*Harry Cliff* is great, please record new videos with him. Thank you so much *RI*

We are so pleased and honoured to have been able to launch our friend Harry Cliff's new book in our newly reopened lecture theatre!

@harshadadagale4253

2 жыл бұрын

Is there any way I can know when was this lecture was conducted, I read the description but there was no clue about it.

@Ni999

2 жыл бұрын

@@harshadadagale4253 Recorded 10 August 2021, now in the description.

@Ni999

2 жыл бұрын

So happy to see the lecture hall again!

@harshadadagale4253

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ni999 thanks

@ableone7855

2 жыл бұрын

Harry Cliff is one of the best lecturers you host at the Royal Institute. Smart, humorous and a very good scientist. Great style and presentation. Have him back soon, please.

Harry Cliff is such a fantastic lecturer! The way he talks and keep the attention of the audience is amazing to watch.

@nenmaster5218

2 жыл бұрын

Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment that the Learning never ends, right? Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

@Danoz_die_wreckt

11 ай бұрын

He’s easy to listen to.

One of the best communicators in science. Thank you!

Apple pie recipe: Warm oven to 10^15 degrees add well ripened matter bake for 9.3 billion years remove from oven allow to cool for 4.5 billion years then serve.

How to make an apple pie from scratch: First make a universe.

@qaziharoon1835

Жыл бұрын

Invent

Keep the Harry Cliff content coming please thanks 🙂

Harry Cliff has become one of my favorite presenters. Thank you for all the presentations on this wonderful site. First class!

I had an emotional reaction when I finally understood the concept of quantum fields during this video. I had to remove my glasses from my face and cat from my lap and just absorb this for a long moment.

@MarthaWhiteMouse

Жыл бұрын

omg same here!!!

what a lecture, what a lecture. An hour well spent.

LOVE YOUR SHOW. GREAT SUBJECT. I saw your show concerning Particle fields, fantastic. Thank you.

Another Harry Cliff lecture, finally!! Live as well wow what a treat

"The Cosmos is within us. We are made of star stuff. Star stuff contemplating the stars" - Carl Sagan

@super_ficial

2 жыл бұрын

A universe being created is not only redundant it is deliberately misleading. There is only Creation.

@aurelienyonrac

2 жыл бұрын

Are you a body, or do you have a body? You are unfathomable. (Can't measure)

@super_ficial

2 жыл бұрын

@@aurelienyonrac My ego tells me that I am a body, but I know better. I've seen four primary color and I've been aloft of my, 'Made the the USA' ephemeral body. I'm looking forwards to giving up this Ghost. (You sure know the right questions to ask). God bless and stand tall.

@lancenowlin1571

2 жыл бұрын

P

what an incredible amount of information must there be in those strange fields. just wow.

Great presentation by the lecturer. Look forward to more presentations by this presenter,

I was between this lecture and “how to make a cliff” by Harry Universe. I’m glad I chose this one

@trupyrodice4462

2 жыл бұрын

Lol, excellent. I wonder tho, what instruments, maths, and techniques were used to predict and detect the particles in a Cliff that Dr. Universe utilized compile his book. I suppose we just have to watch that lecture as well. Cheers

The best part of his lecture are he tells Stories and connects almost every beats of physics

Amazing job to share this incredible knowledge with all of us and to make it digestible for people like me who have little understanding of this highly advanced field of sience.

Excellent presentation. Thanks for providing it.

I watch his videos on my 81" TV, and it looks awesome! Thank you very much for breaking it down for regular people like me and my family. We are fascinated with his brilliant presenta, and we're learning a lot from you Mr Harry....

Amazing! I'm an engineering student but physics never fails to fascinate me. Solace at it's best!

This lecture is solid gold! Thanks. I don't know the details of this but it seems a crying shame that the lecture hall seems about only half full.

Thank you very much, that was a very enjoyable lecture.

