Save 20% on your system and your first month is free when you sign up for Fast Protect Monitoring at simplisafe.com/task

@cesiumion

15 күн бұрын

How do you know it's a she and not a he?

@KittyCat-qg4vd

15 күн бұрын

OMG! The Chinese carrier Fujian has gone to sea for sea trial today! It takes China 5 years to build a carrier. US took 12 years to build Ford. And USS Ford is only partially working. OMG!!!!

@chadleschasin2893

15 күн бұрын

@@KittyCat-qg4vdOMG , the Ford Carrier is obsolete…. Only the superior Chinese knock off carriers are the true masters of the seas …. 😂😂😂 they can’t even get the catapults to work , and sea trails will probably last until it’s sunk by a US fighter during the up coming thrashing the PLA and PLANavy will receive at the hands of the US , Japanese , Taiwanese , Australian, British navies and Airforces 😂😂😂

@Pakistan_airforce

15 күн бұрын

​@@KittyCat-qg4vdnice but the rassian yeah that thing is sexy

@h8GW

15 күн бұрын

This video gave me an idea you might to cover: I always wondered how russia deals with customers of their military gear when they call back saying that their products aren't performing as advertised. EDIT: 15:51 Also, what the hell is a Tu-190? A plane _even_ more stealthy than the PAK-DA?

Military leaks that were not on the War Thunder forum, usually means there’s probably no plan to add said vehicle into the game.

@xxxlonewolf49

15 күн бұрын

Needs to be BUILT for WarThunder to add it. No WOT paper/made up tanks hahaha

@lunkystraydog6572

15 күн бұрын

Meh add it

@thespalek1

15 күн бұрын

😂😂that says a lot.

@chiguireespacialespecial

15 күн бұрын

I believe in Aurora!

@NineSeptims

15 күн бұрын

@@xxxlonewolf49 paper tanks exist in war thunder...

It obviously disappeared because it’s invisible and that good at stealth

@colonelarmfeldt8572

15 күн бұрын

Just like the Su-57 and the T-14 Armata, the world's first stealth tank.

@airthrowDBT

15 күн бұрын

Why dont you ever see Elephants hiding in trees? Because they're so good at it!

@beksultanisaev7426

15 күн бұрын

😅😅😅😅😅

@X35C

15 күн бұрын

Along with the uninterceptable Iscander.

@unoriginalname4321

15 күн бұрын

To be fair, balsa wood and paper is *very* difficult to detect with radar

Sometimes you just know when the comment section is going to be 80% of people saying the same joke.

@highdefinist9697

15 күн бұрын

Which joke? I haven't seen it.

@Omni0404

15 күн бұрын

@@highdefinist9697 That's a shame

@rizkyadiyanto7922

14 күн бұрын

​@@Omni0404the joke is stealthy.

@Mirul-ef3jb

6 күн бұрын

​@@rizkyadiyanto7922 as if us projects

@Flipdagoose

18 сағат бұрын

@@highdefinist9697 Thats because we're so good at stealth you never even noticed our humour

The Tu-160 doesn't get the credit it deserves - an intercontinental supersonic bomber that's bigger than a B52!

@racing_mntage1584

6 күн бұрын

Marvel of engineering

@davidelliott5843

3 күн бұрын

Tu-160 won’t go within 50 miles of Ukraine border. Hardly a sign of marvellous tech.

@cosmoray9750

2 күн бұрын

" Russian firms buy $4 billion worth of India-made arms, pay in Indian rupee "

@manichaean1888

Күн бұрын

​@@davidelliott5843If it performs its task from the distance of 50 miles what is the reason to enter the Ukrainian airspace?

@Tommy-zs6ro

Күн бұрын

​@@manichaean1888exactly, why risk it? To prove something to some geniuses on the KZread comments section 😂

Man, I can relate to Russia... So many plans, so little cash, all my own fault.

@ineffige

15 күн бұрын

Nah, wrong. If you were like Russia it would look like: "So many plans, so much cash, nothing works, it all fault of the rotten West!" while packing your pockets with stolen money.

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

15 күн бұрын

Then why yhey coming up with new weapons in ukraine?

@Mwwwwwwwwe

15 күн бұрын

🏆😂😂Except unlike russia, you have self-awareness.

@Mwwwwwwwwe

15 күн бұрын

​@alexnderrrthewoke4479 the blyat mobile is truly revolutionary

@Poopydingleberry

15 күн бұрын

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479when do you get your lunch break at the troll farm 🥱

What Happened to Russia's New Stealth Bomber? Russia: Yes.

