Totally INSANE "Electric Jerry Can" is PURE FANTASY | MGUY Australia
Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары
Send tips or stories to email: simon@mguy.tv or / mguytv - thanks!
Sign up for MGUY email newsletters here: zcu.nz/MhEZ
Source: m-g.uy/s6r
Follow MGUY on Twitter/X: / mguytv
Follow MGUY on Instagram: / mguy.tv
Follow MGUY on Facebook: / mguytv
MGUY Website: mguy.tv
Contact MGUY: simon@mguy.tv
Пікірлер: 1 200
They will charge them up on the battlefield using a diesel generator 😂😂
@robinbeckford
17 күн бұрын
Sitting ducks for an FPV drone!
@prjndigo
17 күн бұрын
by the time the figure out how to keep EV-seeking-missiles from attacking combat vehicles based on their motor noise we'll probably have solar panels that charge the batteries while protecting from laser weapons....
@hendrickswart4122
17 күн бұрын
A battery on a drone can work very nice.... Not for the propulsion, but rater for the beauty of thermal runaway when you need it most. 😜
@mhelmreich1
17 күн бұрын
You don't need to carry explosives so that saves some weight, you just need something to trigger thermal runaway of the battery 😂
@badchefi
17 күн бұрын
Camouflaged solar panels will do just fine.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire
@martentrudeau6948
17 күн бұрын
Great Voltaire quote.
@user-wm3bf7pi3u
17 күн бұрын
"They tell me what they think, but they stink and I really don't care." -Brian Johnson.
@gaiustacitus4242
17 күн бұрын
Almost every citizen of these United States believes the false narrative that our Union is a nation and that the member nations (the States) of the Union are not sovereigns but derive their Powers from the Constitution, when in fact it was the free, independent, and sovereign States which ceded only limited Powers to the Union, with those Powers to be wielded by Congress via legislative Acts. Look around at the outcome of the People having permitted the United States of America to act as a nation and you will see a long and bloody history of atrocities.
@caleroby9483
14 күн бұрын
Yes its Is. Truth too.
@martentrudeau6948
14 күн бұрын
Another great Voltaire quote: “If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
As a fun fact, Jerry cans have three handles on the top. The reason there is three is so if you are carrying it alone, you carry it by the middle handled, but if two people are carrying it, each person takes a handle on each side to carry it. I've also read that during the Second World War, one of the things Allied soldiers always looted from German tanks/trucks/vehicles was the Jerry cans because they were so much better than whatever the Allies were supplied with. I suppose to make an "electric Jerry can" with similar energy density as it's namesake, instead of three handles it will need forklift pocket holes.
@itspart
17 күн бұрын
Also carry 2 with one hand (empty)
@budimpla
17 күн бұрын
❤
@papalegba6796
17 күн бұрын
I think they were called Jerry cans because they were German. Jerries being the nickname for Germans.
@RandomRants525
17 күн бұрын
@papalegba6796 We've allready covered that bit mate. Keep up.
@rogerbradbury9713
17 күн бұрын
Another fun fact is that the central seam (rather than seams on the edges) means that impact damage is unlikely to cause a leak. The whole thing is a brilliant design, which is why it's still used.
It's like watching a good friend doing alcoholism .you have to step back and let them come to the decision
@jonathanchurch7561
17 күн бұрын
Great way of putting it 👍 because it's also that sad!!
@AlanRoberts-xy4wu
17 күн бұрын
Well put 👍
@bobloblaw204
17 күн бұрын
Please, we are not that lame. Cheers.
@curlcurllocal
17 күн бұрын
Great way to put it, something I struggle with when people tell me not to buy another hilux and yet the past two appreciated in value before selling lol
@The_Irish_Volunteer
17 күн бұрын
Not gonna happen when they have only two brain cells.
Right up there with EVtanks 😂😂😂😂
@AndrewTSq
17 күн бұрын
a EV getting hit by a missile.. and the battery get deformed and thermal runaway + producing explosive gases. isnt it easier just to give up and wave the white flag?
@JohnSmith-pl2bk
17 күн бұрын
The ZipCharge Go is legitimately a world-first for portable electric vehicle charging. It’s a suitcase-sized solution-complete with wheels-fitting conveniently into your EV’s boot. It comes in 4kWh to 8kWh sizes and can charge an electric car up to 20 miles in 30-60 minutes-depending on the vehicle’s battery spec. You can charge it using a three-pin plug.
