Hope you guys liked the video! I love using YouGov to make easy cash! Click my link: www.inflcr.co/SHHmk #YouGovPartner

@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617

Жыл бұрын

You think US surplus and stores are small what about Britain and Germany?! It’s insane. Less than 100 tanks that could be used at any one time.

@traveltheworld886

Жыл бұрын

*fewer

@markb8468

Жыл бұрын

Hey, glad to have you back. Thanks!

@Sajuuk

Жыл бұрын

I like your videos but the title to this one is a bit misleading and suggests that US tank stocks are depleting due to a decline in overall US capabilities, which I'm sure isn't the case. I know, titles can be tricky things, but that was my immediate impression of this title, at least.

@markb8468

Жыл бұрын

@@Sajuuk I would agree with that assessment.

As several people have already written: Poland: - production of 250 new M1A2SEPv3 + 43 specialized vehicles on A1 chassis - upgrade of 116 M1A1SA or M1A1FEP (ex US Marins) (for donation of UA 240 T-72M tanks) + 26 specialized vehicles on A1 chassis - The rental of 28 M1A2SEPv32 tanks for training purposes Australia (contract 2021/2022): - Purchase of 160 used M1A1s and upgrade in australia to 75 M1A2SEPv3 tanks and 46 specialized vehicles on A1 chassis (by Australian industry) Romania: - bought 54 tanks, but there are no details of what version and whether new or from stock.

@Admin-5

Жыл бұрын

I was just thinking about that during the video. I was mostly thinking about Poland buying a few hundred Abrams

@Matt-mt2vi

Жыл бұрын

Taiwan is also getting 108

@johnbooth3073

Жыл бұрын

Where are all of the old M60’s. There are hundreds in Turkey upgraded by the Israelis to 120mm canon plus upgraded fire control systems and armour packages ?

@VhenRaTheRaptor

Жыл бұрын

@@johnbooth3073 Retired in the 90s.

@czaja995

Жыл бұрын

small correction 28 rented for training to Poland are SEPv2

Could the decrease in tank stocks be due to prepositioning more units in Europe, implying the tanks are on the way to bases there?

@user-qf6yt3id3w

Жыл бұрын

It could be that the US believes war with Russia and or China is a possibility and is preparing to either fight or deter it.

@cloudpoint0

Жыл бұрын

The US recently sent around 30 tanks to Germany for training purposes (different tanks from the ones intended for Ukraine).

@shawnr771

Жыл бұрын

The prepositioned vehicles have been there for years. In 1990 our officers from Ft Polk were taken to France to inspect the 5thID prepositioned equipment. The tank reduction is probably due to additional sales other than Ukraine.

@adamalexander1496

Жыл бұрын

Yes, as well as older Abrams configurations being reoutfitted and upgraded with newer ones, which takes months to accomplish. Tanks are no longer what they were in the two world wars, where they were essentially just cars with heavy armor and a big gun, but are now very sophisticated and complex platforms. Platforms that take lots of time, and money.

@baronvonlimbourgh1716

Жыл бұрын

I'd expect new positional stocks to have been going to asia over europe. Europe isn't in any danger, what is russia gonna do? They won't make it 100km into poland before the russian army seizes to exist by just european airforces and millitaries. And then there are the americans stationed in europe as well with all their gear.

Russia has a LOT of tank hulls, the US has a lot of complete tanks. The US has a geographic advantage, when it stores tanks, it meticulously seals them and stores them in the desert. In Russia, they are left out in wet, cold conditions. Then factor in the grift of the Russian Army, all the parts that have been thieved. They went to T-62s very early in the war when on paper, they had thousands of T-72s in storage

@tetraxis3011

Жыл бұрын

You have ignored ALOT of detail s and mentioned some flat out lies. The T62s are only for the Donbas Militias. And no, the tanks stored haven’t gotten all their pieces stolen. Russian tanks also are surprisingly able to withstand the cold harsh Siberian conditions very well. They are barely rusted at all.

@DutchFR1908

Жыл бұрын

and still united states only send 31 tanks ( will send ) and ofcourse america pays the most military support but the eu pays even more only its mmostly humanitarian or cash for social security in ukraine so end of the day we pay in europe as much as united states but why the us isnt sending tanks long range rockets and fighter jets i dont understand and its not good. my point we can't rule out russia because they are going for it for 100 percent while nato is doing like 5 percent just to keep it going

@luigimrlgaming9484

Жыл бұрын

@@tetraxis3011 probably because they were designed to.

