I'm a black woman from the West Indies. Unfortunately in today's society, any disagreement or lack of support on certain opinions, agenda, politics etc, is considered racist. Racism does not mean the same anymore, as it has become very political. I care more about facts, truth and Salvation through Jesus Christ. I care not what skin color he was in when on the earth, or what his appearance was. I care that he revealed himself to me and that I accept him.

@DavidGodwinCalico

2 жыл бұрын

I always thought that there is no description of Jesus is because Jesus is for everyone. What he looks like isn't important and to try and put him in a specific ethnicity is to make him and his message specifically for those people, which I don’t believe is what he is about. Jesus is for everyone.

@bearfootbears1891

2 жыл бұрын

If you are from the West Indies, you certainly do not consider yourself "black!" It has been long held and proven by Black Americans that dark skin people from nearly any part of the world INCLUDING America, who are NOT Black Americans, do NOT consider themselves "black," meaning, Black American. People from the West Indies are notoriously known for their making sure they differentiate themselves from Black Americans. So, it's no wonder you hold the opinion people being called out as racists these days are victims of a political agenda. When a Black American points out what he/she believes to be a racist, there is a 99.9 percent chance that the person identified as a racist IS a racist! To be clear, I, as a Black American, do NOT believe Metatron to be racist. I believe his KZread posts are intellectual, well researched, and well-articulated. So, before you or anyone else tries to "go there," Don't! My comment here is directed at you and any other person from the West Indies!

@kingroaster8608

2 жыл бұрын

@@bearfootbears1891 YOU’RE RIGHT! (I think)

@saragirma6577

2 жыл бұрын

@@bearfootbears1891 I am from Africa and have not lived through racism like native blacks although I lived in the USA since 12. I picked on racist quick and sensituve even cut of a friend. He is one of those who is more sublle about being racist. At one point I used to second guess myself and try to give him the benefit of the doubt. He has a white best and had black girlfriend. I am not how did not pick up about his racist side. Then realize some people maybe black but they are oblivious about racism. My judgment is not misguided. It always turn out I was right. The difference between now and before is these days many are covertly racist rather than openly.

@Jessie_James850

2 жыл бұрын

Amen sister.

Man I swear this man speaks in Times New Roman

@muninrob

2 жыл бұрын

You haven't watched much of his content - he speaks in Times OLD Roman ;-P

@jpg5359

2 жыл бұрын

@@muninrob pog

@nocturnight

2 жыл бұрын

made me laugh

@mikhailbolodo1597

2 жыл бұрын

Really? I was thinking he speaks either in Times New Roman and Papyrus.

@danielbateman6518

2 жыл бұрын

He speaks Times New Roman, but only in italics.

I absolutely love that you can bring great technical & common sense responses to your videos…outstanding job my brother 👏🏽

@WarsunGames

27 күн бұрын

UH OH! ICONS DEPICTING ''BLACK'' SAINTS, COMPILATION VIDEO Russia: President Vladimir Putin orders transfer of trinity to Moscow Cathedral | Latest News | WION Which makes this video below legitimate Family Crest Ep1 | The Tucher Family (BLACK PEOPLE RULED EUROPE) 🤴🏿🤴🏿 Byzantine Icons & Black Russians // Black Rulership 🤴🏿🤴🏿 UH OH! How many get a free trip to the lake of fire?!

@authenticartistryofhair6320

27 күн бұрын

Lol Tell me what race was first on earth? BLACK MADE IN THE MOST HIGH IMAGE. I hope this woke you up.

@leonardwest7665

25 күн бұрын

You mean like Putin did? haha, when he told the world the Truth, stop listening to thses FAKE youtube channels......

Great video. Happy new year !

Metatron, I shared your last video about the historicity of Jesus with my church youth group because I thought it was interesting and the group leader literally said that she’d love to see you talk about what Jesus would have looked like. Crazy world we live in. Keep up the good work!

@metatronyt

2 жыл бұрын

I'm glad to hear that and Say hello to her from me

@bobiboulon

2 жыл бұрын

Don't mind me, I'm just letting a comment here to be notified when you'll tell what she thinked about this video. ^^

@beckymcdonald9529

2 жыл бұрын

Oo me too!

@bobiboulon

2 жыл бұрын

*thought, not "thinked". Learn how to English, you bag of... organic matter. (Yes I'm replying to myself)

@rodrigodepierola

2 жыл бұрын

Talking about Jesús dressed as a Roman legionaire is a bit off.

I’m a 41 year old truck driver in South Carolina who is now trying to learn the Classical Latin language because of your videos. Keep up the good work.

@60sspider-man29

2 жыл бұрын

I love the profile.

@PalleRasmussen

2 жыл бұрын

That is cool. It is always good to learn.

@oznerolnavi3772

2 жыл бұрын

@@PalleRasmussen I agree.

@666mrdoctor

2 жыл бұрын

Optime!

@buffoonustroglodytus4688

2 жыл бұрын

A latin speaking truck driver. That might be a first

As a Greek i really appreciate your understanding of our complicated language ❤Very good interpretation, love from Greece 🇬🇷 ❤🎉

Absolutely marvelous work my friend

@WarsunGames

27 күн бұрын

OH This does not look good. This really make the video bad. How Russia Opens Its Vaults To Reveal Black Biblical Israelites!

The fact that Metatron, probably one of the most unbiased people I have encountered on KZread, gets called a racist by some, goes to show how ignorant people can be.

@jameslegrand848

2 жыл бұрын

Honestly, I'm getting the feeling that people are starting to use the word too losely, and it's just starting to lose its meaning. Don't get me wrong. If someone is being a scumbag then they deserve to be called what they are, but come on guys.

@alinmeleandra3175

2 жыл бұрын

the problem with current political environment is that imbeciles have been given a voice... Now, people like Metatron have their hands full trying to respond to those imbeciles otherwise he might be put into a category from which he will never be able to exit...

@a.m928

2 жыл бұрын

Unbiased in your opinion. I doubt he has been called racist. Others mught have been however.

@mikhailbolodo1597

2 жыл бұрын

I think it's not really an issue as of late... everyone has internet, from the smartest to the dumbest of people out there and any one of them could call you a racist, at this point only you can really find if you are or are not a racist by disecting your actions as people just throw those words out like "I don't like your opinion so I call you something I don't like" or something like that.

@TebTengri

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameslegrand848 i lost meaning back in about 2016

“What did Jesus really look like” Asks the guy that looks like Jesus.

@jdsayshello1

2 жыл бұрын

Lol 😂 I wonder if Metatron fancies carpentry.

@CirclingDuck

2 жыл бұрын

Haha! That cut at around 9:50 threw me a little bit!

@TimeofRagnarok

2 жыл бұрын

I think metatrons point was that he doesn't look like jesus.

@mnk9073

2 жыл бұрын

Ngl, I thought this was a coming-out video at first...

@Alex-tn7pv

2 жыл бұрын

LOL!

I found this extremely interesting. Love the enthusiasm and scientific research. Thank you, also, for the Greek translation.

17:35 at, Metatron, could you please do a scriptural reading of the original parts talking about recognising Jesus? I've heard two different interpretations, where one is that Jesus has different features and the other is that he is suddenly seen differently. Thankyou, really enjoy your content

Isaiah says that the Messiah would be 'uncomely' which means he looked ordinary.

@dawnmelton3013

2 жыл бұрын

@Cyber Ghost 3.1 precisely, the soldiers didn't know who he was.

@Dear_Mr._Isaiah_Deringer

2 жыл бұрын

I talk a lot though.

@ScrogginHausen

2 жыл бұрын

2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

@nathankelley1466

2 жыл бұрын

He was also supposed to do things which Jesus did not do, therefor he is not considered to be the messiah by them.

@danielhopkins296

2 жыл бұрын

@@ScrogginHausen " considered named by God: one from whom we hid our faces "

The statement "Let's be intellectually HONEST." in a nutshell determines why I have been watching your videos recently. The open minded and purely academic approach to these very volatile subjects is fantastic. You are a brilliant individual, your command of ancient languages is astounding and the source materials you are drawing from are most impressive. I'm very grateful to have discovered this channel.

@allisone4370

Жыл бұрын

SONG OF SOLOMON 1:4/ 1:5-7 ISRAEL WAS BLACK. THE PEOPLE LIVING OVER THERE NOW WERE CONVERTS. CREATED IN 1948 RESULTING FROM PROPAGANDA.

@feketeszabolcs2854

Жыл бұрын

@@allisone4370 You ok bro?

@keegster1882

Жыл бұрын

​​@@allisone4370 That's not what the actual passage said. Quote it correctly and in context. Also, you mentioned chapter 1 verse 4 which says nothing. You can't take one passage and make an entire doctrine out of it, which is what you're doing. The other verses you mentioned are from the perspective of a future bride for the king and she's describing herself...not all of Isreal. She also reasons that it was due to being under the sun rather than her actual skin color, but even if she was born black, she wouldn't need to reference it if that was the common skin color. A group of blacks or whites or whatever aren't going to feel the need to tell the very same group of people their skin color. Don't be one of those people obsessed with everything needing to be black. God made all colors within ONE human race.

@lostpony4885

Жыл бұрын

Oh no not honesty im not used to that

@ProudChristian73

Жыл бұрын

This comment encompasses my feelings as well, I just found him three videos ago, and now I’m hooked! God Bless!

My first time watching this video. You are never too old to learn. I enjoyed it. Amen!!!!

Great job, bro...!!!

“…let’s be intellectually honest.” That is a rare and valuable thing these days.

@flipflopski2951

2 жыл бұрын

if you want to be intellectually honest find out what mythology is...

@John-oq6fe

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed

@byoken

2 жыл бұрын

That sounded like virtue signalling to me.

@byoken

2 жыл бұрын

@@flipflopski2951 Get ready for his next video, "Did angels really have blond hair and blue eyes, as depicted in Christianity?"

@getaids7099

2 жыл бұрын

"Unless we talk about intelligence differences"

*casually puts on more and more roman gear throughout the video*

@bacon-chewtoy

2 жыл бұрын

"Who's Jesus, huh? Some joker just made out of clouds, living in the sky so he can boss me around, tell me I ain't allowed to touch myself that way 'cause it don't please him. Masturbation is specifically designed to please me! No one's getting hurt except the wildebeest. Yeah. I give him a name" ~ carl brutananadilewski

@Fhita1962

2 жыл бұрын

Oh my brother, I dreamt I was dressed in the heighth of roman fashion and that I was in charge of the tolchoking! ( Clockwork Orange)

@Sephiroth144

2 жыл бұрын

Jesus: Oh shiiiiiiit...