Really great accessible explanation of complex matter with great enthusiasm!

A very interesting talk. I think Democritus is judged a bit harshly since the man lived 2500 years ago. Very little of his atomic hypothesis has survived to be seriously assessed, but as with many ancient Greek philosophers whose admirable speculations on the natural world certainly marks the beginning of humankind’s enquiry, it is not so much what they achieved but what they attempted. If anything, successors to these early speculators are far more guilty for not taking up and developing the more promising of these early ideas. The Atomic hypothesis of Democritus is reportedly a very small part of his total output, which also included contributions in mathematics, ethics, politics, biology, cosmology etc. In any-case, it was 2000 years later before any real scientific process was made. Give him his due! This is not to take away any credit from John Dalton’s great contribution to chemistry.

@Dan-zq5wt

Жыл бұрын

I had the same immediate reaction! I thought that was an unfair comment. Democritus was probably a genius. However, I do like this speaker!

@karthikshiva9801

Жыл бұрын

Taking nothing away from Democritus and his fellow Greek philosophers, it's a bit of a strech to claim that their thoughts & speculations marks humankind's enquiry 😂😂 Lot of other cultures including some from the cradle itself started this exploration from way before

@andreasgeorgiou5276

Жыл бұрын

@@karthikshiva9801 No doubt other cultures contributed to human knowledge, much lost to history. It is open to question, but it is generally accepted that this period in Greece marks the most important development in human enquiry.

@candidobertetti27

Жыл бұрын

It's fascinating how even the smartest people are overwhelmed by their national pride. He had to dismiss Democritus as a mere windbag and replace him by Englishman John Dalton, who lived more than two thousand years later. Amazing.

I remember watching the Higgs announcement live. I was amazed at how well I understood the presentations as a lay person. Witnessing the announcement live, seeing the graphs and realizing how long it took to answer that question made for quite an experience.

Well done. Thank you.

Welcome back guys, great talk

Harry Cliff takes on a difficult but very interesting topic. Well preaented! Thank you Ri!

@TheRoyalInstitution

Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

Great... So, when does consciousness enter the picture in the evolution of the universe?

Fantastic! As always! Thank God for Royal Institution! Everybody need some magic in this strange world.

55:10*perpendicular Lol! This is so awesome!! Progress is happening after such a long period of hitting walls! LIGO and the James Webb telescope are going to provide much needed data. I might be able to witness more advancements before......y'know.

@harshadadagale4253

2 жыл бұрын

Yes he said parallel but the rest of the talk was correct I suppose

When can we expect Harry Cliff in the RI theatre again?

@nenmaster5218

2 жыл бұрын

Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment that the Learning never ends, right? Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

This was brilliant! :D

This was a great video and the speaker was even better at explaining and keeping it interesting😁

@AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI-

9 ай бұрын

👌

@AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI-

9 ай бұрын

🌐🎫👌😮

When I clicked I was hoping it would be back in the auditorium and it Is! Hooray!

Nice little decoration in the background. Looks like Sol Lewitt.

Uh, excuse me, but the CERN experiments left out a few prerequisites: 1 - a pre-existent source of energy, 2 - a pre-energy process for forming forms & modes, 3 - a pre-existing cause of the previous prerequisites (of existence & expansion/explosion), 4 - pre-existing forms, properties & processes that enable expansive/explosive action/reaction, 5 - pre-existing causes of motion, implosion, expansion/explosion, etc., 6 - pre-causal sources/processes to endow the tiniest forms of form with powers, etc., 7 - pre-existent principles & qualities of being that enabled & sustain everything, 8 - pre-natural causes for everything existing in a the tiniest possible point of nothingness in the middle nowhere, 9 - existential causes of a sudden expansion of nothingness to the size of a tennis ball then, without definite causes, to become an ongoing explosion of everything (at least 93 billion LY in diameter, so far), and 10 - a cause of belief in a SM QM cosmology that ignores the preceding 9 prerequisites of being, existence, AKA reality. > So, a real recipe for a universe of being, its nature & energy has to start with nonphysical thus changelessly reliable enabling principles.

