If the Earth was flat, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.

@sentientprogram660

4 жыл бұрын

True

@yourtoygod4ever39

4 жыл бұрын

Not if the flat earth is lets say 100.000 miles long.

@michaelturner3606

4 жыл бұрын

How many times y’all gonna use the corny statement

@DPImageCapturing

4 жыл бұрын

If the Flat-Earth morons believe the Earth is flat, why don't they find the edge & jump off?!

@ArKritz84

4 жыл бұрын

DPImage Capturing because the edge is not in their mom’s basement or the inside of their car, so the “research” stops right there.

After an extensive study I have found two common things among flat earthers. They were VERY slippery at birth, and their parents were very tall.

@BIGMOUTHLOUIS

3 жыл бұрын

hahaha!

@aaroncourtney6591

3 жыл бұрын

What

@ishanghosh6604

3 жыл бұрын

? What ? Could anyone explain

@deanlindholm8663

3 жыл бұрын

@@ishanghosh6604 They got dropped on their heads at birth

@ishanghosh6604

3 жыл бұрын

@@deanlindholm8663 ah ok

Think about it. If the Earth was in fact flat, the properties on the edge would be the most expensive because of the stellar views.

@JFK-ir7yz

3 жыл бұрын

What edge?

@tankacebo9128

3 жыл бұрын

I see what you did there haha

@bishalshakya7366

3 жыл бұрын

According to flat earthers there is no space.

@JFK-ir7yz

3 жыл бұрын

@@bishalshakya7366 you’ve been to space?

@bishalshakya7366

3 жыл бұрын

@@JFK-ir7yz oh are we playing "you don't see, you don't exist"

For years I have wondered that very question. And the answer was so perfect! Thank you sir for illuminating that one pixel in my brain that had been in the dark all that time.

I was a flat-Earther for five years, until I turned five.

@harikishore2514

5 жыл бұрын

Probably your father is flat earther.

@jamesallen5591

5 жыл бұрын

LOL

@JohnRedshaw

5 жыл бұрын

@@harikishore2514 he is under the earth

@Tin.Man.Trading

5 жыл бұрын

Then you have been programmed for 5 years by education. And now you're scared to face the truth.

@jamesallen5591

5 жыл бұрын

@@Tin.Man.Trading Why do all of you use the same language/words. You are a cult.

A flatearther’s greatest fear is sphere itself

@Brimannn1

5 жыл бұрын

Bear Knuckles Not a joke, just a fact.

@conflectiz

5 жыл бұрын

Stop stealing others’ comments.

@Brimannn1

5 жыл бұрын

conflectiz I’ve been saying this for years, you twat!😂

@dalecarpenter8828

5 жыл бұрын

Pretty good ! How do the explain the curve of the earth ? Rhetorical!

@tryithere

5 жыл бұрын

I thought it was diabetes.

i like the way you present things and the info you include as its detailed enough to clearly understand and straight to the point...well done!

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

Well done! Not to mention that the Soviets would have called us out had the telemetry been from anywhere else other than on the moon.

@lightyagami3492

3 жыл бұрын

If you had a powerful enough receiver at the time you could even tune into the moon landings live yourself to prove its real.

@zackattack635

2 жыл бұрын

Russia absolutely didn’t believe we went to the moon. Most Russians still don’t believe it. At this point, with all of the information that is available, you have to be willfully stupid to believe it. Look at the “craft” they used. Look at the fact we can’t do what they did then… today with modern tech. If you think we landed on the moon still, you’re willfully naive.

@ElenaGeorge1

2 жыл бұрын

@@zackattack635 Wherever you get your news, you need to find a better source.

@zackattack635

2 жыл бұрын

@@ElenaGeorge1 as opposed to you, someone who thinks we went to the moon in 1969 and played golf… but can’t come close now. 50 years of insane technical progress, just can’t match the comically dumb “craft” they used to do the impossible? Stop being so gullible sweetie.

@EaglePicking

2 жыл бұрын

@@zackattack635 You suffer from Dunning-Kruger. A doctor will not help you but finding more information and actually studying the subject instead of watching stupid videos about it might.

We can't see them because they are not there .

@larjkok1184

7 жыл бұрын

VITA kyo Yeah you can't see the wind on earth either, but it exists. You see the effect of it but not the wind. You dim-witted spastic. You must be American.

@larjkok1184

7 жыл бұрын

wide awake You can see air can you? Your proof that the moon landings didn't happen is you can't see the flag up there?

@vitakyo982

7 жыл бұрын

***** First you say my claim is nonesense , then you say : not there => not to see , is true . Which is exactly what i said . You should take a class in logic ...

@vitakyo982

7 жыл бұрын

***** You think your logic will make appear moon landers on the moon ?

@vitakyo982

7 жыл бұрын

***** How can a logic expert as you are , believe we went on the moon ?

I love the sarcasms at the end. Spot on!

@alessandrobiassi3162

6 жыл бұрын

STIGZ .... you must be an ignorism lover and follower then....

@boblowes

6 жыл бұрын

Flat Earth people are crazy.

@craigcarlson3978

5 жыл бұрын

piss off NASA just pissss offfff

@craigcarlson3978

5 жыл бұрын

bullshit..... with all the billions NASholes have burned through and continue to waste faster than the fed can print one would think you'd want to prove yourselves. The simple truth is its all one quintessential bunch of crap. I spent my youth idolizing nasa and the like I bought into all of the lies we were sold. I hope and pray that the truth with come out one of these days...when I think of all the ways that money could have been better spent and invested I get myself so worked up I get miserable and out of sorts. ain't that a bitch

@stranger_danger1900

5 жыл бұрын

craig carlson Get a job and it will ease your mind. NASA has made many advances in medicine and technology over the years. ..When you grow up you will see.

