Looking forward to some beautiful images from the Webb telescope! 🙂👍🏻

@whateveryousay5674

2 жыл бұрын

James Webb telescope is the future!

@shridharhaldankar7254

2 жыл бұрын

Yes so excited for Webb.

@robbyirwin4846

2 жыл бұрын

I'm so excited! It's going to change everything!!

@gregggreene5041

2 жыл бұрын

yes.

@gregggreene5041

2 жыл бұрын

🥴💥👊😁

0:50 you can't tell me that's not South Park's Al Gore voice. I'm super cereal.

The suspenseful build up leading to the lispy speech impediment was perfect. Had me rolling.

TIME is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an entire city complain about the same TIME paradox unless it was effected by it. Maybe a TIME distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of TIME distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're randomly given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? There is SO MUCH MORE to TIME than we realize. TI-I-I-IME, is on my side. Yes, it is!

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

Space, matter, and time don't just come along on their own. Try thinking. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

"Let there be light" always had a nice ring to it.

@thewaytruthandlife

2 жыл бұрын

amen Bro....

@mikeekim242

2 жыл бұрын

But not a lick of truth to it.

@scubastevedan

2 жыл бұрын

But a lot of Faith

@mikeekim242

2 жыл бұрын

@@scubastevedan There's no more a dishonest stance than faith.

@thewaytruthandlife

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikeekim242 more than you want it to have...

Excellent! There we go.

The best explanation so far is the Mathematical Universe, as put forward by Max Tegmark.

@LightshamanaDhyana

2 жыл бұрын

Rather informational than mathematical. I think.

@Kardashev1

2 жыл бұрын

@@LightshamanaDhyana They're kind of the same thing really. There is an entire math field of information theory.

@ozymandiasnullifidian5590

2 жыл бұрын

The best explanation we have so far is the standard model. There are many hypotheses and hypothetical frameworks, but they should be tested.

@mikehernandez7462

2 жыл бұрын

The Big bang theory reinforces my Christian belief in a supreme god that created the universe. After all somebody had to create the gases and molecules that formed the big bang that form the universe

@MakeMeMiko

Жыл бұрын

@@mikehernandez7462 "After all somebody had to create the gases and molecules that formed the big bang that form the universe". That's like saying "because we don't understand how it began it must've been God." Couldn't be more ignorant. If were just going to give up early here and say God did it, whats the point? May as well still live in caves according to you and just blame anything we can't understand on the invisible man.

I live in Dublin, Ireland. I live in the city and have never seen a star in our sky. Our city lights make it impossible even with binoculars. It drives me insane what I miss out on. 👽✌️

@danieljaygrossett-author

Жыл бұрын

Take a trip to Wales, I saw thousands and 5 shooting stars in 1 night alone

@AbbStar1989

Жыл бұрын

You need to take some time out and take a trip to your countryside. I live in a small town in Australia and looking up into the Milky Way and reflecting upon how far you are looking back in time... Damn dude/dudette. Put it on your bucket list. It's an emotion you want to experience as it is truly amazing.

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

Stars that got there, how? Do you think this just came into being on its own? The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

Let's of inspirational knowledges i have got today.

The steady state universe was once thought to be the theory of cosmology. Not anymore. Ever since Hubble, we've discovered the universe is expanding. In fact, one of the problems of the steady state universe is that it renders the universe unstable as if it were balancing on the head of a pin. It can't last forever in that precarious state. The same is true for the pre-big bang state of the universe. The idea of "nothing" is impossible - it's unstable. As a consequence, virtual particles are inevitable and some of them can be inflated so large, the size of the milky way galaxy in a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a second. Currently, the universe is thought to be at least 92 billion light-years in diameter. That's just insane because just ONE light-year is roughly equivalent to 6 Trillion miles.

