That nigga F Lee Bailey a savage

@LordCorlys

8 жыл бұрын

Lmao RNS. That whole dream team line-up was savage AF cuh.

@justinz1619

7 жыл бұрын

Hell yea son, dat nigga be trippin gott. If I want me a candy bar, I take me a candy bar, fuck payin. I'm a nigga!

@tyv6se

6 жыл бұрын

Super true ass savage lol

@schooltrashers

3 ай бұрын

Frick yeah he was.

@jamesmatthews3964

3 ай бұрын

Yeh and he probly used the term all the time fucking F Lee Bailey

Mark Furhman loss the whole case for them

@20alphabet

3 жыл бұрын

They had no case without the planted blood evidence.

@wadeobryan4175

3 жыл бұрын

@@20alphabet magically got oj blood collected before the samples of dna test magically planted all over oj estate. While unsure if he had a rock solid alibi its really hard to frame celebs since its real easy for them to get a public alibi. Also they sure wanted to frame the guy who kissed their asses threw them pool parties while he was running around beating the shit out of Nicole and lapd was letting him off with community service unfinished. Oh I bet the lapd killed nicole and Ron too just to frame the man makes total sense. People that believe oj did it has incresed to over 80% im sure your not one of the slow brained 20%holding out for the washed up football star.

@20alphabet

3 жыл бұрын

@@wadeobryan4175 All "blood evidence" found at the crime scene was equivalent to the amount missing from the sample taken from OJ. It also all had the preservative EDTA in it. Inform yourself.

@bosto23

3 жыл бұрын

No, The biased jury ruined this

@johnd1843

3 жыл бұрын

Ruined a great cop.

"all of them?" was the head shot

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

Sure was.........it was beautiful to watch.

“You mean if u’ve called someone a n****r you’ve forgotten it?” That was such a masterful way to lock in Mark F after he tried to sidestep the original question.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

The only downside was that it made a mockery of the justice system, because that word had nothing to do with the case. If Fuhrman had given different versions of where he found the glove, then it would be reasonable doubt. But since Cochran and Bailey couldn't do shit, they attacked him on a personal level. Recently, Amber Heard's lawyer did the same to a Disney executive, harassed him over proof that Johnny Depp was going to be in a sixth PotC at all. Totally irrelevant to the case itself. Thats what defence lawyers do when they can't cast reasonable doubt, so they clutch at straws to try and fool the jury, hoping that they're a bunch of dummies. It worked in the OJ case, but lets hope it doesn't work in the Depp case.

@tinabaygboe6879

2 жыл бұрын

That word was significant in this case because it showed that Furhman was a flaming racist and if he used that word on a everyday basis as a police officer 👮‍♀️ (movie script or not bc his actions as a police officer was also suspect towards black ppl) then it wasn’t too far fetched for one to think that he’d frame a black person (especially a black man that married a white woman) by planting evidence (the glove). Furhman wasn’t suppose to be there that night but because he already had a vendetta against OJ he went to to make sure that OJ would be guilty.

@jektonoporkins5025

2 жыл бұрын

It's called knowing your jury. "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus." That means "False in one thing, false about everything." Out of 12 jurors on that case, 9 of them were black. If they see a white cop (who let's be honest, they're already predisposed to dislike) affirm several times that he's never used the n-word in the past 10 years but then evidence comes to light that he had used it not just once but several times in the past 10 years, his testimony is absolute garbage to those black jurors.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@tinabaygboe6879 Racist and jackass logic at its finest 🦍🐵🦧🐴 Thats the same as saying if OJ and Cochran were white and Nicole, Ron and Fuhrman were black and Fuhrman had talked on tape about "framing white motherfuckers" for a fictional screenplay, then the not guilty verdict would still be valid. If race were an issue in murder cases, then there would be no blacks in prison 🤣🤣🤣 Jackass Double-edged sword 😘 Now go back to the planet where your kind worship the General Thade memorial in Washington and the Statue of Liberty is half-buried in the sand 🦧🐵🦍

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@jektonoporkins5025 They said it was payback for Rodney King, not because they thought OJ was innocent.

He lied and blew this whole case apart... He was the albatross... Always a racist to fuck shit up.. Smh!!!

@revlo1557

8 жыл бұрын

+Kara Champion word! He totally blew that case up.

@rickflash91

8 жыл бұрын

+Jose Arevalo (Revlo) no he didn't they all blew for thinking he killed her and lacking any evidence smh but they also blew for being races by thinking cuz he black that he did it. if anyone of you had sence you'll look how they was killed and know that a black person can't pull mutilation Jack the Ripper style killing like that it's only a white person who do s*** like that a black man would of shot her and still felt bad cuz he loved here but you would have to hate to kill in the way those 2 was murdered but remember she was very sexual active with many men and she did lost of coke and anyone of these love sick junkies could of killed her smh

@soulcology

8 жыл бұрын

+PietreADI And don't you ever forget it!!! I wouldn't want to be anyone else😘😘😘.. OJ should have been found guilty but its people like Furhman who mucked it up.. I know Nicole is in heaven where she belongs. Hateful people will go to hell including murderers like OJ.. Have a great day..😜

@soulcology

8 жыл бұрын

+PietreADI Furhman blew his own credibility... Sabotaging the whole case.. His lie left room for reasonable doubt. And he'll live with that fact for the rest of his life.. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@twallyd

8 жыл бұрын

+PietreADI of course words are action he would plant evidence not plants

How many here cuz of FX show

@merrittlawless2591

8 жыл бұрын

just got done watching last episode.

