Where Are the T-14 Tanks?
Click this link to make some cash for giving your opinion! www.inflcr.co/SHIZi Thanks YouGov for sponsoring!
Check Out Project Owl on Discord
/ discord
For Business Inquiries - CovertCabal@Ellify.com
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
----------------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
The NATO Channel
Ministry of Defence of Estonia
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
KCNA - North Korea State Media
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
Пікірлер: 2 700
Hope you guys liked the video! I love using YouGov to make easy cash! Click my link: www.inflcr.co/SHIZi #YouGovPartner
@808INFantry11X
10 ай бұрын
Thanks CovertCabal your material is very well researched. 😊
@anfrex3342
10 ай бұрын
You have been asking stupid questions for several videos now, you simply refuse to accept that Ukraine is going to lose that war.
@FrankCostanza456
10 ай бұрын
Hey bro, do you have other channels? I heard your voice on something totally non-military related.
@user-bw6jg4ej2m
10 ай бұрын
@@anfrex3342 +15 rubles
@the0ne809
10 ай бұрын
@@anfrex3342kherson had billboards saying "forever Russia ". How did that work out? Also, Russia is literally not able to steamroll Ukraine even though they are literally next door. Admit it. Russia would be nothing without some nukes.
The T-14 follows the often skipped layer of the survivability onion: "Don't be there".
@archdornan8349
10 ай бұрын
Can't be hit if you never show up
@kirk7528
10 ай бұрын
Very rare when a youtube comment makes me audibly laugh
@Valorius
10 ай бұрын
@@archdornan8349 Just ask the F-22.
@vinhhoangkhai8329
10 ай бұрын
@@Valoriusay ay ay hold there buddy! It shot down a balloon alright?!
@Valorius
10 ай бұрын
@@vinhhoangkhai8329 Believe it or not, that is the only air to air kill over CONUS in history. All hail the mighty F-22! :D
The greatest stealth tank to ever exist. No one has ever even visually seen one in battle !
@samo2195
10 ай бұрын
😂
@tibchy144
10 ай бұрын
It was announced quite some time ago that due to economic situation as a result of sanctions T14s won't be produced in intended numbers, and that T90 and modernized versions of T72 will remain as a backbone of Russian tank units.
@theaterofsouls
10 ай бұрын
T-90s are okay though... i saw a video earlier, 1 russian tank annihilated an mechanized assault... not sure it it was a T-90 though
@SCH292
10 ай бұрын
Don't worry. Russia is making upgrades for T14. These new upgrades will be call,"T14MXBM323ZAB4".
@mrbaywatch21
10 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
Correction, the Soviets never stopped using the T-55. It was retired by Russia in the 2000s. Temporarily, ofc.
@grvc44
10 ай бұрын
Temporary LOL
@regu6582
10 ай бұрын
Russians in general mothball absolutely everything.
@Ostentatiousnessness
10 ай бұрын
Double correction: The Soviets never stopped using the T-55, the T-55 stopped using the Soviet Union in 1991.
@vctor6768
10 ай бұрын
Word👍👍😂😂
@vctor6768
10 ай бұрын
The Russians stopped using the Soviets , 😂
The T14 is one of the greatest parade floats ever built.
@dieterdodel835
10 ай бұрын
I still remember the one that caught fire at a parade...🤣🤣
@Meyohe
10 ай бұрын
@@dieterdodel835 source: trust me bro
@Helperbot-2000
10 ай бұрын
@@Meyohe well it didnt catch fire, but it hilariously broke down
@xilonffa2291
10 ай бұрын
@@Helperbot-2000no it didn’t you idiot, the driver put it in park. ITS A TANK IF YOU PUT A TANK IN PARK THAT TANK ISNT GOING TO MOVE AN INCH
@Meyohe
10 ай бұрын
@@britishgaming2 Yeah and when did it catch fire?
T-14 is so secret even RU doesn't know what the specs are
@idontknowhowtonamemychannel
10 ай бұрын
So secret that neither specs, nor location is known. One babushka in vodka infused dream told me about T-14 being hidden under rock near Moskva ship. Suposedly.
@elozinoemeovrode9779
10 ай бұрын
@@idontknowhowtonamemychannelmy God one cannot be this useless
@ettoreatalan8303
10 ай бұрын
@@idontknowhowtonamemychannel If the babushka drank Putinka vodka, the information must be correct. At least in the Russian world.
@chasemccall391
10 ай бұрын
@@idontknowhowtonamemychannel😅
@cocobunitacobuni8738
10 ай бұрын
wrong, it was in stealth mode along with the SU-57s
T-14: *comes out* Gaijin: Put it at 6.7
@mig0150
10 ай бұрын
With a premium version at 6.3 with 1mm less armour on the back
@icetea8946
10 ай бұрын
@@mig0150 nah, premium version would have the 152mm gun and be same BR like the Su9 and Su11 situation
@dxenomorph
10 ай бұрын
Woundnt suprise me
@dxenomorph
10 ай бұрын
@@mankeil4468 i think it fita better at 1.3
@Trollpharius_XX
10 ай бұрын
No no it should be 2.0
slight correction: The T-14 DOES have its ammo underneath the turret in a carousel autoloader just like the T-72, T-80, T-90, etc. It does have a small amount of ammo stored in the bustle, but you can only access it from the outside. Not sure why the Russians don’t go with a bustle autoloader with blowout panels like the Leclerc. edit: holy shit this just turned into a russian bot farm
@mintsamich
10 ай бұрын
@@apsoypike1956 True, but you also have a destroyed tank
@mintsamich
10 ай бұрын
@@apsoypike1956 Blowout panels on what? If the main ammo in the autoloader gets hit, the turret will rocket off. If you’re talking about the bustle storage, I guess it could but it’s unlikely it would get hit in the first place
@johanmetreus1268
10 ай бұрын
@@mintsamich If the ammo in the auto-loader gets hit, the flying turret is merely a signal that the crew needs burial and cremation already has taken place. Then again a hit there would be rather fatal for the crew anyways, even if there wasn't an autoloader installed.
@jamesjefferies3762
10 ай бұрын
@@apsoypike1956the engine might be improved by an explosion. 😂😂
@jamesjefferies3762
10 ай бұрын
@@apsoypike1956 oh I see, the separate compartment. Is that the upgraded Soyuz capsule?