I had no idea Uncle Fester knows so much about space

@strangebiped

3 жыл бұрын

That's FUNNY! Uncle Fester had a great smile & punch lines! I miss him! "THE ADAMS FAMILY" was great for the 60's..wait was it "THE MUNSTERS"??? I'm getting too old to remember anymore...

There is a wiki article on the Event Horizon telescope showing in pictures what was the level of magnification it had to achieve to photograph M87's black hole. It is equivalent to seeing a tennis ball on the moon. Sufficient to say you need at least a continent size telescope to see something that small clearly on the moon's surface.

@ThomasKundera

Жыл бұрын

In microwaves wavelength, right. But in optic, a smaller telescope would do (a 100m wide should see Apollo remains, a 1km wide one should see a tennis ball - but for atmospheric effects and such). Still way more that what we have now.

@amentco8445

Жыл бұрын

@@ThomasKundera I thought clustering telescopes would make up for that? Several evenly spaced ones?

@ThomasKundera

Жыл бұрын

@@amentco8445 You can cluster radio-telescopes as the wavelength is large enough to allow sampling of the wave itself (several data points per wave) it's absolutely impossible with current tech in optics and as resolution decrease with wavelength enlargement I guess it's way better to just go near

Flatearthers: "We have members all around the globe."

@willhopkins678

5 жыл бұрын

LMAO 😂

@noth606

5 жыл бұрын

Translated: we have fooled idiots all over the globe

@erikmattson8629

5 жыл бұрын

Brilliant! lol

@johnnelson8142

5 жыл бұрын

Jason Huang I was never a what people call a glober didn’t didn’t give a damn about round earth or flat until I started realising the lies of nasa and the indoctrination in schools from early childhood and the media even Hollywood then I started to critically think and truly examine what they call evidence, once you do it all falls into place. The scariest thing now is the technology we have now they can make anything look real but the truth is it’s all plastic and the last thing they want is critical thinkers. In truth they are saying shut up and believe what I’m saying shut up and just get into line.

@TheBjossi80

5 жыл бұрын

Why are you guys calling flat earthers bad names? I am one and I never call a globe believer retard. Why this anger? You do realise most flat earthers did believe in the spinning ball theory before we opened our mind to reality. It's not a cult or psychological state of mind. It's just fact

I find it kind of touching seeing the tracks of the astronauts on the moon, left 50 years ago. Imagine going back to a beach you visited as a child and see your footprints in the sand still there.. we may be long gone but we left a mark on the universe. Touching

@ann_onn

5 жыл бұрын

*@Conor M* There is a tiny, crude picture of a penis on the Moon, drawn by artist Andy Warhol. Apollo 12 took up a miniature "art museum" on a wafer. Famous artists were asked to contribute. Warhol drew a tiny cock-and-balls.

@bartonez123

5 жыл бұрын

And then one day when we finally have space tourism to the moon, some fat guy wearing a Hawaiian shirt eating an icecream is going to trip over and ruin all the footprints for everyone.

@LucidDreamer47

5 жыл бұрын

@@bartonez123 Dennis Nedry?

@MunthassemKhan

5 жыл бұрын

@micah lynn Love the way no one got your point. Sure hope you did. i.e. sand, dust, collisions, 50 years and still footprints. Preserved. Perfectly. Just like your childhood beach would be... of course. ;)

@BM8C7

5 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/loiF0bCceLe7g9o.html

I’ve been watching your videos for a while now but wasn’t subscribed. I wasn’t sure if all your content was the same quality but after watching several of them popping up in my feed I have determined every video I have seen so far is of great quality. Keep up the great work you earned a new subscriber!

Before the lunar mapping mission there was another way people checked on the locations of the landings. Some missions had mirrors designed to bounce lasers back to Earth.

@jay404

Жыл бұрын

Yes but the reflectors never worked.

@Sam_Sam2

Жыл бұрын

@@jay404 they did we realized that the moon moves back from earth by just 3.8 cm

@Chindit1961

Жыл бұрын

@@Sam_Sam2 3.8cm per year, yes.

@sosababy1016

Жыл бұрын

@@jay404 yes they did, and still do.

@LexvanDijk

Жыл бұрын

@@sosababy1016 moon laser experiment is only claimed successful for the first time since aug 2020.

The real reason we can't see the landers is because over time, they sank into the cheese the moon is made out of. Yep.

@DAIadvisor

7 жыл бұрын

simul8guy - what do YOU think?

@thetagmarket1058

7 жыл бұрын

True... the moon is indeed made of cheese.

@garyenwards1608

7 жыл бұрын

you need too watch operation avalanche you just have to watch it you must see this movie it will make u shit your panties

@hakont.4960

7 жыл бұрын

Hm, I suddenly feel like having a grilled cheese sandwich :P.

@ike25young

7 жыл бұрын

God Evelyn, you and your cheesy jokes.

its a bit like trying to find a Boeing Jet in the Indian Ocean,,,,

@drexxler138

5 жыл бұрын

Lol hahhaha haha.

@vornamenachname906

5 жыл бұрын

daaaark :D

@RonWylie-gk5lc

5 жыл бұрын

ha ha

@Captc5766

5 жыл бұрын

Lol. I know, right?

@Lossyz

5 жыл бұрын

Only the moon doesn't have an ocean :-/

"But my iPhone takes great pictures, why won't it show me those landers?" Facepalm....people who don't understand how telescopes work but want to say we didn't go to to the moon because science. Oy!