Very interesting, thank you.

Guest to grillmaster: What kind of charcoal is this, Willow? Grillmaster: No, apple pie.

@harshadadagale4253

2 жыл бұрын

Lol had to get 6 minutes into lecture to get this humour

Great immitation of Carl Sagan!!! You had me at that moment!!!

The standard model idea makes sense to me but if I was a physicist trying to figure it out, in the same way that I repair cars I always tend to end up with important looking bits left over that I have no idea where they go. Sure the car will run but I do keep those bits in a box in the back just in case. Yes I'm not a physicist but I love these lectures

Love watching this guy's physics talks

@nenmaster5218

2 жыл бұрын

Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment that the Learning never ends, right? Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

11:02 - Well, if it "increased as the square of the distance", it would become stronger as they got further away, not closer. It's actually _inversely_ proportional to the square of the distance (and directly proportional to the product of the charges).

Very entertaining and interesting video.

Fantastic talk!

Great video🤘

Excellent presentation

Amazing talk.

Food for thought... As we ponder the recipe for the universe. We are all star stuff.

I am almost halfway through the book and it too is beautifully fluid and engaging - quite a skill for what you might imagine would be a very challenging subject. Am getting smarter by the page. Thought the cover was a bit naff so covered it with a Hubble deep field printout instead....might paste a mr Kipling floating in it later

@ihavefallenandicantreachmy2113

2 жыл бұрын

Put some "Pigs, In Space", in there, please. Just in time for Pigstmas! How about "Ren and Stimpy" and/or "Newt Gingrinch", just in time for Newt Year! Mr. Kipling wearing a William Shatner Rug? "Rugyard Kipling." No?

I wish someone would text that bloke behind him to show a little respect to Professor Cliff and put his cellphone down. He's been looking at it the entire time.

Great lecture 👌

Nice one 👍

So interesting for your presentation, thank you so much. Where can I buy your book?

@TheRoyalInstitution

2 жыл бұрын

This will take you to your local Amazon - geni.us/harrycliff - but many independent book stores also stock it!

THANK YOU...!!!

Perfect for understanding the universe.

@candidobertetti27

Жыл бұрын

lol

I want that book for Christmas 👏👏👏

Excellent presenter!

I feel the likelihood of a multiverse is very real ⚡️🔥🌟

I'm making my way through the book which is extremely readable and makes more sense than most books I've read about particle physics or quantum mechanics. I am overawed by the sheer unwoldliness of it all!

@ihavefallenandicantreachmy2113

2 жыл бұрын

"Unwoldiness"? Just in time for Unwoldinesstmas!

Very good talk

This guy is the best explainer of current particle physics and admits our flawed concepts regards Higgs @31:45

@candidobertetti27

Жыл бұрын

He also explains how those flaws were addressed and fixed.

About Inflation... What would be the difference between something happening really fast vs something happening at a slower rate but nothing or very little changed during that time and then fell off the horizon of what we could detect?

generous introduction: 0:00 😁

How come there are no question answer sessions after these lectures like you have in the U.S?

Back in the lecture theater. Woot woot.

Indeed, to make an apple pie you need to make a universe. Maldacena (21st century Einstein) conjectured that the universe is a QC function, error correcting, coherent and deterministic, implying divine purpose (not Sagan's accident). And before you cook your apple pie, you need a finite axion algorithm, you will never get.

TREE OF KNOWLEDGE

So, is matter (actually, mass) just an emergent property of energy slowing down?

@rustycherkas8229

2 жыл бұрын

If so, then we are all, basically, made of light!! Still doesn't explain why some are 'brighter' than others, though...

