Gentlemen, we can all agree that we don't want a WW3, but as a wise man once said "you have to be prepared for anything, so learn everything you can before every thing blows up"

@LP-fy8wr

Жыл бұрын

I could not agree with you more. We sure AF do NOT need a WW3. Lets focus on unlocking the secrets of the universe and work together to better human kind.

@Akshay-hn2cj

Жыл бұрын

@@LP-fy8wr 🤣

@LP-fy8wr

Жыл бұрын

@@Akshay-hn2cj Clearly you have never experienced anything close to war. You seem sheltered. Enjoy that while you can kid.

@mwh0588

Жыл бұрын

@@LP-fy8wr I wish for everybody on earth World War 3. Because its time to make a step forward to new technologies, a new decade of development in Mankind: After war, there will be Peace!

@Motyka364

Жыл бұрын

I don’t want ww3 no one does but I do believe it is necessary and inevitable because think about it our civilization always strives to be better and that means no commies also our future is space exploration it just is that’s a fact and do you really believe a species developed enough to make first contact with us would risk doing so with a species as divided as us and as corrupt as our comie nations. That is why we must eliminate communism and sadly the only way to do so is war. But yes, of course noone wants wars

Actually, from my experience in the military, our nukes are running on 1950s tech purposefully to avoid hacking. Using old computers that need hard disks are kept around for that reason. I even have a Loraine 500 and use it lol. One day, we may all need an old comp to avoid big brother

@Rimasta1

Жыл бұрын

They are upgrading the entire apparatus from the silos to the new sentinel ICBM’s. I agree with you but it seems someone higher up than us thinks otherwise.

@Tracy-xe9zu

Жыл бұрын

I work in network security, and that brings me so much relief that our nukes have old-school tech; you can't hack analog!

@Wolf_Ghost

Жыл бұрын

@@Tracy-xe9zu It has a warmer sound

Imagine being ready to fight a battle and then what you see is a bunch of small tank things that are eating your fighting force away with machine gun fire.

@brandonfremer6367

Жыл бұрын

“Enemy wheelson deployed”

@RickyL305

Жыл бұрын

@@brandonfremer6367 my thoughts exactly 💯

@sapereaude6274

Жыл бұрын

Or literally eating your fighting force a la by then more advanced EATR robots

MacArthur: Nuke Em! Truman: No! MacArthur: NUKE EM! Truman: NO! MacArthur: AH COME ON! Truman: You’re fired!

@maleekclarke9948

Жыл бұрын

Oversimplified

@AlexPanda314

Жыл бұрын

@@maleekclarke9948 ikr

@bingus_number1

Жыл бұрын

Nice reference

@LeBaldo

Жыл бұрын

Nice

@kbrock9146

Жыл бұрын

I see we are people of culture here.

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." ― Albert Einstein

I love the way you do your videos! I have fun and get informed at the same time! Thanks for such a good moment!

The Black Knight is hopeless in urban warfare though. It can only advance forward 2 blocks before it has to move 1 block laterally.

@thomaslove6494

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣.... Then it has to wait for the oponent to make a move...

@Wolf_Ghost

Жыл бұрын

It's not finished in development from what I know. The concept is good. Just needs to be slapped together.

@mikemcgee5950

Жыл бұрын

Needs anti armor weapons

@spencervance8484

Жыл бұрын

@@Wolf_Ghost hes making a joke comparing the new tank to a chess piece

@michaelscott7166

Жыл бұрын

@@spencervance8484 Spoilsport!

“Do not pray for easy lives gentlemen, pray to be stronger men.” John F Kennedy

@DEDETheMenace

Жыл бұрын

🙏🏼

@M4A1BestGirl

Жыл бұрын

@@DEDETheMenace It’s a Black Ops Zombies reference but I think he actually said this.

@gregbarnes4083

Жыл бұрын

@@M4A1BestGirl Yup he actually said it in 1963

2:28 Imagine it being your first day in the war and getting 360 no scoped by a tin can with wheels

@stevetennispro

Жыл бұрын

That would be Dalektable! ;)

Love the content! Lately all the hypothetical stories are all bangers. Nice.

That's why the knowledge to make improvised explosive devices is so important!

Wonderful first one here, great videos man. Y’all always keep me hyped up to see new videos

@HOLLASOUNDS

Жыл бұрын

Your 23rd actually.

