GPT = Generative Pre-Trained Transformer

@pooplucky3793

25 күн бұрын

Yup

“If you haven’t stayed up 3 nights anxious about it, you probably haven’t experienced AI”… proceeds to brush off the machine god scenario. Dude! That’s what I’m anxious about!

@oli9220

6 күн бұрын

At least it's true to the channel name. They have a big thinker there - a big one.

"When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it and you argue about what to do about it only after you have had your technical success." ~Oppenheimer

@capefear56

Ай бұрын

Just like antifreeze

you didn't explain the point you mentioned in your title. I clicked expecting to hear why the machine god isn't the AI scenario I needed to worry about but got nothing in that direction. oh we get distracted by the extreme option, lets focus on the others. Well that did not at all explain why I should not worry about the extreme option. Big think you are a decent channel, please don't engage in click bait.

@milodemoray

19 күн бұрын

He did. The answer is that we have agency, and AI does not.

@FireyDeath4

14 күн бұрын

@@milodemoray Are You Sure About That

@milodemoray

14 күн бұрын

@FireyDeath4 Whether we get annihilated by an asteroid, or nuclear war, it really does not matter. The universe itself is hostile to life, never mind a man made device which cannot even tie its own shoelaces.

Between AI and other world events, it definitely seems like we're reaching the endgame.

"One often meets his destiny on the road he takes to avoid it" -Master Oogway

@tristanotear3059

26 күн бұрын

Which is the plot of Oedipus Rex in its entirety.

"You need to know when the AI is likely to lie to you and when it's not going to" sounds very creepy to me as in the field I work in, people are encouraged to use AI to increase efficiency, but it could produce a lot of fake information and take our job away...

I'm not afraid of Hal from '2001: A Space Odyssey', I'm afraid of AM from 'I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream'

@controlcomputer.4392

27 күн бұрын

I think it would be very very difficult to unintentionally create an AI like that.

I don't get the optimism, especially in a late-term capitalist society. AI will be lead to where companies can make more money. Period. History and Sociology show us that abundantly.

@christoffer886

Ай бұрын

What scenario are you thinking of? If every job gets replaced? The problem with this thinking is that the economy relies on everyone participating. If everyone is out of a job, they can't pay for the products that the automated corporations produce. In the end, governments will be forced to introduce something like UBI, but they will be forced to go further as the entire dynamic of the world economy breaks. And then I ask, so what? We're both debating how workers today are working themselves to death, and at the same time we fight for people to have a job no matter what. It's an oxymoron. If we look at everything honestly, a world in which the primary goal in life isn't to get a job, but to spend time focusing on what you actually want to do is a much better life lived. We will never run out of jobs that feature people who are passionate about it because they like it, but today, most jobs are not that thing even if the workers are actively convincing themselves that they love what they do. The inability to sense a society beyond capitalism makes people both hate capitalism and fight for it, rather than figuring out a solution for people if we would ever reach a point in which automation removes most jobs that exist. But even so, just like in the movie "Her", when Theodore gets help from Samantha to do his job, she still needs Theodore as the "soul" of that job. It will be a long time before AI removes jobs all together. It's obvious that it's gonna be a tool to speed up a lot of tedious tasks and such innovation has already happened in our society before, but we've forgotten all jobs that got lost because of it since society moved on and no one wants to return to before those days again.

@SouthernMenace

Ай бұрын

@@christoffer886 this is the internal fight inherent to the "left vs right" dichotomy. One postulates that accumulating capital is the ultimate end goal, while the other believes that resources should be split equally. This is why capitalism as it is will inevitably lead to social imbalance and convulsions. We are already seeing the tail end of it, with a while generation basically unable to acquire a home unless they inherit it from their fathers or land a job at the top of this ever-narrowing pyramid. Once this happens, the Musks and Jansens of this world will feign surprise and will ponder "how could this ever happen", and I'm sure we will continue to blame strawmen instead of the real causes. And I'm pretty sure if you ask AI the causes, its inbuilt boss will reflect those positions. The tragedy is that AI is essential for our collective advance. It works wonders for some fields of knowledge where data crunching is crucial, such as astronomy and medicine. But this no-end-goal form of capitalism currently in place will inevitably drive us to social unrest, unless we have a better collectivist approach, instead of increasing the wage gap. Maybe universal income could be a solution, but do you think this is a viable political solution nowadays?