Russia is that HOI4 player that researched modern tanks and has one factory on them, but can't tear itself away from its medium tank III production line.
@2639theboss
10 ай бұрын
God im not safe anywhere am i? I just want to build Canadian space marines but im too shit to make it work.
@buckshot9113
10 ай бұрын
They also still seem to have some Infantry Equipment ‘45 in service
@victorzvyagintsev1325
10 ай бұрын
Problem is overproduction of previous versions of the T-series. Why build new tanks when you have thousands of old ones collecting dust. Russia is not alone here, US got rid of its Abrams production line, Brits don't make new tanks, Germans can probably produce 1 a month...
@patrickstar5136
10 ай бұрын
@@victorzvyagintsev1325 because a lot of the old ones collecting dust are shit compared to modern tanks. The difference is that the US, UK and Germany aren't in an active war where you would expect a significant scale up in production.
@exoticdachoo007
10 ай бұрын
@@buckshot9113 Considering the shit the Germans were sending the Ukrainians I doubt either side is much better in this aspect
The weird part was that the T14 was not even present in the ww2 victory parade this year. Only a T34 was.
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
10 ай бұрын
Which should tell you what's coming. Don't poke the bear
@oledole1685
10 ай бұрын
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 /poke
@BeardofBeesPool
10 ай бұрын
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479the oncoming collapse of Russa is coming
@paytonestrada7746
10 ай бұрын
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 The total defeat of the Russian forces, that's the only thing that's coming.
@icetea8946
10 ай бұрын
Prob just wanted to make the parade as short as possible, i remember last year and every other year one being a few hours long. A lot of new vehicles that arent in ukraine but are paraded through moscow on victory day like the Kurganets-25 , bumerang and T-15 werent present to. Plus wasnt there like a few ukrainian drone strike on moscow like the week before parade day ?
All the money meant for T14 production got skimmed a little bit by the MoD, then the design engineers, then the factory managers, and finally the technician on the assembly line. What was left was only enough to build the tank chasis with nothing for the electronics.
@start2957
10 ай бұрын
Die you get this information from zelensky?
@wai828
10 ай бұрын
@@start2957 The fact Russia is unable to use them in Ukraine proves his point.
@TankswillRule
10 ай бұрын
@@start2957234 people involved in the T-14 got arrested under corruption charges… all got released lol
@ThaGr1m
10 ай бұрын
@@start2957no we got this based off of every single production line in russia... Since before the cold war started... That's literally how everything they do works...
@mbak7801
10 ай бұрын
@@start2957 No from inside Russia itself. Everyone helps themselves to everything. Hence a military order results in a billion USD yacht being ordered by the factory owner.
The real T-14 Armatas are the friendship we made along the way
@TF2Scout..
10 ай бұрын
Lol
I'm not sure about their tanks, but they definitely have some bad ass yachts.
@Jermo7899
10 ай бұрын
That very few have
@nunuknowstheway6710
9 ай бұрын
Russian taxpayers pay for 2000 T14 tanks, one billionaire get’s a new super yacht. Welcome to Russia. Have another sip of Vodka.
@buckbenelli8
9 ай бұрын
Which they don’t build. Has anyone ever bought something made in Russia other than an AK or vodka?
@matejfele9971
9 ай бұрын
@@buckbenelli8 Escorts.
@Jartran72
8 ай бұрын
Sure, western build yachts be premium for sure. And those corrupt and stealing russian oligarchs can afford them. They have the billions.
They'll show up in the battle of Moscow together with the parade T-34, the Maus and whatever else they can salvage from Kubinka museum
@jblob5764
10 ай бұрын
Maus would be entertaining to see half buried in the middle of the road like a bunker like the germans did in Berlin with panthers
@chris8612
10 ай бұрын
I know it won't happen, but just the thought of lossing all those historical tanks hurt.
@kamikaziking
10 ай бұрын
along with the LEO's and the Bradleys and the rest of the western junk........
@user-do5zk6jh1k
10 ай бұрын
Tbh, I don't think a Battle of Moscow will happen. An assassination will probably happen before it gets to that point.
@___seb3341
10 ай бұрын
@@jblob5764We have seen the Ghost of Kiev, now get ready for the Maus of Moscow
Yes, arms exports are vital for Russia. That's the exact reason why we won't see the T-14 in Ukraine. If we'll get footage of a T-14 exploding after getting hit by a rock, they can kiss those sweet, sweet exports goodbye.
@diymicha2
10 ай бұрын
no nation wants to buy that thing in the 1st place already :)
@wandameadows5736
10 ай бұрын
Russia recently made an arms deal with African Nations. Russians really hit bottom.
@off6848
10 ай бұрын
So like leopards
@mitchellhermansen1836
10 ай бұрын
@@off6848 except leopards aren't cowering in fear like t14
@off6848
10 ай бұрын
@@mitchellhermansen1836 there’s no reason to rush out an expensive tank like that any tank will be destroyed by 155mm guns They aren’t retarded like NATO
Meanwhile the turret was wiggling all over the place while the Armata was doing that spin.
@ColonelSandersLite
10 ай бұрын
Yeah, that caught my eye. Either the stabilization system was not installed or it was not functional. Either way, you would think they would have censored that clip.
@dxenomorph
10 ай бұрын
@@ColonelSandersLitefor them it was probably stable when editing the video
@worldoftancraft
10 ай бұрын
@@ColonelSandersLitestabilization system is usually not online until crew decides to. We all live in post-war Era, where costs of maintenance is the determinator of the way things are used.
@ColonelSandersLite
10 ай бұрын
@@worldoftancraft That's utter nonsense. Along with wear on the drive system, the part of that demonstration that would be causing actual significant wear and tear is traversing the turret. Which they were doing anyways.
@ColonelSandersLite
10 ай бұрын
@@dxenomorph [sarcasm]Yeah, I know what you mean. I posted a video of Usain Bolt walking in a parking lot but it really seemed like he was running pretty dang fast when I edited the video.[/sarcasm]
I can't help feeling, if Stalin came to power in Russia now, the purges would be epic.
