I think the safest approach is to not bother with it until you're going to finally study it. Allah does not task us with perfectly refining how to interpret His attributes. Rather our task is to worship and obey Him and stay away from harming ourselves and others with our tongues, our hands, etc. If learning about Allah causes us to curse each other, then we have not understood anything at all.

@fifafreebies8941

2 жыл бұрын

---Allah is One (Allah is the ONLY Creator and is not composed of parts, pieces, or dimensions) ---Allah existed before the creations and there was NOTHING ELSE in existence (no light, darkness, time, space, distance, or direction) ---Allah ABSOLUTELY does not need the creations (hence, Allah does not require space in order to exist) ---Allah ABSOLUTELY does not resemble the creations (hence, Allah is not attributed with bodily or spatial characteristics--like, size, shape, form, organs, limbs, motion, stillness, etc.) If a person does not understand these principles, then there can be no coherent discussion about what does and does not befit the Creator.

@aukasajalad561

Жыл бұрын

true

@Nazeem_6621

Жыл бұрын

Well said

@MrGadoozle

Жыл бұрын

well said.

@nexusanphans3813

10 ай бұрын

@@fifafreebies8941 Allah does not need nor resemble any creation, but when He described himself with something, we affirm it and accept it, without questioning its reality, or equating it with the attributes of creations.

Maa shaa Allaah, this is one of the most important talks I have heard in a long time. Baarak Allaahu feek, Shaykh Yasir

Yasir Qadhi always answers the most difficult questions and that's why I love him so much.

@maryamshakeel4027

2 жыл бұрын

How to ask him a question

@pocophone2010

Жыл бұрын

The problem is that he is not wahhabiyah najdiyah anymore

@IsmetPeci1

8 ай бұрын

@@pocophone2010is that a problem? Rather he has left the fold of islam.. speaking kufr and having doubts in the preservation of quran.

@faysalahmed9157

7 ай бұрын

​@@IsmetPeci1Please verify truth, before your speak. He has clarified numerous time please see his explanation after this there will be no excuse to spreading this lies.

@dr.daigoroitto991

6 ай бұрын

​@@maryamshakeel4027flying to Texas

Excellent approach in explaining the Ashari and Salafi thought. Righteous people will always want to unite lay people together. As we get older wisdom teaches you that we are all believers and we accept differences. May Allah guide us all to the truth. Ameen.

@mohithegreat7912

2 жыл бұрын

Ameen

6:16 Concept of Iman 8:45 Importance of *proving* the existence of Allah 12:59 Allah's attributes

After being Muslim now for 9 years i have come to see that many Muslims have a blind belief. They believe just what they have been instructed to, but their minds are closed to any new information. I also used to be very judgemental and wonder why other Muslims are doing incorrect things, but when we focus on our own status with Allah it humbles us and allows compassion to take a front seat. I now have no isses at all talking with Muslims and non Muslims about faith and sharing view points. As soon as we close off a path to knowledge, we close off something in ourselves, and we never know where that knowledge will come from.

@Soulkollextor

3 жыл бұрын

Have to ask ourselves are we ready to embrace all types of knowledge without affecting our aqeedah and eliminate doubts?

@amssaid9583

3 жыл бұрын

But see brother in Islam we have the Quran n the sunnah.... n for the most part they’re enough IAllah. also in Islam we don’t have strange foreign thoughts, thoughts like trinity So, for the most part Islam is straight forward.... For that reason muslims don’t investigate a lot We r really settled with our faith.

@ibrahimyilmaz4861

3 жыл бұрын

Taqleed in Fiqh is a controversial topic but in fact taqleed in kelam/in what you believe in is HARAM. One can't just be Muslim because his parents were. He must, this is an obligation, get knowledge and believe with full heart

@salampakistan3691

3 жыл бұрын

@@ibrahimyilmaz4861 You do know we are all muslims from birth, but parents take us away if christian, athiest or other faiths. Children accept Islam from parents because they like the explanation, there is no nagging doubt etc that other children suffer with their parents explanations. Because islamic explanations is satisfying unlike other faiths or non faiths. Islam always made sense to me since I was a kid. Its not blind faith, I opened the Quran and loved it♥️

@ibrahimyilmaz4861

3 жыл бұрын

@@salampakistan3691 Bro in what you are saying you are a 100% right but you didnt understand what i was saying. There are two kinds of Taqleed (blind following). One of them is Taqleed in Fiqh (jurispudence, what and how to do for example where to place the hands in salah) and the second is Taqleed in Aqeeda (Aqeeda is what you believe). It is mandatory for all Muslims to follow blindly in Fiqh, so ie Hanafis put their hands below the belly naval without knowing a hadith or something for it. It is not need. But you cant just be Muslim because you were born that way. You need to understand what you are believing in. You cant just say yes im Muslim because my ancestors. You need to know that Islam is 100% and must be the only right religion as it says in the Quran. These are two different things

So much knowledge that it is worthy of a replay. It gets the mind to think about what it truly believes or is missing. I take it as a challenge, as inspiration. From the beginning my mind was, that I didn’t want to lean toward any group and don’t want to listen, so everyone, stop trying to choose a “school of thought”. For there are friends who become like an enemy when not to except their hate of prominent mainstream speakers who are beloved I believe that there is good and not so good in everyone so that we can learn from each other. So I listen with intent not to bear off onto a strange road. When one becomes as rigid as a tree they don’t bend and become uprooted and hostile, blaming it on the wind, instead of its own short growth of roots. It’s a great feeling not to be locked into a label, condemning others, becoming arrogant , and harmful to themselves as well as others.