@ehsnils

Жыл бұрын

@@tetraxis3011 I do agree that storing in Siberia makes sense, but the fact that it's T62s that are put into service instead of T72s is indicating that there aren't any viable T72s anymore and even T54 and T55 tanks are put into service so this tells me that the amount of usable tanks that Russia has is coming to an end. There are probably a few usable T72s still around, but not enough to make any difference.

@Br1cht

Жыл бұрын

That´s cope dude, don´t buy to much into either side propaganda since *both* lie.

Great part of "missing" 300 tanks is that at least 116 of them are going to Poland on top of 250 more "new" tanks. That may be the case. It quite cover the missing tanks. I can be ofcourse totally wrong, but as you said, US takes stored tanks and refurbishes and upgrades them, resets their milleage and sell to costumers. Poland has signed a contract of total of 366 M1s. 116 M1A1FEP (if i recall correctly) and 250 M1A2 SEPv3

@richardthomson4693

Жыл бұрын

if rumors are going to be believed the tanks that are going to be sent to ukraine will be some / all of the 50 M1A1 SA with tungsten inserts currently in service with Australia army. Australia has a SEPv3's on order, there will be a joint announcement last week of may according to some media sources

@bornonthebattlefront4883

Жыл бұрын

“General Dynamics no longer builds the M1 from scratch, but has a number of “M1 seed vehicles” that are bare-bone tanks. When new orders come in, General Dynamics modifies these seed vehicles with new technology depending on which variant is selected.” Idk, but it would be odd to me that the US would count these “seed” tanks as “capable MBT’s” They can only produce 12 a month Doubt that the 250 “new” tanks are part of the “missing 300” The 116 definitely do though

@jakubw.2779

Жыл бұрын

@@bornonthebattlefront4883 like i said i could be totally wrong. I don't know how GDLS builds new tanks, if they indeed have some spare hulls or od they take those tanks from storage. However quite a number of clients ordered M1s recently and i doubt GDLS have this many spare hulls.

@swj719

Жыл бұрын

I also wonder how many of the "missing" tanks are just aging out and are getting stripped down for usable spare parts. Yeah, that engine or transmission isn't as good as new built or old unused stock, but probably better than a part that's been burned out.

@bear76009

Жыл бұрын

@@swj719 everything like that in the tanks are in packs easy to swap in and out in a facility built to maintain them. In the field? yea that gets a bit more difficult

Correction: The US is still actively building new Abrams tanks, the Lima Army Tank Plant in Lima, Ohio- is currently running minimum production of 11 new Abrams tanks per month. This is on top of the upgrade and maintenance programs that already happen there.

@bornonthebattlefront4883

Жыл бұрын

“General Dynamics no longer builds the M1 from scratch, but has a number of “M1 seed vehicles” that are bare-bone tanks. When new orders come in, General Dynamics modifies these seed vehicles with new technology depending on which variant is selected.”

@gaptaxi

Жыл бұрын

@@bornonthebattlefront4883 But Egypt does.

@jgw9990

Жыл бұрын

​@@bornonthebattlefront4883 Sounds clever to me. The navy should do that with ship hulls

@neurofiedyamato8763

Жыл бұрын

​@@jgw9990 The navy did with a number of old WW2 ships. But unlike tanks, modifying ships can be as if not more expensive than a new ship. So it depends a lot more on the individual ships and how much of an upgrade it can fit.

@victorzvyagintsev1325

Жыл бұрын

7 years ago Lima was down to a skeleton workforce of something like 300 people. 5 years ago it was 600. Given this fact, i very much doubt it can handle a brand new tank production of even 1 tank a month(the rate at which Ukraine produced its own brad new tanks). 11 tanks sounds more like what Russians are doing with the T-72B3.

The US is also sending “old” Abrams to Poland but they are going to be replaced by new built ones

@yoloman3607

Жыл бұрын

Nations send old available tanks to Ukraine with the promise of Abrams replacements down the line for their trouble. God deal for everyone.