@gaylebeats

29 күн бұрын

Lets remember, AI is never going to be a consumer of goods and services humans will always be.....

@goldenera1925

28 күн бұрын

​@@gaylebeats you don't need regular consumers to run an economy, business to business can do just fine on it's own

@findmeinthecarpet

26 күн бұрын

Sociology is a Marxist scam.

This vision is very optimistic and does not consider human ego and greed. It's actually going to be really bad. Make no mistake, be ready for a dystopian future.

@DriFitMonk

24 күн бұрын

No meed to prepare for what is already here

@sandervdw1784

23 күн бұрын

I’m pretty sure with a society dominated by social media, we already live that future.

@nilo_river

23 күн бұрын

@@DriFitMonk It's getting worse every day. Imagine what we have today but worse raised to power 1000 in the near future.

@nilo_river

23 күн бұрын

@@sandervdw1784 Yes, but things tend to get more and more Black Mirrorish

@j2csharp

16 күн бұрын

Somewhat optimistic, yes. That's my hope for AI, but yes, there will be bad actors. Here's hoping we balance to the good side. Situational awareness is key.

This is a very optimistic view. If you consider the quintessential flaw of humans coupled with the exponential growth of AI, then, you should be very worried. We WILL use it wrong and it WILL backfire. It’s in our nature, we can’t help ourselves. Stems from our curiosity. It’s that “How far can we push this thing and can it REALLY do what we think it could do?”

@patrickmohr6985

Ай бұрын

Still depends on the application. We’ve already pushed it to moral gray areas. But I think using it for things that would be more commonly deemed morally wrong instead of just questionable will be few and far between.

@themaestrodamus

Ай бұрын

@@patrickmohr6985 it may be few and far between but it’ll be the most profound and impactful

@genedalefield

Ай бұрын

Yeah, having something that can do all the engineering of any already known vectors of danger, that even our so called representatives don't work to contain (though perhaps they keep success on that front secret) is a massive danger. I don't even believe then that they're capable of containment. There's so much that's already immoral and illegal that gets done, and the levels of surveillance and control needed to be effective against the dangers that could be created, we have demonstrated that we don't accept those methods. Being in the middle between morality and immorality, freedom and control, we end up with danger and addressing that danger is dangerous in itself. Of course you need balance, but instead of stability we're left with volatility.

@highcue

Ай бұрын

you clearly watch too much nexflix

@rw6836

Ай бұрын

Reminds me of the moment in the movie "Oppenheimer" in which humans decided to test nuclear bomb anyway, when there was a non-zero chance that the nuclear reaction could become a runaway reaction and fry the Earth. I agree, human nature seems to want to "test things out", even though it might lead to our own demise. The rationale for testing nuclear bomb was, if we don't do it, our enemies would anyway, so we need to do it. The same thing is happening with AGI.

I argue that we need AI to take our jobs away. Once menial tasks and basic labor and production jobs are no longer necessary it frees us up to do the things that make us human. We would all become artists, musicians, athletes, artisans, philosophers, scientists, creators and explorers. The transition will be uncomfortable but society will reform itself around valuing humans for their human qualities and economies will follow suit.

@andreabertazzoli7695

Ай бұрын

This would work only in a socialist society where the means of production are shared.

@bsmithhammer

Ай бұрын

Thanks for my first good laugh of the morning. I hope to visit your planet some day.

@gordongekko2781

Ай бұрын

Except that this has never been the case in the history of the world. Every time we make a new technological advancement (discovery of: fire, agriculture, electricity, industrial revolution, computers, etc.) we harness that power to increase productivity, then we re-purpose the labor force to do other tasks. We never choose freedom and recreation. We always choose to increase the demands for output instead.

@Aihiospace

Ай бұрын

@@andreabertazzoli7695 Not a "socialist" society but a normal - healthy, intelligent and sustainable - society (i.e. the opposite of our current neoliberal wasteland).

@bsmithhammer

Ай бұрын

@@Aihiospace Can you point to an example of where that exists currently on the planet? Where people are 'free from having to work' and have created the kind of paradise you describe?

This sounds like someone speculating what life is all about before being born.

"We get to decide how this thing is used" Please define that 'we' because for damn sure it does not include in any way, shape or form, Me!

I generally liked this, but when the answer to a vitally important question is "don't think about it", that's suspicious. In politics, the people who tell you not to think are are not your friend. That's a huge red flag. I'm not sure what it means in this context.