@petew8388
17 күн бұрын
EV tank.... LOL !........one turn of the tracks and it would need recharging ..
@xr6lad
17 күн бұрын
@@JohnSmith-pl2bkso takes up valuable boot space? How big is it?
@Vladviking
17 күн бұрын
@@petew8388 Well Biden believes in them anyway. Wants to make everything military EV. Of course nobody can blame Biden for even knowing how to change out a couple AA's.
Wow, another "game changing" EV breakthrough.
@lesliecarter4295
17 күн бұрын
Stand by for another exiting break through video from the Electric Viking?
@jozefibaraki9099
17 күн бұрын
I see them every week. Only on newsfeed though.
@ahorton6786
17 күн бұрын
Next week…..flying ev cars 🤣🤣🤣
@kcu189
17 күн бұрын
More like a goalpost moving EV breakthrough
@garreysellars5525
17 күн бұрын
Electric vicking I gave up on him two years ago
..1Kg of diesel = 12600 Wh.. ..1Kg of Li-Ion = 260 Wh.. ..future my arse..
@mellarner8253
17 күн бұрын
An ICE running at only 3% efficiency would still have more range
@trogdortheburninator8149
17 күн бұрын
It’s quite amazing isn’t it ❤
@user-kc1tf7zm3b
17 күн бұрын
EVs certainly are the future as solar electricity to run EV is *free* . You cannot beat zero dollars. Never. On the other hand, it costs AUD $42,000 to operate a petrol car over 20 years, which is in addition to the initial $50,000 purchase price of the car. Only an out and out moron would still insist on buying a new petrol car in 2030 due to high running costs. Let alone the car being worthless when it is time to dispose of it. Petrol cars are inefficient and obsolete.
@mellarner8253
17 күн бұрын
@@user-kc1tf7zm3b Quite the opposite, the cost of EV ownership is huge. Pretty much worthless at 4 years old, earlier if battery goes wrong, insurance costs are only going to increase, and solar installations that need replacing within 20 years ( batteries sooner) are very expensive if the array is going to be needed to charge an EV and run a home, that is a lot of KW - and when the sun don’t shine…….. By contrast an ICE that is properly looked after will easily go 20 years and some. A huge % of cars are in constant use that were not built in this century.
@jkbughunt
17 күн бұрын
@@user-kc1tf7zm3b your idiotic comment deserves little else than this," when you talk out your ass its easy to say dumb shit",
EDIT. Can we end this idiotic discussion with a summary? - Battery powered small planes exist, but the reality is that they are only toys. Short range, tiny number of passengers. - This will improve as and when battery technology improve, specifically battery storage density by both weight and volume. - Battery storage density is not improving anywhere near enough for these toys to grow much bigger. - That said, the battery equivalent of something like a Boeing 777 or an Airbus A350, where when fully laden has the weight of the jet fuel at like fully one third (!) of takeoff weight, is well and truly beyond any kind of foreseeable horizon. Indeed currently in the "impossible" bucket, where I am going to predict it will stay. For several reasons which I shall not list here. Which was my entire point at the very beginning. This week, the reality deniers at Your ABC were telling us that "as soon as next year" we will be flying in battery electric aeroplanes. Complete fantasy.
@TheGuruStud
17 күн бұрын
You mean those single seater $50k+ dollar toys that can fly for 20 mins before needing recharged? LOL. What part of rich people toys don't they understand?
@starpawsy
17 күн бұрын
@@TheGuruStud 1. Yes, that's them. 2. Your ABC understands very little of reality. They live in a concocted fabrication in an alternative universe, And worst of all, there are a couple of million Australians who watch / listen_to them, that think that that fantasy is actually an achievable reality in our lifetimes.
@hendrickswart4122
17 күн бұрын
I thought that was for kamikaze purposes only?
@gazzafloss
17 күн бұрын
Well, there goes the airline industry safety record...
@user-ze2om1de8w
17 күн бұрын
Aviation rules require a 30 minute reserve of fuel for any flight, last I checked. Most of the electric planes produced so far (that I have seen) only have about 40 minutes total at full charge (only recreational planes). Not to mention who wants to be in a battery thermal runaway at 25000 feet?