After finishing this video, i think you hit it spot on today. I love this stuff! Thank you for your hard work and for sharing your bright mind with us.i really appreciate it! Great video! Just great!

AWESOME VIDEO!!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH 🙏

Romans;: You know you could just point him out? Judas: *applying lip balm* I don't tell you how to live your life

@THISISLolesh

2 жыл бұрын

@ThxGod It'sOver He brought Israel OUT of Egypt. Also, African nations are mentioned in the bible separate of the Israelites, they are the Hamites.

@SageVaughn

2 жыл бұрын

LOL

@paladinheadquarters7776

2 жыл бұрын

The Romans were not there with him, it was Jews with swords and clubs that were sent, maybe with some temple guards.

@lucarod8877

2 жыл бұрын

@@paladinheadquarters7776 Indeed, If I'm not mistaken they were Sanhedrim's guards. According to the account of the gospel of John there was a (Roman) cohort present in the taking of Jesus, nonetheless. Even though, as far as I know, there was no reason for Roman soldiers to be there, for Pilate never saw Jesus as a real threat.

@darter9000

2 жыл бұрын

@@lucarod8877 Could a Roman soldier been potentially present to keep an eye on the Sanhedren’s “soldiers” rather than Jesus? After all, to the Romans, non-Roman soldiers were the potential threat rather than Jesus himself?

Probably sort of a Metatron-ish looking dude, if we're honest.

@jhoughjr1

2 жыл бұрын

He probably called his followers noble ones as well

@ReasonAboveEverything

2 жыл бұрын

Lebanese people are the living descendants of canaanites. They are hence the closest thing we have on ancient Hebrew phenotype. In other words kind of light skinned middle eastern dudes with mostly brown or black hair and dark eyes with few exceptions.

@volusian95

2 жыл бұрын

@Commie Destroyer Yeah. It's something a lot of people don't realize, and it's crazy to think of how much the Arab expansion changed the whole appearance and culture of people all across the middle east and Mediterranean.

@ernestavocado5522

2 жыл бұрын

My thought exactly. He probably looked like Metatron.

@renessanssimies384

2 жыл бұрын

I have longlt wodered why Cesare Borgia and Metatron keep manifesting in a toast.

thank you for your research Metatron. You must have spent a good amount of time bringing this to us.

Brilliant, informative and inspiring food for thought, as always Brother. God bless. ☺️🌹🙏🏽

@lorenzolucifuge1653

16 күн бұрын

Yeah I'm sure any mindless drivel that helps your denial of the real world in your mind is really "informative" to you.pathetic.

"Let's be intellectually honest." I love how you highlighted this. We do all have ideas that we love and we don't want to give them up. Your videos are just so balanced, fair, and well documented. Thanks.

@AM-bw7hv

2 жыл бұрын

Don't confuse facts with opinions. This is why we are in the mess we are in at the moment...

@hasheemadamson4117

2 жыл бұрын

What you thought is the truth is actually a dirty rotten lie. Why don't you do some personal investigation instead of taking this guy's words as the truth?

@710MaryJane

2 жыл бұрын

@@hasheemadamson4117 - Sorry Hasheem, the people of the Jewish faith are “still waiting for the Messiah.” It’s the 21st Century, and they are still waiting. Accept the fact that He came, and left this Earth for now. Sorry, your people missed him. The Talmud mentions YESHUA, (ISSA) and his ACTS. Rabbis do not deny his existence, they just don’t accept him as the Messiah.

@hasheemadamson4117

2 жыл бұрын

@@710MaryJane 😂😂😂 You are funny, I will give you that but did I give you the impression that I believe or trust any rabbi? You mentioned the Talmud so I guess maybe you have read it. Bcuz in all the three books of the Abrahamic religions The Creator made it clear that no one has the power to know when this world will end, you see. So therefore no one really knows the exact date or century that the Messiah will return. No one knows it. Not you and not me or anyone else. I am surprised you seem not to know that fact. You and I will be dead probably hundreds of thousands of years before that will happen. So to even mention the fact that we are in the 20th century and he is still not here shows how shallow your knowledge is in this matters. Let me tell you something, my people where here when the beginning began. And we will surely be here when the end comes, you can bet your life on that, my dear Mary Jane. You see, the world's climate is changing and the world is getting hotter and hotter. Some people are not built to withstand that but we on the other hand are SA - RA which in ancient Khemet (egypt) means children of RA( children of the sun). Some people can't stand the sun bcuz of their skin color so they are the ones in danger of extinction not us. We were built to withstand the sun thanks to The Creator who made us so. The Talmud is not a book that I trust to begin with. I know that, just like the Bible it has been tampered with and corrupted by the wazungus. You see, before the arrival of the Messiah my people will have to go through a process. One of the process or signs is that we will start waking up from our slumber ( ignorance of self) and realizing who we truly are. And that process has already began. It's a slow process but it's already in motion and the signs are everywhere. The wheels of change are in motion and there's nothing that can stop it. May Allah, God, Dios, Awuradi Nyankupon, uMvelinqangi Bless Africa Always. Hotep 🙏🏿

@hasheemadamson4117

2 жыл бұрын

@@710MaryJane The Israelites: Jewish man chokes on his lies. Video on KZread check it out and get an idea of what am talking about.

I remember asking one of my church pastors "What did he look like?" He responded "Does it really matter? We follow him because of his teachings & that he is the savior. What he looks like is secondary to what he taught & did for us." That response hit me hard. It was in that moment I realized that I was thinking about things that didn't matter as much. I remember learning about why Jesus is depicted the way he is & I am glad I stumbled upon your video. I also remember going to a church in Korea where a painting depicted Jesus & the apostles as Korean. In Korean hanboks & everything.

@destinationfer2

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly! THIS is why the lord says NEVER MAKE IMAGES OF ANYTHING ABOVE, ON OR BELOW THE SEA AND BOW DOWN TO IT AND/OR WORSHIP IT! My theory is he was dark but IT NEVER MATTERED FOR HE CAME AS SON OF MAN! EVEN IF YOU SAW HIM YOU COULD NEVER CAPTURE HIS MAJESTY, LIGHT AND GREAT HOLYNESS! IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HE IS SPIRIT AND A GREAT BLAZE OF BLOOD & FIRE THAT CREATES LIFE!

@lltipsy

2 жыл бұрын

@@destinationfer2 in my religion is a sin to even imagine how our prophet looks, nevermind making a painting about how he looked because that’s not important

@LightWarrior2000

2 жыл бұрын

Had the same response. "Does it really matter?"

@FREEDOMFORUKRAINE2024

2 жыл бұрын

Of course but we can assume he was lean and quite muscular because thats what carpenters tend to be like.

@destinationfer2

2 жыл бұрын

@@lltipsy i agree! This is why you cant trust any administration religion like Catholic or Mormon churches! Only The Bible is 100% correct and its many missing books! The Lord will curse anyone who adds to or removes from The Bible! And The Bible has always been clear about images and race. Only he God can create life and we all come from the seed of Noah and his great Father Adam! With time any mans seed can turn lighter or darker.

Thank you for another thought-provoking video💖✨💫

💕😙 We appreciate your enthusiasm and thoughtfulness! 😙💕

Idk probably like a Levantine person, as in, Mediterranean. Wasn't some scandanavian looking blue eyes dude but he wasn't black or likely all that dark either. I mean, Bashar Al Assad is levantine and that guy is lighter than Michael Knowles.

@admirekashiri9879

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@weedlegaliser120

2 жыл бұрын

and he has blue eyes

@TomahAwkDJ7

2 жыл бұрын

I believe so as well, the darker tan in the middle east region cames after from the arab invasion.

@AmisTheos

2 жыл бұрын

Blue eyes is a trait of Turkic origin

@admirekashiri9879

2 жыл бұрын

@@weedlegaliser120 likely not

Fun fact: It's common for art work of Jesus to depict him as the race of the artist who made it or the local race. There's art work depicting him as many different races.

@woaddragon

2 жыл бұрын

The many faces of Jesus christ.

@plzletmebefrank

2 жыл бұрын

@@iacobushadrianus7889 Errr... Wha? I mean, Christianity has been one of the most evangelistic beliefs. Usually spread by people, to other people. Instead of somehow just... Idk, falling from the sky, I guess? How would you think a worldwide belief would spread? Usually it has to be spread through people, and then that means that the people it's being spread to are being exposed to other peoples, with different characteristics, what we call different ethnicity or race. So... Yeah. Idk.

@plzletmebefrank

2 жыл бұрын

Also, what I just said might explain why Jesus has continued to be represented as a white bearded man. Cause the missionaries would probably be beared white men. So you know... Bearded white guys' religion, the main guy... Hmm... Yeah let's make him white and... Oh hey, let's give him a beard too.

@BonaparteBardithion

2 жыл бұрын

One of the local churches does a yearly display of Nativity sets. There's a section of versions from around the world. Same basic idea: Joseph, Mary, and baby Jesus in a shelter. But the way each person or the setting was depicted differed wildly.

@francescoboselli6033

2 жыл бұрын

@@plzletmebefrank what you are saying can be applied to the modern world. But in ancient and medieval times, it wasn't unusual that an artist would have lived all of his life in the same region, and never meet, or meet few times in his lifespan people of different races

I may not fully agree with all of what you've put out there for us but I most definitely appreciate it and have followed you so I can get back easily to check out more of your stuff. ;-)

Your approach is very scholarly, thank you.

Learning to understand the Bible in its ancient context is one of the most significant turning points in my journey as a Christian

@bengray5013

11 ай бұрын

Can’t be that much understanding going on if you’re still a Christian...

@dscat5908

11 ай бұрын

@@bengray5013 not much understanding going on if your not. Let the whining begin of. There is no God. Or This God is more powerful then that God. Blah, blah blah. You don't want to believe that's on you. Someone wants to believe that's on them.

@bengray5013

11 ай бұрын

@@dscat5908 you're welcome to your fairytale beliefs but stop using them as a weapon against others.

@dscat5908

11 ай бұрын

@@bengray5013 The same is true for athiest. They can believe their fairy tale as well. They use their believes against others.

@kevinouellette5316

11 ай бұрын

​@@bengray5013says the commenter watching the video about Jesus

In the last time you are making really good and well researched videos. One of the best channels on YT

@metatronyt

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much

@marcrubin8844

2 жыл бұрын

1000% in agreement.

All I can say is that I have liked your teachings so very much. You don't insult or hurt or despise anyone or your teachings do not aim at demeaning anyone. Keep it up. I like the way you draw your conclusion. Looking forward to seeing you in another video. I am ready and eager waiting for it.

