на ногах и таскает снаряды. А это тонны и тонны дополнительной стали, чтобы забронировать увеличившийся объём (в кубе!) и снижение стратегической мобильности: танк преодолевает не все мосты, нужны более мощные тягачи, платформы, самолёты и т.д. это увеличение давления на грунт, что ведёт к снижению проходимости (сокращает варианты манёвра на карте, или снижение тактической мобильности), ухудшает соотношение веса к мощности двигателя, опять снижение маневренности и увеличивает нагрузку на подвеску, двигатель и трансмиссию сокращая их ресурс. Бесконечно увеличивать вес нельзя - поэтому в большинстве проекций, кроме лобовой, толщина брони у танка с заряжающим очень невелика в сравнении с русскими танками с автоматом заряжания и плотной компоновкой. Вы верно указали, что заряжать быстрее автомата человек может только первые несколько снарядов. Затем он устаёт и снаряды надо доставать уже не из таких удобных мест. Делать это на ходу по пересечённой местности - хуже, чем русская рулетка. Автомат заряжания гарантированно безопасно заряжает при любой тряске. Автомат заряжания позволяет сделать основную боеукладку в самой нижней части танка. Это значит, что значительную часть времени в реальных условиях боеукладка будет скрыта от прицелов противника неровностями на местности. В отличие от танка с заряжающим, где боеукладка в башне всегда удобна для прицеливания противником. Наконец то, о чём западные воины стараются не думать: в случае по настоящему серьёзного конфликта будут применены ядерные средства поражения. Облучённый заряжающий просто не сможет таскать снаряды. А вот наводчику в русском танке нужно только нажимать кнопку. Он сможет это сделать и при сильном облучении. Русские всерьёз собираются воевать до конца. Солдаты НАТО готовы к такому? Так что Ваши слова, что лучшей системы нет - некорректны. Система с автоматом заряжания значительно превосходит по целому списку боевых качеств систему с лишним членом экипажа. Да и ещё: лишний член экипажа - это и увеличение потерь личного состава.

I'd like to test this tank in WarThunder. It's the only place I can actually get my hands on a tank anyway.

@thetipsymankey

3 жыл бұрын

Hahahaha me too ... 🤟🏾🤟🏾🤟🏾

@vukashin88

3 жыл бұрын

Hahahahaha 🤘

@steffenrosmus1864

3 жыл бұрын

And that may be good so. 😂😂😂😂

@eddiex009

3 жыл бұрын

Is in arma 3 and the one with thre 50 cal gun is a beast

@allday1377

3 жыл бұрын

Me too

A don't know how you can call a tank that has never seen combat and that you just have to take someone's word for. The best tank in the world

@masondegaulle5731

2 жыл бұрын

Given it's Russian, I think it's pretty safe to take the claimed performance and chop it in half, then sprinkle on a dash of "Russian Assembly, maintenance and Parts Selloff" for that good old Russian variable.

@squidysnose69

2 жыл бұрын

Take thier word for it and if it turns out to be bs you can laugh your ass off later

@KnightofAges

2 жыл бұрын

Worst part is, not only we have no idea about the T-14 abilities, but not even if it's REALLY the key Russian tank. They have a History of developing secret tanks that only appear once the war starts for real.

@2stroketimebomb

2 жыл бұрын

A Challenger II/III would decimate it,.... End of... Russian scrap metal!

@squidysnose69

2 жыл бұрын

@@2stroketimebomb since when has the challenger seen combat

You forgot to mention that is also stealth, because nobody saw it in Ukraine! Invisible....Magic!

@andrejjanicijevic234

Жыл бұрын

why would you use it against old soviet tanks lul, maybe we see it in action soon

@yaossmirkingrevenge9709

Жыл бұрын

@@andrejjanicijevic234 all 2 of them?

@rickster5120

Жыл бұрын

First tank that gets TOWED into battle

@albertocrf5221

Жыл бұрын

They are intended to be used against NATO, not Ukraine.

@raymondsamaniego261

Жыл бұрын

@@yaossmirkingrevenge9709 there is 100 delivered

3:23 Even tanks are taking selfies these days

@makeachaininthecommentsect7953

3 жыл бұрын

lol

@novemberalpha6023

3 жыл бұрын

😱😱👍👍😆😆

@Zichoe

3 жыл бұрын

the dedliest monopod u can use

@sannidhyabalkote9536

3 жыл бұрын

@@Zichoe yep

@martinkubis4470

2 жыл бұрын

Look at that frontal reactive armor! And the big turret! Thats some hot stuff..

Tractor tow point seen on the front

@kojack-07

2 жыл бұрын

Perfect for when you deploy conscripts and they abandon the tank. 😄

@marshalljulie3676

2 жыл бұрын

This wasn't in Ukraine though 🤔

@jesseaffiliate6328

2 жыл бұрын

@@marshalljulie3676 cause rus ancient army doesnt want to sacrifize this "modern tank", better to stay out

@jesseaffiliate6328

2 жыл бұрын

@@marshalljulie3676 Comrad Julie got offended

@fvllgrey

Жыл бұрын

@@jesseaffiliate6328 Lmao. Us lgbt army fanboy

The T-14's visibility is so reduced even Russian tank crews are unable to see it.

@tomscoolgames7616

Жыл бұрын

It’s because it has cameras instead of vision slits next time make a better educated comment

@bluecedar7914

Жыл бұрын

@@tomscoolgames7616 It's because they are only deployed to military parades in Moscow, not to any actual combat units. Hence very low visibility. Nothing to do with sights and crew vision. Next time have the intelligence to understand the language you are reading in and recognise a pisstake before replying to a comment.

@tomscoolgames7616

Жыл бұрын

@@bluecedar7914 mate they are only deployed in parades because its in the prototypes its not in production yet

@bluecedar7914

Жыл бұрын

@@tomscoolgames7616 And probably never will be.

@tomscoolgames7616

Жыл бұрын

@@bluecedar7914 yes it will there’s 140 expected for production in the following months

I wasn't aware that issuing a press release was all it took to have the best tank in the world. No one believes the Russians would actually lie about their capabilities so everything must be true. Here I thought you had to actually build and field the tank and prove it in battle or at least in realistic simulations against your opponents. You know, walk the walk not just talk the talk.