Day 1: WW3 breaks out. Day 2: The world has ended. Nukes Nukes Nukes and nothing else!

@joelteague1190

Жыл бұрын

It ain't going to be World War III it's going to be the battle of Armageddon

"there are no countermessures that can stop hypersonic missiles" There are. Its just no military will tell you just how they can stop them because then the enemy can fix that issue

@-p2349

Жыл бұрын

LASERS

@Daquavious_Bingleton-III

Жыл бұрын

@@-p2349 zero hour flashbacks

Great vid to watch before bed 💀💀

I love how fast infographics makes videos, 1 or 2 daily

One of the assumption here is that the air defence is so weak, that it allows the aircraft to enter their space and drop the robot. The chances of that happening are very low in the first place. A superpower will have state-of-the-art anti-aircraft systems (not like Rus one!).

@artonline01

Жыл бұрын

The US is very good at taking out air defences. They have been doing well since the 60s.

@usa5450

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@austin756

Жыл бұрын

And if air defense is taken out, then just send himars/cruise missiles to the location. Why the need to drop the robot?

@artonline01

Жыл бұрын

@@austin756If you want to keep the infrastructure The rockets may be too destructive.

I'm guessing this guy never heard of EMP shield. Who partnered with the military a few years ago to EMP protect their equipment

@tracycormorant6711

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. I thought the mars ROVs may have been contained in avFaraday cage before deployment to the active battle field

@vhmdl5150

Жыл бұрын

There are only two companies that make Very Large Transformers. There is an 18 month lead time. According to best case scenarios, if just a couple VLTs are taken out roughly 90% of the US will die within a year. The military may have protected their equipment, the power grid, not so much.

@Kman31ca

Жыл бұрын

They've been hardening military facilities and platforms against emp's since the 60's.

@vhmdl5150

Жыл бұрын

@@Kman31ca Still does nothing for the commercial grid. Congress and researchers have said as much over the last 7 years.

@TheGrindcorps

Жыл бұрын

??? This is nothing new. Soviet and now Russian equipment has always been shielded and designed with nuclear warfare in mind.

It is absolutely INCREDIBLE how far technology has come!

Can we not tempt the law of attraction please...

@Youngnezz

Жыл бұрын

That was my first thought when I saw the title and then I look down and see your comment

@selinaxo1008

Жыл бұрын

Legit. My same thought as well. We all on the same wave length 😅

@hellboundchaoscommand7567

Жыл бұрын

No

Intelligence is the deadliest weapon there possibly is.🧠

“One of the deadliest and most powerful weapons of WW3…….. will be lines of code.” I swear I heard lines of coke 🤣

@nichsulol4844

Жыл бұрын

@Content_enjoyer weapon look like plastic toy at all

If there ever was to be a WWIII..........it would be the strangest war you'd ever see! Sonic, energy, particle, etc weapons. Even warheads that don't explode, but disintegrate their targets, straight outta Star Trek! Los Angeles saw the missile malfunction that carried this weapon, on a pacific test. News video questioned if the launch was a ufo.

@sexygeek8996

Жыл бұрын

WW 3 might start this year.

I was gonna say, EMP's will end almost all these and be devastating. Also, the military has tons of EMP hardened equipment

@nichsulol4844

Жыл бұрын

the beam rifle

@christophernewell2026

Жыл бұрын

Most if not all military vehicles, aircraft and warships already utilize redundant EMP hardened electronics in critical systems. The effect on US/NATO assets would be less than the video claims. The bulk of the problems would come from civilian infrastructure that is not hardened.

The MAARS sounds cool but can you imagine the collateral damage? Presumably it would be driven by AI, and that could help, but then it's one glitch away from Judgement Day. Also, why airdrop something with so much armor?

F22/35s, B-2s, A-10s, Abrams, Javlins. Only to name a few for USA

@-p2349

Жыл бұрын

B-21 is almost complete

Can you imagine being in the IT department during a robot war

@illuminatiwilldie9290

Жыл бұрын

The IT guys are the new medics. They would definitely be a major target.

Great video

The CV-90 Ghost and similar vehicles will play a massive part in ww3

The rifle mentioned at the start is the XM5. The X stands for experimental and is the current designation of the rifle as it is still being trialled. If however the rifle starts being issued, then it’s no longer experimental. Therefore the video would have been more accurate saying that troops were issued with an M5.