@RazorsharpLT

15 күн бұрын

I mean - i think they should focus on making the SU-57's stealth better than an F/A-18 super hornets or hell - even PRODUCING the damn thing, but hey, that's just me

@ali-haider5788

15 күн бұрын

They are upgrading the tu160m rn Also their factories are focusing on su35 su34 ka52 cause they are the most useful in ukraine atm

@chiguireespacialespecial

15 күн бұрын

@@RazorsharpLT It was always Alice chasing the Skunk!

@Sepuku78

15 күн бұрын

The same thing that happened to US new corvettes and coast guard ships )

@FrankExchangeofViews.

15 күн бұрын

@@RazorsharpLT They should focus on getting out of Ukraine.

I heard this bomber is actually a Transformer in disguise: it transforms into a Russian general's newest Bentley.

@rodshoaf

7 күн бұрын

It will probably transform itself into a pile of rubble on it's test flights.

@zaco-km3su

7 күн бұрын

Before 2021 I would have said you're right. Now? Not anymore.

This engine air intake design would put the engine at higher risk of FOD due to the intake's area length and high suction pressure possibly sucking surrounding intake panels and screws if proper maintenance is not consistent.

So stealthy, it hasn't been spotted on the drawing board either

@thinkersanonymous9106

15 күн бұрын

Nice 😎

@apathyguy8338

15 күн бұрын

Russia is easily capable of Designing a stealth bomber with a radar signature only slightly bigger than the Pentagon. How dare you insult them!

@noncekilla8848

15 күн бұрын

Cope

@Castragroup

15 күн бұрын

Its literally being developed

@Castragroup

15 күн бұрын

@@apathyguy8338 and patriot still cant detect it 😅

Do they want another F15 situation? Because lying about specs is how you get another F15.

@Meowface.

15 күн бұрын

That’s probably exactly what they want America is going broke, their growth in national debt is unsustainable Growing by a trillion dollars approx every 100 days How long til that house of cards falls? Well you could accelerate it by baiting them into spending hundreds of billions on aircraft development to counter a threat that doesn’t even exist

@jeremyjackson8196

15 күн бұрын

The most gangster fighter of all time?

@mememem2m2m2

15 күн бұрын

​@@jeremyjackson8196they overhyped the foxbat, so we built the f-15 to counter that only to find out the foxbat was a lemon.

@x_chadboy2267

15 күн бұрын

Even worse another way to get an F22 situation.

@valkyriesride129

15 күн бұрын

It's already too late, they just haven't told us yet. 😂

The video editing is great in this one.

There is absolutely no way the B21 only has a range of 2500 miles. The B2 has a range of 6000 miles, The B52 has a range of 8800 miles, and the B1 has a range of 7500 miles. They are not replacing the B1 and B2 with a "long range bomber" that only has 1/3 of their range. A simple google search shows Popular Mechanics estimates that the B21 has a range of 6500 miles which is probably fairly accurate given the range of the other long range bombers currently in use by the USA. A range of 2500 miles would barely be enough to fly from New York to LA or from LA to Hawaii.

@nolongerblocked6210

15 күн бұрын

🎯🎯💯

@larrybelton5489

10 күн бұрын

I don’t know where this man gets his facts , 2500 mile range on the b21

@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell

9 күн бұрын

It's all over the internet. B-21 can fly without refueling 2,500 miles

@larrybelton5489

9 күн бұрын

@@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell I’m not a military expert, but the range is 6500 miles. The United States will not develop a plane that has less range. It makes no sense.

@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell

9 күн бұрын

@@larrybelton5489 the original source, I believe, was some sort of Australian purchase agreement so it may be the range of the export version of the bomer. Who knows

So you're telling me this thing is the size of a B-21 but carries twice as much load? How is that possible?

@HailAzathoth

15 күн бұрын

Soviet magic obviously

@Taskandpurpose

15 күн бұрын

actually they claim its the same weight at the b-2 bomber with a similar max take off weight of 112 tons and a payload still larger than the b-2 at 30 tons. but thats just one russian source its not like the Russian military is saying any of this. it looks likely this will never get built but who knows!

@indianajones4321

15 күн бұрын

The power of will

@sawney_bean

15 күн бұрын

Vodka and some madlad russians

@Right-Handed_Neutrino

15 күн бұрын

​@CubeInspector haha no they're not. The Soviets were good at rocket engines, but jet engines have always been shit. Chris is giving the Russians way too much credit. They lie everytime about their capabilities, including their jet engines. Remember the Foxbat? They claimed it could do Mach 3.2+ and claimed it was made mostly of titanium. But we eventually got our hands on one and figured out quickly that it was a heavy slow bird. First, it would yard sale itself if pushed much pass 90% throttle and it was made of nickel steel, not titanium. That's how we made the best fighter jet ever made; the F-15

55 seconds into the video: I've created my own stealth bomber, the "F U" bomber, which has a range of 10,000 miles, in service and operated by the UK military😤🇬🇧

@iloveaviation-burgerclub-a8145

15 күн бұрын

Yeah. I work at a hidden german site finl testing our stealth strategic bomber. Its figures are a bit old fashioned german but we are just the best engineers in the world. So what did you expect less than a small bomber weighing just 12,723 t with a payload of 73,321 t and an operational range of 232.227 nm at a service ceiling of 534.877 ft. I have seen it once before initial powerup. Since then it was never seen again and only the engineering crew has goggles to see all the work left. Delivery to the Luftwaffe starts hard scheduled on July 7th and it is planned to make it appear on July 14th over the US capitols to fade again.