@jettmthebluedragon

2 жыл бұрын

I agree in some ways after all how can a universe die into nothing if we don’t even understand it’s Origin 😐and also even if we are the only planet to have complex life many people are saying we will NEVER live ever again but look deeper the more you wonder after I was born in 1999 a very specific point within the earths history so the question is ware was I before 1999 I could have Ben anyone else but I’m not 😐could it be that when you die you are still conscious at a subatomic level and until you evolve or be born within that specific point in earths history? Seems possible but if that were the case would you remember your past ? No you would not because the brain can only remember so far back 😐and the longer you die your prefrontal cortex shuts down making you forget until the only thing you have to remember is your self 😐that’s why death is peaceful is Because you don’t feel anything and when you are being born you might feel changes so maybe we could be living a reset of our lives 😐 that sound like a fate worse then death 😓any saying that should I suffer forever? 😐well based on your experiences you could be living the same life over and over 😑however to change that cycle you have to do something 😐no one really knows if this universe will end and we will never come back or if this is just a repeat of our life’s 😐? After all you were evolved on earth their for you die with it 😑 and what that could mean is if another earth were to for again depending on the circumstances you will be put in the same place 😐 some people would say this is impossible but the question I would have how can you be sure? 😐think about why you were born your consciousness think about your experiences saying the universe will die and we will never exist may be possible however we don’t really know how the universe really works we don’t know for sure if the universe will truley end last forever or restart 😐but the more you look deeper the more you wonder😐if a universe were to truly end then how can you explain my every existence? You could say their was a Big Bang and saying is formed from nothing but you can’t just have a Big Bang formed from nothing 😑if the Big Bang is true you need mechanisms that created it in the first place 😐people are saying the Big Bang formed from nothing other say it was formed from a infinite mass others say the Big Bang may not happened at all 😐 if you say the bing bang formed the universe it it will forever end it’s possable but invalid 😑

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

The only thing unstable is your brain that thinks this all came about naturally. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

Perhaps life forms on distant galaxies are just now seeing earth from billions of years ago thinking that we are just another lifeless emerging planet!?

@Brammy007a

2 жыл бұрын

Very possible...... or if they are more than 4.6 billion light years away, they wouldn't even see our solar system at all.

@tedtedstone1231

2 жыл бұрын

Somewhere an alien scientist said, "No life there, too much liquid water and free oxygen"

@nothing9220

2 жыл бұрын

They would know they are observing the past.... Just like us

@Brammy007a

2 жыл бұрын

@@nothing9220 Yup, exactly..... and if they are 4.6 billion light years away they would (at most) be seeing the very early formation of the Sun.

@donaldduck7628

Жыл бұрын

Earth is way too small to be seen at that distance. Not even the sun could be resolved.

Great work...enjoyed it throughy

Good video🎥👍 🔥🐲

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

It was a clueless video for clueless people. God created all matter, not the silly big bang. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

At the point of conception there is a flash of light… Ponder on that thought….!

interesting ...

My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." Think of it like Alvin and the chipmunks. "Vyger's" message is fine. It's just sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or "Terran Time." It would be faster still if "Vyger" sent a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. (That name is still up for grabs.) Outside the Local Group time bubble, so on and so on until we get to the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." Now that "Vyger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's time bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's time bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until Vyger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference. •Local Group's time bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference. •Outside any influence in the, "True Interstellar Time Standard," or...;-P Name NOT up for grabs BUT just begging to be measured. The rate/flow of time is fastest here so, surfing time here is choice. Though it's best to have your motor boat. ;-P A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. Pass it on, please and thank you.

Beautifully written and narrated. Thank you. So the cosmic microwave background radiation is red-shifted to the microwave region? What color would it be at its source? visible?

@megamillionfreak

2 жыл бұрын

The photon decoupling 380,000 years after the Big Bang would have been 4000K white, and white light is the combination of all wavelengths so the color of the Universe at the source point would have been - all colors at the same time.

@jimgraham6722

2 жыл бұрын

At the end of inflation, a second or so after the big bang, photons would have been highly energetic with extremely short wavelengths, essentially very energetic gamma rays, far beyond ultra violet and X-rays on the electromagnetic spectrum.

Cool

This is why finding life may not be possible. And it could be teaming with life out there.

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

There's not much life in the brains that think this universe came about on its own. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

Ivan makes it so interresting. Very good narrator !

That was his utterly pure conscious peace of mind.

@Brammy007a

2 жыл бұрын

whose utterly pure conscious peace of mind?

@bipinshahi9830

2 жыл бұрын

@@Brammy007a Mine!

@bipinshahi9830

2 жыл бұрын

@@Brammy007a None senses HumanRace!

