Just spent a month in Istanbul, and I'm here to say the cats aren't exactly feral and aren't even exactly strays. Most will let you pet them, and some will come sit in your lap. They are, basically, the well-fed collective outdoor pets of the citizens of Istanbul.

@OhTheDeliciousIrony

Ай бұрын

When on a 10-day holiday in Turkey with my family last December and I agree. The cats of Istanbul are similar to the community cats of Singapore.

@mmtalii

Ай бұрын

I lived in İstanbul for 4 years and have family members living there since 80s and you are %100 right. I want to add that I some cafes have their own cats they look after and some people(including my aunt) has their dedicated stash of cat food for those 'stray cats'.

@csmatthew

Ай бұрын

‘Public Cats’ is the term I’ve heard

@aynenhaklsnkesinlikle7363

Ай бұрын

😊😊9😅😊​@@OhTheDeliciousIrony

@dannyarcher6370

19 күн бұрын

I think I'm gonna have to move there.

“Ruled longest by the Romans, except for a brief period when it was sacked by the Romans”

@praevasc4299

Ай бұрын

As if no other country ever had a civil war...

@faustusliviuspraetextatus6773

Ай бұрын

@@praevasc4299 Sacked by the romans who were not legally roman

@q-tuber7034

Ай бұрын

@@praevasc4299 in this case not a civil war, but the sack and takeover of a Greek city by Germans.

@JonManProductions

Ай бұрын

@@q-tuber7034 who claimed to be the actual holy romans by suzerainty of the Pope in Rome lmao

@Mimi.1001

Ай бұрын

​@praevasc4299 To be fair, the Romans are kinda known for their civil wars, much like China to some extent or any large empire with glory to attain for that matter who didn't do much to prevent that from happening (like the Ottoman killing all brothers thing, even though they still had their fair share). With the Romans like every odd emperor had some pretenders rising up at the same time or elite units / minorities revolting, especially when the previous emperor/ruler didn't think much of succession.

Official renaming from Constantinople to Istanbul happened during the Turkish republic. During the Ottoman era it was always officially Constantinople.

@7poppiesist

Ай бұрын

Konstantiniyye

@DonJuan911

Ай бұрын

​@@7poppiesistthat's the official name of the city in ottoman turkish/Arabic but the English name is Constantinople just like Beijing is called Peking in German. Different languages have different names.

@praevasc4299

Ай бұрын

The Turks seem to have an issue with the names of their country and cities being translated to other languages. They insisted everyone calls Constantinople Istanbul, and recently they even demanded that the name of their country shall not be translated to other languages, but to use "Türkiye" instead. Which is quite a big double standard, for example they call Germany as "Almanya" instead of "Deutschland". So it's quite absurd they demand their country's name not to be translated, while they do translate the names of other countries.

@Dr.Happy11

Ай бұрын

​@@praevasc4299it's not that absurd on their behalf, just simply SDE.

@benjiskyler7836

Ай бұрын

I'm not told New York was once New Amsterdam. Why they changed it, I can't say. They just liked it better way.

The Persian reign in Constantinople compared to the whole history of the city was like a second in a minute.

@tylerellis9097

Ай бұрын

@@IStevenSeagal The city has never been under Arab control.

@IStevenSeagal

Ай бұрын

@@tylerellis9097 No you're right. It was only Turkey/Anatolia/Rom that they took, but they couldn't go past to the bosphorus.

@mlgdigimon

Ай бұрын

the arabs controlled the land past the bhosphorus and even had farms durring there seiges@@IStevenSeagal

@IStevenSeagal

Ай бұрын

@@mlgdigimon Really. I guess I was half right.

@cristosl

Ай бұрын

There was never a "Persian" reign in Constantinople

The right answer is the Roman Empire.

@user-uf5nv5cb3b

Ай бұрын

It always is.

@Kolious_Thrace

Ай бұрын

Byzantion wasn’t Roman… It began Roman but very quickly things turned into Hellenic! Language, traditions, religion, the people… we had nothing to do with the Romans!

@IamSome1

Ай бұрын

​@@Kolious_Thraceit was the Roman empire till the very end, Greek was a lingua franca in the east since the Full Roman empire, not to say what you are writing about is wrong, but it's wrong factually.

@colombianmonarchist

Ай бұрын

​@@Kolious_Thracethe romans itself dont define the state like that

@Kolious_Thrace

Ай бұрын

@@IamSome1 so, Hellas never existed? Just because Rome conquered us that doesn’t mean that we vanished from the world! For a looong time we were part of their empire, we were NOT romans! We were Roman citizens! As well as French, Germans, Egyptians… all of these ethnicities we were Roman citizens, we lived under their influence. Byzantion was not Rome! Most of our emperors were Hellenes not Romans… latin was quickly abandoned and the language of our people🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷 used through the whole Byzantine empire. A common mistake thy many non natives do is that: “You called yourselves Romans” Actually no! There are two different terms but in your ears sound the same: Ρωμαίος > Roméos Ρωμιός > Romiós Romèos was the Roman Latin citizen Romiós was the Hellene Orthodox citizen! We were Romii not Romans! A term adopted becaus me for many years our name Hellas was equivalent of the old pagan religion. So, it was forbidden to use it as from that point we were Orthodox Christians. Romios: Hellene in the origin without telling the term Hellas, and Orthodox. While Romèos meant Roman! Latin in origin and pagan worshipper of the West before they also adopted Christianity.