I’ve been looking for someone to properly explain the basics of some of the common practised schools of thought, this is the perfect introduction, jazakhallah khair

JazakAllah kheir for this. Can you please make a series on it? It would be very beneficial. Love you for the sake of Allah swt, Sheikh.

Another soul inspiring, mind tranquilising rendition. Jazakum Llahu khaeran yaa sheikh

Jazzaka Allah Kheir Sheikh Dr. Qadhi... The most important message is the need for Unity, our enemies are many and we will continue to be weak if we don't Unite. Allahuma Musta'an

Beautiful said!!! Ma shaa Allah... Sh YQ has so much wisdom.

Great explanation and conclusion. Much appreciated

JazakAllahu khayran Shaykhna Very beneficial advise for all

👏🏾 Maa shaa Allah he explained each group better than 90% of the followers of each group can explain it themselves. I think the real reason people argue is because they don’t really even understand the opinions or scholars they claim to follow. We don’t have to agree with everything YQ says, but when he’s on-point he’s 🎯 💯 May Allah accept from all of us and give us sincerity.

Wow, it's an amazing explanation of their differences. Enlightening. Thank you.

Thank you for this summarised answer.

Jazakallah khairan for the explanation, Shaikh. May Allah bless you

Jzk, great explanation 😊

Thank you for the wisdom. AlhamduLILLAH ❤️

Mashallah.good to see you talking about unity. Welcome back

Since the very beginning we have interpreted various controversies and things, even within sunnism their r various trends and they r two slightly different theologies within sunnism (invented within first 100 years after the death of prophet pbuh) (they viewed the sunnah of the prophet important BUT Shia has an imam that interpret the law, they have a living imam, Sunni community has a respect of sahabah, pre-destination (no ultimate free will), gathered around the legitimate caliphate, etc.…) As time developed various theologians came and finer details were answered. Both of these terms are contested. Salafism (Hambali Theology, Atharism). Ash’arism goes back to an individual Abu al Hassan ashari, first to develop a systematic ideology. They go back to early Islam and they both are in some way’s rivalry to each other. Intro: 1) Concept of Iman: Ash’arism: Iman is affirmation of the heart, if u believe than u have Iman, it is to affirm in your heart. Iman itself does not increase or decrease because they have it as on or off. No middle ground. Salafism: Iman is that which exist in heart and it is to affirm as previously mentioned and also to act upon it. Iman increases and decreases. Actual term applies to actions as well, it is within the term Iman. 2) Importance and methodology of proving the existing of Allah: Ash’arism: The Kalam cosmological argument.it goes back to Aristotle, from Mutazilites also. It relies on that world contains bodies and bodies have attributes and accident (that is within the body) is a color, size etc. Accidents must be created so body is created so someone created the body. Salafism: Existence of God does not require proof, to deny it is to deny things that r self-evident. This mechanism of proving god is problematic it leads to collaries that are problematic 3) Concept of Allah’s attributes: The face of your lord shall remain, created Adam with both hands, your lord will come on the day of judgement, our lord comes down in the last third of the night. Ash’arism: We will take only 7 attributes without any how (Life knowledge, hear, seeing, speech, will, power), however other attributes cannot be affirmed, like motion. Your lord has risen, your lord comes down, so they say Allah didn’t intend the literal meaning because motion is an accident which has to occur in a body and bodies are created then it implies that Allah is a body which shoes Allah is created. Hand and face are human like, so all of this is metaphorical. a) You block out linguistic meaning. b) It becomes metaphorical, basically they’re interpret it. Salafism: If Allah says it Allah knows best, we do not think how, we leave it to Allah.U negate the “howness”. The words r understood but not how. a) Believe in linguistic meaning Where is Allah is debate between them?? 1. The debate is infinite, it has occupied the theologians for 12 centuries. 2. Salafi: ibn al qayam, imam ahmad bin Hambal, Ibn Taymiyah 3. Ash’arism: Imam Al Ghazali. 4. All of it is classical Ash’arism & Salafism. The Salafi has been associated with the Hanbali madhab. The Maliki and Sha’a’fi went towards Ash’arism. 5. Maturidism (Hanafi School) and Ash’arism are very close. Sister Schools. 6. Various understandings of Tasawuf?? 7. E.g., Barelvi and Deobandi movement are under Maturudi Hanafi movement. 8. Celebrating of Mawlid (Ash’arism & Salafism) Similarities are far more than differences and believe in the 6 pillar of Islam, same books of fiqh, same curriculum for fiqh, believe in the Quran & Hadith as the primary source. They have never divided themselves on the masjids. The tensions have been at an academic level. YQ ADVICE: • The average Muslim is unaware of these differences and does not affect the Muslim in their lives. • We should not make a great deal out of them • Do not deaminize the other side, there is Iman and taqwa and nifaq on both sides. • Piety transcends these things.

