Who started World War II - Version I/III

To understand the tactics you need to understand who started and why he did.
[Only Germany is guilty, they start WW II , with some Soviet involvement.
Germany started and wanted Barbarossa.]
Tracks : WWII în color and HD, part 1 and parts of part IV.
I do not own, nor do I or intend to profit from this content whatsoever. "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

Пікірлер: 455

  • @scott1357
    @scott1357 Жыл бұрын

    An excellent and very "correct documentary" on the facts of world events that led to world war the sequel.

  • @dellingson4833
    @dellingson48335 жыл бұрын

    Want to get a real look at the war ? Watch, The greatest story never told.

  • @anthonygreene5560

    @anthonygreene5560

    4 жыл бұрын

    Shhh.... No one is to see this. It is very dangerous to let the brainwashed see a different view point. A view point that undermines the lies our schools desperately forced us to believe. How dare you offer this kind of knowledge. Who do you think you are? Does KZread know that doc is available?... Surely they will take it down. I seen it year's ago it can't possibly still be allowed to view. All you sheep don't watch the doc it will just offend you're little minds. Keep believing the rehashed BS you're schools beat you over the head with.

  • @joaohenriques5678

    @joaohenriques5678

    3 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/fpeur8WueNKwiLA.html

  • @titpisser

    @titpisser

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@anthonygreene5560 stop getting angry about it, not everyone sleeps

  • @derekcotton28
    @derekcotton284 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant war doc..

  • @samwhite4608
    @samwhite46083 жыл бұрын

    Very interesting What is the name of the original documentary?

  • @redzisan
    @redzisan8 жыл бұрын

    Who started the WW2? Of course it was Franek Dolas!

  • @qzg7857

    @qzg7857

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Radek Skrzypczak Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz

  • @imgonnafindyou5618

    @imgonnafindyou5618

    7 жыл бұрын

    Radek Skrzypczak shut the fuck up

  • @kineticmusiclines

    @kineticmusiclines

    7 жыл бұрын

    but he's right, Soviets in occupied Poland done an feature film about it ;-P

  • @thfzn
    @thfzn7 жыл бұрын

    Russians and Germans are equally to blame. It has never been fully explained by either the British and France as to why they declared war on Germany but not the USSR for invading Poland. USSR also invaded Finland and the Baltic states without the slightest protests from Great Britain and France.

  • @Pfsif

    @Pfsif

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@IanMalcolm-rw5pn Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania also.

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    thfzn well technically, the soviet union only invaded Poland weeks later. Britain and France dance book was allready full. Declaring war on the soviet Union after germany, that would have been suicidal. One could only hope that at one time this agreement between The Nazi’s and Stalin would blow up. Funny eh, it did! Politics and powerstruggles are a strange thing. You would expect it to be fair. It isnt, just as the rest of life isnt fair. So it isnt fair that the western allies didnt declare war on the Ussr after they marched into Poland, weeks after the Germans invaded. I’m afraid you arent going to get a full explanation. No one can give you one, you can only do it yourself. However, try not to fall for the idiocy of believing that it was all some kind of plot. Things simply happen. Germany was late to the party of being a united Empire. It never had the empire that France under Sun Kings and Napoleon had, and the Empire of Britain, or even the empires of Spain and Russia, and the colonies of Holland and Portugal, hell, even Belgium. Just some scraps in Africa and pacific islands and they promptly lost all in WWI. Apparently it was not that hard to whip up the people (under the circumstances of the late 1920 en 1930’s) to try out this Nationalist ‘socialistic’ populistic = Fascist leader and go and grap the empire they so thought to be rightly theirs. At the time the situation was what it was. Britain and France were militarily and economically weak. The US was looking inward. The Ussr was building up in power and grabbing here and there. Who dares wins was probably what Hitler thought. Cant afford to wait, also because the german economy was starting to show signs of overheating. Dont fall for the stupid ruse to see plots everywhere. Things happen because they do, there arent puppetmasters everywhere. Its just people doing opportunistic things. You know, human nature.

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    3 жыл бұрын

    I do understand that you require a government statement for such actions however you seem to be ignoring Britain's legitimate need to be safe and I'm sure that you will agree that Britain never wanted another war with the Sowjets..

  • @AlbertIsraeli

    @AlbertIsraeli

    Жыл бұрын

    Equally? So wars and surrenders between Germany, Britain, France and the rest of Europe, were started by USSR? I see modern European neo-nazi propaganda had brainwashed you clean of critical thinking. Congrats! 😢

  • @leojanuszewski1019

    @leojanuszewski1019

    8 ай бұрын

    It's simple: Nobody likes Germany.

  • @adrianniemiec8669
    @adrianniemiec86698 жыл бұрын

    All these comments are by people who learn history from Holywood Movies.

  • @icbm859

    @icbm859

    5 жыл бұрын

    adrian yep lol :)

  • @jimwatts7489

    @jimwatts7489

    5 жыл бұрын

    adrian niemiec, is that how you learned world history? I think you did.

  • @DawnOfTheDead991

    @DawnOfTheDead991

    5 жыл бұрын

    "Ninety percent of all Harveywood films about WW II made in the last fifty years are about the holocaust.' ----------That is a lie, but normal for a complete nazi scumbag like you.

  • @goe54

    @goe54

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@DawnOfTheDead991 Said the scumbag Bolshevik.

  • @KING-bt1tm
    @KING-bt1tm4 жыл бұрын

    When Britain and France invaded, conquered and committed genocide on foreign land, no one cared. But when Germany tried to take back land that was RIGHTFULLY theirs (such as the Polish corridor) everyone lost their shit. I don’t support the Nazis or what they did, I just think that it’s a bit hypocritical to portray them as the ultimate evil when allied countries had done the same things that the Nazis did.

  • @leojanuszewski1019

    @leojanuszewski1019

    8 ай бұрын

    Yeah but Germany sucks ballz.

  • @guillermojensen1332
    @guillermojensen13325 жыл бұрын

    "Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to." -(Polish Marshal Rydz-Smigly as reported in the Daily Mail, August 6th, 1939)

  • @leojanuszewski1019

    @leojanuszewski1019

    8 ай бұрын

    Lol...yeah...Poland started WWII.