"Byzantine Empire" is only an academic term. In reality it was still the Roman Empire.

@Ciech_mate

Ай бұрын

I like that, it puts a lot of internal conflicts in my head to rest.

@eugenegenoff3669

Ай бұрын

ORIGINALLY known as: the Mighty Republic

@Kolious_Thrace

Ай бұрын

Byzantion began as Roman but things turned around very quickly! We were not Romans! Language, traditions, religion, the people… noting to do with Rome! Byzantion was Hellenic and Orthodox🇬🇷☦️

@Agripapost

Ай бұрын

@@Kolious_Thrace ethnic identities can be abandoned and reclaimed. your ancestors abandoned greek ethnicity because it was synonymous, at the time, with greek religion. greek became an extinct ethnic identity exactly as roman is now.

@NikeonaBike

Ай бұрын

@@Kolious_Thrace if they werent roman why did they call themselves Ῥωμαῖοι ?

26:35 that song can't get out of my HEAD!!

@bblunder

Ай бұрын

Didn't realize it until now hahaha

@spencereades

Ай бұрын

Why did Constantinople get the works... 36 times?

@socialcontracttheory

Ай бұрын

came here looking for the other TMBG fans. i am glad im leaving without feeling disappointed

@tarafahomsy

Ай бұрын

Even old New York was once New Amsterdam 😊

@revinhatol

Ай бұрын

Turkish delight, anyone?

I think a Cairo video on the same mold would be fun!

@MohamedAli20244

Ай бұрын

I'm sure you mean Alexandria because cairo was built and controlled by muslims only the British and the French managed to control and rule it for some time

@davidroddini1512

Ай бұрын

A video about Cairo mold? That would be different for sure.

@juanfervalencia

Ай бұрын

or Alsasce-Lorraine

@Screwycummings

Ай бұрын

@@juanfervalencia I'm thinking the same thing. It'll be interesting to see whether it's more French or German.

@stevenemil9052

Ай бұрын

The geographical area of greater cairo dates back to pharohes, it was called Heliopolis or Iunu so a video about it would be great I think and span a very long period of time.

Fun fact in the 1990/2000's my school's Atlas still listed the city as "Constantinople (locally known as Istanbul)"

@Dr.Happy11

Ай бұрын

true OGs 💪🗿

@omerunlusoy

Ай бұрын

so it still hurts

@siyacer

Ай бұрын

lol

@kylezdancewicz7346

27 күн бұрын

What country are you in?

@kylezdancewicz7346

27 күн бұрын

You know the largest city in the USA is new Amsterdam (locally known as New York.

My favorite name for Istanbul is its Old Norse name: Miklagarðr. Mikla- being a cognate of Mega- and Much, and -garðr being the same root as Asgard and Midgard (often used for cities, Kyiv also has an Old Norse name, Kænugarðr). Basically, the Vikings called it a Megacity long before it was cool

@ophirbactrius8285

Ай бұрын

Aha its also known as "Tsargrad" by the Kievan-Russ fellas. 😃😃

@concept5631

Ай бұрын

Damn

@forzaacmilan36

23 күн бұрын

Bruh I just learned that from Vinland saga

@nurettinsarul

16 күн бұрын

Only the Turks can name their own city and they have done anyway. İSTANBUL

@stsk1061

5 күн бұрын

​@@nurettinsarulTake care of your inflation, first of all.

The real controller of Istanbul is the cats.

@Goldenskies__

13 күн бұрын

That's cute. I can support the CAToman Empire. Sultan Kedi has no enemies, everybody loves him 😉❤

@filipefernandes870

8 күн бұрын

The cats are the Roman spirits who still walk in their city.

Imagine thinking getting rid of icones rather than military reform is what you need when losing in many wars.

I think it's important to mention the "Catalan Vengeance" (1305-1307). The mercenaries from the Catalan Company were managing to turn the tide on the war against the Ottomans in Anatolia, but their commander, Roger de Flor, was assassinated in a banquet by the son of the Byzantine emperor. This resulted in a revolt of the mercenary company which sacked and burnt most cities in the Byzantine Empire and actually conquered modern day Greece. The destruction was such that until 2015, Catalan citizens were forbidden to go to Mount Athos. Byzantium was done for after all this betrayal and destruction, and lost Anatolia shortly after.

@concept5631

Ай бұрын

Assassinating a key political figure at the worst possible moment. They truly were Romans to the end.

@isuckatleague745

24 күн бұрын

Sounds like byzantine betrayed catalans :D why kill their commander and accuse them of betrayal. Fuck around and find out angle

@phosphorusgold2391

23 күн бұрын

@@isuckatleague745 They were indeed betrayed, but it is understandable from their perspective: The Catalans were a bit rape-y and sacking all the cities they conquered, the Byzantines were starting to owe them tons of money and Roger the Flor was getting stronger by the day (both in political, monetary and military aspects). So the assassination was a plan to save Bysantine power, as they thought the Catalan mercenaries would disband after it. But they miscalculated.

@its_dey_mate

20 күн бұрын

The fall of the Balkans can largely be attributed to the incompetency of the Byzantines at that particular period in time, but hey, that's history.

@imperator7828

18 күн бұрын

@@isuckatleague745 why dont you present the opposite perspective? Why did the byzantines do it ? GO ON

I went to Istanbul almost a year ago, Hearing all that history made it even cooler.