@ayasahamed9048

3 жыл бұрын

Jazakallah khair

@SamSam-mv6gf

3 жыл бұрын

Jazak Allah Khair. We should aim to unit ummah and forget about small differences. I found ibadhi school the oldest to be the most respected school on this regard. Very well balanced school and their arguments always have the strongest dalil. Their school never fostered extremists. Their scholars are not well known. But they are the most knowledgeable people of Islam

@halazeel776

3 жыл бұрын

@@SamSam-mv6gf correct if im wrong but dont they say a person who commits a kabeerah is not muslim ?

@SamSam-mv6gf

3 жыл бұрын

@@halazeel776 thank you. Ibadhi get their fiqh and ahkam with evidence and dalil. Who committed kabirah is regarded Muslim and buried on Muslims grave. But they said he is Kafir kofr naimah. It means he is kafir of Allah blessing. Their evidence is from Quran 27:40 " So when Solomon saw it placed before him, he exclaimed, “This is by the grace of my Lord to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful. And whoever is grateful, it is only for their own good. But whoever is ungrateful, surely my Lord is Self-Sufficient, Most Generous.” the opposite of Shokr or being grateful is Kofr or being ungrateful. Ibadhi fiqh is the most ultimate highest and of the most in depth when it comes to evidences

@elmazielmazi6203

3 жыл бұрын

@@SamSam-mv6gf are they not also from the descendants of the khawarij. Those that killed Uthman ra. and basically started a whole fitnah.

Much needed video, job well done mashaAllah

MashaAllah sheikh this is very clear explanation, jazakallahu khairan ❤️

BarakAllahou fik for this answer ya shaykh

Excellent explanation Allah preserve you.

One of best lecture.

JazakAllah Khairan Shaykh

This just opened up my mind on the acceptence of diferent groups and opinions.....because they are still all muslim ....and insha allah allah will reward each soul fpr what it has earned

The kalam The contingency The fitrah The design The fine tuning The existence of immaterial things

Great explanation.

👍 good neutral talk explaining the basics, sadly now days people are calling their brothers and sisters, deviants and misguided

IVE LEARNED SOOOOO MUCH LISTENING TO Dr YASIR, May Allah BLESS Him Insha’Allah 🙏🏾

This is how blissful of humbleness and knowledgeable looks like. Alhamdullia

🔴 When Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) was asked of his opinion of the one who says i do not know whether Allaah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens or on the earth, Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) said: He has disbelieved, because Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) seven heavens. He was then asked, what if he said that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth he said, he has disbelieved. because he has denied that He (subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens [Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh»Dhahabi, also in Sharh Aqeedah At»Tahawiyyah of Ibn Abi AI-lzz AI»Hanafi] 🔴 lmaam Malik (Rahimahullah) said when replying to the one who asked, ‘How did Allah make lstawaa? (Ascension above the Throne), Al-lstawaa is Known, and its how is unknown, to have faith in it is obligatory, and to question it is an innovation.” Then he said to the questioner, “i do not think except that you are an innovator” and he ordered him to be expelled. [Quoted in AI-Asmaa was Sifaat’ Page #.516] 🔴 Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said: The belief that I am upon, and I saw Our Companions, the Ashab-ul- Hadith (People of hadith) - like Imaam Malik and Sufvan and others - to be upon is: Affirming the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) and that Muhammad (Sal-Allahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) is the Messenger of Allah. And that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His Throne. above His heaven. He comes close to His creation howsoever He Wills, and He (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Descends to the lowest heaven howsoever He Wills. [Quoted in ‘Awn aI-Ma’bood’ (13/41), and ibn Abu Ya’la reports it in ‘Tabaqaat aI»Hanaabilaa‘ (1/283) with a chain of narration linked back to lmaam Ash-Shafi’ee.) Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said on another occasion: “To Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) belong Names and Attributes that occur in His Book and His Prophet informed to the nation. It is not possible for anyone to refute (radd) them. So the one who contradicts this after the evidence has been established against him then he is a kafir (disbeliever), and as for before the establishment of the proof then he is excused due to ignorance, because the knowledge of that cannot be attained through the intellect. So we affirm these Attributes and we negate tashbeeh (likening Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) to creation) as Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) negated it by saying, ‘there is nothing like Him.”‘ [Quoted in ‘Siyar A’Iaam an-Nubalaa’ (10/80)] 🔴 lmaam Ahmad (Rahimahullah) was asked: “Allah is above the seventh heaven, above His Throne. distinct from his creation, and His Power and Knowledge are in every place?” He (Rahimahullah) replied: Yes. above the Throne and His Knowledge is in every place (Quoted in Sharh Usool ilal‘tiqaad]

Thats why i love our scholars all of them...❤ Either they are athari or asha'ari... They both sunnis .... Thank you ya Allah for having scholars like dr. Yasir qadhi who teaches us to respect all our brothers.

