Our history books have been written by people suffering from stockholm syndrome.

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Damn!!! I’m gonna pin this😅

@ajraol9032

Жыл бұрын

Their conscience is mortgaged to The West

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar* *He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Millions of salutations to our Hindu Warrior Veerangana Keerthi ji🚩* , who raised the flag of Hindu🚩 with the Power of her Bhakti in the Crowd of Billions. She is working 24/7 so hard to awaken, Enlighten, Open the Eyes, Tell the Truth, Facts, Reality to Siklar Sleeping Hindus🚩 *Jai Hindutva🚩Jai Hindu Rashtra 🚩Jai Jai Sri Ram🕉️🚩🚩*

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

​​@@KeerthihistoryWe Hindus Love alot Keerthi🙏U r the Gem of our Hindu Community U r true follower of Dharma, Satya🚩 Bhagwan bless you alot and give you more Strength🙏🕉️ Jai Sri Ram Hari Hara🙏🕉️

We know invaders story more than our own emperor.... This is the saddest thing about our knowledge... People like you are informing us with our real "the real" HISTORY... Respect for you Keerthi ❤❤

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

@LionsHeart3.1.3

10 ай бұрын

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

Your Channel Enriched me a lot. Till now only Northern India was raising their voice for our Hindu Dharma. Now Southern part of India is also raising it's voice through Hindus like you. Much respect from Karnataka,Jai Sri Ram

@manjunaik4320

6 ай бұрын

Being kannadiga, I think people of Bollywood are son of bitches to glorify the mughuls. I truly respect rajputs valor and bravery and I also urge every Indian to become yoddha to protect our sanatan dharm and culture..Jai hind Jai Shri Ram, Jai Hanuman 🙏🙏

He doesn't deserve to be great.. But he is definitely the best out of the worst..🙌🏻 True lines Mam..It just hits hard🤞🏻❤

@omsachdev

Жыл бұрын

I would say he is one of the decent one out of the worst. Akbar and best are not appropriate in the same sentence

@omsachdev

11 ай бұрын

@@ardashirshah7786 do you really think that sati and massacre are the same thing or of equal magnitude? Slavery is prevalent even today in one form or another

@badship

11 ай бұрын

​@@omsachdevyes i think both are same.

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

@@omsachdev1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

@akshaylenin7166

6 ай бұрын

The Supreme Personality of Godhead is Lord Vishnu

hello...I'm a student studying in 8th grade. When I was writing my final exam for social, we had a question "Why is Akbar called Akbar the great? Justify your statment". What I was expected to quite is exactly what was given in our classwork or textbook. But instead, I gave an answer very similar to what you have said in this video. For saying that he is not worthy of that title, I didn't get marks for that particular question. I asked my teacher why, and she scoled me. Unforyunately this is the reality of our present day schools.

@Amitironflex

Жыл бұрын

u did a great job well done👍

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

I’m sorry you had to go through that! But education institutions are like that. They have a standard answer… unfortunately we gotta write what they want us to write to get marks.

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Hats off to you🔥🕉️🚩🚩 U r True Hindu,True Follower of Hindu Dharma🕉️🚩 Bhagwan will send people like you only to svargaloka🙏The Ones who always stand with Dharma, Truth🕉️ Bhagwan bless you alot🙏Jai Sri Ram Hari Hara🙏🕉️

@prabhukumarful

Жыл бұрын

You are the best

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

We learnt wrong history in schools. At least for this generation kids history needs to be corrected in each state books. Thanks a lot for your dedication and hard work for a better tomorrow, for a better India. Jai Hind

@rmrrao2675

Жыл бұрын

Fake history made up by Nehru and his Taliban education minister Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad!

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar* *He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

There is a humble request for all. Please try to understand that, if a person is Hundu or Muslim it doesn't matter, the matter depends on the heart and what they gave to the world. Akbar gave good as well as bad. It doesn't mean he is supreme due to his good doing and not the devil due to his bad doing. And primarily it's about a person ( a single living human being), not the religion. So there is nothing to do with Hindus and Muslims. Don't make it a religious issue. Meanwhile, Keerthi it's great, what you are doing. Even in UPSC PREPARATION, the mentor won't teach too deeply. Keep going. Great job. Love it and learn it a lot. Thanks from my whole heart. Sorry, if I unintentionally hurt anyone from above written.

