Ma sha Allah, Al Ghazali did have a existential, intellectuall crisis for which he travelled physically and spiritually for 10 years, leaving his family behind in this time. He stated that the certainty came to him not from his aql but from a light Allah placed in his heart.

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📚 Introduction to the Three Main Creedal Schools 03:19 📜 Early Islamic Period: Scripturalism and Limited Theological Discourse 11:38 📖 Development within the Hanbali School 17:43 📚 Evaluating the Importance of Early Scholars 23:15 🌐 Concluding Thoughts on Creed and Early Islamic Scholars 23:28 📚 Overview of Even Tamia's Impact 30:23 📖 Influence of Ibn Taymiyyah's Students 36:23 📜 Even Taymiyyah's Unique Views on Divorce 39:14 📚 Scriptural Conservatism in Early Islamic Thought 44:55 🧐 Controversy over Understanding Attributes of Allah 46:23 📚 Differences in interpreting Allah's attributes 51:10 🤔 The clarity of the Companions' understanding 54:09 📜 Early Islamic scholars and their contributions 56:17 📖 Evolution of Islamic thought 01:03:48 🔄 Antagonism and intellectual growth 01:10:11 📚 Discussion on the impact of challenges and opponents on intellectual growth. 01:12:05 📖 Focus on the importance of logic and reason in Islamic jurisprudence. 01:15:13 📚 Brief overview of different Islamic schools and scholars. 01:18:52 🕌 Discussion on the development of Islamic theological thought. 01:21:26 🌐 Emphasis on tolerance and collaboration among different Islamic schools. Made with HARPA AI

@afconsultants732

8 ай бұрын

Jazakallah❤❤❤

@IsmailSarkaya-ll4ts

8 ай бұрын

@@afconsultants732 wa iyyak 😉

@eafesaf6934

2 ай бұрын

Thank you.

@MuskyPirate

28 күн бұрын

ibn taymiyah not "even tamia"

Please make a book out of Londoniyyah. It would turn out to be very interesting.

@SonGoku-io7sh

Жыл бұрын

I think you should go through and make notes out of the videos. Better way to learn InshaAllah.

@SonGoku-io7sh

Жыл бұрын

@@QuadriviumPilot Did I say you're not allowed to study with a book? Maybe learn to better your character instead of being rude to others like an unlearned adolescent.

@sisterfleur7523

Жыл бұрын

Isn't londoniyyah based... on a book ?? Or maybe I did not hear correctly

@sisterfleur7523

Жыл бұрын

@@QuadriviumPilot ok I see. May Allah reward you and bless you. Salam aleykoum !

@Kihalchal786

Жыл бұрын

Read burhan it has a lot of arguments from that

Mohammad Hijam jazakumullahu khairan for your work, may Allah swt keep increasing your knowledge and understanding as well as of all those who commented and may we learn to have a polite and genuine conversations with the truth on mind and not " my dad is bigger then yours".

@markjapan4062

Жыл бұрын

ALLAH THE SUN GOD AKBAR THE MOON GOD . LOOK ON THE MOSQUES...AND FLAGS....

@syedmaazahmed6006

Жыл бұрын

اَمِين يَا رَبَّ الْعَالَمِيْن

@fightingdreamer8681

Ай бұрын

Ameen 🧡

Mohammed Hijab's choice of shirt colour is almost as interesting as this lecture! Maashaa Allah!! Jokes aside, brilliant work by Sapience. Keep it going brothers.

@arfaouisami2955

Жыл бұрын

what about the "samt hasan" ? could we dress up like muslims ? not cloths that describe our bodies from some one who represent islam ?

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

@Kihalchal786

Жыл бұрын

@@arfaouisami2955 no it's not necessary for him to dress like what you describe

Dear brother Allah bless you you are doing great work on this planet and we love ❤

@syedmaazahmed6006

Жыл бұрын

اَمِين يَا رَبَّ الْعَالَمِيْن

I enjoy your sense of humour like when you say the opponent wasn't stepping up his game to be a worthy Orientalist "has ruined me" and the boxing reference. I think you're talking about JP, and and the stimulus a strong opponent brings who can argue with precepts. Incidentally, the redoubtable ar-Razi was saying there is a limit to journeying based on the intellect. The intellect can carry you only so far. May Allah bless the RijaluLlah and may you become amongst them. For the rope of Allah is still being transmitted from Madinatul Munawwah in tariqa

At the beginning brother Hijab made reference to the Shubuhat Series being completed but from watching the last air episode of that series it doesn't seem like it has been, could you clarify if the series will be concluded please?

I was most excited to learn your views on the Maturidi creed and I got a bit disappointed that it was so short but I respect you admitting that you are not as learned in it as maybe in the other 2 creeds discussed here but I would really like a longer video on what you learned about the creed if/when you study it more maybe. For me personally Maturidism is like a hidden gem its very underrepresented especially in the western world even tho Maturidi figures had a big impact on alot of the Ummah. I also wanted to thank you for making your views a bit more clear regarding these very controversial and debated topics in this day and age I am not sure if you will ever read this but I view you as someone honest and trustable and I also wanted to say that I feel that Allah guided me thru making me stumble upon your videos you helped me get out of a bad phase in life in which I didnt know any of these evidences for my beliefs. Jazakallah Khair for your effort

@cesarborgia9240

Жыл бұрын

Maturidis are almost the same as Asharis except for some differences, Abu alhassan Al-Ashari the very founder of this school of thought repented and Wrote the book Al-Ibanah which he announced his new position, he became Athari but mo hijab didn't mention that part lol.

@eerievon2208

Жыл бұрын

@@cesarborgia9240 there r some issues with the authenticity of al ibanah.. eg isnad is weak… or it was written during imam al shari early years after denouncing his mu’tazilla views.. n to add.. he didn’t bother to announce publicly that he had abandoned his own creed n followed athari creed like how he did when he denounced his mu’tazilla views… it’s kinda dodgy n full of malicious intent by u lot… not forgetting the various version of al ibanah floating around each with it’s own adjusted text… so just chill n relax… stop sitting on ur high pedestal n look down on others…

@abdullahalarabi2015

Жыл бұрын

@@dinopalavra876 They claim everyone did this on their deathbed lol. Same for Imam Ashari etc.

@dinopalavra876

Жыл бұрын

@Path of Sahaba asqalani claims ibn taymiyyah repented, yet we dont go around claiming he did

@lumiam6982

Жыл бұрын

@Path of Sahaba I don't believe neither Ibn Kathir (RA) nor Al Dhahabi (RA) made those claims. This is a Salafi propaganda. In fact, it's known they're both Asha'ari. What about Al Dahabi (RA) repenting and writing a book against the creed of Ibn Taymiyyah (RA)? What about Salafi senior scholars criticizing both Ibn Kathir and Al Dhahabi for doing Tafwid? Which is consigning the meaning to Allah and condemning the literal meaning which Salafis do? They don't sound like they follow the creed of Ibn Taymiyyah (RA). I would also like to say all the Ahlu Sunnah before Ibn Taymiyyah believed Imam Asha'ari had two phases. If you believe Ibn Kullab (RA) was a deviant then I suggest you also condemn Imam Bukhari (RA) and Imam Muslim (RA) who both advised the ummah to follow him in theology and several other scholars from the Salaf praised him and called him the defender of Ahlu Sunnah. This claim Imam Asha'ari (RA), Al Juwayni (RA), Al Ghazali (RA) and few others repented on their death bed is a lie made up by Ibn Taymiyyah. No one made these claims before him. Instead of doing Taqleed, how about you investigate his claims? No one in his time took him seriously. He was also known to lie on the Ijma and scholars of his time would ask for proof and he would get emotional and not bring any references. This is all factual, khalas.

I really like this talk. I don't get deep in the difference of aqeedah and just stick to the basics. But I do like to learn about the backgrounds. Usual of the different fiqh is also very interesting. Esp I'm a fan of Shafii but interested by Hanbali.

@maxmudxareed1345

Жыл бұрын

These are carefully selected sophistry.

@jonascarlsson3

11 ай бұрын

Lol "fan of"

@bigboywasim

5 ай бұрын

Imam Shafi (RH) held the view that one can follow any mujtahid in any issue as long you understand the ruling.

@aunthegeek5788

2 ай бұрын

Aqidah is even more interesting. Expand your horizons, fiqh is secondary, aqeedah is essential.

@User48392ur

2 күн бұрын

​@@bigboywasimWhere's the evidence for this?

all i know that ashari, maturidi and ahlu hadith considered Ahlu sunnah wal jamaah. I follow ashari school

@MichiganTroopers123

9 ай бұрын

Be careful some highly intellectual KZread scholars with degrees in KZread commenting may call you a deviant 😂. Btw by KZread scholars I meant laymen

@G1NG3RRR

8 ай бұрын

Shafi Ashari over here!

@honingpot4577

2 ай бұрын

@@G1NG3RRRmuslim over here!

@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273

16 күн бұрын

Asheri and atharis are part of sunni This is just intellectual debate

The perfect primer for anyone curious about this sensitive topic.

I love your great work brother, may Allah shower you with blessings. You, your family, relatives and colleagues. One precision: Moroccan arabic is not mixed with four or five european languages. It is arabic heavily influenced by amazigh gramatical structure, with amazigh words, words of turkish origins (I know that the Ottomans did not stay more than a hundred years but there is concrete proof and studies of this. Even I was shocked about this) and unfortunaly a lot of French arabized words (as well as a few of spanish origins in the norther parts of the country). wa salam aleykoum

@mrgentlea8717

Жыл бұрын

Oh by bbbbbbjjvvlbbhbhvn in v. Nvnn nn. L. Bhbhhbhbbb

@mrgentlea8717

Жыл бұрын

Lvbbvbbhbł Oh llnnnlon

@mrgentlea8717

Жыл бұрын

L biokol l. Olli. Ok

@mrgentlea8717

Жыл бұрын

Njo

Ashrai segment starts at 44:10 This issue with this video is that it doesn’t really explain the arguments of these groups. He’s only talking about the key figures and their opinions on each other and what this sheikh said about that sheikh. Your title implies that you’re gonna talk about those aqai’id but you’re not. It’s great that you know all this but you’re all over the place and this is clearly not organized as much as it should have been. Please fix that mistake brother and thank you for your work.

*Creedal Schools of Thought* 0:00:00 - Background Information 0:04:31 - Introduction 0:10:01 - Timeline of the Creeds

Topic moved to explaining Aqeedah and Manhaj of ibn taymiyyah.