I been saying that since 2001, everything in the universe EVERYTHING has an opposing force, a balancing act, you have a positively charged proton there is a negatively charged electron, up must have down , there is male must have female, gravity must have dark energy, it seems to me that the universe it's an equation that is always eternally trying to balance itself. There must be an opposing force for a black hole, the theorized white hole, but never have we ever (not will we I think) see a point in space-time where matter seems to be just launching matter into our universe willy nilly. That is because we you said I think we must be riding that "white hole" to me that makes perfect sense and I can grasp and understand that concept at least I think I can anyways 😅

@chkmaclean1

2 жыл бұрын

What i dont get is the world and everything in it is 3d or 4d or whatever. How can the universe be flat in you can move 360 decrees in any direction. How can a black hole make a wormhole if a black hole is round? If its round then how can you get out it?. You'd see the way out from some angle

@fred_2021

Жыл бұрын

@@chkmaclean1 The word 'flat' is misleading. It doesn't really mean that there's no 'up and down'. It's still 3D space. It means only that the geometry of spacetime on the cosmic scale appears to be the good ol' (Euclidean) geometry we learn at school, like triangles with 180 degrees when you draw them on a flat surface. A triangle on a curved surface, like a football, or the Earth, has more than the 180 degrees. Weird things happen to spacetime geometry due to gravitation though, so it's not uniformly flat. It gets bent, dragged, and twisted, like some kind on malleable substance. This affects not just the space aspect, but the time aspect also.

@dmitryshusterman9494

Жыл бұрын

I suggest you learn grammar first, before attempting deeper thoughts on universe. Simply, your words reflect your thoughts, and apparently, it's a mess.

No one will able know how actually our universe were born unless humanity could build time travel machines

Boom 🤯

"A telescope is a time machine."

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

No, it's a tool to magnify. This was all created about the same time in a matter of days. It couldn't happen without God. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

Pluto has moons, that makes it a plannit to me

I go for the repeating cycle theory myself.

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

Can you explain how it even started? The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

@harrietharlow9929

Жыл бұрын

@@2fast2block I never said that it didn't start supernaturallly.

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

@@harrietharlow9929 I never said you didn't. AGAIN, here's what I said, and this time try reading it... YOU put..."I go for the repeating cycle theory myself." Can you explain how it even started? The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

From where and why the matter for big bang came up together just before explosion? Is there any theory explaining before big bang?

@georgebushdoesntcareaboutb3890

2 жыл бұрын

There was no explosion for one thing. It was an expansion and there are theories for what caused it and what came before if anything. Those theories aren't talked about in a serious light because there's no way to observe, study, or test any such thing. It's the equivalent of talking about religion and gods. I like the subject though. It's really makes it clear that nothing is likely the way you would think it should be. Regardless of your thoughts on the situation. How can anything exist forever with no beginning? How can there be no space-time and then the with out reason it creates itself? If something else created it, what created that creator? It's all whacked out and will never have any really importance in our short lives. But it's interesting as hell. I'll haunt you after I take myself out if there's an afterlife. Don't worry though, there's not. We will dissappear and become non existent forever. It'll be like before we were born. Sounds fun I guess, but extremely pointless and without meaning or significance.

Hey..thnx to you Keith Baker i can't finish watching this ...laughing too hard...

All i know is Gravity Over Dynamics keeps it appearing how it does.

Finding the center of the Univers is like being in a dark room in space not moving, , then open up the door and seeing all the stars, and try to find the center.

@matttirado7661

2 жыл бұрын

Centers of universes don't exist because they have no point of origin. Therefore, wherever you are is theoretically the center of the universe

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

@@matttirado7661 Hubble hated a center because he hated God that created all this. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

Here's something for you to think about. Science tells us that everything is moving away from each other and eventually there will be nothing but voidspace because everything will be so far away from each other. So how do you explain the Andromeda galaxy in the Milky Way galaxy headed toward each other? Seriously think about it. How are these two galaxies headed toward each other from opposite directions?

So where did the big bang come from??

@gumpyoldbugger6944

2 жыл бұрын

that is what we are investigating......it's been less than 100 years since Fr. Georges Lemaître first noted the continuing expansion of the Universe in 1927 and confirmed by Hubble two years later, and it's only been some 50 or 60 years since we have been able to put satellites into orbit to study it properly.....so give them a bit of time eh? One day they just might be able to answer your question. And no, it wasn't GAWD.

"If you really want to know then this is it and you heard from me." Our Universe is just the otherside of a another very big blackhole from a parallel universe. The way the universe expands is because we are the exhaust from the blackhole and the momentum of the material getting sucked into the blackhole from a parallel universe and then pushed out the otherside of the blackhole gave all the matter the momentum to keep expanding, This is why they can see back in time expanding from a single point. After all the matter Was released from the back end of the blackhole the blackhole collapsed on itself and sealed off. This is also happening now in our universe with stuff sucked through blackholes in our universe into other parallel universes as well. This is a continue process of universe building and destruction just like plate tectonics on earth..