@JOhnDoe-nl4wj

Жыл бұрын

fast forward 2 years and now we know russia got a wooping 8 out of 20 T-14 running. nowhere near a frontline of course, cant have one of those badboys getting scratched by a $50 drone and risk some image damage

@grungieryeti8219

Жыл бұрын

Not to mention the Russian media outlets state that the t14 has actually fought in Syria, one of the most recorded wars in history, and there’s no footage of a t14

@kardamon268

10 ай бұрын

​@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj Имидж это само собой но, армат не 20 или 8 штук, выбросьте свой телевизор пожалуйста и перестаньте верить пропаганде

@kardamon268

10 ай бұрын

А где поучаствовали абрамсы, леопарды, леклерки, и пр.? Наверное воевали максимум против т-72А да и то с ужасным экипажем

@virgilius7036

8 ай бұрын

They have already claimed this about the T72, destroyed by Western tanks during the two wars in Iraq!

It's no threat to anybody. The actual number of Armatas in active service can be counted on two hands. Same as the SU57 fighter but it can be counted on one hand. (actual deployment)

@paulstone472

2 жыл бұрын

The number in active service is zero.

@MWGScorp

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulstone472 What do you mean? They've been kicking Ukrainian ass with them. ;)

@bearman1226

2 жыл бұрын

​@@MWGScorp Oh well, are u sure about that? last time i check they kicking Ukrainian civilians asses with artyllery, cluster and thermobaric bombs by striking hospitals, schools and residential buildings. Russian tanks in the other hand are beeing destroyd or abandoned by troops due to lack of fuel, supply and/or no will to fight. Sadly this war was totally not necessary, and millions of civilians will pay the price, for this act of aggresion. at least it seems that war will be over soon, already 1/3 russian troops was killed, injuerd or captured so i hope this nightmare will be over soon.

@obi3kenobi

2 жыл бұрын

@@MWGScorp lol no.

@gchelem

2 жыл бұрын

@@MWGScorp 😂😂😂😂😂Russian weaponery is like crap. No matter how much of it you have if it smells and looks like crap, it is crap.

To be honest, it should be considering that the other MBT's are decades old.

@mangotaco9433

3 жыл бұрын

but they are reciving upgrades to modernize

@cstgraphpads2091

3 жыл бұрын

@@mangotaco9433 That doesn't change the fact that the basic design of most MBTs are still decades old. It should come as no surprise that a tank that was newly-built from the ground up in the last 5 years or so is better than tanks that were originally designed 40-50 years ago and have only had upgrades bolted on.

@matejsb4720

3 жыл бұрын

10-20 years is not much for a tank to be consider "old and outdated". You have Russian T-90AM which is 30 years old tank and still one of the best in the world.

@chaejones3969

3 жыл бұрын

@@matejsb4720 Compared to a new design and newer technology, it's old. This tank has other countries going back to the drawing board right?

@zhufortheimpaler4041

3 жыл бұрын

@@matejsb4720 well the t90 is for russian standarts a good tank, but it is only a upgraded version of the t72 and compares very badly to western tanks like m1a1 or leo2a5-6 m1 and leo2 may be old, they have been kept up to date and modernised constantly and have been produced from the start to a higher standart than t72 and its competitors

Such a great tank that russia has like only 12 - 14 of them. I remember hearing that they can only to afford to make 2 a year. I wonder how well it stands up against the javelin...

@gamblerssensei7607

2 жыл бұрын

It will probably get blown up

@gamblerssensei7607

2 жыл бұрын

Which would happen to any tank that went against it.

@maksimoltu8236

2 жыл бұрын

well

@zealousdoggo

2 жыл бұрын

I here it makes a nice tractor for plowing fields

@4wardfr3ak23

2 жыл бұрын

It should be a lot better than T80s and T90s, that’s for sure

Why did the "best tank in the world" pick an engine descended from the Tiger P engine?

@iskanderbaert2173

Ай бұрын

beceaus of the term called intelligence leak basicly sart poeple leave from Russia to a better cuntry that actually pays for work

@romanum7621

20 күн бұрын

I caught another Lazer pig fan☠️☠️☠️

@romanum7621

20 күн бұрын

And no, it doesnt use a Tiger P engine and how would even that kind of engine make the tank go up to 90kmh forward speed☠️☠️

"I'm proud of you, grandson!" -The T-34.

@michaeldy3157

2 жыл бұрын

this turned out to be a dud tank , a copy of a failed u.s tank from the 80's , with good tech on it though. few built.

@dec13666

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaeldy3157 And yet, it managed to kick some Nazi's ass, in the Battle of Kursk... Meanwhile 🇺🇸 in WW2: 😪😴

@bunbun8050

2 жыл бұрын

@@dec13666 nahh we where fighting japanes and suppling canada and britan and even the ussr

@dec13666

2 жыл бұрын

@@bunbun8050 _supplying_ 🤣... Good one 👍

@bunbun8050

2 жыл бұрын

@@dec13666 english is not my first language

At the end of the day, it's a super high maintenance intensive vehicle because all main battle tanks are like that no matter how well engineered they are. A tank is only as good as the mechanics and techs that take care of it. Fixing a tank is always brutal time consuming work. Tanks are the F-1 Formula race cars of the battlefield, everything engine must be completely stripped down and overhauled or replaced with a repaired engine and tracks replaced after each exercise or battle.

@kevinblackburn3198

2 жыл бұрын

Truth. I know from experience. And all tanks throw track.

@stevenspilly

2 жыл бұрын

Engine and tracks replaced after every battle or exercise? Wow... 😳

@Superknullisch

2 жыл бұрын

Amm... no. You don't need to replace neither tracks nor engine after each exercise or battle. Tensioning the tracks, perhaps, sure! And the regular general daily maintenance and checks. But other than that, not really anything, unless you happen to have reached the next major service/maintenance point in the schedule. Or, if you actually managed to get hit during a battle engagement. Or, I don't know, perhaps sand gotten past the engine air intake filter, if you're in a desert environment. So, my question to you is, what kind of tanks have you been working on, since you present this bleak image?

@WiesoNurMistnamen

2 жыл бұрын

You can see in Ukraine now how many tanks just get abandoned because they broke down. Bet the corrupt Russian army is not into regular maintenance

@stevenspilly

2 жыл бұрын

@@WiesoNurMistnamen I think they're mostly out of fuel

All twenty of the them produced in seven years. WOW!

@oliverheller7209

2 жыл бұрын

100

@eizlaniskandar7946

Жыл бұрын

Did you read about the tank? The tank is a prototype around 2014-2020 They only started production last year because its brand new

@thomaslinton5765

Жыл бұрын

@@eizlaniskandar7946 2014 prototype - eight years ago. There was an announcement by the Russian Government that over 2000 would be produced by 2020. They have a handful because they were incapable of producing more.