Thank you for the video and information

I like the history of cities videos. You should keep making them. Maybe not in the who controlled the longest format. Cities like Tokyo, Cairo or Mexico city would be fun.

@mrXOwarrior

Ай бұрын

I feel they have an agenda to talk about how great Islamic rule has been for great cities of Constantinople and Jerusalem, and that other leadership of other religions or societies are incompetent rulers.

tysm for the song references at ~26:30 🤧

1919-1922 Istanbul was controlled by UK, and in 1878 it was almost taken by Russian Empire

@Greek_guy20

25 күн бұрын

yeah you re right

@sadooww

23 күн бұрын

It was a occupied zone and it was a international zone. It was occupied, not conquered. The Turks won the war and the UK gave it back

@dimitrosskrippka2154

23 күн бұрын

@@sadooww doesn’t it mean it was controlled?

@cemdursun

23 күн бұрын

@@dimitrosskrippka2154 Yes and no. Officially it was still the Ottoman government in control but as a puppet of the British :)

This was great... i always wondered about that. Would be great to see something similar about Sicily or the south of Italy.

0:06 Two years ago?! Time passes so quickly!

Under whose reign did the city become cat central?

@UsefulCharts

Ай бұрын

I answer that as well.

@mmtalii

Ай бұрын

OMG too many cats for no reason how cute=Turks.

@efeaydnl57

2 күн бұрын

turks , from our papers while plauges happens in 1600s sultan took many cats from anatolia for pests and rats and it works

9:40 this is how the hymn "Ti Ypermacho" was created, it is a hymn to the Virgin Mary, who is referred to as the "Supreme Commander"

Amazing video!!!

Hmmm, I wonder why the choice was made to not include two sieges? Leo Tornikios's seige in 1047 is included as well as Andronikos IV Palaiologos's in 1376 but not Theodosius III/the Opsician Theme's in 715. And the first Latin seige in 1203 before the famous one in 1204. Also, some of the comments on the video are a mess. It's crazy how political some people find the city even all these centuries later.

Good content

Will you do another dna test comp video? You should check out adntro

There are a few reasons why people might sometimes confuse the Western and Eastern Roman Empires: 1. Shared Name: Both empires called themselves the Roman Empire, even after the split in 395 AD. This can be especially confusing since most historical references simply use "Roman Empire" without specifying Western or Eastern. 2. Geographical Continuity: The Eastern Roman Empire, also known as the Byzantine Empire, was a direct continuation of the Eastern Roman administration. The capital, Constantinople, had been a major city in the Roman Empire for centuries. 3. Cultural Legacy: Both empires shared Roman law, administration, and cultural traditions. Here's a breakdown of the key differences: Western Roman Empire: Fell in 476 AD after barbarian invasions. Centered around Rome in Italy. Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire): Lasted for over a thousand years until 1453. Centered around Constantinople (present-day Istanbul, Turkey) So Greek era is 679 + 977 = 1656 years...

Thats a banger right there

@1:00 Not to forget "City of World's desire"

A magnificent city that I would sure like to visit someday? The history and location are so important to the development of both East and West. Thx. 👍

I think because you are not familiar with the Arabic language, I think that the word “Fatih" and " conqueror” are not in the same meaning. Faith does not mean the word “occupation” at all. Faith is coming from verb open. There is a difference between the word “Fatih” and the word “occupation” and the word “Fatih” means that the city was besieged for a long period of time and then this army conquered it. You must correct the terminology that you use before presenting it. "الفاتح".: Fatih"

@XY-uc1tw

12 күн бұрын

Turks mostly do not speak Arabic. They use word Fatih as "conqueror”. In Arabic it could have different meaning.

Constantinople belongs to the Republic of Madagascar🇲🇬!!!

@jadobied1065

Ай бұрын

Real

@danielkarsten2816

Ай бұрын

I need more evidence

@davidroddini1512

Ай бұрын

Madagascar? Why Madagascar?

@CarlosAdrianAguirre-hp9fv

Ай бұрын

Finally someone talking some sense.

@ShonMardani

Ай бұрын

Constantinople is actually Constanti-noble and is a Farsi word "کسانی که نوآورند - kesani-ke-no-avarand" which means "Those who are innovative/Those who bring new things".

26:35 that was gold

@FARIS_482

21 күн бұрын

True my bro

@19.vishveshgupta32

10 күн бұрын

what is that??

@FARIS_482

10 күн бұрын

@@19.vishveshgupta32 , the great rise of islam

I was wondering if you could make a family tree of the real peaky blinders gang. Or any crime family that was operating during the prohibition. Love your videos

This video is a masterpiece

He said the thing! :D

Now you should do it with rome !

@TheRatOnFire_

Ай бұрын

Controlled by Rome. Then the Papal States. Then Italy. Done.

@pas-giaw6055

Ай бұрын

Not as interesting

@joshuataylor3550

Ай бұрын

Do it with your mum

@tylerellis9097

Ай бұрын

@@TheRatOnFire_ Nah you forgot Odoacer and the Ostrogoths, multiple HRE Emperors also directly ruled from there like Otto III.