@claudiomonreal8729

8 жыл бұрын

i am

@gtguy181

8 жыл бұрын

Well after last nights episode, I sure am.

@gtguy181

8 жыл бұрын

Taharkah X Go back and watch those episodes. What in the hell man.

@TheShowstopperEnt

8 жыл бұрын

+Taharkah X the first to episodes are the best ones

here coz of Episode 6, People vs OJ

@TheY2JMc

8 жыл бұрын

its taking me forever to watch it as i keep popping on here to see the actual footage! haha

@lovewindycity

7 жыл бұрын

me to

@hineighbor

7 жыл бұрын

I'm watching it now lol. Didn't even finish the episode yet but paused and wanted to check this out. Now back to the episode!

@toiletbowlearth

7 жыл бұрын

Team Evian yup

@fatallove2883

5 жыл бұрын

same

You had to be alive in the 90's to understand why people were glued to the TV and emotionally invested in this trial.

@paulrevere1479

Жыл бұрын

No one could ever get the real gist of this trial if they were not glued to the tv live as it happened. It was truly an event to behold

@tamlynn786

7 ай бұрын

My mom watched every single day and was obsessed. I, on the other, hand was a senior in high school and didn’t give a flip about it lol

@Dre0122

5 ай бұрын

I’m jealous yall got to witness this as it happened…I was 6 at the time so I was casually hearing about it, but I was too young to fully grasp what was really going on..Few years later and definitely woulda been paying attention…

@Archie583

2 ай бұрын

Well, and it also helped if you were old enough to remember OJ the football hero. He was as American as apple pie, so when this happened, everyone was all, "Wait...What?"

-- The OJ trial was over after this testimony, plain and simple.

@TDKiller415

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think there ever really was a real murder trial. Carrie Bess said that 90% of the jury had decided to let him go because of Rodney King, it was over before it began. Any real trial connected to the murders that wasn't a farce was the civil trial, because the judge did not allow anything that was not related to the crime itself, unlike Ito. That was why the defence experts admitted that they lied or made things up during the criminal trial, and the Goldmans won the civil trial, because it was a FAIR trial, not a joke or a media circus.

@63weezer

3 жыл бұрын

I posted those remarks 4yrs ago. WoW!! My position has not changed. Everyone knew Furhman was lying in real time. The prosecutors never wanted Furhman involved in any way with that trial because of his documented racist past. The defense didn’t need to prove OJs innocence. They only needed to poke holes in the prosecutions case- which they successfully did.

@TDKiller415

3 жыл бұрын

@@63weezer Well its a real shame that Fuhrman's perjury about irrelevant facts was detrimental to the prosecution, while the defence witnesses and experts like Rosa Lopez, Sylvia Guerra, John Gerdes, Lenore Walker, Henry Lee, Michael Baden and Fredrich Rieders who knowingly lied or gave false testimony in Simpson's favour in exchange for money and later admitted it were not punished at all. Legally speaking, all of them should be in prison because they committed perjury in a double homicide case. Their lies were exposed in the civil trial because judge Hiroshi Fujisaki did not allow conspiracy claims without any solid evidence to back them. For all his faults and his big mouth, Fuhrman was still just as much a victim of injustice as Nicole, Ron and the Goldman family. There's a reason why Lenore Walker testified against Simpson in the civil trial and Henry Lee later published a study to disprove the conspiracy claims, because their careers had been ruined.

@63weezer

3 жыл бұрын

Furhman’s testimony speaks for itself. He perjured himself- period. A threshold in a civil trial is lower than a criminal trial. Furhman stated under oath that he never said a particular word in the past 10 yrs. He lied. Then when asked again, under oath, he used the 5th amendment in order to save himself. This video is about THAT, nothing else. Furhman torpedoed the OJ case by his participation- period.

@TDKiller415

3 жыл бұрын

@@63weezer My point is that this specific perjury should not have impacted the outcome of the case at all because it was completely irrelevant. The defence experts I mentioned, they were the REAL perjurers. The criminal trial was won by the defence based on lies, deceptions and fraud. They just made it look as if the prosecution lost. All of those perjurers should've been more severely punished than Fuhrman.

Best line of the movie-Darden telling Clark"you only wanted a Black face for this trial, not a black voice"

@RawwRex

3 ай бұрын

He told Marcia ass don’t use Furhman 😭🤦🏾‍♂️

Funny thing is we have tapes proving that he not only has but does it on a regular basis and then some.

@teddybruscie

8 жыл бұрын

***** Yes it, does. It proves that evidence tampering could have played a role. He openly admitted to planting evidence on suspects. So who's to say he didn't plant evidence on OJ. After all the blood evidence had blood preservatives in. So most of the evidence couldn't even be taken because you couldn't tell if Furhman planted it or not. So how we trust any of the evidence if Furhman touched most it?