@boejiden7093

15 күн бұрын

The only thing unbelievable about that is that the UK is operating something new.

@ivancho5854

15 күн бұрын

​@@boejiden7093 Brutal, but true. 🤣

@gisterme2981

15 күн бұрын

Hey, wiseguy, you forgot to mention that you design can carry 80 12,000 pound bombs or a dozen Czar Bombas...

@gikigill788

15 күн бұрын

Britannia rules the air 😂😂

You have the most informative and easy to understand vids on the web. Thank you

@avadhutagita3741

8 күн бұрын

propaganda is always easy to understand

@vvp_rus

Күн бұрын

This dude talks complete nonsense and often just lies. Don't you have critical thinking?

And now the experts to tell us how it will never be a reality or how supposedly it will be in low numbers. May I ask what happend to that 750 f22 jets and ended up with 190 or something. I mean the plan for the b21 which isnt even out yet is tohave 200 units produced but lets wait and see if that doesnt become something like 70.

@corneliusmcmuffin3256

10 күн бұрын

production of modern equipment is hard and takes time. The T-14 is 10 years old yet suffers the same problems your describing, its taken 2 years into Ukraine for Russian industry to kick into second gear and sustained their tank fleet in some limited capacity in this prolonged war. Take into account Tanks have a much lower bar to entry than a stealth fighter, so the fact that the US can produce 190 is impressive, even if it should probably be outputting closer to 750. Russia should be glad America is this inefficient, even now the American air force would wipe the floor, imagine if America gets into a modern war and we learn how to produce at peak efficiency like we did during world war 2?

@Silver_Prussian

9 күн бұрын

@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 ,,production of modern equipment is hard and takes time" Dang I wish most of you guys realised that when the Armata and su57 came out. Though I think you will get it when the russians start to laugh about the 10 pathers, 5 chally 3 and the 20 at best new gen abrams are all that western armies can muster. It has taken 2 years nope less than a year to start mass producing stuff and start going back to the soviet capabilities. Though if in an all out war, the russians can in a matter of months do that, build back the factories and machines, get the personal and soldier. You know why ? Because they are in full control of their MIC, the west isnt. In russia its a matter of national security, in the west its a business, thats that major difference The armat wss presented 10 years ago just like the germans presented their new panther which will come into existence in about 10 years from now IF everything goes smoothly, IF ! The armata finished its trials in late 2022, since then there have been rumors for its mass production but nothing concrete, the russians would probably hide the real numbers built for a reason. They posted 190 over the course of 15 years if the full plan for production was to be realised it would have taken more than 2 trillion dollars and up to 2030 yo 2040 to complete the 750 units. America would not be able to do anything because the only way for them to utilise most if their airforce is via the bases in europe and their carriers, since the cold war countermeasures for both have been created, from the high tech subs to the carrier killers to the tactical nukes carrier by supersonic missiles.

It is so stealthy , we never saw it in action

@chaselewis3819

15 күн бұрын

Yeah, probably never will either

@menzbercedes8962

15 күн бұрын

All PLL that say this don't even know what is bomber and how it's work and doesn't even know how fighter plane made

@shaunvduke

15 күн бұрын

​@menzbercedes8962 fortunately, without Ukranian engineers - Russia doesn't know how fighter planes are made either.

@arthurolesch5879

15 күн бұрын

Must be flying in space…

@mrwhips3623

15 күн бұрын

Duh...it hasn't been built yet🤡🤡 Are you dense?

So stealthy, we didn't even detect it leaving the designer's notebook.

@aniksamiurrahman6365

3 күн бұрын

Cope. How's the $61B doing on the battlefield? Oh, wait, it arrived so stealthily that it's not even detectable from the battle outcomes.

"Small Russian sity Kazan" deserves to be listed in the treasury of golden quotes

@apollobouncer

15 күн бұрын

This vid is littered with stupid mistakes, Kazan is only one of them. Talks about the TU-2 - shows model of Tu-22, What is this new Tu-190 aircraft? The model was the Tu-160 and plenty more elementary or just careless howlers. This guy has ZERO credibility - click bait crap

@nolongerblocked6210

15 күн бұрын

Tankie cope is the funniest cope

@highdefinist9697

15 күн бұрын

@@apollobouncer Конечно, конечно. Это просто опять "недружелюбная погода", верно?