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

Also The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

May Allāhu Ta3ālā reward you tremendously. Your lectures are amazing, Allāhumma bārik. I've been following you for about 7 years now and you're always try to be as neutral as possible without being biased. Keep up the great work! Greetings from Belgium

@fightingdreamer8681

Ай бұрын

Ameen 🧡

Assalamualeykum Brother, I wanted to correct one point. Imam Taftazani is an ashari scholar, not maturidi. But he wrote a sharh on Aqaid an-nasafiyah. The Matn is maturidi but the sharh is from an ashari scholar.

@mountainmanrus

Жыл бұрын

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

@hduendvshis

Жыл бұрын

Br. Mohammad Hijab use those both schools interchangeable, because they are very similar in relation to atharizm.

@_zaaphiel

Жыл бұрын

Taftazani says that Asharis reject the sifat in that commentary :P

@TimeflowBratan

Жыл бұрын

There is ikhtiflaf on that I think, but most people say he's Ashari

@rayanmakarem4327

5 ай бұрын

​@@_zaaphiel Incorrect he affirms the Ashari position in the attributes but says the Philosophers denied the attributes.

Ibn al-Hummam one of the greatest Hanafi jurists.

Assalaam. Constructive information, shukran and jazakAllah khair.

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

Love it...

My understanding is there is even a split within Atharism. Those who practice tafwīdh like the ‘Ash’aris and Maturidis and those who practice ithbāt.

@MZD15

Жыл бұрын

What's sad is Salafis say things which are not said by Salafs. For eg: if we say "Our fate is in God's Hands" and you ask the meaning of this to general population, they will say it's God who is in control of our destiny etc. But if you ask A salafi, what do you takeaway from the above he will say "God has a hand unlike any other hand" Let's look at some examples below: 1. Hands. In the verse, "And the sky We built with hands; verily We outspread [it]" (Qur'an 51:47), al-Tabari ascribes the figurative explanation (ta’wil) of with hands as meaning "with power (bi quwwa)" through five chains of transmission to Ibn ‘Abbas, who died 68 years after the Hijra, Mujahid who died 104 years after the Hijra, Qatada [ibn Da‘ama] who died 118 years after the Hijra, Mansur [ibn Zadhan al-Thaqafi] who died 131 years after the Hijra, and Sufyan al-Thawri who died 161 years after the Hijra (Jami‘ al-bayan, 27.7-8). I mention these dates to show just how early they were. 2. Shin. Of the Qur'anic verse, "On a day when shin shall be exposed, they shall be ordered to prostrate, but be unable" (Qur'an 68:42), al-Tabari says, "A number of the exegetes of the Companions (Sahaba) and their students (tabi‘in) held that it [a day when shin shall be exposed] means that a dire matter (amrun shadid) shall be disclosed" (Jami‘ al-bayan, 29.38)-the shin’s association with direness being that it was customary for Arab warriors fighting in the desert to ready themselves to move fast and hard through the sand in the thick of the fight by lifting the hems of their garments above the shin. This was apparently lost upon later anthropomorphists, who said the verse proved ‘Allah has a shin,’ or, according to others, ‘two shins, since one would be unbecoming.’ Al-Tabari also relates from Muhammad ibn ‘Ubayd al-Muharibi, who relates from Ibn al-Mubarak, from Usama ibn Zayd, from ‘Ikrima, from Ibn ‘Abbas that shin in the above verse means "a day of war and direness (harbin wa shidda)" (ibid., 29.38). All of these narrators are those of the sahih or rigorously authenticated collections except Usama ibn Zayd, whose hadiths are hasan or ‘well authenticated.’

@abdelhakyac7285

Жыл бұрын

the neo salafis are the most divided ones

@salahjraden7592

Жыл бұрын

@@MZD15 the verse in sūrat Ad-dhariyat does not mean hands to even need a ta'weel. The word أيد originates from آد يئيد which means to have strength. The verse which shows that hands mean hands is that of sūrat Sād (38:75) in which Allah SWT says "O Iblees, what prevented you from prostrating to that which I created with my hands?" Here Imam Tabari interprets the word "ََّبيدَي" to mean hands, and he narrates from ibnu Umar that "Allah SWT created four things by his hands." When it comes to the attributes of Allah SWT, it is safer to accept them as they are and make the tafweed of the how كيفية

@Sheen023

Жыл бұрын

@@salahjraden7592 .

@FalseAlarm

Жыл бұрын

What about the shin ayah? Do you take Tabri’s view on that?

47:30 Ustadh Muhammad Hijab pointed out that Buchari said; Allah is distinguished from his creation - meaning he is not in or outside his creation.

Very nice and assuring ending, Jazakallah.

Imam abul hasan ash'ari had written tafseer of 350+ volumes, and the pages of that time were bigger than that of modern day. Unfortunately it was 🔥🔥🔥 and we lost this treasure.

I'd advise brother Hijab to ascribe yourself to the view of Ibn Qudamah al Maqdisi on the statements given by imam Ahmad. Comparing him with ibn Taymiyyah is like night and day, there is no doubt he was closest to the salaf and imam Ahmad in his ways. And I say this as an ash'ari, knowing both's stance towards us, but I also acknowledge that the critics of both of them hold an entirely different degree of truth, and the conclusions they both have at the end is evaluated with their own methodology in mind.

@Ersilay

Жыл бұрын

@Path of Sahaba Wrong on basically every point. Stop learning from the internet. Ibn Qudamah doesn't prove it's from the fitrah, he merely posit it is from it. And he argues for a fiqhi view of pointing upward, not aqa'id, which is ironically the view shared by the asha'irah. As for him calling the asha'irah ahl'ul bid'ah, so what? Do we take into account the many that have deemed imam Abu Hanifa out of the fold of ahl'ul sunnah deviants? Not necessarily. Do we take their jarh into account? No. Same case here. He is no deviant, yet his critique is simply not taken into account. The fact that you seem to view this topic as black and white... as I said, stop learning your deen from the internet. We simply do not follow 1 scholar on every point he makes, especially in aqeedah. Otherwise we end up as brainless fools who try to argue the Creation as a type is eternal, hellfire will end and emergents can exists within the essence of Allah, despite having no proof from amongst the salaf, the Quran and Sunnah apart from a wishful reading of it that has precedence only within the philosopher circled, ibn Rushd at their head and IT and IQ following on the footsteps

@Ersilay

Жыл бұрын

@Path of Sahaba "you pick and choose what you like lmao" Go study, I'm not your dad to explain to you how 'uloom works

@abdulvahitamro

Жыл бұрын

@@Ersilay I mean if we are going to take from ابن قدامة، he has the same aqeedah as sheikul islam ibn teymmiye, because he did tafwidh of kayf not of the meaning, and tafwidh of meaning is the same as ignorance of the verses, because if we do this tafwidh we will not be able to understand anything from that tafwidh, beside that why did Allan SWT said those sifaat verset in the quran if we are not going to understand anything from them, and if the salaf did that tafwidh, then the asharite and maturidis understand the quran more than them, including the Prophet peace be upon him

@Ersilay

Жыл бұрын

@@abdulvahitamro ibn Qudamah did tafwid of the kayf? What are you smoking: لا حاجة لنا إلى علم معنى ما أراد الله تعالى من صفاته جل وعز فإنه لا يراد منها عمل ولا يتعلق بها تكليف سوى الإيمان بها ويمكن الإيمان بها من غير علم معناها فإن الإيمان بالجهل صحيح فإن الله تعالى أمر بالإيمان بملائكته وكتبه ورسله وما أنزل إليهم وإن كنا لا نعرف من ذلك إلا التسمية وإن عاب السكوت عن التفسير أخطأ فإننا لا نعلم لها تفسيرا ومن لم يعلم شيئا وجب عليه السكوت عنه وحرم عليه الكلام فيه قال الله تعالى {ولا تقف ما ليس لك به علم} وذكر الله تعالى في المحرمات {وأن تقولوا على الله ما لا تعلمون}… وأيضا فإن عائب هذه المقالة عائب على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فإنه كان يؤمن بالله وكلماته ولم يفسر شيئا من ذلك ولا بين معناه Both are from his Tahrim. Like why do you lie when he literaly says it? وعلموا أن المتكلم بها صادق لا شك في صدقه فصدقوه ولم يعلموا حقيقة معناها فسكتوا عما لم يعلموه وأخذ ذلك الآخر والأول ووصى بعضهم بعضا بحسن الإتباع والوقوف حيث وقف أولهم وحذروا من التجاوز لهم والعدول عن طريقهم وبينوا لهم سبيلهم ومذهبهم ونرجوا أن يجعلنا الله تعالى ممن اقتدى بهم في بيان ما بينوه وسلوك الطريق الذي سلكوه Here he talks about the madhab of the salaf is not knowing about the reality of their meanings. Like you see meaning, meaning, meaning, meaning, meaning, then you have your sorry attempt at rewriting history saying "nO iT's KaYfIyYaH".... wallahi this is pathetic. This is so blatant that your sheikh, abdur razzaq afeefi said this on the matter: مذهب السلف هو التفويض في كيفية الصفات لا في المعنى، وقد غلط ابن قدامة في لمعة الاعتقاد، وقال: بالتفويض ولكن الحنابلة يتعصبون للحنابلة، ولذلك يتعصب بعض المشايخ في الدفاع عن ابن قدامة، ولكن الصحيح أن ابن قدامة مفوض Do I have to quote ibn Uthaymin contradicting himself in the same sentence, first saying he's upon the madhab of tafwid al ma'na, which is one of the worst deviance, and straight after calling him an imam of the sunnah who couldn't have wrote that. He was talking about luma'tul i'tiqad... literally the strongest book we have from ibn Qudamah. And this doesn't adress the half a dozen of other books where he explicitly states that he makes tafwid of the ma'na... denying this is foolish, only suitable for your ilk

11:40 Imam Buchari mentioning Allah is above the Throne but he never said to take the literal meaning of it… the literal meaning would mean Allah ta ala has changed… He also talks about Allahs smiling and says it means he is pleases with his servants… Ustadh Muhammad Hijab mentioned it before and many times… Even the Sahabah interpreted things which Allah said about him when the literal meaning contradicts what we know about Allahs saaat (essence).

Beautiful, i always like basic aqeedah without going into depth. This results in 0 debates and spending time where its more needed

@finvknownmuslim

Жыл бұрын

I ask allah to guide you to truth

@MohammadQasim

Жыл бұрын

@@finvknownmuslim Ameen

@Kimeikus

Жыл бұрын

@@finvknownmuslim Ameen

@finvknownmuslim

Жыл бұрын

@@wackypeace1135 who said that. Accusing my intention or neyah is a clear reflection of a black heart. Accusing muslims without evidence is a sin in islam. Be careful next time. May allah forgive you

@finvknownmuslim

Жыл бұрын

@@wackypeace1135 i dont like responding a lot however i think the issue you have is presupposing ever dua done by someone to the other is some how reflection of superiortiy or arogance of the one making dua over the other. This supposition is faulty because i may have done dua to myself after or before typing you will never know + the ملائكة write back the dua for the one making it which is a mercy from allah that making dua for your brother is payed bacl to you. Second point i am not hypocrite i am stating a fact in deen read tazkiya books yourself. One of its topics talks about heart diseases that lead us astray and one of them is accusing fellow muslims without evidence is a sign of a disease in your heart. I used evidence + i want what is good for you that is why i am advicing.