@teddybruscie

8 жыл бұрын

***** He's certainly not proven guilty. They had 2 other suspects they never looked into. Thry could have looked into his son and they could have looked into the Mafia at the restaurant the guy worked at that was a well know drug spot. So how is he guilty?

@teddybruscie

8 жыл бұрын

***** Ok, what does that prove? It's an irrelevant point. Everyone especially white people had a massive social pressure to believe or at least publicly state that he was guilty. So he could have said that reduce social pressure. He could have a great relationship with the police and didn't want to harm that relationship and chose to not state whether he believed he was framed or not. Who knows. But it means nothing.

@teddybruscie

8 жыл бұрын

Throwing someone in prison for a crime you can't prove he commited isnt justice. They convicted him of stealing his own shit. Who does that? People with an agenda. They set up OJ so smooth and he fell for that shit hook line and stinker.

@teddybruscie

8 жыл бұрын

***** Karma for what? He didn't kill anybody. No motive.

I like how the tv show makes an exact replica of trial almost word for word. A lot of shows and movies that are supposedly based on true events like to embellish the truth. This is almost entirely accurate.

@joewhitehead3

7 жыл бұрын

osamabad Except the show made it more dramatic in regards to the camera work & the way Lee was asking the question

@osamabad3597

7 жыл бұрын

Joe Whitehead Yeah, that's the only part that was off, but it's expected. I'm also pretty sure Shapiro was nearly as flamboyant as Travolta portrayed him.

@joewhitehead3

7 жыл бұрын

***** I'm sure he'd have to be for Travolta to act like that

@osamabad3597

7 жыл бұрын

Joe Whitehead Lol Travolta always acts that way. He wasn't playing Bob Shapiro. He was playing himself.

@m42037

3 жыл бұрын

This was on television from late June 94 to October 95, (the actual trial was nine months) I doupt a television show could put everything in 16 months

ladies and gentlemen this is the guy fox news gave a job too. AFTER this.

@knightmire

8 жыл бұрын

the same people that support donald trump. I'm not surprised

@ryang790

8 жыл бұрын

Great point my friend.

@CloroxBleachChannel

7 жыл бұрын

liberal puke

@krisdavis6813

5 жыл бұрын

@dampsalt okay racist

@TDKiller415

4 жыл бұрын

@@lulz7163 Some people actually did to cure themselves of Covid19, on Trump's advice 😅😅😅 And it actually worked.......it only cost them their lives.

I have to say, that I can't see any difference between the real Marcia Clarke and the actress playing the character on the Netflix show. The actress did a hell of a job.

@lucaurbani38

3 жыл бұрын

Darden too, amazing cast

@Reegan_Elizabeth

3 жыл бұрын

I agree

@m42037

3 жыл бұрын

This isn't a show

@lilyloud7777

2 жыл бұрын

@@m42037 it is. Ok vs people

@brandonfarr6740

2 ай бұрын

​@@m42037 yeah it was. a mini series if u wanna get technical about it but yes it was a mini series show on tv with actors portraying the characters. not hard to follow.

Man was so mad to see a black man break 2,000 yards in only 14 games…. He went and tried to frame him for murder…. 🤡🤡🤡

@applejuicejunkie316

6 ай бұрын

And marry a young white woman too. Fuhrman aka Fuhrer man was seething with jealousy.

@Shooter__Mcgavin

5 ай бұрын

😂

@invulnerabledr

3 ай бұрын

Nah He murdered his wife cause he was jealous she left him for a white man who would treat her right 🙌. Cope

@my.0224

3 ай бұрын

@@invulnerabledrwhite men treat women right like Chris Watts and Scott Peterson. Sure.🙄🙄🙄🙄

@brandonfarr6740

2 ай бұрын

@guccimane you're the clown if u think fuhrman planted the glove. THIRTEEN cops and officials arrived at bundy before fuhrman and not a one said there were two gloves at nicole's. oj was a shitty husband and father who got off of double murder because of an incompetent racially biased jury. do your homework next time and u might not look so ignorant.

Bailey dissected this fool,and set him up perfectly just where he wanted him,and then furhman fell into the trap🔥🔥🔥

Mark Fuhrman lost it for the prosecution

@williammckenzi5885

4 жыл бұрын

Not really the prosecution put together about as solid of a case as u could that’s y all America really thinks he did it u don’t get it oh was getting acquitted as soon as they got a change of venue an a all black jury they literally said a few jurors said they voted him not guilty because race so it didn’t matter what they did it firman should have just said yea when I’m stressed out I’ve said it an that would have been the end

@markanthony9975

4 жыл бұрын

@@williammckenzi5885 Prosecution blew it with Furhman but when Darden had OJ try on the gloves, big mistake "If the gloves don't fit, you must acquit"

@williammckenzi5885

4 жыл бұрын

Mark Anthony the case become about race the man murdered them I mean the prints of his 1 in a million that by itself shows who did it the chance of another murderer wearing a pair of very rare shoes through blood is enough to convict the case was about race the funny thing is oj even fooled the black jury by having his lawyers go in an put all black pictures through his house

@Clintsessentials

4 жыл бұрын

@@williammckenzi5885 yep

@m42037

3 жыл бұрын

@@williammckenzi5885 Wow ya I forgot that! Ya lot of racist blacks wanted to stick it to whitey after Rodney King trial few years prior. This is how we got today with this BLM crap etc, all this racial divide is from Rodney King and OJ! 25 years in the making

F Lee Bailey gave him numerous opportunities to come clean and be truthful. Fuhrman lied back to back to back about it. How can anyone be sure about some other parts of his testimony?