@worldoftancraft

14 күн бұрын

@@nolongerblocked6210 guys who see tankie in everyone is even more funny. Pitiful.

@nolongerblocked6210

14 күн бұрын

@@worldoftancraft cry

I find it hard to believe the stated range estimates of Russian/Chinese equipment when it's said they lag behind in engine technology and are getting heavy "influence" from US made equivalent aircraft. When you put it into that perspective, the only way they're getting that range is if they're replacing the payload with extra fuel capacity and a magic carpet.

@nolga3569

12 күн бұрын

You will eat your words, the Russians are working with the Persians on the rug propulsion system. It will be on the war thunder forums soon.

@ramrod9556

12 күн бұрын

Russian military aircraft have excellent range. The SU-35 fighter escorted Putin all the way from Moscow to the UAE without re-fueling or drop tanks, something no western fighter could do.. The TU-160 has a range of over 7500 miles and the wings of the PAK-DA have room for some huge fuel tanks. It is foolish to let biases cloud reality.

@Slavic_Goblin

10 күн бұрын

Some of that "influence" is simply due to that design being optimal. Physics is the same regardless of the engineers nationality.

@X774M

8 күн бұрын

​@@ramrod9556well russian fighters are big and carry alot more fuel... But are also alot heavier

@X774M

8 күн бұрын

​@@ramrod9556also a few of western aircraft have longer ranges like f16, f15, Rafale but others are not far behind and why should they if Europe is smaller than russia distance wise

Kazan a small city with almost 1,500,000 people?

@kyleslater5245

15 күн бұрын

I suspect he’s being slightly sarcastic…

@python3215

14 күн бұрын

its small compared to moscow and st petersburg

@xuko6792

10 күн бұрын

small russian Great Tatar

Brilliant breakdown. Been looking forward to this episode. Thanks for making it, loads of great details that are hard to find elsewhere.

question. @1:42 grey plane in the second row, behind Tu-22m and Tu-22 what is it? feels like su-15

What a coincidence I was just researching this exact topic yesterday.

Hey have you thought about doing a video about what’s goin on between Philippines and China right now? Thanks for great content big fan!

@nvelsen1975

15 күн бұрын

Plenty of material on that. The Philipino dictators want all that sea to themselves for their broke country. (turns out remaining feudal in 2024 doesn't work, who knew?) So they illegally stranded a navy ship in Chinese territory, manned it and now claim to have a military base there and claim 200 miles in every direction as theirs. China doesn't like people threatening its lifeline trade and wouldn't mind finding some oil or gas so they don't 100% rely on imports, so they claim the maximum and some more besides. China also doesn't like Moscow's obedient servants in Ho Chi Minh city This could be taken care of in five minutes if they made a deal to never tax or threaten Chinese shipping and agree to sell whatever they find in the sea without blockade or boycot, but hey, dictators be dictators and if Duterte Junior goes against the feudal elite to fix the underlying issues, he'd 'accidentally fall out of a window' in mere days. So it'll continue for a while.

"Small russian city of Kazan" is 5th largest city in Russia, with population about 1.5 million.

@ReeksOfLies

15 күн бұрын

Yea no doubt. I quickly looked and some site said it was 8th with 1.2+M, but still. It's definitely not just some small city in Russia . Compared to other large cities around the world or say in the US, sure. - Obviously not even then. As stated below, it wouldn't even be small compared to average US cities.

@RazorsharpLT

15 күн бұрын

That's small by US standards. Or used to be small by Russian standards.

@wanderer10k

15 күн бұрын

@@RazorsharpLT It would be in the top 7 US cities.

@SirSayakaMikiThe3rd

15 күн бұрын

​@@wanderer10k A metropolitan area population of almost 2 million people is not particularly big. That's about the same as the Fresno metropolitan population.

@voidtempering8700

15 күн бұрын

​@@SirSayakaMikiThe3rd That doesn't change the fact that it is still a large city. And the Fresnoetropolitan area has a population of 1.171 million. Fresno City has a population of 542,107.

Have been hearing about this since last 2 decades.

The b2 spirit is a brilliant German design 😊

2500 miles for the B-21? More like 6-8000 miles.

@perryrush6563

15 күн бұрын

With in-flight refueling? Or are you saying without fueling? And yes, I realize theoretically (not technically) with in-flight refueling the distance is determined by other components other than fuel.

@perryrush6563

15 күн бұрын

I mean it's smaller than the B2.

@ryanthorne5432

15 күн бұрын

The B-21 is supposed to have greater range without refueling than the B-2.

@dogsbecute

15 күн бұрын

he mightve thought it was 6-8000 KM, and converted it to miles. Idk. im reaching, but the eye math checks out.