01:03:00 Ustadh Muhammad Hijab: The Ash’ari school has brought about without doubt some of the most intellectual, genius in Islamic history. We have ibn Taymiyyah in Hanbali school but the Ash’aris have so many ibm Taymiyyah. And that’s hard to say 😂😂😂🌹

@ARmirzaful

Жыл бұрын

Only imam ar razi comes to ibn Taymiyyah level. This is why ibn Taymiyyah focused on responding to his points and not even Imam Ghazali. Also if there were so many ibn Taymiyyah who were ashari level scholars, the whole world would only study ashari shafiee school. They would never study the hanbali school at all.

@Kihalchal786

Жыл бұрын

@@ARmirzaful about 70 to 80% of muslims are asharis/ maturidis

@ARmirzaful

Жыл бұрын

@@Kihalchal786 There is no way really to gauge numbers. Most Muslims don’t know the strictness of the salafis…they are too busy running from them. Or the philosophy of the asharis…most Muslims are not intellectual enough to read baqillaani or ibn fawruk. Allaah knows best.

@Kihalchal786

Жыл бұрын

@@ARmirzaful oh really ? I dont think so there are 200 million muslims in india around 150 million are asharis/maturidis + around 170 million in pak among atleast 100 million ahsaris/maturidis + around 30 million maturidis/asharis in Bangladesh . And I can guess that other countries including Malaysia etc will have roughly 150 million asharis and maturidis atleast Now, How many of these learn deen in their life this can be understood by the fact that the madaris are almost everywhere and also . We have a system called darsgah or maqtab where almost every children of the town or village goes, who teaches them asharis and maturidis .

@abdulvahitamro

Жыл бұрын

@@Kihalchal786 bro most of Muslims don't know anything about Kalam, you can't really be an atharite or maturidi without knowing Kalam

Excellent topic

where can I register to this 3 year thing for explaining the londoniyyah?

41:50 Allah is above the throne- As Ustadh Muhammad Hijab said: when the Sahabah heard the verses which are Mutashabihat - they believed the verses mean - How magnificent is Allah, how powerful etc. and not that Allah ta ala is literally above the throne with his Saat (essence).

@Dryoussofshammaa

Жыл бұрын

Directions were created by Allah jal jalaluhu, he existed before directions and since muslims beleive that Allah subhanahu wa taala created the throne and the throne has limits, the space above the throne is not a void. Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him said that above the throne there’s a book where it is written ” إن رحمتي سبقت غضبي" which means the features of God’s mercy outnumber those of his wrath. So for someone to say that Allah subhanahhu taala is in a direction above the throne is saying he now shares that place with that book. Allah jala jalaluhu exists before creating directions, and after creating them, he does not need them. So the meaning of (الرحمٰن على العرش استوى ) should be understood with what’s befitting to Allah, he established authority over the biggest creation, and by extension over everything smaller than it. Istawa means قهر، حفظ and 13 other meanings in Arabic, and no one should use a meaning from those that would have someone imagine that Allah jal jalaluhu needs a direction or place to exist. Solid bodies like books, trees, people, planets need a place and direction to exist, soft bodies like the wind, light, the soul need a place to exist. But Allah subhabahu wa taala created these attributes and things and directions, he does not change after creating them or become bound by them, subhanahu wa taala.

@namakubento9276

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahmad_DE vertical height is created Allah's aboveness isnt conclusion : Allah is The most High, BUT ITS NOT vertical height

@namakubento9276

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahmad_DE And His aboveness isnt vertical height

@namakubento9276

Жыл бұрын

@@Ahmad_DE Not in vertical direction. its created

@koshinaden263

Жыл бұрын

Wait so yall didnt listen to what he said

Prophet ﷺ said: ‘Allāh existed and nothing (including place and direction) existed apart from Him’ (Bukhārī). Place, locus and directions are all creations and He is the only Creator - it is rationally impossible for the Creator to dwell into His creation.

@datasets2046

Жыл бұрын

Bukhari 7420

@ahmadswalihck

Жыл бұрын

But the atharis reject rational thinking

@lonebedouin9922

Жыл бұрын

I am not here to discuss, but some remarks. First of all, there are certain lies and half truths told about Atharis and their Aqida. For example, an Athari is not a mujasima. There are maybe mujasima that are Atharis, but an Athari is not automatically a mujasima. Second, using the concept of rationality (which is not stable in itself and free from subjectivity, person X sees something as rational while person Y sees the same thing as irrational, or person X will see something as rational today, and tomorrow, he will see the same thing as irrational) to try to explain the unseen (Allah Himself, His throne, etc.) entails certain risks or is even doomed to fail. In the Akhira, there will be people who will see Allah Himself and His Throne. There is no doubt regarding that, it is there, it exists. Second, one of the main problems with the Aqida of asharis, maturidis, etc. is that it cannot be uphold without neglecting certain verses of the Quran and certain words of the Prophet and the Sahabi, and without neglecting certain words of many of the Salaf, the clear majority of them hold views that contradict essential parts of their Aqida (while supporting the Aqida of Atharis). Third, another problem and lack of sincerity in dealing with these matters of the unseen is that exogenous assumptions play a far too important role in their Aqida. They value (exogenous) assumptions more than the words of Allah, the Prophet, the Sahabi and many great scholars of the Salaf. What you are doing there is trying to work with the concept of rationality and exogenous assumptions to try to explain something regarding the unseen, to be able to make a certain conclusion in regards to the unseen. You are taking "and nothing existed apart from Him", then you are adding the concept of time, space and direction to that, and then you are also taking "it is rationally impossible for the creator to dwell into His creation", so that you can conclude a certain conclusion. You are putting the capability of our limited mind above the content within the Deen itself, a way that is prone to mistakes and false conclusions in regards to the unseen. The matters of the unseen are far greater than the matters of this seen world, trying to explain them by putting so much emphasis on exogenous assumptions and the concept of rationality, is or can be fatal, and is also kind of doomed to fail. Such conclusions, in regards to the unseen, do not come from the Deen itself, but it comes through exogenous assumptions one establishes based on our limited mind, and limited to the things we can perceive with our senses in this seen world (and Allah knows best what we have not perceived yet regarding this seen world, and are not able to perceive at all). One should be cautious applying the same rules of the seen world to the unseen world. Allah has created great and incredible things, we have not seen yet, and only will see in the Akhira, if Allah wills. So, the methods they use are doomed to fail, especially in the long term. If there are mistakes recognized, then not because they have gathered a better understanding in regards to the content of the Deen itself, but because they have learned and perceived new things regarding this seen world, things they have not recognized/realized before. That way, one can see something as rational today, but then as irrational tomorrow. To conclude, there are way too many verses in the Quran, transmissions from the Prophet, the Sahabi, and too many works of great scholars of the Salaf that contradict crucial parts of their Aqida, independent of whether one looks at them as a whole or separately/isolated. One will not be able to find another Aqida than that of Atharis that is the most loyal to the content of the Deen, and makes most sense within the framework of our Deen. May Allah guide us, and open our hearts and minds towards what is true and right, and not towards what our nafs wants to be true and right, may He make us devoted to Him and not to our nafs.

@fifafreebies8941

Жыл бұрын

@LoneBedouin99 2 simple questions for you . Is place, direction, space, time Creation or Eternal ? Is God independent of his creation ??

@ahmadswalihck

Жыл бұрын

@@lonebedouin9922 So tell me what verses one has to neglect to justify Ashari/Maturidi Aqeeda.

keep these videos coming

Really enjoyable. So much useful information,

Assalamu Alaikum Alhamdulillah Alhamdulillah in this Majliz ( educational gathering ) you have brought about many many titles of very very important books on various Mashaikh's ( religious scholars ) . I look forward from hearing & learning from you , i personally don't know about your religious knowledge though it seems you've graduated from your home town Al Azhar University 😃 correct me if im my brother ☺️ Allah humma barik Barakallah hu feek

بارك الله فيك و بإنصافك و ثبتك على هذا المنهج

Can you discuss the book Al-Aqida al-Tahawiyya

JazakAllahu khairan

Can someone show me the link for the test

1:19:00 Kawthari sure wasn't Ashari, he was Maturidi. And it was Razi who said that statement about Ibn Khuzaymah's book

@smileyface8412

3 ай бұрын

Theres no core difference. When the word ashari is used amingst scholars they are understood to mean both Ashari and Maturidi

"I'm not here to defend the principles I'm here to follow the salaf". Spot on! 👌

@TheMercifulAndJust

Жыл бұрын

He/some want(s) to follow the salaf and between him and them are 1200 years !

@MohOz

11 ай бұрын

​@@TheMercifulAndJustyou want to follow RasulAllah sallallahu alaihi wasallam and the difference is 1400 yrs

@LearnTawhid

9 ай бұрын

The salaf as-salih were not asharis or maturidis. May Allah guide hijab and all his followers to true Islam.

@aunthegeek5788

2 ай бұрын

@@LearnTawhid They weren't Atharis or the deviant offshoot of Atharism that Salafis follow today either.

@user-xi5im3hu4p

Ай бұрын

@@aunthegeek5788the salaf were ahlul hadith and ahlul athar and they used this label jahil.

I have a question, why not the word "athari" (instead of hanbali) ? Does anyone know ? Jazakumullahu khair, salam aleykoum

@jasonjason6525

Жыл бұрын

Because the other Madhhabs eventually became Asharis and Maturidis, while the Hanbalis remained Atharis.

@fatezero1919

Жыл бұрын

@@jasonjason6525 haha all 4 madhabs were atharis

@jasonjason6525

Жыл бұрын

@@fatezero1919 didn’t i say “eventually”?

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

The early term was hanbali in aqeedah not athari

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

@@dinopalavra876 yes salafis have really messed up the Hanbali aqeedah

Amazing thank you Please go deeper in explaining

A very detailed and informative video ما شاء لله ! But a very small correction brother ; Deoband school of thought follows the Maturidiyyah Creed. May Allah bless you and May Allah grant you all goodness آمین

@Adam91838

11 ай бұрын

deobandis doesnt. they are not sunnis.