Thank you very informative and I like the way you explained everything in detail, and referring to scriptures

This is probably the best history channel I've ever seen on KZread! This is exactly what modern discussion should be like, getting the facts straight and whenever something is ambiguous, give your own conclusions in a respectful way, instead we have colleges that teach students what to think and not HOW TO THINK, so, whenever someone gives them a factual counterargument, they throw a temper tantrum like little children. Congratulations and keep up the good work!

@coreybul

10 ай бұрын

yes...instead of reading scriptures in prayer and learning directly from the almighty...man learns by the doctrine of man in mans schools... matthew 15:3 “but he answered and said to them why do ye as well transgress the commandment of the almighty by your tradition?” mary j

@termination9353

7 ай бұрын

@@coreybul There never was multiple Gospels by multiple authors. The Gospel was originally one book, written by Lazarus in consultation with the Apostles [John 21:24] and published soon after Jesus left them on their own. The religion was hijacked by Rome, the Gospel was broken up scrambled adulterated into a bunch of competing narratives. Later four of those adulterated gospels were canonized with falsely ascribed authorship and a Gnosticism cover-story. It was the finding of an original Gospel of Jesus scroll in Jerusalem that gained the Knights Templar power over the Church and their eventual undoing when the church finally retaliated against them Friday 13th.

@coreybul

7 ай бұрын

@@termination9353 the spiritual father would never let them corrupt his word so much so as to not give us a light in his words to give us that connection...there is a season and a time for all things under the sun...as i have experienced through the spirit...and I do find it shows the coming of so many things...like 911...had we studied back then he would have shown us back then...but the world became a huge distraction...mj

@termination9353

7 ай бұрын

@@coreybul I don’t believe you have the Holy Spirit. What is the significance of the Gospel dividing a genealogy by fourteen generations? Or how about, What did Jesus write in the dust with his finger? What scripture in the Bible specifically predicts the 9/11 attack?

@coreybul

7 ай бұрын

@@termination9353 yea you're right i do not have the antichrist holy spirit from the popes and the king of this world...so let's end your babble here...have a blessed day...mj

"Peter had to be told: 'Mate, that's Jesus!'" lol Great video. Very interesting.

@Sephiroth144

2 жыл бұрын

Of course, if he was shining and glowing like in the Revelation verse, you'd think he'd stand out a bit... Dude, that's Jesus. THAT'S JESUS?!? How the hell do you know that?

@fasiapulekaufusi6632

2 жыл бұрын

I agree Jesus would not look the same after resurrection. As the bible says in resurrection we will be resurrected into a more glorified body. Not a earthly body.

The hair, beard and garment convinced for subscribe, Tysm.

I could listen to your voice all day.

WELL I AM BLACK ..and am enjoying watching your videos ..dont mind the people just do Gods work..your videos are helpful..thank you may THA LORD JESUS CHRIST BLESS YOU

@etgecho9393

Жыл бұрын

Coon

From a theologist's point of view I can say that this is how exegesis is done scientifically correct. Pretty nice and informative video!

@DandrebBernardes

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, reminds me of my professor who taught exegesis and theology of the new testament. She was a great professor, miss her classes. Way to go, that's how we were taught how it should be done!

@NukeGaza2024

2 жыл бұрын

How? Science and myths don't mix. None of that bible shit is real

@FullyBadDad

2 жыл бұрын

@@NukeGaza2024 May the Spirit fall upon you and lead you into all things true!

@mweskamppp

2 жыл бұрын

@@NukeGaza2024 It is still written by people who used their background and surroundings. Originally i would say there were some oral traditions for the old testament who were then put on paper by different people. Thats the reason for different versions of the same stories. they took from different traditions and the editors did not want to confront any of the directions. For later happenings they formed stories on purpose, sometimes to integrate people and give them space in the forming legend of "the people". The tribe Dan f.e. was most probably a philistine group. Simson with the hair and blunt weapon and the hard jobs to work reminds of Hercules or Thor, who have the same indo-european origin. My opinion.

@NukeGaza2024

2 жыл бұрын

@@mweskamppp nah. That's just head cannon. Also their are NO gods

I’ve been in Jesus’s presence His voice is full of kindness and love, I was sick in bed and He stood by my bed I could not lift my head because of extreme pain so I never saw his face but his voice just spoke of love and caring ! He asked me what I wanted as tears streamed down my face I said please take this pain away I awoke next morning and was fine ! Going for major surgery years later I was in operation room and panicking “ Jesus where are you ? You said you would be with me ! “ I am here and a undescribable light glowed in the corner peace fell over me and I awoke hours later in recovery! Now I am able as a more mature Christian to know He is always with me in times of need and I have nothing to fear !

@Herobeans

10 күн бұрын

Was he blond and blue eyed?

@NoJa.

21 сағат бұрын

Funnily enough had a dream once and he was neither black or white but had the energy religion preached about 😂

@darrenthomas5137

8 сағат бұрын

Is he golden blonde and powerful blue eyes, fair skin. To answer the question. From my experience as young boy. It’s a yes.

That was an awesome video!

I can't believe I'm about to watch Jesus debate his own appearance.

@bpater12

2 жыл бұрын

Highly underrated comment, I spit out my coffee 🤣

@josephperkins4080

2 жыл бұрын

🤔🤔🤔weird huh

@commissarf1196

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Edit 1: Because Metatron looks like him Edit 2: I'm not even Cristian, but what got me to click is, *the thumbnail.* Metatron looks just like him it's hilarious.

@wallaroo1295

2 жыл бұрын

🤣 Yeah, and in a few parts of the video, I think it is very much intentional, to illustrate that Jesus was just a guy. A very theocratic-politically active guy, who died for his cause. He technically wasn't even the main guy in the movement, John the Baptist was...

@kallekallenen4346

2 жыл бұрын

Welcome to the era of "there is no races" but BLM needs races to exist so that they can discriminate and be victims at the same time. But nobody is expecting logic from leftists since logic is a "white construct" and racist therefor.

OH...I JUST FOUND THIS VIDEO ON HOW JESUS MAY HAVE LOOKED. Love it !! Very easily understood, fun, common sensical, explaining the background of what you're talking about making it meaningful for those who aren't familiar with the Biblical history. I'm a subscriber now, & a Christian. Thanks much for you work.

@metatronyt

Жыл бұрын

Hello Cindy and thank you very much for subscribing, I appreciate. Welcome to the community of noble ones. In the next few days, I'll be releasing a highly detailed video on the Shroud of Turin, which might interest you. Have a great day.

@levite2059

Жыл бұрын

A complete REFUTAL of Metatron’s video #1.He said nonbias but immediately after he stated that Jesus is not black and trying to refute rev 1. #2. He started to trace Jesus’s ethnicity from 2,000 years ago instead of going back to genesis or at least from Noah. #3. Then he said he’s going to start from a clean slate without any personal preferences and image expectation when not even a second before, he said that Jesus isn’t black like the Africans. He continues to say if Jesus is black, brown etc., it wouldn’t matter to him when he already build up an image in his mind what Jesus isn’t and who he wants Jesus to be, I believe that’s CONFIRMATION BIAS. Lol, lol, I really have to laugh because this racist, bias guy is funny. #4. He said the governing changed the image of Jesus Christ to look like them and not the governed. I couldn’t agree more with him on this one because that’s exactly why Jesus is not portrayed as his correct color, black, the governed. Caucasians governing and blacks are governed. #5. Nobody believes that Jesus was African, he was not a Canaanite or Kushite, He is a Hebrew Israelite. The problem is that you fail to realize that the biblical and historical Hebrew Israelites were black just like the Hamites. In Gen 42:7-8 Joseph ONLY changed his voice and his brothers didn’t recognize him but he recognized them. If Joseph was Caucasian he would have stand out amongst the other Egyptians but he was black just like the ancient Egyptians and that’s why he could change his voice and not being recognized by his brothers. In theology, there is a thing call “analogy of faith” where you compare scripture to scripture in order to arrive at a conclusion because all scriptures are harmoniously united and not contradictory. Therefore , In order to understand Revelations 1:14 you have to read Daniel 7:9 KJV the Ancient of days (God Almighty Jesus Christ) garment as white as snow, the hair of His head LIKE THE PURE WOOL (Black man’s hair texture). #6. Jesus looked different after his resurrection doesn’t mean that he didn’t have a body because he ate with the disciples after his resurrection. Him being God can cause them not to recognize him. #7. Like I said before, you can’t tell what Jesus looked like by only knowing what Galilean men in the first century looked like. If that’s the case I can just say Jesus was black like the men in Galilee at that time because all the Jews in Galilee were black.However, there were different ethnicities in Galilee at the time of Jesus. Also, how do we know that those men were actually from Galilee and not imposters from the governing. Just like how he said the Romans changed the image of Jesus, that’s the same way we cannot trust your so-called iconography, etc. It’s like saying, I can know what Martin L King looked like by looking at what men in Tennessee looked like in the 19th century. This is if I didn’t know what he looks like. #8. The gospels weren’t written in the first century, according to most theologians, 80% of the New Testament manuscript dated to the 5th century or later with the oldest, the single most authenticated fragment, papyrus 52, dated to the mid 2nd century. It wouldn’t make no sense for Judas to say Jesus looked like the black guy when Jesus Christ and the 12 tribes of Israel are all Black. lol, lol, this guy continues to make me laugh. You are confusing the way how people in that area looked today with the biblical and historical people in that area. Those coins doesn’t prove anything, how do you know that the person on the coin bending his knees were Jews? Did the coin say they were Jews or you assumed they were Jews? Also how do we know that those coins were from the first century for sure. The person kneeling down wasn’t even bowing down in front of the roman Soilder on the coin. Those so call pictures of Jews in the temple was painted by the governing Caucasian and not the governed blacks (Jews). #9. You are using proof from a modern day Caucasian Israeli biohistorian, it’s like the police investigating themselves, what a joke, no independence. Jesus looked nothing like the modern day Iraqi, he was an Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah. The modern day people in that region are hybrid , mixture of the original inhabitants of the land (blacks) and Caucasian Romans, Greeks and Arabs due to the invasions. That land is the biblical Canaan, promised land. Canaan father is Cush/Ethiopia (burn face, black face people), Ham means Hot and a word means BLACK. Abraham’s grandfather and brother both named Nahor, descendant of Shem comes from the Hebrew root word “Harar”which also means burn, Charred or Hot for Black. That’s why Nahor is a slang for Nigger. Acts 13:1 KJV version: Barnabas and Simeon was also called Niger (BLACK in Greek and Latin). Songs of Solomon 1:5 “I am BLACK but comely (beautiful)”, Job 30:30 Job said “My skin is BLACK”. Daniel 7:9 said the Ancient of days, Jesus Christ which is the same Alpha and Omega in Rev chapter 1, His hair is as “PURE WOOL” and if you study hair genetics, you would learned that wool hair is EXCLUSIVE to BLACK people and if a Caucasian person have wool hair it’s considered a disorder calls “wooly hair syndrome” and I’m certain Jesus Christ didn’t have a disorder. Please see below for a reference to the name NAHOR from naming.net www.nameaning.net/both/Nahor Cush or Ethiopia had a son name Nimrod who’s kingdom was Babel/Babylon or Chaldea Chaldeans , Gen 10:8-12, so the Chaldeans/Babylonians were also black like their father and Granfather Nimrod and Ethiopia respectively. And guess what, Abraham was BORN in Ur of Chaldea/Babylon. So we can conclude again that Abraham was an Ethiopian Hebrew , Genesis 14:13. Judean men in biblical times were black like there ancestors, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob according to scriptures and ancient history. Therefore we can conclude that metatron research and description is highly flawed, biased and racist. I chose to believe what the scriptures says over what man says!!!