@angelanothanks6

Жыл бұрын

Twenty may well be an exaggeration.

um... it's almost 2023. How's the T-14 doing? lol

@NYJGreatness

Жыл бұрын

It's so bad not even Russians want to be inside of it. It can't even go 100 ft without breaking down.

There are reasons why many are skeptical about these self-claimed specifications. They lack objectivity. No videos but photos only. Show us how rapidly and accurately it fires and how it does the shoot and scoot maneuvers.

@jacobjorgenson9285

Жыл бұрын

You can be fairly sure that when it comes to tanks, Russia do not design a dud

3:48 The specs sheet says the main gun’s caliber is 12mm. lol

@alexjohn836

3 жыл бұрын

125mm

@deanhankio6304

3 жыл бұрын

@@alexjohn836 and 152 mm too

@markohint444

3 жыл бұрын

@@deanhankio6304 There is no Armata tank with 152mm main gun. Only on paper.

@comareborn8734

3 жыл бұрын

@@markohint444 There was supposed to be, but the funding/resources couldn't be found. Which sucks because many said it had the potential to be the best tank gun ever.

@jimmyrincon3910

3 жыл бұрын

@@comareborn8734 the T14s 125mm gun is the best 125mm gun so far.. Its has the highest muzzle velocity of any 125mm gun.

Saying a tank that's not even operational yet is the best tank in the world is simply nonsense. It may well by one day. But right now it's only the best on paper. And paper doesn't win battles.

@user-hi4ef6we9j

2 жыл бұрын

Испытали его в Сирии

@br0mley597

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-hi4ef6we9j How many is there? 2? :DDDDDD

@paulstone472

2 жыл бұрын

@@br0mley597 The last I heard they had 19 being used solely for evaluation and demonstration purposes. The one they put in a military parade recently broke down half way through the parade.

@TorianTammas

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-hi4ef6we9j You mean they drove one tank a hundred meters in a military compound in Syria.

@HowardMessias

2 жыл бұрын

I've a feeling this is a Kremlin sponsored site.

If a tank does not exist, can it still be considered "the best"?

@fjodorfjader8661

Жыл бұрын

Only in Putin's head LOL

@dereenaldoambun9158

Жыл бұрын

Ay, give 'em a break. At least it exist on parades.

@angelanothanks6

Жыл бұрын

In russia, yes. The T-95 was their previous "super-tank" project. it never got beyond cosmetics placed on a T-80 but Russia and their propagandists were claiming it was the best. At least with the T-14 a few have actually been produced. In that sense its better than the T-95 as a tank. But so is my shotgun because unlike the T-95 it's real.

The best? You can't say the best about a tank that had only been seen in a parade and has never been tested in battle.

This guy has made so many errors, and and now I can't take him seriously. It is irritating.

@protorhinocerator142

3 жыл бұрын

Here's one I don't think anyone caught. Minor but still a mistake. At 8:34 he says the USA had problems with the M-1 in Desert Storm. Not true. We had those problems during Desert Shield, the precursor to Desert Storm. The air filters on the M-1 tanks would cake up with sand. Chrysler had to real quick redesign the air filters and get them deployed. Desert Shield was a defensive strategy to protect mainly Saudi Arabia from further invasion. Once the problems with the M-1 were sorted and we had enough military mass, the strategy shifted to attack instead of defense. That would be Desert Storm.

@lip124

2 жыл бұрын

@@protorhinocerator142 This what I'm saying the Abrams is combat proven, and MERKAVA tank; the armata is not, you don't know what errors a system can have till its in combat. Testing is fine but combat proven is another. And deserts storm was an amazing strategy.

@protorhinocerator142

2 жыл бұрын

@@lip124 Agreed. If you want to test a car, you put it on a race track. If you want to test a tank, put it in a war. No general wants to use a weapon system that's not battle tested unless he has to.

@barfuss2007

2 жыл бұрын

primitive Putin-propaganda...

@worldoftancraft

2 жыл бұрын

@@barfuss2007 you're inadequate, are you?

Well this aged like fine milk

@bub6871

Жыл бұрын

How so? Wait, you believe Ukraine is winning? You've been tricked into supporting a pointless war where men are being slaughtered by Russian artillery just like Vietnam and Iraq. Ukraine's been winning for 7 months yet Russia controls 20% or the country and just held votes. Russia is losing yet Ukraine needs billions to keep the army afloat? If Russia is losing so badly why spread NATO? Russia will be collapsed this year according to Western news. Putin has 20 diseases, 5 attempted coups have happened, and Putin is a mad man who started an unprovoked war.

@lofis07a

9 ай бұрын

​@@jasperpercabeth9140best tank in the world would probably be struck by artillery and abandoned by its crew

@TheMegamyGamer

9 ай бұрын

​@@jasperpercabeth9140ok to explain, all tge hype for the T-14 is probably nothing but hype. Over the years the T-14 have gone from "We have hundreds of them " to " 14 experimental are on the field and hundreds are in production" . This is a major red flag as it shown that not only the T14 armata is not combat ready but its also in such short number that they can't be deployed on the field. And again there is so little of those tank produce that rhea won't have an impact on the war.

@Crin3122

9 ай бұрын

@@lofis07ait doesnt even have to be hit. after like 10 minutes itll break down

@Crin3122

9 ай бұрын

@@jasperpercabeth9140LOL better thats funny

Looking at this 2 years later this seems hilarious.

Best tank in the world...that exists really only on paper 🤷‍♂️

There is no way “entire information management suite” is made in Russia. They don’t have the capacity to make chips on their own. Let alone some of the parts or tools.

"Best" on paper: I'll buy it. To be best in the world, it has to exist in the world...in greater numbers than the dozen or so floor models that have never been able to succeed in a contested battle space.

To be the best tank in the world first you need to exist in the first place. The t-14 to this day is just a prototype

@SYNtemp

2 жыл бұрын

Bunch of prototypes... handfull. And the yearly production these times around 2, that is TWO... There were even talks (in home Russia!) about whether just only artificial vision (screens) is viable for the crew long-time...

80-90kmph!? Meaning this massive beast could run side by side my motorcycle in a freaking highway. wtf.

@Skinny6539

2 жыл бұрын

Most modern tanks go that fast. It’s not that crazy

@dantheman2292

2 жыл бұрын

@@Skinny6539 nope most fall around the 60kph mark

@lajossimon6371

2 жыл бұрын

@@dantheman2292 or less. I had drive my T-72 around 80km/h . , where i was in the army . But not easy to drive on that speed. Not easy to keep it straight.