Assalam Aleikum Shaykh. At around minute 7 you said that the Ashaaira believe that imaan doesn't increase. The Ashaari's believe contrary to that, it is the maturidis who say it doesn't increase and decrease, this being one of the difference between the school. JazakAllah Khayr Shaykh for your time and great wealth of knowledge.

@bittertruth6575

3 жыл бұрын

Also at 19.01 Dr YQ says that the Asharis say "There is no actual Throne". This is incorrect. There IS DEFINITELY a Throne but Allaah does not sit on it, nor is He just 'above' it. The Throne is the largest creation of Allaah and it was created to signify His Majesty & Dominion over everything, since it is bigger and 'above' all of His other creation. However, it is still a creation of Allaah and finite and therefore occupies a certain amount of place. Allaah SWT, on the other hand, is BEYOND BEING BOUND BY SPACE OR PLACE.

@ahmads5889

3 жыл бұрын

@@bittertruth6575 The Qur'an: الرحمن على العرش ٱستوى The Narrations: "أين الله؟ في السماء" Explained in Bukhari: ٱستوى أي: علا و ٱرتفع kalamis: we don't believe in any of that. Ofcourse the kalamis think that the Allah Azzawajal and the Prophet Sallahu Alaihi wa Sallam did not explain the Deen to us in clear terms and thus they have to come up with their far-fetched Taweelat NaoudhubIllah min Dhalik.

@bittertruth6575

3 жыл бұрын

​@@ahmads5889 And the literalists became anthropomorphists because they assigned a body and place to Allaah. La hawla wa la quwata illah billah! i won't bother going any further since this is a very very delicate topic with complex ideas and I feel it is safer for both of us to stop here. However I will leave you with this ayah: "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing." Surah 42 verse 11: and this video (please turn on subtitles if you don't understand arabic): kzread.info/dash/bejne/dXWglMSaobuYcZs.html

@ahmads5889

3 жыл бұрын

@@bittertruth6575 OudhubIllah, look at the shamelessness, I literally quoted texts and didn't even give an interpretation, yet you start crying anthrophromism. Subhan Allah.

@bittertruth6575

3 жыл бұрын

​@@ahmads5889I make it a point not to argue about these points. Salaam.

May Allah unite the ummah ameen

May ALLAH (reward) immensely

May Allah subhana wa ta'ala guide &unite us all to concentrate on sirate mustaqeem so v could achieve hasana fid dunya wal a'akhira.

Thank you Sheikh.

Assalamu Alaikum Shaykh. Is there any book from where I can learn the details of all the Holy names of Allah Ajwajjal (Asmaul Husna)? Jazakallahu Khairan.

@aleemriaz709

3 жыл бұрын

Al Aqeedatul Wasatiyyah by Ibne Tayyimiah

@001khokhar

3 жыл бұрын

sunnahmuakada.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/al-ghazali-theninety-ninebeautifulnamesofgod.pdf

@ant-hw9os

3 жыл бұрын

www.farhathashmi.com/english-section/aqeedah/?giml-id=766 Names of Allah by Sister Taymiyyah Zubair (daughter of Dr. Farhat Hashmi) - these are audio lessons though, not written

Ashari's and I believe Matrudis believe you can't place a limit / boundary / restrictions on Allah SWT when we are talking about "where" Allah SWT is. Which makes sense. Us humans are unable to comprehend this, Allah SWT is beyond our understanding and comprehension.

@anoniem012

Жыл бұрын

We don't use emotion to know where Allah is, if Quran & Sunnah says He is above then He is. You have no evidence from Quran except general statements. Also our Fitrah agrees with Allah being above everything.

@zakali92

Жыл бұрын

No one is using emotion. It's simple rationality, we can't place any type of limits (location, distance, time, space etc) on our divine creator. Allah SWT is nothing like it's creation as it says in the Surah Ikhlaas, verse 4: "And there is none comparable to Him." Allah جل جلاله reveals again in the Qur’an Al Kareem, in the Surah Ash-Shura (Chapter 42, Verse 11): “There is absolutely nothing like him" (Allah جل جلاله )

@inspiringmuslim

Ай бұрын

ASSALAMUALAIKUM but AllahSubhanahuwa Ta'Ala is above Arsh right?@@zakali92

Wowww!!! Very interesting. I never ever heard of this . Subhan Allah

25:50 Just say that even though salafism is considered as a sect among ahlul sunnah we both are close to each other and have more similarities.