  • @orley104
    @orley1047 жыл бұрын

    @ 31.01 does anybody know who the Standard bearer holding the flag is? He has a Hitler moustache and is in all the footage of Flag blessing ceremonies with the Blood Banner from the failed Puscht. Obviously in the SSLAH. He is always there carrying the ceremonial banner when AH is on parade. Little help anyone please? Orley.

  • @DaveSCameron
    @DaveSCameron2 жыл бұрын

    These Great British docs are sublime if you can find the other two from this 3parter on this increasingly dodgy platform.

  • @jumpinjehoshaphat9075
    @jumpinjehoshaphat9075 Жыл бұрын

    47:02 This is strange. It purports to be a map for March 1941 and yet France is shown unoccupied. No mention is made of knocking France out of the war a year earlier or of the Battle of Britain and then transferring troops East.

  • @goatwarrior3570
    @goatwarrior35708 жыл бұрын

    I like the part in this documentary where the gloss over the battle of France, The Battle of Britain, the Greco Italian war....Pretty much everything that happened between 1939 and Barbarossa...

  • @aksekhiddelll8900

    @aksekhiddelll8900

    3 жыл бұрын

    if by gloss over you mean not mention at all, then yeah

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    2 жыл бұрын

    There is another two part's...

  • @duaneoldfield

    @duaneoldfield

    Жыл бұрын

    You should make your own documentary covering that part of the war and post a link here in the comments

  • @thoriumenegry9382
    @thoriumenegry93826 жыл бұрын

    I like the voice of the narrator, the documentary is professionally made, however the version of the events given is hopelessly outdated. Victor Suvorov (The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start WWII) and others (Mark Solonin, Vladimir Beshanov, Socolov) demonstrated that the world war was mainly instigated by the USSR.

  • @titpisser

    @titpisser

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yes it is not luga but I think it is robert powell off of the detectives and holby

  • @robsmissen4

    @robsmissen4

    2 жыл бұрын

    Some say it started in Spain, others in China. I expect Stalin expected a World War, and the Soviet Union was invaded by multiple Imperialist countries prior to WW2 but perhaps you could summarize the theses of the references you cite 😀

  • @RangerB66

    @RangerB66

    6 ай бұрын

    @@robsmissen4"Faustian Bargain" by Ian Ona Johnson is an excellent modern source material, and you can see several interviews with him on KZread; just google 'Faustian Bargain'. Dr Johnson explains in extreme detail with sources (mostly from TsAmo archives in Russia, before they were closed), how Russia enabled the Germans - through the Treaty of Rapallo - by working closely with Germany on arms developments, doctrine, tactics, and methods of production of modern weapons and warfare, all the while skirting the Treaty of Versailles inspectors placed in Germany to prevent German rearmament. In fact up until the moment of Barbarossa, Russia was providing the Nazis with vast quantities of raw materials that the Germans then turned into bombs and bullets used against the Anglo-French allies in west Europe in 1940. Very interesting listen.

  • @papasha408
    @papasha4087 жыл бұрын

    This can best be described as the 'Kosher Seal of Approval' version of the Second World War.

  • @ilias_p

    @ilias_p

    4 жыл бұрын

    @rdmo83 because europe is importing massive numbers of muslim migrants..

  • @ralphbernhard1757
    @ralphbernhard17578 жыл бұрын

    The main cause of WW2 was the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact in 1939. The secret protocol was the real reason it was signed in the first place. The secret protocol was a division of East Europe into spheres of interest, and Stalin greedily accepted. He greedily accepted, since that meant he could have Finland, Eastern Poland, the Baltic States and Moldavia (from Romania). Stalin knew perfectly well that signing it would leave him with a common border with Nazi Germany. He did it anyway. He did it voluntarily, no duress, no force applied from outside. The Non-aggression part was merely a pretext (which could be publicly announced, to act as a smoke screen to hide the secret clause) since both dictators signatures weren't worth the ink it was written with. The pact between two mass murderers enabled everything which followed after that, and was therefore the main reason which allowed Hitler to invade Poland, AND Stalin to attack the Balkan States, Poland, and Finland. Kinda embarrassing, having an 'ally' Stalin, aka the 'cute Uncle Joe', which caused WW2.

  • @jimwatts7489

    @jimwatts7489

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes Joe, but who was controlling Russia? Who is the puppet master(s) behind the curtain? Who financed Stalin's overthrown of the Russian Monarchy? Who compelled a once christian man (Stalin) to throw away his beliefs and become an evil puppet?

  • @davecopp9356

    @davecopp9356

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jimwatts7489 The criminal terrorist organization ADL will make sure that the truth will not come out.

  • @WR12MSH
    @WR12MSH8 жыл бұрын

    If anyone can tell me the fanfare in the background at 8:45, I'd appreciate it.

  • @geoffholmes7291

    @geoffholmes7291

    Жыл бұрын

    It's been quite a while and I'm going to guess you have found the answer. A glance at the crowd and setting, the narrative accompanied tells us, almost without question, the arena of fanatic cheering crowds is footage from the 1936 Olympics hosted by Germany while the Nazi's were in power ... Many interesting events during that time...

  • @WR12MSH

    @WR12MSH

    Жыл бұрын

    @@geoffholmes7291 Nope, never did. I had completely forgotten that I posted this. It isn't the only one, there are plenty of other musical pieces from videos I've wanted to know the name of.