Higgs field is the Inertial plane. Casimir Effect; Space and Counterspace, Electrons and Positrons are the plates,. The near infinite capacitance of the Inertial plane, attracts and repels the plates. Scalable Aether Universe!

9:02 secs do photons have a veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery small mass? complexity thresholds and coalescence of slowed light into matter. Compactification can be seen in the 5 fundamental nodes of plasma movement... compactification of enegy and volume can be studied and foresite can be used as well...

Since the spectrum from antimatter is identical to matter, how do we know there are no antimatter galaxies out there?

Wonderful 🍎

Long waited lecture

I seems that physicists were not computing the properties of the muon correctly in the past. This seems to explain the g-2 anomaly and may also explain the LHCb anomaly.

The bits of the recipe that are missing are in 77th Pearl: The Perpetual Tree. 🖖🏼

I always ask myself how is it even possible that our teachers are able to make science such a boring subject - there is nothing more exciting than science as a subject - it should be a mandatory subject - it represents the “ language of our existence” .

@manmarvel

2 жыл бұрын

Schools within imperial systems capitalists or not are not made to educate you they’re made to make you good workers. They’re there to get you used to suffering. That’s why I have you look at most famous scientist there either a the children of rich people or they had some really important mentor in their life on top of being smart(lucky)

@loftsatsympaticodotc

2 жыл бұрын

@@manmarvel This dystopian view is hard to digest; i.e. not true whatsoever! As someone who spent 20 years studying at 4 different institutions, this could not be further from the truth. In deed the liberal arts schools do not emphasize practical trades. If you want to become a blacksmith, or plumber, or "put-part-A-into-hole-B" production line worker,, the LAST place you would find this is our universities or even high schools. You are maybe thinking of a 'trade school'? Even there the mysterires of material science are well displayed for analysis.

@manmarvel

2 жыл бұрын

@@loftsatsympaticodotc i dont know man, i think were talking like elementary middle and highschool here.

@manmarvel

2 жыл бұрын

by the time your in college you ususally love what you are learning.

@manmarvel

2 жыл бұрын

@@loftsatsympaticodotc problem is most people never fall in love with learning, hence my 1st comment.

remember too that radiation can be due to internal complexity, and / or surface complexity upon a knot, diffable not continuuous however... its both, especially under different scaling lengths.

_"There is a whole bunch of other particles we don't really understand why they exist"_ means you don't understand the how the model works! So how can you be so sure you understand where it came from?

If nothing exists to observe a universe. Does the universe cease to exist. Maybe life and consciousness plays a bigger role?

From the near infinite capacitance of the Inertial plane out the electron vortex. Pulses from Counterspace create shells of tau, muon, electron. "The smaller the spacial footprint, the higher the capacitance." "The higher the gauss, the smaller its field."

Harry, I didn't recognise you with the beard. Great lecture as usual.

@nenmaster5218

2 жыл бұрын

Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment that the Learning never ends, right? Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

@44:00 Indirectly, he refers to gravity as a force.

Asking the question is different than having the correct answer

in earthling, 'I am that I am. Tell them I am has sent you. '

14:35 "when I was a PhD student, my office was in um, I have to be careful what I say because my boss is here, my office was in a windowless room underneath the men's 1st-floor toilets which frequently leaked, and the feeling of water dripping unexpectedly onto my head still gives me sort of panic attacks" I don't know if Harry Cliff is joking or being serious here, but that actually sounds miserable; if he's really having panic attacks, I hope he finds a good therapist. Anyway I'm looking forward to reading his new book. If it's anything like the lectures, it'll be an accessible, educational, and entertaining perspective on the recipe for the cosmos. Hopefully there are some interesting stories from LHCb as well!

We live in a hyper dimensional soundwave universe and the coalescence, trough, crest, and crash of frequencies drop out the sound waves into matter.

The quantum fields sound a bit like the 19century ether. Didn't Helmholtz think of an atom as a vortex in the "ether fluid"?