@mikoi7472
10 ай бұрын
The purges are already happening, just to consolidate power.
@Irobert1115HD
10 ай бұрын
well putin is a stalinist.
@popinmo
10 ай бұрын
actually they would ethier be worse off or the same i doubt he would be any different a country ran the way putin and stallin want doesn't work today infact it barely worked in 1940
@datadavis
10 ай бұрын
Yea they have way too few purges, a 100% purge of the power elite would be adequate.
@antred11
10 ай бұрын
@@popinmo Have you heard of this hip, new thing all the cool kids are doing? PUNCTUATION. 😬
Russia has deployed 500 of them in Ukraine fully equipped with cloaks of invisibility so you can't see them.
@DOSFS
10 ай бұрын
Correction - 500,000 of Armata already in Ukraine CHECKMATE WESTOID
@ciaranbrk
10 ай бұрын
Yeah with a complement of Romans with photon torpedos lol ji jk.
@SCH292
10 ай бұрын
"N rEal lIfe it w0nt bE 1 oN 0nE!". ----->Russian tank fan boys in a nut shell.
@jtf2dan
10 ай бұрын
ONE MILLION Armatas in ukraine...ALL with Poseidon Nuclear Torpedoes!
@kuunoooo7293
10 ай бұрын
Just like the ukrainian BM-OPLOT 😂 the ukrainian mod told me they had deployed 5000 of them but wr havent even seen a single one
A few months ago the russian MoD published some propaganda footage of their modern tank factory at work. Funnily enough there was a covered armata in the background which appeared to be the exact same one from a video from 2 years earlier, not having moved an inch. Not sure if we'll ever see that thing on a battlefield.
@richardkammerer2814
10 ай бұрын
Probably not shipped west, anyway.
@off6848
10 ай бұрын
We’ve already seen it as the bmp3 terminator
@sjonnieplayfull5859
10 ай бұрын
Maybe if the factory becomes a battlefield?
@ohgeazy
9 ай бұрын
They don’t need to use it, 50 year old equipment is dissolving Ukrainian forces.
@sjonnieplayfull5859
9 ай бұрын
@@ohgeazy Lies! The entire Ukrainian army was destroyed last year, all the Russians day so! Go, drive forward with open hatches, and you leading them, all you need is some courage!
I remember 6 years ago arguing with a ruskieboo and he brings up the T-14. I look up the T-14 and they had about 20 total and I am like " what are they going to do with 20 tanks?" while laughing my azz off.
@worldoftancraft
10 ай бұрын
Exactly what the Americans are doing with declining fleet of Raptors.
@zebra6636
10 ай бұрын
@@worldoftancraft What will the 6 working Su57 going to do against 180 F-22's and 400 F-35's ?
@worldoftancraft
10 ай бұрын
@@zebra6636 meet
@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleine
10 ай бұрын
@@zebra6636 Cause some infighting because only one of them can become an ace.
@tatataloo5217
10 ай бұрын
@@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleineI’ll bet that after you typed that, you liked in the mirror so you could tip your fedora to yourself. You’re so confident in a platform that is objectively worse along every metric that matters, when Russia isn’t even that confident and that’s why they haven’t made enough of them to be noteworthy.
If Covert Cabal can't find the T14 then Putin has no chance of finding it.
@cdgncgn
10 ай бұрын
this is a spy outfit.
@thehusketeers4319
10 ай бұрын
What your saying is.. if a KZreader can't find it then a KGB officer can't find it?
@ajitdubey9990
10 ай бұрын
@@thehusketeers4319he was not a high ranking kgb officer he was a street spy in Berlin, so yeah covert cabal is more sophisticated than putin
@chrisb7198
10 ай бұрын
@@thehusketeers4319 It's FAB now and yes that's what he is saying.
@Trollpharius_XX
10 ай бұрын
Wym? All T-14 is currently stored with Heavy Cruiser Moskva
So stealthy you can't see them, it's just that good
@watchingvids9899
10 ай бұрын
such a fresh joke. one more about flying turret please
@BlyatimirPootin
10 ай бұрын
@@watchingvids9899one more about shovels please
@Oblivisci........
10 ай бұрын
@@watchingvids9899Cope more Ivan
@Cryptic211_
10 ай бұрын
@@watchingvids9899Because thats true, u r just mad
@krusader85
10 ай бұрын
@@watchingvids9899 I will stfu if it appears en mass on the battlefield? Deal?
6:56 Alongside those I'd also like to mention the T-15 Aramata IFV, Kurganets-25, Bumerang, and 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV
@chrisb7198
10 ай бұрын
@@thorru3638 ka-52's are getting shot down pretty easy also. Just more russian junk.
@adamkiraly9805
10 ай бұрын
@thorru3638 over 25% of KA 52s are dead
@adamkiraly9805
10 ай бұрын
@@thorru363840 out of 133 in service are scrap
@worldoftancraft
10 ай бұрын
Kurganec, Koaliciâ.
Never have so many videos been made on a tank which has been seen so rarely.
@flabby2142
10 ай бұрын
fr
@victorzvyagintsev1325
10 ай бұрын
T-35 probably has more videos on it, yet also was a rare beast.
@sjonnieplayfull5859
10 ай бұрын
Bob Semple wants to have a word
@Jartran72
8 ай бұрын
does not exist* The capabilities are only on paper. It is a victory day (lol) parade show piece, nothing else.
Imagine the US invading Mexico and losing so many M1s we had to pull M47 tanks out of mothballs to replace those losses. That's where Russia is right now.
@Trisket
10 ай бұрын
Don't forget about that one Saturday when Guy Fieri took his Flavortown PMC battalion back across the US border and drove to DC because he was fed up with his men being shelled by the US Army.
@thedungeondelver
10 ай бұрын
@@Trisket Yeah, that fits the paradigm perfectly, too!
“A lot of the details about the T-14 are secret…” Ummm… A lot of the details about the T-14 are imaginary…
@musclecargarage2875
10 ай бұрын
Ok Ukrainian puppet. But NATO IS loosing in Ukrainian war
@TohaBgood2
10 ай бұрын
Lol, but yes actually. The engine, for example, simply does not exist in any sort of operational form. It's literally mostly fantasy.