@rafiullah9262

11 ай бұрын

@@Adam91838 Instead of slandering the other group, I would request you to attain knowledge. The ikhtilaf between the Deobandi's & the Barelvi Ulema is not one that is of kufr. It is of furo'i aqaid. I'm very sure that if I ask you a few things about the aqidah of us Hanafi Maturidis you won't be able to answer. Both sides have ulema & dalail. I am a Hanafi Maturidi and I respect both the schools and benefit from both الحمد لله . Ulema's from both the schools have committed some real bad mistakes but afterall they were all humans. So learn the deen and try to put it into practice instead of deciding who's from the Ahlus Sunnah and who's not. جزاک لله خیر

@JHMninja89

11 ай бұрын

@@rafiullah9262 do the barelvis not make takfir of salafis? and use derogatory language like wobbler?

@rafiullah9262

11 ай бұрын

@@JHMninja89 Being an honest Muslim from the Ahlus Sunnah what would you prefer from the following? : 1) Following the usool. 2) Using harsh words against a group or an individual because they use harsh language towards us? What I have learned from my Shuyookh is that no matter what the other person or a group says ; stick to the usool and do not declare them a bid'ati, mushrik or a kafir etc just cause they call you one. I would like to give you the same advice as well. جزاک لله خیر

@rafiullah9262

11 ай бұрын

Also clarifying that I'm a Hanafi Maturidi and not from either of the groups under discussion even though I respect both of the groups equally and consider both of the groups from Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah Ahnaf Maturidiyyah. May Allah grant goodness to the ulema and mashaikh of both the groups and May Allah grant us all the correct understanding of Islam. آمین

1:08:00 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "You ruined me. You're such an easy opponent"

54:43- a slight correction on what the Ustadh said about Imam al-Ash'ari. He didnt write few books; he wrote many books, more than a hundred and it is said that he wrote a tafsir of the Quran that reached 70 volumes. Unfortunately, most of his works became extant and only around 5 books have reached us. To learn more about Imam al-Ash'ari, you can read Shaykh Abdal-Qadir al-Husayni's work on Imam al-Ash'ari and the 4 volume work that was published by al-Azhar al-Sharif on Imam al-Ash'ari's legacy.

@haghuro9843

2 ай бұрын

Also people should read his final book. Sadly many asharis lie and claim it isn’t attributed to him, but many of his contemporary scholars claim it was from him. It’s called “Al-Ibaanah an Usool id-Diyaanah”

@abdullahimusa9761

2 ай бұрын

@haghuro9843 Contemporary Asharis, in general, don't deny al-Ibanah was written by the Imam. The debate normally revolves around whether it was the last book the Imam wrote or whether al-Luma' was the last book and a compelling case can be made that al-Ibanah predates al-Luma'. Also, if you want a comprehensive account of Imam al-Ash'ari's aqidah (especially since most of his books are extant) see Imam Ibn Furak's "Mujarad Maqālāt al-Shaykh Abi-l Hasan al-Ash'ari".

@haghuro9843

2 ай бұрын

@@abdullahimusa9761 many scholars close to his time period stated it was his final word: Al-Bayhaqi (Al-I’tiqād wal-Hidāyah ilā Sabeelir-Rashād (pp. 31, 32, 26)) Imam Adh-Dhahabi (Al-‘Uluww lil-‘Aliyyil-Ghaffār (p. 160) Ibn Farhoon Al-Māliki (Ad-Dībāj (pp. 193-194) Ibn Katheer (Al-Bidāyah wan-Nihāyah (11/187) where he affirmed that Al-Ibānah was the final book of Abul-Hasan Al-Ash’ari.) Ibn Taymiyyah (Al-Fatāwa Al-Hamawiyyah Al-Kubrā (p. 70) There’s more I just can’t be bothered writing them all here

49:00 Ustadh Hijab points out that Ibn Abbas believed that Wajhullah (the face of Allah) - means his Qibla not a literal face as some salafi selects believe in.

The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

@ARmirzaful

Жыл бұрын

Very true in a sense ar razi and an nawawi were very different. Ar razi was more philosophical an nawawi was more hadith oriented. I don’t know as much about imam as suyooti but he is not as intellectual as imam razi, who was a true intellectual giant raheemuhullaah. His Tafseer mafaatih al ghayb shows why imam ar razi was at ibn Taymiyyah level…perhaps even higher.

@user-vy3hb7ir6o

4 ай бұрын

The early Ash'aris were Ahlul-Hadith as well as Nawawi states clearly in his explanation of Saheeh Muslim. We should remember that a person being affiliated with a group holding certain views does not mean that he represents the group in all of his views - even if he us prominent; like Ar-Razi.

Deobandis are predominantly Maturidi (not Ash'ari - although the two are very close)

@bhatbasit8614

6 ай бұрын

Deobandi are predominantly Wahhabis(not Maturidi/Ashari and two are completely opposite to one other) It was in India that Deobandi movement was found and truth of matter is this movement was nothing but continuation of Wahhabi movement led by Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi in Arab from Najd known as so called Muwahhidun movement indirectly same name used by Mu'tazila in past and Indian version of same Wahhabi movement known as so called Tariqa e Muhammadiyah directly led by Gustakh e Ahmad of Rai Bareli. Note: This khwarji Wahhabi propagandist Indian movement was deliberately divided into two subsects or subgroups of Indian wahhabiyah one called themselves gair muqallideen/ahle Hadees which miserably failed in Indo subcontinent led by Siddiq Hasan Bhopali and co thus right hand of (Gustakh of)Ahmad of Rai Bareli's right hand man Ismail Dehalvi took rashid Gangohi,Qasim Nanotvi under his wing to spread/sell more acceptable yet same Wahhabi stained product in name of hanafism while being in core/aqeeda same khwarji Wahhabi just like their cousins so called Ahle Hadees(name given official recognition by Queen Elizabeth after gair muqallid wahhabi begged to their British masters). Hijab himself is a Wahhabi only difference is guy is neo ikhwani(old name used by Wahhabi barbarians led by Ibn saud against Ottoman Caliphate). These neo Ikhwanis think having same aqaid like wahhabis then differentiating with them in few things and renouncing original founding fathers like Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi and Ibn Taimmiya like how Deobandis did would just make them free from Wahhabi stain and wahhabi khwarji name, well they can totally fool common ignorant people to have them join them in their secretly Wahhabi cults but knowledgeable person would never fall for it

@youngomniverse35

5 ай бұрын

​@@bhatbasit8614I'm sorry what? You have no idea of what you're speaking of. Deobandi's don't have a set aqeedah, some are Athari, some are Ashari and some are Maturidi. The ulama of Deoband also criticised Mohammed ibn Abdul Wahhab heavily and over 20 of them signed off on the work of Khalil Ahmed Shanapuri which quoted the verdict of ibn Abidin who declared him to be the khawarij of his time.

@Osama-Anwar

5 ай бұрын

​​​@@bhatbasit8614typical brelvi. According to you guys if one don't believe Prophet S.A.W. is Noor than he is Gustakh and Wahabi.

@bhatbasit8614

5 ай бұрын

@@youngomniverse35 you're just as ignorant as one can be, Deobandis have same set of aqaid which they acquired from Nanotvi Gangohi ambethvi all of whom got it from Ahmad of rai barelvi and ismail Dehalvi whom both gair muqallid sifli Wahhabi and Deobandi wahhabis follow and call shaheeds and actually are true founders of both sects. Deobandis got nothing to do with Ashari Maturidi and athari in aqaid or hanafi shafi maliki Hanbali in fiqh they are what they're,they only follow three monkeys who founded this school under agent Ismail Dehalvi with full support from British government, Deobandis all andhere to Qasim Nanotvi and Rashid Gangohi and they have laid the foundation of their khwarji beliefs in their books which were inspired by taqwiyat ul iman of ismail Dehalvi indian version of kitab ut tawhid of ibn abdul Wahhab Najdi Read your history first then come to talk. Today if Wahhabi would write fatwa against Saudi government it doesn't mean he no longer remains Wahhabi and hasn't taken millions in petrodollars, thing is when you teach your dog only to bark hate and terrorize people and make it complete beast,one day it's gonna unleash upon you too, doesn't saudi today fear their own creation wahhabis most? so it doesn't matter if Wahhabi Deobandi fight today or in your fantasy Khalil ambethvi murtad criticized him and quoted our scholar. If BJP would tomorrow criticize Mohan Bhagwat current leader of RSS would that mean BJP isn't political wing of RSS and have zero connection to it? Deobandi only started to separate themselves from their Brothers in crime gair muqallideen who call themselves ahle hadis or salafi today when in early 2000s Saudi petrodollars were cut off to Deobandi circles thus creating rift in both. Ask both so called muqallid wahhabis(Deobandi) and gair muqallid Wahhabi(siflis)who is ismail Dehalvi and Ahmad of rai barelvi they both will tell you lol,both of them were staunch wahhabis and actually started Wahhabi movement in Indo subcontinent as part of British divide and rule policy before that sunni Muslims had zero rift with each other and all had same beliefs which in today's day and age are followed by Sunnis too whom khwarjis call barelvis or sufis to isolate them and counter Sunnis and give their ignorant sunni targets false impression that they're part of new sect when in fact it's they Deobandi khwarji Wahhabis who are new subsects of grand khwarji sect and haven't been found anywhere along with all their sick blashpemous beliefs till before 1900s. Buildings talk writings talk and all shrines of Auliya and Ambiya in Syria Iraq Palestine India Kashmir Pakistan Bangladesh Kazakhstan Tukey and all muslim nations which are thousand years old like those or Prophets or some hundred years old those of Sahaba Auliya and Salaf are proof of sunni existence whereas Wahhabis is real biddah and they're all either deviants or murtadeen cause of their takfeer of ummah and blashpemous beliefs period. Know your history own it and be ashamed

@bhatbasit8614

5 ай бұрын

@@youngomniverse35 I replied you many times someone keeps deleting my comment

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Quick question... When the Imam says "الاستواء معلوم" is he saying the act of "استواء" is "معلوم" because Allah informed us of it or the linguistic meaning of the word "استواء" is known to us so it is the word that is "معلوم" اللهم بارك لكم

Its inevitable to read Tabsiratul Adillah on the Maturidi creed. That's the real Maturidi deal. Also and the book of Imam Nooruddin Al Sabuni the one who debated with Imam Razi.

@javohir2912.

7 ай бұрын

Brother, can you be more specific? What are you talking about?

If there is any cure for atheism in this modern era it is in the teachings of Al Razi and Ghazali.