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

Because Fuhrman's use of the n-word is as relevant to the case as Fuhrman's body weight. Maybe if what happened to Nicole and Ron happens to your daughter and the killer is acquitted just because the lead detective was caught lying about something completely irrelevant to the case, you'll understand ❤❤ I pray it happens so your eyes are opened

@kamikazeblackheart3633

2 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 The detective was caught lying under oath about something he was given numerous opportunities to tell the truth on. If he, as a detective, will lie about one thing under oath completely...he would lie about other parts of the investigation. You can't trust a DETECTIVE who would lie under oath! It's definitely relevant and he sunk the case because of it.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@kamikazeblackheart3633 You obviously know nothing about law practice. A history of using racial slurs is not relevant to a murder case just because the accused is black. Thats why Ito was criticised for letting it become part of the case and why it was kept out of the civil case. If it were then every single black criminal would be acquitted of murder, rape, etc on grounds of the police using racial slurs. Thats why everyone said the trial was a circus and a sham. What was actually relevant was the defence witnesses lying under oath for money like Rosa Lopez or Sylvia Guerra about what time they saw the Bronco, or the tow tuck drivers who said there was no blood on the Bronco when there was, and when it was proven, none of them were punished, and some of the other defence experts who gave false testimony like John Gerdes, Henry Lee, Lenore Walker etc have come forward and admitted that they lied for money, while Fuhrman has apologised for using the n-word and maintained that he did not plant any evidence. Speaks volumes about the different sides. So basically, would you also accept it as relevant if OJ was white, Nicole, Ron and Fuhrman were black and one reason OJ walked was because Fuhrman lied about using the term "white motherfuckers"? If the fictional screenplay about corrupt white cops planting evidence was relevant, should Line of Duty be used as evidence to exonerate white criminals convicted by black cops just because that series has numerous black cops planting evidence on innocent whites? If your next response is more random woke SJW crap instead of an actual answer to the question, I'm muting you, because it just indicates anti-white racsim 🤡🤡

@opanpro9772

2 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 lol how do you really know if someone got away with murder or not

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@opanpro9772 He confessed in 2006, duh. He said he "obviously must have" dropped the glove there because "thats where the police found it." If that still makes him innocent, then the same applies to the men who were accused of killing Emmett Till. Skin colour don't mean shit, buddy.

Fuhrman was the only one convicted of any crime in the oj trial lol

This entire thing was the greatest tv production in a long time

Bailey reallllllly loved to say that word... Or just really wanted to pound it into the jury's heads... Probably the latter.. Or both

@1999glock

5 жыл бұрын

Just like Ana Navarro on CNN using the phrase "Shithole countries" 11 times in 1 minute when discussing president Trump.......

@stylofromthep2898

5 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@uziclippe

5 жыл бұрын

He was having fun with it. Imagine any of us be in the same shoes, granting free immunity.

@sharonjones2775

4 жыл бұрын

Matt Anderson Both

@basicindiebro

4 жыл бұрын

most likely both but the way Nathan Lane played it on the show was even worse.

Bailey a genius

@B-ch6uk

4 жыл бұрын

Only geniuses get disbarred

@awesome1ru

5 ай бұрын

Nah Mark is a racist fool

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

Sam Sheppard would agree.

@BG-uf8kh

2 ай бұрын

Your biiiig maaaad ​@@B-ch6uk

so so hilarious that you know he's lying he knows that he's lying and the guy asking the questions know he lying the cop retired after the case

@ryang790

8 жыл бұрын

and then fox 'news' gave him a job.

@smoothie33

4 жыл бұрын

@Sheila Roberts I think he planted evidence with other cops to make it a slam dunk case

@kitpalmer1583

4 жыл бұрын

@@smoothie33 I'm guessing you've watched the ACS TV show, rewatch the scene where Marcia (played beautifully by Sarah Paulson) explains how that's pretty much impossible. Is the LAPD corrupt and full of racist cops? Absolutely, it just wasn't a factor in this case.

@jameswabwire1931

2 жыл бұрын

@@kitpalmer1583 Watch the real trial. A tape by police photographer at 4:13 am on day of murder in OJ's bedroom shows no socks, 20 or 30 minutes later socks magically found on the floor and photos show the bedroom had been tampered with. Examination of the socks found nothing but 3 months later they had blood with edta (anticoagulant) only on the spot. Drop of blood at gate found weeks later which wasn't there initially. Whether OJ was innocent or not the police did plant some evidence.

Furhman using his Fifth Amendment Rights brought suspicion in the minds of the jury

@robosborne5489

2 жыл бұрын

He clearly had something to hide indeed !!

Here's what my attorney friend said once: "If I ever ask a question, I already know what the answer is."

Bailey is a master at his craft. He has furhman, right we’re he wants him.