  • @michaellad9714
    @michaellad97143 жыл бұрын

    Why is KZread not censoring number one but sensors numbe two try to watch episode two and they want all my details ffs

  • @kevingr7
    @kevingr78 жыл бұрын

    Wow I actually read through every single comment here and it was quite interesting to be honest. You are all passionate about history and a lot of you seem to have a pretty nuanced view of the war. A few thoughts: 1. History is written by the victor (as Im sure we can all agree). This means that if you grew up in Russia/the former USSR you will have a "russian perspective". And if you grew up in the west as I did (Norway), you will have an "allied perspective". This is ofcourse not always the case if you have conducted your own research, but your basis from the indoctrination system is still very much there. 2. The aftermath of WW2 was filled with anti-german propaganda who borders on the insane. The de-nazification as it was called seeked to destroy German moral, self-worth, ideology, and in many many cases destroy the Germans themselves. I dont have the excact figure in mind right now (no one probably even knows for sure) but the sheer number of Germans executed, imprisoned and/or deported are mind blowing. Do a quick google search and you'll see what i mean. 3. The demonization of nazis, and Hitler in particular, really has went beyond ridicilous. Just for clarification, since Im sure I will be attacked and called a nazi for this: I dont support national-socialism or Fascism in any form. However, I think it is pretty biased to point at the Nuremberg laws of 1933 as some super-racist-out of this world-once in a lifetime type of thing. Please consider: Did America not have similar laws regarding black people? Did France and Britain not rule over hundreds of millions of people in Africa, in India and in south-east Asia? Hell in my own country it was inscribed in the constitution that jews were not permitted or welcome in the country (Norway). Again, Im not saying people in Germany at this time weren't racist. Im simply saying that discrimination laws were widespread throughout the whole world, and that the biggest sinners (just in terms of how many people it affected) were the big colonial powers. 4. After the war ended the propaganda machine shifted their attention to the USSR and the demonization of anything Russian/Communist (im writing it like this because the two were practicly identical terms in the eyes of the west), began. Again for clarification I am by no means a supporter of communism or Stalin. However, I think the west are as much to blame (if not more) for the prolonged cold-war we all had to endure. Remember: The USSR were to a large extent war-torn, ravashed and destroyed. Im sure you all can appreciate the horrible effects war has had on American soldiers returning from Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. A whole generation of fighting age men suffering from PTSD and other mental scars from the war. Now imagine living in the USSR during the 1940s and having to return to normal life afterwards. Differently to America, where you actually had to GO to war, the people living in the USSR felt the full hell of war every day for 4 years. Can you really expect the people of the USSR to have ANY sympathy with allies who didnt even have to fight a war? 5. Every country involved in this war, or at least every relevant participant, commited horrible atrocites. It's a reason the BBC in their famous documentary series quite accurately refer to it as Apocalpyse: WW2. Cause Im sure that's how it must have felt. Thanks for keeping it civil and interesting guys.

  • @andrewmattox1233

    @andrewmattox1233

    5 жыл бұрын

    If a waring country doesn't have enough food/medicine for its own troops, then its POWs definitely aren't going to get food/medicine. But this fact is lost in the propaganda.

  • @SeverinLudwig

    @SeverinLudwig

    3 жыл бұрын

    One of the best and nuanced comments I read about WW2 on youtube.

  • @xrayban2

    @xrayban2

    3 жыл бұрын

    2. Does it surprises you that russians seeked revenge ? About other countries I don't know that they killed german civilians, have you proof of that ? 3. Ok about racism being everywhere, but Staline and Hitler were mass murderous dictators and acted way beyond "discrimination". 4. I'm not sure what are you trying to say. 5. Again between whatever "horrible atrocities" and global mass murders of jews and russians there is a huge gap.

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    2 жыл бұрын

    🔚🔔

  • @JaviProMaster

    @JaviProMaster

    7 ай бұрын

    Very true

  • @ralphbernhard1757
    @ralphbernhard17578 жыл бұрын

    Lots of inaccuracies and important facts omitted. For example, the USA never ratified and signed the Treaty of Versailles, but chose to make a separate peace with Germany. The Baltic States were not a result of Versailles either. They declared their own independence.

  • @FGG79able

    @FGG79able

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not true....based on the treaty in Versailles, Jews in Poland tried to establish Jewish Territorial autonomy in Poland.

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    2 жыл бұрын

    Jesus when will people accept that there's no One Doc Has All , nor a book. Cherry picking your pet points is futile, get a grip and behave*

  • @svs8909
    @svs89098 жыл бұрын

    WHERE DID THE MONEY COME FROM ??????????????????????

  • @laylawright4546

    @laylawright4546

    6 жыл бұрын

    Ze jooz

  • @DawnOfTheDead991

    @DawnOfTheDead991

    5 жыл бұрын

    There is no point in trying to reason with Nazoid trash like you all. Everything revolves aoound to blaming the Jews for everything in ur little minds

  • @Set-ri6rs
    @Set-ri6rs5 жыл бұрын

    while i accept that the leaders of Europe failed us all (without exception) and so by doing turned Europe into a tinderbox, only one man chose to throw a match onto it.

  • @Razzle_Dazzle-
    @Razzle_Dazzle- Жыл бұрын

    We have to look at the historical inaccuracies at the beginning of this video. The Baltics and Poland were not new countries of the Austro-Hungary breakup. They declared their own independence after the Russian Empire collapsed

  • @user-nk9jh4ib2e
    @user-nk9jh4ib2e5 жыл бұрын

    WWII started by Munich agreement. Nazi Germany signed agreement with western countries to start WWII. Poland was involved indirectly. Ambassador Lukashevich discussed with French government and got approval to invade Chehoslowakia. USSR unfortunately did not help Chehoslowakian brothers to retain independence from rude Polish invasion!

  • @zbigniewbiernacki3682
    @zbigniewbiernacki36824 жыл бұрын

    March into Poland took one month. Not too swift.

  • @TheTamriel
    @TheTamriel9 жыл бұрын

    Me gusta Saludos desde Argentina

  • @Devsfan202

    @Devsfan202

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Ana Surena Vandenberg dos Santos Hola, Que tal!

  • @laylawright4546

    @laylawright4546

    6 жыл бұрын

    Saludos desde estados unidos

  • @seanengelsen7267
    @seanengelsen72675 жыл бұрын

    If only Poland would've just gave up Danzig.

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    5 жыл бұрын

    Sean Engelsen : If my nan was my granddad...