I am from West Bengal. I love the way you present the true history to us.

@LionsHeart3.1.3

10 ай бұрын

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

@Abcgfsksn

3 ай бұрын

​@@LionsHeart3.1.3So basically non muslims has to pay taxes for their basic rights. Bs.

@LionsHeart3.1.3

3 ай бұрын

@@Abcgfsksn muslims too have to give taxes. why are you playing victim card?😂

Worst part is we are taught more about Babur’s lineage in our history books, than we are taught about Mauryas or Bhosales... and that is scary... I keep recommending your videos to my friends with school-going kids... hopefully it’ll help teach them OUR real history better

@anulagnabasu9854

Жыл бұрын

I am from ICSE board and we had two big chapters about the Mauryas in our book.

@KamatShivani

Жыл бұрын

@@anulagnabasu9854 I’m glad to hear it... I passed in 2001 from SSC board, and all we had was two paragraphs about Shivaji Maharaj in our history books... which by the way covered everything Mughal thoroughly

@sugunbtwj

Жыл бұрын

​@@KamatShivanishivaji is a king. Mughals is a dynasty lasted for centuries. How many pages we can write for his 15 years rule.

@sugunbtwj

Жыл бұрын

​@@KamatShivanithuglaks, kilgis, mughals.... Is a 1200 years history. How many centuries did shivaji kingdom lasted?

@indianpoliticalvideo7430

Жыл бұрын

​@@sugunbtwjdude cholas rules for 1000 years, ahom ruled for 800 plus years, vijayanagar Empire was there for almost 1000 years.. how many lineages u know? We all taught of lineage of so called great Mughals for babar to Aurangabad but doesn't even know 2-3lineage of one Empire... Don't be so blind to argue that the invdrs were not glorified in our history books🤦🤦🤦

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

@satishbhanse7454

Жыл бұрын

True... We should learn from them.. itself shows how they loved our culture

@silentbyte196

Жыл бұрын

No, it's a fallacy called survivorship bias.

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

​@@satishbhanse7454Yes😭They sacrificed their lives for our Religion🕉️ We(Current Hindus) are not even 1% as Hindu as them😭

@anulagnabasu9854

Жыл бұрын

Who exactly were Adharma spreaders?

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

​@@anulagnabasu9854Muslims☪️

Very well researched...good to see next generation is taking interest in what actually must have happened rather than believing everything showed to them ..keep it up❤

@LionsHeart3.1.3

10 ай бұрын

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

@@LionsHeart3.1.3 Don't justify Jizya, I'm a muslim too but, Jizya is pure bad, and all these conditions were not met even after receiving the tax, and also even after abolition these conditions were fulfilled.

@LionsHeart3.1.3

7 ай бұрын

@@RedRebel008 Madarchud Don't talk about what u don't know. Stop sucking liber@l d!cks. Jizya is justified 100%. U pay tax to hindutva govt and u Won't question their corruption but when Islam says ur tax will be used to protect u and would be returned if we Don't protect u. How is that bad? And by saying Jizya is bad u have becomea definite kafir. Because law of Allah can't be and never be wrong and by saying law of Allah is bad u have become kafir.

Plzz tell me what is your source ... I mean how did u know all this .. In books even in google evruthng written falsely ....

The same holds True for Ashoka the Great. He is portrayed as a monk after he converted to Buddhism. Truth is he killed 1000s in Ajivakam religion after turning into Buddhism. Every the Great has the worst side in them, be it Gandhi to now Modi

@priyadharsanmarimurugan8768

Жыл бұрын

All kings will do this sir.. but the point is If she talks about all such kings from Shivaji, dhananandh to European kings and Arabic origin kings ... it would be much better... Learning pros and cons of all kings in history is important ..not only the cons done by foreign invaded kings

@aranimallick1804

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely!