@GrigRP

Ай бұрын

@@joshuataylor3550 Chav

Actually it was the Thracians, who arrived to the region more than 4000 years ago, founded the settlement, and other settlements around. The earliest name known for the town is Lygos. And according to linguists, King Byzas is also a Thracian name. Greek myths are known for appropriating others’ histories, and this seems to be one of those cases. So we can assume the city was mostly inhabited by Thracians all through the Thracian era, until they were devoured by Roman Christianity. But we may count it entering the Hellenistic influence at least by the Macedon rule. On the other hand, you may also divide the Roman era into two, considering the first part was being ruled from Rome, and then the Eastern Rome was ruled by the Anatolians and Thracians (not Greeks). That’s why what we call the “Byzantine architecture” is almost the same as ancient Thracian architecture. So we can say there was the long ancient Thracian era, a short Hellen rule, Roman rule, and a long native Anatolian sovereignty era. Then, Ottoman.

It'd be nice if Matt did an expanded version of the Ethiopian Royalty Family Tree (Zagwe + Solomonic) and went over the history more extensively.

Very fun video, even if the premise was more of an excuse that quickly faded into the background haha.

I'd suggest Cairo as the next city to look at :)

bro we literally only changed our regime, nothing else, we are still the same people as the ottomans

I really appreciate this channel!

J’ai été voir les poster ils sont superbes ! Et merci pour toutes ces vidéos… (Tu ne peux pas mettre une voix française STP…)

I love History!

Ρωμαίους 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷☦️☦️☦️

Can you do the same for any chinese , latin american or indian cities and add some graphs abd some cool graphics too

More than two thousand years of Greco-Roman civilization. The Queen of the Cities is an integral part of the identity of the Greeks and a holy city for Christianity. History can not be erased.

You should do Thomas Jefferson family tree.

I've been watching a lot of this channel's videos recently, and around 6 episodes in, I realized that in these videos you do not state any of your sources, which made me question the reliability of these videos. I'd encourage you to state your sources in the description or somewhere to ensure that your videos are reliable.

@VoidLantadd

Ай бұрын

Read "The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium" by Anthony Kaldellis if you want an up to date account of everything they mentioned from Constantine refounding the city to Mehmed's Conquest of it. Having read extensively on Roman history, the video was largely accurate, though skipped over a lot of history for the sake of the length of the video.

@Freefs1

Ай бұрын

@@VoidLantadd I get it, but it's not the viewer's job to do the research and verify the facts, these should be presented by the creator instead.

One of my favourite parts of UsefulCharts' videos is hearing "Hii this is Matt Bakerrr". But I smiled as if meeting an old friend when I heard the voice of Syawish. Thank you brother !

Thanks

What? Useful Charts without the voice of Matt Baker? What's going on here?

@davidhunt6508

Ай бұрын

It's not the first time. He occasionally has others narrate videos, I think ones they created, or are particularly passionate about.

@JustinLe

Ай бұрын

you must be new to the channel 😂 there have been guest hosts for years

@lucinae8510

Ай бұрын

That's Syawish from Al Muqaddimah, he's pretty much done all the videos relating to Islamic history because of his familiarity and better pronunciations. He's also done a few other videos recently due to Matt being sick or busy!

@revinhatol

Ай бұрын

Remember Jack Rackam?

Freakin' GREAT call back to Bette Midler's 'Istanbul (not Constantinople)' . . . I nearly fell off my chair laughing) many, many thumbs up . . . .

@xaviotesharris891

Ай бұрын

Love the song and Bette though I do, she only covered that song. The Four Lads first recorded it in 1953, I think in a nod to the 400th anniversary of the fall on Constantinople.

@oldemanA

Ай бұрын

@@xaviotesharris891 -thanks for pointing this out...just found The Four Lads version . . . . too funny

@lp-xl9ld

Ай бұрын

But of course, most people know the song today owing to the 1990 version by They Might Be Giants

@xaviotesharris891

Ай бұрын

@@lp-xl9ld Right. When that came out, I was unaware of Bette's brief stab at it on stage some years earlier - I thought TMBG had written it. When I saw her earlier version, I looked into it and learned about The Four Lads. And of course, TMBG had the benefit of Animaniacs.

Wikipedia states constantinople was beseiged 36 times, 19 more than Aleppo which had a surprising 17.

I advised you to make a history video on a city in Kuwait

''The city of world's desire''

It was still called Constantinople during Ottoman Times it wasnt renamed to Istanbul officially until Mustafa Kemal Attaturk came to power.

@DobyTheElf

Ай бұрын

Konstantiniyye

@omerunlusoy

Ай бұрын

Atam beee, bir kere daha gururlandım!

@captainvanisher988

19 күн бұрын

@@DobyTheElf that's just a translation of Constantinople in Turkish. Same way Germans call Beijing Peking.

The Turks have changed the name from Konstantinoupoli(s) to "Istanbul" because: The Greeks used (and still do) refer to a big city (any big city that is an economical and cultural center of your region) as "Poli" (City). Its an honorary title so to say. The greeks back then and still today say "lets go to the city" instead of "lets go to Athens" (or any other city that is the "powerhouse" in your region. In Greek that sounds: Pame is tin poli (lets go to the city) : pame "IS-TIN-POLI". The "ISTINPOLI" became "Istanbul" since the turks is all they could figure listening the population refering to the city of Konstantinople (the biggest powerhouse in all aspects, with the history, glory, ect...)

27:12 Ottoman's didn't pick the wrong side in WW1 because they had only 1 choice. They needed an ally against growing Russian danger on their borders and French and British didn't support Ottomans joining to the allies.