@RedXlV
10 ай бұрын
The T-14 physically exists (barely).
@TohaBgood2
10 ай бұрын
@@RedXlV The engine most certainly does not exist in a service-ready state. They had a prototype fail on the Red Square during a parade. Showing off Wunderwaffen during parades is 90% of what the Russian army does. That's pretty much the whole reason why it exists. If the T-14 couldn't even manage that then for all intents and purposes it does not exist. It's a psyop.
@voidtempering8700
10 ай бұрын
@@TohaBgood2How did you come to that conclusion?
Since no Tank can survive a direct hit of a 155 mm artillery grenade and considering the accuracy of modern artillery that's receiving corrections directly by drones the Russians would be even more stupid as they already are if they send their 30 or 40 T-14 to the front lines where they would be the biggest trophy for each gunner on the battlefield.
@baronvonlimbourgh1716
10 ай бұрын
Then why build new tanks? What are they going to do, have them sit around for 20 years until they are completely outdated and then use them? Might as well just build them 20 years from now when their technology will be much cheaper to manufacture.
@yoface938
10 ай бұрын
Pretty much why everyone has nuclear weapons. Almost every authoritarian or communist country that’s run afoul the US has not survived to this day.
@515coldfire
10 ай бұрын
@@baronvonlimbourgh1716russians are creating anti drones built in to each tank. Dont worry. Russians focus on countering tech this is why we are in a trench warfare. Nato didnt expect it will be this kind of war. So you can have all the advance tech in the world if you cant use it then you are back to the oldways
@habi0187
10 ай бұрын
@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 that's a good question. It might be that we see the end of an era at the moment. The Ukrainians have shown in their successful defence that Tanks might be no longer the kings of the battlefield. On the other hand without Tanks a counteroffensive is also not feasible it seems.
@baronvonlimbourgh1716
10 ай бұрын
@@habi0187 the tank isn't going anywhere. Active defences will just have to catch up. Reytheons hel system for example is a direct counter to these threats.
The qualities of the T-14 are irrelevant because what Russia absolutely lacks is trained tank crews. In the US, tanker training is 12 months, before the Special Military Operation, Russian training was a fraction of that. Now training is basically non-existent or rudimentary at best. Any tank with an incompetent crew is ineffective, but versus FPV drones, Javelin, Brimstone missiles and drone-corrected artillery, all Russian tanks are moments from destruction
@off6848
10 ай бұрын
Give me a break Russia has the best tank crews on earth right now just off of experience
@chrisb7198
10 ай бұрын
@@off6848 The trouble is most russian tank crews are no longer on earth, after they get hit they get launched into orbit.
@JJ-3033
10 ай бұрын
@@chrisb7198no, the problem is your brains are washed. Ukraine has no trained personnel because all are dead. Russians does rotate…
@biofoot7874
10 ай бұрын
@@off6848I think you're off by about 2 meters. At least with those tankers who weren't cremated at least.
@gianttacogod
10 ай бұрын
They teach you how to drive and how to shoot, pat you on the back and spray paint on a Z.
The answer is pretty straightforward: incompetence and corruption. They are incapable of overcoming design flaws and developement has dragged on indefinitely. And their connections ensure that the project will not be killed despite making zero meaningful progress in years. Edit: Damn there is quite the war going on the replies. The obvious comparisons are to the F22 and the F35 but are just comparing apples to oranges. Both projects dragged on for far too long and cost far too much, but in the end a weapon was delivered. The USA has the money to force a program to completion, the Russians do not. Why? Incompetance and Corruption.
@Valorius
10 ай бұрын
Is that why the F-22 was never committed in the war on terror?
@nicolomatias2223
10 ай бұрын
@@Valoriuswhy would it be? How many 5th gen fighters do the Taliban or Al Qaeda have?
@DAndyLord
10 ай бұрын
@@Valorius I think that's more akin to not issuing RPGs to meter maids.
@Valorius
10 ай бұрын
@@DAndyLord Very possibly 🤣
@Valorius
10 ай бұрын
@@nicolomatias2223 If Warheads on foreheads is the mantra then the F-22 is perfectly qualified to perform that mission....allegedly. Russia seems to be doing fine without their T-14s, so why commit them?
The Armata is a parade float. The T-14 is positioned safely on the production floor far from the War. Along with the rest of Russian wonder weapons
@andromidius
10 ай бұрын
Heck, even saying its on the production floor is generous. Its mostly still in blueprints.
@ExUSSailor
10 ай бұрын
It's not even very good at being a parade float, since one of them actually broke down during the Victory Day parade.
@SCH292
10 ай бұрын
You guys ever heard of the term Ricer car? Yeah. Russia's T14 is a ricer tank.
@rincontibio7664
10 ай бұрын
@@ExUSSailor it didn't broke, the crew didn't knew how to properly operate the tank, to be honest that's the main problem with the Armata
@robertpatrick3350
10 ай бұрын
@@rincontibio7664so the crew picked from the elite of the Russian military were too dumb to operate the tank…….that explains a lot.
The only thing I know about the T-14 is there's less than 30 examples, half of those are running and at least one of those running examples has it's turret stuck rotating.
@okbutthenagain.9402
10 ай бұрын
There are actually 115
I love how in ALL the clips you showed the Barrel was NEVER stabilized… wtf
I think they weren’t planning on deploying them in the beginning and once they saw how fast they were losing tanks they couldn’t afford it
@PeterSedesse
10 ай бұрын
Like the Terminators, they have only been deployed to the NE section of the luhansk region because they don't have enough of either to have maintenance logistics for them.. so when the Terminators break down, they are just hauled back to belgorod and are never seen again.
@winzyl9546
10 ай бұрын
Or just that it barely works and still needs to be developed.
@troymash8109
10 ай бұрын
They have 18 of them. Only half those run. The engine is an EXACT copy of the POS in a German Tiger 85 years ago. It is a fake tank.