@CRAZYHORSE19682003

Жыл бұрын

The "Old" tanks being sent are first sent to the tank plant at Lima, OH. They are stripped down and brought up to the mose advanced standard. When they leave they are in effect new build tanks.

@albertkowalski5629

Жыл бұрын

Not sending but selling. Poland bought 250 new SEPv3 tanks and 116 older M1A1 FEP Abrams. There are plans to upgrade these 116 M1A1 to SEPv3 standard.

@Alexander-cg1ey

Жыл бұрын

​@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 that's really not true

@Amann0407

Жыл бұрын

The US doesn't have new build tanks, all hulls are from ppre 1992. BUT, what Lima does is refurbish old hulls to modern standards, rips out the DU and sells to allies or keeps armor package and gives to US to replace older models The US built so many M1 Abrams (120 a month!) that it doesn't need new tanks, just to keep them upgraded

Another way to look at this is to ask how many tanks does the US need? Since Ukraine has the ability to strike a significant blow to the only country the US would engage in a tank battle requiring thousands of tanks, I would say that they can afford to supply far more than the promised 34 tanks they have earmarked for a fall delivery. Considering the thousands that are in storage and waiting to be converted, I would say that we can afford to get tanks to Ukraine immediately, so long as Ukraine has been trained with the vehicles and have the ability to supply and maintain them.

@mill2712

Жыл бұрын

From a higher comment, someone pointed out that Abrams are logistical monsters to keep up to their optimal performance. They're very maintenance heavy, they need to be modified for the Ukrainian environment, they need to take out some technology that they don't want the Russians possibly getting their hands on, and though it can run on many types of fuel; a special jet/diesel blend is most optimal for peak performance. Not to mention they're gas guzzlers.

@michaelthayer5351

Жыл бұрын

There's no good answer for how many tanks the US needs as we don't know how many the US would lose in a contingency in the Korean Peninsula, or resupply for Taiwan, or just a general war with China in Asia, which while it would be mostly a Naval and Air war would probably still require a sizeable commitment of ground troops with their tanks. Generally a stockpile is supposed to last however long you think it'll take war production to catch up with battlefield losses. The US might only lose half as many tanks in a year as Russia did in Ukraine, but that would still stretch the current stockpile uncomfortably thin for the Pentagon planners.

@avisitorhere

Жыл бұрын

@@michaelthayer5351 Thousands of tanks for mountainous Korea? I don't think so. The big open plains of Ukraine, Poland and western Russia is why we built 10,000 Abrams.

@avisitorhere

Жыл бұрын

@@mill2712 True, then we should be having a conversation in congress of why we are supporting these complex vehicles that are so difficult to supply and maintain that our allies can't or don't want to use them.

@Nokamigg

Жыл бұрын

@@mill2712 Those Abrams are simply outdated, not in terms of weaponry but more so in terms of survivability AND fuel consumption. I highly doubt we will see Abrams used really successfully in Ukraine either way. Tanks also have a very strange position in modern war, they are needed for occupation but are very much a death trap. And well... if they take until the end of the year to arrive there they are probably also too late. If anything this war showed us, a massive tank force is not automatically a win anymore. It's all about drones, missiles and air force. The Abrams will fail the same way the russian tanks failed, if not even more miserably.

No, thank you! Never feel like you need to apologise for not providing content when you've had things going on. Your stuff is always worth the wait.

@fakecubed

Жыл бұрын

Better quality than quantity.

The US owns thousands of M1 tanks in excess of requirements. And the US tank plant continues to produce new M1 tanks. The Lima OH tank plant must be kept open and staffed because it would take years to put the pieces and staff back together. So we build new M1 and variants for customer requirements.

@bornonthebattlefront4883

Жыл бұрын

“General Dynamics no longer builds the M1 from scratch, but has a number of “M1 seed vehicles” that are bare-bone tanks. When new orders come in, General Dynamics modifies these seed vehicles with new technology depending on which variant is selected.”

@grahamelliott9506

Жыл бұрын

ultimately, sending our tanks to our allies serves a deterrent purpose - here in the americas they really aren't doing much, and the future conflicts the US needs to prepare for are going to be air and sea... our allies will hold the ground while we back them up so the best home for our tanks is actually not at home at all ; they aren't deterring much in this hemisphere ... but sending them to poland or HIMARS to japan or even subs for australia? that serves a security purpose, that adds to deterrence

@termitreter6545

Жыл бұрын

@@bornonthebattlefront4883 Yeah, just some random quote that doesnt say much. Questoin is, can they still build new Abrams from scratch, and how many facilities do they have that can do so. IIRC Leo2s are even being built currently, since the storage has basically been used up.