Very informative video! Thanks! However, although I guess I can calculate it myself, it may have been better to have separated the Byzantine Empire from the Roman Empire, since the former was pagan and Latin and the latter was Christian and Greek. So although the Byzantines may have called themselves Romans, the actual society was very different. In contrast, you could say that the Ottomans still rule Constantinople to this day, as besides losing non-Turkish territories and changing their government, it's the same cultural lineage that still exists there. So rather than "Greek", "Roman (but mostly Greek later on), and "Ottoman", it may be better to understand the eras as "Greek Pagan", "Roman Pagan", "Greek Christian", and "Turkish Muslim".

@JustinLe

Ай бұрын

if it was me I would have counted it by unbroken succession of rulers. So to me the Roman rule should have ended at the 13h century.

@muslimresponse103

Ай бұрын

@@JustinLethe last video about Jerusalem was divided by religious population; jewish, christian and Muslim. thats what everyone wants to see. we all know that the eastern roman empire or byzantine empire ruled over this city the longest.

@mariapapa6370

Ай бұрын

Your logic isn't quite correct the Turks today don't call themselves ottoman while the Byzantines definitely called themselves Romans well after the siege of the city. Also sure the religion changed but their every day lifes and their customs not so much.

@muslimresponse103

Ай бұрын

@@JustinLe if you count by dynasty or as you said unbroken succession of rulers then the ottomans would be the longest im pretty sure of that. the ottomans empire is one whole dynasty, whereas the roman empire had many different dynasties.

@muslimresponse103

Ай бұрын

@@mariapapa6370 the turks are ottomans and the ottomans were turks. your logic does not make sense!

Hey I’m going to the City, you guys want anything?

Yes

love the blurb about the cats at the end.

@ophirbactrius8285

Ай бұрын

Finally AWC are chucking deeply at the corner after knowing her lovely city are mentioned.

Now do Rome. I don't think it would beat Jerusalem or Constantinople for most of anything, but it would be interesting.

Byzation, constantinople and now Istanbul. Three names for one city

@ophirbactrius8285

Ай бұрын

Always forever Constantinople@Qunstantiniyyah 💖💖💖💖💖💖💖

@jackholler3572

Ай бұрын

​@@ophirbactrius8285 Uhmmm not sure about that 😂😂

@monsieur558

22 күн бұрын

They change the name, which is better than changing a gender 💀

Ottomans mostly called the city as: Dersaadet: Gate of Happiness Payitaht: Pillar of the Throne / Capital Konstantinopolis / Konstantiniyye : City of Constantine Im not 100% sure but İstanbul must be derived from Constantinople, not Islam - Islambol. (Islambol could be derived from Istanbul as you mentined) Constantinople ---> In Turkish: Konstantiniyye or Konstantinopolis (city of Constantine) Konstantinopolis ---> kon-STAN-tino-POL-is ---> ISTANBUL... This makes sense imo.

I wouldn't make a big deal of this normally, but since this is "Useful Charts" the spelling is BYZANTINE, not BYZATINE. Hopefully the printed chart for sale has corrected this

For Greeks who keep calling the Eastern Roman Empire "Greek", ask yourself: are they Greek or are modern Greeks actually Roman? I myself am Greek, but I have to accept that modern Greece has been profoundly influenced by Rome and is arguably the most direct continuation of the Roman Empire-culturally speaking. That's not to say that we cannot or should not call ourselves Greek, but I think we should reclaim our Roman name as well. Why should we shun our Roman heritage? Rome was a great civilisation.

@user-jh9nx6tl1n

Ай бұрын

Greeks in Turkey still call themselves Roman.

@txikitofandango

Ай бұрын

The national term "Greek" was adopted in the 18th century by Greek-speaking Romans under Ottoman rule, right?

@rosskourtis9602

Ай бұрын

​@@txikitofandango It was adopted during the revolution, which started in 1821. There were many reasons for the revival of the term, one of which was that some of the leaders of the revolution were western-educated and, thus, misinformed about the Eastern Empire.

@Pagokeraunos

Ай бұрын

It's the same thing. Ethnicaly Greeks, politicaly Roman. We had been the Roman empire for so long it became integral part of our identity.

@captainvanisher988

19 күн бұрын

Greek 100%. Ethnically, culturally, religiously and linguistically Greek. More particularly Hellenic. Roman was only a civic name or otherwise called "official name". The DPRK calls themselves democratic, is it democratic though? As for Rome and Roman civilization, the truth is that Greek influence inside Rome was far stronger than any influence Rome had over the Greek provinces. Most Ceasars spoke Greek in private during the united republic of Rome. So in a sense it would be more accurate to call the Roman empire, Greek than to call the Eastern Roman empire Italian. The modern successor of the Eastern Roman Empire is Greece, no matter how much people seethe.

There is a difference between the initial Roman empire that conquered Byzantium and the Hellenised capital of the East Roman empire. I think those should be differentiated. The initial Roman conquest of the city more closely resembled the Latin period of 1204.

The cats are my favourite fact about Istanbul!

I would love a third in this series with Belgrade!

Yea that arabic writing in the Hagija Sofija would not have been there when Justinian saw it. 9:10

@davidwright7193

Ай бұрын

There would have been a mosaic of Christ on a gold background there. Assuming that other Orthodox Church domes are modelled on it,

@UsefulCharts

Ай бұрын

Unfortunately, no one was smart enough to take a photo of the time Justinian entered it.

@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714

Ай бұрын

@@UsefulCharts A shame really.