@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz

11 ай бұрын

Lol 😂 ashoka was Buddhist before killing anyone. Know the real history stop justifying one action of horror with another

@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz

11 ай бұрын

​@@aranimallick1804lol your islamic ppl are danger to humanity

@vvrlive5

11 ай бұрын

Dude it's already mentioned in 6th standard text books. He converted to Buddhism after Kalinga war.

Damn, these videos are eye openers. Shame on every who calls these invaders great! Great work ma'am!

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼

@subhadeepmandal2221

Жыл бұрын

​​@@KeerthihistoryI really got bemused where from u assess this kind of political views on historical aspects. 1. Muslim marriages were never been any ceremony. Unlike Hindu marriage, which is considered to be building a Caste - Gotra relationship between two families -- there by they conduct lots of pre nuptial rituals like feuneral of ancestors -- Tarpana, Shraddha, then Pooja of the clan deity , Pooja of land ( vastu), Pooja of main Hindu gods -- Lord Vishnu etc etc -- so it had been elaborate customs -- Muslim marriages are just contract between 2 person -- a legal formality only. All the extravaganza that we observe now a days around a Muslim marriage, had actually rooted to the family's caste/ clan roots , infact often being severely criticised by ulemas as anti - Islamic. So it was quite obvious that none of Akbar's marriages ( even with Turk or Ujbek ladies) too were never ceremony or worthy of being mentioned. 2. In those age , accessibility to imperial Harem for any man other than emperor himself was practically impossible and a capital punishment for the violator. Hence the emperor's concubines were always been very very private. Turks and Timurids have strict customs to entirely separate their ladies from any public & state affairs or interference. So it was obvious the empress ( Malika - e - Hindustan) was just a honorary title to get all the best privileges within Harem -- like best of foods, ornaments, slaves and maids, best of the chembers, medicines , health care etc. But beyond that they were sanned from any state affair. Hence the courtiers could not write about her. In fact if they would shown any interest about the empress , they would have put their own lives into dangers. This customs was not exclusive to Turks or Timurids. Even for Hindu king's concubines too used to be put under equal restrictions in those days. It was completely unfair to expect an mediaeval empire to behave like a modern day's liberal woke guy.

@sumayyashameer4153

Жыл бұрын

​@@subhadeepmandal2221❤

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

​@@subhadeepmandal2221You are suffering from Hinduph0bia and Muslimania, Ji ha di sm. Visit a good doctor

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

​@@subhadeepmandal2221No matter how hard you try, u can't change the Truth. Now cry hard ji ha di

KEERTHI, YOU ROCK. SO ARTICULATED EXPLANATION. SO SIMPLE & LUCID. YOU GIVE THIS GENERATION, A CHANCE TO PUT THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE, RATHER THAN ROTE THE EXTRACTS HANDED DOWN GENERATIONS.

It seems all we learnt in history is wrong, even in movies also they portrayed very great about Akbar, thanks to you dear Keerthi for bringing out this video😊😊 😊😊😊❤❤

@battlerushiromiya651

Жыл бұрын

She proved nothing though, none of these actions are even remotely different from what even Indian kings who she looks upto did. We dont know much about their wives, many of them also tried to glorify their own GOds and frankly all of them used harsh violence against their enemies. She is reaching.

@LionsHeart3.1.3

10 ай бұрын

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

@hriday1341

8 ай бұрын

​@@LionsHeart3.1.3imagine you have to pay jizya to aurungzeb that he will be using against marathas . I don't think anyone will be willing to finance their own destruction .

@LionsHeart3.1.3

8 ай бұрын

@@hriday1341 How is saving India by slaying parathas a bad thing? Every proud Indian would support Mughals becaus ethey destroyed parataha culture, sathi prata, r@pe culture etc. Cope hard guvarputtars anti-indians😂