@skeeyee5477
10 ай бұрын
@@troymash8109Nothing against Lazerpig or his vids but his T-14 Armata video was far from his best work. You're thinking of the German SLA 16 engine which wasnt ever approved for service in any german combat vehicles outside being tested in a jagdtiger and fitted in a Tiger II hull. The Maybach V-12 was the renowned "shitty tiger engine" and the 12H360 engine from the T-14 is far from being based on either design. The original article used by lazerpig that claimed all of this may as well have put their sources as "we made it the fuck up" because they had none. T-14 is still overhyped as shit tho
@ineedapharmists
10 ай бұрын
@@skeeyee5477 its still using the V2 engine from the 30s. Albeit the engine has been continuously upgraded it's still a 1930s engine with better parts.
Interesting and informative as always. Thanks.
Kinda hard to build one of these tanks with all the high tech electronics that make it so great when you can no longer get the high tech electronics.
They will only enter service after the results of the 2023 turret toss competition comes in.
This just shows how impressive it was that the Germans were able to bang out so many tanks of different designs during WW2
@halthammerzeit
10 ай бұрын
They even designed engine for T14 armata.😂
@Manuelslayor
10 ай бұрын
Not nescecarlly! Russia has yet to enter actual war economy. War economy is a state in which all industries are "drafted" in to the war efort. Car manufacturers produce spare parts for tanks, food manufacturers produce MRE's, fabric manufacturers produce parachutes, mashining places turn shells, chemical plants make explosives and so on. Russia is not elocating resources for tank development because they have no factory to make them. It is also more complicated to produce modern equipment of any sort. Its not joust a armored tractor with a gun that about hits where you aim anymore. You cant joust make a new tank by sticking a biger gun or puting more metal on a tank. It is also especially dificult for russia. Most modern technology requires semi conductors..........you know the thing the west produces and is now witholding from russia. So they would have to: 1st: Research how to manufactor semiconductors and build production factorys after the research. 2nd: Design a modern tank. 3rd: Develop equipment for the tank which is no longer 20 to 30 years behind. 4th: Build the factorys then the tanks and then test them. 5th: Ensure that the funding does not get embezzeld during the whole process to ensure a quality product. 1, 3 and 4 would take time while 5 is imposible.
@MrVjjorge
10 ай бұрын
@@Manuelslayorslava shovels 🙌🏽🙌🏽💪🏽💪🏽
@voidtempering8700
10 ай бұрын
@@halthammerzeitAre we really bringing up that myth. If you want to criticize the engine, be accurate.
@sjonnieplayfull5859
10 ай бұрын
@@voidtempering8700it's not an upgraded Tiger Porsche engine?
The point about the Chinese arms industry is a good one. Particularly given both how poorly the Russians are doing in Ukraine and their inability to fulfill the contractual obligations they already have, it is highly likely that their position as the world's second largest arms supplier is going to disappear fairly shortly. Their single biggest customer (India) has publicly stated its dissatisfaction with Russian equipment quality and delivery reliability. Without India footing the bill, Russia simply has no development budget for new designs and manufacturing. India is also the easiest of customers for Russia given that it has strategic conflicts with its neighbor China and is historically suspicious of Western military and diplomatic ties. That said, Russia's track record of shipping crap that doesn't work, supporting it piss poorly, and routinely missing delivery and development deadlines has left them no other choice than to look to America for its needs. Putin's decision to invade Ukraine has really shown Russia's bare ass to the world.
@arthurmoore9488
10 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter what the politics are. If a potential supplier may not be available in the future that's a problem. However, if the current supplier can't meet the needs today, then that's a much larger issue. Whatever can be said about western arms sales, the US and Europe is not in the habit of taking already sold equipment for their own armies.
@doncarlodivargas5497
10 ай бұрын
To attack Ukraine must have been the mistake of the century, it is almost unbelievable how it is possible to have so little common sense, I think most people was really afraid of Russia and its military might, now we see miserable "wineos" stealing toilets, same with the status the regime in Kreml had, even I considered them as pretty capable and with a better grasp of reality than the west, and by actually going to war we can see it is all an illusion, plus, Lavrov that had a very high authority in the world act like an insane fool, had it been a movie I would said it was ridiculous
@henryquecabral9357
10 ай бұрын
Brazilian POV: China still have to vastly improve their customer service and deal flexibility, Russia was bad at it, when Brazil bought Mi-35Ms they were quickly out of service cause Russia wouldn't allow for the training of Brazilian industries to build its own parts. To the point where if the Brazilian air force needed some heavy maintenance on those they had to be shipped back to Russia! That was completely unacceptable for the Brazilian AF and those gunships were retired. China, from our experience, so far is the same if you want you can cheaply buy heavy quantities of said material but you would resort to canibalize those vehicles for parts and maintenance very soon as china is very secretive and won't train your industries/ground crews for more than light maintenance. That's why most neutral countries are refraining from buying anything Chinese in it's current open contracts. When China modernize it's current customer service I can't a reason why they wouldn't be able to take over the arms contracts for neutral countries.
@baronvonlimbourgh1716
10 ай бұрын
Just 1 of manny problems being created by this war for russia. Some of which will have large ongoing concequences far into the future.
@rerror3577
10 ай бұрын
Aside from China's competition, the three day special operation was the most expensive advert ever produced for NATO weapons.
I'm a lot more cynical that you are, CC. How many Armatas do you ever see at one time? Then that's how many they have. Maybe eight. From other vlogs, I think the idea was that Indian orders would provide the funding to mass produce the Armata. Neither of which has happened. Given Western sanctions, I think the number of Armatas is going to be a dwindling asset from now on.
@phbrinsden
10 ай бұрын
Added to which India is more than capable of designing and building its own tanks. If they can build an aircraft carrier from scratch they can certainly build a decent tank. If they really wanted to buy a decent tank they could choose an excellent one from S.Korea.
@Arminiuswolfspeer
10 ай бұрын
Uhmm maaaybe you're delusional, or maybe you are high on American and Ukrop propaganda. The Ruble is the best preforming currency and the Russian economy is growing. Western Sanctions weakened the West, and released Russia from the noose that is the Petro Dollar. And guess what, BRICS is expanding rapidly and lots of IMF addicted countries are looking for a way out.
@worldoftancraft
10 ай бұрын
@@phbrinsdenprObAblEe build a tank. From the creators of "they are going to build the high tech technology despite being a colonial shithole and it'll eliminate their poverty". An assumption. Their MBT was produced in number slightly higher per year, than Armata. That's already enough. Not to mention that all truly hard to engineer things are questionable: propulsion and FCS.