@omerunlusoy

Ай бұрын

Well, it is there now, get over it

@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714

Ай бұрын

@@omerunlusoy I am a man who isnt particularly bothered by things he cant change. Fear if I ever get godlike powers tho, then the turks will be driven from Thace.

Another city that can come near to Constantinople in terms of being besieged is Delhi. The only problem is there's not much written history about Delhi before 1500 years. The admin can actually throw some light on it.

@DobyTheElf

Ай бұрын

Really? Attacked by Ghaznavis ?

@20:00 Byzantine is mispelled as Byzatine and it also is earlier

Μacedonia was Greece mate... Its was a Hellenic kingdom with Hellenic Doric people.. Moreover there were not Greece with contemporary's term it was city states with hellenic people...

@haksrax39

22 күн бұрын

He did count macedonian as greek?

@kknoesis

21 күн бұрын

@@haksrax39 At 2:09 says Anatolia, Macedonia and Greece. There were not political entity of Greece.. it was Greek States and greek Macedonian kingdom

Please do a family tree on the Venad Royal house

Constantine looks like Mark Zuckerberg

@stevetournay6103

Ай бұрын

Well he said Byzantium was founded by that Amazon guy, so why not...😁

@AbuTate69

Ай бұрын

Maybe it’s his 500x greatest grandad

My order of the Timeline of the Bible book just got delayed to June-October 2024. What happened?

26:41 I got that reference!

So the city belongs to the cats after all ❤

@omerunlusoy

Ай бұрын

I live in İstanbul but I cannot deny

The Byzantine Empire was Roman by status, culturally it was Greek so ~800 years of that can be shared by the two categories, if not straight up counted as Greek.

@LibertyMonk

Ай бұрын

Anyone who took Byzantium and stuck their capital there is doing so to become culturally Byzantine for the legitimacy. They even renamed the thing "The City", which is the kind of thing you do when it's important to your legitimacy.

@tylerellis9097

Ай бұрын

Well it is based on Political control not cultural and at no point did the Byzantine Empire stop considering itself the Roman Empire. It remained a Greek City as Byzantium even under Roman control so yeah if the criteria was changed Greek would be the undisputed number 1.

@DCCrisisclips

Ай бұрын

@@tylerellis9097 Yes why don't these people get that Roman and Greek is one and the same and that roman control was not seen as a occupation.

@zuraorokamono204

Ай бұрын

@@DCCrisisclips it wasn't always like that, the first few centuries the Romans were seen as foreign rulers, the Latins had to conquer the area after all, the Greek adoption of the Roman identity was a gradual process it cannot be helped that the Greek dominated medieval Byzantine/Rhomaioi Empire be distinguished from the classical Latin dominated Eastern Roman Empire culture wise even if they have a political continuum

@zuraorokamono204

Ай бұрын

@@tylerellis9097 they never stoped considering themselves the Roman Empire but the ruling elite stopped having cultural ties with Rome it wasn't a Greek city controlled by Romans, it was a Greek city controlled by Greeks calling themselves Romans I do not aim to devalue their legitimacy at all, I'm just saying the distinction must be made

Why didn’t you include the 5-year entente occupation in WW1?

who controlled (Egypt-Syria-India) the most? this an ideas fo the next video

27:56 The true ruler of Istanbul

@KorhanErel

Ай бұрын

I was fortunate to meet Gli at the end of 2011. She was one of the sweetest cats I have ever encountered. She was the true empress, but without the political intrigue and the powerplay. She just wanted to hang out and sleep on your lap. On colder days, she'd also put her face against the light projectors, becoming a truly holy being of light. She met almost all politicians, state and religious leaders who visited Haghia Sophia during her lifetime.

@emilgilels

Ай бұрын

The true ruler of Catstantinople. 😹😺

@KorhanErel

Ай бұрын

@@emilgilels ❤️🐱

@albertorimoldi8713

Ай бұрын

I met Gli in the summer of 2017. Really a wonderful and lovely cat.

The expression originated in the mid-15th century, shortly after the capture of Constantinople (ancient Byzantium and present-day Istanbul) by the troops of Sultan Mehmet II in 1453. Examples "I have two, sir, who, without vanity, could be presented to the pope, especially my eldest, who is a pretty bit of a girl. I am raising her to be a countess, although her mother does not want it. How old is she, sir, this future countess? But she is approaching fifteen years old: already that is a fathom taller for you, nice, fresh as an April morning, agile, uncoupled, sprightly, and above all strong as a Turk. Devil! these are good dispositions for being a countess. Oh! her mother may say so, she will be. >> Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra - Don Quixote of La Mancha

boy when they called it "the city of world's desire" they weren't fucking kidding huh

Actually Greek and Roman era is one and the same. Maybe you can count a couple of centuries as Roman in that region as administrative separation , but it's Greek era with different names.

if you are going to count the byzantine christian greek speaking empire and the eastern roman pagan latin speaking empire as one empire than so should the ottoman empire and the Turkish republic state be considered as one. also because in the Jerusalem video the city was under roman or british rule but because the people were jews it was considered as jewish. a religious version would have been interesting too! wether christians, greek/roman pagans or Muslims controlled it the longest? like the Jerusalem video.