Even these arguments about ‘efficiency’ of EV’s tend to ignore the inefficiency of the grid and moving electricity around wires.
@schwarzerritter5724
17 күн бұрын
Just because you are burning the fossil fuel somewhere else does not mean you are not burning fossil fuel. EV proponents have the object permanence of toddlers.
@phprofYT
17 күн бұрын
... and wives.
@hansemannluchter643
17 күн бұрын
Shhh, don't mention the war!!
@jeffbroders9781
17 күн бұрын
Everytime energy changes form there's a net loss.
@timothykeith1367
17 күн бұрын
The grid uses high frequency to negate some of the long distance power losses - thats the large transmission lines raised on high poles, the local grid has significant losses. The high frequency lines can cost in the neighborhood of a billion or more dollars , which is why grids are regional. Upgrading the grid to move solar power from the desert can cause the rates to be very high. A lot of the green grid is subsidized - its difficult to determine the true costs of electricity. The climate change agenda tells us wind and solar is "cheap", but subsidies hide the true costs.
A jerry can costs about 20 dollars, but a ruggedized e-jerry can will likely cost 20 thousand dollars, especially if it’s made for a military budget. It will likely have a range of 5 to 10 kilometers. I guess that’s better than pushing the military EV to a charging station 😉
@user-xq6me6pd7q
17 күн бұрын
I would say its less than half that distance. Remember military vehicles are heavier and whatever is in the battery it won't be at the same voltage as the battery in the vehicle itself. Blind leading the stupid yet again but someone will spend £100 million discovering why its not going to work.
@rutessian
17 күн бұрын
They won't push it, they'll use diesel trucks.
@ronmatthews1738
17 күн бұрын
Then there are the logistics of transporting these things, which is going to take a lot more equipment, especially if it is electrically-powered.
@TheSledgehammer205
17 күн бұрын
@@ronmatthews1738 Let alone the utter insanity of carrying something that is self-oxidizing and explosively flammable. What would possibly go wrong in a harsh environment such as a military conflict.
@richardkammerer2814
17 күн бұрын
Moving forward so very little, we’ll have to resort to trench warfare. Oh, wait, trenches tend to get wet. War is hell.
Hmm carrying a BOMB basically. What could possibly go wrong.
Hahahaha, they are in a total fantasy land. I'm surprised one of these nuts haven't suggested putting a wind mill generator on their cars so they can charge the batteries while driving.
@gazzafloss
17 күн бұрын
And a solar panel for night driving... Submitted by A. Albo.
@user-lj9ld8ir1e
17 күн бұрын
Or a sail,like on a yacht.
@simonhunter8338
17 күн бұрын
A friend actually suggested this - a nice guy but not too smart.
@MikeInc79
17 күн бұрын
Far better! Volvo offers an ICE for your EV to charge the battery while driving so you don't need so many charging stops. Totaly madness! Why not the opposit instead. Like crossing the river to fetch water
@AdLockhorst-bf8pz
17 күн бұрын
Cover your EV in solar panels 😊👍
20kg of fossil fuel will give me a range of over 200km. A 20kg battery might give an extra 20kms.
@ryszard68
17 күн бұрын
It's called gravimetric energy density - ie how much energy a system contains in comparison to its mass measured in Megajoules per Kg. If you're comparing Gas and Li-on batteries this ratio is in the order of 100:1. Pretty much an insurmountable problem that they can't get around otherwise they would have figured it out by now.
@after_midnight9592
17 күн бұрын
Yeah, on an electric scooter. 20 kg battery is what we use to start up a car.
@badchefi
17 күн бұрын
20kg of fossil fuel have the energy of roughly 180kWh - I get 1350km of range with 180kWh of electricity. Nothing is more energy efficient than a battery car.
@badchefi
17 күн бұрын
@@after_midnight9592you hav ego keep in mind that your 20kg lead acid starter battery holds about a quarter what the same weight LFP battery holds.
@hudsonbear5038
17 күн бұрын
@@badchefi BULLSH""... you Do NOT get 1350km in your EV... The best EV on the market does 727.5km in PERFECT conditions
Imagine a round or shrapnel going through one battery in a stack of these EV jerry cans.
@LLcreeker
17 күн бұрын
next up, armored EV jerry cans.