As ashaari myself, we understood the two positions within mazhab of takweel and tafweedh, both have the same conclusion denying any type of similarities between Allah and Makhluq may it on the different build or cells or even having requirements to the limbs, place and time. If outward (zahir ma'na) meaning of mutashaabihaat ayaats taken then somehow there will be tanaqudh (contradiction) within the Quran itself of which it is impossible. Such as, if yad and Wajh are literally taken as part of components of Allah's Zat (Self), then Quran also explains that the Yad shall be perish and only Wajh remains in surah Arrahman (Kullu man alaiha faan, was yabqa wajhubrobbika..).Any sane Muslim will not believe that any of Allah parts shall perish. This type of technical and logic argument is present in Kalam theology to avoid misunderstanding of aqeedah.

Love sheikh, may Allah grant him Jannah and forgive his wrongdoings.

The call to action part rings some of Syaikh Al-Banna's usool 20s.. Nice summary, tho..

love it how he explaine,Ma sha Allah

That was a great non bias explanation, even though you follow the Athari school.

I'm kinda hanifi but the rational answer by him is really appreciable. May allah increase him in knowledge and piety.

Masha Allah

In Indonesia in the past thirty yrs a new movement kept preaching and calling out the majority practices as bidah. This ideology stirrs up many communities especially with their online presence. I just hope that they preach more unity instead of refuting other practices.

JazakumAllahu Khair ya Sheikh, let the haters hate well done. However, I believe you have made even though not very significant, two mistakes concerning Iman in Sharism. Asharis do say that it is highly recommended to state the belief and make it public, however, they say for God it is sufficient faith in the heart. Some Ashari scholars have said it is obligatory to state the faith in public, Abu Hanifa states explicitly this in the fiqh al akbar. Secondly, Ashari's do not say faith is static, that is what the Maturidis say, while yaqeen increases and decreases as this is the opinion of Imam Abu Hanifa. Asharis absolutely say that Iman increases and decreases, as opposed to Maturidis. I am surprised you made this mistake, you obviously mixed the Maturidi position with the Ashari position. However, your message of unity is well taken. God Bless you!

مَاشَآءَاللّهُ

Wow. I can see how both are valid. Wow.

I am seeing a pattern of the scholars who after experience and get older - they tend to become unifying between sects and stop demonizing the other ideologies. May Allah guide us.

Salamo aleykom, how can we send questions to Shaykh Yasir Qadhi ?

@salmanmuslehuddin4078

3 жыл бұрын

askyq@epic.org

Could you comment on the Ibadi school of thought, please?

Maa Shaa Allah. thank you for this sheikh Yasir qadhi. you are right at some point in your life,You are going to choose. and i am leaning towards Salafi but I never think ill of the Ash ari.

just great explanation.....jazakallahu khair

Please do more on aqeedaa sheikh. We need to learn. Jazalla Allahu ghaira aljazaa

Salams shaykh. What school of fiqh do you practice?

@fifafreebies8941

2 жыл бұрын

---Allah is One (Allah is the ONLY Creator and is not composed of parts, pieces, or dimensions) ---Allah existed before the creations and there was NOTHING ELSE in existence (no light, darkness, time, space, distance, or direction) ---Allah ABSOLUTELY does not need the creations (hence, Allah does not require space in order to exist) ---Allah ABSOLUTELY does not resemble the creations (hence, Allah is not attributed with bodily or spatial characteristics--like, size, shape, form, organs, limbs, motion, stillness, etc.) If a person does not understand these principles, then there can be no coherent discussion about what does and does not befit the Creator.

Masyallah. Thank you for this beautiful lecture. Now, can someone do an infogrpahics or visual summary of this please? =D

There is an Ahairah da'eh in Philippines who says that it is kufr to believe the other way. Very passionate in refuting Salaffism like YQ (when he was young). Hehe

The christians debated the same issues centuries before... For example the speech of Allah? Jesus being the "word" of God. Also "does god change" if so, does the change mean he is more perfect or less perfect after the change. Either way, they say... "change" necessitates he is "not perfect"

Love you for the sake of Allah sheikh

The thing about iman at 8:00 makes me wonder if in more Ashari communities, people don't talk about iman highs.

A very intellectual comparison. It is difficult to find unbiased comparisons between Muslim schools of thought these days. Instead of fighting among themselves, Muslims should promote healthy discussions and peaceful propagation of faith.

@soldierofal-rahman7836

2 жыл бұрын

How can we have peaceful and healthy discussions when we have ibn baz saying that asharis are not from ahlussunnah and that they are ahl bidah and deviants?

@DrJames_YT

2 жыл бұрын

@@soldierofal-rahman7836 he's not going to lie and he'll still educate the people. Of course the laymen aren't deviants

@soldierofal-rahman7836

2 жыл бұрын

@@DrJames_YT so Imam Nawawi was deviant? Imam Suyuti?

@DrJames_YT

2 жыл бұрын

@@soldierofal-rahman7836 yes? What's wrong with that, if they literally believed anything which comes from the jahmiyyah then they are definitely wrong in that matter, and it still comes to the conclusion to how they came about to having that belief. Many can and have used a wrong approach to things which results in them believing something incorrect. May Allah forgive them.