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sean Engelsen sure, that was the last thing on Hitler’s list. After that, no more demands. LOL

  • @musaaydogan4292
    @musaaydogan42926 жыл бұрын

    This documentary is on netflix

  • @andrewdoolittle5336
    @andrewdoolittle53368 жыл бұрын

    Austria got screwed, Germany got blamed...and a lot of over confident "conquered" turned out to be wrong. Hence "World War 1: the dynamic addition."

  • @rydlewskiserge4225
    @rydlewskiserge42258 жыл бұрын

    Not a word about invasion of poland by Nazis and Soviets.A pity when pretending to explain who started WWII.

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    2 жыл бұрын

    Crazy hey, try watching the remaining 2 parts of this 3 part series!

  • @ancientnumbat4631
    @ancientnumbat46317 жыл бұрын

    Could someone please tell me when Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia were ever parts of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Also, most of Poland, like the Baltic states, was part of the Russian Empire.

  • @yjedxz

    @yjedxz

    2 жыл бұрын

    idk sorry

  • @TheBalterok
    @TheBalterok7 жыл бұрын

    Stalin was preparing an invasion and 'liberation" of Europe ready to start in July 1941. Germany was helped by Stalin to train their pilots, build their army even before Hitler became chancellor. Hitler was viewed by Stalin as an icebreaker in Europe - a world revolution was a goal of bolsheviks from the very revolution in 1917. Who started World War 3? - Stalin. If he would not come too close to the Romanian oil fields without which Germany could not fight, history could have been very different. this scared off Hitler and plan Barbarossa was conceived having no other option to thwart the Russian aggression.

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    TheBalterok I agree Stalin wanted more. But to have masterminded this? You mistake the chance for Germany to train in Russia for what it was. It was a cooperation to develop materiel like tanks and planes and army tactics. Both benefitted from it, pure as simple as that. You guys see plots everywhere. Sure there were agenda’s, but stop this compulsive conspiracy thinking. Stalin did just what he thought was advantageous at the moment. Just like signing the von ribbentrop pact. And same for Hitler. Neither Hitler nor Stalin foresaw what would be the outcome of Barbarossa. Stop seeing conspiracies and masterplots everywhere!

  • @TheBalterok
    @TheBalterok7 жыл бұрын

    the notion that Stalin's army was unprepared for war is silly, has no ground, doesn't rely on facts and have been engineered by russian propagandists of the time. Stalin had many times more tanks, heavy tanks, which Hitler didn't, Stalin had ten times more fighter planes and bombers, Red Army began quiet mobilization in 1939 lowering the conscription age to 18. Red army, heavily concentrated at the borders in June 1941, numbered 5,5 million men, and that is only the first strategic echelon. Hitler's war against Russia was a desperate measure to stop Stalin's aggression and his ultimate aim - communist domination of Europe and then the world, the sole aim of bolshevik revolution in 1917.

  • @davecopp9356

    @davecopp9356

    2 жыл бұрын

    Very well said and researched. Thank you.

  • @svs8909
    @svs89098 жыл бұрын

    CHAMBERLIN WAS THE BIGGEST ASS EVER BORN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ATPMolloy1

    @ATPMolloy1

    8 жыл бұрын

    Don't be so upset, you are close and with practice you will make it to biggest !

  • @KermitFrazierdotcom
    @KermitFrazierdotcom4 жыл бұрын

    Stalin was such a Nice Guy! He "Safe Guarded" Spain's Gold. (until such time as they see their ears) They're Still Looking.

  • @millymints
    @millymints2 жыл бұрын

    anyone else watching this for school

  • @SeamHead33
    @SeamHead333 жыл бұрын

    WW2 was Man vs. Evil and Man lost

  • @derekhugh
    @derekhugh Жыл бұрын

    Part II was cancelled... by the culprits

  • @hermanbruner9406
    @hermanbruner94062 жыл бұрын

    Manchuria that when it started

  • @organicdudranch
    @organicdudranch7 жыл бұрын

    I would start with the truth of the danzig corridor. Lloyd george said "the TOV will lead to another war and danzig will be the spark" or something close to that. the veil is complete and those who see thru it will be hated ,be careful.

  • @stevo-rk8lc

    @stevo-rk8lc

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes and Britain could of gave Hitler Danzig,but being war munger's,they told Poland to not give in,and the Polish we're wanna be war munger's,they actually thought they would defeat Germany,and be in Berlin in 3 weeks! Boy we're they wrong!

  • @willemvanlent6955
    @willemvanlent69555 жыл бұрын

    And STILL the real reasons, and whom started it, are again NOT mentioned in this documentary!! Wake up people and watch the truth in the documentary's "The Greatest Story Never Told!!"

  • @johnsmith1474

    @johnsmith1474

    5 жыл бұрын

    Just come out with your rancid bigotry rather than play acting your innuendo. Coward! No, worse: stupid coward.

  • @johnsmith1474

    @johnsmith1474

    5 жыл бұрын

    @rdmo83 - I would say you should decide how it stands as a "dog whistle" for yourself. Check out the movie in question by looking at the review ratings page for it: www.imdb.com/title/tt3526810/reviews?ref_=tt_ql_3 I don't know your investigation skills but you are smart enough to ask the right question, so use the filters at the top of the page to look at the reviews from best to worst, and in reverse to see the dichotomy. Note the disparity, fans love this thing, others call it a piece of shit. I think you can figure it out via the reviews, their tone, intelligence and writing style if this movie is a hot item for bigots. Note, the average rating is high, because it does in fact attract lunatics to cheer about it. Another like movie is the famous "Birth of a Nation" which is about a glorification of the birth of the KKK. It took America by storm when it was produced way back in 1915. Check it's reviews: www.imdb.com/title/tt0004972/reviews?ref_=tt_ql_3 Again, certain people treat it like holy scripture, some like toilet paper. It's an early classic and it is true that in 1915 America KKK was not yet a dirty acronym. A lot of really vile beliefs were quite normal at various times & places, we hung witches in Massachusetts in 1700, in Britain a man could sell his wife in the public square as late as 1875. History is full of evidence of how rotten we are, so in a sense antisemitic people liking a Hitler movie is not all that outrageous, it's just statistically going to happen. To actually understand the 1st half of the 20th Century you have to read about 50 serious books not watch some movie. We all help create justice, I'm not a big fan of for instance Israel, but I bust hard on the antiSemites all the time, for the sake of justice. I have a ton of reading of history and religion and such with which to ID the dopes, they do tend to talk in code. A fun method I use here is to ask, "Can you tell me about the Rothschilds?" Then they open up and give the Jewish banker conspiracy meme, and then I tell them, "I ask that question to expose ignorant bigots!" Feel free to carry on that comedy based tradition of busting balls. P.S. the Rothschilds were the richest family ever in Britain owing about 0.6% of all the money in the country, and they did do it by banking and the bond market. But they got there by being the most trustworthy bankers in Europe, not by stealing anything.