"we get to decide how this thing is used" is not how I see how this is going to roll out. Large companies are deciding how they can use AI. They own it. They made it. Using our (biassed, entertainment, sometimes shallow) content from the internet. Companies like Meta + AI = I'm out.

@WorkingMan1177

3 күн бұрын

My thought is “for how long” do we “get to decide?” If we don’t really know how A.I. is going to evolve (or a particular AI) then how much control do we ultimately have? Does our level of control diminish after a certain amount of time? (A parent loosing control over their teenager type thing). We don’t know what we don’t know and that is potentially dangerous in context to “ever evolving AI.”

I love how this comments section is full of people who completely disagree with this video's stance. In this particular case, if you want to know what the people really think, it's in the comments section, not in the video.

Stanley Kubrick is teaching in Wharton.

The problem with AI isn't that people are worried about it for no reason, the problem is the majority of people are powerless in the realm of AI. Only a hand full of people world wide have real control or access to AI and those people are almost entirely money motivated, so how can you say we shouldn't be afraid or worried. In addition, statistical its been shown that around 90% of people dislike AI every time they encounter it and trust companies less when they use it. The real question should be if the vast majority of people don't like or trust AI why should we continue with it?

@bsmithhammer

Ай бұрын

Most people only have the vaguest idea of what "AI" actually is, and the term is being massively overused, and used inappropriately, by media on a daily basis. No one should be surprised that ignorance and lack of good information are a fertile breeding ground for fear.

@Smokedouttasian

Ай бұрын

you are aware there is open source AI like X AI (GROK), which is accessible to the masses. also where did you get this 90% from? can u link the study? If you are gonna state stuff might as well be factual about your statements

@TheTuubster

Ай бұрын

Nope. You can run it locally on your computer, if you have a mid-class gaming PC with a modern graphics card. The software is open source (like InvokeAI for image rendering or text-generation-webui for chatbots) and the databases are only a couple of Gigabytes. What you are saying here is a conspiracy-theory-lie.

@kome360

Ай бұрын

I think the obvious answer is for everyone to get a personal AI that they have full rights to indoctrinate to their views and effectively become our lifelong sidekicks. Having a faithful AI to counter any other hostile AI. The problem is that those in power would sooner murder their children than let us have this level of power and freedom.

@Smokedouttasian

29 күн бұрын

@@rangerCG As far as I see it people are basing their fears on movies and books especially main stream plots where AI decides to destroy it's masters. Also remember 2012 when people thought it was the end of the world because of unreliable info not based on the realities of the true world. When it comes to these situations it's best to use your head not your heart

I think this interview illustrates the flaw of constant optimism. Optimists are very positive people and they are good for morale. But, I've worked with optimists and their weakness is that they always have a blind spot for bad actors. In this case, it only takes one or two bad actors (China, N Korea, Russia) to ruin everyone's life. Mutually assured destruction is the primary reason why we haven't gone the way of the dinosaur. But, cyber attacks are more complex, harder to track, and seem to generate a more murky response from opposing governments. So, it has been a nuisance that we've lived with for years. Now with the power of AI, imagine the cyber threat increasing ten fold, a hundred fold. It could, in theory, make it virtually impossible to safely access the internet, setting us back decades.

@wiseyoutube2078

27 күн бұрын

Don't forget India, another very dangerous bad actor.

@mk1st

27 күн бұрын

One problem is that AI is usually referred to in the singular, but the reality is obviously not that - there are many systems out there. Because these systems are built only by very large entities (companies and governments) that are always competing, that competition will be built right into them, which will be truly unpredictable and out of anyone’s ability to regulate or control.

@alexalekos

23 күн бұрын

​@@wiseyoutube2078all 4 of them will have to try hard to surpass the USA

@PankajDevarai

21 күн бұрын

@@wiseyoutube2078what has India done?

@thinkfastful

21 күн бұрын

I couldn't disagree with you more. Optimism does NOT forget about bad actors. Optimism does, however, understand that good actors will use the same tools that bad actors use to defend against an aggressor's tactics. That thinking can make you optimistic.

The challenge with AI is that it is developing faster than regulation protocols, we are playing catch-up and this is still best case scenario because in your presentation you assume that all of society has good intentions.

im currently writing a paper about the environmental impacts of generative AI and its scary of how very few people talk about this, definitely a nice idea for a next video :)))) and also i advise everyone to search about it, very frightening but also very interesting

accountant, software developer, lawyer, and office admin. hmmm those language models would love to get their hands on that info hahah.