Do Ash'aris try and answer the question as to how when it comes to Allah? Like how Allah SWT ascends, descends, etc. or do they say that these statements are metaphorical? For instance, their approach when they speak about The Hand and Face of Allah being used as metaphor rather than literal? I am asking in an effort to gain knowledge on the subject, in shaa Allah. Jazak Allahu khayran.

The call for unity.

I doesn't only goes back to the kalam arguments even the understanding of the Arabic language, goes against that what the salafies claim.

How do I ask him a question?

Basically ALHAMDULILLAH for those who chose the path of the Salaf.

Shaykh, with great respect you only got one thing half correct with regards to iman increasing and decreasing. Asharis believe just like the salafis that iman increases and decreases. It’s more the maturidi school that regards iman as a haal.

Why do you still refer to them as Salafis, they are not the real Salafis which the Prophet praised, nor are they on their path. Rather call them followers of Abdul Wahab, or followers of the Najdi doctrine.

There is no need to argue over tiny matters.

alhamdulillah for the last 1000 years Asahrism is the orthodox position of Sunni islam from all the 4 schools to all the empires the acceptance of this creed is what justifies it's authenticity alhamdulillah huge mountains of scholars from spain till India alhamdulillah

It's unfair to call modern day Atharism salafism. it's not the same.

@HeyIntegrity

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Salafism takes the attributes literally as in affirming anthrophormism.

@omerabbadi9389

3 жыл бұрын

@Ibraishah Abdullah lol najdi doctrine yeah yeah. I am not scholar but shaism and sufism i consider them out of islam . Allah knows best

@alkane2561

3 жыл бұрын

@@omerabbadi9389 bro id be offended but this is actually hilarious 💀💀

@Xaviergonzalez85

3 жыл бұрын

@@alkane2561 supported by no proof?????

@HH-er4qh

2 жыл бұрын

@@HeyIntegrity stop lying

The earlier Asharis affirmed more of the Attributes of Allah. I don't understand why the latter ones don't

@farzana6676

3 жыл бұрын

All Ash'ari affirm all the attributes of Allah. All Muslims InshaAllah affirm all attributes of Allah. Whether they affirm them literally(physically) or metephorically is the question.

The ultimate aim of every Muslim should be to fulfil the huqooq of the Creator and the creation (with knowledge). It ain’t that complicated.

13:45 : there is an error in subtitles

Never heard this variation of Kalam cosmological argument before.

@omaribnalahmed5967

3 жыл бұрын

It's not the kalam cosmological it's the argument from motion.

@Firelord2nd

Жыл бұрын

@@omaribnalahmed5967 So the problem is the motion? Right? “The Actus Purus” “The Unmoved Mover”

Sheikh Yasir, why don’t you commission some studies on differences and similarities.

28 The Innovation of salafism - wahabism has affected muslims across the globe. Many children of salafis think that Allah truly sits and has a face, hand and everything just like human beings and creation. There are so many cases of extreme wahabism and salafism who claim that Allah does have attributes of creation etc. Anf this is the problem with the salafi creed etc.

@sheriefelsayad5578

3 жыл бұрын

On the other hand you have Sufis who believe that the Prophet is Nur Ilahi, and the Ashari creed which is heavily influenced by Greek Philosophy. The Athari creed is the earliest creed. Salafis say Allah has face because Allah says so in the Quran. But not face like human. I dont think you watched the video, you just came to comment some nonsense.

@sheriefelsayad5578

3 жыл бұрын

@JB Priestley you dont have a brain. So you're saying Allah is lying when He says that He has a face?

@kinetickame1203

3 жыл бұрын

The Sheikh differentiates between wahhabism and atharism in other videos but mixes stuff here . I know many wahhabis struggling to avoid imagining anthropomorphism and if they go back to atharism they would clear away of the modern salafis wicked ideology

@sheriefelsayad5578

3 жыл бұрын

@@kinetickame1203 there is no difference between Atharism and Salafism..exact same creed

@kinetickame1203

3 жыл бұрын

@@sheriefelsayad5578 True unless you mean by Salafism pseudo Taimism or Wahhabism. Most of Hanbali imam use Tafweed which is completely different from anthropomorphism

Is any one can help me how to reach dr yasir bye email questions .

So I want to know according to Salafis, when Allah says “everything will perish except the face of Allah” . Does this mean the Hand of Allah and his Shin will also be perished ?? Using there logic the answer will be Yes ?

@fountainofspeech1379

2 жыл бұрын

We dont use logic over revelation. The Quran says Allah is eternal.

@mohamadkhateeb402

2 жыл бұрын

@@fountainofspeech1379 So do you believe Allah is physical?

@sadofaraji5999

2 жыл бұрын

@@fountainofspeech1379 the question was not logic but revealation itself against revealation

@fountainofspeech1379

2 жыл бұрын

@@mohamadkhateeb402 I say what the Quran says and what the Prophet stated in numerous hadith. I don't subtract or add anything to it like you do. Allah says something in the Quran and that's more than enough for me to take it as fact without understanding because we humans can't perceive anything on the level of Allah.