Episode 6 was the best by far

@newyorkcity1477

8 жыл бұрын

3,6 and 7 were the best for me

@iYaziRz

8 жыл бұрын

+tonyhawkarg episode 9 was imo the best so far

@annetteparker-haynes4510

8 жыл бұрын

+iYaziRz episode 9 was it for me too.

@paulmorris4880

8 жыл бұрын

+jacksonbear1 6 and 9 were the best ones! Intense!

@jacksonbear1

8 жыл бұрын

+Paul Morris Don't forget Episode 10

Competent and classic cross examination that left no loop holes

@christophergargaro959

10 ай бұрын

yup - for all the flash and glitz Johnnie had, there were genuine moments of A+ defense lawyering such as this. Trapped the witness by his own words and forced him to either admit the ugly truth that would sink his credibility or lie and they bury him later. Bailey left no outs here and slammed the door when he said everyone suggesting Fuhrman said that word is a liar and Fuhrman agreed.

and fox news hired him that's how you make it lol

3 жыл бұрын

Racist

the way Nathan Lane said it on the show was so intense but here it's just so calm

@tyronesmith3947

4 жыл бұрын

too small for the mall did you draw your pfp

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

Drama reasons. But Lane was superb. Shame on the Emmys for not nominating him too.

I remember watching the whole trial live. Furhman was the "Wonder Boy" that was going to put the nail in OJ's coffin...then came F Lee Bailey. Absolutely Brilliant!!

@TDKiller415

3 жыл бұрын

Not necessarily. A few jurors have admitted that from day 1 they were going to acquit OJ anyway as payback for Rodney King and Latasha Harlins.

@markanthony9975

3 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 I totally agree. Johnny Cochran changed the narrative of the trial from a double murder to we don't lynch black people in this country. It's your time to take a stand. I have to admit, even watching this trial live, he had a point. It's hard to argue against and a double murder is going to take a back seat for what happened to Rodney King. This probably won't make any sense but I believe OJ killed both of the them and when he was acquitted, I fully understand.

@TDKiller415

3 жыл бұрын

@@markanthony9975 The contents on the tapes were definitely concerning and an indication that the LAPD weren't always fair and something had to be done, but this trial was not the time nor the place. The tapes proved nothing about any evidence being planted or tampered with in that case, all they did was prove that Fuhrman used the n-word (like more than half of white America did, but of course, Cochran put Fuhrman on trial for condemning Simpson), and suggest that the LAPD deliberately targeted blacks for fun. But they still should not have been entered into evidence because they were not material to the case. Anything irrelevant, such as race, should not have been allowed unless it could be proven that they played a role. That was how Judge Hiroshi Fujisaki presided over the civil trial, and that was why Simpson lost, because they focused ONLY on the crime, not irrelevant stuff.

@jameswabwire1931

2 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 The people who claim race is not or was not a factor in America are the same ones who would have preferred an all white jury and not a majority black jury. For most black people especially at the time, they would have told you race was always a factor especially in encounters with police.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameswabwire1931 Black or white, I would have wanted a fair jury. If it meant all white or all Chinese or all Pakistani, so be it, because if an all black jury meant he would walk free despite guilt, then throw them out the window for failing justice because of their own bias, like those white jurors who acquitted those bastards who killed Emmett Till and beat Rodney King. Race had nothing to do with the case, thats why it was kept out of the civil trial, and thats why OJ lost. Only idiot Ito let Cochran bring race into the criminal trial because he was weak.

Putting this racist bully cop on the stand handed O.J an acquittal . F.Lee Bailey sliced this cat up big time and did his job and did it bloody well . Marcia Clark had all the best intentions in the world and as a fan of court dramas I like her style indeed. But sadly she was on a hiding to nothing with this case with Furhman on the stand . Fuhrman ended any hopes of Clark becoming a judge. I also beleive this jury wanted to get back at the white establishment over the Rodney King trial and years of racial bias as well.

checkmate

F Lee Bailey put on a masterclass here. It meant so much more cause bailey did this and not Johnnie cause it shocked so many since Furhman was a liar

Goddamn this was so dramatic. Now I understand why people were glued to the TV watching this in the 90s

@m42037

2 жыл бұрын

You missed out on the best of cinema the 90s on back to the 50s, that was when the best movies and music was made. I'm Gen X, so I was in the middle but old enough to watch most of this trial live

REST IN PEACE MR F LEE BAILEY

To think people believe the jury were idiots! The defense job was to create DOUBT and they did a masterful job.

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

So very, very true. This was just one of many "holy shit" moments of catching witnesses lying.

F Lee Bailey really dropped that hard R.

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

Lol.

The golden rule of a defense lawyer in a case such as this is you never ask a question you don’t already know the answer to. Surprises are often very bad for the defense. Both Fuhrman and the prosecution should’ve known by asking these questions, Bailey and the defense already knew the answer and it wasn’t good for them.

@awesome1ru

5 ай бұрын

They got arrogant and couldn't think it would happen

@MichaelJordanBelfort

4 ай бұрын

@@awesome1runo lol

@loralieisa

3 ай бұрын

If Fuhrrman was a quick study he would have known they had recordings of him using that word, and said something about it to mitigate the damage. Instead he flat out lied.