@Taskandpurpose

15 күн бұрын

that mistake slipped through the cracks I apologize for missing that. I try to double check all the numbers but sometimes I miss errors. honest mistake I thought it sounded weird as I was saying it. im a dummy : / I feel pretty bad about that slip up

With all these cool new planes in the last 10-20 years we REALLY need another Ace Combat game! Come on Namco

The 3D model that is described as Tu-160 (at 1:42 and 5:06) is in fact the one of an early Tu-22M (the later ones have inlets similar to F-15). Tu-160 has underwing air inlets.

@almazblanco6676

6 күн бұрын

Вы правы👍

I’m sure all 3 wooden models that will be built will look formidable on the ground to the superiors.

Tu-2 is not a thing. It was Tu-22. While saying Tu-160, it shows Tu-22m....

@yomama629

15 күн бұрын

He was referring to the WW2 era bomber Tu-2 "Bat". He just showed the wrong aircraft in the video while talking about it

@rocksteady5517

13 күн бұрын

@@yomama629 Both depicted aircrafts where wrong. Both were TU-22s.. He also said TU-23M xD

The Prospective Aviation Complex for Long-Range Aviation... brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.

@KomenJolokia-cd4np

15 күн бұрын

hey at least its modular

@smalltime0

14 күн бұрын

It isn't as stupid as it sounds. Russia has 3 branches of aviation: Long-Range, Front-Line and Naval. So the development program is ПАК (Prospective Aviation Complex) and the sub programmes are for each department. ДА is of course the Long-Range Aviation branch, ФА is Front-line Aviation (Su-57) and as far as I am aware there is no current Naval programme in progress because their aircraft carrier spends 95% of its time in dock anyway.

@djdrocco

14 күн бұрын

@@smalltime0 Cool, that explains why the name looks so goofy, though it does still look goofy.

@Shinkajo

3 күн бұрын

Oh man, the DoRD. I laughed out loud at that. Thanks.

Imo it is quite interesting to see differences between patent drawings and animation, there seem to be few changes making it more efficient subsonic aircraft with less compromised aerodynamics by stealth (winglets and intakes mainly).

Cost analysis, and lack of mature technologies keeps a lot military projects on the shelf.

Love your Content Bro, keep up the Grind. Stay Safe Good Sir.✌

What will arrive first? The production model or the yacht purchased by the oligarch who stole the R&D money? My money is on the yacht

@philosopher2king

15 күн бұрын

- "Where is money you spend on stealth bomber?" - "I thought you said spend money on 'Bomb Svetlana'."

@beibotanov

15 күн бұрын

extremely funny joke in light of 90k bushings bag

@zachhoefs9543

15 күн бұрын

@@beibotanov you should feel blessed, Rusky. Imagine what toys the US would have if the M.I.C. wasn't charging the government 90k for a bag of bushings.

@R3llyman

15 күн бұрын

@@zachhoefs9543 yea but that also apply to what russia would be like if they didnt have people spending all the money on yacht

@beibotanov

14 күн бұрын

@@zachhoefs9543 this post feels like a butthurt

Never underestimate what you will never see or feel.

You can solve the angle of attack air intake issue with louver on the front/bottom of the aircraft that open during high angle of attack maneuvers. This can be okay to do on stealth aircraft as them being at a high angle of attack disrupts their ground stealth profile anyway and those openings are no longer facing the ground anyway.

I mean, if we're all having trouble looking for the new stealth bomber...

@Odin31b

15 күн бұрын

I mean, i mean, I mean..

@jeffc1753

15 күн бұрын

Lol, delusional.

@philosopher2king

15 күн бұрын

Dude, it's so stealthy not even the Russians can find it.

@leeboy26

15 күн бұрын

IT'S STANDING BEHIND YOU RIGHT NOW

I love the design of the Plane, Looks so sleek

It's stealth capabilities are so good it's been hiding the T14 armeta tanks as well.

The flying wing design is not as much about the drag deduction as it is about payload to weight ratio. The high payload may be used to carry more weapons or more fuel.

Even if they could put this into production, it would no doubt follow in the footsteps of all the other Russian weapons systems that have consistently underperformed and failed to meet the hype.

@xxxlonewolf49

15 күн бұрын

Hype is Russia is just BullShit&Lies everywhere else

@matthewgibbs6886

15 күн бұрын

much like the west, i'm thinking all contractors are crooks.

@osnapitzbry

15 күн бұрын

Like all the gamechangers supplied to Ukraine?

@korana6308

15 күн бұрын

like what? can you give at least one example?

@WDLC1911

15 күн бұрын

@@osnapitzbry😂 Exactly. These pinheaded folk are 😵‍💫😜

That plane is the stealthiest plane ever built, because even the pilots couldn't find it. No, even better: The plane is so stealthy that even the plans for it were written with invisible ink. They simply can't build it.