@EdenSophia118

Жыл бұрын

@@levite2059 Those in Israel today are not mixtures. They are from the Russian steps and surrounding areas. Their Kingdom was CONVERTED to Judaism in the 700s.

@rickyrichreacts9667

Жыл бұрын

Sorry to burst y’all bubbles but the Bible was completely false. It was just weirdos making up stories because, again, they were kind of out of their mind. If the Bible is real.. why hasn’t there been a revised copy by now? How come none of the crazy things they said they did back then like walk on water, Jesus being resurrected, etc. how come we haven’t seen anybody do any of those things in real life? Stop believing a damn fairy tell kids.

@damo5701

Жыл бұрын

@@levite2059 You do realise that Jesus was not in the old testament, right? Pre christianity the trinity did not exist and the Jews had no concept of the son of god. Whatever is in the old testament is a moot point. If he actually existed (ie was a real historical figure) then he would be much the same as the peoples of the Levant at that time. Worrying about color seems to be a very modern day thing, who cares and why? and what difference does it make to his message ? Instead it seems to be something to divide people not unite them.

As a black woman, I never really cared what Jesus looked like but assumed he would just look like the people who are over that way. Of course, people migrate over thousands of years in a certain area but I think generally they have olive/brown skin in the Middle East perhaps...

@michaelcooreman3509

4 ай бұрын

@MJ-jz1ju True and its even forbidden to promote the images of prophets...

@garywatson3434

20 күн бұрын

ROOT OF DAVID LORD OF LORDS KING OF KINGS CONQUERING LION OF THE TRIBE OF JUDAH

@YirenkyiClarice

9 күн бұрын

You have said it perfectly well. Jesus must have looked like his own kind. A Middle Eastern guy with rather a woolly dark hair that turned white because of aging or the stress he faced in those days. Nonetheless, people should focus on the peace that he tried to teach when he came down the earth. Let's stop killing God's children all over the globe.✌️🙏

@VOLRAK1

2 күн бұрын

Uh uh....and where is this "middle east"? Was it not in the head of some European man? (english), I believe. The same Europeans who have corrupted absolutely everything they touch in order to place themselves on the top because of white supremacy born out of racism that doesn't exist. This is how Jesus became hippy Mark from the sales department. That is a crime and anyone who does believe in christ, God should not just be like "meh, I dont care what he looks like" that's the same attitude that has helped to destroy the faith and leave this absolute mess in 2024.

Thank you very much for a very interesting and enlightening account of what Jesus might have looked like! I really enjoyed it.

For me being a non native English speaker it was very easy to follow and understand your explanations. My compliments. Very interesting and educational

@levite2059

Жыл бұрын

#1.He said nonbias but immediately he’s saying that Jesus is not black and trying to refute rev 1. #2. He started to trace Jesus’s ethnicity from 2,000 years ago instead of going back to genesis or at least from Noah. #3. Then he said he’s going to start from a clean slate without any personal preferences and image expectation when not even a second before, he said that Jesus isn’t black like the Africans. He continues to say if Jesus is black, brown etc., it wouldn’t matter to him when he already build up an image in his mind what Jesus isn’t and who he wants Jesus to be, I believe that’s CONFIRMATION BIAS. Lol, lol, I really have to laugh because this racist, bias guy is funny. #4. He said the governing changed the image of Jesus Christ to look like them and not the governed. I couldn’t agree more with him on this one because that’s exactly why Jesus is not portrayed as his correct color, black, the governed. Caucasians governing and blacks are governed. #5. Nobody believes that Jesus was African, he was not a Canaanite or Kushite, He is a Hebrew Israelite. The problem is that you fail to realize that the biblical and historical Hebrew Israelites were black just like the Hamites. In Gen 42:7-8 Joseph ONLY changed his voice and his brothers didn’t recognize him but he recognized them. If Joseph was Caucasian he would have stand out amongst the other Egyptians but he was black just like the ancient Egyptians and that’s why he could change his voice and not being recognized by his brothers. In theology, there is a thing call “analogy of faith” where you compare scripture to scripture in order to arrive at a conclusion because all scriptures are harmoniously united and not contradictory. Therefore , In order to understand Revelations 1:14 you have to read Daniel 7:9 KJV the Ancient of days (God Almighty Jesus Christ) garment as white as snow, the hair of His head LIKE THE PURE WOOL (Black man’s hair texture). #6. Jesus looked different after his resurrection doesn’t mean that he didn’t have a body like us because he ate with the disciples after his resurrection. Him being God can cause them not to recognize him. #7. Like I said before, you can’t tell what Jesus looked like by only knowing what Galilean men in the first century looked like. There were different ethnicities in Galilee t the time of Jesus. Also, how do we know that those men weee actually from Galilee and not imposters from the governing. Just like how he said the Romans changed the image of Jesus, that’s the same way we cannot trust your so-called iconography, etc. It’s like saying, I can know what Martin L King looked like by looking at what men in Tennessee looked like in the 19th century. This is if I didn’t know what he looks like. #8. The gospels weren’t written in the first century, according to most theologians, 80% of the New Testament manuscript dated to the 5th century or later with the oldest with the single most authenticated fragment, papyrus 52, dated to the mid 2nd century. It wouldn’t make no sense for Judas to say Jesus looked like the black guy when Jesus Christ and the 12 tribes of Israel are all Black. lol, lol, this guy continues to make me laugh. You are confusing the way how people in that area looked today with the biblical and historical people in that area. Those coins doesn’t prove anything, how do you know that the person on the coin bending his knees were Jews? Did the coin say they were Jews or you assumed they were Jews? Also how do we know that those coins were from the first century for sure. The person kneeling down wasn’t even bowing down in front of the roman Soilder on the coin. Those so call pictures of Jews in the temple was painted by the governing Caucasian and not the governed blacks (Jews). #9. You are using proof from a modern day Caucasian Israeli biohistorian, it’s like the police investigating themselves, what a joke, no independence. Jesus looked nothing like the modern day Iraqi, he was an Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah. The modern day people in that region are hybrid , mixture of the original inhabitants of the land (blacks) and Caucasian Romans, Greeks and Arabs due to the invasions. That land is the biblical Canaan, promised land. Canaan father is Cush/Ethiopia (burn face, black face people), Ham means Hot and a word means BLACK. Abraham’s grandfather and brother both named Nahor, descendant of Shem comes from the Hebrew root word “Harar”which also means burn, Charred or Hot for Black. That’s why Nahor is a slang for Nigger. Acts 13:1 KJV version: Barnabas and Simeon was also called Niger (BLACK in Greek and Latin). Songs of Solomon 1:5 “I am BLACK but comely (beautiful)”, Job 30:30 Job said “My skin is BLACK”. Daniel 7:9 said the Ancient of days, Jesus Christ which is the same Alpha and Omega in Rev chapter 1, His hair is as “PURE WOOL” and if you study hair genetics, you would learned that wool hair is EXCLUSIVE to BLACK people and if a Caucasian person have wool hair it’s considered a disorder calls “wooly hair syndrome” and I’m certain Jesus Christ didn’t have a disorder. Please see below for a reference to the name NAHOR from naming.net www.nameaning.net/both/Nahor Cush or Ethiopia had a son name Nimrod who’s kingdom was Babel/Babylon or Chaldea Chaldeans , Gen 10:8-12, so the Chaldeans/Babylonians were also black like their father and Granfather Nimrod and Ethiopia respectively. And guess what, Abraham was BORN in Ur of Chaldea/Babylon. So we can conclude again that Abraham was an Ethiopian Hebrew , Genesis 14:13. Judean men in biblical times were black like their ancestors, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob according to scriptures and ancient history. Therefore we can conclude that metatron research and description is highly flawed, biased and raciest. I chose to believe what the scriptures says over what man says!!!

@verenatuna9010

Жыл бұрын

@@levite2059 Cush is from Ham's line, Cush was also the forefather of the ancient Egyptians via his son Mizraim. Mesopotamia was the land given to Shem's people, so Nimrod was there against Gods will, he was rebellious against God. The book of Jubilees is more in detail about this, but you can also find this in your bible.

@levite2059

Жыл бұрын

@@verenatuna9010 Cush was not the forefather of the ancient Egyptians, Cush (Ethiopia) and Egypt (Mizraim) were brothers. Ham was Their father.

@verenatuna9010

Жыл бұрын

@@levite2059 I'm sorry, you are correct on this. Yet, the Chaldeans were from Shem, Cushites from Ham. Just because Nimrod was ruling in Mesopotamia, it doesn't make him a Shemite...

@antnam4406

Жыл бұрын

He is not a native English speaker.

A not-so-hidden-hint about Christ's outward appearance and His lack of "sticking out from the crowd" is found in Isaiah 53:2b: "...he hath no form or comeliness; and when we see him, _there is_ no beauty that we should desire him." So right there I could have told you that He looked like an average Jewish man of the time period.

@bobisallright

2 жыл бұрын

This argument is interesting but it's really only persuasive to Christians. If you're not Christian, why would you believe Isaiah - a Jewish prophet from 700-something BC - was talking about Jesus?