@pbxn-3rdx-85percent
17 күн бұрын
bullet punctures one of hundreds of EV jerry can in storage. 5 seconds later...💥💥💥ADIOS MUCHACHOS!!!🤣🤣🤣
@PSUQDPICHQIEIWC
17 күн бұрын
@@LLcreeker Considering we're squarely in clown world here, it's probable. Either they eat up all their available weight and volume with converters and armor and wind up with the capacity of a used drill pack, or they go whole hog and stuff the thing with cells without any structural or thermal engineering and create something that simultaneously has enough capacity to be a bomb, but is still too small to be useful for the intended purpose
So a Jerry can at about $20 dollars and $30 dollars to fill will not only get you home but add a significant range to your car. Or a several thousand dollar battery will just about get you to the nearest charging station…..
@robinbeckford
17 күн бұрын
Where you then have to recharge both batteries. Happy days!
@UlyssesTurner-vf2xh
17 күн бұрын
And wait a few hours perhaps? I'll be shouting at them what the public said when the first and unreliable automobiles were rich people's toys - "Get a horse!". After all,a horse will be at least a 1000x greener than an electric car.
@aftonline
17 күн бұрын
Or you could just follow best practice of keeping your EV battery between 20 and 80% and then you'll never need to spend an extra cent. It's amazing how much time and money you can save by using some common sense.
@williamhaynes7089
16 күн бұрын
@@aftonline at 80% i cant even get the full "range" of the car
@Audioremedy0785
16 күн бұрын
@@williamhaynes7089anti EV folk love obsessing over the ‘80%’ thing. In reality it’s just a guideline to optimise health of your battery. In an assumption that don’t need it to be at 100%. However if you are going on a long journey you should use all 100%. All it really serves as is an example of how little the anti EV brigade really understand about the basics. I love watching those videos where people who hate EVs take a Tesla out. The way their eyes light up and the lightbulb moment where they convert. Its usually seconds.
Yep a jerry can full of spare electrons there is obviously no end to the stupidity,every day i think can it get any more ridiculous and every day it does
The only issue with a battery pack that is needed to recharge an squadron of EV tanks is that you would first have to build miles of roads or railway track for the battery pack to actually be able to get there in the form of a mile long convoy of trucks or a similar length train. “Hey, mister enemy dictator, would you please stop your tanks so we can recharge, please, as it is otherwise not going be a proper contest as you have ICE power, or we warn you, we will not play with you any more, as it is not fair”
@TheZodiacz
17 күн бұрын
"and dear enemy- please do not strafe our convoys of batteries- they tend to go into thermal runaway.."
@urbanspaceman7183
17 күн бұрын
Because ICE vehicles don't depend on a supply chain lol.
@mellarner8253
17 күн бұрын
@@urbanspaceman7183 supply chains are critical for all manufactured goods. However, the amount of EV car manufacturers going bust will have a huge impact on warranties and spares. Once they go out of business, that is it, no further back up or supply chain at all. That could be said for car manufacturers in general, as they are being dragged down by huge losses being incurred on what are still very expensive EV’s even at 50% discount. It also has knock on effects on parts and component suppliers who do not get paid, not pretty for them either.
I'd like to see an EV decked out for the Paris Dakar rally with portable batteries strapped all over the roof 😳 🤣
But even in layman's, the Tesla 3 battery weighs almost 500kg for its range and that as compact as it can be. So you'd need more than 25 batterys for the equivalent range, all depending on the health and safety lift allowances in your country. What percentage of EV drivers could even lift these things LOL
From a mechanic your spot on
My 10kWh LiFePO4 battery I use in the house with my solar power plant weighs about 85kg. It took 3 people to lift and install it. And it certainly not portable.
The other big difference is when a Jerrycan is finished it weighs bugger all. But a battery when its empty wieghs the same. So you can't lighten the load as you empty the energy Storage unit
@3UZFE
17 күн бұрын
Excellent point. That also happens with aeroplanes, as the fuel burns the weight decreases so efficiency increases later into the flight.
@RandomRants525
17 күн бұрын
@@3UZFE Thanks mate. Us smart guys must stick together to ward off all the Stupid in this world. It is a mighty task but together is our only hope of defeating it. It's a lost cause but hey, it's worth a shot isn't it?