@seanpoulk5718

2 жыл бұрын

That is more plausable than all matter in the universe was condensed down to a tiny point and then for some unknow reason it instantly expanded with a "big bang" The big bang theory is just that, a theory. When sceintists have no explanation they utilize a PFA (pull from arse) technique and come up with an explanation and then keep repeating it until it becomes the accepted explanation. They should say we have no idea how the universe was created but here are the differing theories. The big bang theory is so implausable that it just makes those that perpetuate it look foolish. So in your thoery our universe is just a cosmic shart. David you may just be right.

@Paine137

2 жыл бұрын

@@seanpoulk5718 There is evidence of expansion, from the CMB to redshifted galactic light: so rewind time and everything gets closer together. Not sure why you're whining, nor do you understand what a "theory" actually is. You're criticizing a "hypothesis", which is a claim without the necessary evidence. The Big Bang "theory", much like evolution, or gravity, actually has evidence in support of the model.

@SPCoyote1

2 жыл бұрын

Yooo i had this same thought

@Lucarinho

2 жыл бұрын

@@seanpoulk5718 well, in science a theory is actually supported by evidence obtained from the real world. The word you are looking for is "hypothesis". The big bang is no hypothesis, it's a theory backed up by hard data evidence.

@seanpoulk5718

2 жыл бұрын

@@Lucarinho "hard data, evidence" ?????? seeing that objects in the universe are traveling apart, even though we have no idea of the size, shape or limits of the universe, if any. The big bang "theory" is then presented on the basis, "if the objects in the universe are traveling away from each other then there must be a center point that they came from. That center point must have had all the matter in the universe in one small area and it, for no specific known reason got super hot and exploded. Viola the Universe as seen by simpletons. So you see, we all are just black hole excrement. My theory has just as much validity as the big shabangaroonie.......bazinga nerd.

Enjoyable "Cosmic".... "History"= all in "HUMAN",....NUT-CHILL= "UNIVERSE" !!

@jasonhollister7497

Жыл бұрын

Technology is "EXPANDING" along with this "UNIVERSE" !!

@jasonhollister7497

Жыл бұрын

Impressive NUT-CHILL & this "Universe"....!!

That was sorcery gass thats why his peace of mind decided to create stars and suns by creating them pure sources of light.

Actually, it used to be called The Big Bong. But on account of a typing error in the 1930s we are now stuck with the Bang.

The moment a particle is a wave; it has to be a conscious wave! Gravity is the conscious attraction among wave to create the illusion of particles, and our experience-able Universe. Max Planck states "Consciousness is fundamental and matter is derived from Consciousness". Life is the Infinite Consciousness, experiencing the Infinite Possibilities, Infinitely. We are "It", experiencing our infinite possibilities in our finite moment. Our job is to make it interesting!

Bind Moggling. That, we can be insured of. Bigger than huge comes to mind. Moggles the Bind.

Light isn't the fastest thing we know in nature. Space/time is as it is expanding faster than the speed of light. Dark energy particles causing that expansion are likely to be faster than light particles.

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

They started their silly big bang and it led to absurdity. Dark energy they just made up to their faster than light expansion. Then saying the big bang created all matter just adds to how clueless the love to be. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

How do we know that that is the edge of the universe? If doppler shift has a limit, we are just seeing the limit of doppler shift.

@Paine137

2 жыл бұрын

Hence the "observable" Universe versus the larger spacetime in which our Cosmos may be embedded. It's likely there's more to reality than what we can see, but astronomy and physics allow us to approach that boundary.

Please Explain James Web has found galaxies much older than the origin of the "BIG BANG" ???

Sound created the universe

Face to Face with Eternity

Another problem with the thinking of human is that as soon as it figured something out it thinks that it applies to all things at the same time instead of things having it's own moment so it thinks a million light years away is the already happing to its own happening now There is no such thing as the universe ever being one verse

WMAP was supposed to let us know if the universe was a sphere, a saddle shape, a donut shape, etc. Instead it was inconclusive and they ended up with the same results as before. A flat universe. Whatever that's supposed to mean. ... So everyone shut up about it, and moved on. But I remember this, because there were allot of articles at the time, on WMAP being built for that answer. I was reading that before the even built WMAP!

AND IF ITS NOT THE BIG BANG BUT A SMALL BANG

Is Gary Shandling narrating this??

I think I have a plausible idea

To get this image, they had to subtract the motion of the satellite around the Earth, the motion of the Earth around the sun and the sun's motion around the galaxy - and probably the overall motion of the galaxy itself, right? And if the microwave background is uniform in all directions, why can't we use it as a reference to establish the earth's motion against this constant?