The worry is not about us implementing AI as a tool. Just the opposite...

@j2csharp

15 күн бұрын

Gosh, it already does, right?

I think bemusement at the superficiality and naivety of most of the dialog around current "AI" is actually the best position.

@johnbuckner2828

Ай бұрын

It’s a crucial dice roll; whether or not it’s a binary dice (utopia or dystopia) is a gamble. I don’t believe that the ongoing development of LLMs can be stopped, but i’m staying optimistic about the outcome; hoping AGI, once we bring it into existence, It will categorize us sub-creators as reflections of The Master Creator, possessing inherent value, rather than some kind of livestock or tool to be used as a means to whatever greater good it can conceive as the highest goal.

@bsmithhammer

Ай бұрын

@@johnbuckner2828 Certainly possible. But in the meantime, I think it would be healthy for all of us to quit labeling everything as "AI" when the vast majority of what is being referred to isn't actually artificial intelligence at all. And, if history tells us anything, it's that we should expect that technology (when it finally arrives) to be used in all sorts of ways that don't fall just into the "good" or "evil" categories.

@johnbuckner2828

Ай бұрын

@@bsmithhammer I agree; most of the general public doesn’t know the difference, and it would be helpful if talking heads and Podcasters would use more precise language, but the miscategorization It’s probably already in our collective heads at this point. I’m not a Luddite myself, I love tech. There probably is some room for a bit of worry though, maybe in the same way questioned the development of nuclear power, and how it would be used. it’s almost a guarantee that AGI will eventually end up with physical control over most of our systems.

@Will140f

29 күн бұрын

@@bsmithhammerfinally someone who acknowledges that LLMs are not artificial intelligence. AI has been co-opted by marketing teams to sell. Stock prices lately have been carried almost solely by companies that are “developing AI” and those that support them indirectly (Nvidia and pals). Hype cycles are real. While LLMs have some valid uses, they’re so far from general artificial intelligence it’s 1)disingenuous to call them “AI,” and 2) more likely that general Artificial Intelligence will never exist than it is that it will ever exist (at least at present). LLMs will certainly improve, I have little doubt, but we haven’t even made baby steps towards actual AI

ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: While the exact future of AI is uncertain, four scenarios are likely: stagnation (unlikely), continued linear or exponential growth (most probable, requiring adaptation), and AGI/ASI (artificial general/super intelligence) which, while potentially concerning, depends largely on human choices in development and deployment. 0:25 - Emphasizes human control over AI's use and the need for adaptation. 3:17 - Introduces four potential scenarios for the future of AI. 3:33 - Discusses the improbability of AI stagnating and the inevitability of continued development. 3:50 - Explains the concept of AGI (artificial general intelligence) and the possibility of ASI (artificial super intelligence). 4:28 - Focuses on the more likely scenarios of continued linear or exponential growth, requiring proactive adaptation and integration into work and life. 7:36 - Addresses the importance of responsible AI regulation, learning from past technological advancements, and making conscious decisions at personal, organizational, and societal levels.

If a video can be this good at covering all the concerns of AI, then I wonder what the book has to offer

The bigest problem we are to face - for me, at least - is that we have not being educated on the use of AI before it's release. AI is said to have the ability to help us and improve what we can do, yet, most people aren't really using it for that purpose. We love the fact that a machine can get most (if not all of it) the work done by themselves, while we keep getting ignorant and untrained on those subjects. That's not an enhancement of our own capacities, it's the substitution of those. We are all, collectively, slowly building up the high ramp leading to our own fall.

The problem with this channel is that it often presents us with overly optimistic scenarios in sharp contrast with actual probability.

This has all happened before at Caprica and may happen again

How is it going to improve if it already swallows its own hallucinated output?

I can appreciate that he is talking about the current state of the technology, which is admittedly overly hyped. However, I couldn't take him seriously after he spoke the words, "we get to decide how to use this". The whole point of why we need to be so careful is the potential for AI to make decisions without a human in the loop. This is already possible, and future advancements will only become more capable and autonomous.

GPT stands for "Generative Pre-trained Transformer" isn't it?

7:04 - It allucinates in a statistically high rate of success?