@yousefalfuraih

11 ай бұрын

You think this way because they used reasoning to destroy the rationalists But ibn taymiyyah used reason and destroyed philosphers who are atheist and even ar razi You can read his rudud on ar razi 28:30 And as hijab said he brought a sledge hammer on his opponents

@Visible-jb2ew

11 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@yousefalfuraihNo way you compared ibn taymiyyah to ghazali and razi… especially on philosophy

@yousefalfuraih

11 ай бұрын

As salamu aleykum brother i find it really funny that you are suprised but really go read ta3arud al aql wa anaql from ibn taymiyah and you are going to see that ar razi is not on his level (in philospohy) When it comes to al ghazali its really hard to say who is better i would say it depends on what area of philosphy we are going to talk about. I believe that imam al ghazali made a mistake in asmaa and sifat of allah And ibn taymiyyah didnt ant both ibn taymiyyah and al ghazali refuted ibn sina s work so i would say ibn taymiyyah and al gahzalli are not the same because ibn taymiyyah maintaind high level of philosphy while still going with text ant not the mind over the text like al ghazaliay allah have mercy on all of them

@Visible-jb2ew

11 ай бұрын

@@yousefalfuraih Wa alaykum salam brother in which do you think he Ghazali made a mistake on asma and sifat?

@osaidalshaer3340

10 ай бұрын

​@@Visible-jb2ewal ghazali himself lived his while life with reluctance changing madhabs untill finally he repented and said that Al-Kalam does not give answers and if we were to drop all masks it is haram.... Al-Shafii said it is haram too even al razi repented and said the same and he said "whoever tried my experience will know my knowledge" ie Al Kalam is not useful in giving full clear certain answers.

"Ali Dawah passed the test" moment

With this understanding, why do salafis cling onto Ibn Taymiyyah if he’s not even one of the salaf and introduced/dabbled in approaches that the salaf didn’t?

@haghuro9843

2 ай бұрын

There’s a misconception that salafi’s rely or mostly rely on Ibn Taymiyyah. Most of their beliefs come from the book “creed of the raziy’ayn” written by Imam Abu Zur’ah Ar-Raazi (277AH) and Imam Abu Hatim Ar-Raazi (264AH)

1:19:45 Mohammad Hijab what is the full named a athari scholar who refuted Kawthiri?

@narmi218

Жыл бұрын

Abdur-Rahman al-Mu'allimee

@narmi218

Жыл бұрын

@@dinopalavra876 That is true enough as I just provided the name and not suggesting who was right or more correct in the matter. That is beyond my station or level of knowledge to judge.

@AbdulazizNasif

Жыл бұрын

@@dinopalavra876 did you read his response to kawthari?

You have ruined me😂 best thing i heard for a long time.. respect bro Hijab

45:00 dear brother Hijab The Ash’ari position is - we affirm the ayah as it is but at the same time exclude meanings which would indicate that Allah ta ala consists of parts or a body, or that his saat is located in a place etc. And you can read it basically in Ash’ari work. I think you should check it brother for the next time to correct yourself.

@jamworthy14

Жыл бұрын

thats exactly what hijab said but better lol. hijab

@vol94

10 ай бұрын

Yeah, as an ashari I also affirm the attribute of yad for Allah as befits His majesty, but I do not translate yad as hand because that would be to make taweel (interpretation of it) and surah imran verse 7 is clear that you cannot make taweel of the mutashabihat (ambiguous verses). Now ofc in tafsir at tabri imam at tabri narrates multiple chains from hazrat Abdullah ibn abbas where he says the yad means the power of Allah, so I accept that as one possible meaning because it is narrated from the faremost mufasirin among the sahaba, but I do not limit the attribute to this. At the end of the day, believe in all the mutashabiat verses and leave their meaning to Allah. It is that simple

according to your description of asharism which is accepting tafwidh and tawil and that neo salafis think more scripturally to the point it flirt with anthropomorphism, and then mentionning the fact that ibn abbas and others did tawil of some verses ........... all of this is proving mroe and more asharism is nearer to the truth, or at least more humble to accept many opinions in contrast to neo salafis

In regards to Al Baqillani , he refutes Allah being in a direction in Al Insaf .

@aljabartiyy58

Жыл бұрын

Imam al-Baqillaniy (one of the great Asharis) said in his book al-'Insaf page 65: "And we do not say that the ^arsh (throne) is a place of settlement or rest for Allah, because Allah existed and there was no place, and when He created the place, He did not change". He also said: "Allah is clear from being in directions, or resembling the creations, and also He is not attributed with transformation or movement, nor with standing or sitting, because such attributes are of the creations, and Allah (the creator) is clear from that". يقول القاضي أبو بكر محمد بن الطيب بن محمد بن جعفر بن قاسم، البصري، ثم البغدادي، ابن الباقلاني.328 هـ 402 هـ المالكي الأشعري ما نصه "ولا نقول إن العرش له- أي الله- قرار ولا مكان، لأن الله تعالى كان ولا مكان، فلما خلق المكان لم يتغير عما كان" اهـ. وقال أيضا ما نصه: "ويجب أن يعلم أن كل ما يدل على الحدوث أو على سمة النقص فالرب تعالى يتقدس عنه، فمن ذلك: أنه تعالى متقدس عن الاختصاص بالجهات، والاتصاف بصفات المحدثات، وكذلك لا يوصف بالتحول والانتقال، ولا القيام ولا القعود، ولأن هذه الصفات تدل على الحدوث، والله تعالى يتقدس عن ذلك" اهـ. That's the creed of al-Baqillaniy who reported the creed of the Salaf and Khalaf, which is the creed of the Prophet and the companions.

we miss you brother

The Hanafis are mostly Maturidhis. They were/are from Turkey, Central Asian states, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Asia and traditional hanafis from Europe as they were on the path of the Ottomans. Today some are influenced by Asharism. I think what you mean is they systemised/codified it and it became famous in the time of the Imams. Like in the Hanafi mazhab it is considered the codified teaching of ibn Mas'ud, Ali ibn abi Talib and Umar ibn Alkhatab (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them). As for the early muslims, the Mutazillah and others existed in that time, so it is true there were people that weren't mujassimah. And even their disagreement on Hasan al Basri wasn't on the issue of the non literalism when it came to Allah (it actually implies Hasan al Basri and his group weren't literalists), rather it was on whether a sinner is a disbeliever.

@markjapan4062

Жыл бұрын

NO SUCH THING AS ISLAM MUSLIMS OR IMAMS SORRY

@Ryan-lf6ds

Жыл бұрын

@@markjapan4062 Give yo head a shake, dk head.

@wreakhavoc1680

Жыл бұрын

@@markjapan4062 when u die,if not dead already...ur in for a surprise

@abdullahassaffah

8 ай бұрын

​@@markjapan4062this proves your ignorance

@abdullahassaffah

8 ай бұрын

Original hanafis were from Iraq kufa

BARAKALLAHU FEEKUM! ☝🏼🤍

I trust you brother.

Would love to see a conversation between Muhammad Hijab and Sh. Atabek on this topic.

@ARmirzaful

Жыл бұрын

Anyone in New York should address him as hazrat hijaab or mufti niqaab

@sleeptherapy4811

4 ай бұрын

Lol! Afabek is a joke.

@sleeptherapy4811

4 ай бұрын

Lol! Afabek is a joke.

@sleeptherapy4811

4 ай бұрын

Lol! Afabek is a joke.

@sleeptherapy4811

4 ай бұрын

Lol! Afabek is a joke.

The deoband institute is not ashari- inclined but rather maturidi-inclined.

@Afanottrippin

Жыл бұрын

True, deobandiyyah is in fiqh hanafi and in aqeeda maturidi

42:40 Most of the things bin Taymiyya spoke about - the Sahabah never mentioned or talked about it.

@user-vy3hb7ir6o

4 ай бұрын

If this is true, how could his way possibly represent theirs?! (as claimed by some)

I think al-radd ala aljahmiyya is Abdullah ibn Ahmed ibn hanbal book he wrote it after he’s father died

This talk was very balanced. Each side mistakes was pointed out and a neutral standpoint indeed.

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

@MohammadQasim

Жыл бұрын

@@zccau2316 If you understood the discussions who would have to admit salaf didnt delve deeply upon philosophical matters. Its a later enquiry. Do you agree?

@cesarborgia9240

Жыл бұрын

@@zccau2316 ibn hajar and anawawi are asharis? you sure?

@ryugalaw

Жыл бұрын

@@cesarborgia9240 yes Ibn Hajar and An-Nawawi are Ashaaris

@lumiam6982

Жыл бұрын

@@cesarborgia9240 Ibn Hajar (RA) and Al Nawawi (RA) identified themselves as Asha'ari, lmao. Salafis even claim Al Suyuti (RA) and Al Bayhaqi weren't Asha'ari just because they were Ahlul Hadeeth. They all claim to follow Imam Asha'ari (RA) in creed. I know it'll surprise you but even Ibn Kathir (RA) and Al Dhahab (RA) were Asha'ari too. Proof? Ibn Kathir (RA) called himself an Asha'ari and taught in the Asha'ari university and Al Dhahabi made a book criticizing the creed of Ibn Taymiyyah (RA). The senior Salafi scholars even condemned both of their creed for being similar to Asha'ari.

You contradicted yourself multiple times I couldn’t keep track. You believe the early generations knew the clear language ie apparent meaning on Allah rose above the throne? But you also admitted that Harb Al Kirmani was refuted for saying Allah moves. Same with Ahmad and Bukhari rejected Allah moving. So it’s not apparent meaning. Because the apparent meaning is movement. Make up your mind. Later on in this recording you ironically said “the Athari position is we know what it means, but we don’t know what it means in relation to Allah’’. Okay so that’s essentially tafwidh otherwise an oxymoron. Either you know what it means or you don’t. You also misrepresented asharis/maturidis. Non of the them deny the text that Allah is above the arsh. Imam Ahmad and Bukhari are correct that it doesn’t mean movement.

@Nox-02

Жыл бұрын

Good points bro even though i like hijab he should study with our shuyukh before making these videos about aqaid

@lifestransitory1

Жыл бұрын

@@Nox-02 Exactly. He also contradicted himself another time when he suggested “Bukharis Khalq afāl Al ibād” where Bukhari quoted Salaf. But then he also said that sahaba isn’t hujjah according to opinions mentioned by Ibn Qudama. In which case suggesting Bukharis book becomes meaningless. Also those texts are for scholars not for random obtuse laymen. It’s an embarrassment. Considering hijabs meant to be one of the top dawah guys.

@Sheen023

Жыл бұрын

.