@camojoe83

15 күн бұрын

Yeah, they're out of ammo, fighting with shovels and ww2 tanks, bla bla bla, everyone in the country is either deceased or rebelling, they're broke, cant make ammo or missiles and definitely can't sell oil anymore. Right? Right?

@JasRog1026

15 күн бұрын

It is so stealthty,even the aliens from area 51 cant see it 😂

@gdiwolverinemale4th

15 күн бұрын

B2 ... best known for its crash on the take-off

@radustana

14 күн бұрын

​@@gdiwolverinemale4that least that plane exists,cant say the same about the pak da

@gdiwolverinemale4th

14 күн бұрын

@@radustana Many types of planes exist. That does not mean they are what they claim to be. Most likely B2 is obsolete by now and can be detected by low-band and targeting radars. Why use it then instead of something cheaper?

Perfect question to ask!

@user-bt7nj3nh9b

3 күн бұрын

It's above your sky.... maybe 😂

It was so stealthy they forgot where they parked it.

@slevenkelevra3813

15 күн бұрын

Darn it. The "find my plane feature isn't working." 😢

@kaizer7568

2 күн бұрын

You mean the F35?

It’ll get shot down by an S 200 and then say it malfunctioned.

@X35C

15 күн бұрын

The aircraft or the S200? Oh now I get it. Both of them.

@sawney_bean

15 күн бұрын

Like the f-35?

@FactCheckerGuy

15 күн бұрын

@@sawney_bean Thanks for the input, Boris. : )

@RazorsharpLT

15 күн бұрын

@@sawney_bean Ah yes, because the F-35 got show down over America by Americans lmao Pathetic

@manishdyall4779

15 күн бұрын

If you believe that Ukrainian claim, you are delusional. a Tu-22M that fell out of the sky over Stavropol Krai is too far from the frontlines for it to be a Ukrainian kill, let alone with an outdated S-200 system.

Wow... Must be pretty stealthy!

@ChrisCappy, Task&Purpose: You can read Cyrillic/Russian. That's good.

B-21 only has 2500 NM? Very obvious mistake here. This means it has less range than a B-25 from WW2 era. B-21 is estimated to have a range equal or further than the B-2 (I.e. >8000NM)

3:30 Anyone else notice Chris' t-shirt change? 😂

@JoeOvercoat

15 күн бұрын

The hat & gun(s) in the background moved, as well. Someone was tidying up!

@nero3k

15 күн бұрын

I had to go back and check. I thought it was just me.

That Plane is so Stealthy, no one ever saw it, and never will !

The concept art for this plane looks pretty slick. If the internet has taught me anything, if it looks too cool to be true, it probably isn't real.

they seem to be doing just fine with good old artillery. wonder weapons dont work, that's one thing we've learned.

Napkinwaffen.

@X35C

15 күн бұрын

LOL!

@xxxlonewolf49

15 күн бұрын

Except napkins exist

@ZetaMoolah

15 күн бұрын

@@xxxlonewolf49lmfao

@weregarurumon3202

15 күн бұрын

​@@xxxlonewolf49and actually works

@ivancho5854

15 күн бұрын

Best comment. 🤣👍

It really sucks when you want to build a high tech, big ticket, bomber and find out you have severe corruption.

@cerealport2726

15 күн бұрын

Yeah, corruption is everywhere in the global military industrial complex. No country can escape it.

@beibotanov

15 күн бұрын

extremely funny joke in light of 90k bushings bag

@corneliusmcmuffin3256

10 күн бұрын

@@beibotanov jokes on you the American budget is so much bigger than Russia's that we could flatten Moskow in paper bills

@MrBirdonawire

5 күн бұрын

@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 haha! True we don’t even need bombs.

Kinzhal is an air launched ballistic missle as opposed to the zircon, which is a hypersonic cruise missile. Very different.

1:40 Slight correction, Yakolev also produced bombers up until the 70s as did Petlyakov (well 60s, because they merged). Beriev technically made bombers until the 80s, but the later ones were largely repurposed Tupolevs for niche roles. I think of all the military aviation companies Russia has had, only Mikoyan hasn't ever made a dedicated bomber of some description.

The T14, the ‘check mate’ & this continually provide us with entertainment 😂

@atanasvasilev3228

14 күн бұрын

Western tech cant handle even a simple, non-moving, humongous object as the Crimean bridge... Serious amount of weapons that are supposed to destroy it, provided by western states cant destroy it at ALL! It seems that Nato strategic and tactical forces wont have much more chances, since they will be firing the same stuff. Of course, we might consider stealth planes being somewhat more efficient, but shadow storm is as stealthy as f-35 if I am not mistaken, flies extremely low and is... wait for it... being shot a lot! Russians are the first Europeans to witness guns! They know guns! Dont be too "my team is the greatest ever, those others are puny". Its just overaction of you being hurt about it. You hurt yourself tho. 😂

@worldoftancraft

14 күн бұрын

I guess you still laugh about MBT-70, aren't you. How many years we still have to wait to see the fruits of American-German friendship of breeding imperial and metrics in cooperative development?