@fountainofspeech1379

2 жыл бұрын

@@sadofaraji5999 so what's your point

I am not sure if it's only some "rogue" shaykhs who are causing division between the salafs & the non. Seems to me it's systemic. Don't give me the "bothsidism". It is inherent in one. The confession of SYQ of his early history should be noted. Unlike him wisdom eludes many. I think the other side coped very well despite.

Sheikh Yasir you have not done justice by describing the creed of the Ashaaira. In Ashari and Maturidi schools, the creed consists of affirming the attributes such as “yad-ullah” the hand of Allah, the ayn ullah, saaq ullah, rigl ullah, nafs ullah, wajh ullah etc. The difference between the salafi and asha’rayn schools is that they affirm the zahir of the words but not the haqiqa yani the literal meaning and leave the meaning of the word to Allah (which is known as tafweed bil-ma’aanaa) and which is common by both athari and ash’ari schools of them: wa nafiy al-kayfa ( denying the modalities and how-ness). However you stated that we asha’ira are supposed to go blank! Don’t even think about the meaning. The sahaba and the tabi’een and the great scholars all have an ijmaa’ that we should not accept the meanings of the words, rather leave it to Allah, tafweed. This is either maybe due to your lack of knowledge by innocence which I would give preference to believe or it is intentional intellectual injustice. The ummah of Muhammad (saws) will never come together upon misguidance. There is clear evidence when looked at the salaf and the later scholars and even scholars today where the majority of all scholars from all times about which aqeedah they have been upon. The salafi school claims that the athari school/hanbali school and the salaf were upon their “aqeedah” of literalism whereas when we look at the statements of the atharis before ibn Taymiyyah (rha) they are all upon the same aqeedah. “Acceptance of the zahir of the word, and not the haqeeqah, tafweed bil-ma’anaa, wa nafiy al kayfa”

@ShezzyyShaikh

2 жыл бұрын

The scholars of Asha’rayn also give preference to take ta’weel which does not contradict the ayah ليس كمثله شيء. So they do not enforce those ta’weelaat. Rather they say instead of thinking of a hand or eye or foot like ours it is better to leave the matter to Allah. Ta’weelat is not permissible by anyone who does not have ijazah in Ilm ul Kalam.

Assalamu alaykum! What about Moturudi?

@optimumlevel8121

3 жыл бұрын

@MH Codes Hanafi Fiqh following comprise of both 'Asharis and Maturidi in Aqeedah

@namakubento9604

Жыл бұрын

Why people just mentioned "ashari"? I think its just about popularity. ashari and maturidhi are the same sometime People said "Ashari" to adress them both in one word or call "Ashari wa almaturidi" but its never been adressed as "maturidi wal ashari. i m an ash'ari btw i m sorry, you re just our little brother 🤣🤣🤣

This just shows that every people have their own Test, even Ulama have their Test, politicians have their Test, rich and poor people have their Test, layman also have their Test. As Salaam O God to your Shalih Servants, all of them..

qor'an said god's throne, you say god does not have throne, or ear or ... so is qor'an wrong?

YQ's inner salafism speaking

@supercookiecookie8092

3 жыл бұрын

He's speaking in a neutral way. He's not even salafi himself

@n.a3642

3 жыл бұрын

@@supercookiecookie8092 He leans more towards the Salafi side.

@supercookiecookie8092

3 жыл бұрын

@@n.a3642 he openly said I left the branch of salaf due to them being very harsh when spoken against and a bit narrow minded.

@n.a3642

3 жыл бұрын

@@supercookiecookie8092 Yes, but that's different from Theory. In theory, he still holds much of the Salafi aqeedah. Litterally his favorute scholar is ibn taymiyyah who is the "father" of today's salafis. When he said he left "Salafis" he is talking about the movement and people involved, not the ideology. However, that is not to say he is completely in line with "Salafism", that's why I just said he leans more towards it. Recently he's made comments about how there is a development in aqeeda (explaining what this means will take forever, but watch the videos if you care), and has said certain things that most Salafis extremely disagree with (the infamous video on what is and isn't shirk.) So he's not completely in line and drifting to something else, but if you were to ask him what he honestly prefers between Ashari vs Salafi(I know, not a realistic question, but if you were to theoretically ask him) he most likely would say Salafi.

Ijma Ulama International 2016 in Chechna, Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamaah.

@shadowwhowalk

2 жыл бұрын

Ijma?