@Nox-02

Жыл бұрын

@@lifestransitory1 I can understand that he leans towards the athari madhab, but he shouldn’t make aproximations and such claims. However I can see that he try at least be honest about our history and that there is a before and after ibn taymiyya in the hanbali madhab. And that in our madhab there is a lot of ibn taymiyya

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

44:07 10/29/22 - 2-50PM +6 1:24:00

Directions were created by Allah jal jalaluhu, he existed before directions and since muslims beleive that Allah subhanahu wa taala created the throne and the throne has limits, the space above the throne is not a void. Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him said that above the throne there’s a book where it is written:” إن رحمتي سبقت غضبي" which means the features of God’s mercy outnumber those of his wrath. So for someone to say that Allah subhanahhu taala is in a direction above the throne is saying he now shares that place with that book. Allah jala jalaluhu exists before creating directions, and after creating them, he does not need them. So the meaning of (الرحمٰن على العرش استوى ) should be understood with what’s befitting to Allah, he established authority over the biggest creation, and by extension over everything smaller than it. Istawa means قهر، حفظ and 13 other meanings in Arabic, and no one should use a meaning from those that would have someone imagine that Allah jal jalaluhu needs a direction or place to exist. Solid bodies like books, trees, people, planets need a place and direction to exist, soft bodies like the wind, light, the soul need a place to exist. But Allah subhabahu wa taala created these attributes and things and directions, he does not change after creating them or become bound by them, subhanahu wa taala.

@haghuro9843

2 ай бұрын

Can I have the reference for a book being above the throne?

"My dad is bigger than your dad" 🙈😹 thats how some ppl behave

@Faithfulresonance1

Жыл бұрын

What part is that

@MohammadQasim

Жыл бұрын

@@Faithfulresonance1 cant remember, got to watch all to catch it 😉

@hamzatniyi3541

Жыл бұрын

@@Faithfulresonance1 The beginning part

Assalamualaikum, I have many comments on the lecture, but one of the basic things I suggest correction of is that the virtue of a person from history is not about how smart they were or how many books they had but about whether they got it right or not.

THAT WAS A GOOD DIALOGUE

Mohammad Hijab if he has time do deep dive about Maturidi school of thought. Invite Deobandi and Bralvi in separate segments also invite Shaykh Hasan Ali about history of this school of thought.

The UK has a treasure and it's called Muhammad Hijab

After a disclosure that I am Hanafi, here is a comment: from the presented information, it seems like there is a discrepancy between what the neosalafis believe about the positions of the Hanbali school and ulama and the reality on the other side. You suggested some sources for those who want to study the real salafism. The question here is, if it is so hard to study salafism and since there is no mazhab that would teach this doctrine, how people suppose to conduct their daily lives firmly rooted in knowledge in case they are not ulama ? That means being a salafi for most of the people would be that they will fall in different groupings and this will cause discord among them selves and with the wider communities. And we see that this is already the case.

@koroglurustem1722

Жыл бұрын

We should know that we will not be asked about what we believe about Allah in detail (whether He takes space or time, etc). We just take what Quran and Sunnah give us and beyond them, whatever the scholars say is speculation. For the jurisprudence, we have well defined sunni schools which everyone accepts all 4 as valid. Khalas! Hadiths and the methodology of schools direct us to trusting the concensus among scholars. In specific matters like talaq/divorce, we follow concensus, not the private views of individual scholars.

@koroglurustem1722

Жыл бұрын

I mean, there's no need to hold one aqeedah mazhab and deny others. That is sectarianism! These precise matters and positions of kalam are not the issues that will save us. I am sure many sahabah didn't have detailed understanding of these issues which people hold against each other nowadays. It's a sickness to divide the ummah by the egotistical drive of nafs to claim 'I am right, you are wrong'.

@facetofloor

Жыл бұрын

@@koroglurustem1722 If a person believes that Allah takes up time or space, then he is a kaafir, and will be regarded as such in the Hereafter.

@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273

Ай бұрын

I recommend you to watch video of yasir qadhi about the origin of sifat controversy

السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُ​هُ Assalamu’​alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatu​h

What's your school of thought in jurisprudence and creed?

@Soloman827

Жыл бұрын

He is an athari in creed and hanbali in jurisprudence

@malikakajee4396

Жыл бұрын

@@Soloman827 thanks for your informations.

@UltimateFreekickerzdok

Жыл бұрын

@@malikakajee4396 brother information is singular, so you don't add the 's'= informations

@malikakajee4396

Жыл бұрын

@@UltimateFreekickerzdok thank you for correction

@UltimateFreekickerzdok

Жыл бұрын

@@malikakajee4396 No problem:)

reminder to say Alhamdullillah, AstagfiruAllah, Allahu Akbar 🤍

Totally wrong statement. Moroccan Arabic is not a mixture of Arabic and 4 or 5 European languages. Moroccan Arabic is predominantly and heavily influenced by the indegiouness Berber (Amazigh) languages. Even Saudi dialect is influenced by European words, most Arabs say Telephoon or bye bye or oxygeen (oxygen) and name it. It is a often heard misconception. The French influence is only heard in the capital and mostly spoken by the Liberal secular Moroccans who have an inferiority complex. The overwhelming majority of Morocco does not. You even have areas where the Berber population doesn't speak Arabic till this day subhanallah.

@mohammedabdirrahmanrubblei9141

Жыл бұрын

Calm down brother... I visited maghrib and hardly understood a thing

@dpireader32

Жыл бұрын

@@mohammedabdirrahmanrubblei9141 wether you understand or not is not the point I was making. I was not talking about understanding it, I was talking about that Moroccan (and Algerian) Arabic is heavily influenced by the Amazigh language. European influence is just recent. Also you still have areas where the people only speak Berber/Tamazight and no Arabic.

@irfanm5892

2 ай бұрын

Calm down. Those influence happened in the modern era

@oussamaboulazhar1255

7 күн бұрын

Moroccan arabic heavily uses old arabic words that aren't even remembered anymore, the rest of it is tachel7it and only a small portion is french or spanish.

I'm a very common Muslim. Don't know deeply about Islam. And didn't understand many of the concepts. My question to Sir Muhammad Hijab is “ Are Asari Maturidi part of Ahlus sunnah wal jamaah?” “Yes or No” I grew up in a Maturidi environment and now I’m trying to explore Islam and in the concept of Aqidah, I’m confused now. Am I Muslim or in 72 deviant sects?

Mashallah great work. I like hijab bro. Deobandi scholars are maturidi❤❤❤❤

In 1hr 8mins onwards you talk about how the Asharis produced big timers because they faced huge challenges towards Islam. It also seems that many of the Muslims were also in expanding Islam and facing so many different ideas, could this therefore shape the way Asharis are because of what they faced where as many of the Atharis based in Saudi didn't meant hardly any challenges and therefore view things in a complete different (maybe) simplistic view?

@businessisboomin7252

Жыл бұрын

Interesting approach.

@Hastenforthedawm

Жыл бұрын

Salafi-Athari are stuck beating in the same drum of reacting to the Mu'tazilla (and the Shia as well). That seems to be the limits of their intellectual scope. The other schools of Aqeedah face much more broader hermeneutic questions and are not reactionary schools to single issues. There is a reason that Atharis and Maturidis have always been the majority in Islam. Reactionary Aqeedah is only useful in the context it emerges but does not apply to all situations. The Salafi-Athari school are only really useful in when philosophical imports (mainly Greek) started imposing on the Deen. In response, going fully down the Athari way helped get rid of the Mu'tazilla. But the Atharis don't have much of a use or appeal outside of that.

@diefaust4252

7 ай бұрын

@@Hastenforthedawm would you say in the time of revelation the prophetic method was quite reactionary intellectually?

I missed a bit more of objectivity rather than brother Hijab telling us why atharism is better...

@stati5tik

Жыл бұрын

Being inclined towards your position doesnt make someone objective.

@abdul-hadidadkhah1459

Жыл бұрын

@@stati5tik neither does one inclining to their own position, hence why OP was seeking more objectivity.

@monkey7558

Жыл бұрын

What if the objective truth is that one position is better

Brother hijab… lalakai and ibn batta are not hujja we all agree but there books are the sayings and ijmaa of people before them that’s why it’s important

did Ibn Taymiyah's creedal positions same as the athari school?

@Nox-02

Жыл бұрын

There is a spectrum in atharism bro even all the hanbalis dont agree with all his principles you have to understand that

@koshinaden263

Жыл бұрын

@@Nox-02 trying to talk there isnt one in the ahlul kalam creeds

@user-vy3hb7ir6o

4 ай бұрын

Syed, Ibn Taymiyyah does not represent that school. Ibn Al-Jawzi, and As-Saffarini do.

The Deobandis are Maturidi not Ashari.

Assalam Aleikum brother, please kindly put this in written.

About Imam Ghazali's tasawuf, he was a sufi even before he left his position and life as it was. Why were the majority of ulama interested in sufizm ? Well you see how as soon as a person knows something and people start coming for advise they praise the person and assume he is the perfect believer? This will cause inflation of the ego end destruction. Same for the great rulers in history like Malik Nuruddin, Sultan Salahuddin, Sultan Mehmed Fatih etc. They all had sufi Shaykhs to purify their heart and intention, give them strength in the struggle in the darkest of the night and humility and to be grateful to Allah swt when he gives the victory.

I'm not a scholar, just presenting a scene - I grew up knowing that we follow Hanafi school and there are other 3 schools which all are okay and right. ( Bangladesh ).... In BD , in very recent time we had a very infuencial scholar named DR ABDULLAH JAHANGIR - he himself was a salafi ( we call them Ahle Hadith ) - he studied at KSA. In his lectures, he never said bad any bad things about us - Majhab followers, in fact - he said TO FOLLOW A MADHAB if you are not an alim. We Loved the shaikh very much! He wrote a Bangla Explanation of Al-Fiqhul Akbar,.... I mean - We never had any issue with these creeds. Yes, there are some Grave worshippers - but trust me, mainstream muslims - mostly hanafi - tell directly that this is shirk ( not calling the followers mushrik, please see the differences ) - and these Grave Business are more BUISINESS than RELIGION. We respect the Deoband, most of our fiqhi fatwas we seek from the deoband. Our QAOMI MADARASAS are following the Deobandi Syllabus. And I never heard any Hanafi Scholar of our time calling the salafis DEVIENT , yes, sometimes they call them misguided - logic is - no one person can master all the hadith and tafsir knowledge so in the end of the day you have to follow an Imam, So better follow the Already established schools, but yeah - people like Sir Abdullah Jahangir ( Shaikh Passed away btw - may Allah have mercy on him ) - they sometimes gave masayil from their knowledge, . Sad thing is, we dont see same kind of Respect from the alhe hadith / salafis, they in some places have different masjids, and Some of western ( as well as Local ) SALAFI Scholars consider us to be OUT OF AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMAH, that is just sad. We all are following sunnah by our own understanding , arent we ? I hope, in coming days, when MUSLIMS are oppressed everywhere, we can get over our sect-love and act as ONE UMMAH. May Allah forgive us all.