@isegrim1978

4 жыл бұрын

And it comes mostly from people wo have not the faintest idea how photography works in the fist place. All that because the technicians that programmed the "Automode" actually know what they are doing...

@MrBarrynicholas

4 жыл бұрын

Sprite Bonn Would you be kind enough to give the links, thanks.

@isegrim1978

4 жыл бұрын

@Mocco Mongananzo you underestimate the conspiracy nuts.

@iminyourbasement2426

4 жыл бұрын

It’s lag

@ronaldstarkey4336

3 жыл бұрын

@Sprite Bonn what about the slug tracks and the railroad tracks and the thumb tracks... lol

Your channel is amazing Love the way you present the facts / information. I'm a fan

Nice to see the face behind the videos, cool stuff, thanks for spreading the knowledge!

@unclejerry486

7 жыл бұрын

mmm?

@Curious Droid, thanks for answering a long-held question of mine. I suppose it was something one could compute the answer to themselves, with geometry and trig, but it was nice to hear the qualitative version of it as well. Love your videos, tops.

@Guitarman7133

5 жыл бұрын

YOU IDIOT.

Your documentaries are so good, I'm happy to watch the long format any day.

Amazing explanation. As always, see you on your next video. Keep up the good work! Big fan of your channel.

You really did a good job on this and I think you explained it in layman's terms perfectly. Thank you.

@andrewe165

5 жыл бұрын

TirarADeguello I didn’t know you watch him!

@wullymc1

5 жыл бұрын

I wish he would explain how we can identify humans from space using satellites.

@TirarADeguello

5 жыл бұрын

@@andrewe165 I'm a big fan of science channels, and Curious Droid busts his ass making great content. I've been with him from near the start.

@michawojciak1837

5 жыл бұрын

As always:)

@acmagadia

5 жыл бұрын

TirarADeguello So the sun revolve under the flat earth and how come at the united state night time and Japan morning time I don't get it FLAT EARTH

Fantastic , best Vid I've watched thats answered a question I have pondered for a few years . Thanks C-Droid .

You could put a flat-earther in a rocket, take him to the moon and show him first hand and he would claim we went there and staged it.

@KvetaURL

4 жыл бұрын

“There’s a hologram on my spacesuit’s visor”

@_charliezard_7218

4 жыл бұрын

Ohrenaugenkatze _ yea , in the vacuum of space though

@radioactive9861

4 жыл бұрын

@@_charliezard_7218 That was the joke.......

4 жыл бұрын

Flat earthers - take them all to the space station and ask them to describe the earth...from the outside. Those that disbelieve gravity - take them all to a cliff and ask them what they're experiencing as you throw them off.

@kneegrow8486

4 жыл бұрын

No he wouldn't, he would say why did u take this rocket 2 the desert, & what is Stanley Kubrick doing here?

I love your channel. All things explained - in a sensible fashion !

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

Well done on explaining the Pixel resolution, much easier to understand why we can just see them :)

@RockBrentwood

5 жыл бұрын

It's also wrong. Sub-pixel resolution is standard fare in digital signal processing for images. This is the correct take on the issue. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-pixel_resolution

@anonymousshawn9996

4 жыл бұрын

And once again, NASA math doesn't add up. According to the specs of the Hubble Telescopes camera, it SHOULD be able to pick up an very thorough image of the landing site instead of a scratchy render, as shown/explained in this video. All the info that dude said in this video is absolutely wrong. And, sadly, not many people will question any of it; because not many know about even the most basic principles of how cameras work. :(

@williammcmullen1292

4 жыл бұрын

Or....it was a complete hoax

@williammcmullen1292

4 жыл бұрын

Bla bla bla we fooled u and the lunar lander is in a storage shed in Hollywood...we took the money and ran ...thanks stupid mericans

@ythinder

4 жыл бұрын

@@anonymousshawn9996 Yeah mathematicians and scientists at NASA are completely wrong, so we are to believe a random person commenting on KZread......that's how conspiracy theories start

The deniers are so thick that we could take them to the Moon and they would STILL claim it is all fake.

@rutabagasteu

7 жыл бұрын

Swinde dump the deniers on the moon without space suits see if they think it's in a studio after that.. well for a few seconds anyway.

@HosamSherif

7 жыл бұрын

They like to feel special. Like a little club of idiots.

@nelsonvisconti222

7 жыл бұрын

Swinde ....sucker think for youself

@nelsonvisconti222

7 жыл бұрын

Nexus Texas .....fuck you

@HosamSherif

7 жыл бұрын

Skipping Stone Ok, I see your brain isn't that sophisticated!. Run along now child. Adults are discussing adult things!

Not only was this captivating, well spoken, but interesting and very informative. I have to say it's not only satirical but kind of a safety net to finish all the statements with "unless of course you're a non-believer". Smart and funny.

And thank you, Paul for your informative and entertaining videos. Good fortune, sir.

We older earthlings watched all of the Gemini, surveyor, Apollo missions along with many others not mentioned. Do you think for one minute the governments of Russia, China, the u k, France etc. And their populations weren't sitting in front of their t.v.s watching too ? Their scientists were tracking the Apollo spacecrafts. The Russians would have loved to call the Americans liars in that they did not land on the moon. They were our chief competitors. Funny thing, they didn't. They congratulated us for a job well done. But yet we have present day Americans who are busying themselves with this nonsense that there weren't any moon landings. So in ten , fifteen years, some country will land on Mars. And they will see it. And when they get old they will read on you tube how young people, who did not witness the first Mars landing, are calling it a hoax. And the joke will be on them. Brave men risked their lives to take us to the moon and advance space exploration and these deniers sit on their comfortable couch and give no credit to them. Ship of Fools.