How to make an apple pie from nothing. Start with apples.

43:06 Beauty is fleeting....

28:00 skip to here absolutely nothing new before this 45:00 some newish muon stuff

@harshadadagale4253

2 жыл бұрын

Hmmm

43:17 so quarks turn into Tetris blocks?

It takes the introduction of energy into AntiDeSitter which caused deviation of lines into curves and suddenly all of the points wanted to be at the same place. But identity prevents and so the universe created an infinitesimal . And since there are infinite points on the surface of an infinitesimal there was room for everything but there was a lines of points behind that infinity that also wanted to be at that place so the universe spun that infinitesimal creating an infinitesimal moment of time which infinity can share for a moment before giving another different infinity a chance to share that surface. Neutron decay cosmology. The neutrons which invert at transition from neutron star to event horizon move through infinitesimal time to the lowest energy points of the universe (deep voids) where they decay into amorphous hydrogen. This is a 10^14 increase in size. This is the expansion of the universe. The very difficult to detect amorphous atomic hydrogen is dark matter. That and the fact that the Friedman equation should be done using a thixotropic fluid not a perfect/ideal fluid. Ideal fluids don’t vary in density. Space does.

@Just.A.T-Rex

2 жыл бұрын

The difference in density in space time is nil. If the universe was the size of the earth it would be smoother than a billiard ball.

54:30 *** perpendicular

Ripples intersect 🌟

So the Higgs Field distorts space time that then distorts the path of photons even though photons are not affected by the Higgs Field themselves?

@luciddewseed3095

2 жыл бұрын

yups

@radishpineapple74

2 жыл бұрын

Any kind of confined interaction represents mass. A photon has no rest mass, but if you put it into a perfect mirrored box, then even though it's bouncing around at the speed of light, from a distance the box appears to have a photon that's basically at rest since it's not moving out of the box. The photon box thus has a confined interaction (photon with the walls of the box) and it has a mass proportional to the number of photons in the box, due to E=mc^2. Also, the more tightly confined the photons, the smaller their wavelength must be, and thus the more mass the box has (this comes from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle). This is how protons and neutrons get most of their mass: they are systems of tightly confined quarks and gluons which have little to no mass themselves, but because they're stuck in a tiny "box", they have significant mass. By the way, this same thing does apply to other confined systems like electrons in an atom, but because the forces involved are quite weak, this confined interaction mass is negligible. Electrons themselves are always engaging in an interaction with the Higgs field which changes a particular property back and forth at a tremendous frequency. Electrons cannot escape this interaction because the Higgs field has a positive value everywhere; if not for this interaction, electrons would retain one of these values until colliding with another discrete particle. Thus electrons are constantly in a confined "box" of interaction created by the Higgs field. This means that electrons have mass even if they're not apparently interacting with anything, because actually they're always interacting with the Higgs field at a high frequency. Finally, any mass causes a curvature in spacetime. You can think of photons as always going in straight lines, with what counts as "straight" being distorted by mass. You can also think of photons as interacting with anything with mass. Both views are equivalent so long as they arrive at the same answer, so it's a matter of taste which way you'd prefer to think about it.

Or, Matter is in Space and Mass is in Counterspace! The Bullet Cluster Galaxy. Have a wheel rotating, stop the wheel, let go. The wheel starts rotating, because its Mass in Counterspace is still rotating.

It's called the Aether Field! e->~

By the time that you have a veritable zoo full of elementary particles, probably what this is telling you is that whatever these things are, they are not "elementary". Perhaps what we discover is the limits of our ability to observe and measure. It is not clear that science could really approach the question of what would necessitate the laws of physics to be as they are. In the multiverse concept, it seems likely that physical laws are not always the same, but even so, what would drive the process of "multiverse"? That answer might have to remain speculative and philosophical. The real basic building blocks are perhaps 1) circular definitions 2) paradox, 3) double negatives 4) random possibilities.