@Kardashev1

2 жыл бұрын

When we see the CMB it's as it was 300,000 years after the big bang.

@drtrimbach

2 жыл бұрын

Photons travel at the speed of light, in all frames of references

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

This video is clueless and so are those that take it seriously. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

so if a galaxy is 4 million light years away , say i could live for ever, if that galaxy suddenly died , do i see the galaxy's light gradually fade or does one day it dissapear?

I believe somebody had to strike the match.

Sounds like there saying Give me one miracle, and I'll explain the rest with science.

@LetsConquerTheUniverseTogether

2 жыл бұрын

Gaps in human understanding are anything but miraculous.

@Dirshaun

2 жыл бұрын

@@LetsConquerTheUniverseTogether It's as fanciful as any mythology, and just as blindly followed.

@LetsConquerTheUniverseTogether

2 жыл бұрын

@@Dirshaun Let me know when people start congregating to churches in reverence of a deity erected from the field of cosmology. Science is not indicative of mythology, and any attempt to claim otherwise would be entirely intellectually dishonest.

@Dirshaun

2 жыл бұрын

@@LetsConquerTheUniverseTogether Ever look into scientology? Hubbard's Dianetics: The Evolution of a Science. Also described as a cult, business and a religious movement. You don't need a god or gods to have a mythology based on what ever you want. Religious cosmology is an explanation of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe from a religious perspective. I think you must have forgotten that your dealing with humans who get up to all kinds of weird stuff. There's also the 1. Church of Reality, 2. The Circle of Reason and 3. The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (Not making that up). The thing I find most disturbing about modern science is that if you go against the narrative or group think, your attacked and ridiculed. This is how you know your dealing with a cult. When people would rather continue a lie, then except their wrong. I personally don't deny science. I fully accept the useful parts of it. I can just fit it, and a personal belief in my life.

@LetsConquerTheUniverseTogether

2 жыл бұрын

​@@Dirshaun Special pleading, huh? Your emotional desire to equate things to that which they don't belong is just that; your emotional desire. "The thing I find most disturbing about modern science is that if you go against the narrative or group think, your attacked and ridiculed." That's the kind of rhetoric commonly touted in Flat Earth or Creationism videos, too. Congratulations, I guess.

So we have no idea what the andromeda galaxy looks like now. Does it still even exist?

The speed of light is only incredibly fast on a human and earth like scale. Compared to the size of the universe it is remarkably slow. Always wondered about that - why is it so slow?

@mikedar8484

2 жыл бұрын

Because it is also a particle?

@orlovsskibet

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikedar8484 how does that answer the question?

@mikedar8484

2 жыл бұрын

@@orlovsskibet A particles mass restricts speed.. but a electromagnetic is also restricted.. but less so. A Photon switches back and forth from particle to wave so light will never be as fast, as say, gravity.. which has never had a speed assigned because 'electro' wave is the best we have to measure speed and gravity is faster than light. The reason everyone got excited about matched 'entanglement'.. a first concept faster than light.

@orlovsskibet

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikedar8484 I know there are restrictions on speed. I still don't understand that the restricted max speed is as low as it is, compared to the size of the universe. That's all.

@mikedar8484

2 жыл бұрын

@@orlovsskibet How can you know the restriction and ask the question? It is, what it is. If you wish something in a prospective then ask FOR THAT. Like, you want illumination in another visible manner? Do you wish for communication to be faster... what is it you want that keeps you from truly understanding the very nature isn't a thing based on wants. Humans developed ability to see with visible frequency in photons, it has limits, if you don't like it find another manner for perception so to not be concerned with Light. What does size of universe have to do with anything about light.. two different things.

If we cant look into the past(direction) , which direction is the future????

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

The future for these silly big bang believers creating is just leading to their doom. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

You're asking the wrong question. Was there something that stopped the big bang from starting? The big bang is still happening as the universe is still expanding and the expansion is accelerating. Everything you see is part of a huge explosion that is still exploding.

@jimgraham6722

2 жыл бұрын

Yes continuous inflation seems a very plausible explanation. What we experience is a localised area where a quantum fluctuation caused matter and the Higgs field to emerge, slowing things down. As these localised effects weaken, expansion of space is accelerating once more, to catch up with the rest of the bulk, something that is being played out over trillions of years. A possible variation on the theme is Penrose's conformal cyclic cosmology that has similar stretches of the imagination.