@mpalfadel2008

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobisallright interesting point

@mayanboricua

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobisallright No, even as a Christian, that should be a very relevant question. Especially as a Christian, I'd argue. How do we know Isaiah was referring to Jesus in that passage? Context clues, I suppose. Isaiah was probably clear about who he was talking about. I suspect all the surrounding paragraphs concerned the same person, and made it known who this person was. It sounds to me that Isaiah was referring to the coming Messiah. If Jesus was in fact that messiah, then the passage can only refer to Jesus. There the messiah is described as a regular looking jew. Therefore, Jesus would have to look like a regular jew, in order to qualify as messiah, according to Isaiah. Very helpful in nailing down the messiah's appearance, and by extension Jesus's. Religious or not. And none of that changes whether you're a Christian, Atheist or Buddhist. The reader's religion is irrelevant. If Isaiah in fact mentions the Messiah at line 53 of the book, then the Messiah is mentioned by Isaiah at line 53. Period. Your atheism be damned. All your atheism can do is classify the subject as fiction. All the atheism in the world couldn't change the contents of Line 53. It says what it says, true or not. Likewise, if Harry escapes Voldemort at the end of Chapter 32, then Harry escapes Voldemort at ch32, fiction or not. Religious or not. And no amount of belief or disbelief can ever change the ending of Ch32, fiction or not. It's irrelevant to the in-universe canon. And I am not claiming that it's impossible to change the text of the Bible. That's been done like a million times over the centuries. I am merely clarifying the effect of Atheism on biblical matters.

@DavidOhlerkingII

2 жыл бұрын

Real Jesus ugly AF.

@barkasz6066

2 жыл бұрын

@@mayanboricua he wasn’t referring to Jesus. He lived 700 years before him if Jesus ever even existed. Religion is entirely man-made. He imagined their savior as a completely average, unremarkable man. Shocker. Imagine giving a very precise description of what your savior will look like. You’d have a hard time trying to fit anyone into that box. Broad descriptions are statistically the easiest to fulfill. You give the impression of providing details when in fact you speak in generalities.

A very interesting study of the question in a manner that is both respectful of the religious aspect of the matter but at the same time, done in a manner that objectively observes the potential realities of the possible pragmatic options. I would suggest perhaps one other alternative that you might wish to investigate. I have heard it suggested that during his childhood and early adulthood, not much is covered in detail because he had traveled to India and had studied there before returning to the middle east. IF and granted, I offer no evidence of this either way save for the suggestion I have carried forward this is then the historical case, would his appearance possibly have been affected by his time there in both physical appearance from both time mostly inside studying, as well as nutritional and cultural effects? It might be worth looking into as a possible influence for some of the depictions' details. Thank you for presenting these videos.

Love how you've turned your hobby into art.

As I age I realize I don't have enough time to learn everything that I would like to. I try to learn at least one new thing every day, and today was a treat when I stumbled upon this channel!

@Iluvmuneey

2 жыл бұрын

Keep God first and u can stay young forever

@mykiyahyah-el4746

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely but even worse jesus is not real only a white image replacement of our true Messiah.

@Iluvmuneey

2 жыл бұрын

@@mykiyahyah-el4746 bro jesus is real ofc not the white washed version but his name is jesus IN ENGLISH. U might as well say none of the names of anyone in the bible are real with that kind of thinking because there are no j in hebrew jesus name is yeshua hamasiach

@Iluvmuneey

2 жыл бұрын

@Shango its not Yahawashi its Yeshua why tf do my brothers and sisters keep making up names for the Lord and butchering tf out of his name ITS YESHUA not Yahawashi stop making up names

@Iluvmuneey

2 жыл бұрын

@Shango buddy i definitely havent cursed any commandments

"Lets be intellectually honest". I totally agree. Lets do this in all things.

@TimeofRagnarok

2 жыл бұрын

No truer words ever spoken.

@anno5936

2 жыл бұрын

most would be/feel offended then...

@MudHut67

2 жыл бұрын

The majority of normies who say this are midwits that will always be dishonest

@gottaproxy8826

2 жыл бұрын

*takes 93rd vaccinations shot* i agree

@blues05

2 жыл бұрын

Yes let's; Isaac Newton was black! Einstein was actually Ethiopian black Jew! Everyone was black then!

Well done. You are very professional and honest - that's why they cannot throw anything at you. Logical arguments, clear thinking, no bullshit. Greetings from Greece.

I will look up whether you have discussed the man of the Shroud of Turin. I have seen amazongly compelling evidenceabout the shroud and believe his teue image was captured there. Thank you for all your hard work.

"A triangle would think God was triangular" Spinoza. Paraphrasing I'm sure

@fossilfountain

2 жыл бұрын

That is true except Indian gods are blue

@greattribulation1388

2 жыл бұрын

Does not apply here.

@riteshyeddu9186

2 жыл бұрын

@@fossilfountain no, they aren't. They're just depicted that way in some idols

@IIARROWS

2 жыл бұрын

@@riteshyeddu9186 They are still mostly human shaped.

@riteshyeddu9186

2 жыл бұрын

@@IIARROWS you’re right, but I live in India, and nobody over here believes that the gods are blue. The idols of dark skinned gods are painted with blue paint, which is just a tradition. (The only exception to this is a God who is believed to have a blue neck because he drank poison but didn’t swallow it according to a story)

"Green Jesus" 🤣 Scientology be like: "WE TOLD YOU!"

@stevenclark5173

2 жыл бұрын

@Black Box Painting There not trying to get one up on anyone, they are a vicious cult and a pyramid scheme.

@mykulpierce

2 жыл бұрын

Osiris jesus theory confirmed

@haze6647

2 жыл бұрын

Jesus after failed to perform his famous "water walk" then fell into a pond of green algae 😂

@MonographicSingleheaded

2 жыл бұрын

@@haze6647 washed up in Japan and they called him Kappa.

@whathell6t

2 жыл бұрын

@@MonographicSingleheaded Nope! The Japanese called Jesus Christ Ultraman Ace due to him once again crucified by soldiers of Alien Seijin Empera. Seriously, it’s not a joke, it was brutal.

Excellent video. I'm R1b1haplogroup and I'm considered African American and I try to explain what your video just revealed. I'm a copper tone skin color and have middle eastern facial features with tight to wavy to curly hair depending on the length. I explained to many AA people that he looked like someone from that geographical region of the world.

so many thoughts I planned to write down got answered and dealt with as I watched the whole video. Love your stuff, it doesn't hurt that I agree with you most of the time, but you really do present all the possible answers without pushing any certain agenda. We should clone you and repopulate the world with clear thinking intelligent people, I'll get right on that!

Isaiah 53 : 2 says something of the sort of: "He didn’t have any beauty or majesty that made us notice him. There wasn’t anything special about the way he looked that drew us to him." I take that to mean he was your basic, average looking Jewish man that more or less blended in with the other Jews of the time. Not that it matters, but I take it to mean he should have looked like most any other guy from his time and region. The Judas kiss to identify him you mention is excellent support for that idea.

@akatheheretic3014

2 жыл бұрын

BINGO !! 😉👍👍

@lindastrang6755

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly! :)

@carolynraley4047

2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking about that verse too but forgot where it was. Thanks. Question: Did the narrator (sorry, I don't know his name - my first time watching him - but I loved this video and have subscribed), did he show a picture of an average Jewish man of the time, i.e., what Jesus looked like? I can go through this again and check. Sorry if he did show such a person and I missed it. Thanks. :)

@akatheheretic3014

2 жыл бұрын

@@carolynraley4047 All One has to do , is Look👥👀 at the 💁Indigenous people Born and raised in Palestine . . to see what First Century Jews looked like ! 🤷

@carolynraley4047

2 жыл бұрын

@@akatheheretic3014 Okay, thank you. I searched on Google and got pics now. Much appreciated.

You want a correct rapresentation of Jesus? Just look at Metatron back from a Holiday after a good tan. That's it.

@raimohoft1236

2 жыл бұрын

In a nutshell... 🤗

@l.av.h7812

2 жыл бұрын

Almost

@slewone4905

2 жыл бұрын

i was going to say

@slewone4905

2 жыл бұрын

@John High I would think that Jesus would have a Jewfro.

@91rumpnisse

2 жыл бұрын

Metatron is the Messiah reincarnate confirmed.

❤u make my day thanks a lot 😅

I'm writing on a medieval novel (AD 1344) and I'm a proffesional 'cleaner of haunted houses', so I'd LOVE more videos on this subject to get a higher validity.

When I did my Classics Degree, the reason why I also studied Classical Latin and Greek was because translations into English were so unreliable.

@bigguy7353

2 жыл бұрын

Which is funny, because as someone who more than dabbles in English etymology, knowing the Greek and Latin roots of the English words that have them and word structure using them (prefixes, suffixes, et cetera) has helped me effectively build an amateur understanding of Greek and Latin by sheer exposure.

@AndersJackson

2 жыл бұрын

ANY translation between languages are unreliable. And when you go between texts that are nearly 2000 years and today, there are more differences to take into account. Like what colours there are words for. Like Black is not a known colour in Scandinavia during Viking age. They said Blue instead. And there are different cultural expressions, that you have to know if you shall do a proper translation. In short, translation is hard, and translation makes differences to the text.

@gizabit

2 жыл бұрын

Ooh ooh look at you

@charadradam9985

2 жыл бұрын

@@AndersJackson its not a matter of simple words like the colours or sth like this... its because greek has more words about high meanings and more different words than the english translations can offer.

@AndersJackson

2 жыл бұрын

@@charadradam9985 thanks for explaining that you don't understand translations. It is more then just Words, and then explain that is about Words. It is about phraces etç.

The science fiction author Robert Heinlein had one of his characters say that Jesus would have been a hearty strong man, because he was a carpenter. There were only primitive tools. You would need a lot of muscles to be a carpenter back then. His character questioned why Jesus was always depicted as skinny and frail. I think this makes a lot of sense.

@asardessazoe7561

2 жыл бұрын

watch the following video: kzread.info/dash/bejne/rKF5tcWChcbcqpM.html it clearly explains it all.

Wonderful video.

Was there ever a video on the letters to Tiberius from Pontius Pilatus?

I'm a Christian and this is brilliant. I love ýour methodology. You and I love the truth and have the integrity and to go searching. You aren't afraid to present actual fact.

@FrankBailey-gw6bw

5 ай бұрын

Christianity is not good

@FrankBailey-gw6bw

5 ай бұрын

Living a lie

@FrankBailey-gw6bw

4 ай бұрын

Cause he lieing

@danielbrowniel

2 ай бұрын

Has he done a video about lost tribes?/ the dispersed Northern Kingdom?

@dantasticmania8728

2 ай бұрын

He's actually come out as Christian and even has a link to a private video in why he's become a believer. In spite of that he's pretty dead and does most of his work through actual historical facts and logic.

There is a line from, "Indiana Jones and the last crusade" where he is asked, "do you seek the grail for God's glory or yours?" This is the same issue I see with a lot of people trying to determine what Jesus looked like. They're not seeking it for his glory but their own. I think you did a great job of being very fair in your research from an academic and intellectual perspective. I think the fact really remains it doesn't matter because Jesus wasn't sent here to only save a skin tone but our souls.