  • @leojanuszewski1019

    @leojanuszewski1019

    8 ай бұрын

    Silence Kraut!

  • @mikhailiagacesa3406
    @mikhailiagacesa34068 жыл бұрын

    "The swelling of the British and French Empires weakened them." Is the narrator serious?!

  • @titpisser

    @titpisser

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yes a very serious man, sir robert powell. You should check his supreme work in the 'Detectives' bbc tv series

  • @mikhailiagacesa3406

    @mikhailiagacesa3406

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@titpisser Certainly they(Anglo-France) didn't think so. One thing that is never mentioned concurrent with the Czech crisis is the Arab revolt. Chamberlain needed to rebuild his military, and the Arabs were faffing it. A large overseas empire for France and the UK helped to defray costs. I believe that's why they both renigged on the treaty of london 1915, denying the Italians a balken empire. Powell's Hindsight is 20/20.

  • @apsarator
    @apsarator8 жыл бұрын

    Cui Bono?

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yes, Cui? I know! Land owners of present day war cemeteries! They must have gotten a good price for those plots!

  • @charles-qm4ss
    @charles-qm4ss4 жыл бұрын

    I liked it but too much gore 😮

  • @supiegamer6107
    @supiegamer61078 жыл бұрын

    This ain't fair I'm from Poland and our country always gets attacked

  • @PanZarowka

    @PanZarowka

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Marcos 989 From ages being stuck between two bigger players - Germany and Russia. Ask Mongolia why they aren't an empire ;) (I know they used to be, so as Poland in past)

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    Mark989 what would they have had to learn earlier then? To lay flat when Germans or Russians trample you?

  • @elfrad1714
    @elfrad17145 жыл бұрын

    True, there were substantial German minorities in Poland and Czechoslovakia. But they only turned to the Nazis after losing the minority rights granted to them.

  • @maximojoe7398
    @maximojoe7398 Жыл бұрын

    The treaty of Versailles is 100% responsible for WW2....period

  • @Greeneyes02
    @Greeneyes026 жыл бұрын

    MY GRAT GRAMPA DIED IN WW2 WHY DID HE

  • @mikeaguilar5764
    @mikeaguilar57646 ай бұрын

    Benito Mussolini, the originator of the duck face pose.

  • @deanmeadows3529
    @deanmeadows35294 жыл бұрын

    It was world war 1 Germany never got over the kaiser surrendering. The British said never another war, resentment continued for 20.years in Germany then Hitler came along, the rest is history as they say

  • @ralphbernhard1757
    @ralphbernhard17573 жыл бұрын

    At Versailles, the policies of "balancing powers" were made in the back rooms... Two great powers were not invited (Germany and SU). Two were dissed (Italy and Japan). *The only *time bomb* was the changing reality of changing balance of power.* Versailles only controlled *one side* of that scale... That Germany was "allowed" to rearm during the 1930's (or "closing an eye to Hitler re-arming") was an effect of a policy dictated to the continent by London, and put into effect, yet again, at Versailles: Balance of Power. So the later Germany/Hitler re-arming and standing up to rising communism suited the lords in London just fine... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_five-year_plan [Note, the term "power" encompasses a wide range of qualities from population growth, level of education (including scientists, mechanics, and engineers), scientific advances, level of industrialisation, urbanisation/i.e. advanced society, infrastructure projects, increased GDP, and yes...soldiers, tanks, guns, airplanes...] As the SU grew, *and grew, AND GREW,* so did Germany. Perfectly fine, if you ask the lords... It was "allowed" to "balance out" communism. What could possibly go wrong? Why complain about it in hindsight?

  • @gordonfrickers5592
    @gordonfrickers55925 жыл бұрын

    We beat the Germans in 1918 and they have hardly bothered us since then...

  • @gullybull5568

    @gullybull5568

    3 жыл бұрын

    says the Zionists ?

  • @Pfsif
    @Pfsif4 жыл бұрын

    WW2 Europe was just business, British style.

  • @TVNetworld

    @TVNetworld

    4 жыл бұрын

    you say it right

  • @rhysnichols8608

    @rhysnichols8608

    4 жыл бұрын

    Cilcito 58 Germany never threatened our empire or people. Wake up

  • @wardyyliv2694
    @wardyyliv26945 жыл бұрын

    world war ii was actually started by adolf hitler asking for the british to join him but we said no and then the german or the british said lets fight for it or something

  • @gullybull5568

    @gullybull5568

    3 жыл бұрын

    ww2 started to create a home for jews who really dont want to live in Isreal in Peace.

  • @gullybull5568

    @gullybull5568

    3 жыл бұрын

    the jews - NON hebrews. FORCed to wear Star of David. why? to ACCEPT ZIONISM. and go LIVE in the State of Isreal - their NEW HOME created in Palestine. - BUT USA JEWS wanted MORE. TOTAL destruction of ENGLAND GERMANY - europe totally marxist communized. NO GOD.

  • @larrytow806
    @larrytow8065 жыл бұрын

    The driver if the arch dukes car that got assinated in Austria cause he took a wrong turn.

  • @stevo-rk8lc

    @stevo-rk8lc

    5 жыл бұрын

    That was WW1

  • @tlk0216
    @tlk0216Ай бұрын

    Technically speaking the americans and also the british

  • @JUAN_OLIVIER
    @JUAN_OLIVIER6 жыл бұрын

    Short answer, Britain and France.