@chrisdawson1776

3 ай бұрын

Didn't the tapes surface after this question was asked?

@loralieisa

3 ай бұрын

@@chrisdawson1776 They had the tapes prior to him being questioned about whether he had used the N word. It was a trap that he easily fell into.

Professional liar Not that I recall He socked it to him

And you say on your OATH!! I love the cadence of MR. Bailey

@loralieisa

3 ай бұрын

OATH was an important factor when he clearly lied.

Mark Fuhrman should be in an orange jumpsuit doing a perp walk.

@TDKiller415

9 ай бұрын

You mean OJ 😂

@WilliamBrown-vl2hl

9 ай бұрын

Detective Mark Fuhrman was an incompetent Detective. He only@@TDKiller415 became Detective because the Los Angeles police department is corrupt and incompetent.

R.I.P. F. Lee Bailey. OJ loves you! Fuhrman hates you. That is all.

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

Sam Sheppard loves him also.

this is the most embarrassing part of the trial for the prosecution.

@grahamsenior9495

Жыл бұрын

The entire police department got sat on a lap and SPANKED by the defense. And rightfully so as they are incredibly corrupt.

@iPro3million

7 ай бұрын

How is it?

@my.0224

3 ай бұрын

And the glove.

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

There were LOTS of embarrassing moments just like this one. All caught on film, from network cameras at the crime scene to parents taking videos at the dance recital (don't overlook Denise Brown's lies).

Thankfully, OJ was exonerated...because this is really the important fact in the case.

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

Trouble is that there were many "facts" like this in the case.

To me I see Mr. Bailey, I see a hardened, veteran defense attorney. I see Clark, a prosecutor who's very clearly playing to the cameras and to an audience.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

To me, I saw Bailey as a drunken, fat old has-been who couldn't do shit for Patty Hearst and was nothing more than Cochran's race case lackey sell-out for attention because none of them could do shit for OJ either. His narcissism spoke volumes when he said "I don't need reintroducing, I'm F. Lee Bailey." The arrogance of that man, especially after he lost the Hearst case which from what I've read was a winnable one.

@howardstern8720

Жыл бұрын

Very true

@howardstern8720

Жыл бұрын

Someone said that the reason Marcia wanted this case was because she knew she would be on TV Knowing full well that they we're going up against OJ dream team of lawyers...Plus Fuhrman was there star witness and he blew it for the prosecution

"not that I recall" lmaoooo

After this, the jury heard the tapes and when he pled the 5th, Pros. should of offered OJ a deal.

@ginasellers4212

2 жыл бұрын

After the case goes to trial there is no deal to be made.

Masterclass of witness impeachment

where is this on the full video?

And now he is on Fox "News"

@benjamincox4211

5 жыл бұрын

Richie Rich faux news*

@theopenmindedtruthseeker9747

3 жыл бұрын

To be fair even Oprah had him on.

@TriKyTriXx

3 жыл бұрын

@@theopenmindedtruthseeker9747 Oprah didn't hire him. Nice try

@theopenmindedtruthseeker9747

3 жыл бұрын

@@TriKyTriXx But she did have him on is my point. I'm not saying what he said is okay.

@TriKyTriXx

3 жыл бұрын

@@theopenmindedtruthseeker9747 Not a good point. You're implying that she supports his racism. Fox "News" supported his racism. You can't compare the two

who else here was actually watching this live?

@Dawn0fTheShred

8 жыл бұрын

I was, because Power Rangers was supposed to be on but fox aired this instead!

Im here from south park.

@gustavofring8765

4 жыл бұрын

Context please

@MrRampengu

4 жыл бұрын

Lol same

@MrRampengu

4 жыл бұрын

Im here for michael jackson chapter

@Evan99997

4 жыл бұрын

context?

@ThePipeg4

4 жыл бұрын

@Ashley Roberts season 11 episode 1. Randy says the n word and joins a group of people who also said the word to stop people from calling them out

If he lied about that it’s fair to assume he’s lying about what occurred in this case. Remember, the defense didn’t have to prove anything the burden was on the prosecution, and they failed miserably

The real despicable part is at the end, the prosecutor should not be disparaging the other attorneys in that way. Marcia Clark was out of line.

This only confirmed what the community already knew.

The problem with this case was that it became more about the lawyers on both side, than it ever was about the defendant and/or the victims. And that there exists and and/or proves it. End of story.

@Berkmugga

Жыл бұрын

That’s because the defendant had an ironclad alibi which should have cleared him and turned the investigators to other suspects, but they decided to frame him instead. The prosecution had a false case which made it a contentious battle between the two sides. The correct verdict was found and the people involved who continue to disagree with it are just prostituting Simpson for money at this point. He’s a Hoe to them. Really very shameful people particularly the Golddiggers Fred and his ugly face daughter.

@benjamincox4211

Жыл бұрын

No the problem was the lead detectives were racist and corrupt

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

No, the problem with this case was all the lies that the prosecuting witnesses got caught telling.