Every video upload by Covert Cabal is like Christmas for me ❤

160 of the tanks hull’s were purchased by Australia, for 120 SEV.3 conversion, 40 for future if required. They supposedly to be delivered in 2024.

The US has over 2000 M1 tanks in storage. They are all upgradeable to the latest M1A2 Sep 3 variant. Also, keep in mind the Russian tanks that are left over in storage are mostly inoperable. We actually store our armor properly. Most of the Russian tanks are also older T55, T62 and early T72's. The reason why the numbers are changing is because a lot of the armor is being upgraded to M1A2 Sep 3 variant.

@loganskiwyse7823

7 ай бұрын

We actually have nearly 3, 500 in storage excluding the handful sent to Ukraine.

Those sites during my time at the Fulda gap they were called POMCUS. Lost track of what was going on with those sites after the Cold War ended and the US drew down to a fraction of it size in Germany. Every REFORGER the deployed units would collect weapons and equipment from POMCUS to use for the annual nato training.

@Walterwaltraud

Жыл бұрын

the only brigade size (iirc) depot still in use is Mannheim. Ben Hodges made sure that one stayed active and stocked after the 2014 invasion (again, iirc).

I work at a X US Port that moves Army Tanks out of the country I can confirm there's about 400 tanks both m1s and Bradley's sitting there as we speak all functional heading overseas. We have been moving these for months now I've seen nearly 800 in the last 6 months.

@mikedrop4421

Жыл бұрын

I'd bet a dollar they are part of the "military reorganization" going on within NATO just in case Putin goes full Austrian painter mode.

@johnnykrauze

10 ай бұрын

That is a lot of tanks.

You provide great videos that are appreciated by the masses. I'm glad you're back and hope you're rested and in good spirits! This is another fabulous update!

Great video! I have to say though America has modern tanks. You don’t see M60s or M48s as you see T62s T64s. The marines have go rid of their tanks so I’m guessing they went to storage? I know they were m1a1’s but like you said could be upgraded. Hope you are ok with your personal stuff. We love the videos but take all the time you need man!

@randallturner9094

Жыл бұрын

The Marines’ M1A1s were sent to Poland. Poles are using them for training & familiarization until they get their M1A2SEPv3’s.

@EatMyShortsAU

Жыл бұрын

Yeah they will not have M60s and M48s but some of the older Abrams in storage like the M1s are literally 40 years old. Having said that the most modern ABRAMS like the M1A2 SEP versions seem pretty advance.

@randallturner9094

Жыл бұрын

@@EatMyShortsAU they don’t send the tanks directly from storage, they refurbish them first. They have no choice but to modernize the tanks, the older versions are no longer supported. All their internals are out of date.

@EatMyShortsAU

Жыл бұрын

@@randallturner9094 True but it looks Ukraine will only receive M1A1s and leopard 1's I think those are basically second tier tanks. Basically second and third generation tanks. In which is probably not ideal but EU countries and the US can probably send a lot more of them as they in storage(after they are refurbished and operable first).

@Kristof1

Жыл бұрын

​@@EatMyShortsAUthere are Leopards 2 already in Ukraine

Love your content, incredible depth in both knowledge and info given, I look forward to each n every video and hope all is well behind the scenes too 😊

watched the vid, I am pretty sure the missing tanks have simply been moved to Europe, or maybe some are the ones that were sold to Poland.

Some of the missing tanks might be part of the 116 ex marine abrams bought by Poland? btw thanks for making such great videos!

@n3v3rforgott3n9

Жыл бұрын

they arent sending poland us stock but export variants

My understanding is that the U.S. does not make a single NEW tank. Even for foreign sales, all new Abrams that roll out are just updated and refurbished models. So I think the drop in storage numbers is the sales we've been making to other countries like Poland.

@baronvonlimbourgh1716

Жыл бұрын

I heard a while ago that the usa was still building abrams and putting them straight to storage because just building the minimum every year would be cheaper then losing the capability and logistics and having to rebuild that from scratch again when a new model is eventually gonna replace abrams. It probably could be the continual updating, but i really think they where talking about brand new ones.