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

0:38 Should we be more critical about it just because he was an invader? Or is it because he is a human being like everyone else and is bound to have faults? Shouldn't history be critical and unbiased not depending on whether the person is an invader or not? 6:48 You earlier made a video about Dara Shikoh. In it you mentioned Majma ul Bahrain right? In that book Dara Shikoh states that the basis of hinduism is actually monotheism and he refers to the Rig Veda as his source. Also, Baba Lal Bairagi states this. The Brahmo Samaj is based on monotheism as well. Dara Shikoh compares Hiranyagarbha with Allah. Maybe, the same case has taken place here. 5:44 I have read somewhere that Mirza Aziz Kokaltash had joined Din-i-ilahi after he faced discrimination in Mecca. I can be wrong about this. 8:29 He plundered cities that he conquered right? Many rulers of Ancient India had followed the policy of conquest and expansion. Invader or not, he was the emperor of India, right? Where would the plundered wealth go except India? He was not perfect and of course, not a holy saint. He was a ruler, a politician. He was born and supposed to be one. Sometimes moral values and politics don't go together. Now, has this got anything to do with him being an invader?

@battlerushiromiya651

Жыл бұрын

I think many people here and she herslef, have made up their minds by looking at Akbars birth religion, it does not matter how different his kingship was from Islamic or even Timurid models or how much his actions are similar to other Indians kings that these may hold dearly. Their opinions of him are made up due to Akbars birth religion.

@anulagnabasu9854

Жыл бұрын

​@@battlerushiromiya651Maybe or maybe not. But what do you think about the second point of my comment? Can you please tell me? I am actually a child. I study in class 8.

@battlerushiromiya651

Жыл бұрын

@@anulagnabasu9854 I am not really familiar with Dara Shikoh. You can read about Dara Shikoh in 'Dara Shikoh:Life and works' by Bikram Jit Hasrat

@anulagnabasu9854

Жыл бұрын

​@@battlerushiromiya651Thank you 😊

History means as it is.. you are a true historian

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@gulnaazshaikh2769

9 ай бұрын

😂😂

Wow! Loved this analysis! You just earned a new subscriber ❤ Keep going!

I have been waiting for this content sis,bcoz of you I got interest in history,respect for my culture and embracing my culture 😊😊

Thank You For Telling Us Reality About "Akbar The Great"

@Sanskritam16

Жыл бұрын

Akbar was a mleccha . Don’t you see mleccha mixed kids who are product of Mughals , making fun of South Indian, why because we are brown. So ignore them

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Whats the source of the information in video ???

After watching the video "My Mother Came Upon," I can proudly say that I sat through the entire duration. Despite my mother's limited understanding of English, primarily being a Punjabi speaker, she also dedicated her time to watch it. However, due to the accent utilized in the video, she encountered difficulties in comprehending the content. Consequently, I took it upon myself to narrate the entire video to her, and we both derived immense enjoyment from the experience!👍😌

@LionsHeart3.1.3

10 ай бұрын

Benefit of jizya(protection tax) : 1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war. 2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land. 3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion. 4. Muslims will protect his property. 5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya) 6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war. 7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.] 8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it. 9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection. 10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims. And more and more

Thanks for giving everyone a new way to think about history and to make it interesting for everyone And pls make a video on kittur rani chennamma

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

On it already!!!

@karthik8759

Жыл бұрын

@@Keerthihistory thanks for your reply

This seems to be an unbiased analysis. Well done.

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@choudhurycompetitivehub1017

Жыл бұрын

@@Keerthihistory read little bit and do full study in your so many vedios many facts are not accurate if teaching history teach in a better way not like WhatsApp University

@MrNobody-op6sc

Жыл бұрын

@@choudhurycompetitivehub1017 from Rahul Gandhi National University of Propaganda

@jennison316

11 ай бұрын

​@@KeerthihistoryPlz waiting for the negative side of Modi ji 🎉😊 Plz reply to my comments to as u reply to ur aganda comments Am waiting For both

@shemeemshafeeque851

11 ай бұрын

​@@choudhurycompetitivehub1017yes exactly said . Keethi mostly comes with biased opinions about history ..keerthi dnt be prejudiced while explaining the history , you are pushing and dividing the communities to chasm. Whatever the centuries old history does not do any good to the current civilization. You must keep yourself from explaining the history in such a way that instigates the communities ...

I love how every hindu nationalist things that hindu rulers are good and all non Hindu/islamic ruler are bad I wish history was this simple

@javedsheikh4141

5 ай бұрын

Yeah this is what andhbhakti is like

@shishirbobate2846

3 ай бұрын

One of the rare rational comments.