@susmarcon

2 жыл бұрын

The "big bang" is a manifestation spawned from scripture, and reflects the philosophical dead end confronting unsophisticated ancient logicians, who were driven to write or at least legitimise the religious phrase "let there be light". The Universe is of unknown origin and extent.( Electric Universe)

@ozymandiasnullifidian5590

2 жыл бұрын

An explosion is a rather wrong word, but we don't have any suitable word for something that happened at the start of spreading the spacetime. Maybe expansion which is still happening. But, at one moment as far as I know that stopped or almost stopped. It accelerated in the last 4 billion years.

@kayakMike1000

2 жыл бұрын

@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 The expansion is still accelerating as if there is something pushing stuff away faster. More distant, more red shift.

@ozymandiasnullifidian5590

2 жыл бұрын

@@kayakMike1000 The expansion is accelerating, that is, the space is making more space, so to say... The reason is that dark energy, a mysterious force that is forcing space to make more space... Yes, the redshift is enormous to the objects that are more distant, it looks like those objects are going away faster than the speed of light, but that is just an illusion, because space itself can spread faster than the speed of light, objects with mass in the space can't go faster than the speed of causality. It is like spreading a rubber...

Sorry but, Is Spark able to steal and repost content from Cosmic Vistas?

@claytonbyrd6134

2 жыл бұрын

Evidently? Lol

James webb space telescope has shown there was a galaxy 13 billion light years and beyond that there is sure more big bangs in outer space with infinite numbers

Before the universe what was there?

If you could see the end of your own life would you still be driven by the suspense of living it?

@maddyboombaddybaddy6532

2 жыл бұрын

Prolly not

@tedtedstone1231

2 жыл бұрын

I'm not now.

@tk6839

Жыл бұрын

What else?

How the big bang occurred? What was the state before Big Bang

Why are the cosmic background images oval? Should they be 3 dimensional? Where is Earth in relation to bid bang?

Cosmology's "God of the gaps" = Dark matter, Cosmic inflation, & Dark energy

look at how a human is born and may get some answers as we are part of the universe-everything is connected. for ex look at the branches of a tree and our lungs -looks similar - the river systems of the earth how they resemble our blood flow threw our veins

Welcome to the big bang , it went boom and created everything. Thanks for listening

Oh ! Nd my house just contructed itself...lol

We always talk about how, but why. Why did the first big bang happen. What caused it to happen.

Yes I am🙂🙃👨‍🎓

Ok so my question 🤔 Where did the Energy for this Bang came and how is all the planets and stars and Galaxies are put together so perfect ?? Even our own Galaxy has billions of stars how is that possible 😬😳🧐 how many big bangs did we have

@Trivanthe1992

2 жыл бұрын

.

@Trivanthe1992

2 жыл бұрын

.

@ayushsharma8804

2 жыл бұрын

1 big bang produced all that energy as far as we know. It is weird to claim the universe is perfect, perfect for what? It is no more perfect than a vortex, it simply is and at some time it will simply cease to be.

@bloodymirgoku

2 жыл бұрын

@Ayush Sharma it is perfect otherwise we would be dead Where did the spark come from ? Where did the matter come from ? Why Stars different sizes ? Why is there Biliiions upon billions of stars ? There must be a Creator No other way unless you're delusional

@daughterofzion1083

Жыл бұрын

there was no big bang since nothing cannot produce something

How did the bigbang overcome its own event horizon.

My brain hurts!!!

Yo we all up here just beating our sausages, everyone here beating sausage.

One day all galaxies or the whole universe will turn into one body when end comes true.

@kenrickbenjamin1608

2 жыл бұрын

We don't have to wait for the end, that's why it's called Universe.

@nopretribrapture2318

2 жыл бұрын

Hence every element burned up with a fervent heat (2 Peter 3:10)

@kenrickbenjamin1608

2 жыл бұрын

@@nopretribrapture2318 At that time elements had not been produced yet. Elements were created later.

@kenrickbenjamin1608

2 жыл бұрын

@@nopretribrapture2318 hence I am talking beginning.

@bryanwood7771

2 жыл бұрын

Actually aren't galaxies..for the most part.. moving farther from each other?

So where is the centre of the universe? There must be a point that remains stationary and if there is nothing faster than light then how did the universe expand instantly in a trillionth of a second that would make light freeze?

@tedtedstone1231

2 жыл бұрын

"Center" in Time-Space necessarily includes both the time and space components. The "center" of the Universe is likely in our "past" or "future".

Wow some information mixed in with commercials 👌🏻

@StanHowse

2 жыл бұрын

Get yourself an adblocker son.

And God said..." let there be light". Simple enough.