@ann_onn

6 жыл бұрын

Well said. I wasn't _quite_ old enough, although I apparently 'watched' Armstrong land, at the age of about 2 weeks. I'm hoping we'll witness it again, perhaps within 10 years. You might enjoy playing with this interactive site about Apollo 11 from the audio perspective; I did. www.firstmenonthemoon.com/

@macc240038

6 жыл бұрын

ann onn -- added the site, thank you

@arrowchaser1

6 жыл бұрын

macc240038 I saw it on TV when I was 8 yrs old! But just because it was on TV does not confirm it was real, especially when the broadcast was provided by the agency claiming to have gone to the moon..... mankind did not go to the moon....NASA lies... research it!

@macc240038

6 жыл бұрын

Denis Boissonneault - your reducing all that I said simply seeing it on TV. That's just one line. A small percentage of what I said. Do you realize that the lunar orbiters are photographing the lunar landing sites right now ? The Chinese will soon duplicate the feat that Americans accomplished years ago ? Many be you'll live long enough to see astronaut walk on the moon again. And they will walk right up to the lunar Rover and send live video back. What will you conjure up then ?

@aaaaaaaa-cv4hy

6 жыл бұрын

cheezl 2 We have plenty of proof, the problem is that you don't believe it. You should be the one providing it.

The Lunar landing was supposed to be shot in a Hollywood basement, but they hired Stanley Kubrik as director; and he's such a stickler for accuracy he insisted they shoot it on location. That is why the U.S. went to the moon.

@ericedwards1731

5 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez It's not a joke it's song lyrics dumb ass. The Red hot chilies are musicians not comedians.

@_Hadda

5 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez The only idiot scratching his nails on a blackboard is you.

@basedbear1605

5 жыл бұрын

@@johnsmith-eo3nz Typical Alinsky Fascist... attack and demean anyone with an opinion different than your own. His joke was funny, you just attacked out of malice. Grow up, Junior.

@michawojciak1837

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and they have made great comedy with that fictional scenario. And it was shot in Britain, by the way, in the basement which has huge vagina instead of doorway.

@elli003

5 жыл бұрын

Pretty good Miklos !

You do such a good job of explaining things, without all the hyperbole, repetition and rehash of other peoples footage / twitter feeds to inform people

Nicely done Paul. Awesome channel.

Short answer is.... yes we can see it and bounce fucking lasers off of it

@arachnenet2244

7 жыл бұрын

Apollo retro-reflectors! :p

@dphorgan

6 жыл бұрын

oliver dutton No those are the retro reflectors

@dphorgan

6 жыл бұрын

They did it on the Mythbusters show disproving moon landing hoaxes.

@anonb4632

6 жыл бұрын

They bounce "fucking" lasers off the "fucking" mirrors that they "fucking" left behind, not the "fucking" modules them "fucking" selves.

Thank you for a clear and concise explanation. It was a joy to watch, also I learned a few things I didn't previously know!

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

I weep for humanity that can entertain the idea the moon landings were fake

@danielmaxter1928

3 жыл бұрын

Really???? Go look at Buzz Aldrin conversation with 8yo on Bitchute about the moon. Its not on yutube. Its censored here. Let's see if you weep after that.

@ronaldharris6569

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielmaxter1928 are you saying buzz is going to deny the moon landing? Buzz Aldrin the astronaut?

@peatmoss4415

2 ай бұрын

@@danielmaxter1928 There you are! The Lunatic in this video thread!

Thanks mate!! I was always curious about this very idea.

Here's a good way to show just how hard the lunar landers would be to see from earth: Think of that iconic Apollo image of the earth rising over the moon. Now imagine how much you would need to zoom in to see a CAR on that image!

@inkyguy

5 жыл бұрын

Edmund Earle, another way is to also consider what would be necessary to spot your backyard garden shed or camper/caravan from the Moon, or for some of the doubters, their quarter acre marijuana crop.

@conflectiz

5 жыл бұрын

Wow. Thank you for making me laugh. I was having an off morning till i read this funny comment.

@37rainman

5 жыл бұрын

+Woty: A 1/2 inch newspaper letter read from100 miles away, is proportional to "reading" an object on the moon 100 feet in size. The moonlander was what, about 10 to 15 feet in size? There is currently no scope on earth or around earth that has the resolution to photograph moon landing artifacts. (Whether or not there is actually any artifacts there). Begin your research by looking up the resolution of some major earth scopes. Or perhaps it would be more easy and entertaining to watch another silly utube conspiracy vid.....

@douglasditore8528

5 жыл бұрын

Great videos

@ellabradorus4390

5 жыл бұрын

Operation Northwoods... Operation Mockingbird... The Gulf of Tonkin attack... If the CIA planned on assassinating thousands of its own people: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods then the step to faking moon landings was quite small. All the landings happened under the most fraudulent administration in history (Nixon administration) in a 3 year period (69-72) and stopped when Watergate broke. Since then, not a human beyond orbit in any of the world’s space programs. To not consider the circumstances surrounding a claim is no different than blind religious idiocy. I’m not a conspiracy guy in any way but lived in the 1960s. I wouldn’t trust a word out of a 1960s US government mouth if it had been peer reviewed and tested to an infallible shine. For many of us in the 1960s, Nixon’s first moon landing 6 months after he was sworn into office at the height of Vietnam (Tet offensive) was like if Trump’s _Space_ _Force_ put men on Mars only 6 months after being sworn into office in the middle of a Russian collusion investigation while in the middle of a major war with say N. Korea. This isn’t a claim of a flat earth. This isn’t a claim of big foot. This isn’t a claim of aliens in Roswell. This is the refutation of a claim by an unscrupulous government. *Occam’s* *Razor:* _The_ _simplest_ _solution_ _tends_ _to_ _be_ _the_ _correct_ _one._ _When_ _presented_ _with_ _competing_ _hypotheses_ _to_ _solve_ _a_ _problem,_ _one_ _should_ _select_ _the_ _one_ _with_ _the_ _fewest_ _assumptions._ So with that in mind, why is it that in almost 50 years no human has been beyond orbit in any space program in the world regardless of _Moore’s_ _Law,_ globalization and extraordinary technological advancements? Because we never went to begin with. Why can’t we see the moon landers? There never were any. Why so many questions about the moon landings with absurdly complex answers? Because we never went.