@petrsindler1525

2 жыл бұрын

You need a better bike

@eizerflak6967

2 жыл бұрын

@@petrsindler1525 *cries in asian*

Best tank but hasn't seen actual combat? Only time will tell how good the T-14 really is.

@MovementFAV

2 жыл бұрын

Nvm the combat, i want to at leas the test runs and commissioning videos.

@generalkayoss7347

2 жыл бұрын

Time has told us that most Russian tanks are hyped up and then turn out to be piles of shit.

@faceless2467

2 жыл бұрын

@@generalkayoss7347 but the American Abrams, unable to withstand the hit of the ancient rpg 7, show themselves to be reliable as a Swiss watch.

@generalkayoss7347

2 жыл бұрын

@@faceless2467 The Abrams has eaten RPG's for lunch all over the middle east for 30 years now. You're just making shit up lol

@faceless2467

2 жыл бұрын

@@generalkayoss7347 you probably also believe in Santa lol.

The best thing about this is that it doesn't exist. Putlins tank is delayed - again.

@roneldell1474

2 жыл бұрын

The Russian military originally dispatched numerous reservists equipped with aging and underpowered equipment. As a result, the intended targets were weakened, and the missiles supplied by the West were used against less valuable targets instead. This tactic dates back to the dawn of warfare.

It is for parades only.They only have 20 of them and are still considered prototypes.Their turrent also blows off just as easily as a T-72 does

@lavel8002

Жыл бұрын

Их более 50 ещё идёт производство

First we do not have real combat data on this tank. So I wouldn't claim it as GOAT just yet.

@helmsmanpavel3713

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah but that dose not make me sleep any easier at night knowing that the Russians have a good tank

@sanluispotosiarenia14

2 жыл бұрын

@@helmsmanpavel3713 They also have pretty awesome aircraft if it makes you feel any better. Russia tends to produce better combat vehicles compared to the US and other militaristic nations, (or at least comparable on a much lower cost) however their production capabilities are inferior to countries like the US. By the time the russians produce and field one of this things, the US can field 10 (probably inferior) tanks, or more.

@helmsmanpavel3713

2 жыл бұрын

@@sanluispotosiarenia14 you Right

@helmsmanpavel3713

2 жыл бұрын

@@sanluispotosiarenia14 is equipment is also most of the time easier to use there fore troops can be more effective in combat

@Fred-yb4es

2 жыл бұрын

@@sanluispotosiarenia14 They have comparable vehicles and weapons but not enough money to make them effective or have enough of the newer vehicles do inflict as much damage as you might think. They barely have enough pilots to keep their air force in order with most of their pilots not having enough flight hours to keep their license due to not having enough fuel for training flights and such. also Russia has a very hard time producing and replacing older vehicles with new or upgraded ones. We will likely see more T-90m tanks come out than T-14 and they wont have half of they vehicle feet upgraded until after 2030 due to lack of funding and their continued development problems. Money is the biggest problem for Russia at the moment.

This hasn’t aged well. 2 years later, and where are they?

This is *thee* GREATEST tank ever designed! It cannot be destroyed by any other tank, not even at point-blank-range. It is armed with a 16-inch naval gun that is accurate to 24 miles. It can drive along the ocean floor at close to 50 knots. It can fly! It can shoot down fighter jets, satellites, you name it! And it is equipped with the PIONEER FH-X830BHS Double Din Stereo system. It even has an ice cream maker! ... *(JUST DON'T TAKE IT TO A PARADE.)*

@josephstalin331

2 жыл бұрын

When you try so hard to be funny, but end up being stupid 🤣:

@andlir2

Жыл бұрын

Hahahaha! "The only feature it lacks is a washer/dryer, but they are working on that as we speak" :))

@Storel552

4 ай бұрын

Don't worry, none of the top 5 has proven anything. All of them are 3+ generation and look very good on paper. In one-on-one terrain, you don't know. Abrams in simulations in Germany was hit hard by a TR85M1. So what are we talking about? The details make the difference and how well the crew knows their car and above all how much they can get out of it. The rest is just fine. It's like formula 1. The driver is 80% of the car. If he's weak, the car is called a Ferrari for nothing .

@85daniel

3 ай бұрын

It can drive? - Not for a long time. I think that's the main problem.

2 years later, "Russian army reluctant to use the T-14 due to its poor condition" 👌

I think it is way to early to say T-14 is the best. BUT I would bet every completely new MBT designs, will include all the following elements the T-14 has. 1) Modular design. 2) Crew-less Turret with autoloader 3) Armored modular crew compartment 4) Soft and hard kill protection.

@jimmyrincon3910

3 жыл бұрын

The T14 Also has.... AI with auto detection, tracking and target lock. The ability to go fully robotic. Stealth. Ability to designate targets from stand off ranges and pass target coordinates to other more powerful long range anti tank platforms. Ability to deploy two drones for greater NLOS situational awareness.

@nerdianz8081

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah but T14 is the first...and others are far behind...and by the time others are catching up, T14 will be an already tested and mature platform ready to implement newer technologies....

@steffenjespersen247

3 жыл бұрын

@@nerdianz8081 Well that is my point, you call it mature, but it is not. It is still only produced in small scale and at least from what is shown it is hard to say if all the systems are fully integrated and work in real world scenarios. Just to be fair I would put something like the F-35 in the same category. But tech that they wish to use in the T14 looks good, so if that can work as intended on a battlefield under those conditions then it would be the best tank. But this has not been shown yet.

@Elthenar

2 жыл бұрын

The Russians build things to look dangerous, not actually be dangerous. Until the T-14 sees honest to god combat, it's a question mark. I am not sure about the crew less turret. Maybe if the west starts using bigger guns, that could force them to use an autoloader. As of now, there are a number of significant advantages to have the loaded. He's a 4th man to help with repairs and maintenance, which is a bigger deal than most realize. A well trained NATO loader can reload faster than an autoloader. He can also swap ammo on the fly far easier.

@undertakernumberone1

2 жыл бұрын

@@Elthenar the 13cm Rheinmetall that is currently in development is projected to probably use an autoloader... however I've heard from a few ex-military mates that tank crews always would have liked to have a 5th member (like in german tanks ruing WWII) to help with maintance and just in general. Going down to 3 from 4 would put more work load on the other 3. Also the issue of an unmanned, thinly armoured turret is that it's far easier to take out. And then you're left with a well protected hull...

It's so good they stopped production and is currently trying to develop an entire new tank, amazing.