IT DOES NOT STOP , INFINITY

@2fast2block

Жыл бұрын

This had a beginning by God, not some silly big bang. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.

This makes m think, there is a high probability of life in other galaxy, living being, need not be anything like what we saw and need not be any smart..

the math says there should have been the same amount of anti matter as there was matter; at the beginning. Seems something helped us along. I love the idea there is god out there.

@urusledge

2 жыл бұрын

There was a big think vid on the cosmic web reflecting/being God's mind or something like that.

@BigNewGames

2 жыл бұрын

Energy converts into elementary particles experiments proved that. So if matter and anti-matter were in equal portions in the beginning not all the anti-matter and matter would have collided. The blunt of the energy would have eventually converted into normal matter, explaining why there is so much matter and not anti-matter after nearly 14 billion years.

@urusledge

2 жыл бұрын

@@BigNewGames how does energy converting to particles prevent the matter and antimatter from colliding? And can't energy also convert into elementary antiparticles?

@BigNewGames

2 жыл бұрын

@@urusledge When particles emerge they do so in pairs, one positive proton and a negative electron. Rarely do anti-matter particles emerge. It does happen, a negative proton and a positive electron but not very often. Research pair production theory. Thus it might explain why anti-matter and normal matter was not produced in equal amounts during the beginning of the universe. That was a postulate when anti-matter particles were discovered.

@69NOMAN69

2 жыл бұрын

@@BigNewGames when the bb happened there was no space so the anti matter and matter would have collided with no space between the two.

The problem with an only physics explanation of physical reality is that it does not include an important aspect of the picture: Biology. The universe is “alive". [If you doubt that, I would ask, are you alive? You are universe.] How is that explained by physics and what significance do they give to that in trying to explain what they see? If our universe is living, it was born. If it was born, it has parents which it resembles. Thus, using biology, on the premise that the universe is living, we can surmise that our universe is a function of the interaction between other pre-existing universes like our own, and from whom we got our "laws, mass, and including our life, intelligence, creativity, and consciousness, all of which are only associated with living things. At that point, our living universe would exist in a common time and space with those other universes (or what's left of them), and including a myriad of other related "living universes" like stars in a night sky. Essentially that is the realm beyond the boundary of our expanding universe. When we can see that far, they will appear much more that 14 billion light years away. Our universe would be effected gravitationally by those large bodies of mass, like the other galaxies that effect our Milky Way, so that would offer another explanation for the gravity that we measure holding our universe together that we currently theorize is associated with a super high density dark matter...…..

@prestonbacchus4204

Жыл бұрын

@Kraig StClair If the James Webb were to discover bodies of mass more than 14 billion light years away, then that would indicate that those bodies of mass did not come out of our big bang, and, as I said, those would be large bodies of mass existing in relation to our own universe, and affecting our universe gravitationally.

@prestonbacchus4204

Жыл бұрын

@Kraig StClair Aren't you living? When you claim you are alive, specifically WHAT do you claim is alive? Just like the universe you are merely made out of atoms. Do you claim the atoms of your body are alive? Obviously the universe is "alive" because you are alive and you literally are universe, not something else. As for what I said about the James Webb, if they found large bodies of mass more than 14 billion light years away, that would strongly suggest (unless you would like to abandon speed of light restrictions) that those bodies of mass could not have come out of our big bang. They would be, therefore, "large bodies of mass" existing in relation to our own universe, as I suggested. [With "our universe" being defined as "the material that emerged out of our big bang"]. At that point, the model would be similar to the way galaxies in our universe relate to each other. In that regard, our Milky Way galaxy was formed as a function of the interaction of other pre-existing galaxies from which our's was made. If that same model were applicable to the bundle of galaxies we call "our universe", then the physical appearance of our universe would be a function of the interaction of other pre-existing universes that would have originally appeared out of their own big bang event. Again, if the model is like galaxies, our universe exists in common time and space with myriads of other universes like our own that would be effecting our universe gravitationally and via electromagnetism.

My aversion to the nasal twang of the narrator's speech outweighs my desire to see the content of this video. I acknowledge this to be a flaw on my part, nevertheless I can't bear to hear it past about 5 min.

We are a tiny etsy, wtsy little piece of insignificant piece of grain of sand and we think we know how the universe was born and works?

Doesn’t mention what caused the big bank.

If a theory requires presumptions to bridge gaps, it's incomplete. And presuming to be definitive isn't part of the scientific method.

What made that 'bang'🤣?

No scientist will ever solve how the universe was formed. Where did the sand , rocks , water and other elements come from. How did all these necessary elements to start the process the universe come from. Maybe the answer lies when we die.