The notion of an E-Bomb turning the tide of a war assumes the high tech equipment has zero shielding from EMP

@vhmdl5150

Жыл бұрын

Military may be shielded, critical infrastructure, not so much.

The last weapon has won my respect. Diplomacy . Talk your enemy out of hostility 💐🙏

“It’s the end of the world as we know it, it’s the end of the world as we know it, it’s the end of the as we know it and I feel fine.” REM

Is amazing how most of the stuff shown here as future weapons has been presented in video games, like Call Of Duty and Battlefront, for quite a while now.

Great video.

I was under the impression that the US successfully tested a hypersonic missile several months ago. Did I imagine that? I swear it was on the news and whatnot. Edit- I looked it up just to be sure, and yes we did. In July. "The United States successfully tested two Lockheed Martin Corp hypersonic missiles recently, the Pentagon said on Wednesday, amid growing concerns Russia and China have had more success developing their own hypersonic weapons.-Jul 13, 2022"

@-p2349

Жыл бұрын

US hypersonic missile budget (R and D) is about 5 billion dollars

@VJ-bn8ny

Жыл бұрын

They did and one thing the video doesn't mention is Russia "hypersonic" missile is just an ICBM modified to be launched from a plane. It's not actual new tech like the Chinese hypersonic rocket artillery.

Nice. Thanks .

It will be really really expensive too, but that did not stop other wars when it should have. Further, high tech will only initially dominate in terms of numbers. After the stage of destroying a lot of communication and supply infrastructure, fighting for raw resources will start draw the complete population into the conflict. If E-Nukes are used, high tech production is gone, including for the agrarian sector. Surrender may just end in starvation so cease to be an option.

@terminallyballistic845

Жыл бұрын

Boots on the ground

@MrThejboe3oh5

Жыл бұрын

@@terminallyballistic845 you want to go boots on the ground against 3/4 of the planets population...You'd need India and they are staying neutral unless China really pushes them.

11:51 the most obvious defense against hypersonic missiles would be an upgrade to the XN-1 LaWS laser the US is using and long distance radar to detect hypersonic missiles early enough to take them down. Laser can shoot fast enough to get many attempts at hitting the missile and a single laser cannon could even get multiple attempts at hitting each missile of a swarm in turn, as long as charging up the laser is fast enough. Of course the laser needs to remain coherent over at least 1000km (I think?) and then still have enough power to contribute considerably to taking down a missile, if not take it down with one hit. I'm quite sure the US military is investigating this option or even are working on it. PS: according to my sources WW3 will actually be fought with Gundams...

@Rimasta1

Жыл бұрын

You’d need a very powerful laser for that since the missile itself is shielded from intense heat as it is.

@ButWhyWasTaken

Жыл бұрын

@@Rimasta1 yeah, as I said. It's just that speed ois the main issue and you can't shoot faster than light. I also said the military most likely looked into it, I didn't say they're definitely going with it cause I have no idea if lasers will be strong enough anytime soon or if it's still just sf.

@ostiariusalpha

Жыл бұрын

The laser merely requires a coherent range of 25km to be effective against a hypersonic missile. The laser alone doesn't need to destroy the missile itself either, it only has to weaken its heat shield enough to let the missile's own velocity destroy it or ablate the surface in such a way as to cause the missile to rapidly yaw, allowing high G inertia to finish it off.

Only thing you got wrong here is the hypersonic missile technology. ballistic missiles also travel at mach 5 or faster, the difference is that hypersonic missiles can change trajectory mid descent making their flight path unpredictable and therefore nearly impossible to shoot down. ballistic missiles travel in a very predictable ballistic arc and thus are very able to be shot down.

Awesome!

The drones give me Fast and Furious PTSD 😂⏳😂

Can we take a minute to appreciate the time and effort they put into their videos?

@rmont9100

Жыл бұрын

Nah

@FireFiend

Жыл бұрын

You legit could not have watched the video already

@user-pz5cn3oc3g

Жыл бұрын

@@FireFiend i don’t see anything about me mentioning that i watched the whole video

@Pierrot9315

Жыл бұрын

Especially considering the rythm of release, and their old videos

@EverettBurger

Жыл бұрын

For the last month, I've assumed it was the Pentagon that's been producing these videos.

that maars thing is dope

Why is UN not using Robots already?

