No video

Using AI to generate PixInsight pixelmath

In this video I explore using AI (chatGPT) to create pixelmath expressions for PixInsight! Come check it out. Very cool!
Join other VisibleDark supporters on Patreon here: bit.ly/3v5dEaB
Help support the channel! If buying astro gear use these links below and I'll receive a small commission at no cost to you:
OPT (USA): bit.ly/37ZCnzv
High Point Scientific (USA): bit.ly/3CMPKEy
Ontario Telescope (Canada): bit.ly/3cncCjE
All-Star Telescope (Canada) bit.ly/3PZFyxI
New to Pixinsight image processing? Get in touch! I provide one-on-one lessons via Zoom.
Join me on:
Twitter: / visibledark_
TikTok: / visibledark
Thanks for watching! Clear skies!

Пікірлер: 37

  • @zyban99
    @zyban99 Жыл бұрын

    First time I’ve seen a KZread video about chat gpt that’s actually interesting

  • @simonpepper5053
    @simonpepper5053 Жыл бұрын

    First time I have heard of Chatgpt this is amazing!

  • @astrobri
    @astrobri Жыл бұрын

    Very interesting, Since watching your video I have sat and played and had some quite interesting results. I have created or asked Gpt to create some very strange pixel math and yes it does what you ask it to. Thanks for directing me to this, I knew aboot it but thought I would never have a use for it but apparently I do 👍

  • @enriqueboeneker
    @enriqueboeneker Жыл бұрын

    Isn't this amazing and terrifying at the same time?! Thanks for sharing, Shawn!

  • @normhughes9777
    @normhughes9777 Жыл бұрын

    interesting video. I see a great tool here for people who are trying to learn pixel math. nice work Shawn. thanks for demonstrating this.

  • @tonycooper0
    @tonycooper0 Жыл бұрын

    It's not "learning." It gives a different answer each time because it generates text one word at a time and everytime it wants a new word it chooses one based on a probability distribution.

  • @AstroCloudGenerator
    @AstroCloudGenerator Жыл бұрын

    Thanks Shawn, interesting for sure. But surely ChatGBT is not using intelligence to “write” pixinsight expressions but is instead carrying out a very clever search of all the documents on the internet which discuss the question you asked. Then using statistical analysis returns the most commonly found examples wrapped up in non copyright infringing text. Don’t get me wrong if the expressions work and it saves time, why not. It would be interesting to see what would happen if you asked it a pixinsight question that had been answered incorrectly somewhere on the internet once or twice whether it would just return us the incorrect information rather than the less quoted correct answer. I wonder whether in the future we might see court cases arguing that ChatGBT or the like is passing off work done by others as it’s own.

  • @frankbutler3575
    @frankbutler3575 Жыл бұрын

    Amazing, thanks for sharing.

  • @Northof40cdn
    @Northof40cdn Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for sharing Shawn

  • @VisibledarkAstro

    @VisibledarkAstro

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you! 😊

  • @haroldlocke7991
    @haroldlocke7991 Жыл бұрын

    It is awesome, thanks for sharing

  • @zara8289
    @zara8289 Жыл бұрын

    This is pretty cool, I have to admit I've been using chat GPT and it didn't even occur to me to try this. I found even if it messes things up just the overall experience. It's a great one for learning. I've used it in other things that I do with similar results and even though it messes up and doesn't get things right, sometimes it still ends up opening my eyes to new possibilities and things that I didn't consider.

  • @astro-canuck
    @astro-canuck Жыл бұрын

    When creating the prompts, consider adding a catalog reference. This may enable the AI to manage target specific pixel math.

  • @VisibledarkAstro

    @VisibledarkAstro

    Жыл бұрын

    Thanks. What is a catalog reference? Not familiar with that.