The armata is so stealthy it is more invisible than john cena
@CyrilSneer123
10 ай бұрын
Is it more stealthy than an Abrams or challenger though?
@ythandle825
9 ай бұрын
@@CyrilSneer123well, no. And considering that nazi germany have built better engines than what is used in your sad attemt in making a tank. So its quite likely that you just could not manage to drive it to the front. 😂
Their 8 T14s are hanging out with their 7 SU57s
@ms3862
10 ай бұрын
And the one cardboard SU-75 Femboi
Who needs tanks when you have an army of trolls who tell the world you are winning anyway?
@orenalbertmeisel3127
10 ай бұрын
How’s the Ukrainian spring offensive doing?
@ShitboxFlyer
10 ай бұрын
@@orenalbertmeisel3127Better than russias last offensive
@riggs61
10 ай бұрын
@@orenalbertmeisel3127how’s that 3 day special military operation going my guy? Keep crying Boris. 😂
@orenalbertmeisel3127
10 ай бұрын
@@ShitboxFlyer LMAO. When did Russia go on an offensive? Oh it’s an offensive you just made up. And oh btw during this summer Ukraine has lost more Leopard 2's than what Russia has lost of its T-90's during the entire war. And they haven’t reached Melitopol. Now that’s what I call winning.
@bombarderoazul
10 ай бұрын
The ukrainian trolls say Ukraine is winning, but in reality their much awaited counteroffensive has been a colossal failure.
Thank you for the work and effort you put into researching your videos. The quality of your information is top tier. On a platform filled with speculators and BS commentators, you truly are a breath of fresh air.
@noop9k
9 ай бұрын
This is russian propaganda
@codedlogic
9 ай бұрын
@@noop9k The Kremlin should sack him immediately. He's the worst Russian Propagandist I've ever seen. He keeps posting negative information about Russia and positive information about Ukraine.
Another great presentation, thanks for sharing it on KZread
The Brotherhood of Nod wishes their tanks were this invisible.
Always a pleasure to see a covert cabal video
Well, since they probably only actually built the odd dozen needed for parades and embezzeled the rest of the budget, I highly doubt we'll be seeing those things anywhere near the frontline (if ever they actually work)...
anxiously waiting for update of each type ty sir
Great content as always
Very informative video, I didn't know they were that big
Considering that Russia has a defense budget of about 10% that of the US. It isn’t a surprise that they can’t fund expensive programs. That 80-90 billion has to support the Russian army, navy , Air Force and nuclear systems.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
10 ай бұрын
Purchase power parity means that their budget is equivalent to a third of the US DoD budget. The US spends more, but the US has to pay American workers, unreal upcharging due to regulations and the nature of business in the West.
@phbrinsden
10 ай бұрын
The budget also has to support “leakage” into a number of pockets.
@baronvonlimbourgh1716
10 ай бұрын
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD ppp isn't 10 to 1 between the usa and russia. And it isn't just the defense budget. A lot of money is spent on other technology and science that allow these systems to be built in the first place which is in essence "freely available" to these companies but are essential to the product. That only increases the difference between both countries budgets but also capability.
@Toronto-Brad
10 ай бұрын
@@Nick-mt4wkyou can say the same thing with the US MIC contractors. Those guys want a guaranteed profit for any item of Procurement provided. If there isn't sufficient profit, the contractor will not sign the contract. In Russia, especially in wartime, they produce materials for the benefit of the nation and not the benefit of the shareholders. You can see now with the Lancet 53 drone, that Russia is producing and now working on a fully autonomous loitering drone.
@ImBigFloppa
10 ай бұрын
@@Toronto-Brad About a decade ago, the Russian chief military prosecutor Sergei Fridinsky did an investigation on where the military budget went and it was pretty damn bad. According to him, 20% of every single Ruble spent on the military just vanished. Not to overpriced equipment or the like, just vanished. Fake companies, fake contracts, kickbacks for members of government. It isn't surprising to see why. There is zero transparency. The American budget, for example, you can know so much. You can see exactly how much we are spending for GMLRS rockets, F-35 production, maintenance of tanks, procurement of new tanks etc. For Russia, it is little more than a blank check to do with whatever the Russian government wants. Everyone who has power in Russia is getting their cut of the pie, to the point where what remains for the actual military is cut down extensively.
Fascinating material! Thanks.
My money is on the tanks being in a repair depot, waiting on parts and mechanics who’ve long since been shipped off to Ukraine.
@PeterSedesse
10 ай бұрын
It is the same problem that Ukraine has to overcome when dealing with so many varieties of western tanks. Tanks are very maintenance heavy, and you need to keep a unique logistics system in place for each type of tank. It would be nearly impossible for Russia to keep a maintenance system in place for T14s on the southern front, just not worth it for so few tanks.
@donkey459
10 ай бұрын
@@PeterSedesseyeah but Ukraine has the support of NATO so spare parts is something I'm not worried about
@PeterSedesse
10 ай бұрын
@@donkey459 it isn't something that can't overcome, especially since they have a shorter and easier logistics line. For T14s, Russia would have to go from belgorod, all the way around the Donbas to get to the southern front...for maybe a handful of tanks. More than likely they are just keeping the T14s and the Terminators in NE luhansk.
@ImBigFloppa
10 ай бұрын
@@PeterSedesse There are no T-14s anywhere in Ukraine, and the few dozen Terminators Russia does have are just T-72s with some laughably inaccurate autocannons and some ATGMs on the top.
Fun fact! The T-14 is a development of a development of a development of a development of a T-72B. Yep! I lost a lot of brain power going down that rabbit hole.
@JustAsPlanned1
10 ай бұрын
T-14 isn’t based on anything previous. It’s T-90M which is an upgrade of an upgrade.