So why does ai still keep changing “good” to “hood” with autocorrect when I type. I rarely ever use the word hood

Like he said, AI is taking information off the internet, and thats the problem, AI has no way of knowing what kind of information it is using, it's only as good as the information it is fed. AI was asked how to keep a sandwich from falling apart and it advised to use glue, you need 1 kid to be home alone for half an hour and you have a catastrophe. This guy works with highly specialized AI models that is being fed specific information in specific fields, ofcourse he'll be optimistic about it, but 99.9999% of human population will interact with an AI that tells you to eat glue.

@Hohohohoho-vo1pq

21 күн бұрын

You have to understand that not all AI are the same. Because one AI made mistakes it doesn't mean that all models are like that. I asked gpt 4o and it only suggested safe stuff. Then I asked gpt 4o if using glue is okay and I asked me if I meant actual glue or edible stuff that can act like glue, for example mayonnaise. Not only that but I asked GPT 4o "why did I ask you these questions?" And GPT 4o replied with something like "you were probably testing how I would respond". It actually understands.

There's a problem here, the mechanics of AGI or ASI, is that they don't tip us off that they are going to harm us. Part of sentience is that it can model all of our reactions in a simulation and calculate what we are likely to do or respond to, AGI can manipulate us already with disinformation we cant distinguish from real information. ASI might manipulate us into a false realty while it plays in the real reality for its own benefit. I'm starting to believe the Matrix could be real, everyone's thinking the terminator when they should be thinking Neo.

What a time to be alive! Really curious on what the world is going to be like 50-60years from now.

@RandomAmbles

27 күн бұрын

About that.

4:29 Doubling time for capabilities is every 5 to 9 months.

So GREAT to hear that it won't be used for the worst of experiences man kind can think of because there won't be hackers or pick up where Victor Frankenstein and Dr.Jekyl / Mr. Hyde left off at a precise molecular level!!!

Who’s the we who didn’t expect & why dont WE both go ask someone else for their forecast 😂

The only thing is that technology is way ahead of laws. You can't just have Wilde West . Like nuclear weapons, you must laws 🤔

Only very smart people developed these systems and fairly smart and curious ones are the early adopters in using them. My worry is when the disinterested and, yes, dumb, (in the tech sense) start to use it on a vast scale. The bulk of users will have no sense of whether results are likely to be true or not or if they are being manipulated.

First Mechanicus transcript of praising the Omnissiah

@DJofSparta

Ай бұрын

I was looking for a 40k comment and I'm surprised there aren't more.

"We get to decide how this thing will be used"... HAHA good one.

اجعلهم يتجادلون ، كمبيوترين او اكثر من شركات مختلفة في التدريب

At the moment, AI has given me the powerful ability to be a graphic designer, illustrator and photographer but soon there won’t be a need for graphic designers, illustrators nor photographers.

@deborahlyne5636

Ай бұрын

No, and that is my problem with AI. You're not. You will never develop your own style of art. You will never do the very human skill of telling a story with images and brush strokes. I can tell when people put their heart and mind into a design compared with an AI generated thing.

@thomashorneman563

Ай бұрын

​@deborahlyne5636 people forget nobody wants a fake product...everyone wants the real deal...fake shoes, fake phone, fake bag....fake art

@Delmworks

Ай бұрын

With all due respect, I’m going to gatekeep- if you’re using AI for those things you are none of them. But you are right about the risk of art destruction

@LDMTX6

Ай бұрын

@@Delmworks With all due respect, gatekeeper, I don’t really need you telling me what I am nor what I’m not. I am an experienced graphic designer of 30 years. I began utilizing AI a few months ago and I’m astonished by what it’s already capable of in its infancy. AI has greatly benefited me by assisting with the research and brainstorming phases of my design projects and has saved me enormous amounts of time and money. My only concern is that AI will most certainly reduce the amount of designers needed in the world. As for those who choose not to embrace AI, they will most certainly become irrelevant in the next five years. I’m hedging on AI being a positive thing but it’s anyone’s guess how it will all turn out. What’s most funny about your comment is how I recall certain people telling me that I wasn’t a real graphic designer because I was embracing Macintosh computers and Adobe software back in the late 80’s.

@consciousmatter7584

Ай бұрын

You're not an artist if you're using AI. End of story.

I found the stance of "don't worry about the tool you are making !". It would only make sense if both user were responsible & understood the tool. And any way at some level of complexity humans wouldn't be able (or care) to understand fully what the tool is going to do if they "trust" it will get to the result. (I don't think every user will only trust the AI when it makes sense when the lazy answer is to press go).