Always very informative and entertaining, thanks!

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

I like the way you explain the information. You make it very easy to understand.

Another great video, thank you Paul!

THX for all! It reminds me I was 20 and working in an hotel for the holydays (I was studen), and the night Apollo XI had landed (yes, it was early in the morning, in France), the whole crew wake up to see this historic exploit on a shitty small screen TV. Now, Im old and retired, but when i see all the conspiracy theorys, I'm between laughing or weeping. THX again !

Great steady description. Nice to watch something interesting and well spoken at a good speed. Cheers. Sailing With Vampires

You're very convincing for a cybernetic android.

@artofnoly9754

4 жыл бұрын

It's actually Uncle Fetser from the Addams family

@williamnordeste1169

3 жыл бұрын

I can't even see one hair on his head.

@override7486

3 жыл бұрын

That's because IT'S A CYBERNETIC ORGANISM, LIVING TISSUE OVER METAL ENDOSKELETON.

@1USAUSA

3 жыл бұрын

Hey Simon, Of course you can make a convincing argument about anything and everything in this world in your favor as you please whether what you are saying is the TRUTH or NOT. What?! Are you telling me you NEVER EVER heard of LAWYERS? (ROTFLMAO!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣) LAWYERS are KNOWN to LIE through their TEETH on BEHALF of their CLIENTS making a CONVINCING ARGUMENT that their CLIENT NEVER DID what he is accused of... LMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 So, you need need to wake up and smell the coffee... ROTFLMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@override7486

3 жыл бұрын

@@1USAUSA Need more ROTFLMAOs, and shitload more emojis.

Thanks you for posting this AMAZING video. Very informative. Thanks you again.

great video! really enjoyed it!

Good stuff mate! I'm subscribed, looking forward to more. Cheers!

Very good descriptions. Easy logic to follow comparing distances and “focal length “, if you will. Thx

"Moon made of cheese & only 700 ft in diameter" said chief Flatearther

@AaronSchwarz42

4 жыл бұрын

Going to the moon for fun worse than going to burning man // there's nothing happening there // its either too hot or tool cold / no nature or other people or infrastructure / cold harsh & difficult / the only reason to go to build a space port for accessing deep space & associated nuclear reactor & electric mining for mineral resources & processing into useful stuff for construction & maintenance & fueling of & at spaceport moon base etc

@artofnoly9754

4 жыл бұрын

It's actually a family sized pizza with the lot!! (Slightly overcooked.)

@jimh4375

3 жыл бұрын

It's true the moon is made of cheese, but obviously its bigger than that, at least 800 ft.

@LammaMammaplaysgames

3 жыл бұрын

I think cheese would be more likely for it to be made of that than dust. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

It just isn’t worth talking to anyone who doesn’t believe the moon landings happened. It makes me annoyed, goodness knows how the people involved feel. Mankind’s greatest achievement.

@williamchiafos2325

5 жыл бұрын

BakerCars&Hifi your mind is so closed you aren't getting enough oxygen to your brain.

@chrisbaker121924

5 жыл бұрын

@@williamchiafos2325 Actually, I have read all the facts, seen the hoax theories, seen an unused saturn V in the flesh and come up with my own conclusion that it did indeed happen.

Great job!! Thank you, love your hair by the way!

@kridadounsattapong1533

5 жыл бұрын

Wdfukc utmhh,. Isn't hkwnfs ftpn , tell world law

@Nshweeka

4 жыл бұрын

Stupid hair to depart a very smart head!

@RoBoVader

4 жыл бұрын

What hair

@albertanguttitauruq573

4 жыл бұрын

@@kridadounsattapong1533 l

@indicajohn1122

3 жыл бұрын

@@kridadounsattapong1533 yes.

Excellent work. Subscribed.

Love this channel ❤

Must of been weird parking the Lunar Buggy, knowing that it will be their virtually for ever. In the future, there will be glass around it, and tourists to the moon will visit it, like attractions on earth. 🤒

@dmsdmullins

7 жыл бұрын

But it won't be there even virtually for ever. It 'could' be hit by a meteor at any time, after a billion years those odds get better than nill. 3-6 billion years from now the Moon will be enveloped by the Sun, along with Earth and all our terrestrial and lunar creations will be reduced to atomic plasma.

@rhondaweber5638

7 жыл бұрын

+Sinister Veridicus You mean nuke ourselves to the moon.

@nickbreen287

7 жыл бұрын

As far as the human race is concerned, forever. We will not be here even in 1 billion years let alone 3-6.

@rhondaweber5638

7 жыл бұрын

Nick Breen The end may come sooner than that with all the greed, hate and killing going on.

@nickbreen287

7 жыл бұрын

Who were the globalists from 622 - 750 AD? Islam has its own agenda, fully independent from outside influence, a singular goal to make the planet islamic by any means necessary.

Well explained; easy to understand, thank you.

Love this channel

Thank you! Been wondering for years.