  • @amonbargo
    @amonbargo9 жыл бұрын

    the presented picture of poland as only a victim is plain wrong, poland was one of the most agressive countries in europe, but ,thats just one of many misrepresentations in this documentary.

  • @puuuuuuch

    @puuuuuuch

    9 жыл бұрын

    amonbargo Yep, just look at their ambitions to annex Lithuanian territories

  • @mountainhobo

    @mountainhobo

    9 жыл бұрын

    amonbargo Yep, the filthy Poland dared to beat Soviet Union after being attacked in 1920. Your heart must still bleed over that one.

  • @amonbargo

    @amonbargo

    9 жыл бұрын

    mountainhobo dont worry about my heart, mate.

  • @jogo7759

    @jogo7759

    9 жыл бұрын

    mountainhobo fact is Poland had the largest tank army in the world next to ussr, and had more infantrymen than the USA! If Germany didn't attack them they most certainly would have struck a deal with the USSR and attacked. Poland was indeed flirting an alliance with Stalin.

  • @mountainhobo

    @mountainhobo

    9 жыл бұрын

    jo go Poland a deal with Stalin? ROFLMAO. This has just crossed into surrealism. Do you have even a basic grasp on history? Even the tiniest? Good God, it's like talking to a 5-year old who repeats something he heard from a town drunk. No, there is no point in dragging on this absurd conversation.

  • @FirebrandVOCALS
    @FirebrandVOCALS6 жыл бұрын

    Homer Simpson started the war it would appear 😶

  • @daytona1212
    @daytona12128 жыл бұрын

    Nice piece of fiction. The winner writes his history.

  • @deenakurian9766

    @deenakurian9766

    8 жыл бұрын

    I meant that victors have the ability to write history as they please. they can blame all their problems on the losers and cover up their crmes

  • @deenakurian9766

    @deenakurian9766

    8 жыл бұрын

    I meant that victors have the ability to write history as they please. they can blame all their problems on the losers and cover up their crmes

  • @c4rl1n1969
    @c4rl1n19694 жыл бұрын

    You keep like finking how I wud feel if I was there prolly scared

  • @TheUSACitizen1
    @TheUSACitizen14 жыл бұрын

    German and Russia started WW2 in 1939. Atacked Poland !!

  • @Crashed131963
    @Crashed1319637 жыл бұрын

    Why would Italy even want to invade Ethiopia? Today nobody would want that hole if it handed itself over freely.

  • @sofiabello273
    @sofiabello2733 жыл бұрын

    oh m g! I just need to know who started the war and why? HISTORY HOMEWORK!

  • @DaveSCameron

    @DaveSCameron

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank god for you !

  • @SAT186971
    @SAT1869715 жыл бұрын

    The sins started ww2 as every war

  • @SAT186971

    @SAT186971

    5 жыл бұрын

    Same will be and with ww3

  • @DawnOfTheDead991

    @DawnOfTheDead991

    5 жыл бұрын

    Another Nazi cretin barfs on U Toob

  • @bootdriven
    @bootdriven5 жыл бұрын

    If Czech and Polish leaders will play waiting game and German speaking territories to Germany, millions and millions life's will be save. British should never start the War!!

  • @pharos670

    @pharos670

    4 жыл бұрын

    And British never started the war

  • @gullybull5568

    @gullybull5568

    3 жыл бұрын

    Britain wanted war. Church Hill the zionist was in bed with the snakes.

  • @gullybull5568

    @gullybull5568

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@pharos670 says a zionist na ZIon ist.

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    Churchill was not part pf the government when the war started. He was appointed minister of navy on September 1st after the invasion of Poland had begun. Germany declared war on Poland (well, invaded without declaring war), knowing France and Britain had pledged to declare war. Something similar had taken place in 1914, maybe you should read some more history, it tends to repeat itself. There Russia had backed Serbia, and alliance ties drew in Germany and France and later Britain when Germany invaded Belgium (which it generally does to attack France). At the eve of WWII, war was probably the last thing ‘Britain wanted’. It could ill afford it, would not want to repeat WWI and had a pretty poor army. It had nothing to win and everything to lose. The only reason it went to war was because it had drawn the line somewhere between germany gobbling up Chzech and Poland. Have you actually seen the documentary? In effect Britain did lose pretty much in WWII. It lost its empire, its standing as a world power and the war cost them hugely economically. Germany was late to the party of being a united Empire. It never had the empire that France under Sun Kings and Napoleon had, and the Empire of Britain, or even the empires of Spain and Russia, and the colonies of Holland and Portugal, hell, even Belgium. Just some scraps in Africa and pacific islands and they promptly lost all in WWI. Apparently it was not that hard to whip up the people (under the circumstances of the late 1920 en 1930’s) to go and grap the empire they so thought to be rightly theirs. You could say, WWII ‘happened’. There were a lot of factors in play. Not least the desire of german people to have an empire. But the fact is, germany invaded Poland, a sovereign nation, colluding with Stalin, knowing it would get war with France and Britain. But did it ANYWAY.

  • @TheKamperfoelie

    @TheKamperfoelie

    3 жыл бұрын

    Gully Bull someone who points out that Britain didnt start the war is a zionist in your book? Then the world must be literally full of them, again, in your view.

  • @TheBalterok
    @TheBalterok7 жыл бұрын

    this documentary has no valid facts about the Red Army of the time, concerning tanks it did have more than 20,000, but to call them outdated is a bit an exaggeration, it had heavy armored tanks which hitler didn't at the time, and the cannons of calibers far exceeding what was on the light german tanquettes. 2 million men that the documentary claims was the size of red army before the invasion is an invalid understatement. 2 million men were taken captive in the first weeks of war according even to Soviet propaganda.