@Carpediem357

Ай бұрын

Ottomans and turks are 2 very different groups compared to the long running Eastern Roman Empire

@muslimresponse103

Ай бұрын

@@Carpediem357the ottomans were predominantly a turkish empire who integrated and assimilated other minorities from their empire and borders into their elite. the latin romans also did the same with germanic and other peoples. the big difference is that the eastern roman empire was predominantly greek whereas the western romans were latin. the turkish republic today is predominantly turkish even though they have a large variety of ancestry today and many minorities like Kurds and others. the roman empire also changed its political system many times from “democratic” republic to dictatorship/empire to christian theocracy, etc. so it only makes sense that todays turkish republic is put together with the ottomans. because they just changed the political system like how the romans did.

@Carpediem357

Ай бұрын

@@muslimresponse103 Turkey and the Ottomans are 2 different groups. The Romans were never democratic. Republic and Democracy were 2 very different things in the ancient times. The Romans spoke Latin, even the East for a while spoke Latin before the predominant language changed to Greek, Latin was still used and spoken in the East. By the same logic you used: Ottomans were an empire then fell and Turkey became a republic thus making both entirely different entities so again Ottomans and Turkey are different groups and thus aren't grouped together

@muslimresponse103

Ай бұрын

@@Carpediem357 what nonsense are you on about. everything you are saying is wrong! the ottomans were turkish and the turkish republic are ottomans. their system of governance changed from tribal confederacy to absolute monarchy to constitutional monarchy, to a parliamentary dictatorship under Mustafa Kamal to a parliamentary democracy and now a presidential democracy/republic. but still the elite and majority of the population have always been Turkish from the first days of the ottoman empire till today. the turkish republic of today is a continuation of the ottomans. this is indisputable. so stop arguing about it. the real question is. was the byzantine empire really a roman empire or was it actually greek? it may have started as a latin roman empire with latin elites but soon it turned into a greek empire not just because its population was greek but also because its elite were greek and only roman in name! meaning they preferred to be known as roman because of its prestige giving them extra legitimacy as an empire but really they were as roman as the ottoman sultans were roman emperors. only in title/name! whereas the ottoman empire was always dominated by turks and the elite were mostly turks and the majority of its population was for the most part turks and its army and its generals etc. on the other hand the byzantine empire was mostly greek and not roman, more slavs and bulgars made up the byzantine army and elite than latin speaking "romans".

@Carpediem357

Ай бұрын

@@muslimresponse103 the Ottomans and the Turks are different groups. The Ottomans were a Imperial Monarchy whereas Turkey is a republic 2 different groups wow mind blown. The Eastern were Roman. No debate lmao. There is question, they called themselves roman, they spoke roman, they were part of the roman empire, they continued Roman tradition and practices. Ottomans and Turkey are different so again they should not be grouped together end of discussion. Capiseesh??

Saddest moment is history is the Hagia Sofia being converted to a Mosque

@Phonixrmf

Ай бұрын

I'm a Muslim and even I don't like that decision. Alas it's not the first house of worship that changed... ownership, and I don't think it would be the last

@emilgilels

Ай бұрын

Which time? ;-) Not sure it's correct to call it "the saddest" moment in history: history is alas full of them. The magnificent building is still there, persevering over the millennia through the caprices of human history.

@torilongstaff5591

Ай бұрын

Hey real quick question: how do you feel about the Great Mosque of Córdoba? real sad when that was converted into a cathedral huh?

@richardvillano4004

Ай бұрын

@@torilongstaff5591yes, but that was done 800 years ago. Hagia was converted just a few years ago and it wasn't even a Church anymore anyway so there was no reason for that other than to show some people reverted to a medieval mentality in the 21st century. Congratulations!

@nuclearpotato2000

Ай бұрын

​@@torilongstaff5591 The Muslims conquered Spain, built mosques, heavily taxed people of other religions, that's called colonization. Spain retook the peninsula during the reconquista and removed mosques. That's called decolonization. Turks conquered Greece and converted a great building into a mosque, replacing the native culture with your own is called colonization. Funny how colonizers always cry when decolonization happens to them, eh?

Who knew the Amazon guy had been around that long! 😁

Some education most people don’t know, Jerusalem was the Space Command Center and directed the space shuttles to the landing place in Baalbek. Even Mohammed claimed he rode his horse to heaven there.

@1_Fish.2_Fish.Red_Fish.

Ай бұрын

Did they have facilities for deuce dropping there?

When you speak of "fratricide", you can see the result for yourself in the Sultan Ahmet tomb. There you can see caskets of all the people killed, including those of small children.

@guycrew3973

Ай бұрын

It was such a simple solution to a problem all dynasties faced it’s insane no else tried it

The Allies also turned Constantinople into an international city for a year after WWI.

i think by this graph the greek control is the longest

So basically the Greeks, if you combine the ancient era and half of the Roman period where the empire was basically a Greek empire.

@VoidLantadd

Ай бұрын

It was not basically a Greek Empire. It was completely Roman. The Romans spoke Greek in the eastern provinces as they always had, but Greek was never how they identified themselves.

@richardvillano4004

Ай бұрын

@@VoidLantaddYou are correct but it's a bit more complicated than that. They did consider themselves Romans. They were the Roman Empire as we all know Byzantine Empire is a name historians gave them well after they ceased to exist. Yet they were aware they were Greek. But as you stated they considered themselves Roman. This was the case even before the western empire fell. They were the same but they were very different as well. That's probably why most think of the Roman Empire ending in the 5th century when it technically lasted almost another 1000 years. It's a shame.