F.LEE BAILEY THE DON

When a racial slur is a bigger crime than a double homicide... 🤡💩💯

@thecrow970

7 ай бұрын

God bless America. By the way he was NOT GUILTY. just like rottenhouse

@Mr.Drewski

6 ай бұрын

You missed the point. It would have been “ok” if he had used the word and admitted it. The problem is that he lied under oath. And if you’ll do it once, there is nothing to say you’ve never done it before or will do it again

@TDKiller415

4 ай бұрын

Woke America: The Early Days

@harrycallahan9143

2 ай бұрын

@@Mr.Drewski Fuhrman was damned if he admitted using the N word and damned if he denied it, that was the whole point why they confronted him with it in the first place, he was cornered, even if he said yes it would have made him look like a racist cop so not to be trusted, no wonder he pleaded the 5th and called it a day because he knew no matter what he said next O J's cronies would twist it and say dismiss all his evidence....regardless there was about 12 officers there's before Fuhrman at Bundy's all saying the same thing, he didn't plant anything.

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

No, the racial slur just cast doubt on who committed the double homicide. Are you truly this stupid?

I always wondered why no one on the prosecution objected to this irrelevant line of questioning. Now I'm wondering why the idiot Ito overruled the objection.

Episode #9 brought me here...Furman is the devil and should be treated as such...

@itoro22

8 жыл бұрын

That's why I'm here lol

@richbern7622

8 жыл бұрын

+Nicole Collins I can't wait to see #10

@itoro22

8 жыл бұрын

Me too. I've been recording these series because I can't sit through these one hour long commercials lol.

@richbern7622

8 жыл бұрын

+Nicole Collins I hate commercials too....I've been watching it on my firestick...commercial free😆😆😆

@ose3291

2 жыл бұрын

@@itoro22 do you mean the American crime story one ? Cos I’m kind of confused is the show entirely based on the true story wanted to know if there was added drama or something

Reminds me of an impala drinking water from the murky Zambezi river an aware of the 16 feet 2000 pounds crocodile lurking deep inside the water. F. Lee Bailey and his team where a heck of perfectionist lawyers..

He couldn’t tell that Bailey was lining him up.

Why wasn't this a investigated for police misconduct?

@jonnybcool2000

5 жыл бұрын

he was charged with perjury … and quit the LAPD right after , he was an idiot for lying on the stand … However , Furhman took a lie detector test about the glove and pass actions against blacks and passed , OJ failed his lie detector test about the murders … of course OJ denies any wrong doing .. sad case …

that, my friends, is what you call a catch 22

@fawazalkhelaiwi2525

2 күн бұрын

How so?

I watch this cross over and over again. He thought he was going to back down and they’ve heard the tapes.

Wow.

When words are worse than double murder

@malacki6554

3 жыл бұрын

Jesse W Using that logic, murder and rape aren’t bad either because they both happen regularly too. It’s deeper than just a word, it’s about slavery and the oppression of black people in America.

@isaacm2374

3 жыл бұрын

It's about lying under oath and detective being an unreliable witness whose testimony on the case should be discarded.

@ChrisDodges123

3 жыл бұрын

That's more now than then.

@hvc755

3 жыл бұрын

That's right!...that's why Cochran et-al had a party after unvealing the Furhman's tapes!

@slickrick2420

2 жыл бұрын

He pleaded the 5th when asked if he has planted evidence to frame OJ, clearly he did do just that

this was on tonight's episode and I was gagging

Check and mate

And this what sets up “OJ Not Guilty” 🙄 smh

@steverenom.299

2 ай бұрын

As it should have.

Look at the way Ms Clark is defending Fuhrman's honor knowing that everything that Bailey is saying is true. When the defence blows the cover on Fuhrman she sings a different tune and allows Ms Luis to try and stop more evidence from coming in. Ms Clark had to take a backseat to every lawyer OJ had. Darden was just for show and it was obvious to everyone in that courtroom and the public .

Mr. Bailey, this is a serious child abuse.

They will never say that word in Court Today....

0:42

South park brought me here

@themasonguy6588

4 жыл бұрын

Timothy E Gann Same

And now he works for fox news

I just sow episode 6 on the internet and came here to check it out on the internet, internet is amazing

I’m glad I was alive an old enough (teenager at the time) to understand the magnitude of this case. There’s never been anything like it. OJ was guilty as all hell, but damn Bailey was a hell of an attorney.

I love Chinese food

@mattyo9115

8 жыл бұрын

Lol I hear ya brother! Same here! Ya gotta make light out of the bullshit and lies this country nowadays ACCEPTS and believes(sadly) as truth! Live life to the fullest, eat that Chinese food! Haha

@m42037

2 жыл бұрын

General Tso chicken, white meat!

Wow, when I watched this scene in the 6th ep of the OJ show, I thought it was creative embellishment, but then I saw this and it's almost verbatim. Wow, top ten court moment. 2nd would be the opening statement in Casey Anthony by her lawyer Jose Baez.

The great F Lee Baily kicked Furman ass but in the end they all earned millions on the OJ case love it!!!!!!!

F Lee Bailey was the man for even asking that question. He completely discredited Fuhrman

I'm shocked Trump didn't add him to his cabinet. He has all the qualities Trump likes with the exception that he hasn't sold his soul to mother Russia.

@Contractnik

6 жыл бұрын

Yeah. Right. Dumbass.