Why the T-14 is the best tank in the world: Short answer, its not.

@ogsgamer1

2 жыл бұрын

no its

@tsetsoooo

2 жыл бұрын

Nice argument there NATO bot

@NWA744

2 жыл бұрын

@@tsetsoooo "NaTo BoT" Nope, I'm a real human. I just don't have enough hubris to crown something "best in the world" when it's never even seen active use yet.

@lucaspham5238

2 жыл бұрын

@@NWA744 agree

@Sneakyboson

2 жыл бұрын

@@tsetsoooo Ok, so where are all the t-14s wise-guy? Is Putin waiting until all his rust-bucket T-80s are either destroyed, stolen or abandoned to unleash all 3 of his new toys?

Tanks are like battleships. They have passed their prime.

@marcob4630

2 жыл бұрын

Yesss!

@cmorichie7202

2 жыл бұрын

Well, for the same reason Battleships are now obsolete, Aircraft carriers should be as well for the same reasons.

@tplus3017

2 жыл бұрын

@@cmorichie7202 Nope. Battleships lost their luster when aircraft could be brought to the fight. There is always a need to command airspace.

@rafsandomierz5313

2 жыл бұрын

@@cmorichie7202 Aircrafts are needed for many jets and planes as fuel stations when air fueling cannot be used for various reasons or repair stations when jets, airplanes or helicopters have to land for also various reasons.

@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely not.

Im impressed, but remember Desert Storm? Saddam had just bought a lot of "unbeatable russian tanks". If memory serves me right, after the largest tank battle in modern history, the US had one tank down, because of a broken track, Saddam's entire tank force was destroyed. History doesnt always repeat, maybe this is indeed very different, but it gives me a large pause. All sides are always bragging and then increasing funding while the contractors are rubbing their hands together lol

This video has not aged well.

It might be the best tank in a parade.

@alancooper4494

2 жыл бұрын

Show Pony

@tonykalf5946

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣 Best argument in this thread.👍

@callumsmodellingcentre6902

Жыл бұрын

Considering one of the 6 used at parades broke down, it's not even good for that 😂

The ammunition magazine auto-loader should be inside of a heavily reinforced container with a blowout panel, instead of having the cannon shells contained in a ring pattern around the turret. This design flaw has caused many Russian tanks to explode spectacularly when the turret armor his penetrated by any anti-tank projectile. The United States' new AbramsX tank was designed with lessons learned from the armored combat in the Russo-Ukraine war.

"Why the non battle tested Russian propaganda machine they only have 14 combat ready of is the best MBT in the world because Russia said so" Fixed the title

@eliasziad7864

2 жыл бұрын

Because its 2.5x cheaper than the M1A2 abrams tank is and is a beast armor with 150 mm gun that can penetrate any western armor...

@joshuawalcott321

Жыл бұрын

@@eliasziad7864 says who? weve all seen how well russian equipment holds up to the claims(not at all)

@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling

Жыл бұрын

@@joshuawalcott321 Russian equipment, historically speaking, has somehow outperformed the US in Vietnam and Afghanistan (although both were insurgencies)

History has shown that, even with disparities in equipment capabilities, CREW TRAINING is usually the deciding factor, as Israel showed on Golan in 1973.

@rebelcrusader9973

2 жыл бұрын

Naturally, when comparing hardware, the crew skill is and must be out of the equation. And yes, you can still be a super-skilled CS player using a old hardware, beating players using cutting-edge hardware.

@El7IncA

2 жыл бұрын

THATS BECAUSE THE ALMIGHTY GOD WAS WITH HIS PEOPLE ISRAEL, BECAUSE THE NAME OF JESUS HAS POWER!!! THE BLOOD OF JESUS HAS POWER!!!! AMEN!!! HALELUYA JESUS IS COMING!!! THE END IS NEAR!!

@DavidFMayerPhD

2 жыл бұрын

@@El7IncA If "Almighty God" was so strongly on the side of his "People Israel", what in the Hell was it doing during WW2? Taking a nap?

@annatascha3979

2 жыл бұрын

@@El7IncA God in WW2: "Napping"

@kevinblackburn3198

2 жыл бұрын

And always will be. There is also logistics and deployment. Refueling, maintenance, deployment, etc...This is b where the US rules the armor world.

Best tank in the world that will never see a battlefield due to only a few handful being produced, and those that are produced will likely be combat ineffective due to nearly non existent maintenance. But..... best tank in the world.

@Khetaggoldenboy

2 жыл бұрын

The same was said about Russian hypersonic missiles until Russia used them. And then everyone screamed in horror that these missiles exist.

@khangluong5672

2 жыл бұрын

@@Khetaggoldenboy ??? What are you on? Everyone knows hypersonic missiles exist, it's literally 1945 tech.

@Khetaggoldenboy

2 жыл бұрын

@@khangluong5672 I'm talking about new missiles. Which Putin showed at his inauguration. In the West they said that he shows cartoons. But it turned out that Russia used them in Ukraine, albeit the weakest of its arsenal.

@khangluong5672

2 жыл бұрын

@@Khetaggoldenboy It's literally putting the Iskander on a plane

How can something that technically doesn't exist be superior to things that are real and battle tested?

The T-14 is apparently so good that it doesn’t even need to be _combat_ proven to earn the coveted accolade ‘best in the world’! Seriously, how can _any_ military hardware that remains utterly untested in battle be adjudged ‘best’? Silly.

@al1ce90

2 жыл бұрын

all the nukes aren't combat tested, same goes SSBN and SSN, they are all trash lmao

@stephenmyers7076

2 жыл бұрын

@@al1ce90 nukes and subs have both been tested 🙄

@Hiker_Nature_009

2 жыл бұрын

@@al1ce90 you never heard of Ivy Mike, Castle Bravo, Castle Romeo, Tsar Bomba🤔

@joserodriguezjr.6422

2 жыл бұрын

Because in Russians minds..only russians...they think they have the best of everything in the military field...yet they can't mass produce any of these magical weapons lmao. Either way we need to worry about the chineese.

@makara80

2 жыл бұрын

@@al1ce90 …I wasn’t aware that folk had been bickering over which country’s _nuclear weaponry_ was the best… ;) A rather poor attempt at false equivalence on your part.

This video aged like milk.

You forgot to mention that it seems to be invisible in conflict zones.

@tonmoyghosh8513

Жыл бұрын

😄😄😄😄

@Aaronreacher

2 ай бұрын

Just like the Abrahams x

What will it be? Mechanical breakdown? out of gas? or abandonned by the crew for this thing is be an easy target.