There is something that can be detected on the Surface of the moon: a reflector that was left there to be able to measure the distance between the earth and the moon. if a laser is aimed at the Surface of the moon it is bounced back from the reflector.The time that passes till the light is back gives an exact measure of the distance to the moon. without that reflector the reflection of the laser would be scattered and weakened beond any detection.

@craigcarlson3978

5 жыл бұрын

bullshit man its fuckin bullshit

@skyscall

5 жыл бұрын

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon Here ya go

@lordgarion514

5 жыл бұрын

But that's not evidence humans landed on the moon. There's about 5 or 6 of those reflectors if memory serves. Only a couple of them were placed by humans. The rest were done the "old fashioned" way.

@Orlor

5 жыл бұрын

Robert Pruitt says..."But that's not evidence humans landed on the moon." And then says..."Only a couple of them were placed by humans." Ummm...

@inkyguy

5 жыл бұрын

Ulrich Kälber, go away Russian troll. 🚫🇷🇺

Its like trying to find staff in b&Q

@LamboBen931993

4 жыл бұрын

So true 😂

Fabulous explanation accompanied by terrific graphics - thanks Paul!

Great video. I always wondered about this. Very well explained.

Thanks for this!

Excellent! Thanks - Keep it up.

Your videos are GREEEEAAAAT!

Great job mate!

I liked, very good and simple explanation. Congrats

Passive aggressive af!! Love it!!

I do enjoy your videos, thank you!

Excellent and informative video as always! :)

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

I loved the way he ended the video with some pure aggression in his usual calm tone.

@auletjohnast03638

5 жыл бұрын

Buddha G Dhaubhadel, Buddha, may God save you. Come to the Loed Jesus Christ and you'll be saved.

@PatrickMcAsey

5 жыл бұрын

I admire the restraint and patience he deals with the loony element who deny everything.

@beanieteamie7435

5 жыл бұрын

@@auletjohnast03638 Oh so a "cristian" flat earther. You are a discrace to the human race. (And all other cristians with a brain)

@auletjohnast03638

5 жыл бұрын

Knoot _ , Ass hole, if you read my comment i didn't mention anything about a flat earth. I was just telling buddah to leave buddah behind and come to the Lord Jesus Christ, and so should you.

There is another problem with using Hubble to image the landing cites, and it's the same reason that the Hubble has the lens cover. When you are looking at a distant star, so little of the light emitted is actually heading into your telescope that it appears very faint. The moon has a very low albido, but even so, it reflects a huge amount of photons from the sun. This would not be an issue if you were far away, but the moon is comparatively very close, so if Hubble were to look directly at it, the CCDs would be bombarded with photons, and would burn out from over exposure. Not a good expenditure, especially since it's already had it's final servicing mission. During periods of high debris bombardment, such as meteor storms, Hubble will close it's lens cap, and turn towards the Earth, protecting the primary mirror from micro-meteoroid impact. The purpose of the lens cap, even when the telescope is pointed away from the storm, is because the Earth is so bright during the day, that to look at it would burn out the ultra sensitive CCDs which were designed to look at faint distant galaxies.

@BlackEpyon

7 жыл бұрын

***** Reaction wheels (a motorized version of what we on Earth call gyroscopes). Think about it, if it couldn't change it's direction, we'd be stuck staring in the same direction.

@BlackEpyon

7 жыл бұрын

***** It's altitude is slowly decreasing due to atmospheric drag. Yes, even at almost 400 miles up, there are a few atoms for it to collide against and slow it down.

@Arkalius80

7 жыл бұрын

The Hubble has actually photographed the moon before, and it was for legitimate scientific reasons. www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html The Hubble's orbit is high enough for its decay rate to be very small. Currently, it's natural reentry will occur sometime between 2030 and 2040. It's not easy to predict precisely because there are many factors that can influence it. Chances are some effort will be made to control its decommissioning since some parts of its structure could survive reentry and thus be a hazard to people on the ground. Hubble is too close to the Earth to get a photograph of the entire planet. It's not much higher than the ISS and I'm sure you've seen pictures and video from there. Because of how fast it is moving it wouldn't be able to take useful photos of Earth's surface either.

@TheDruidKing

7 жыл бұрын

It's not a very low libido, I just think you showed more interest back in the 60's.

@jackfletcher1000

7 жыл бұрын

The word you are looking for is ALBEDO, though the man in the moon may indeed have a very high libido

This is a great video. Thanks for edification on the subject.

flatearthers: "all i heard was the end, '...and the earth is, flat.' -see? duh, we win."

Flat earthers use GPS to get to their flat earth convention.

@ann_onn

5 жыл бұрын

They're using satellites to post on the internet too...

@Customwinder1

5 жыл бұрын

Flat Earth Convention of Extreme Stupidity. .......FECES 💩

@ann_onn

5 жыл бұрын

Society has profited from Apollo. You, however, are keeping us in the dark ages by denying science. It's your fault we've not returned in 50 years. If it was supported better, we'd have been back decades ago. You're discrediting the memory of heroes who died to get us there, and spitting in the face of millions who dedicate their life to the science behind space technology.

@ann_onn

5 жыл бұрын

Tell me, how do you know that the Van Allen belts exist? Who told you they did?

@ann_onn

5 жыл бұрын

*@Cam* So you believe NASA?

I've see all your videos, great job!

This is an Excellent Channel

Wonderful really good explanation thank you so much I can show others this now and they will understand clearer the facts I've been trying to tell people for years

Very good and really helpful that you included the transcript of your explanation!! Keep it up!

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

nice work as always.