@MrGottaQuestion

14 күн бұрын

@@worldoftancraft I looked it up - cool read. However, it's not like Russia is collaborating with some other country, making the project complex. They fail in these projects all on their own. The Su57 could be a somewhat close analog, with India, but they were always meant to be a junior partner before pulling out.

@JB-pu8ik

14 күн бұрын

​@@worldoftancraftwe call it the Abrahams. It makes T series tanks go boom.

@JB-pu8ik

14 күн бұрын

​@@MrGottaQuestionMBT 70 kinda fell apart and then immediately turned into the Abrahms and Leopard.

I've been asking about the propaganda T-14 Armada. Where it at?

Its hard to say how much bypass air will be coming through the intakes, that can help defuse heat.

The whole "only air force to operate a stealth bomber" does exist in the context of only 3 countries still operating bombers at all, stealth or otherwise.

Changing your shirt halfway through made me think I was watching another video

Non western aircraft not being stealthy acording to "experts" is basically a meme at this point. The hoops they will jump thru to reach those conclusions can be quite entertaining.

@TheGalahad78

13 күн бұрын

This comment has way less upvotes than it deserves. Russian way of doing things is "good enough works" instead of "world-class-wunderwaffen". Western "experts" have been proven wrong time and again since the beginning of the SMO, and they still continue producing bullshit copium. Well, seeing the type of comments and how many upvotes they have, they have their audience, I guess.

I've been working on a new stealth bomber, too. I estimate a range of 128,000 km. I've just got to wirk out how the engines attach to the paper fuselage.

Everything I've heard and read says the b21 has a longer range than the b2. Its made with lighter materials, has a smaller payload capacity, and more efficient engines.

It's so stealthy that you can't see it.

If the Tu-160 is the Blackjack does that mean the PAK-DA is a Flapjack?

If no one ever saw it it could also be the best stealth bomber ever built. This thing is Schrödingers stealth bomber

Good analysis cappy

The prototype is so stealthy, they have parked it somewhere, but can't find it anymore...

@Caesarowicz

12 күн бұрын

It's on some Russian general's dacha, in the shape of a well maintained Bentley.

That's the first time I've heard of SEAD missions being carried out by slow-flying, highly-visible, easily-targetable, long-range non-stealth bombers.

@ali-haider5788

15 күн бұрын

Easily targeting ? Russian bombers use long range cruise missiles and ballistic missiles The kh22/32 range 2000km The kh101/102 range is 4500km Kh69 range is 400km Etc No air defense system have the range of even 300km imagine 4500km Also every bomber can carry 12 to 16 missile and thats is enough to destroy any system in the world

@highdefinist9697

15 күн бұрын

@@ali-haider5788 И я полагаю, их тоже никто не видел?

@corneliusmcmuffin3256

10 күн бұрын

​@@ali-haider5788 the F22 exists

@ali-haider5788

9 күн бұрын

@corneliusmcmuffin3256 what the hell does the f22 have to do with what i said

Usualy the numbers in such plans for a new aircraft in russia shows not only flyable prototypes.. if there is or example said the first batch of prototypes is 3 , then at bests 2 are flyable prototypes 1 is the static test prototype and often the first or second flyable prototype will be later used as non-flyable testing article for improved electronic and hydraulic parts as result of the first few TestFlights

I would not believe any stats from Russia or PRC.

@rasheedh7043

15 күн бұрын

I believe stats only from US arms manufacturer’s manual. 😂

@TiocfaidhArLa34

15 күн бұрын

@@rasheedh7043 well honestly they are probably more honest. lockheed martin knows that if you lie about all the specs the next contract might go to boeing.

@angelicaflanagan3483

15 күн бұрын

Every country's media is little biased. But Russia State Media just speaks complete lies and nonsense. America has a hundred different media sources. Russia has four or five State controlled media. Outlets, They are even trying to stop independent media on the internet for people to watch and listen to. Now I agree that on KZread, most of it is not true, but you should still have the freedom of choice, to decide to watch it or not.

@highdefinist9697

15 күн бұрын

@@rasheedh7043 О, правда. Откуда вам знать, если вы даже не говорите по-английски?

@rasheedh7043

15 күн бұрын

@@TiocfaidhArLa34 LMAO

It is as real as Optimus Prime , little green men and the chinesse stealth bomber

@MrGottaQuestion

14 күн бұрын

the little green men were real, unfortunately.