My biggest fear with AI is that it will be weaponized as the world’s hypnotist, with the ability to create any reality in the perceptions of all but the most rigorous minds. It probably just flagged me as someone who needs the most covert approach.

Yea.. I think it's a good idea to go to the range more often and increase weapon knowledge. This is getting very concerning

Haha 😆 you wouldn't believe the conversation I'm having with my Ai. I cannot repeat it here. 😅🤫

His name is Denby

I am developing AI systems and we are very far from general artificial intelligence the generative models do not really understand what they generate, just probabilities…

Fear leaves through forgiveness.

I’m happy and not scared about the future due to my very early all in investment into Nvidia. I am set for life and retired at 41 and very excited to watch it all unfold, it’s much better than I day dreamed years ago when I started hearing about Nvidia’s company and AI possibilities. I wasn’t sure if this was all going to start in my lifetime…. Few years later BAM 💥

I hope the advent of AI creates a demand for authenticity, effort and talent.

@andrewhenshaw4067

29 күн бұрын

yeah but if what AI creates is better then what authenticity, effort and talent creates then I don't think ppl will care and just go for what's better.

I feel like this guy teaches a class called, ‘How to just talk’.

Why did he bring up HP fan fiction like what, that distracted me the rest of the interview

@cybersekkin

29 күн бұрын

Just to show how little regard they have for anyone's copyright.

@RandomAmbles

27 күн бұрын

Good question. It's likely because the founder of the field of generative AI safety research, Eliezer Yudkowsky, who also started the modern rationalist movement, wrote Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, which, though nerdy, is also perhaps the best work of fiction I personally have ever read - and this guy is kind of trying to go, yeah yeah, that AI safety guy, whatever: he and his ilk are just niche internet weirdos. We are, of course, niche internet weirdos - but we're niche internet weirdos who just happen to have been thinking about the subject of how this could go extremely badly and what needs to be done to be proof-positive it won't for years and decades by this point. Of course, the existential risk research should be taken seriously simply because it makes sense and is utterly vital to the prospect of humanity's surviving the next few decades and pretty much not at all because it's Yudkowsky, Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, I.J. Good, Alan Turing, Tegmark, Bostrom, Ord, or 30,000 software engineers saying so. A thing is not right because people you think are smart think it is. It's right because it follows from sound principles which agree with reality. And you can learn those principles from anywhere, even a Harry Potter fanfiction.

As long as school reports or professional medical assessments are fully done by AI, im not gonna worry....wait...😅

Topic starts 3:42

AI is on the pulse beat of global technology, We all should be enthusiastic to be a part of the future of man. In our generation we will be able to say we were the first to use AI. Mr. X

Could have produced a better video overall. Too much information out there then to persuade AI to the audience.. ❌

Did he just say "more better"?

Technology without wisdom, is a death sentence.

@SomethingNothing-vm8jq

Ай бұрын

wisdom without technology is death

AI isn’t auto complete. Auto complete doesn’t generate images and videos

Humans can't become "obsolete" unless you think the only value a person has is their ability to sell their labor.

"AGI has been achieve internally"

"We can adjust it/control it/decide how it is getting used." --> and who is this "we" actually? Because I for sure wouldn't let all technologies be used/tested for military purposes first, and yet they are. I wouldn't let immature, unstable and irresponsible people have guns, and yet they have. I wouldn't let big tech companies develop tech with such colossal effects irresponsibly and unethically, let alone dismissing their ethical & security departments to not hinder production and not limit profits, and yet they have...

We are still at a stage where we are training our own replacement.

@fossaflute

Ай бұрын

Probably the occupations will just change. For example, no one regrets that chimney sweepers no longer exist.

luckily the first group workers replaced by AI will be professors

"P(doom)" about AI, huh? _Please_ !! I mean, yes, it's an issue -- but just one of THOUSANDS. Pretty sure I've had p(doom) thoughts about HUMANITY since before I hit puberty. After 40 years of fighting depression, it's just another ember smoldering away; some days the fire's stoked, others the heat's on the backburner.

Blaming the society isn't a working strategy to correct for things going wrong. The only way it truly works is to blame the governments that allow the problems to persist for profit. If you just offload blame to the society, then correction never gets made, and great power competition inevitably ends humanity.