@betsylatimer-sayer7161
10 ай бұрын
@@JustAsPlanned1 Oh my sweet summer child. The T-14 is a development of the Object 195 (which despite what lazerpig says was actually a program). The Object 195 is a development of the Object 187M, seeking to take that design and give it a crew capsule. The Object 187M is a development of the Object 187, which lengthened the hull by a road wheel. The Object 187 is a massive Late-Soviet early Russian program which was a development of the T-72B. Honestly the 187 is one of the most interesting Late-Soviet Tanks, and is related to almost every tank project the Russians have undertaken post collapse. Relikt (Potentially); the A-85 Engine; Welded Turrets; Digital FCS; the 2A66 Anker Gun (Tho this didn't go anywhere); that camo net they put over T-72B2 and some of the T-90Ms. I could talk about the 187 for hours. But yeah, that's how it's a development of a development of a development of a T-72B. I'm happy to link this google doc I've got of my schitso research if you'd like.
@JustAsPlanned1
10 ай бұрын
@@betsylatimer-sayer7161 Sounds like Theseus Ship dilemma to me. Of course we can say that most tanks are designed with previous models in mind.
@alexanderwolf8766
10 ай бұрын
@@betsylatimer-sayer7161 Ferrari is designed around the development of the wheel 4,000 years ago
@alexanderwolf8766
10 ай бұрын
@@betsylatimer-sayer7161 and all your tanks too
2:19 It can also carry two beer kegs into batlle without interfering with gun traverse. (Unlike the T 90's measly single 12 pack capacity and gun blocking rear cooler). Tank mines? Two words... Hover Tank!
@icyknightmare4592
10 ай бұрын
A hover tank worthy of the name would still produce a lot of ground vibration from the lift fans/jets, and it would still be made of metal. Anti tank mines with magnetic or seismic trigger mechanisms would probably work against it. The armor would also have to be quite thin since by necessity a hover tank would have to be substantially lighter than a modern MBT.
@bastiaan7777777
10 ай бұрын
@JoeBLOWFHB I also noticed that, yet: if the turret points rearwards, the gun can not be leveled horizontally or aimed lower, so if an enemy (tank) is behind you, you can not shoot it. Seems strange.
This is a really good video. The satellite analysis is always really amazing.
The SU-57 was touted as the 5th gen jet that would destroy western air forces. Don't quote me on this but at the end, I think they built 4: 1 complete, 2 prototypes and 1 for spare parts.
@buckshot9113
10 ай бұрын
Didn’t one of the prototypes catch on fire?
@CassKix
10 ай бұрын
The SU 57 is so fucking big you can see it on every fucking radar, the f22 is a already a very big jet, but you could mistake the su57 for a fucking bomber xdd
@Hellhound23691
10 ай бұрын
They have fucking wood screws in it.
@kukuc96
10 ай бұрын
@@CassKix By Sukhoi's own materials, the radar cross section of the Su-57 is about equal to an F-18... A plane that's definitely not stealthy.
@guywhodoesstuff3314
9 ай бұрын
@@CassKixF-22 may be big, but that radar cross-section is ridiculously small. More than what can be said for the Su-57.
They are just so advanced they are invisible 😅
@blablubb8615
10 ай бұрын
They are so new, they dont even exist yet.
@cocobunitacobuni8738
10 ай бұрын
like the SU-57
@Whiskey11Gaming
10 ай бұрын
Ironically, have you seen the new active IR systems on western tanks which can change their heat signature to look like a car? That's nuts
@buckshot9113
10 ай бұрын
@@Whiskey11Gaming and have you seen this crazy thing called crew survivability that was supposed to be in the T-14? Wierd.
I heard the T-14 was guarding Moscow and the Kerch bridge! 😂
@cocobunitacobuni8738
10 ай бұрын
you are wrong. there is only one and it is in the parade warehouse waiting for the next parade.
great video as always
Wow, love the explanation of getting the parade day shot!
The T-14 is so advanced, it's not in the plane of existence
By my estimates the Russian federation could have fielded 14 t14 back in early 2022 and 18 now... but this assumes significant input of resources...
Diligent and knowledgeable, good informational video. Well done.
Russia made a doc about the production of T14s in 2016 and again in late 2022. In both you can see the same tanks on the assembly line in the exact same positions. The same goes for the tools and parts. You used a part of the 2022 video. So it can be assumed that since 2016 not a single T14 left this particular factory. So every T14 they have was build prior to that and then modified and upgraded.
Potatin won't let them get dirty, or they'll lose that "new tank" smell.
I dont think think this comment will ever be read by Cabal, but u mate do just unbelievable work with satelite imagery, especially for an open source of white intel
@ifv2089
10 ай бұрын
As a red Intel specialist... I've seen your msg and will pass it on 😂
i love how you just give the information with little to no bias or opinion.
It is such a bad design anyway. Moving crew to the hull does not mean that the turret can skip on armour, because it makes it easy to mission kill it.
Russia has been taking L's.
Don't forget the Sukhoi Su-75 Checkmate too.
@TankswillRule
10 ай бұрын
“The Femboy” xd
@SCH292
10 ай бұрын
SU57, SU75 and MIG41. Lol
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
10 ай бұрын
It's only a concept. The Su-57 and Armata were "supposed" to be in production.
Maybe the real Armatas was the friends we made along the way.
The engine was a copy of a German (austrian) WW2 Steyr X shaped watercooled radial
Where are the SU57s, where is the air superiority, where is the leadership, intelligence, bravery. Better question, where is all the vodka?
@Erusean_pilot
4 ай бұрын
They drank all the vodka…😔
They are with all the SU-57s, in the museum of future won’t ever make its, just test models for the last ten years
Terrific video!
Please keep up the great work
Your ability to purchase, analyze, and summarize OSINT and IMINT is truly impressive. A tip of the hat sir!
It's undefeated, and they plan to keep it that way.
My comment is that the turret ring at the base of the turret is a 'shell trap'. A hit there will disable the vehicle if not destroy it. Which may explain why it really hasn't been deployed let alone have production ramped up.
@krydas9050
9 ай бұрын
Shell trapping isn't really a thing anymore since modern Tanks use dart Rounds that very rarely bounce
It is in effect in prototype stage if they are still so afraid to use them that they take t55 s out of storage rather than use them
The T-14 went from Final wooden Prototypes into Vaporware so the money assigned to this project could get into Zhoigu and Gerasimov pockets instead.......
The real question is where is T-15 IFV
@ms3862
10 ай бұрын
Lmao
Some of thoses T-54s are older than my mother. And she has a great grand kid!