@russlh5497

6 жыл бұрын

Jesse Jimenez Dumbest comment of the year award goes to you.

he really enjoyed saying that word...

Prosecution is dumb that they allowed these questions. They lost the case.

I can’t believe this is a real trial... what a circus

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

Watch the civil trial. That was the REAL murder case.

An obvious dog whistle to the jury w/ the constant repeating of the N word. Clever, Mr. Bailey.

Lol he did use the word

i´m here just for South Park

Imagine wasting tax payer dollars in whatever this is over a word

And Mr Bailey was right all along and Marcia was wrong all along and had to apologize the next day. She then claimed Fuhrman was a choir boy and later said Furhman was the worst possible human being in her closing. Too funny watching her acting.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

She should have pointed out that Fuhrman recently exonerated a black drug dealer who'd been wrongfully accused of killing a white man. What white supremacist does that?

@lynndragoman1573

2 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 it was too late by then he already plead the 5th about planting evidence and lying under oath

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@lynndragoman1573 Would've been better than openly wishing him never born. I mean, he wasn't the one who butchered two people.

@lynndragoman1573

2 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 we don't know what atrocities he committed

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@lynndragoman1573 Neither did Cochran, but he had the audacity to compare him to Adolf Hitler, with no evidence whatsoever to back it up other than interviews for a fictional screenplay. There was evidence to prove he'd worked hard to exonerate blacks, Bill Hodgman came forward after the trial and admitted they had loads of it, the Arrick Harris case was just one of them. Vincent Bugliosi and lots of other officials criticised Clark and Darden for not providing this evidence to make a fool of Cochran and show that Fuhrman was not a racist, and if he was, he had long since grown and matured out of it. There is such a thing as change. Go and watch the This Is England series which were based on a true story.

furman did say it. and tgey made him to plead the fifth

Crazy thing is if he would've told the truth the defense would've been in a world of trouble because other than the glove this is all they had.

The judge in this case should of never allowed evidence about the witnesses character until the defense could produce evidence that Furham actually planted evidence first. Such a line of questioning is ridiculously unfair and irreverent as to the accused guilt.

@ilovehonglong

4 жыл бұрын

Finally someone with legal knowledge here...

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

Ito was intimidated by Cochran and Bailey. The way Judge Fujisaki handled the civil trial, disallowing what Ito should have disallowed like you just said, THAT was why OJ lost the civil trial.

@chainreaction1703

2 жыл бұрын

@@TDKiller415 What? He lost the civil trial because there is a lower burden of proof. It is a preponderance of evidence in a civil trial not beyond reasonable doubt. Also, how could a judge not allow the defense to question the character of witnesses? That is an insane view that gives the prosecution all the leverage. That would be a poor example of a justice system. So, a cop who suppose to be above reproach should be allowed to sidestep questions about his character? Get out of here.

@TDKiller415

2 жыл бұрын

@@chainreaction1703 The character of witnesses is not relevant to the trial. If it is, then defence lawyers can get their guilty clients off by asking witnesses about their sexual orientation or their history of cheating on lovers or their weight, and if ONE of their answers is incorrect, they can denounce them as an untrustworthy liar. Get out of here, OJ-supporting racist clown, butthurt because black murderer got what was coming to him 🤡🤡

What does it matter if a guy uses a word in privacy? What does it have to do with OJ Simpson murdering Nicole and Ron? The Defense pulled the race card and THAT ladies and gentleman is why the murderer walked...karma still got him though 😂

@pureuncutlakers1010

8 жыл бұрын

+Jacob Burke That and the fact that Furhman pled the fifth to planting evidence in this case and many others.

@anthonylewis3095

8 жыл бұрын

+Jacob Burke No it didn't you just told a more believable story. Where do you go to Law Schoo

@anthonylewis3095

8 жыл бұрын

+Jacob Burke law school?

@anthonylewis3095

8 жыл бұрын

Taharkah X Especially when dealing with the racist organization known as the LAPD.

@anthonylewis3095

8 жыл бұрын

Taharkah X It amazes me how people want justice but it's okay to break the law in their eyes to get that justice. They go on and on about the evidence clearly we know where the evidence is pointing.....yet, contaminated, police policy and procedure, and the history of LAPD isn't a factor. The double standard is a joke but I understand the sense and need of entitlement.

Fuhrman screwed up. He should never answered Bailey's hypothetical question.

@ilovehonglong

4 жыл бұрын

Fuhrman should not be allowed to answer these questions, and warnings should be given to Bailey by Ito.

Looks like the show got it right!

It's crazy how this whole event fit like a glove in the sleazy world of 90s tabloid journalism. I think a good thing about this horrible murders is that the laymen got to know the criminal justice system and what rights we have as Americans

F Lee probably needed sum good security after this LOL

@jamesb1988

3 жыл бұрын

No way! Besides for Cochrane, Bailey was the second most vital person in getting OJ acquitted. Now I'm no lawyer so I can't explain exactly why, but there's a reason that Bailey was the one to ask these particular questions... I feel like it was an attempt to vilify the word even more, and make Fuhrman more despicable. Cause lets face it, hearing a black voice use the term is a lot more commonplace/normal, where as any time a white person says it it immediately causes feelings of unease (as it should).