Which A320 Is Best For Beginners in MSFS?

Ойындар

Let's take a closer look at the differences between the FlyByWire A32NX, the Asobo/ini A320NEO, and the Fenix A320CEO
0:00 Intro
0:20 All The A320's
2:49 Textures Comparison
5:25 Systems & Depth of Simulation
7:08 Performance & FPS
7:59 Sounds
8:33 Installing, Updating & Stability
10:16 Recommendations
#msfs2020 #msfs #flightsimulator #microsoftflightsimulator

Пікірлер: 28

  • @dfenc
    @dfenc26 күн бұрын

    thank you merci pour l'info 👍

  • @JohnSeong
    @JohnSeong26 күн бұрын

    FBW because of its comprehensive docs. But Fenix wasn't too hard after all, they share many of the same procedures as FBW and iniBuilds after all; besides, with great addition of comprehensive VNAV functionalities it's definitely over the top

  • @matejmarosz20

    @matejmarosz20

    25 күн бұрын

    Recommending new players FBW to later transition to fenix is the best tip honesty. When i jumped to fenix i thought its gonna be a little difference in detail and realism, but its night and day.

  • @g_pazzini

    @g_pazzini

    25 күн бұрын

    too bad FBW doesn’t support RNAV approach.. might be a bummer. for now maybe inibuild is a go to airplane for beginner.. and it’s also free.

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    25 күн бұрын

    My thought process was that for a beginner to airliners an ILS approach is easier to understand if you’ve done them already in a GA plane, so the fbw is fine to start with since it is much more stable. After that, it’s worth to try the ini for the RNAV approach, since it’s an easy transition.

  • @matejmarosz20

    @matejmarosz20

    24 күн бұрын

    @@g_pazzini fbw supporting rnav is just a question of time, as the functionality should come into it when the a380 releases somewhat.

  • @I_Evo

    @I_Evo

    24 күн бұрын

    ​@@matejmarosz20Three plus years and counting! I suppose the same applies to independent MCDU's and a performance calculator in the EFB? And I know the usual counter to that always used to be "well it is free, what do you expect?" but given we've now got the INI version as part of the sim that line isn't the debate winner it used to be.

  • @peteallennh
    @peteallennh26 күн бұрын

    Great review and discussion as always, Marc. Question: how are you doing the internal walk-through of the plane? Is that using external camera? I still can't do proper external views. I tried the ini, but I found the default views to be really awkward. I'm just too accustomed to the FBW, I suppose. The RNAV/RNP may be a good enough reason in itself to work with it more, though.

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    26 күн бұрын

    Thanks Pete, I was using the drone cam to get a lot of the external shots. All my wing views are the interior cameras views 1-9 though. For those you should be able to just walk through the cabin door to get to wherever you want for it

  • @christinebouchard3691
    @christinebouchard369126 күн бұрын

    Excellent vidéo,thanks,nothing on the LVFR 320?

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    26 күн бұрын

    Merci Christine :) I considered including it, but I think you’ll be better off with any of the other 3, especially considering how much they ask for it. Even on Xbox, I don’t think it’s worth the asking price.

  • @Sh9168
    @Sh916825 күн бұрын

    FBW because it's FREE!!

  • @techwhipped
    @techwhipped24 күн бұрын

    My first choice is FBW. The reason behind this is that FBW saved the default A320 included with Microsoft Flight Simulator when it first launched. They went through many ups and downs, dealing with an incomplete SDK and even releasing their product on Xbox in the Marketplace at one point. My second choice would be Fenix because of its high level of detail in textures and its study-level accuracy. I find both the FBW and Fenix to be more stable than the inbuilds A320. During a test flight, I noticed the inbuilds A320 swayed left to right a lot when following the navigation.

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    24 күн бұрын

    That's pretty much how I feel as well :)

  • @whatzoup6440
    @whatzoup644025 күн бұрын

    Love the video. Hate the new youtube UI.

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    25 күн бұрын

    There’s a new UI?

  • @LePerlashez
    @LePerlashez25 күн бұрын

    I'll stick to the FBW because I am having a hard time landing the Inibuilds. Even if the approach is stabilised and smooth when I am at 30 feets above the rwy and start flaring the Inibuilds would start gliding over the rwy. I have never had this issue with the FBW.

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    25 күн бұрын

    The FBW hand flies the best of the two for sure.

  • @LePerlashez

    @LePerlashez

    25 күн бұрын

    @@FlightSimSchool this problem has been discussed on MSFS forums and reported to the Inibuilds dev team but they don't seem to care much about it.

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    25 күн бұрын

    @LePerlashez Yeah, I also understand it from their point of view: it’s way better than the default 320 was overall, so they consider the job is done.

  • @Xpnvh
    @Xpnvh12 күн бұрын

    fbw is prob the best, but if they made the inibuilds one be able to automatically have the flightplan from the default msfs flight plan globe thing maybe that 🤔

  • @Xpnvh

    @Xpnvh

    12 күн бұрын

    because i dont feel like planning out the flight i wanna do it instantly (im impatient)

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    12 күн бұрын

    I doubt they will implement that since it’s meant to be part of the experience to set it up from cold and dark, but hey you never know! I know a lot of people who would like that feature too.

  • @lukeskywalker3216
    @lukeskywalker321626 күн бұрын

    fenix

  • @brewpilot8728
    @brewpilot8728Ай бұрын

    Neo

  • @brewpilot8728
    @brewpilot8728Ай бұрын

    FBW

  • @FlightSimSchool

    @FlightSimSchool

    Ай бұрын

    Agreed :)

Келесі