Peskov recently claimed that no T14s had been destroyed in Ukraine. That invisibility shield on them seems to be working pretty good, I guess.
The T14s float offshore of Monaco :)
If they do reach the battlefield, they'll be easy to spot as they'll be the only tanks being towed by another tank.
@Ceece20
8 ай бұрын
Better hope the tank crews turn off the “emergency brake” first. Lol it still sounds so stupid that people believe a tank crew would be stupid and incompetent enough to hit the emergency brake while driving on a straight line in parade.
7:50 - well, except.... usually, 80's era weapons in some aspects are around top of what's possible (mechanics, materials) but only thing that had developed is ELECTRONICS and SOFTWARE. GMLRS is...well.... MLRS with cheap laser INS+GPS. It is actually very cost effective to take exiisting and proven frames and fit them with whole new capabilities.
The king of tank spotting from space returns
Its the same reason you don't see any Abrams and Challenger tanks field by the UAF right now: they're too valuable to be captured and it looks bad if they're destroyed. We all know now that any tank can be easily destroyed by artillery and drones so it's not really a priority to get the most high tech tank out onot the field. Its much more efficient for the factory to upgrade their current t72 and t90 tanks to modernized varients with better optics and systems.
It's easy to tell that they've not made it to the front line in Ukraine: none have been destroyed or even video'd. You can bet that every drone operator in Ukraine is desperate to be the first to set one of these alight, and any that got to the front would have been swarmed within the hour.
@demomanchaos
10 ай бұрын
Considering the BMP-T that was smoked the T-14 is not going anywhere near even the furthest limit of Ukrainian range.
Havent been able to make the drive from the factory to the area of operations.
In testing. There is 10-20 tanks out there which are in different states of modification
Such impressive work; detailed, documented proof and satellite imagery ordered to support the creators enquiry. It's easy to see why so many other YT creators refer to Covert Cabal for this type of data.
@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders
10 ай бұрын
lol, what documented proof? Where the quotes and/or references from qualified sources to the T-14 **actually** being used in Ukraine, where, what days, what locations, which units? There's a lot of conjecture and assumptions, but not much solid info.
@capncrispypoo9342
10 ай бұрын
@@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders...did you even WATCH the video? He specifically talks about how the T-14 is NOT in ukraine.
@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders
10 ай бұрын
@@capncrispypoo9342 5:07 *He* makes the statement, he doesn't attribute it to TASS. Have you *actually* watched the video?? If you decide to watch this video, keep an ear out for it from 5:00 onwards.
@capncrispypoo9342
10 ай бұрын
@@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders You're still on about this? You deleted your old comment saying the same thing to replace it with another saying the same exact thing but in a ruder way.
@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders
10 ай бұрын
@@capncrispypoo9342 Yeah. It didn't feel sufficiently sarcastic enough. I'm happier with the revision. It's important to have a zero tolerance with people who celebrate mediocrity like this video. This channel **could** be great if he didn't cut corners the way he has been over his last several videos. Also, it's infuriating listening to him mispronounce the word 'leopard'.
Along the same lines, I also wonder what happened to the Terminators. We saw 1 or 2 some time ago, but not recently.
@MeNamesPoshOpossum
10 ай бұрын
I have seen a video of one in a forest a few months ago, it was firing at some Ukrainian vehicles or something, that was the last time I saw it.
@user-me5oq3kl4h
10 ай бұрын
It’s up there
@bastiaan7777777
10 ай бұрын
There were only 20 or so terminators made (sofar), I think 13 or so were sold to Algeria, 10 in service of Russia.. +- a few. If they have those, they are rare.
@guywhodoesstuff3314
9 ай бұрын
We do know one was destroyed, but yeah not a lot has been seen of them.
Maybe the T-14 is the friends we made along the way
Those treads look mighty tasty. A tank that cannot move is a dead tank. Somebody has to get out and fix the track, unless half of the wheels have also been wrecked. All it can do at that point is wait for a Javelin or A-10. Oh, or a Reaper with the latest block of Hellfires.
Would it be possible to compare level of corruption between the way US and Russia procure new weapons? The amount both sides spend is very different. Both have some obvious issues. Audits made in Pentagon are already quite legendary. If you spend 800+ billions a year, things get lost but also done. Russia's defense spending is comparatively much smaller so things get lost and if the year is good, some troops actually get their daily meals.
@callsignapollo_
10 ай бұрын
The difference is in where the corruption lies In the US, its politicians getting paid by companies to advocate for their product to get the contract, or to order more of a system, all with the money flowing to the business first, after which the products actually get delivered, and then the politicians get more kickbacks. Projects may be cancelled or delayed due to reworks or setbacks, but the ordered inventory gets made and the check gets cashed. Soldiers are paid and treated well enough they dont have resort to stealing and selling equipment. Its also much harder to sell gear because the US is fairly strict in their tracking, plenty of stories of soldiers not being allowed to leave formations or training until missing gear is found. In the RUAF, its usually more that MOD orders something built, claim theyve built hundreds of them, take a couple pictures with VDV or other special forces equipped with the gear, and then maybe some of that gear actually makes it to the troops. company to battalion level thievery and selling of stockpiles with "generous" accounting is common, as is a culture that promotes stealing to survive because the average soldier's pay is abysmal. More often since stealing is a necessity, if you dont steal, you're looked at as suspicious to the average russian soldier. TL:DR in the US politicians get paid to make sure certain contracts win, but the equipment ends up with the troops, maintaining readiness for combat, and in RU the politicians order something made and things get stolen all along the chain of custody until there are barely scraps that actually make it to soldiers who never expected to actually see combat before their contracts expired
Catastrophic Cook Off is the best band name of the 21st century and I need someone who plays better than me to notice it
@michaeleastes1705
10 ай бұрын
As a 71 year old former tanker and novice bassist, I concur heartily.
And learning from destroyed or disabled Challenger 2’s which have inevitably been in action and been stopped by artillery, mines or anti tank weapons
@jamesjefferies3762
10 ай бұрын
Destroyed Challenger 2? When was that then?
@phlemtaco6623
10 ай бұрын
@@jamesjefferies3762he probably meant leopard 2