Think how many times you could recharge your iPhone though..
@williamhaynes7089
16 күн бұрын
i dont have an iphone (or want one.. yes i can afford it) , but i could charge my Phone many times
Brilliant. Well done MGUY on your description of petrol engines as really "air engines"... with the weight of the combusting oxygen (9,000 litres of air per litre) being held in the atmosphere not in the jerry can. Whereas lithium batteries embed oxygen as extra weight within the battery.
Can't wait for the ev version of the challenger tank. Lol
Every electric car should come with a free diseal generator 👍👍👍
@rumpoh8039
17 күн бұрын
ATLAS COPCO 4 WHEELER
@user-ze2om1de8w
15 күн бұрын
Havent you seen the Mazda "Self Charging EV"? It has an 80km range and a petrol motor. They arent even trying to hide the lie anymore. Just use Orwellian doublespeak to divert attention from the obvious.
@Audioremedy0785
14 күн бұрын
@@user-ze2om1de8w ‘the lie’ being what?
@user-ze2om1de8w
12 күн бұрын
@@Audioremedy0785 Oh grow up. The lie is obvious. Read the comment and then have someone who can comprehend explain it to you.
@Audioremedy0785
12 күн бұрын
@@user-ze2om1de8w I don’t understand what lie you are implying. I don’t think anyone understands what you are implying which is why no one else responded. Maybe explain it?
It's called power to weight ratio, ice cars might only be 40% efficient, but at least they are not lugging around a 500Kg energy supply.
@genxray951
17 күн бұрын
plus the weight of the ICE car goes down as the fuel gets used, making them slightly more efficient as the fuel tank drains, not so with an EV, they are lugging that weight no matter what.
@Rawdiswar
16 күн бұрын
@@genxray951Great point, hadn't considered that. 👍
@Audioremedy0785
14 күн бұрын
@@genxray951 but Ice car engines get less efficient over time whereas EV motors don’t.
As you pointed out we’ve already got power banks and they’re heavy and capable of charging phones and running laptops and perhaps even heating up some water whilst you’re camping. Certainly not charging an EV battery. The point of a power bank is generally a battery larger than the one in the device you want to top up with charge. How long will it be before someone suggests filling your limited boot space with a spare battery so you can drag even more weight around than you already do? Are there any physicists left?
@VK4VO
17 күн бұрын
Which actually won't add more range, the law of deminishing returns makes sure of that. On average, it takes 10kwh to move 1 tonne of total mass to 100kms distance.
@aftonline
16 күн бұрын
There's no point. That's like carrying a jerry can of fuel in your boot just in case you didn't look at your fuel gauge and figure out that maybe you should stop for fuel. Best practice with EV's is to charge between 20% and 80% to preserve the battery. Also helps preserve your peace of mind because you aren't constantly running out of juice.
The "Electric Jerry Can" has probably around 3 Kwh. Otherwise it would be to heavy to carry around. Maybe you can charge your electric car so "much" to go another ~ 16 Kilometers (~10 Miles) Maybe less. A Petrol car most likely will go ~ 200 - 300 Kilometers with a 20 Liter Can.
@after_midnight9592
17 күн бұрын
I'd say they'd be used for laptops and other wireless surveillance and communication equipment, like drone remote controls.
@dmitripogosian5084
17 күн бұрын
@@after_midnight9592 Maybe small drones themselves
Use a portable diesel generator to recharge your tesla😂
I think it's really nice of the British Army to concern itself so much with the carbon emissions of its vehicles that are designed to blow the shit out of entire towns and scorch the earth for miles around them. That's forward thinking, that is.
@planesounds
17 күн бұрын
Yeah, when the military talk about "carbon footprint" we can see it. It's big and it's black and you can see it from space. And has the same relevance as the one that the enviro-nutters try to guilt us about.
As another reference, the 30MJ contained in a single litre of petrol is the equivalent of 7,165,377 calories
@rustysworldofentertainment850
17 күн бұрын
Knowing that a single litre of petrol is equal to 9 years of food is strangely comforting.
@col0342
17 күн бұрын
@@rustysworldofentertainment850 heck no, the "dietary calorie" is 1 physical kcal. 30MJ would be enough for 3 days of food intake of an average male. Can get about the same from eating a kilo of butter, it's not much different from 1kilo of diesel when your burn it.