@Abcgfsksn

3 ай бұрын

But when you look at Gaza, you guys clearly knew who are good and who are bad. Then history was so simple?

@ty814

2 ай бұрын

@@Abcgfsksn Yes Israelis are bad and carrying out their cruel deeds in the name of security. They are not fighting but killing innocents. History is this much complicated. Once victims are now showing that they a were anything but a victim. FYI:I don't need your opinion though cause it would be biased in favor of Israel for no reason.

@whyareyoulookingformynamehuh

2 ай бұрын

Finnaly

Hats off to you and your efforts. Till day we are all studying history in weong manner and incorrectly 😢. I wish your videos could reach each nook and corner of our country so that atleast few of us will be aware of our real history 😢

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar* *He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*

@agniswar3

Жыл бұрын

Akbar the terrible?

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

​@@agniswar3Yes ofc. Akbar the evil, the Asura, The Monster, The Rakshas

@rahu12767

11 ай бұрын

How many wife rana pratap had just answer the question?? 11

@TypicalIndian1981

10 ай бұрын

@@rahu12767having multiple wives isn’t a crime he didn’t marry to satisfy his lust like Akbar who had unnecessary 500 wives instead he married 11 woman to have multiple children and heirs because he was already fighting with Akbar if he died there would be no one to save Rajputs from Akbar that’s why

@rahu12767

10 ай бұрын

@@TypicalIndian1981 marriage for satisfy sex or not

Kudos, Keerthi for your passionate and critical analyses of distortions of Indian history. Keep posting well-researched videos. Appreciate your effort.

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Madam any reference for what you saying in this video

Question here from where you got the informations

I can't imagine how much effort you put into thie detailed research. Man, how I wish I could live with you to listen so many historical things and intake knowledge. Thanks for this video!

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Trust me, I talk history to none of my family members!

@krishnabhojne

Жыл бұрын

@@Keerthihistory Oh man.... I thought you must be. As I keep talking with my family members 😀

@justkcworld4796

Жыл бұрын

​@@Keerthihistoryi know they are not interested in your lecture 😂 joking and the fact about akbar is right may be 'the great' title dosent deserve him but he was one the greatest king in mughals and Muslims if that era ashoka was also selfish before kalinga war every king is a invaders until his intentions and action don't harm peoples in the kingdom....

@Bulletshyri

10 ай бұрын

@@Keerthihistorymake some videos in dark side of Ashoke , Prithviraj chuhan , shiva ji how he stopped the hajj pilgrims , yup u cant make and have no dare to make videos on this coz u too know u will loose all your WhatsApp university followers, well be happy ,create whatever u want to create 😂🥱, Savidhan me tou Akber the great aj b hai or hamesha rahega 🥱🔥😎

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

thank you for telling our true history without any bias ❤️ I have been following you so long and I wish to say this, you've improved your English considerably ❤️

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

@abhinavmaharaj4804

Жыл бұрын

😂😂 without bias 😂😂😂

Hi keerthi sisto, Can u make a video on saraswati river present in North india, but y no textbook is thought about it in our schooling...

Hello Keerthi can you please provide references link also in description? i am a great fan of you but my friends need that?Your efforts are really appreciated ❤❤

You are doing great job didi..keep it up...jai hind jai bharat🔥

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

My interest towards history is going on increasing only because of ur valuable information.. Thanks a lot keerti Akka ♥️

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Madam. Tell me the Manipur history please.. PM is still missing.. Why US and France visit. Tell that history also.

Aham rudre bhirvasu bhischaramyaham adviteyi rutavishwa devaih Aham mitravarunobha bibharmyaham indragni aham ashwinobhah 6:06-6:09 Find any similarity with the above text? 6:50 What can we find in the above text or in the Gayatri Mantra?