Thank you, great video

No matter what you do they will not believe you. Hell, you could take them to the moon and show them the proof up close and they'd still find a way to call it all fake.

@x-creator4460

3 жыл бұрын

The irony is that they will say exactly the same thing to you.. Even if NASA admits the truth you will never believe it. kzread.info/dash/bejne/e3h2pLewlNzgZKw.html

@thefurrybastard1964

3 жыл бұрын

@@x-creator4460 Apollo did *not* go through the equatorial region of the belts, it flew over most of the Van Allen Belts, passing briefly through the weakest parts. You are just proving my point about conspiracy followers refusing to change their minds even in the face of insurmountable evidence.

Serious telescopes of any kind are judged by their Light Gathering ability not their magnification. That would be reserved for binoculars and spotting scopes.

@ffggddss

7 жыл бұрын

Actually, by their light-gathering ability, *and* their resolving power - with roughly equal importance. The former property is good for seeing faint objects; the latter is good for discerning detail in extended objects, as well as in separating close point-sources, such as double stars.

Just have to wait for Google Moon.

@paganphil100

6 жыл бұрын

aphilipdent: No need to wait, it's already here and includes "tours" of the landing sites: www.google.co.uk/moon/

@leondeklerk907

6 жыл бұрын

You can check out mars as well...

@stevedowney4056

5 жыл бұрын

Well since you believe Google so much why don't you search white couples or search white inventors why don't you see the pictures they show you let's see how trustworthy Google is

@FeythFX

5 жыл бұрын

Steve Downey Easy to disprove. When you search for "white couple" then Google searches for everything that matches with "white couple". Yes, "Black and white couple" has "white couple" in it's title. That is a match of more than 50% (54.545454...%)! Now search for "couple white" (with quotation marks) and you end up with completely different results.

This was really interesting... Thanks!

Great explanation. Amazed to learn.

Well stated. Many people looking in a scope or their digital zoom camera at the Moon think they're seeing rocks and small bolders. They're actually seeing big mountains and craters the size of huge lakes. These things look small because there are no real known references. When we look at Earth from a probe camera and see, say Florida, we know how big Florida is and that the Okefenokee is a really big lake. Therefore we don't expect to see Uncle Billy's RV outside Miami. Also moon mountains can look really "rocky" because there is nothing to erode them down to smooth cones like on Earth. However, I do think NASA/JPL does us a disservice by employing former Disney Imagineers to render the Hubble space art they often show in place of visual spectrum photography. People see what looks like something from Toy Story or Titanic, and they assume all is movie fake. In the old days, a text book would have a hand drawing or painting of say The Solar System or the Milky Way taken from an outside the galaxy perspective. We all knew that was a best guess imaginative picture based on other science. However with the flood of CGI astral images, even with backyard telescopes, kids get super skeptical. Best bet kids. Buy an analog reflective telescope (no camera or video gadgetry. Just lenses, mirrors and knobs) for about $200, go out of the city and look at some planets. Things will start to make sense.

@joeshmoe7967

5 жыл бұрын

Except that the backyard astronomer images are NOT CGI. Composites yes, multiple images stacked in a software program to get better exposure value and detail but absolutely not CGI. I am currently working on my own shot of the Andromeda galaxies only using a DSLR and 300mm f4 lens. I got exciting results with only a stack equalling about 2 minutes of exposure. If we ever get a clear night here again (6 weeks of no good conditions) I am hoping for 30 minutes or more. Everyone repeat: Composite is NOT CGI. Your own eyes create composite images from very tiny sensors!!!!!!!!!!

@doorguru168888

5 жыл бұрын

I think you meant Okeechobee Lake in Florida ! The Okefenokee Swamp is a shallow, 438,000-acre, peat-filled wetland straddling the Georgia-Florida line.

@Bogolyubovos

5 жыл бұрын

S Tho I look up to see all those satellites whizzing around!!! They say 10,000 pieces of space junk.. Gee, I never see them crossing in front of the moon , high up there! ...WHY NOT?? USA and Soviet are not in competition!... Google Star City to see how far it has developed.. There are no ICBMs , it's all a scam for $$$$ Just short range missiles for Kruschev... Mmmm. Cuba would work!! the proof of Einsteins T of Relatively, getting debunked..... ISNT EVEN TAUGHT to you 'genius'...WHY NOT? Put that in your pipe and smoke it!! Now read further, smart guy. G E E , why all the secrecy 👺 💩💩 👎🏽 👿 😈 ( the moon landing tapes ALL DISAPPEARED!!) ...It's all about the $$$ and the Free Masons /Illuminati that are are in control... ...//😱. proof of a flat earth is easy. JUSTLOOKOUTTHE window inanysmallairplane Orwatchaship DISAPPEAR THENWITHBINOCULARS SEEITAGAIN TELLYOURFRIENDS BRAINWASHINGCHILDRENIS. SICK TELLYOURFRIENDS. PLEEEEZE

@joeshmoe7967

5 жыл бұрын

@@Bogolyubovos You can occasionally see them pass in front of the moon. NOT with just your eyes, you would need a telescope. It would not be just some casual thing, like tossing the scope toward the moon and seeing satellites buzzing by. Also literally if you blink you would miss it. The satellites orbits were not planned so you could sit and watch them passing in front of the moon. Satellites are relatively small and a long ways away...how much detail can you see in a car 2 miles away or a 747 from 6-7 miles? Satellites are way farther. You can see satellites by eye under dark skies. You can get info as to where to look and at what time. Same with the ISS.

@kevinmould6979

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bogolyubovos So. Living on the Moray Firth coast (North East Scotland) I should be able to point my telescope in a roughly north easterly direction and see Norway? Bloody hell, someone's stolen Norway!!!! My telescope hasn't "pulled it back over the horizon". What is this black magic?