@selinaxo1008

Жыл бұрын

I’m guessing because of the “dangers of AI”, a lot of ethical questions come into play.

@mapletreepower7038

Жыл бұрын

Too busy abusing children

@HOLLASOUNDS

Жыл бұрын

@@selinaxo1008 I know its possible to make robots that can target humans, face detection linked to a machine gun?

I want to drive the remote control tank. I’m also the last person who should be trusted driving a remote control tank, but that’s neither here nor there.

Gotta love speculation/fiction 😊

@justinanderson1706

Жыл бұрын

For real, both ground vehicles can be knocked out by a can of spray paint

@idr121

Жыл бұрын

Agree! As interesting as it is, it's to be taken with a grain of salt. Especially because entertainment value is one of the biggest agendas of the channel.

There is a big problem with the nuclear cyber part a nuclear attack would be near impossible because we still use DOS and floppy disk. So this would be extremely unlikely to remote into a system that old.

“Oh s*** world war too soon? Well Teddy’s droppin bombs so you best go hide in your tuuube!” Theodore Roosevelt

Robots will never be able to replace the human soldier.

@commiesnzombies

Жыл бұрын

rise of the machines

Even if unmanned equipment is disposable they still cost money and are limited in quantity that’s the reality of logistics and logistics makes or breaks of war

Dude thanks I am so much more informed on our impending doom :D

So this is the perfect moment to launch a startup which developing emp defence technology

I'm sure this won't be foreshadowing any major historical events

I’ve has this theory and I’ve been looking for somehwere to test it (this seems as good a place as any): at some point in the future missiles (fired from a jet) will become obsolete. The armour always catches up eventually, and so the weapon will always change and be improved upon. If missiles in aerial combat become obsolete due to countermeasures wouldn’t it be prudent to create a fighter jet that can outmanoeuvre all the others? And if hyper and supersonic missiles are somehow turned into anti-air missiles wouldn’t outmanoeuvring them be more reliable than your standard countermeasure?

@lukefarnham2119

Жыл бұрын

Jets are limited by the pilots physical limitations. Too many gs and the pilot blacks out and loses control

@ReefzYT

Жыл бұрын

@@lukefarnham2119 yes, true. However, every other pilot is restricted by those same rules. Some pilots are better at taking Gs than others… so it’s almost like a WWII dogfight, it’s up to the pilot and their skill, not the plane. I can see the limitations however, so what could be a reasonable alternative? A new weapon of sorts?

@ReefzYT

Жыл бұрын

A drone might be the best solution. It could turn, climb and roll without causing the pilot to blackout. It could at least pull manoeuvres a manned jet couldn’t. But I just can’t shake the idea that no matter how good the drone or it’s pilot may be, a manned craft is always going to have some advantage and will always be used on the battlefield.

@lukefarnham2119

Жыл бұрын

@@ReefzYT A drone would be the next logical step. Also, it does help to have a maneuverable aircraft, the more maneuverable, the more the pilot can take advantage of. The quality of the g suit the pilot wears is also a factor, and how conditioned the pilot is to withstand high gs. Planes now a days are pretty much all maneuverable, fighter jet speaking, but I can imagine how quickly the jet can get to the pilots max g tolerance would play a very important role. It's rate of turn. A drone has no human physical limitations, just those of the airframe. So I would imagine they will be able to turn circles around human pilots. I can imagine they'll have a very advanced array of sensors, so situational awareness will also be impressive. The one advantage I would give human pilots is intuition and experience. It's an interesting time we live in, and only time will tell.

@ReefzYT

Жыл бұрын

@@lukefarnham2119 As young blood hoping to make the air force one day this is really insightful, thanks a lot.

For space combat use rail guns and equipment soldiers with mag boots to resist recoil. Faster than lasers and can deal damage to cover and oppositional equipment, bruh we have the tech to use the extra stuff

Will laser guns replace bullet guns like we see in Star wars and Star trek? 😅🔫 Shooting super heated plasma instead, At say 30,000°c? +

@HOLLASOUNDS

Жыл бұрын

The blasters and cannons in Starwars dont use lasers they are bullets they light up different colours due to the plasma they generate due to the reactive compounds.

@eaphantom9214

Жыл бұрын

@@HOLLASOUNDS But will they replace old fashioned lead? Only time will tell...