Due to such serials and movies people forgot about his dark side 😑. They believed that he was the geart empiror. I hope they will realise the reality from this video. Great job didi 🥰👍

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

@battlerushiromiya651

Жыл бұрын

If you think this is bad, most Indian kings have also done the same things as Akbar had. The invasion of Cholas to Sri Lanka also led to violence against civilians, even the Marathas are remembered in bengal for the pluinder their mercenaries did. Moreover than that, Indian kings have always glorified their own Gods, with the help of the priestly caste, nothing new here. if you think these things dont make Great, then neither are most Indian kings.

@thamizhansameer6334

Жыл бұрын

​@@JaiSriRam119டேய் சங்கி..பயலே ...தமிழன்டா❤

Mannn Keerthi☺️☺️☺️☺️😍😍...I came here to make fun of your accent and the way you speak. But it's been five hours and I'm hooked to each and every one of your vedios . Massive respect . You earned this follower!!!

@thomasthomasphilp4393

Жыл бұрын

Most Indians have an influence of native language with accent. Scottish have an accent

I came to know about your channel yesterday. Simply brillant, the work the effort and the authenticity is top noach. Channel like your, Dhruv, Soch by Mohak Mangal, Nitish Rajput and SeeKen Jigyaasa are soo important to today's society. Really proude of you didi.😁😁

This video is really needed Thanks for telling the history

Thank you for lighting on Akbar's dark side 🙏🙏

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*

I am a non-Indian muslim and I had read a little bit about Akbar. Like his made-up religion of din-e-ilahi. I honestly thought that this religion was just a mix of Islam and Hinduism in scriptures. However, I did not know this much details about his murder of 30,000 innocent civilians. This video has opened my eyes. Thank you

@babutara7374

5 ай бұрын

Yes after the war of Chittor, he ordered the killing of 30k innocent common people living in that Fort city.

@Myname-wh5yu

3 ай бұрын

Every ruler did acts like that. How do you think an empire was established without killing civilians

Best out of the worst . I love your last sentence😂

Can u please provide us your source of history 🙏

👏👏👏 Good job, Keep it forward 👍

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, I will❤

More power to you girl❤

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

Madam one doubt, the governer general who don't have left hand?

Being a muslim I can say rajput and mughal women drew him crazy so he was not a true muslim or not a true hindu

6:50 Considering you as true history reseachers, you should already know the Hinduism evoled from a religion now we called vedantic religion where there is mention of one god but slowly it transformed polytheism

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

Damn, I did not know that, I'm gonna steal this, and BTW if she was a historian don't you think she'd be challenging the current theories instead of making youtube videos, she herself doesn't believe what she says.

Make a full detailed video about Vijayanagara empire and shri krishna devaraya,because even Mughal king Babur mentioned Shri Krishna devaraya in his autobiography and said that he would not dare to attack southern part of bharat because of the presence of Shri Krishna devaraya ,he was undefeated his whole life.....but school/college history books don't teach much about them...

@bharatmahaan2991

2 ай бұрын

Yes...just 2 or 3 sentences are allotted to the great king...

SOURCES PLS...

Last line best line "the best out of the worst"

U r my guru ❤ blessed to have such channels

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

Nothing but facts 🔥

Madam our history sir taught that Kachwaha princess (her name is Harkabhai) the Princess of Fort Amer, which near by Jaipur City.. please check it once..they are many sources ... In movies her name was portrayed as jodhabai which was rubbish.. One of the wives of Jahangir was princess of jodhpur...

Hello Ma'am, 1 mun is 20kgs if I am not wrong or atleast the place where I live it is considered as 20Kg.

Hy didi im a student of BA first year history really surprisingly the facts which We were taught in school was all a lie after joining college i came to know many True facts and the story behind them and like a great guide who guiding us in every step i found you as a best guide for a history student like me thanks a lot didi you are such a brilliant lady❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Jai hind

@2scent

Жыл бұрын

Good evening, everyone

@Preeth2603

Жыл бұрын

Vandemataram 🇮🇳 🇮🇳

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭* And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country" *In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭* This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

Islam = Adharma Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55

Lot of facts gone unnoticed unearthed by you. Gr8.

Great in history means who creates a big empire defeating many kings , and lives until a natural death .like Alexnder , sultan Suleman...