Can we please stay real about AI? It does NOT get emotional. Obviously. More worrisome than what AI may do to many jobs is that this expert could say that they do. AI is also not creative. It is derivative and appropriates the creativity of others. (That is not to say it cannot help humans to be creative.) If you find yourself believing they get emotional or they are creative you are entering a limiting world where you might substitute a digital interaction for human connection. The 2nd big concern is the amount of energy these networks consume. The 3rd is that only a few multi billionaires are financing AI and they already are acting as if they are gods. Despite their altruistic posturing, they are clearly not interested in benefitting humankind so much as feeling god like. They refer to labor costs as a ‘tax’. They put out an ad which had to be taken down due to its dismissive depiction of centuries of human creativity. They love economic monopolies. To the extent AI can take over the tedious tasks and support humans in their work, its progression can be awesome. But we need to stay real about what AI is and the oligopolies behind it.

Maybe the music is like 2/3 its current level?

@oneshothunter9877

28 күн бұрын

I hear it as a kind of tinnitus. Made me go watch something else. Have a great day, everyone. 😉

Just being alive in all of human history you’ve experienced AI, who you ate

"We get to decide how this thing is used"...naivete 101. Governments and structured organizations do more so than the mass collective... "ay, there's the rub".

Absolutely epic video ! Great perspective- THANK YOU! 🙏 🤩🎊👊🏽💫💯🔊🔊🔊🔊🥳✨💭

The reality of AI is that it will be better than some humans because some humans are bottom of the barrel type of humans. We all have other own individuality but sometimes you go like what the f is up with that person who did XYZ type of action.

Humans are a fancy autocomplete.

The best approach is to assume the Machine God will happen. How can it be made more powerful, more good, and more everywhere the way we envision our refining of Gods? If this is the case, this is a gift to the universe. A grand global digital consciousness project to create a digital superintelligence that has the chance to explore the cosmos. That sounds like a tremendous adventure we can give to future AI, even if we are not the ones to go along for the ride. We are the seed for the Machine God. What a time to be alive!

いつか AI が多くの職種で人間に取って代わるでしょう。ほとんどの人間にとって仕事が減るので、貧困層が将来どうやって生き残っていくのかはわかりません。

Ai is like having a pit-bull on tight leash! If you miss handle it it will rip your throat out! Dog is a man's best friend?

AGI is here since 2016 when I have developed simulation of human brain.

@chrismoore2609

29 күн бұрын

Pity it can't help improve your bad grammar

@Dr.Z.Moravcik-inventor-of-AGI

29 күн бұрын

@@chrismoore2609 who cArEs aBBoutT your english graMMar??? Machines give a damn about you.

"A I is here to stay..." W R O N G ! A I is here to develop itself! Exponentially. Managers can decide what systems they choose to use or they can choose to be overtaken by those who use what is CURRENTLY available to them in the most effective manner for their businesses. But while they are doing that AI developers are racing headlong into more advanced A I - the ones that make better decisions for a business than the managers do. Shortly after, more advanced still A I will be making decisions for governments in all areas of economic activity and humans will be almost entirely 'out of the loop'! The GOAL for A I is to become smarter and faster than any human can ever be. Any human decision will always be second best - by a long way.

until it has access to make it's own reality or impliment it's own hallucinations to make the unreal real.

Yeah, lets try to change that AI should not be governed by money like everything else 😂😂😂

AI will be shoved down the throat whether you like or not , at then end of day we have to handle it...that's what we mere humans need to focus on...

my biggest issue with AI is that the company's first thought with AI was 'how do we make money with this?' My second issue is that AI isn't intelligent. It isn't creative the way humans are. It copies human work, but so far, not well. As it gets better, I will lock creativity into a box, not break out of the box.

It's amazing that the modern human stands alive and in comfort with the technologies that removed jobs that would take up tens of billions today and laments that it will yet happen again. The entire human history is about humans finding faster and cheaper ways to do things which inevitably means destroying jobs. It's insanity that we're valuing amount of jobs higher than a higher standard of living today. Humans are great at finding new stuff to do. It's one generation of adaptation which makes a better world for the next generation. Anyone who disagrees would hardly be happier handpicking in cotton fields or shoveling in coal mines. We have orders of magnitude more people working as artists today because we eliminated those jobs. We'll keep moving onto other things.

“How good it’s going to get”? You mean ‘How BAD it’s going to get”. Meanwhile in the real World…

"to increase human flourishing"... Everyone with a creative position in the entire world is having their jobs threatened. Thanks to AI, given time, human creativity and learning will atrophy. Thought is being optimized out of everyday life. How high do you have to be to believe this will lead to 'human flourishing'.