@HOLLASOUNDS

Жыл бұрын

@@eaphantom9214 I got this information at school from a star wars book which had split diagrams of the ammunition of blasters and they looked similar to the inside of smart bullets shown in this video.

The XM program was canceled a while back, as was the the whole future warrior program. Still loved the rest of the episode though!

@mapletreepower7038

Жыл бұрын

When the xm25 came up I just cringed

This feels like foreshadowing

On the topic of unmanned robots, wouldn’t a simple emp just mess them up? That being the case the simple solution would just be to create small personal emp’s to defeat these

@ozgurruh2535

Жыл бұрын

İ don't think you can just go "lets invent this" and then just find a way to built it

@ItsMeObvs

Жыл бұрын

@@ozgurruh2535 I’m pretty sure EMP’s are already invent bro. Maybe the refinement process is needed but it’s hardly just a though 🤨

@ozgurruh2535

Жыл бұрын

@@ItsMeObvs i mean the personal small EMP's bro

@ItsMeObvs

Жыл бұрын

@@ozgurruh2535 refrindement of an already known technology isn’t hard. Even if not large area EMP’s would nullify these none the less

These killstreaks have been in cod for years

I think we should develop some artificial intelligence to run our future war machines. They could be easily controlled by a web of satellites. A net in the sky, if you will. That's actually a pretty catchy name...

@-p2349

Жыл бұрын

Skynet

@thomaslove6494

Жыл бұрын

That sounds like an amazing idea! 🤣

@kato_dsrdr

Жыл бұрын

That's EXACTLY what skynet is.

@Creax-X-

Жыл бұрын

Like an Droid Army, there are even robots on two feet that can hold rifles to replace foot soldiers now

@justoneman1681

Жыл бұрын

@@thomaslove6494 I'm not sure anyone besides you and I got the joke

Here's my more accurate and concise version of this 20 minute video. "If world war 3 happens it will be fought with nukes." Funny how he never said anything about nuclear weapons, except as a point of comparison.

@sexygeek8996

Жыл бұрын

The war might take less time than the video.

@idr121

Жыл бұрын

Actually I disagree with the sentiment. I do think it's possible that it would start with a nuclear strike right off the bat, but I don't really think that it would realistically be the first resort. I do see it escalating into that and really doubt that no nuclear power is willing to take a loss under the chin just from conventional military forces, but an instant nuclear exchange doesn't really make much of sense in every situation - At the end of the day, I would argue that we are self destructive and insane as a species, but not idiots. Instant nuclear exchange is instant loss for both sides. Also on your last point, I thought I heard him say he is excluding nuclear exchanges - I mean that would really destroy the entertainment value of the video, when talking about other types of military conflicts that could happen. World and politics ain't black & white.

at the end of the day war settles nothing

Strong IQ predictions thanks for ur information

More 100 day series plz!!!

If you only had robots on a battlefield you will have way vehicles lost. There is a difference from being in combat and using a remote controled robot; in combat you are in survival mode, with being out of danger you don't have that feeling.

To quote Johnson from Halo back then the army was equipped with sticks two sticks and a rock and we all had to share the Rock

Any nuclear capable nation would most certainly deploy their nuclear weapons if they were at a sufficiently large disadvantage and on the cusp of inevitable invasion. Also, the most powerful and effective EMP devices are still nuclear. And the most effective weapons below them, are the ones you've heard nothing about.

@Smenkhaare

Жыл бұрын

This Hypersonic missiles are such fluff right now

@pz20jacobcouttsrogue

Жыл бұрын

@@Smenkhaare bluff it’s bluff from Russia

@Smenkhaare

Жыл бұрын

@@pz20jacobcouttsrogue It is like the non-existent missle gap that the USSR supposedly had over the US in the early 1960's which was very untrue. The USSR had few missles and they were at a huge disadvantage to the US.

my favorite youtuber. always staying out of drama. always caring for their fans. always keeping it real with their fans. giving back to their fans. thank you.

@d2a_

Жыл бұрын

bot?

@RavenFilms

Жыл бұрын

@@777jaris I think he might be talking about KZread drama, and the fact that this channel has a fanbase that doesn’t leave the comments section looking like flame wars between trolls. But you are pretty jumpy about this, feeling left out huh?

@RavenFilms

Жыл бұрын

This goes for all 3 channels. I love that they include fan engagement in their videos, common on the SCP channel.