Dear Mguy I have to confess that my truck is hybrid diesel-electric. But only when I winch it out of the mud xD
Love the term "Air engine". I used the call "the gas pedal" on older non F.I. engines the "air pedal".
@timsmith2525
17 күн бұрын
You still can. The ECU delivers fuel volume based on measured air volume. That's what the Mass Air Flow sensor is for.
@user-or4hs7xq9u
17 күн бұрын
@@timsmith2525 thanks, when someone tells me they are a "Petrol head" I usually have some fun with them. The "air pedal" was one of the questions I ask for fun. As I'm a motorcycle person I usually have sneeky engine related questions also for petrol heads they can't answer either. Cruel but fun.
Such excellent, proveable insight. Thank you!
I have an idea! What if you connect this electric Gerald Can to something like a Honda EG3500X (generator), you start it with the electric Gerald Can and then you use the Honda to recharge your Tesla? GENIUS!!!
@richardjohnson8009
17 күн бұрын
where do they get the money to make this stuff lol
@OM617a
17 күн бұрын
@@richardjohnson8009 By duping investors who get rinsed and end up with nothing. I don't have a lot of sympathy for them.
@simonhunter8338
17 күн бұрын
@@OM617a Im waiting for the kit to convert a Tesla to ICE...LOL
@RobertHolmes-mu8re
17 күн бұрын
@@OM617a The problem is the investors are us the poor taxpayer who are being fleeced continually.
@OM617a
17 күн бұрын
@@RobertHolmes-mu8re This true once a product comes to market and is subsidised, but during development they are mostly funded by private investors. There could be some form of tax payer funding though, I cannot be sure.
I would guess that you're going to use more energy dragging that much weight too and from the site it's being used on than they will provide. A Jerry can when empty is way lighter than full, obviously, but not a battery. You're lugging around the same weight charged or not.
Oh dear. This content is getting certifiable.
ev owners only look at the effiency of the motor... and ignoring the heating of the car takes up to 3kw, and preheating the battery and so on... meanwhile that ice engine uses the heat it produces to heat up the car, or cool down the car.
@simonhunter8338
17 күн бұрын
The electric motor is fantastic with 1 moving part and max torque from zero RPM. The battery on the other hand is a huge stinking pile of poisonous chemicals waiting to burst into an unstoppable fire.
@AndrewTSq
17 күн бұрын
@@simonhunter8338 simplicity, that is why I like a 2 stroke engine!, if you look at it, its 3 moving parts. It sounds nice, smells great and gives a lot of hp for its cylindersize and can rev really high :)
@reiniernn9071
17 күн бұрын
I never noticed that my heating uses 3KW. In the worst case it was 600watts (0,6KW).
@Audioremedy0785
14 күн бұрын
An ice engine uses the heat it generates in the heating. Which is great when needed. But the other 98% of the time that super inefficient motor is wasting energy creating heat that’s a waste product. Sounds like a great idea 🤦
It's starting to feel like nothing MGUY could say could surprise me anymore
@TonyRule
17 күн бұрын
How about *_"I've just bought an electric car and I love it!"_* ?😉
During the war, jerry cans were chucked aside like used lunch wrappers by the troops. At 7.5K per wrapper, it might be a bit expensive for even the military
The company should change its name, from Solus to Soul-Less 🤭.
The size of a jerrycan, the weight of a tank.🤣
I am being to think a horse might be of better use as transport.
Can’t wait for Quentin Wilson’s spin on this 🤣🤣🤣
@urbanspaceman7183
17 күн бұрын
We all know he talks 💩 like a lot of the people posting here. Extreme views are rarely correct, the truth is almost always somewhere between the two.
They spelt soulless wrong. If they could figure the electric jerry can then maybe I could have my Ironman Suit I always wanted.
I always enjoy your videos, but this one is especially brilliant. The analogy of air in an ICE vs the oxidizer in an EV (or other) battery really explains why batteries have to be so massive for the energy they carry. What an insight!