@jonny-b4954

Жыл бұрын

​@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 I'm not sure if they're qctually building new ones. Army kept the manufacturing plant open by buying more for years after they had no need but I think they just refurbish nowadays

@Stlaind

Жыл бұрын

The thing about that is that while there are new tanks being built, they aren't built entirely new, but use the hulls from stores older tanks. If you look at the orders from other nations for Abrams tanks it is entirely reasonable for a lot of the change in stores tanks to be entirely for that.

@blueskiestrevor5200

Жыл бұрын

Yeah they kept the plant open by "building" new ones. Really they are just rebuilding old ones. I actually agree with the logic of keeping the plant open because I'm sure it means we could build brand tanks if needed. But for now it's cheaper and easier to simply draw old tanks from storage and remake them.

@randallturner9094

Жыл бұрын

Yep, all “new” tanks are refits. But they’re just as good as actual new tanks. For the most part they really ARE new, like y’all say, they strip it down to the chassis. (Torsion bar suspension doesn’t wear out.) Don’t stress, it’s got that “new tank smell”. 😛

I just wanted to say thank you. I love your videos and really admire how well made and narrated they are. Don't worry about the delays, life has a habit of getting in the way. We are just grateful for them when they come.

Another great video, CC. I really enjoy them. Hope everything is going well for you.

I always love your videos mate. You sum your stories up in easy-to-understand sound bites with appropriate video file, but I think your x factor is using the satellite imagery to explain your theories as well. I've learned so much from your videos. Thanks for what you do, and take care of yourself! Cheers!

From my understanding is there are over a total of 5,000 tanks. Now 2,000 are in storage the others are at bases FOBs, and other such places around the world. American tanks are regularly updated. If you know the motor heads in the repair areas they do earn there money when spending it on Repair Upgrades and to be maintained on a yearly basis. Just from what my buddies tell me from there Mech time.

For what it's worth, your videos are exactly what the wider media ecosystem needs - proper investigative journalism. I hope you go from strength to strength mate

Great to have you back. Wishing you well through your turbulence!

Interesting stuff and a true addition to the more ‘daily battlefield news’ videos posted daily. Keep it up! 👍

Always appreciate your videos. Also, I think we all understand having to take time away for personal reasons. Anyway, very insightful video as always.

Oh Cabal dude thank you for the content, glad you are smart & taking time away from producing videos for us & focusing on important shit. You have your own style & have an objective & open view of the world. Your videos are worth it.

Thanks for making these videos! They are if great quality and I look forward to new ones when I see them

hey man, glad your back and I look forward to more great content. Thank you

I appreciate your efforts, it's not lost on me, I'm turbo busy breeding ragdoll kittens and couldn't dream of having time to dig as deep as you do, thanks again!!

Love your content. Please don't keep us waiting 4 weeks for another vid. Hope you're well.

Always great content. Hope things are looking up on the personal level. 👍

Thanks for all of the work that goes into making these videos.

I don't always agree with you but great video. You should also keep in mine we build about 15 new Abrams from scratch a month with a surge potential of 30 a month. And that's without expanding the workforce to build even more. Max would probably be around 50 a month.

@jimmiller5600

Жыл бұрын

So you're saying both Plant One Hull and Turret fab lines (including Flame-cut) are still in operation in Lima?

Sierra Army Depot is down to about half the number of M1 Abrams that used to be there. Most of those tanks have only been there less than 5 years though, so I would imagine most of those are still in pretty decent shape. The tanks in Anniston would be in the process of being upgraded since that what they go there for. Those are only two places that you would find M1s. You left out Ft Knox, Ft Hood, Ft Irwin and Ft Polk.

@josephahner3031

Жыл бұрын

He's not counting active service vehicles.

@orangephoenixbrazier4978

Жыл бұрын

You'd end up with a decently-sized comment thread if you actually listed all the places Abrams are kept.

@johndillard8588

Жыл бұрын

Camp Shelby, MS.

I really appreciate the high quality content you put out! It's a great watch and really entertaining!