Why are we not focussing more effort on making underrated kings who were great, brave & just? And focus on bringing down people who are considered great (real or not)... because that is what trends now and sad Keerthi is following it. Keerthi consider a series of episodes on Chola Vs Pandyas enmity history... and how Chola lineage is not traceable now... There are so many kings in Dravidian kingdoms in the last 1000 years, but we are not hearing enough about them.

@ishrakalvi4446

2 ай бұрын

She Won't get views unless she spreads lies about muslim empires😂

Madam, You are Great..... Very Clearly, Authoritatively You are Explaining the Real History... And It wd be Proper for the Central Govt to Have You as a Member in the CBSC syllabus Committee.... ThankYou....

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

First of all its CBSE and not CBSC 1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Mam, You are doing a fabulous job. Plz make a video on Bindusar as we have no knowledge about him and also about Satavahana kings like Gautmiputra Satkarni n others

It is really a nice study All such hidden points for past 75years should be added to our school text books with proper references to the text book committee.

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

They are in the books, the sources too. Some of it is not in the book well because its false here's the proof - 1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Pandit Nehru was the worst PM of Bharat, because he himself was not Bhartiya, he was muslim. Nehru has written Shivaji Maharaj was decoit.this is what his knowledge was. I don't count him as PM.

@shikharyadav9637

Ай бұрын

Tere maine she unko Kiya farak pardta hai 😂 it's like scientist removing Pluto from the planet list lol 🤡 like Pluto even care about them

love your works!!!

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼

Great going keerthi. Keep it up

Keerthi, I would like to see your invaluable research and analysis to reach outside KZread. Do you have intention of publishing books for general awareness and text books for schools and colleges? I would very much like to donate for the cause as much I can.

Thank you for making this video

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

The essence of upanishads is not polytheism. It is actually oneness. In fact , the main essence of it is "aham brahmasmi" , that one individual can realize Brahman , the universal consciousness. In that aspect, what Akbar was trying to do is not too much different from the text. Although, the ego is the one driving that which is completely against the upanishads.

@battlerushiromiya651

Жыл бұрын

Bro, most Hindu kings also created texts with the help of priestly caste to furhter their own dominance, Akbar is not alone in this regard at all. Are you ready to judge them as well?

can u mnetion your sorce of information

I really appreciate your hard work and study material 😊

Namaste 🙏 Keerthi

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

Good explanation 👏

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

Please continue your ork Keerthi. India really thrive for reality and facts.which are still unknown to most

Such a great video and it was very enlightening ❤

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Keerthi, you're very articulate with excellent communication skills. Love from all of us in Australia 🇦🇺

I hope u will continue this work and educate Indian youth for longer time. Hope all success to u Keerthy 😍

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

@@Keerthihistory mam i'd like to add the following - 1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Very good compilation of the facts. I always wanted to know about this. Can you also through light on the stories of Akbar visiting Jwala Devi. Also his stories with Taansen, Bhakt Haridas Ji and Raja birbal. Because now I can't rely on the text we have studied. All the best for your future videos👍🏻

@RedRebel008

7 ай бұрын

1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well. 1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. 2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen. 3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly. 3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed. 3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed 4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas. 5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god. 7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.

Oh my God the Janeu point just gave me goosebumps

Jai Maharana Pratap 🙏

You can be appointed for preparing the text books for schools across India 👏👏👌

@sonar451

6 ай бұрын

Yup, She will write Rama as historical figure and Gandhi as mythological.

@akshaylenin7166

6 ай бұрын

​@@sonar451Keerthi Akka will write about the dark reality of Gandhi and Khangress Party

Please do share your references in the description so that people can verify

@Christianhebronsongs76

11 ай бұрын

She don't know references.she is main work humiliation of other religions

Its not hard to see why contradiction exists in his reign. You see, he himself appears like a secular person, but lets the blame fall on his ministers to appear clean himself.

"He's definitely the best out of the worst". Yup that's the perfect description you could give him.

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

This tells everything about M us lim Community. Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴

@JaiSriRam119

Жыл бұрын

This tells everything about M us lims. Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴

Awesome video

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

Appreciate for coming forward and making such bold history recall. Upanishad helped in Copy & Paste which started long ago. Great... Keep rocking !!!! History books might need correction ???