Imagine if would somehow witness the end of time with the Hubble. Of course it would billions of years in the future, but that would be something.

I DONT UNDERSTAND......ANSWERS PLEASE VERY DEEP

Say you stumble across a Rolex in the desert. Do you think to yourself, “I wonder what natural laws and processes formed this Rolex?” I think we all know that’s silly. So why do it for the universe?

@xXblinnyboyXx

Жыл бұрын

@Kraig StClair Definitely not imaginary. The proof is all around. From archaeology, geography, fossil record, Bible prophecy, historic documents, morals, etc. It takes more faith to believe we exist by chance than created by God. Do better research before coming to conclusions.

So does it end with the big freeze, a crunch or a rip? Or like split atoms, do we simply expand until our Universe breaks in two, and then both halves continue to expand and break into two and so on...a multiplying Universe scenario? I would love to know the answers, but doubt my humble human mind could comprehend or cope with the truth.

@lilmike2710

2 жыл бұрын

The PLONK or whatever didn't answer any questions. Not a single one. In reality it created more questions than it answered. Lot's of nerds daydreaming though. I have high hopes for the Webb telescope though.

@tedtedstone1231

2 жыл бұрын

I think of our Universe like a fracture in a greater whole, the crack expands, but you can never leave the interior or observe beyond it.

@JBMorris9

2 жыл бұрын

Scientists believe everything will end in some billion years. All the stars and planets will die.

@Scott-eo7lj

2 жыл бұрын

No one knows these answers. You're simply asking this guy his OPINION. Hope you're satisfied with someone's opinion. Lol

@Scott-eo7lj

2 жыл бұрын

@@JBMorris9 not billions... hundreds of billions. Luckily you me and everything we know will long be gone before the end comes.

What is the "plunk" mission?

@tahirsaleh4114

2 жыл бұрын

To look back in time -, and answer questions that concern the human species.

We need a new theory about the universe, Just imagin that all of space is full of energy and gravity that changes state.

@Paine137

2 жыл бұрын

Quick, call NASA.

As the earth rotates on it's orbits at the speed of light , everything seems to be moving away, Turn on your TV and see the radiation to your antena

You see gravaty as o focus poind🤣😍😅😅😅 If I pull on watter I pull it up and below pulled it down😍 If I whayght for the pull below to rise I release slowley towart the watter the watter will pulled itself op😍

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

He where are the other sharing bevore😅😅😅 Don't you wish to understand Einstein was have right you know. But you nevver realized that magnetic and graventational space and motion dragged less negative space allong😍 To become a less negative space bocked for its schinking particles inside towart gravaton evend of inpanding space dime tions😍 Fotlr the thentional diverentional displasmends to occure😍🛸😍 Than we see static gravity and informed gravety to bring diverentional for the particles to tace position as a sphericle shaped entety😍

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

Graventaitional lencing is actualy magneticle lencing😍🙏😍

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

Becous if the star has less exeleration you don't see the ring bending space around it. When I look to the hole I make with mi vingertips😍 I see biking the hole. And at the fingers I see light atrect itself towart the finger do to the less negative space and the countering of directional feildflow of the space around mi fingers do to mi own directional feildflow of the multy dimentional existance of mi fingers But this is not the same as the stars 😍😍😍 The stars hold on less negative space around it onley in more volume to be equal and as thention sourge towart the everighe thention of the aproged dimention😍 This means it is pulled from for it to give to and wat is dragged to go as a counterfeildflow towart us to see that match further😍 magneticle lancing on gravetational demend😍

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

Of the posurver and opsurved on that intermedieum as the emotion of that star and parend of that star😍

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

We furst create the beld to contain its sun not the other way around😍 Noting is the senter ot of the totalety but oll togheter are the conditions of the senters behavieure towart part of the coherence of its own totalety on demand of the total totalety😍🛸😍

If the univers of space is infinite than the number of universes is also infinite.

@watchgeek3977

Жыл бұрын

Not always, its equivalent to a Lamda function of a smelly fart.

But heyyyyy, that's just a theory. A SPACE theory.

@Lucarinho

2 жыл бұрын

Well, in science a theory is actually supported by evidence. What you're looking for is "hypothesis". And no, the BB is not a hypothesis, just like gravity it's a theory supported by real life evidence.

@VibrationsfromMirror

Жыл бұрын

Theory to us, yet what's up with ships like trb's around the sun?

The universe exploded into existence like a thought.

no beginning: all was and is…

I did that