Everything is good about this tank excepting the automatic active protection system. I really don't know how it will perform in a desert condition over a long period of time. In a sandy, high temperature zone it's performance needs to evaluated. I think the Thar Desert Rajasthan India is the ideal place for testing this tank. There is a rumour in the Indian media that India is interested in buying 500 T 14 Armata. But Indian army never buys anything without testing it.

@MovementFAV

2 жыл бұрын

Think they going with k2

@I-MAC

2 жыл бұрын

Why make a tank that has to be able to adapt to the desert when your country doesn't have a desert? Unless it's your intention to attack an oil-rich country in the desert.

@zirkon-jq8tn

2 жыл бұрын

Werden sie machen✌️

@jaydeepchakraborty9073

2 жыл бұрын

@@I-MAC We have Thar desert bordering Pakistan.

@aishikmukherjee8438

2 жыл бұрын

@@jaydeepchakraborty9073 I think he's talking about Russia

I need to correct something in the video, the Terminator is not an anti-tank vehicle, it's a designation that has no equal or similarity in western militaries, the closest you can say is probably a "Tank Support Vehicle" where it supports the MBT's

@sheriff0017

Жыл бұрын

"Tank Emotional Support Vehicle"

LOL I thought this was a Babylon Bee story at first. The Russians couldn't pour piss out of a cup with the instructions on the bottom.

Все отлично, но такого танка нет, только демонстрационные варианты

Full of inaccuracies... there are a lot of better YT channels contributing on the T-14

@patrickd7890

3 жыл бұрын

Even spelling and grammatical mistakes

@danny_d_bongo

3 жыл бұрын

Can u name them. Id like to see their videos.

@superwout

3 жыл бұрын

@@danny_d_bongo start with Red Effect, TankNutDave, Matsimus, Blacktail Defense, Defenseupdate, the tank museum

@danny_d_bongo

3 жыл бұрын

@@superwout nice thanks

@patrickd7890

3 жыл бұрын

@@superwout I watch all them too, as well as The Chieftain, The Scottish Koala

Given that production started in 2015 and some of the basic designs elsewhere (like the abrams) are as old as 1975 (1980 production or so), one would hope that one for one, it's a little bit better. But you'd better have air superiority if you're riding around in it. Tanks are more useful for keeping your subjects in line in the last 50 years, and to that end, they may have arms customers who really like that feature.

@zeffy._440

2 жыл бұрын

the original Abrams yes though the newer models are up to date and capable there really isn't a best tank

@PaddleDogC5

2 жыл бұрын

Abrams constantly updated.

@Metoo3232-pu2wc

2 жыл бұрын

The worst threat to a tank is anti tank weapons. You need infantry moving with the tanks clearing the area before the tanks can go in otherwise they will get taken out as we are witnessing in the Ukraine.

@legendary4570

2 жыл бұрын

Abrams M1A1 is into is second iteration now the M1A2 and in its third revision known as SEP(system enhanced package)V3. The Abrams is constantly being upgraded and retrofitted with new technology. It’s platform is too efficient and there is reason to go back to the drawing board and start from scratch.

@tonykalf5946

Жыл бұрын

The Leopard2 is same design and production period of the Abrahams.

What an amazing, high-tech, beautiful 3-man coffin 👌👏

T-14: "heh hey guys it's just me the best tank in the world!" Holy Javelin operator: 😎

@cooldabadam

Жыл бұрын

T14 can defeat javelin

@alexusmc2384

Жыл бұрын

@@cooldabadam Yeah

@warthunderaddict

Жыл бұрын

What javelin? The ones that were captured?

@schwanzuslongus4638

Жыл бұрын

@@warthunderaddict who cares if some where captured, russian fascist?

@schwanzuslongus4638

Жыл бұрын

@@cooldabadam nope

A meteorological mast, to know what the weather is outside. In case of atomic winter...

Can't wait to see their flying turret

@moigospodin4155

Жыл бұрын

I feel sorry for you. I'm from Ukraine.

@septicwhelk3654

Жыл бұрын

Watch CNN by any chance ?

What I don't get about the logistics issue in Ukraine is how in WW2 they had such old tech but were able to keep their thousands of tanks fueled, but in a few days they were abandoning vehicles that aren't even as heavy

@jipleyYT

Жыл бұрын

Land lease trucks deliver by the USA to Russia and ALOT of them , Russian logistics is heavily depending on railroad hence the trouble they have fighting outside of Russia

@jamesbailey6257

11 ай бұрын

Because the only reason the Soviet Union survived WW2 is because of American lend lease lol

@virescentmorsmordre9568

7 ай бұрын

Correction: the only reason the USA survived was because of the Soviet Union. Also Soviets would eventually overcome Nazis anyways, they had vastly superior industrialization.@@jamesbailey6257

@romanturchmanovych4638

7 ай бұрын

It was a trap. To fool the fool we must be fooled. It was the only way he was going to believe he will take Kyiv in 3 days. DaY 580, still counting and thousands of tanks destroyed. Slava Ukraїni 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 The Fool is next, dick of ruscist land. Heroyam Slava 🇺🇦

And where is this super tank in Ukraine? I think the Armata is just a prototype or a ghost!

@aarshbhushan1062

2 жыл бұрын

lol, these are expensive as shit to Russia 😂

Like a guy in the age of tanks series said, weapons always beat armor. Someone will probably just develop a warhead that deploys anti clusters before impact or something to stop it from being destroyed before impact.

@keonigseggjesko12yearsago75

3 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, war has rules. If they didn't then every country would have this.

@whyarewestillhere8562

3 жыл бұрын

In the medieval ages tho somewhere around the invention of the gun armor surpassed the sword for a while.

@attacpowdergaming7098

3 жыл бұрын

@@whyarewestillhere8562 Yeah, it did, but the sword was usually a sidearm. Weapons in the medieval period should be looked at as a collection, because all cultures had sword equivalents or axe equivalents, and all of them were used where appropriate. Plate armor was superior to conventional sword tactics ( although half swording was a thing ) but in those cases, there were axes or Lucerne hammers, which were capable of transferring enough destructive force into the armor to harm the wearer. You might not break or crack the plate but that doesn’t mean it didn’t hurt.

@Sasha-nl8ry

2 жыл бұрын

@@attacpowdergaming7098 Whack someone in the side of the head with a warhammer and they are likely to just vomit and pass out.