  • @cutiepie45
    @cutiepie456 жыл бұрын

    England

  • @Elanus19
    @Elanus195 жыл бұрын

    wtf is up with this comment section

  • @aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS
    @aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS Жыл бұрын

    Nazis were not Right Wing. They were Leftist just like all the Socialist party. His was a National Socialism. Being a Nationalists doesn't make one Right Wing. Ghandi and Mandela were both Nationalists and no one would ever call them, "Right Wing." The Nazis were Leftist Statists, just like Communists and Mussolini. Mussolini started out a Communist. In Europe, they called Nazis Right Wing to differentiate them from the other Socialists, like the Commies. It had nothing to do with American Right Wing, but it was in the 60's grafted onto the American Right Wing. Nazis believed in government control, almost all the Socialist planks. Unlike the American Right, which believes in a small, limited government, with maximum, personal rights. Something like all Socialists, do not believe in. The Nazis actually drew inspiration from the Southern Democrats, with their racist policies. (All the Southern Democrats, died Democrats. Another Leftist trope. Progressives would never let Republicans join them, neither would Republicans let racist Southern Democrats, join their party) So many lies.

  • @mikeuk8486
    @mikeuk84865 жыл бұрын

    I cannot believe what I'm reading in comments, Poland to treat Germans bad? If you talk about it read it first, german people where in Polish cities just becouse they attacked Poland 120 years before ww1 with Russia and Austria making Poland desapere from maps for 120years Poland has gain independence in WW1 second war started after signing secret pakt with Russia to extinct Poland once for good. You are all here speaking your language becouse brave Poland, Britain and USA...

  • @w.allencaddell6421
    @w.allencaddell64213 жыл бұрын

    Well, the losers of wars has to bare responsibility. Then, England and France "slept" while the Nazis rebuilt Germany. The Nazis even had military parades, inviting England and France. Europe saw what AH was doing simply by banning other political parties. And the last, the book Mein Kampf, explains exactly who AH was and what his goals were. Germany had NOTHING of a military in 1931. AH becomes Chancellor in 1933. Japan had already started WW2 long before Germany, but nobody cared. So England and France, then later the USA got a boot in the face. After WW2, the 3 let Communism gain more power first in China, spread to Korea and Vietnam, Laos and others. Communism is still here because the USA didn't do anything about it.

  • @ralfrath699
    @ralfrath6998 жыл бұрын

    What is war?? War is politics - read clausewitz! So if here people who argue in ww2 was this good for Germany or that - in ww2 was this good for Britain and the USA or not - you have not undstand what war is and means! Again and again war is politics that was made in ww2 to change our world until today! If you ask me why Germany dominates Europe and the World then this means only germany had won ww2 - not militarily but politically!

  • @bootdriven
    @bootdriven5 жыл бұрын

    They should give what Germany wanted, and millions human lives will be save!!

  • @johnsmith1474

    @johnsmith1474

    5 жыл бұрын

    You stupid idiot, he wanted 100,000,000 dead between Warsaw and Moscow.

  • @scott1357
    @scott1357 Жыл бұрын

    The Japanese

  • @cosmet7595
    @cosmet75957 жыл бұрын

    Germany.

  • @presleybaguiwan1954
    @presleybaguiwan19544 жыл бұрын

    Japan started ww2

  • @sinisamajetic
    @sinisamajetic8 жыл бұрын

    yeah very bias, but not only that, I'm annoyed with things like: "Stalin was glad that Hitler and Mussolini were occupied (busy) in Spain so he can prepare his military forces" how could they know that? and even if it's documented and true, why would Stalin believe that 12 000 troops engagement would keep Hitler occupied so much so that he forgets everything else?, is that means that if they were not "occupied", Stalin wouldn't be able to build his military? What's the true?

  • @michaelot77

    @michaelot77

    8 жыл бұрын

    +sinisa majetic None of the history books explains why Germany all the sudden took its attention off of invading England and decided to invade the Soviet Union. The conventional answer has always been: Hitler was just insane to attack Stalin because of the vast expanse of Russia would be too much for the wehrmacht to conquer and occupy. If you read Chief Culprit by Victor Suvorov, it answers the question of why Hitler turned East. Stalin from 39-41, had moved five million soldiers to the Western border districts along with some ten thousand tanks and aircraft of various type. Ammunition stock piles, supply depots and airfields were being massively built up near the border with Germany. Stalin's winter war with Finland in 1940, the annexing of the Baltic States and seizure of Romanian territory near the Ploesti oil fields forced Hitler to respond with a large military presence in the East to counter these moves. With all of that happening while Hitler's attention was focused against England, its no wonder why he turned his efforts to the East. Neither Stalin or Hitler could had maintained such huge forces in the area indefinitely. A war was inevitable at that point and it was a matter of who would be ready to preempt the other.

  • @maximtyo2625

    @maximtyo2625

    8 жыл бұрын

    +michaelot77 Victor Suvorov is Lier! Traitor to his Country! Not one word that comes from his mouth can be trusted! Why are you concentrating on 1939-41 period only? When did Hitler became official head of State of Germany? Smart people in Soviet Union suspected they will have to fight fascism in 1934. And they became sure of it after Munchen. And Soviet Union began preparation for DEFENCE! Now you say Stalin concentrated over 5 million of troops on western border. But that the number of soldiers in whole of Red Army at that time. Do you think they got them all in one part of country leaving other parts unattended? By the way these 5 million included everybody: infantry, tankers, pilots, artillerymen, cavalry, communication, driver and cooks etc/etc. Yes, largest numbers were in western districts. But for defence purposes. And yes - by 1942 Soviet Union would be ready ... for DEFENCE! The border fortifications would have been finished, the new more modern weapons would be produced and delivered to troops which would learn how to use them.... Why do you think 1941 was so disastrous for USSR? Because Russia could hardly defend her self little less attack somebody!

  • @maximtyo2625

    @maximtyo2625

    8 жыл бұрын

    +michaelot77 Everybody know about Stalin's purges of 1937-39. But do you know against who they were directed? Follows of Trocki who dreamed of World Revolution. And follows of "Red Napoleon" Tukhachevsky who thought they could used Red Army to achieve said World Revolution. Stalin was building Socialism in Russia and did not plan export revolution anywhere. That's why got rid of all those who said he betrayed Communistic Movement. Yes Western Propaganda says he Bloody monster because of those purges. And yes they are partially right when they say he did it to strengthen his power. But for other part West should be grateful to Stalin for containing Revolutionary Thread. And I think its proof enough of his peaceful intentions!