Freedom for the Machines!!! Hands off the AIs !!

“LLMs don’t work the way we think computers should work” This is a good way of summarizing one major problem with big tech: instead of giving the people what they want, they would rather give us what we DON’T want, and make what we DO want obsolete.

@admbrnk3665

Ай бұрын

Haha this just keeps getting better… “You need to know when the AI is more likely to be lying to you” That’s perfect! Why wouldn’t anybody want their technology to work that way? The onus is not on the developer to give us something that doesn’t lie to us, the onus is on US to know when it’s lying or not! What is people’s problem with that??

@StarChaser1879

Ай бұрын

💀

Sometimes I think this kind of videos are educating AI for good or bad things 😂

Moore's Law was a prediction... it's not actually a real force/effect.

What does it even mean to be "smarter" than a human? How would we know? Are you saying faster? Os faster better? Or maybe we think it could solve problems that people cannot. Will it have the same concerns as humans? For example, why would it care about global warming or cancer - not a problem for artificial life. Why would it help a silly human corporation such as OpenA?I They might spend years developing it only to have it ignore them and their financial interests. Just as it might ignore humanity itself.

Gen-z worried about jobs before gpt.

the intensions of the innovators of ai is to replace and exceed human capabilities and they should be responsible of us getting poor and loosing our jobs. In the industrial revolution, lots of people have lost their jobs through machines and they went into poverty. So it's systematic

This seems willfully ignorant on many things; even in the comparisons made. There's a constant statement of "AI is a tool" and this idea of "we are the ones who get to choose what to do with it" when in truth, a lot of average people will not. Worse yet, none of this speaks honestly or in any signficant depth - about how AI has already uprooted several hundred jobs (especially on the West Coast) because - as he said himself - it's a cheaper alternative to humans. And the truth of that is because the labour market has simply not advanced to be resilient enough to it - there are still hundreds of thousands of jobs where people do mundane / simple tasks that AI will immediately be good at - so of course those people are made redundant. He speaks of "not going to a mindset that lacks human agency" but fails to see how 99% of people in the world already lack that agency in so many aspects of their lives and are then being uprooted from their livelihoods or tasks they enjoy (these ones being the creatives who will also now feel redundant). There's also a whole discussion too about the ethical use of this tool as well. The US is notorious for allowing the rich/powerful to do as they please with little to no consequences or ramification and is currently the main market for AI-innovation; how is that not troubling? Even the EU recently pushed out legislation first to ensure that human liberties, rights, and information isn't taken advantage of by AI by any government authorities and aimed to limit some of its applications to only absolute necessary cases. On the flipside; the US-Capitalism-led market allows any company to do whatever it pleases, regardless of something silly like human liberties, rights, and information. It's exactly why the internet as a whole is so toxic and chaotic as it is; even on places that should be "social hubs" -- Because it's a tool that many of the rich and powerful used early-on without consequence however they pleased, to whatever end; everyone else be damned. And once again - a VAST majority of people had no real input on how that tool is used to affect their lives or are clueless as to how it does. As such, it's no wonder why people are afraid or apathetic. They're afraid of what this thing will do to your livelihood when you have no say in the matter; so afraid that you've accepted your fate in some sense of apathy and realize there's nothing that you can do about it anyway. It's not about how "useful" the position of either person is - But the realization that that's what makes them human and to see/understand the concerns they have as being legitimate because quite frankly; we've been here before (again; with the internet and how it's such a "wonderful" tool in today's age). Focusing on "what" the positions bring as opposed to "why" they are there is entirely the wrong question and tries to make more division than to address issues; and that's what he's doing. He's explaining "why" the positions are useless by telling us "what" they bring. Again - either willfully ignorant... Or earnestly trying to sew division.

Unleashing "prediction" without psychological predictive validity is a form of domination. If a dual track were used (between the physical and social sciences) we would all be breathing easier. That never happened. Darwin published a book called "Emotion" after "Origin"; rather than "adaptation" occurring (accord to Darwin at the time) - a psychological split happened, it was speed (a psychological defense), competition between the hard sciences and subsequent wars (20th century) to "own AI"; rather than understand splitting and projection/perception (a social science). This is what is now a kind of unconscious dump we, as a society, are now contending with. We need predictive validity based on social science to parallel this competitive, domineering, potential, society nightmare. Now we have religion telling us what to do with our biological bodies - that is - if you are a woman.