@billwhoever2830

Жыл бұрын

Russia actualy has something like that. Their new RPG launcher features secondary projectile fired. Its designed to defeat ERA and possibly trigger the Active protection systems. The Israel active protection system has a long reload time and wont be able to fire twice. For comparison the tubes the t14 has on the sides are active all the time and can deal with multiple projectiles without reloading.

Impressive spec. I don't know what to make of the potential foreign customers' list though. At least two of them are close and getting closer to a major competitor, who would love a sample for both industrial and military intelligence. Also, with all 3 crew members encapsulated and digitally connected like that, are we almost at the point of having a full telepresence MBT?

@omicronixzerus2929

2 жыл бұрын

Very far. Such a vehicle would be extremely vulnerable to both comms jamming and e-warfare.

@cowstable

Жыл бұрын

M1 Abrams, 4 crew members. T-72, 3 crew members (no loader). T-14 Armata 2 crew members.

The T-14 wouldn't stand a chance against the Leopard 2a7 😂😂 it was really good I really had to laugh. It's like trying to compare a Mercedes to a mini cooper. I haven't had to laugh like that in a long time, thanks for that. Anywhere you google it or ask military or weapons experts. Always the Leopard 2a7 is the best combat tank in the world. And speaking of that, the Leopard 3 is already on the way. ✌️

@thelastsamurai4434

2 жыл бұрын

Tell me you don't know shit without telling me you don't know shit.

@MT-pp9yy

2 жыл бұрын

2a4 were rekt in Syria ..

@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling

Жыл бұрын

@@MT-pp9yy He said 2A7 , not 2A4. And those Leopards were destroyed because of shit Turkish crews.

And this why I get kicks from reading old predictions! 🙂

How can you rank a tank that is not field/battle proven. I might be biased due to being a US Army Veteran once assigned to the 3rd ACR How Battery at Ft Carson. I know what M1A2 can due in combat. Just because it looks nice doesn’t mean it is the best tank in the world. This is my opinion only. Great Video👍🏽

@SugarCainYT

2 жыл бұрын

They don't have to test it in battle, they can just test it.

@AlexCatable

2 жыл бұрын

What's better, nimitz class carrier or ford class carrier? Later have not been battle tested yet afaik

@quisqueyanguy120

2 жыл бұрын

That's because the T-14 armata is the most advanced tank in the entire world to this date.

@yoinks9907

2 жыл бұрын

With the technology the world has you can battle test a tank without it even being in combat. And you look at the statistics of a tank. Like how much armour it has size of the gun the kind of thermals it has how much gas it takes to operate speeed mobility ect

@yoinks9907

2 жыл бұрын

And you also look at how dated the tank is in general aswell. Like the Abrams although it has upgrades the model itself is still 50 years old and outdated compared to the model of a t-14 which has taken the good stuff from previous tanks and other counties tanks throughout the years. And it also has an auto loader which gives it an advantage over tanks that don’t have them. And the armatas crew is separated from the ammo completely so if the tank does get hit the crew is completely safe. So you Jsut look at stuff like that. And like I said before with the technology we have now you can simulate battles without the tank leaving the garage

It's superior to other tanks because it won every battle on paper and imagination.

@tnediserProFluaPnoR

2 жыл бұрын

perfect post

@dereenaldoambun9158

Жыл бұрын

Well, you aren't wrong there.

It's basically superior to most modern and concept MBTs but a tank commander in the turret is still important for observation purposes

I tried but no, I just can’t stop laughing 😂

@DTczsk1999

Жыл бұрын

Russophobia!

Yeah it is surely the best, thats why they cant use it in Ukraine it will be the best tank target for javelins and nlaw. They stil use auto loader with built-in pressure cooker.

Let us all hope that we never find out how good it really is as opposed to TV productions and gymkanas.

@paulbedichek2679

2 жыл бұрын

It's not any good as they haven't made any.

For one thing you can't believe a damn thing the Russians tell you, second I'll take the m1a1 Abrams before any tank in the world, from what I understand the Abrams has never been totally destroyed by enemy fire. that's incredible and PROVEN to be the best in the world.

So, a tank that Russia cannot afford to produce, and which has no reliability is the best in the world? Russia planned to have 2,300 T-14's by 2020. Instead it has just 10-20 parade-models. Seems like a HUGE fail to me.

I guess we know now that the Armata was quite literally *_too good to be true._*

@drill_fiend1097

Жыл бұрын

We will never know because it sits in garage all day long.

If one actually believed the T14 is the best tank in the world, they really know very little about tanks, tracked armor strategies, history of tank battles, how to employ tanks, yeah… it’s a big list

@codaxthevulture4129

2 жыл бұрын

Everyone knows that tiger 1 is the best tank unmatched today ;)

@DerderianEclecticTravel

2 жыл бұрын

@@havenmist2216 I assume you’re referring to my obviously navy rank. Before I was navy, I was in the army for 6 years. However if you’re referring to my statements of understanding armored tactics, theater strategies, history of armor warfare, etc., These are part-in-parcel of an armor soldier’s training from shortly after day-1. And they include Russian, west and central Asian, East Asian and European studies in these. As to if I’ve ever used the T-14; obviously that’s not possible. But neither is it necessary. One doesn’t have to have a train his one’s car to have a good understanding of a train wreck. The tank is built small and low, it is going to be fielded with the same un-evolved understanding of armor warfare and the very specific defenses that understanding dictates. Please let’s not ask asinine questions

@DerderianEclecticTravel

2 жыл бұрын

@@havenmist2216 I’m sorry. Apparently you cannot read and understand what’s written and implies to the reader to understand. We are now done with this conversation.

@coinmandyl

2 жыл бұрын

@@codaxthevulture4129 how could anyone delete a tiger tank today?!?!?

Why T-14 is best tank in world... because it's only seen on the parade grounds and it cleans up nicely? High maintenance and Russian are things that don't really tend to go well together. Have you ever seen a Russian Air Force base? Good gawd they can't even be bothered to throw garbage in a garbage can. No way they pay to maintain those vehicles properly. Their tank crews don't get maps or mission objectives and you're going to put them in a high tech vehicle? Hilarious. Ukrainian farmers can't wait to start towing them.

Just add 2 tractors and it will be already useless.

@nvs0k100

3 ай бұрын

Sure 😂 these tractors better have apfsds rounds bc if not they wont kill a ww2 tank, not to talk about t14, especially with ERA exiting

Every new tank will take same principles as Armata platform,it just makes sense!

@tommygun5038

2 жыл бұрын

Except auto loader.