Nice to see you back. Hope you’re taking it steady 👌

You are digging your "tank nerd" rabbit hole deeper and deeper lol Jokes aside appreciate your wel researched content as always

Great work as always. I will say - the point of the reserves includes a potential war against Russia. So drawing down those reserves to send to Ukraine does not interfere with US war readiness. The US should send hundreds more Abrams and Bradley's and assist Ukraine to end the war this year or at the latest next summer. Holding onto pre-war reserves is just hoarding.

Sorry for the personal issues you've beon going through. I appreciate you and your videos!

Def one of my favorite channels on YT, good to see youre back at it.

Do a video on how many OLD tanks Russia has(T-34s, T-44s, IS-3s, T-10s, and other misc old vehicles), both in deep storage and in good condition in museums.

@bussolini6307

Жыл бұрын

there is not such tanks in russian inventory, last WW2ish tank seens in a combat zone in eastern europe was the IS-3(didn't even saw combat because of the lack of ammo) in the donbass conflict.

@ex0ghost837

Жыл бұрын

nope, there are only T64s and as old as T62s

@kalkuttadrop6371

Жыл бұрын

@@bussolini6307 I have heard of IS-3s and T-10s in deep storage, not to mention plenty of T-34s in museums

@kalkuttadrop6371

Жыл бұрын

@@ex0ghost837 We literally know that's wrong we've seen T-54s

@seeleagent

Жыл бұрын

@@kalkuttadrop6371 we’ve seen pictures of T55s being moved around, but not in combat. They also wouldn’t be acting in a tank role, but in a fire support one. That’s what they’ve been used for in the Middle East for decades now.

Some big differences between US and Russian tanks. Abrams will always lose Turret Toss competition. Abrams, if hit and knocked out of action has a far better chance of being repaired, whereas the T-tank has a higher chance of becoming scrap metal. The two wars in Iraq should tell you something. Off hand, I would say that 1 battalion of M1's is probably worth 10 battalions of Russian tanks. The coming battles with Western vs Russian tanks in the next few months should be enlightening.

@simonm1447

Жыл бұрын

The German cat is already hungry and it loves orcs for breakfast

@termitreter6545

Жыл бұрын

Abrams got the best crew survivability, but even a Leo 2 has at least 15 shots safe in turret, and the rest in one box. Tank can be much easier repaired in case of battle damage. Compared, a T-72 has 22 shots in its (exposed) carroussel. All of the other munition is stored in the living area, the commander literally sits on a explosive charge. Doctrine for Soviets was, make the tank as small (and cheap) as possible, avoid getting hits, and bad repairability doesnt matter if you got enough tanks to overwhelm the enemy in the first place. A bit cynical and inhumane, but maybe alright for WW3. Poor design in any smaller conflict.

@simonm1447

Жыл бұрын

@@termitreter6545 a life was never worth much in the Soviet Union, and this hasn't changed in russia until today

Love your vids, thanks and best wishes to you.

Excellent video! Thanks for this.

America has less numbers but more modern tanks.

@manupupule

Жыл бұрын

Fun fact: America can win a war without using a single tank

@manofsteel8728

Жыл бұрын

​@@manupupulelike Afghanistan and Vietnam

@Chopstorm.

Жыл бұрын

​@@manofsteel8728 Vietnam was absolutely a success. It denied the Soviets a major strategic asset. You also forget that the US was not the only power at play in either of those conflicts. The Aussies, Brits, Germans, etc. all participated in one or both of those conflicts.

@goran8965

Жыл бұрын

In big war's numbers matter not how much it is technology superior

@daithi6826

Жыл бұрын

@@Chopstorm. Vietnam is undoubtedly a resounding defeat. US prestige shattered, and Vietnam and it’s surrounding countries turned communist. Not to mention the horrific death toll. Over 2 million dead and for what? If you are against russia invading ukraine you should be against the Vietnam war.

Hmm I wonder is some are making an unannounced vacation to a certain Eastern European countrie…

@Poo_Brain_Horse

Жыл бұрын

I sure hope so!

@VanquishMediaDE

Жыл бұрын

I am sure, but the reality of it is the U.S. Military is more obsessed with DIEversity. I was in the Army from 2015-2018, deployed once to Iraq and once to Syria in support of OIR, the armed forces are a complete joke now.