@pbxn-3rdx-85percent
17 күн бұрын
It's like rocket engine versus jet engine Rockets, carry both fuel and oxidizer while jets carry only fuel. The oxidizer is everywhere. You just need a big hole so the jet engine can suck all the oxidizer it needs 😄
The whole point of a jerry can is it is light and easy to carry to be filled up when needed. A battery even when empty weights a lot so is always extra weight to lug about. To be fair these portable batteries have been used by breakdown services in the UK for a while now and they normally keep a couple fully topped up in their vans. Some also carry a small diesel generator but this takes much longer to put charge into a dead EV so batteries are the preferred option. Normally they only provide enough charge to go another 10 miles though so better hope there is a quick charger near by.
I'm pretty sure that this is intended as a mobile ruggedised battery source for front-line use to charge light equipment such as small unmanned vehicles (drones). Some marketing idiot has added in electric vehicles. As a practical example, I fly radio control aircraft, a decade or two ago this meant 2-Stroke ICE motors but it is predominantly electric these days. But, typically I get 6 minutes flight from each battery pack so with my four packs my afternoon down at the flying field now means just 24 minutes actual flying. So I, and many others in the hobby, recharge from our car batteries and some of us carry a separate small car or motorcycle battery for charging at the field. I suspect that is what the British Army want, but rather than pay £50 for small car battery they will pay QinetQ millions of pounds to develop ruggedised batteries which will then cost them £50k a pop.
@TheGuruStud
17 күн бұрын
No, that would be a battery pack on wheels.
@sullivanrachael
17 күн бұрын
The rate drone warfare is dominating the Ukraine conflict - I think quiet, cheap, relatively stealthy UAVs are the new frontier of ‘small arms’ on the battlefield. So I think this electric jerrycan is not about topping up EVs for transport, it’s about recharging drone and comms gear batteries quietly without a thermal signature in forward areas. Otherwise there’d be no point.
@DurzoBlunts
17 күн бұрын
Then they shouldn't have shown a guy using 4 stacked to charge his range Rover. This is for elites residing in the UK that employ private guards/mercs. Never once did I see a soldier or military using it in their advertisement.
@sullivanrachael
17 күн бұрын
@@DurzoBlunts- well, the private world of protection might well make use of these ruggedised lithium batteries. Anything for sales. Can’t say I’d lust after huge battery packs to keep my EV off-roader charged up in the event of a power cut. But some might. Let them!
Thank you
My radio has a hand crank to power it, why not have hand cranks fitted as standard. Saves Electric and gives the troops a work out every two miles. The M.O.D. must be Nuts.
@timsmith2525
17 күн бұрын
Those things already exist: They're called "bicycles".
Another thing - especially with aircraft is that the fuel tank gets lighter as the aircraft flies... This does not happen with a battery... The safe landing weight of a larger aircraft is also a lot less than its max take-off weight,
@Audioremedy0785
14 күн бұрын
Why is that relevant? It only impacts landing calculations. An aircraft that’s full of fuel (or cargo) is perfectly safe to land. The only reason they dump fuel is because the horrific consequences of lighting a full fuel tank when they know it’s going to be a rough landing.
@chrissmith2114
14 күн бұрын
@@Audioremedy0785 WRONG, the lower landing weight is to protect the landing gear and tyres....
@Audioremedy0785
14 күн бұрын
@@chrissmith2114 In some instances that’s true. However most planes don’t have the capacity to dump fuel so would have to land in an emergency with full fuel. It’s a mute argument anyway as this really is a convo about vehicles. I think we are a very long way from electric planes being any more than an experiment. But when we run out of fuel it will be a case of finding the best alternative.
Simon, At least with the Glove Box light on you would be able to read the fine print on your Hertz EV contract 🙂
Oh my. How hilarious. A portable EV battery that still takes how long to unload in to the car.
That has got to be the best so far🤣🤣
I just see the soldiers in back using them to power their gaming laptop and when things break down its been tapped dry. That and the enemies targeting them in hopes of setting off a fire.
But . . . but . . . but . . . if you wrap the "electric jerrycan" in a wet towel it puts out 60X the energy that it stores and recharges in 5 minutes, from overnight solar.
@johns2226
17 күн бұрын
😂😂✔👍
@robertkubrick3738
17 күн бұрын
Actually you are supposed to cool them by continuous streams of urine.
The “electric Jerrycan” is a rechargeable battery, folks. It doesn’t need a new name.
@countryjoe3551
17 күн бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ahh the glove box - where you keep your string back tan leather driving gloves, travel sweets, torch and map - happy days.