  • @astro-canuck

    @astro-canuck

    Жыл бұрын

    @@VisibledarkAstro use the messier or equivalent catalogs. I was thinking that you may be able to engage the AI to "for messier 51" create pixel math for "

  • @VisibledarkAstro

    @VisibledarkAstro

    Жыл бұрын

    @@astro-canuck oh OK. I see what you mean. 😏

  • @markwood1660
    @markwood1660 Жыл бұрын

    nicely done shawn, interesting to see even PI can be use the ChatGPT bandwagon :)

  • @gregerianne3880
    @gregerianne3880 Жыл бұрын

    Wow, that really is pretty cool! Being new to PixInsight, I might use it as a user's guide when I have specific questions. Curious to try it out.

  • @gregerianne3880

    @gregerianne3880

    Жыл бұрын

    I tried asking specific questions about PixInsight like when to use this or that process and got some pretty good answers! I was impressed, and it never seems to get tired of answering my clueless questions. 😀 I did ask if it was able to 'look' at an astro-image and suggest how it might be improved but, alas, I don't think it can 'see' yet. It just gave me some general suggestions. Won't that be something. Might take all the fun and challenge out of it, though.

  • @peteproulx
    @peteproulx Жыл бұрын

    Very cool!

  • @ruwanthiperera2366
    @ruwanthiperera23665 ай бұрын

    Trying to understand the IDE that you are using here. Could you please what are the tools you use here? Can you pls help a road map of tools or documentation to lean this?

  • @brianastrodoc2886
    @brianastrodoc2886 Жыл бұрын

    This is truly amazing, sci-fi coming true. Eventually AI will process everything from start to finish. The human element will be eliminated. I think I will prefer my human control, errors and all. 😂

  • @craigwallace6601
    @craigwallace6601 Жыл бұрын

    It won't be long before we're saying "hey chatGPT, here's all my subs and calibration frames, give me a pleasing image..."

  • @briansnell9179
    @briansnell9179 Жыл бұрын

    Hi Shawn, when I add stars to a starless image in Pixelmath, I just use a single RGB/K image expression "Starless_image + Just_stars_image". Is there a problem with this method, as it seems to work OK?

  • @VisibledarkAstro

    @VisibledarkAstro

    Жыл бұрын

    It works but the unscreen or rescreen methods help preserve the star cores better.

  • @briansnell9179

    @briansnell9179

    Жыл бұрын

    Oh OK, I will give it a try. Thanks for the reply Shawn.

  • @danjensen9425
    @danjensen9425 Жыл бұрын

    Crazy

  • @VisibledarkAstro

    @VisibledarkAstro

    Жыл бұрын

    I know eh!

  • @thepuffybird
    @thepuffybird Жыл бұрын

    First! Cool vid. Thanks

  • @pemongillo
    @pemongillo Жыл бұрын

    I went to the iphone app store and there a many of these. which one are you using?

  • @pemongillo

    @pemongillo

    Жыл бұрын

    Never mind. Sorted it out

  • @micnek
    @micnek Жыл бұрын

    Thx for a Superb channel, Shawn - I learned a lot from you and hope to learn even more. I have a question regarding editing stars (struggled a lot with this issue), namely how to get rid of too many stars? I tried various options, eg. "star shrink", manual stretch, masking etc. In ideal world, it would be an automated script eliminating certain % of faintest stars in an image, say "remove 50% faintest stars", or 30% or whatever. Does this thing exist? Anyone whats to write such a script? I would gladly pay for it! :) :)

  • @KMuffel
    @KMuffel Жыл бұрын

    Most of the times i hade this error: PixelMath: Processing view: M81_RGB_GraXpert *** Error: Unknown metasymbol identifier: ($T - $B_MEDIAN) / ($T_MAXIMUM - $B_MEDIAN) ~~~~~~^

  • @Astro-George
    @Astro-George Жыл бұрын

    Just don't ask how it feels.......

  • @philipjedar4065
    @philipjedar4065 Жыл бұрын

    It's GPT not GTP 😋

  • @VisibledarkAstro

    @VisibledarkAstro

    Жыл бұрын

    Yes thanks. You called out my dyslexia. GPT just wouldn't roll of my tongue.