@wesleywilliams5202

2 жыл бұрын

Heres the problem with that to me what was being seemed when jesus was painted as a white surfer dude....black slaves had no problem obeying him it keep them enslaved..now the truth comes out and your racist color dint matter..well according to the bible there's a people who are lost carried by ships and scatter them among the earth. Jesus is coming back and is going to gather the nations and ask what did you do to my people.only people that fits that description is the black slave trade who place just so happened to be called Negroland also called kingdom of judah

@Jw-no7id

2 жыл бұрын

@@wesleywilliams5202 Exactly which black slave trade are you referring to?

@wesleywilliams5202

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jw-no7id the same s Black slaves that was brought into slavery carried by ships and scatter among the earth name any other people who fits this description I'm waiting

@Jw-no7id

2 жыл бұрын

@@wesleywilliams5202 The bible spoke of this in the past tense and you're trying to apply it to happenings centuries after it was written. Slavery was practiced every where humans existed by all ethnicities towards all ethnicities. Your belief that this only applies to one ethnicity is quite telling.

@justinmartin4662

2 жыл бұрын

Every kind of people have been enslaved and brought over world at some time. If you think Blake people were the only ones then you obviously don’t care enough about history to learn it. You shouldn’t just expect other people to educate you. Blacks weren’t even the only ones in the Atlantic slave trade, but because Africans have always enslaved each other because of tribalism there were just so many more blacks available that the others don’t receive any attention.

I've traveled quite a bit, been to a lot of churches and I have never met a Christian who thought Jesus was actually blonde and blue eyed. We generally know that those are later artistic depictions. Maybe it's just my denomination (Baptist) but we don't hang pictures of Jesus, the only depictions we have are usually cartoon type drawings for kids. We deliberately avoid pictures because that misses the point and especially in a very diverse culture it can be a distraction

Excellent documentation .

As a Christian, let me just say, this was an honest description of the possible look of Jesus l ever heard. I loved every minute of this video. It absolutely was intellectually honest and done with pure respect. Delivered in the most inoffensive way possible. Thank you

@HenkJanBakker

2 жыл бұрын

Just one itsy bitsy thing. Having a Roman soldier tell it? Not that I mind because I know the context but having 'the guys that killed him' tell it does feel a bit in your face.

@eliteteamkiller319

2 жыл бұрын

@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese The fact that anyone even needs to ask the question based on the geography of where these events took place is even more hilarious. He was brown, not white, not black. He looked like an Iraqi Jew. Obvious facts simply from looking the people who live over there. Nevertheless, the "secular academic" doesn't trust tradition. The "secular academic" requires EVIDENCE, and it is the "secular academics" that ultimately are responsible for your privilege to make this statement and send it all over the world to people you will never see or meet. Without "secular academics" there is no methodological naturalist movement in science (an attempt to describe the natural laws systematically without appealing to magic). Without a methodological naturalist movement in science, there is no Isaac Newton, no Faraday, no Guass, no Maxwell, no Babbage (created the first computer - and also a proponent of natural theology, the idea that God is revealed through his created laws, and no "contrivances" e.g., no magic or revelation, is necessary to believe in God or for creation outside of the creation of the laws themselves), etc. And why? Why was methodological naturalism necessary for this? Because choosing to explain things by "God did it" ends the line of questioning and cuts off any possibility of finding repeatable, predictable results that can explain the phenomenon in question. In other words, _you can't learn anything by just saying "God did it" and not trying to find a mechanistic explanation!_ That doesn't mean God doesn't exist, which for some reason you people tend to assume. It simply means that the best way to find out about the natural world is to try to understand it with the things that are natural.

@eliteteamkiller319

2 жыл бұрын

@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese Sorry about you being censored. KZread has a weird spam algorithm. It gets me as well. I do not consider what I said as a straw man, but it's possible I misunderstood what you were saying. 1. Maybe we should establish what we respectively mean by "secular academics." I am referring academics who employ a naturalist method (the scientific method), one that is and has for hundreds of years been used by both atheists and theists alike. 2. See 1. 3. I didn't say "Methodological science," I said "Methodological naturalism." More importantly, what _evidence_ do you have besides your claims that the methodological, naturalist system we call "science" existed before the likes of Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo? (especially Galileo, who began the tradition of heavily weighing observation over reason)? Prior to them, "science" was mostly deductive. Modern science is _inductive,_ and when we say "science," it is modern science we are referring to. 4. I dispute that modern science came out of alchemy. If it came from any pseudoscience, it was _astrology_ (note that Kepler was an astrologist as well as an astronomer [and the line between them was blurred at the time], and both Galileo and Copernicus studied astrology). But that's not what made it modern science. Modern science ultimately owes its existence to the philosophical shift from pure deductive reason as a means to understand the world (Plato) to _inductive_ reasoning to understand the world (thanks in large part to Galileo). Alchemy was just the precursor to chemistry, and it was in fact the invention of modern _inductive_ science that eventually caused alchemy to be replaced by chemistry (and the same with astrology and astronomy). But I will say that alchemy was always in part inductive to begin with. It wasn't until the systematic naturalist methods pioneered by the likes of Galileo and Newton that all the extraneous aspects of alchemy were finally put to bed and modern chemistry birthed (notably, 1661 with Boyle). The major difference between the alchemy and chemistry is, of course, the scientific method - something which simply _did not exist_ as we know it until a few hundred years ago. Alchemy lived on for some time, if I'm not mistaken, but it didn't and still doesn't fit into what we would call a science (naturalistic, methodological, _inductive_ exploration and explanation of the world). Neither does astrology, which was slowly siphoned away out of astronomy. But, my point here is that the major birth-givers of science (which I argue are Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo) were more active in astronomy and astrology than alchemy and chemistry. 5. If it was wrong, my apologies. When someone complains about secular methodological inquiry, they are usually of the "god did it" camp. It was an assumption. 6. Natural theology cannot be a non-sequitur because natural theology is not part of an argument. It is neither a conclusion nor a statement of fact, nor a hypothesis, nor anything of the sort. It's just an _ideology_ influencing theology, one focused on proving religious truths by rational arguments and observation rather than revelation, so I'm not really sure what you mean here. What do you mean by "natural theology is a non-sequitur?"

@gipsi2001

2 жыл бұрын

@@eliteteamkiller319 his father could have been a Roman soldier ya know

@andreicazan1660

2 жыл бұрын

@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese welcome to Romania

I gotta say as a Christian and a huge history buff of biblical and early American history. I really love how you break down scripture with accordance with historical and cultural accuracy. This being said I challenge you to watch and perhaps review the historical, cultural and perhaps biblical accuracy of The Chosen why ? Because the writers and cast tries to bring in historical, cultural and biblical accuracy into the show and perhaps may intrigue you. Keep up the amazing work.

@chenoaholdstock3507

2 жыл бұрын

I think you have a gramatical error in there

@Benfiester

2 жыл бұрын

@@chenoaholdstock3507 Where?

@chenoaholdstock3507

2 жыл бұрын

@@Benfiester you say "break down the cultural and perhaps Biblical accuracy of The Chosen why?". I don't think that's what you meant.

@Benfiester

2 жыл бұрын

@The Dúnedain I don't everyone is guilty in grammer errors. From the physical appearance of Jesus I personally believe the Chosen's version of Christ is the most accurate in terms of historical and cultural context.

@Benfiester

2 жыл бұрын

@@chenoaholdstock3507 Why not add historical ?

I find this interesting. Thank you.

I always think you have great things to say and have great insights. Thanks for taking the time. A small correction for you if you are willing. Joshua the leader after Moses and Joshua the son of Nun are the same person. Time 6:13.

Judas kiss proves that Jesus looked similar to the other Galileans. OR perhaps, Jesus looked liked ONE of them, the apostle Thomas. The word "Thomas" means "twin". Maybe Thonas was a twin of some random guy; maybe his uncle was a twin and he was named after the uncle; maybe he just looked a bit like Jesus, so they called him "Twin" as a pune. Best of all consider Hercules and Iphicles; Zeus and Alcmene begat Herakles, Alcmene begat Iphicles with her own husband. Maybe Thomas is the son of Joseph and blessed virgin Mary.

@albatross1688

2 жыл бұрын

Or at least his disciples, who spent an inordinate amount of time around Jesus and may or may not have also adopted similar choices regarding their appearances. We really don't know. Obviously Jesus looked ethnically similar to other Galileans too, but in terms of other aspects of his appearance, there's just not enough data.

@lxfj2128

2 жыл бұрын

Yes regardless just say he did have a different hair colour the Roman officer wouldn’t know tbe difference anyway

@hliastasoulhs7897

2 жыл бұрын

It was night my friend.

@cyborgchicken3502

2 жыл бұрын

And Galileans probably looked like any regular person from the middle East....so if anything Jesus looked Middle Eastern either like a semite or Arab....I don't understand why it's so difficult for people to understand this, he was born and lived in the middle East....so if course he would've looked like people from there

@blackdove5940

2 жыл бұрын

Judas and Jesus tongue kissed so it proves they were french.

I just discovered your channel and I love, love, love it! So many in this world are not intellectual, much less intellectually honest. It's all about 'feelings' at this point and it's frustrating.

@gospel2596

2 жыл бұрын

King James Version: Job 30:30 Job said, “My skin is BLACK”, Songs of Solomon 1:5 “I am BLACK but comely( Beautiful)”. Acts 13:1 Barnabas and Simeone was called Niger (BLACK in Latin). Lucius of Cyrene (a city in Lybia, Northern Africa). Acts 21:37-38 the chief asked Paul if he was the Egyptian (Black man)that made an uproar.... Sampson had 7 locks, Judges 16:13, and only a black person can naturally grow 7 locks. Matthew 2:13 The angel told Joseph to take baby Jesus and Mary to hide in Egypt from Herod. If Jesus was a Caucasian, Northern Africa would have been the worst hiding spot. But because they were black just like the egyptians the angel told them to hide in egypt so that the prophesy would be fulfilled and that”Out of Egypt have I called my son.” Daniel 7:9 KJV the Ancient of days (God Almighty Jesus Christ) garment as white as snow, the hair of His head LIKE THE PURE WOOL (Black man’s hair texture) Rev 1:14 should read like Daniel 7:9 “the hair on his head were white, like wool, as white as snow. it would be impossible for Jesus to have a Caucasian face when the following verse 15 said his feet is black (Brass or brown burned into furnace could never be Caucasian). Daniel 10:6 says God’s colour is like polished brass(Black man colour). If you study hair genetics you would learn that wool hair is EXCLUSIVE to black people and if a Caucasian person have wool hair, it’s considered a disorder calls “wooly hair syndrome” and I’m certain Jesus didn’t have a disorder. Click on the following 4 minutes link of a Caucasian Jewish Rabbi who confirms that Blacks are original Jews. kzread.info/dash/bejne/oHVnuLRmg9jNoKw.html X94lmn

@santaclaus3737

2 жыл бұрын

He's not

@Angela-lb9zi

2 жыл бұрын

@@santaclaus3737 🤔

@gospel2596

2 жыл бұрын

@@santaclaus3737 I love your name, lol, lol, it matches your response. Santa Claus, it’s not what you or anybody thinks, not even me, but it’s what the word of God and ancient history says and according to the scriptures and history, Jesus Christ and the 12 tribes of Israel are BLACK, ok Santa!!!