@gilpaubelid3780

Ай бұрын

​@@VoidLantadd​ It was basically a Greek empire. Greeks with roman citizenship took under their control the Roman state during the medieval period and they controlled it for almost a millenia. The empire during the byzantine period had Greeks in charge, Greek elite, Greeks at its center, Greek as the lingua franca and Greek culture as the dominant culture. So even though medieval Greeks preserved the state and kept the Roman law and institutions it's not wrong to say that, in essence, the empire transformed into a Greek empire during the byzantine period. Medieval Greeks identified as both Greeks and Romans since that's what they were : Greeks and citizens of the Roman state (a state that they controlled during the medieval period). I'm not sure what gave you the impression that they didn't identify as Greeks. Plenty of sources from that period have survived and it's a fact that Byzantines identified as Greeks.

@VoidLantadd

Ай бұрын

@@gilpaubelid3780 It is not a fact that they identified as Greek. In those times Greek came to specifically mean someone from the Greek peninsula, so a Greek speaking Roman in Asia Minor for example would not have identified as Greek, while a Roman from Athens would have.

@gilpaubelid3780

Ай бұрын

@@VoidLantadd No, it didn't. And we have plenty of sources from Greeks from Asia minor that identified as Greeks. How do you explain this extract from George Tornikes for example? He refers to Byzantines as Greeks and distinguishes between barbarians and Hellenes (Greeks) , those who are "slaves by nature" ( τοις φύσει δούλοις) and those who are free (ελεύθεροι). He expresses his discontent that "barbarians" are used to fill up important posts in the byzantine empire during the reign of Manuel I Komnenos and says that he can't accept having the Greeks, who are disciples of the Muses and of Hermes coming second to those who speak a barbarous tongue, have barbarous mores and are servants of Ares. («Μη μοι τοις βαρβάροις τον Έλληνα μηδέ τοις φύσει δούλοις τον ελεύθερον συναπόγραφε ο φιλέλλην και φιλελεύθερος. Ου δέχομαι γλώσσαν μεν άλλους έχοντας βάρβαρον, ειπείν δε και γνώμην, και υπηρέτας Άρεος χρηματίζοντας ός επίπαν τοις βαρβάροις ωκείωται, ανά μέσον βαρβάρου διαστέλλειν και Έλληνος , τον δε γνώμην και γλώσσαν υπέρ Έλληνά τε πάντα και ήρωα, εραστήν τε Μουσών και Ερμού, των ανδρών εκείνων δεύτερον έρχεσθαι».) Another example:Joseph I Galesiotes (13th century) said that they were Greeks in race that call themselves Romans, a name that they took from New Rome/ Constantinople: Ἕλληνες ὄντες τῷ γένει, Ρωμαίους ἑαυτοὺς ὀνομάζομεν και αληθώς γε μην· εκ γαρ της Νέας Ρώμης η παρωνυμία αύτη προσκεκλήρωται ημίν Another example:The byzantine translators when they were translating the syriac text of Pseudo-methodius into Greek (8th century) they wrote as a clarification note : The empire of the Romans meaning that of the Hellenes/Greeks ( Εστί δε νυν η βασιλεία των Ρωμαίων ηγουν Ελλήνων) From the primary sources we can see that Byzantine Greeks (no matter where they were from) identified as Greeks during the entirety of the byzantine period.

2:10 Macedonia IS Greece. You cannot even get that right and you expect us to take your videos seriously ? I am out of here.

@bigchungus6320

17 күн бұрын

Yes but Macedonia is fundamentally different from the Greek city states, Greek city states saw Macedonians as cousins rather than the same

Hold on brother. You're talking about 330 CE and speaking about a pope. This is some semantics, but I think being quite accurate here is not too difficult. There was no 'pope' in 330 - because all bishops were popes at that time. The word originates from the Greek "Pappas" aka Father, which we still use to refer to all senior clergymen. The title that we use to represent the bishop of Rome wasn't used until 440 - by Pope Leo 1. Prior to the great schism (specifically, 1073), this reservation wasn't even official. Secondly, it wasn't proclaimed that the bishop of Constantinople would be second only to that of the bishop of Rome, but the inverse, it was proclaimed that the bishop of Rome was to be primus inter pares, and the bishop of Constantinople would come second, as decreed "The Bishop of Constantinople, however, shall have the prerogative of honour after the Bishop of Rome because Constantinople is New Rome" - this however didn't occur until 381, the first council of Constantinople. If we go a little deeper (which I wont) you begin to see the beginnings of the political plays that enshrine the Holy See as a power for centuries to come - incredibly interesting stuff.

It changed hands less times than Jerusalem even though it was besieged quite a bit more. I guess it helped that Constantinople was the capital of an empire, walled and was across a strait.

The Roman/Byzantine Empire of course 46 CE -1453 CE or 1,407 years under the names Byzantium and Constantinople. One of the biggest errors of the treaties ending the First World War was not evicting the Turks and giving the European part of the city and country to Greece.

@ipsiz1929

2 күн бұрын

You talk to the Turks as if you gave it with their own consent. The British knew that this would not happen without fighting. and the Greek army, which was now fighting on their behalf, had been destroyed in Anatolia. How the British would give it to Greece. How Greece, without an army, would hold the city. You don't know the conditions of the period. We Turks would never accept this. We would take the city even if we shed blood. In Russia, the communists were at the beginning and preferred the Turkish army in Anatolia to the Greeks. Because they were both fighting against imperialism. No wonder they prefer each other.