@justtostudylol5711

Жыл бұрын

Brother well said . Couldn't have said it better. They(salafis / ahle hadees) try to bash us with our understandings . They don't know about deobandi and they mix up with barelvis and say us we are misguided

@TheMercifulAndJust

Жыл бұрын

Anyone who says that a Muslim calling other than Allah while affirming that only Allah is in control of all things as a Mushrik is committing a major felony.

@ismail_ali998

Жыл бұрын

​@@TheMercifulAndJust by looking at your channel, you look like someone who's an arab/middle eastern person of Sunni Sufi Ashari background. I just wanted to ask you this, how do you look at the Deobandi and Barelvi split between South Asian Hanafis? Because coming from a neutral perspective and a South Asian myself, what I've observed so far is that Arab/Middle Eastern Sufis are almost exactly like the Barelvis of South Asia in their various practices and beliefs. So what's your opinion on Deobandi vs Barelvi spilt?

@TheMercifulAndJust

5 ай бұрын

@@ismail_ali998 Brother Ismail just today (6 months later) I saw this reply of yours. I see they both complete one another, and the finer truth lies within both of them. Some labels thrown at each other can be as result of where they are at with respect to the spectrum of knowledge and degree of their maturity and their environment, their approach and perspective, and what they want to protect with respect to the larger community under their responsibility.

The statement you made from 10:00 minutes onwards is just absurd. You said that in the first 2 hundred years there weren’t Ashari/Maturidi creeds. But those creeds were present within the first 300 years ie born around (250 H). That’s what’s important. Because the Hadith “the best of generations is mine then those after them then those after them”. The Messenger didn’t say first 200 years as your assertion. Nor were they in the 400’s. Also, if we consider this for arguments sake then 4 madhabs weren’t present in the time of the Prophet. So we go directly to the Prophet? Nonsense. And stop trying to portray the Hanbali Madthab as the earliest. As all the other imams Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafii were all before him. In fact Imam Ahmad was last. Ibn Qudamah mentions statements from Ahmad and Shafii as doing tafwidh. Unless you want to deny your own imams or imply they’re not trustworthy in their writings. Same as Abu Ya’ala.

@Sheen023

Жыл бұрын

.

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

ALSO The point about ashari creed developing into something more 'rational' or 'more away from Quran and Sunnah' is as far from the truth as one can state. Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and Sayuti for example all came AFTER Al-Razi. Two of the above-mentioned even wrote books against logic. If anything later Asharites became more ahlul-hadith once beliefs were codified. This orientalist view of Asharism needs to stop.

@cesarborgia9240

Жыл бұрын

This comment is such a mess, you're conflicting a lot of informations and many matters like comparing fiqh with aqeedah, abu hanifa wasn't a mturidi nor shafi was an Ashari! Since these schools founded by indivsiuals came way after them 😂😂😂😂😂, the four imams or let's say our salaf in the three first generations held the same position as Atharis today, except maybe minor differences here n there, but none of them share the same views as the maturidis or Asharis today.

@zccau2316

Жыл бұрын

@@dinopalavra876 great point

@lifestransitory1

Жыл бұрын

@@cesarborgia9240 The brother already highlighted one of your misunderstanding. Abu Hanifa and Imam Shafii were as much Maturidi and Ashari as Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali rah were labeled Hanafi Maliki Shafii and Hanbali 🤦🏻‍♂️ And no one said that Abu Hanifa was Maturidi. It’s the opposite. That Maturidis base their creed on Abu Hanifa and Tahawis codified text. Just as the neo salafis think they’re basing their beliefs on Imam Ahmad. But Ahmad wasn’t even born when Abu Hanifa was around. So we are the earliest most authentic according to your own standards. You also fail to see that your comment actually backfires. Because if those madhabs were “Atharis” [as you stated] then you’re conceding that the basis of Maturidi/Ashari is Athari.

Actually deobandi school is weak in ilm ul kalaam in indian subcontinent Barelvis are strong in kalam

@abuyahya6254

Жыл бұрын

Berelvism concept of hazir and nazir is not the aqeedah of al azhar sharif misr.

@user-vy3hb7ir6o

4 ай бұрын

Sayyed, both are Maturidis! Let's take the hand of our brothers and help each other.

Invite Shaykh Asrar Rashid for a discussion on ilm ul Kalam

@bonez_206

9 ай бұрын

Im afraid he has too much ego to get schooled

Shockingly pink shirt. Amazing talk though. Extremely juicy and interesting.

8:33, Really so why the prophet Salla Allahu alayhi tested a female servant when he asked her "where is Allah ?" and she said : above the heaven (fee al samaa), and then he freed her ? Is there more "layman" than a female servant ? the hadith : Mu'awiya b. al-Hakam said: While I was praying with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), a man in the company sneezed. I said: Allah have mercy on you! The people stared at me with disapproving looks, so I said: Woe be upon me, why is it that you stare at me? They began to strike their hands on their thighs, and when I saw them urging me to observe silence (I became angry) but I said nothing. When the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) had said the prayer (and I declare that neither before him nor after him have I seen a leader who gave better instruction than he for whom I would give my father and mother as ransom). I swear that he did not scold, beat or revile me but said: Talking to persons is not fitting during the prayer, for it consists of glorifying Allah, declaring his Greatness. and recitation of the Qur'an or words to that effect. I said: Messenger of Allah. I was till recently a pagan, but Allah has brought Islam to us; among us there are men who have recourse to Kahins. He said, Do not have recourse to them. I said. There are men who take omens. That is something which they find in their breasts, but let it not turn their way (from freedom of action). I said: Among us there are men who draw lines. He said: There was a prophet who drew lines, so if they do it as they did, that is allowable. I had a maid-servant who tended goats by the side of Uhud and Jawwaniya. One day I happened to pass that way and found that a wolf had carried a goat from her flock. I am after all a man from the posterity of Adam. I felt sorry as they (human beings) feel sorry. So I slapped her. I came to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and felt (this act of mine) as something grievous I said: Messenger of Allah, should I not grant her freedom? He (the Holy Prophet) said: Bring her to me. So I brought her to him. He said to her: Where is Allah? She said: He is in the heaven. He said: Who am I? She said: Thou art the Messenger of Allah. He said: Grant her freedom, she is a believing woman. (Sahih Muslim : 537 a)

@fifafreebies8941

Жыл бұрын

Where is Allāh? A question which our Salafī brothers often ask and mistakenly deem it a creedal matter. I want to clarify this issue with the following important points, Inshā’Allāh: 1. There is only one incident in the authentic narrations where the Prophet ﷺ asked this question from a slave girl. This narration is a solitary narration (Khabr wāḥid) that has been reported with various different words. 2. In the narration of Imām Muslim the words of the Prophet ﷺ are: ‘Where is Allah?’, to which the slave girl replied في السماء - He is in the heavens. However, in other authentic reports, the Prophet ﷺ asked her: ‘Do you bear witness that there is no God but Allah?’. And in one narration he ﷺ asked: ‘Who is your Rabb?’. So there are different wordings of this incident and it’s definitively not proven that the words ‘Where is Allah’ are the *only* authentic transmission of the incident. 3. For arguments sake, we will give preference to the narration of Muslim due to its rigorous nature. Thus, then know that the narration in Muslim has been mentioned by Imām Muslim in the section pertaining to *Ṣalāh* and not *Īmān*. Most of the narration is to do with prayer, and this incident has been mentioned as *part* of the entire narration. 4. The slave girl replied that Allāh is in the heavens, to which the Prophet ﷺ said to the companion: ‘free her for indeed she is a مؤمنة (believer)’. Now, the important question here is that would anyone - including our Salafī interlocutor - accept that a person will enter the fold of Islam merely by saying that Allāh is in the heavens without the declaration of shahādah? Of course not. Even our Salafī brothers regard the shahādah as a sine quo non to enter faith. But in this narration there is no mention of the slave girl giving her declaration. 5. Keeping the aforesaid point in mind, it is clear that the Prophet ﷺ wanted to ascertain a *sign* from her to determine whether she is a believer. Why? The answer is that some narrations (Abū Dāwūd, Aḥmad, etc) postulate that she couldn’t speak. Hence, instead of saying Allāh is in the heavens, she pointed (أشارت) at the heavens. The owner of this slave girl, a companion, was having difficulty knowing whether she was a believer due to the fact that she couldn’t speak. So he brought the case to the Prophet ﷺ. Otherwise if she could speak, it would have been easy for the companion to determine this matter by asking her himself without taking her to the Prophet ﷺ. 6. How did the Prophet ﷺ ascertain a sign of her īmān by asking her this question? The likes of Imām Al-Nawawī, et al., explain that, since she couldn’t speak, she pointed at the heavens which meant that she supplicated to Allāh and not the idols of the ground. The sky is the *direction* of the داعي (supplicator) just as the direction of the one praying Ṣalāh is the Ka’ba. In fact, the Prophet ﷺ said: When one of you offers Ṣalāh, they should not spit in front of them, for indeed Allāh is in front of them when they pray (Bukhārī). And in one narration it is mentioned that Allāh is between him and the Qibla. Despite facing the Ka’ba in prayer, and despite the fact that the one praying is *speaking* to Allāh, and despite the fact that copious authentic narrations apparently suggest that Allāh is in that direction, and despite the fact that the Ka’ba is the *House of Allah*, NO ONE believes that Allāh is in the Ka’ba or in that direction. Hence, just as Allāh is not in the Ka’ba, He is not in the heavens too! 7. In addition, our Salafī brothers who take this narration literally, without any interpretation or contextualisation, cannot remain consistent in explaining verses of the Quran such as ‘He (Allāh) is with you wherever you are…’; ‘And We are nearer to him than his jugular vein’, amongst many other verses like this. 8. So why point at the sky when referring to Allāh? The summary of the detailed answer given by the polymath, Imām Al-Ghazālī, is that true reverence of Allāh is with the heart and the actions of the body limbs are indicative to that reverence and acknowledgment of the lofty status. The maximum a person can show of Allāh’s high status with their body is indicating to the heavens. As we sometimes say, ‘the person is in the sky’. Meaning, they have a high status. And, yes, this kind of indication is natural and intuitive. But it doesn’t mean that Allāh is literally in the sky. This is a very short summary of Imām Al-Ghazālī’s lengthy answer. 9. The methodology of the people of Sunnah is simple: Imām Al-Nawawī has transmitted a consensus from Qāḍī ʿIyāḍ that the texts that postulate a direction, or place, etc., for Allāh will be given an appropriate interpretation. And in this way one remains consistent and faithful to the Book of Allāh. 10. In summation, Allāh exists without any place. Prophet ﷺ said: ‘Allāh existed and nothing (including place and direction) existed apart from Him’ (Bukhārī). Place, locus and directions are all creations and He is the only Creator - it is rationally impossible for the Creator to dwell into His creation. تلك عشرة كاملة