@danko5866

Жыл бұрын

🤖🤖

Best weapon will be the Phased Plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.

hello u are a grate KZreadrs

One word - Nuclear War

@rajveerkanojiya2985

Жыл бұрын

2nd word biological war

As a person that knows code very very well and has done some.. interesting things on the internet. I can tell you, viruses and hacking will be the most dangerous weapon of WW3. The things I can do and have done, let’s just say I know things.

@chrisfoster3772

Жыл бұрын

Thanks rex

Tanker drones will change air combat. They make the direction of attack unpredictable. The aircraft carriers can be farther from the attack location. In theory they could refuel other drones. Breakthroughs in battery technology. A solderer may have heated uniform for say Antarctica. Power (watts) will be carried around like any other supply item.

To think, these weapons are only the ones we know about... I'm sure a lot more highly advanced weaponry is being developed at Top Secret levels.

This is the weapons that we know about.

at 5:44 I was sure these was crocodiles until I looked closer xD

Thanks for helping me have nightmares last night 😂

Why not onbthe emp sensitive drones like the black knight have human company for a couple turrets armored and operated by gears with full range of movement, like a b52 bomber but more protective.

15:00 bruh lol that is the most unluckiest solider

This video is a very good explanation why i believe WWIII wont be a nuclear war n why i think nukes are obsolete now n why i think cyberwarfare and autonomous weaponry will make up most of the battles of WWIII

I think the XM-25 has already been removed from service.

Can you do a video about country georgia it has a lot of cool storys

Black knight looks less like a tank and more of an infantry fighting vehicle. It wouldn’t stand a chance against an M1 Abrams or equivalent. A well equipped infantry squad would also probably do pretty well against it.

@richardharmon647

6 ай бұрын

If the infantry squad has ATGMs then yes

Can't wait

I like how the narrator keeps saying will be instead of would be. Very uplifting.

I love how you still call it 'XM-5' when it will shed the X designation by the time it's being deployed.

@BiscuitDelivery

Жыл бұрын

@Content_enjoyer Sounds cool but military doctrine is to simply give it a designation number and leave it at that. M-16, M-14, M-4, M-27, etc

@BiscuitDelivery

Жыл бұрын

@Content_enjoyer M5 would be the base designation. A1 tag won't be added until there are later iterations. Same with the M16. Originally it was just the M16, but when they started making the M16A2 they renamed the original model the M16A1

I have heard someone say, "If the third world war is fought with nukes, the 4th will be fought with sticks and stone

that robot in first clip is actually a real thing. Estonian engineers from themis milrem made those

I don’t think recoil is the issue for guns in space. I think the lack of oxygen for igniting the gun powder in the shells is a bigger issue really lol

@brandonguffey5959

Жыл бұрын

You could probably make "space cartridges" that have a portion of the oxygen needed to ignite the gunpowder sealed inside of them.

@kieranharper261

Жыл бұрын

Modern gunpowder contains oxidizers, and since the mechanism is air tight, modern guns can fire in space without issue. Recoil would be the issue, if you're say 175 lbs on Earth, that recoil would need to be able to move 175 lbs, in 0g it could completely spin you around or send you flying backwards

@brandonguffey5959

Жыл бұрын

@@kieranharper261 my guess would be that miniature rockets for human troops will be likely while anything that uses kinetic force will have to be vehicle mounted or attached to an extra terrestrial surface like an asteroid.

@gregbarnes4083

Жыл бұрын

Modern gunpowder already contains its own oxidiser, so oxygen isn't an issue.

@StevePlaysSteveplaysyotube

Жыл бұрын

I’ll say this is when laser weapons come into play.

Just a matter of time until a terminator like weapon is developed

“The true art of war is winning a war without fighting.

@aldindurakovic8828

Жыл бұрын

Like making a Friend .....🤔🤔🤔🤔

Make a video about the Iranian army vs IRGC

Also, the XM25 project was scrapped many years ago.

0:43 their is no place safe Switzerland: am I a joke to you

Those Mars robots would drive straight into hidden trench holes

it would've been nice if you covered some more of the weapons being used by the eastern side ( mainly russia and china ) instead of mainly western equipment..

@maya07_11

Жыл бұрын

yeah this is basically a western weapons parade

No one: Nothing The guy that came with thermals at the party:

CANT WAIT FOR WW3 😄😄😄