I love all your videos thank you , keep up the good work.

Like the time Prince Nonce turned up.

Thank you.

Very good

3:55 when you begin to regret last night's mutton vindaloo and Guinness

1:38 anyone else recognize the music from Oversimplified?

Published on Coronation Day at the exact moment the crown is placed on the head😂 What are you lot up to now?

@julianshepherd2038

Жыл бұрын

Algorithm

@Eti2d1

Жыл бұрын

I actually clicked on this video thinking that the ongoing coronation is going wrong 😂 Btw., I'm not subscribed to this channel. It was recommended by KZread

(Mis)hearing the roars of acclaim from inside the abbey, the guards outside feared "something was kicking off at the coronation." _So they set all the surrounding buildings on fire._ *What?*

It wasn't given back 1996. English. It was righteously taken back by young Scottish men.

the "earliest coronation in England" was in Dalriada?! come on @historyhit... that's modern day Scotland. Please.

tease!!!

00:44 1600s??? this is embarrassing

Well technically they'd didn't set fire to London

Not fair to ask Americans, however they didn't do too badly !

'When a new King comes into power' Despite all the circus and costume, we all still know the country is ruled. It's never been governed.

This is good, but I can't watch the whole of it since I cannot afford to join you - pity.

You have to dig deep to learn about our toxic past because we didn't get taught about it at school.

@MrAdrianOldfield

Жыл бұрын

Mug

@HD-ol1mc

Жыл бұрын

You hardly have to dig deep. Just pick up a book!

@AllIsWellaus

Жыл бұрын

I hear you. Try being welsh. :)

@maxpowers9129

7 ай бұрын

The internet puts most of human knowledge at our fingertips. You don't need to dig deep for that information.

@drkmtter7860

7 ай бұрын

@@maxpowers9129 aye if you believe what everything Google tells you

The coronation was much more boring than I was expecting.

Please! Let's not have that today (Coronation of the Turd day). I think someone cutting the phallus into the grass was a nice enough touch.

Yet again, twisting history and making one thing be about another.

I think maybe mayyybe it can be argued that the idea of king/queen works to the advantage of a nation when the nation is about the size of a county or smaller and there are several other kings/queen's dispersed throughout the region that will challenge each other if they get grandiose ideas about taking mono (monarchic) power. There was a time this happened everywhere including UK. Still happens in countries with small tribal communities. When a kingdom changes to an empire and then the empire collapses, it's time to wipe the slate clean and start again. How the British monarchy has managed to cling on is through the most false, deceptive, duplicitous, conniving tactics. Everything they do is an act by their own admission. They don't hide it. It's really is a corporation exempt from taxes and benefits paid for by the public and as long as the public choose to buy into the act then they are responsible for its existence. Pretty much every other country in the world has figured it out and gotten rid but the UK is buried deep in denial. clinging to a fairytale. It's not healthy. You can argue that they give to charities etc but so do all corporations. They meet their quota. The only difference is they're not investing their own money they're investing the general publics. Charles isn't our king because he's not really a king. We haven't had one of them in the UK for some time. He's playing a king. If the UK wants to establish a positive national identity it needs to get real, take accountability for harming other nations during the empire, not excuse it because it happened. Other empires have done it before, it's been done here, it happens throughout history, but yes it happened here and it wasn't good. We need to acknowledge and start fresh coming from a place of building itself up not knocking others down to feel good. Otherwise I believe we are heading in the same direction that Germany was last century, and that's a bad thing.

"When a new king comes in to power?". As Britain is coming off the heels of a 70 year long reign by Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II. JFC. And as if Victoria and Elizabeth I and Mary I didn't even exist. How embarrassing.

@danielpatrick3362

Жыл бұрын

Until very recently male heirs were given priority. He's talking about monarchs of centuries gone by. The documentary is not playing down the role of our far more recent in comparison queen's. Wake up and stop being ridiculous.

@carag2567

Жыл бұрын

@@danielpatrick3362 Hi. Thanks for your condescending reply. I was quoting one of the people who was interviewed for the presentation, not the presentation itself. That's why I used quotation marks. By definition, a coronation is the ceremony that signifies the official transfer of power from one legitimate monarch to the next, no matter their gender. And on occasion, to crown their consort. I was simply pointing out that patriarchy is still deeply embedded in some people's minds with the immediate use of the word "king" instead of "monarch" when the better part of the 19th, 20th, and early 21st centuries of British history were ruled by legitimate queens. Is that ridiculous to you?

@andrewstevenson118

Жыл бұрын

@@carag2567 Good call.

TO MANY ADVERTS!!!

Not my King my oath died with the Queen ❤

@doctorbastard2912

Жыл бұрын

Thank god for that, thanks for taking the time to share that with us Mr Dutch sounding name

Don't tease us with false hope something interesting might break out.

@HistoryHit

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

@andrewstevenson118

Жыл бұрын

Check out what happened at William the Conqueror's coronation. 🤐

@mbgal7758

Жыл бұрын

@@andrewstevenson118 do you consider that more or less disastrous than his funeral? 😂

@andrewstevenson118

Жыл бұрын

@@mbgal7758 Yeah, well, that's a really good point. I had forgotten about that.

This could be more Anglo-centric, but not by much.

@bartholomewesperanza3442

Жыл бұрын

No shit it’s a documentary about early Medieval English coronations. Idk what else you would expect.

@inqy8339

Жыл бұрын

I mean, yes? It's the literal crowning of an English king. (Though yeah, you could totally do a similar awesome video on Scottish kings.)

@cleverusername9369

Жыл бұрын

"This documentary about the inauguration of American presidents is too America-centric!" That's how you sound.

@Calum_S

Жыл бұрын

@@inqy8339 last time I looked Charles wasn't just being crowned as King of England.

@Calum_S

Жыл бұрын

@@bartholomewesperanza3442 maybe some more reference as to what other parts of the UK contribute towards make-up the service?

So the King should be elected then ! its about time every child had the chance to become the head of state .

@MrAdrianOldfield

Жыл бұрын

You’re not the smartest are you

@rockmusicman21

Жыл бұрын

Wouldn't really be a monarchy if they were elected now would it

You missed out the early King's of Scotland which was a Kingdom long before the Anglo Saxon (Germans) arrived. William the conqueror 1066 is not an Anglo Saxon he is a Viking

@skycloud4802

Жыл бұрын

William the Conqueror is considered Norman wasn't he? Although I think the Norman's may of been former Vikings.

@smguk2412

Жыл бұрын

Wrong Scotland came about in 843 and at that point the Saxons were already here for 433 years

@jameskitching6187

Жыл бұрын

Obviously WTC wasn’t an AS considering he defeated the AS’. As for whether the AS were British or not, that logic kinda suggests that nobody is British, as at some point everyone came from somewhere.

@meinich5488

Жыл бұрын

There was no Germany or Denmark at this time.

Muppets