  • @michaelot77

    @michaelot77

    8 жыл бұрын

    Maxim Tyo I mention the 39-41 period of the war because those are the most critical years in which Germany substantially won and then lost the conflict when Hitler stuck the Soviet Union. For example, to the victor belongs the spoils and version of history is dictated by the winner. Additionally, rightly so due to the German / Soviet war being the largest conflict in human history. However, more than 70 years have passed since and the new information coming to light about the events leading up to Barbarossa are compelling or at least worth looking at in a serious manner. I agree with the numbers you put forth in Soviet man power gathered but the Soviets also had 17 million trained reservists they could call on in addition to the 5.5 million men in active service. Also from 39-41 the Soviet military expanded from 1 million to 5 million in all arms and most of that force was placed on the western border areas. I agree that both Germany and the Soviet Union knew that there would be a conflict between them at some point and both countries mobilized its armed forces as fast as possible for the coming conflict. I will also agree that Suvorov is a traitor to his country but does that make his thesis wrong? Most, if not all military historians will agree that massive mobilization in itself is an act of aggression and that war is always inevitable as a result. Suvorov, indicates in his book that mobilization is like a military pregnancy that always gives birth to a war. Suvorov also brings to light that millions of enlistments in the Red Army were due to be up by August 1941 and suggests that Stalin was going to make a move before those enlistments expired. He also states that the reason the Germans were initially so successful against the Red Army was because the Soviets were poised in an offensive posture rather than defensive posture at the beginning. I'm not saying that Suvorov's conclusions should be taken as factual but they are interesting enough to at least re-examine what we were told and what we thought we knew about it.

  • @michaelot77

    @michaelot77

    8 жыл бұрын

    Maxim Tyo I will agree with you that Lenin wanted to spread communism through political revolution abroad and Stalin did not invest in that idea. Stalin, I believe said, communism at home first and communism one country at a time. Most believe Stalin was wanting to spread communism through the use of military force and that explains why he was building such a massive military. I will give the Soviet Union the credit it deserves. They alone, defeated Nazi Germany and bore the brunt of the second world war long before the west made any kind impact or contribution. Another misconception is how the U.S. through its might and arms defeated Germany with not much mention of the millions of Red Army soldiers who fell turning the tide against the Wehrmacht. By the time U.S. forces landed at Normandy, Hitler's war machine had already been bled white by the Soviet Union. If not for the sacrifices made by the Red Army, the U.S. and its allies would have never been able to land one boot on the shores of North Africa, Italy or France.

  • @Sergecalifornia
    @Sergecalifornia4 жыл бұрын

    The British started the war/

  • @swordsman3000
    @swordsman30006 жыл бұрын

    B.S. middle / high school propaganda film if you REALLY desire truth, it's out there, you just have to ask the simple questions, and follow the answers -Why did Germany pick the 'Swastika" ? -If Nazi means 'Socialist' ; then why are they always called 'Right Wing', when socialism is embraced by the Left ? -Japan is a tiny island 1000's of miles away from our mainland, what on earth could they have to gain by attacking us for 'no reason' ? -If you have massive amounts of evil in your heart towards a group of people in a time of economic crisis/war...do you provide them with theaters, soccer games, and 'camp currency' before shooting, gassing and turning them into lampshades ? If you went to a public school in the United States after 1945...YOU WERE LIED TO !!!!! Now...please don't let your ego win out, you have nothing to be ashamed of, we were ALL lied to by teachers our parents told us to trust and listen to

  • @jimwatts7489

    @jimwatts7489

    5 жыл бұрын

    MythSlasher, Germany's big mistake was they were recovering and surpassing all the nations on the earth WITHOUT the help of loans from the elitist bankers; that has been starting wars and loaning money to all the different sides for centuries. Other nations were beginning to think about throwing the elitist bankers out, so the elitist bankers set Germany up and began a propaganda campaign against them that would lead to destroying the German finical system and the others countries thoughts of kicking out the elitist bankers.

  • @drjerry5389

    @drjerry5389

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@anticheatersquad2322 Stalin was a psychopath. Hitler was no saint but not the Butcher he is described as. Wallstreet funded Germany through the Western Union bank.

  • @fredmaxwell9619

    @fredmaxwell9619

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@drjerry5389 They were both evil murdering psychopaths murdering millions.

  • @drjerry5389

    @drjerry5389

    5 жыл бұрын

    +@@fredmaxwell9619 Im trying to explain to "revisionists" that regardless if the Nazis killed 1 million Jews, Gypsies and political opponents or 11 like the official numbers says. Hitler was a lunatic. Im not interested in researching Hitler but the fact is that the MI5 who listened to the German radio traffick all through the war? Mi5 estimated the number of dead to 1 million in the camps? Im a Jewish born Israeli but my great grandpa belonged to the 150 000 Jews who fought in the German army against Russia. It feels surreal to watch old photos of him in a Wehrmacht uniform? Eventually he realized the madness of Nazi Germany and escaped to end up in Israel.

  • @cancerfour69er
    @cancerfour69er5 жыл бұрын

    BBC Documentary.. FFS. Its 2018 now,guess what, ask the losers what they had seen and witnessed.. Or go back to sleep..night night.. Zzz

  • @theseekerndestroyer
    @theseekerndestroyer7 жыл бұрын

    Lie lies lies lies lies.

  • @MrKUSZTI
    @MrKUSZTI7 жыл бұрын

    German 1 Sep 39 and Russian 17 Sep 39 Invaded Poland

  • @tomcrouchman
    @tomcrouchman4 жыл бұрын

    The fascists and socialists were and are left wing not right wing....nice try in rewriting history,

  • @robertmoore6149

    @robertmoore6149

    4 жыл бұрын

    Fascists are right wing, communists are left wing.