@Poo_Brain_Horse

Жыл бұрын

@@VanquishMediaDE Shit man did Putin himself pay you to say that trash. The US has absolutely dominated in every single conventional fight it has ever been in. Its only real weakness has been against guerilla fighters and even then they "lost" due to lack of popular support, not because they were ever straight up militarily defeated. If the US decided it wanted Russia out of Ukraine, it would happen tomorrow. Russia is lucky the West has been so restrained.

Excellent video, thank you for making it!

Good to have you back mate. Really appreciate the effort on another great video 😊

Was a 19k m1 abrams tanker, our tanks during 16-19 in 2nd bde 1st AD were old beat up m1a2 sep v2's that hadnt been reset in over a decade. They were always breaking down, and it was not unusual to have deadlined tanks not operating for over a year. I would say most of the stored m1a1/ m1p tanks at the Sierra army depot have been stripped of valuable parts, electronics, and are just empty tanks.

@macarmalite8775

Жыл бұрын

Same experience when I was in, they will get eaten up in Ukraine.

@smokeypuppy417

Жыл бұрын

@@macarmalite8775 not necessarily, when they worked, had a good boresight, there a killing machine. But my brigades tanks were always falling apart. After a 2-3 week exercise, you could expect only half strength of tanks running.

Tanks are this generation's battleship; they're soon to be replaced by a more capable and flexible combat system.

@dannylo5875

Жыл бұрын

Hoover tanks.

@TheRezro

Жыл бұрын

They were saying that from 60's. Problem is not the tank, but the Russian mentality.

Great content as usual. Thank you!

😻Thanks taking the time to post and quality stuff as always 💪

America should send more tanks.

@nobodyherepal3292

Жыл бұрын

Yes

Thanks for your looking into things. The logistical support in having replacement parts and such is just has important.

Excellent work, as always. Thanks.

Great research.

Always excited to see another covert cabal video

Thank you for all the videos! Always a highlight of my weekend to see what you are putting out!

Always joyful to see you posted a video!

Good stuff, keep it up Man

Really enjoy your videos - very interesting.

Thank you, always great insights into logistics

Great channel, man. Keep up the good work!

Thanks for going over what we have! And your most welcome I really apcate your content!

The USA has between 5500 and 9000 Abrams from the sources I have found. The 5500 are newer models while the rest are Gulf War versions in storage, but complete.

Great video as always!

Glad to have you back on KZread

Great video as usual and hope whatever is going on behind the scenes is ok.

Welcome back. Good job as always.

Thanks for your work brother

Thank you for everything. Your videos are always super interesting.

Keep up your good work always interesting

Thanks for the video.

Missed ya bro hope all is well ❤ we are glad to see your hardworking still and came back

This was a fun video. Thanks

Glad you're back!

Awesome video !!!!! James.

Keep the good work going my friend

Really good vid!

Do all major NATO countries ! France,Germany,Poland,Romania etc. More info from satellite as this videos are INSANELY informational and entertaining.

Excellent vid👍

Keep up the good work my friend. I look forward to new videos

Thank you and everyone else in the OSINT community worldwide for your hard work! ❤

This took a ton of effort. Came out great!

@Covert Cabal , I appreciate you and the fact that you are alive. Stay frosty and be proud to be so influential/trusted. I envy and idolize your service to humanity through this channel. Honour is yours, almighty brother.

excellent stuff, one of my best channels

Legend dude, love the content

Take care of yourself. Thanks for the videos. I look forward to them.

The main reason why the number of US tanks is permanently dropping down are not the tanks to be delivered to Ukraine (31 as you said). Its the fact the US has to deliver 116 pcs M1A1 and 278 M1A2 to Poland. Its a replacement of the their delivery of about 300 T-72 and around 90 PT-91 tanks to Ukraine. That`s the reason! But as usual...very nice and high quality report! Well done!!

Thank you for providing a unique perspective. 😎

Thanks mate, hadn't seen anywhere else that the US was going to supply reserve tanks after all, so the Abrahms might actually make a difference this year as opposed to next!

Thank you for the content you generate whether or not it's weekly or longer.

love your videos

Really appreciate your efforts on these videos. I’ve seen others reference your Russian tank figures so it’s valuable info.

Great video and analysis...no rust buckets here with the US inventory...either move, convert, sell or scrap...

just the channel I was looking for