@St.Matthew422

2 жыл бұрын

@@tommygun5038 Autoloader too, its dumb not to use it since human loaders cost more than replacing an autoloader + autoloaders can load heavy shells in just 6 seconds or even less

@jordzking6330

2 жыл бұрын

@@St.Matthew422 True but it makes the tank overall more expensive and harder to maintain, not to mention if 1 or 2 little things go bad the entire loading system will need to be checked and it'll probably be out of the fight if that happens for who knows how long.

@worldoftancraft

2 жыл бұрын

@@tommygun5038 Guy, are you manually loading your machinegun too? I mean manual feeding. Did a shot? Feed a round! Did a shot? Feed another one!

@tommygun5038

2 жыл бұрын

@@worldoftancraft ....Tanks aren't machine guns and auto loaders have their own drawbacks. Which is why very few countries have that system on MBTs. During the first gulf war a M1 crew had 3 kills in 5 seconds.

Very interesting information, thank you! Do you have more information on the armour steel grade and type of composite material that is used?

@grigoriysalzmann7223

2 жыл бұрын

Of course he has. It is absolutely NOT a secret information :)

@user-di5fx9gc2c

2 жыл бұрын

he made by plywood...like other russian fake weapon)))

@user-es6ij4rg4i

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-di5fx9gc2c из фанеры у вас калаши, и кастрюли вместо касок, а танки на изоленте🤣

Javelins and NLAWS: “yummy”

On paper it's the best tank in the world, but in terms of combat, It's still cannot be said the same since we've never since this in active combat

@misaelg7011

11 ай бұрын

Pronto lo estara no te preocupes , ya desde 2014 lo habían anunciado y en 7 años ya deben de tener cientos de ellos

If the T-14 Armata is a super tank. Then what the actual hell is a Ukrainian farmer? Superman and Batman in one?

The T-14 design is heavily based on the OBJ 477 Molot which itself dates back to at least the mid 80's, so this is still very much a Soviet design - at least the concept itself.

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

I thought it was the 195

@str1k3rex

2 жыл бұрын

@@Justineexy the 477 is the 195 predecessor, but the 195 is basically the prototype of the T-14, as the T-50 is the prototype of the Su-57

@Dakimov27

Жыл бұрын

Вы так говорите про советский союз как будто это другая страна ) Но это все ещё та же страна только под другим флагом. Основные конструкторские бюро находились и находятся на исторической части России, и есть ещё много конструкторов которые работают со времен СССР в тех же самых бюро.

@magnem1043

Жыл бұрын

The T-14 uses a new version of the old X engine from German Tigers, obtained from blueprints

@Tramigais

7 ай бұрын

​@@Dakimov27there is a tank factory in kharkov, ukraine. all 15 republics were involved in Soviet science. when Russia is alone, hardly anything new happens. all based on the USSR. it seems that after 50 years it will be the same

I think the T-14 Armata is more a proof of concept for exporting and making a standard modular frame for crews to keep them safe and few in new systems. It makes sense of them not using it heavily in the war, but rather focus on make the trued and tested tanks

A legend, in their own mind.

make no mistake, the t 14 armata is the best parade tank

@timothyraycob3446

Жыл бұрын

Wrong. Couldn’t even make it through the Red Square parade 5-6 years ago without it breaking down and having to be towed off parade field. LMAO

Its funny to watch movies about ryssian speriority now

*Laughs in Rheinmetall*

would be if it actually fucking existed!

until it is used in combat on a real war scenario it cannot be considered the best MTB

@tommygun5038

2 жыл бұрын

There's not enough of them to make much of a difference.

@JANFILLA

2 жыл бұрын

There is really no better Tank for Parades in Red Square.

@obi-wankenobi5332

2 жыл бұрын

they are made from cardboard and they are not tanks just props made for parade

@zeffy._440

2 жыл бұрын

So basically the Abrams also cannot be considered a good MBT then? It's never fought against anything except obsolete export models of tanks which didn't even have composite armour.

@MovementFAV

2 жыл бұрын

At least show us some training videos or the test runs.

Military TV 228K subscribers I usually prefer the M1A2 Abrams, but I have to say the T-14 Armata looks awesomely rad!

@GodOfChaos_HeXa

3 жыл бұрын

it may look awsome but i think its just overhyped and pure bias

@jamieolberding7731

3 жыл бұрын

@@GodOfChaos_HeXa Same here too.

@jimmyrincon3910

3 жыл бұрын

@@GodOfChaos_HeXa how is it overhyped biased? It's the worlds 1st Stealth tank and a FULL generation ahead of any other tank. The T14 is the most advanced tank in the world

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmyrincon3910 "1st Stealth tank" my ass

@jimmyrincon3910

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kalashnikov413 words of someone who knows absolutely nothing about the T14. Bases his dumb opinion on thin air

T-14: IM THE BEST TANK NO ONE CAN STOP ME KF51 panther: *guten tag*

thing is, manual loaders are more effective, and experienced loaders are able to load faster than auto-loaders, which were known mfor jamming, and can get easily damaged or destroyed. Plus the shells get little to no protection. The Leopard 2A7 is still the best tank

@Sk-xp5dv

2 жыл бұрын

Leclerc XLR is the best actually.

@weasle2904

2 жыл бұрын

Manual loaders are orders of magnitude safer for the crew compared to the Leopard or Abarms.

@Kvistor

2 жыл бұрын

What you get with autoloader is a consistent reloadtime. Loaders tire and the ready rack gets emptied. Both types has its advantages and disadvantages.

@sceptillion6847

2 жыл бұрын

how is leopard 2a7 the best tank dawg

@MagentiumPRIME

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sk-xp5dv wrong :3

Never seen in action. You would imagine it was used in Ukraine 🇺🇦 long time ago 🤷🏼‍♂️ Never was

If i remember correctly, rheinmetal also recently developed a new tank capable of combating the t-14

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

No, Rheinmentall didn't develop a new tank, they took the 2A4 and suited it up to the max but still lacks behind, Even against a 2A7v the Revolution still lacks behind a 2A7v

@keonigseggjesko12yearsago75

3 жыл бұрын

Shhhhhh, let me have this.

@arcaipekyun4232

2 жыл бұрын

@@Justineexy I guess he meant the new French German tank, the one with Leo 2 hull and Leclerc turret with 130mm L/51 cannon

@Justineexy

2 жыл бұрын

@@arcaipekyun4232 -_- Keep up with the news. That French German tank is nothing more but a prototype for research purposes and nothing else. He is talking about the 130mm L/51 gun that has recently been shown mounted on a modified Challenger.

Best tank only on paper.