*Tycho Crater* - A troll keeps asking why we can see it. It's about 85 km (53 mi) across. That's over 2000 square miles. If you do the maths, it's at the very limit of what we can see. But, it is a very bright spot surrounded by darker land - and it has "rays" that extend for hundreds of miles. So, you can just about see it with your naked eye. The troll (currently called "ThomasG10mtn") claims we shouldn't be able to see it, but I have no idea what their point is. I've tried to reason with them. *ThomasG10mtn* - we can see it, so *WHAT IS YOUR POINT?* The troll has posted the same question 4 times today. Each time they get a reasonable answer, they delete their original comment - so the thread disappears. *TL;DR:* Tycho is big, we can see it. The LM is small, so we can't.

@Antares8491

5 жыл бұрын

>> " _The troll (currently called "ThomasG10mtn") claims we shouldn't be able to see it, but I have no idea what their point is._ "

@RockBrentwood

5 жыл бұрын

No, f you do the math right - which means taking into account pixel resolution aliasing - you can achieve resolution better than your "limit" -- which means you're both wrong; and that even as you tap on his shoulder to call out the troll, there's another bigger hand tapping on your shoulder from behind. The relevant criterion is that given by the point spread function, *not* the pixel resolution. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-pixel_resolution

@ann_onn

4 жыл бұрын

*@​Antares849* Honestly, I have tried, many times. His/her point seems to be, we can see the Tycho crater therefore we should be able to see the lunar module. That makes no sense. Tycho is really big, the LM is really small. That's all there is to it. It is sorta "weird" that we can see Tycho from Earth, because it is right on the limit of angular resolution. Weird, but understandable - because tbh, we're not seeing just the crater; we're seeing the light reflected from that really anomalous bright area, and the "spokes" going out from it. We're not really "seeing" the crater itself. We can _just_ see Tycho. Which makes perfect sense, given the calculations of angular resolution. Seriously, do the math yourself - it's not even hard. We cannot see the LM. We'd need a telescope with a 100m aperture, and even then it'd be a vague dot. But the very best telescopes in the world today do not have a 100m aperture. They have about a 10m aperture. Fortunately, that does not matter. We can just go closer. LRO took great photos of all the Apollo landing sites. And, of course, we have thousands of photos from the original missions.

@ann_onn

4 жыл бұрын

*@​Rock Brentwood* c/f Dawes' limit. (Not criticizing. Just adding a quick mention.) For others reading this; if you squish photons too close together, they interfere with each other. That limits how far we can see. It's easy maths, really. To see something 10m (3') wide from 380,000 km (240,000 miles) requires an aperture (ie an opening, in a camera) about 100m (33') wide. The biggest that exist are about 10m (3'). That's all. Check what I said. Check the facts. BTW, you might see stuff about bigger telescopes.. but those are *radio* telescopes, not optical. Different thing. Also, you might ask me about interferometry. That's a fair point. It is _possible_ to use several telescopes and have a bigger lens. It's really, really hard. I mean... they recently spent 10 years getting a picture of a black hole.. which is very cool... We could, in theory, spend 10 years and billions on some kind of international collaboration to get a tiny, blurry picture of the LM. Does not matter, will not help. Crazy people will just claim it's fake, same as the thousands of existing pictures.

@Antares8491

4 жыл бұрын

@@ann_onn >> " _His/her point seems to be, we can see the Tycho crater therefore we should be able to see the lunar module. That makes no sense._ " > " _And, of course, we have thousands of photos from the original missions._ "

Thank you for the excellent breakdown love the new images at least they’re new to me

Great visual aids for the light/ resolution explanations. Good teachers are creative.

nice video. subscribed!

@waynusp1664

7 жыл бұрын

Billthesheepdog shill!

@Billthesheepdog

7 жыл бұрын

waynusp1664 LOL. You were let out of the basement? Are you over losing your saviors election? LOLOLOL Will you cry when she goes to jail? God is against your actions. wise up!

@rockinbobokkin7831

7 жыл бұрын

Billthesheepdog you're an idiot.

@Billthesheepdog

7 жыл бұрын

Lochen Dude and you must be one of those lost deniers of history. And a democrat millennial. Thats the Modus Operandi of those who try to insult those they dont agree with. You are so sad. heading to hell and dont even realize nor care. so sad.

@waynusp1664

7 жыл бұрын

...

For me it's the best explanation yet. Well done

Thank you Paul, the "Why can't we see..." is very well explained! Thank you also for all the videos.

@CS-wb8bt

4 жыл бұрын

Their are flat earthier’s all over the globe

@artyparis

4 жыл бұрын

S'il y a un complot, il est breton. La Bretagne est partout ;)

@Stefan-gh7xr

3 жыл бұрын

Because they never went to the moon! 🤣

@spacefree5183

3 жыл бұрын

They landed inside the moon cave.

@doozy284

3 жыл бұрын

All Lies

Your presentation skills are amazing! Thank you for the simple and direct explanation, really enjoyable and informative! 👍

@jimhaut480

10 ай бұрын

Bullshit

Loved how you're making fun of flat earthers xD

@martinewaeyenbergh9502

4 жыл бұрын

Liar!

@davidbarnhart6228

3 жыл бұрын

Feels bumpy to me.

@Sheldon.Williams

2 жыл бұрын

"Earth round, shoe flat? Something doesn't add up" - Flat Earther

Just found your channel and I find it amazing thank you.

Thanks for an incredible good channel. You are sooooo good at explaining and great presentation. Regards from Denmark

Great video again.