You should cover the unmanned stealth Iranian fighter jet coming out in August.

To all the people who wanna make the "Too stealthy that it disappeared" joke on this marvelous aircraft, remember that the Su-57 became the ("first 5th gen fighter jet to have a kill") in ukraine almost 2 years ago 😏

Won't come, as long as the existing Soviet era designs can do the job, too. And when it comes, it always has the risk of being already obsolete and based on a economy that no longer exists.

You lost me forever at "according to the Eurasian Times" 💀

@wootle

15 күн бұрын

This jumped out at me as well. That site and another very similar one called Military something (forgot its name) seem a bit iffy.

@yaksparrow2493

14 күн бұрын

​@wootle abit iffy is an understatement. They have published many completely bogus articles like; an article about how china is developing a supersonic submarine via laser propulsion (1413ms underwater).russia is also developing a misile with a rear mounted ir seaker(where the rocket motor sits).Make of that as you will.

@6:20 you quote a common misconception of lift that is absolutely absurd: air doesn't magically move faster over the top of the wing to create some sort of vacuum/low pressure effect and that's not how lift works.

1. Judging by indirect data: the new assembly shop in Kazan, built for the assembly of the PAK DA given for the urgent resumption of production of civilian Tu-214 2. Engine for PAK DA in the press called Izdelie RF 'Изделие РФ'

Is this like the T14? Will it be built in 2000never?

@426baron

14 күн бұрын

You're mean. At least 7 tanks were built 😂

@kaizer7568

2 күн бұрын

Too big and too expensive, so they cancelled it

You are getting famous...saw you do a commentary on the new "The Proof is out there, military issue". keep rocking it bro, your 15minutes is coming up...

Kazan is actually a pretty big city 1.5 million in population, capital of Tatarstan

"in a small Russian city of Kazan" :-) Kazan has a population of 1,250,000.Kazan is big city.

Kazan has about 2 million people...not sure it should be called a " small city"

@NocKme

15 күн бұрын

Was about to say. Kazan is one of the bigger cities in Russia

The Pak Da sounds like it's the Armata of the air.

Fun fact the US’s military expenditure is 1/2 of the Russian gdp

Just FYI, cannot see if someone already pointed it out though, as you are speaking of a Tu-160, often a 3D model of a different bomber, the Tu-22M, is shown

I thought the b21 had up to 7000-9000

Based on Russia's history of exaggerating the abilities of their weapons (and/or America overestimating them), I'd divide all of these estimates by two. Heck, that wooden mock-up might turn out to be the actual prototype!

@worldoftancraft

14 күн бұрын

how many wooden prototypes of T-50 turned to be actual prototypes of Su-57?

@mateuszzimon8216

12 күн бұрын

@@worldoftancraft U mean "stelth" bomber with gap in bombbay ....

@worldoftancraft

12 күн бұрын

@@mateuszzimon8216 imagine yourself making final conclusions based on early prototypes. The peak of internet expert thought

@mateuszzimon8216

12 күн бұрын

​@@worldoftancraft as coming form post-communism country, i can tell u if that was "prototype. production is even worse than that

@worldoftancraft

11 күн бұрын

@@mateuszzimon8216 I honestly didn't knew that being from some former communist country is I guess valued more than a Ph.d in some area.

Got it now, Chris is being sarcastic, that straight face fooled me!

Can you maybe make a video about the Benelux vs Russia just like you did with Poland, Lithuania, Finland and sweden

the fact that we're asking this question means they succeded at making the worlds stealthiest bomber

Russian wonder weapons just like the SU 57 or T-14 Armata

@loumcast

15 күн бұрын

The SU-57 wonder weapons is in production and it has already been used in Ukraine very successfully. Your biases and lack of knowledge are clogging your reasoning.

@Angl0sax0nknight

15 күн бұрын

@@loumcast so stealthy no one has seen it over Ukraine

@voidtempering8700

15 күн бұрын

​@@Angl0sax0nknightThe Su-57 is being used in a similar role as the Mig-31. It won't be over Ukraine when it launches a missile.

@loumcast

15 күн бұрын

@@Angl0sax0nknight That's what we are told, reality is different. Just like we were told the Russians were using shovels to fight in this war, demoralized, using old chips from washing machines for their weapons, or that Russia was going to run out of missiles withing six months after the war started. Take what you here on our propagandist US/western media with a grain of salt, probably half of the stuff we are told its BS and fake news.

@FactCheckerGuy

15 күн бұрын

@@voidtempering8700 If it can't be used over Ukraine, then its stealth sucks.

It does look pretty cool, a lot like a manta-ray.

You have the best background, I love the skeleton wearing the roman armor - how do I get one of those?