@debiandebian7721

Жыл бұрын

@@fifafreebies8941 What you are saying is off topic. He was saying that for a layman it's not important to know the important points of islamic aqeedah in details. According to him, you just have to know the 6 pillars of faith. So i gave the hadith of the female servant who was tested and freed based on a specific point of aqeedah, which is not about the 6 pillars in general. Concerning the fact that Allah is really above his Throne... Lol this is why, for example, abu Hatim al Razy and abu Zur'ah al Razy (two great scholars of hadith) said, in the aqeedah they trasmitted to abu Hatim's son, Abdurahman (an another great scholar of hadith), that all imams they met are agreed upon the fact that Allah is above His Throne, separate from his creation" (wa inna Allah ala arshihi ba'in min khalqih) This is why Harb ibn Isma'il al Kirmany, who wrote a book of aqeedah in which he brings the ijma of the salaf, said that Allah is a above (alaa) his Throne, above (fawqa) the seven skies. (wa huwa alaa al arsh fawqa al samaa° al saabi3ah) This is why imam al Bukhary has a chapter in his Sahih (hadith 7418), in which he brings the meaning of the word "istiwa" as explained by the tabi'in : قَالَ أَبُو الْعَالِيَةِ: {اسْتَوَى إِلَى السَّمَاءِ} ارْتَفَعَ، {فَسَوَّاهُنَّ} خَلَقَهُنَّ. وَقَالَ مُجَاهِدٌ: {اسْتَوَى} عَلاَ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ. وَقَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ الْمَجِيدُ الْكَرِيمُ، وَالْوَدُودُ الْحَبِيبُ. يُقَالُ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ كَأَنَّهُ فَعِيلٌ مِنْ مَاجِدٍ، مَحْمُودٌ مِنْ حَمِيدٍ. This is why imam al Bukhary wrote a book called "khalq af'al al ibad" (a book wrote to refute the aqeedah of the jahmiyyah) in which he quote the statement of Abdallah ibn al Mubarak about this issue. Abdallah ibn al Mubarak (died in 180 hijry) said : we don't say like the jahmmiyah : "Allah is here (on earth), but He is above His Throne. Someone said to him : "how we know Allah ?". Abdullah ibn al Mubarak said : "Allah is above (fawqa) the skies, above (alaa) His Throne" ﻭَﻗَﺎﻝَ اﺑْﻦُ اﻟْﻤُﺒَﺎﺭَﻙِ: «ﻻَ ﻧَﻘُﻮﻝُ ﻛَﻤَﺎ ﻗَﺎﻟَﺖِ اﻟْﺠَﻬْﻤِﻴَّﺔُ ﺇِﻧَّﻪُ ﻓِﻲ اﻷَْﺭْﺽِ ﻫَﻬُﻨَﺎ، ﺑَﻞْ ﻋَﻠَﻰ اﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ اﺳْﺘَﻮَﻯ» ، ﻭَﻗِﻴﻞَ ﻟَﻪُ: ﻛَﻴْﻒَ ﺗَﻌْﺮِﻑُ ﺭَﺑَّﻨَﺎ؟ ﻗَﺎﻝَ: «ﻓَﻮْﻕَ ﺳَﻤَﺎﻭَاﺗِﻪِ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻋﺮﺷﻪ There is an authentic addition narrated by al Darimy ("al radd ala al jahmiyyah") and the son of imam Ahmad (in his book of aqeedah : '"al sunnah"), which is : "Allah is above his throne, separate from his creation." ﻧَﻌْﺮِﻑُ ﺭَﺑَّﻨَﺎ ﻋَﺰَّ ﻭَﺟَﻞَّ ﻓَﻮْﻕَ ﺳَﺒْﻊِ ﺳَﻤَﺎﻭَاﺕٍ ﻋَﻠَﻰ اﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ ﺑﺎﺋﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ This is why Imam al Tirmidhy said in his sunan : Allah's knowledge (ilm), his capacity (qudrah) and his sultan (i don't how to translate) is in every place (makan), and He is above the heaven. (sunan al tirmidhy : 3298) عِلْمُ اللَّهِ وَقُدْرَتُهُ وَسُلْطَانُهُ فِي كُلِّ مَكَانٍ وَهُوَ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ كَمَا وَصَفَ فِي كِتَابِهِ

@Ersilay

Жыл бұрын

@@debiandebian7721 The simple fact that you quote both the Raziyayn and Bukhari in the same comment shows that your knowledge is from the internet. Imam Bukhari was a kullabi. The incident between him and the raziyayn proves it. Yet you're reliant upon him to transmit credal matters?...

@zakyzayn5361

Жыл бұрын

Hafiz Abdullah b. Muhammad al-Harari states the following in his book titled “Sharhus Siratul Mustaqim”: The hadith about the female slave is not sound due to two reasons. 1. This hadith is a mudtarib (confused) hadith because there are narrations of it that are different from one another. 2. That hadith is contrary to the rules of methodology because, according to the rules of our religion, a person who utters kalima ash-shahadah becomes a believer and a Muslim. As a matter of fact, in the hadith narrated by 15 Companions, the Prophet (pbuh) says, “I have been ordered to fight until people witness that there is no god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah.” If the hadith “Where is Allah?” is accepted according to its apparent meaning, it is contrary to mutawatir hadiths. In that case, it is either interpreted or rejected because hadith scholars reject hadiths that are contrary to mutawatir hadiths and that cannot be interpreted. The following question can come to mind at that point: - Imam Bukhari narrated the hadith of the female slave mentioned above. How can we not accept a hadith narrated by Imam Bukhari as sound? We answer it as follows: Imam Bukhari did not include that hadith in his Sahih. He included it in his book named “Khalqu Af’alil-Ibad”. He did not say, “All the hadiths in this book are valid.” Besides, Imam Bukhari accepts that some hadiths in his Sahih as weak. He wrote those hadiths without a chain of narrators to indicate that they were weak. We explained that issue in our works about hadith defense. Those who wish can refer to it. We have proved the following points so far in this part: 1. The hadith about the female slave is weak because there is idtirab in the hadith. 2. The Prophet (pbuh) did not ask anyone except that female slave the question “Where is Allah?” That is the only hadith with that question. 3. The questions the Prophet (pbuh) asked were “Who is your Lord?” and “Who am I?” In addition, he wanted his addressees to utter kalima ash-shahadah. 4. The hadith about the female slave is contrary to the rules of methodology because, according to the rules of our religion, a person who utters kalima ash-shahadah becomes a believer and a Muslim. After all those explanations, if Some one still insist and say, “No, we act based on the hadith about the female slave”, we will give them a different explanation: We say to them: Even if you accept the hadith about the female slave as sound, it does not prove that Allah is in the sky. For, the Prophet (pbuh) asked اَيْنَ اللَّهُ. The word اَيْنَ in Arabic is not used only for space (place). It is used for both space and glory, that is, fame. So, the question can be in the form of “Where is Allah’s glory?” instead of “Where is Allah?” When the female slave said, “in the sky”, she meant, “His position is very high.” As a matter of fact, when Arabs say, “The place of so and so is in the sky”, they neither mean the sky nor to occupy a place there. They mean the loftiness of that person’s glory with that statement. Many scholars like Imam Razi (Asasut Taqdis), Hafiz Subki (as-Sayfus Saqil), Imam Qurtubi (at-Tadhkar), Imam Nawawi (Sharhu Sahihi Muslim) Imam Suyuti (Sharhu Sunani Tirmidhi) Imam Abu Hayyan Andulusi (Tafsir al-Bahrul Muhit), Hafiz Asqalani (Risalah al- Qazwini) interpreted the word اَيْنَ in the hadith as glory, that is, fame. If you ignore the idtirab in the hadith, if you do not heed the hadith scholars’ statement, “That hadith is weak” and even if you accept that hadith as sound, you cannot prove that Allah is in the sky because we can interpret the word اَيْنَ in the hadith as glory since it is a style used by Arabs.

@zakyzayn5361

Жыл бұрын

Bonous: In practical legal matters, conjecture [dhan] is sufficient as a basis of obligation. In this case, solitary hadith may well establish a rule of law. However, in matters of belief - scholars of creed only accept such hadith if it is free of contradictory evidence and the conditions are satisfied. With respect to the aforementioned hadith of the slave girl, the conditions are not satisfied on the basis that there are various narrations of the hadith. One narration in the Muwatta' of Malik states that the slave girl was black and that when the Messenger of God questioned her; he said "Do you testify that there is no god but Allah?" She said, "Yes." He asked, "Do you testify Muhammad is the Messenger of God?" She said, "Yes." He went on, "Do you believe in the resurrection after death?" She replied, "Yes." The Messenger of God said, "Free her."* In other versions, the slave girl cannot speak, but merely points to the sky in answer. Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani said of the various versions of the hadith, "There is great contradiction in the wording." Given the conflicting versions, there is a strong possibility that it has been related merely in terms of what one or more narrators understood, and hence one of the versions is not adequate to establish a point of belief. *Muwatta' under the chapter Setting Free and Wala '-9 / 322.

If you’re not defending any “principles” and you just want to look at the quotes from the salaf, how do you determine WHO from the salaf we take from? Why did you prefer Tabari over X or Y if you have no principles to determine whether Tabari is correct? There were also people who were misguided in the time of the salaf but we have principles to determine who had the right aqida and who didn’t. Hijab is often logical but here it seems he was a bit all over the place unfortunately.

@Sheen023

Жыл бұрын

What do you suggest?

@cesarborgia9240

Жыл бұрын

Agreed, the lecture was anything but clear and presice.

@Kalam18595

Жыл бұрын

@@Sheen023 have principles to know who Allah is. After you know the truth then you’ll know the men of the truth, whatever time period they’re in.

@millatiibrahim2416

Жыл бұрын

He was talking about sahaabah here. Anybody who chooses later peoples opinions over an authentic explanation of a Companion, has built a house like a spiders Web.

@ninaaden8338

Жыл бұрын

@@millatiibrahim2416 lol. Islam did not begin and end with the honorable companions. Simple as that.

لا إله إلا الله

Interesting enough. At this point in time, this video has more comments than likes. 💬

@homtanks7259

Жыл бұрын

Not anymore

@AbdulazizNasif

Жыл бұрын

Asharis and Maturedis crying in the comments even though he was pretty soft to them