Once again bursting myths. Nice

@Keerthihistory

Жыл бұрын

😇❤️🙏🏼

just one thing to point out ... that rajput princess name was harka bai,daughter of raja bharmal,married on 6th feb 1562 ... I know this coz i am from Rajasthan..

I am glad there are still some people in your audience who do not believe everything blindly. Stop spreading hate.

Beautiful explanation....I keep showing all your videos to my eigh class daughter Thank 3

Your research and everything is fine. But where are you getting all these points in most of your videos that always supports Hinduism and opposes Islam. Like every single video in which religion is involved and there's no secularistic point of view, even though you would have studied in your history book as "India is a secular country". In your every video, you support only Hinduism and indirectly oppose Congress leaders, non Hindu leaders or rulers. And just because majority of our population is Hindu, they also believe whatever you say without knowing your intention. Think on your own guys. What she says is just a perspective. Hinduism or Islam is just a religion. This will bring hatred towards other religions.

@NativeVsColonial

10 ай бұрын

Let me find you the secular book, upon which the major world terror outfits are based: Qu'ran 47:4 “So when you meet those who disbelieve in Allah, strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.”

@samarthpawar1504

4 ай бұрын

It's not secularism...what you want is escapism😂😂😂 go to some other channel for that, you won't get it on a history channel which is talking about facts... Not self concocted lies and fantasies..if you can't handle the fact that hindus were killed by muslims rulers then it is your fault.

Very careful analysis. Good job

As a history teacher, I found this video to be a very useful tool for my students. We're studying the Mughal Empire as a part of our Eastern Civilizations course and I used your video to demonstrate the issue of studying "Great people of history" and how bias can seep into our textbooks and lessons. Thank you so much for your wonderful work!

I wouldn't even say Akbar is the 'best out of the worst' when it comes to Islamic rulers in Bharat. His older brother, Dara Shikoh, was leagues better (still an invader and part of the genocidal bloodthirsty Mughal barbarians, of course); he translated 52 chapters of an upanishad, and the Bhagavad Gita into Persian. He actually had decent conversations with a Sanatani guru, and was hated by the Mughals and the Mughal court, hated by muslims, but at least somewhat liked by Sanatani's. I don't know the full story. But in the end, his head was chopped off and paraded around the city during the war of succession, to Akbar's utter glee. Akbar was an evil man, and no amount of narcissm, self aggrandising, attempting to culturally degrade and poison Sanatana Dharma to convert Hindus, or religious pandering will override the massive genocides and boiling hatred he had for us. There can be nuance in conversation about the facts, but it doesn't change the genocide of 30000 Hindus and murder of Brahmanas. There is only 108 legitimate upanishads. Allopanishad is a disgusting and pitiful attempt to poison our dharma and inject Abrahamic religion into Dharmic parampara. There is no 109th upanishad or fifth veda. That's all. Namaskaram. Thank you so much for this video, Keerthi. I was getting really curiosu about Akbar after hearing of his brother, Dara Shikoh, and wondering what Akbar was like. Thank you for showering your knowledge upon us. May Saraswati bless you 🙏

@karuthedathprasanth4266

Жыл бұрын

Dara shikoh was brother of Aurangazeb, not Akbar

@Deepak_Dhakad

Жыл бұрын

Dara Shikoh was beloved by everyone. His father wanted to make him next Badshah I hind. Shehzadi Jahanara also sided with him. He is best among all mughals, decent prince of india. Akbar was good in administration.

@battlerushiromiya651

Жыл бұрын

Dara Shikoh was Akbars great grandson, not his brother. You are confusing him with Aurangzeb. Maybe think before you write anything.

If Akbar is still alive would you ever dare to speak all this ?

@LapisPhilosophorum222

Жыл бұрын

Well, we live in a democracy now. Not an autocracy. If, hypothetically he comes back to life today, *he would be a commoner. Who is penniless.* So yeah. Hope you understood.

I appreciate your analysis about history the way u taken great challenge will know the new generation history truth some where….all best 👍