@touratouratoura

Жыл бұрын

sounds like youre just socially inept mate

Another excellent video. Thank you for the hard work you put in. I know its 2years old

You have most likely been notified if the error in your video (17:35 time). The verse should be John 20:14 …”and knew NOT that it was Jesus.” BTW, absolutely love your channel. ❤

I have been watching your videos sometime, and i am a student of history, cultural ethnography and also theology and i must say that i have been astounded and drawn in by your ability to use these elements along with objectivity to elevate, inspire and educate. Too few of you in the world my wise one. Metatron, keep doing what you're doing.

@metatronyt

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much I appreciate your Kind words

@jayceazar1476

2 жыл бұрын

@@metatronyt absoloutly! Very informative and engaging to watch. I use your videos to educate and entertain at work.

@mgo1932

2 жыл бұрын

@@metatronyt Jesus is a fake

@mgo1932

2 жыл бұрын

B

@mitchellosmer1293

2 жыл бұрын

@John Wright Totaly lies-------out of context verses--and added scripture-----

I absolutely love the historical way you engage in these topics, as a secular autistic person I really love theology and the historicity of varying things in regards thereto.

@Unethical.Dodgson

2 жыл бұрын

@ThxGod It'sOver That's an oversimplification. Light genes date back hundreds of thousands of years. The darkest genes were only expressed more strongly much more recently through eastern humans migrating back into africa. Earliest humans that migrated out of africa carried many of the genes for light and dark skin tones. To claim that all humans were dark until white skin evolved as a mutation is a statement that shows lack of expertise on the subject.

@tammycroft6217

2 жыл бұрын

@@Unethical.Dodgson My understanding of this is that while the potential for both light and dark skin has always existed, anywhere more protection from the sun was needed dark skin slowly became the dominant color spectrum because of the need for melatonin in the skin. In other areas where dark skin was not needed, light skin slowly became the dominant color spectrum.

@bigguy7353

2 жыл бұрын

Good vocabulary, bad punctuation.

@glinteastwood

2 жыл бұрын

@@bigguy7353 Thank god you’re here to grade an autistic person’s casual writing in a KZread comments section.

@HufflepuffDaddy

2 жыл бұрын

@Richard L Jones that's silly. Humans would need more melanin in Equatorial regions (Africa or otherwise) because the Sun's radiation is stronger there and more dangerous to DNA. Melanin-production is a survival mechanism at the genetic level due to the environment. Do research on how melanin is protective against UVA/UVB radiation because you don't have a clue at all.

Where has this man been? I am transfixed by his information. I am hooked.

So what do you quote the writing of Josephus

Your research and presentation really are impeccable. I can honestly say I don't know of another channel which takes an academic subject apart so well, just a bit of pop-science or pop-academics which are basically a cursory, "science tells us". Love your analysing of the original language sources, the essential need for context, and the science to top it off. Just great! Love the appropriate costumes as well. Cool little bit of theatre to reinforce a point ^_^

@metatronyt

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much

@stevenclark5646

2 жыл бұрын

I'm a black man but I certainly don't believe that revelation 1is saying that he was black

@bobby12348

Жыл бұрын

@@stevenclark5646 He's Latino 😊

@levite2059

Жыл бұрын

A COMPLETE REFUTAL OF METATRON’S VIDEO: #1.He said nonbias but immediately after he stated that Jesus is not black and trying to refute rev 1. #2. He started to trace Jesus’s ethnicity from 2,000 years ago instead of going back to genesis or at least from Noah. #3. Then he said he’s going to start from a clean slate without any personal preferences and image expectation when not even a second before, he said that Jesus isn’t black like the Africans. He continues to say if Jesus is black, brown etc., it wouldn’t matter to him when he already build up an image in his mind what Jesus isn’t and who he wants Jesus to be, I believe that’s CONFIRMATION BIAS. Lol, lol, I really have to laugh because this racist, bias guy is funny. #4. He said the governing changed the image of Jesus Christ to look like them and not the governed. I couldn’t agree more with him on this one because that’s exactly why Jesus is not portrayed as his correct color, black, the governed. Caucasians governing and blacks are governed. #5. Nobody believes that Jesus was African, he was not a Canaanite or Kushite, He is a Hebrew Israelite. The problem is that you fail to realize that the biblical and historical Hebrew Israelites were black just like the Hamites. In Gen 42:7-8 Joseph ONLY changed his voice and his brothers didn’t recognize him but he recognized them. If Joseph was Caucasian he would have stand out amongst the other Egyptians but he was black just like the ancient Egyptians and that’s why he could change his voice and not being recognized by his brothers. In theology, there is a thing call “analogy of faith” where you compare scripture to scripture in order to arrive at a conclusion because all scriptures are harmoniously united and not contradictory. Therefore , In order to understand Revelations 1:14 you have to read Daniel 7:9 KJV the Ancient of days (God Almighty Jesus Christ) garment as white as snow, the hair of His head LIKE THE PURE WOOL (Black man’s hair texture). #6. Jesus looked different after his resurrection doesn’t mean that he didn’t have a body because he ate with the disciples after his resurrection. Him being God can cause them not to recognize him. #7. Like I said before, you can’t tell what Jesus looked like by only knowing what Galilean men in the first century looked like. If that’s the case I can just say Jesus was black like the men in Galilee at that time because all the Jews in Galilee were black.However, there were different ethnicities in Galilee at the time of Jesus. Also, how do we know that those men were actually from Galilee and not imposters from the governing. Just like how he said the Romans changed the image of Jesus, that’s the same way we cannot trust your so-called iconography, etc. It’s like saying, I can know what Martin L King looked like by looking at what men in Tennessee looked like in the 19th century. This is if I didn’t know what he looks like. #8. The gospels weren’t written in the first century, according to most theologians, 80% of the New Testament manuscript dated to the 5th century or later with the oldest, the single most authenticated fragment, papyrus 52, dated to the mid 2nd century. It wouldn’t make no sense for Judas to say Jesus looked like the black guy when Jesus Christ and the 12 tribes of Israel are all Black. lol, lol, this guy continues to make me laugh. You are confusing the way how people in that area looked today with the biblical and historical people in that area. Those coins doesn’t prove anything, how do you know that the person on the coin bending his knees were Jews? Did the coin say they were Jews or you assumed they were Jews? Also how do we know that those coins were from the first century for sure. The person kneeling down wasn’t even bowing down in front of the roman Soilder on the coin. Those so call pictures of Jews in the temple was painted by the governing Caucasian and not the governed blacks (Jews). #9. You are using proof from a modern day Caucasian Israeli biohistorian, it’s like the police investigating themselves, what a joke, no independence. Jesus looked nothing like the modern day Iraqi, he was an Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah. The modern day people in that region are hybrid , mixture of the original inhabitants of the land (blacks) and Caucasian Romans, Greeks and Arabs due to the invasions. That land is the biblical Canaan, promised land. Canaan father is Cush/Ethiopia (burn face, black face people), Ham means Hot and a word means BLACK. Abraham’s grandfather and brother both named Nahor, descendant of Shem comes from the Hebrew root word “Harar”which also means burn, Charred or Hot for Black. That’s why Nahor is a slang for Nigger. Acts 13:1 KJV version: Barnabas and Simeon was also called Niger (BLACK in Greek and Latin). Songs of Solomon 1:5 “I am BLACK but comely (beautiful)”, Job 30:30 Job said “My skin is BLACK”. Daniel 7:9 said the Ancient of days, Jesus Christ which is the same Alpha and Omega in Rev chapter 1, His hair is as “PURE WOOL” and if you study hair genetics, you would learned that wool hair is EXCLUSIVE to BLACK people and if a Caucasian person have wool hair it’s considered a disorder calls “wooly hair syndrome” and I’m certain Jesus Christ didn’t have a disorder. Please see below for a reference to the name NAHOR from naming.net www.nameaning.net/both/Nahor Cush or Ethiopia had a son name Nimrod who’s kingdom was Babel/Babylon or Chaldea Chaldeans , Gen 10:8-12, so the Chaldeans/Babylonians were also black like their father and Granfather Nimrod and Ethiopia respectively. And guess what, Abraham was BORN in Ur of Chaldea/Babylon. So we can conclude again that Abraham was an Ethiopian Hebrew , Genesis 14:13. Judean men in biblical times were black like there ancestors, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob according to scriptures and ancient history. Therefore we can conclude that metatron research and description is highly flawed, biased and racist. I chose to believe what the scriptures says over what man says!!!

@EdenSophia118

Жыл бұрын

@@stevenclark5646 There is another scripture in Revelations where John said he had the appearance of a SARDIUS STONE.

I really appreciate all of the effort put into accessing all of the data, and that you weren't afraid to leave the conclusion at "this is what he likely looked like, but it's not definite". Not many people have the courage to admit they do not have definite answers to complex questions.

Hey are u Greek by any chance? Your accent reminds me of mine lol

Metatron what do think of Putin's recent reveal or the unlocking of the vault. I think you should review this subject

@StonesSticksBones

24 күн бұрын

There was no vault & Putin did not open anything, it was a pretty standard art exhibition with a dishonest voiceover/caption

@bencancio914

11 күн бұрын

​@@StonesSticksBones is that true ? You have blacks all over youtube saying they knew Jesus was black ..

@StonesSticksBones

11 күн бұрын

@@bencancio914 yep, it was literally his 2023 New Year's address (that didn't even mention Jesus or anything religious) dubbed over & with some clips from a 2009 Orthodox art exhibition Welcome to the wacky world of wewuzzery......

As a Black man and member of the Body of Hamashiach, I found your video very honest having no racial bias at all. I appreciate the academic effort as well. Thank you!