As an ashari, I can say: 1) We believe in Allah regardless of evidence, we trust Muhammad (PBUH), but it might not be enough to just say that to a non Muslim when trying to convince them. So reason does have its place. However, Salafi’s lie when they say don’t use reason, all you have to do is look at Speakers corner, and you quickly realise the Salafis are using reason/science /analogies ect.. Take Shamsi, Mohammad Hijaab, Ali dawah ect… 2) Ashari’s believe in the heart and declare with the tongue. So to say that we don’t is a misrepresentation. And likewise, we do believe that the imaan fluctuates, but if you say something that’s kuffar obviously you go out of the folds of Islam. Nothing switching on and off, unless someones done kuffar 😂 3) Finally, Salafis say Allah said he has a hand so he does, even if it resembles creation, they say the Quran is the word of Allah so he speaks in Arabic. Moreover, Allah has a throne and so he sits on it. Which is ascribing human attributes, astagfirrullah, and goes against the basic tenant that Allah has no equivalent. Their issue with Asharis is that we say is yes we affirm what Allah has said, however it is beyond our comprehension and it is not in a way that confers to his creation but rather in a way that suits Allah’s majesty.

@likop8799

2 ай бұрын

The hand dosnt resemble the creation according to salfis ,salafis don't believe that Allah has body parts they affirm the hand but denying knowledge of its true essence and nature as Allah is unlike the creation

@AmiraMohammedomer

2 ай бұрын

First of all Mohammed hijab is not a Salafi and we don’t say Allah has hands Allah himself say he has hands we just follow what’s written in the Quran and Hadith

@ramyrasu7728

2 ай бұрын

@@AmiraMohammedomer Theoretically Hambali’s/salfis don’t, agreed. But in reality Salafis like Dawa man get so literal that in an attempt to rule out shirk they actually end up doing it by saying it’s possible that hands could be like a humans.

Jazaakallaah very brief but a lot can be said particular ashaaira don't say only seven or eight attributes of Allah but they say the rest of attributes of Allah comes under these eight ones, these ones, Allah cannot exist without them. They don't deny the rest of the attributes, but rather do more ta'wiil( interpretation) then previous sunni imaams. I don't mean ashaaira are not sunni. They are sunni with Shia and without.

SubhanAllah Wlhumdulillah. With our little logic and knowledge we fight over semantics? Astughferullah. May Allah SWT keep the Umma always on the straight path. Ameen.

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

LOL, some of the a'imaa of the salaf takfired those who negated where Allah is. It is imporant to know where he is. Even IBn Abbas said allahs was above his throne Ibn abbas (rah) said:"They reject the Book. If I was to grab the hair of one of them, I would cut it off. Indeed Allaah the Mighty and Majestic was 'above His Throne' before He created anything, then He created the creation. So He wrote whatever would happen until the Day of Judgement and indeed the people proceed upon an affair that has already been concluded. يل لابن عباس: إن ناسا يقولون بالقدر , فقال: «يكذبون بالكتاب , لئن أخذت بشعر أحدهم لأنضونه , 'إن الله عز وجل كان على عرشه' قبل أن يخلق شيئا , فخلق الخلق , فكتب ما هو كائن إلى يوم القيامة , فإنما يجري الناس على أمر قد فرغ منه [3/439 شرح أصول اعتقاد أهل السنة والجماع]

@aukasajalad561

Жыл бұрын

@@DrJames_YT did ibn abbas ra contradict the prophet?pbuh? prophet pbuh said Allah existed before his creation and stay still existed the way he was.

@DrJames_YT

Жыл бұрын

@Aukasa Jalad this doesn’t mean anything….. The prophet himself has stated many things in which he states that Allah is above the heavens

Ashari and salafi just two sides of one coin. Don't be confused. Both are great Muslim ideologies. United we stand. Part we fall

Sheikh should we wear tupi or not ??

@dr.doomofficial

3 жыл бұрын

Lol 😆

@abuhanifah2079

3 жыл бұрын

The answer is that it's up to you... If you like a topi then why not... If you don't, then don't wear it

@maulanashihabuddin8569

3 жыл бұрын

@@abuhanifah2079 I didn’t ask you and before giving answer first know about it thanks

@dr.doomofficial

3 жыл бұрын

😆😆 😂😂

@maulanashihabuddin8569

3 жыл бұрын

@MH Codes yeah

So, what are basic books of Aqeedah that don't go that deep into these differences?

@Asad-gv9in

3 жыл бұрын

Aqeedah Al waasitiyah by ibn taymiyyah rahimahullah

@Asad-gv9in

3 жыл бұрын

Ustadh abdurahman hassan has a very comprehensive and brief explanation on this book

@mikhan5191

3 жыл бұрын

AhlAsSunnah walJama'ah have concensus on the aqidah book by Imam Tahawi - aqida tahawiyyah. Do not trust what ibn Taimiyya says.

@Asad-gv9in

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikhan5191 can you quote any contemporary scholars? Btw dr. Yasir considers himself a student of ibn taymiyyah. People who don't understand the religion say these stuff.

@mikhan5191

3 жыл бұрын

@@Asad-gv9in - YQ used to be part of the Salafi sect & considered himself a student of ibn abdulWahhab but then disowned him after he discovered the facts. When YQ finds out the facts about ibnTaimiyyah, he will stop following his teachings as well, inshaAllah.