@frank1fm634

2 жыл бұрын

revbq so where does "racial bias" have to do with how Jesus looked.So you've never seen what Jesus looked like?All you have to do is type in "image on Shroud of Turin" here on youtube.You can see all the images you want of Jesus,His face and torso front and back.This was the burial shroud Jesus after His death.The image was formed due to a radiant burst of light when Jesus was resurrectied from the dead after three days.There are even full 3D statues of Jesus made from the image on the Shroud.

@revbq

2 жыл бұрын

@@frank1fm634 I'm sorry but how are we to really know that the shroud is even real. What proof is there that Yehoshua was ever wrapped in it? How many historians have actually verified it as fact? I'll check out whatever sources are out there. I mentioned racial bias because this person always gets accused of being racist that's all.

@TheRossillini

2 жыл бұрын

@@revbq it’s been dated about 3,000 years ago and they had no technology to produce such an image on the cloth. The shroud is pretty legit honestly.

@kushtaseti4336

2 жыл бұрын

You are not black 😂

@revbq

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheRossilliniThanks for the reply but if it was dated 3000 years ago it proves it cannot be Christ correct? That would predate every one in Yeshua's time by a 1000yrs.

Very well laid out and thought provoking presentation. Great job, keep it coming.

@levite2059

Жыл бұрын

#1.He said nonbias but immediately after he stated that Jesus is not black and trying to refute rev 1. #2. He started to trace Jesus’s ethnicity from 2,000 years ago instead of going back to genesis or at least from Noah. #3. Then he said he’s going to start from a clean slate without any personal preferences and image expectation when not even a second before, he said that Jesus isn’t black like the Africans. He continues to say if Jesus is black, brown etc., it wouldn’t matter to him when he already build up an image in his mind what Jesus isn’t and who he wants Jesus to be, I believe that’s CONFIRMATION BIAS. Lol, lol, I really have to laugh because this racist, bias guy is funny. #4. He said the governing changed the image of Jesus Christ to look like them and not the governed. I couldn’t agree more with him on this one because that’s exactly why Jesus is not portrayed as his correct color, black, the governed. Caucasians governing and blacks are governed. #5. Nobody believes that Jesus was African, he was not a Canaanite or Kushite, He is a Hebrew Israelite. The problem is that you fail to realize that the biblical and historical Hebrew Israelites were black just like the Hamites. In Gen 42:7-8 Joseph ONLY changed his voice and his brothers didn’t recognize him but he recognized them. If Joseph was Caucasian he would have stand out amongst the other Egyptians but he was black just like the ancient Egyptians and that’s why he could change his voice and not being recognized by his brothers. In theology, there is a thing call “analogy of faith” where you compare scripture to scripture in order to arrive at a conclusion because all scriptures are harmoniously united and not contradictory. Therefore , In order to understand Revelations 1:14 you have to read Daniel 7:9 KJV the Ancient of days (God Almighty Jesus Christ) garment as white as snow, the hair of His head LIKE THE PURE WOOL (Black man’s hair texture). #6. Jesus looked different after his resurrection doesn’t mean that he didn’t have a body because he ate with the disciples after his resurrection. Him being God can cause them not to recognize him. #7. Like I said before, you can’t tell what Jesus looked like by only knowing what Galilean men in the first century looked like. If that’s the case I can just say Jesus was black like the men in Galilee at that time because all the Jews in Galilee were black.However, there were different ethnicities in Galilee at the time of Jesus. Also, how do we know that those men were actually from Galilee and not imposters from the governing. Just like how he said the Romans changed the image of Jesus, that’s the same way we cannot trust your so-called iconography, etc. It’s like saying, I can know what Martin L King looked like by looking at what men in Tennessee looked like in the 19th century. This is if I didn’t know what he looks like. #8. The gospels weren’t written in the first century, according to most theologians, 80% of the New Testament manuscript dated to the 5th century or later with the oldest, the single most authenticated fragment, papyrus 52, dated to the mid 2nd century. It wouldn’t make no sense for Judas to say Jesus looked like the black guy when Jesus Christ and the 12 tribes of Israel are all Black. lol, lol, this guy continues to make me laugh. You are confusing the way how people in that area looked today with the biblical and historical people in that area. Those coins doesn’t prove anything, how do you know that the person on the coin bending his knees were Jews? Did the coin say they were Jews or you assumed they were Jews? Also how do we know that those coins were from the first century for sure. The person kneeling down wasn’t even bowing down in front of the roman Soilder on the coin. Those so call pictures of Jews in the temple was painted by the governing Caucasian and not the governed blacks (Jews). #9. You are using proof from a modern day Caucasian Israeli biohistorian, it’s like the police investigating themselves, what a joke, no independence. Jesus looked nothing like the modern day Iraqi, he was an Hebrew Israelite from the tribe of Judah. The modern day people in that region are hybrid , mixture of the original inhabitants of the land (blacks) and Caucasian Romans, Greeks and Arabs due to the invasions. That land is the biblical Canaan, promised land. Canaan father is Cush/Ethiopia (burn face, black face people), Ham means Hot and a word means BLACK. Abraham’s grandfather and brother both named Nahor, descendant of Shem comes from the Hebrew root word “Harar”which also means burn, Charred or Hot for Black. That’s why Nahor is a slang for Nigger. Acts 13:1 KJV version: Barnabas and Simeon was also called Niger (BLACK in Greek and Latin). Songs of Solomon 1:5 “I am BLACK but comely (beautiful)”, Job 30:30 Job said “My skin is BLACK”. Daniel 7:9 said the Ancient of days, Jesus Christ which is the same Alpha and Omega in Rev chapter 1, His hair is as “PURE WOOL” and if you study hair genetics, you would learned that wool hair is EXCLUSIVE to BLACK people and if a Caucasian person have wool hair it’s considered a disorder calls “wooly hair syndrome” and I’m certain Jesus Christ didn’t have a disorder. Please see below for a reference to the name NAHOR from naming.net www.nameaning.net/both/Nahor Cush or Ethiopia had a son name Nimrod who’s kingdom was Babel/Babylon or Chaldea Chaldeans , Gen 10:8-12, so the Chaldeans/Babylonians were also black like their father and Granfather Nimrod and Ethiopia respectively. And guess what, Abraham was BORN in Ur of Chaldea/Babylon. So we can conclude again that Abraham was an Ethiopian Hebrew , Genesis 14:13. Judean men in biblical times were black like there ancestors, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob according to scriptures and ancient history. Therefore we can conclude that metatron research and description is highly flawed, biased and racist. I chose to believe what the scriptures says over what man says!!!

@theuveal8234

Жыл бұрын

@@levite2059 The ONLY people that have ever depicted Jesus as a black man (during the first/second centuries) were the Ethiopians, way down in Sub-Saharan Africa. How is this different from white peoples depicting him as white? And people like you always say how black people were always the governed without even acknowledging kingdoms like Aksum and Numidia or empires like Ghana or Mali. Yes you are 100% correct.....

@raesjourney1160

Жыл бұрын

@@levite2059they don’t want to hear! It’s very understood theirs no way a white man would exist without black. They are of us but not really.

Thanks for your thoughts. All good thoughts about Jesus make me good.

I saw in another video that talked about a letter Pilate wrote to Ceasar about Jesus, that Pilate had seen a young man with golden hair, golden beard, and blue eyes leaning against a tree as he preached to a crowd. Pilate asked who the young man was, and someone told Pilate that the young man was Jesus of Nazareth. But the narrator also said he wasn't sure how reliable the letter actually was. But I found that bit if information interesting.

Your effort in the presentation is amazing. Well researched. Thank you

I feel your pain, I'll often have to hand translate shit from novels because people take meaning purely from the English words and try to argue from its potential implications. It's even funnier when they don't speak the language at all and try to correct me.

@moonman2051

2 жыл бұрын

Why do you care, though?

@woaddragon

2 жыл бұрын

@@moonman2051 Dont mind me. Just "Lost in translation"

@GuitarsRockForever

2 жыл бұрын

@@moonman2051 Because it is important to understand the writing as exactly what the writer meant? Often with translated work, some meaning would be lost. You have to understand the original language to truly know the meaning of the work.

@moonman2051

2 жыл бұрын

@@GuitarsRockForever One thing is to argue, another thing is to do it often. That's a massive waste of time, and it only brings misery.

@LadyThunderbird63

2 жыл бұрын

Good example of that is the claim that Sir Ralph De Ashton, The black Knight of Lancashire was black and is being claimed as proof that all our aristocracy is really black. Not understanding how language was used at that time (1400s) . And it wasn't a description of his skin color but his black armour and as he was a very cruel man , with a black heart . They just see the word black and grab on to it with no idea of the context .

It's a pitfall of our nature in the flesh to want to know what he looked like, to become attached to an image (most of us Christians do) but this is really bringing God down to human standards, my favorite portion and the most insightful imo, was the totally true point that scripture tells us he appeared in a totally different image after his resurrection, John's vision is good because it emphasizes Jesus outside of human limitations, and he apparedto his disciplines as simply totally new human forms. God is above us.

First, thanks for the interesting explanation of the topic Secondly, as a Muslim, we have a hadith about the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, that he saw Jesus in the sky and described him as follows: Square in stature - that is, neither tall nor short. - His skin color tends to be red. - Broad-chested. - The hair is loose - that is, the hair is loose - as if his head was dripping and no wetness had reached it.

Thanks for the well research video. As a Christian, I’ve researched most of the stuff myself quite a bit and came to almost exactly the same conclusion. And I don’t bring that up as confirmation bias as an interesting fact that this is one of your first videos, I ever listen to, and that two people for me greatly different backgrounds, can still come to the same conclusion when researching what documents their art to look at.

@spacewater7

11 ай бұрын

Agreed, and I'd love to share the video with a certain pastor of a certain church I was attending once. The pastor went on a sermon about how Jesus had short hair and never drank alcohol of any kind - on and on grasping at scriptures (straws) for half an hour - and I'm just sitting there stewing in silence trying my best not to say anything. Oh and I should've mentioned that half the women present had extremely short hair, just like all of the men, with the exception of the pastor's son whose hair is maybe 6 inches long. Oh and then there's me, and I haven't even trimmed my hair in a decade...

@AshleyLebedev

8 ай бұрын

@@spacewater7why not share?

It is so refreshing to hear a calm, honest analysis of these subjects. Fantastic job, and thanks for working so hard on this!

Where are you getting the names Yeshua? Isn't that modern Hebrew? From what I understand they didn't speak that at that time. Do you have a video on this? Thanks, I enjoy your channel.

* I like the way he transitioned to Jesus may look-alike even the wardrobe haha so funny 🤣😂