You just need to throw away all the science and BELIEVE! Knowing things clouds your creativity, man! /s
I really want to see an electric tank and I don't mean diesel powered generator running electric motors.
i want it to power my tent when i go camping...altho having a normal can and making another one thats a small gas generator would be fun to have
I used to have a jumpstart kit for a car. That thing weighed like 20lbs and took hours to charge, all it did was provide enough power for a car to turn over if the battery was dead lol.
The tow truck said it would take 2 hours, so the Electric Jerry Can gives just enough juice to power your interior lights, so you can find your heavy jacket in the backseat. 😂
Electric Jerry can: for people who think that putting a solar panel (of well under a square meter) atop an electric or hybrid car is brilliant.
In a 20l diesel you have 200kwh @30% efficiency that is 66.(6) usable kwh. Basically what u get in 333 KG battery with 100% efficiency. So ... Wake me up when batteries become 1 order of magnitude more energy dense!
The demonstration that we are not at all ready for this electrical transition also resides in the fact that we continue to consider electricity as a "transportable product". As if it were a liter of petrol or a kilogram of sand.
Actually, using one of these 'Boosters' can invalidate your EV warranty, someone I know of was told that by the EV dealer.
I'm going to buy one for my laptop
"defence applications" --> HAAAHAHAHAHAHHA AHAHAAAHAHAHA HAAAAAAHAHA. EVs are just what you need in defence, amiright?!
100% on the energy density of petrol and jet fuel vs batteries. Bonus for planes they get lighter and more efficient as they burn that jet fuel too.
The e-Panther tank. Eco friendly destroyer of everything in its path, there ya go!!
Fuel cells could solve the problem, but when they tried some methanol-based prototypes 20 years or so ago, they were a) unreliable because of membrane issues, b) as efficient as gasoline engines back then, which means way less efficient than modern ICEs.
Exactly Simon... I ran that math a few years ago to make the point about the fantasy of electric aircraft that many in aviation seem to believe are the future
@ghunt9146
17 күн бұрын
They probably think that you just pop two AA batteries in the fuselage. Simple, no?
@starpawsy
17 күн бұрын
Your ABC told us last week that we would be flying in (small) battery electric aircraft "as early as next year". But to be fair, in the same story they told us that battery electric airliners are "a little further away". THe most frightening thing is that there are a couple of million people here who still believe everything Your ABC says.
@jackoneil3933
17 күн бұрын
@@starpawsy Of course it's all about face time with the Industrial Media Complex. Having grown up on an airport and had some first-hand experience with aircraft certification, and seeing a friend burn millions with the FAA before he even had a flying prototype of a conventional light aircraft Burt Rutan spent a lot of time and money designing and test flying, certifying a conventional light electric aircraft, much less an electric VTOL or Part 121 (air transport) aircraft would cost more millions than most realize. Even Elon Musk said "If you want a flying car, buy a helicopter". And with current laws in most countries, you can't just operate a VTOL aircraft anywhere. In the U.S. you are pretty much limited to airports waterways aircraft and seaplanes are limited to. You can make a very limited number off airport landings on your personal property or a property you have permission to land in a year but to do routine operations you have to have an approved heliport, and if the neighbors complain or the FAA, city or county says NO, you don't get your heliport approved.
@jackoneil3933
17 күн бұрын
@@starpawsy When I lived in Australia many years ago, and was stunned by the overt lies and propaganda the ABC disseminated. Only now have I seen anything on par with the ABC back then. At the height of he AIDS drama, the ABC pumped a headline story "68% of American Men are now infected with the AIDS Virus!" My girlfriend disowned me, most of my Aussie friends stopped associating with me, and the couple who would asked if I a recent AIDS test and what a tragedy it was that half of American men would be dead in a few years.
@jackoneil3933
17 күн бұрын
@@starpawsy When I lived in Australia many years ago, and was stunned by the overt lies and propaganda the ABC disseminated. Only now have I seen anything on par with the ABC back then. At the height of he AIDS drama, the ABC pumped a headline story "68% of American Men are now infected with the HlV Virus!" My girlfriend disowned me, most of my Aussie friends stopped associating with me, and the couple who would asked if I a recent AIDS test and what a tragedy it was that half of American men would be dead in a few years.
I see all the EVangleists talk about how much more likely an ICE vehicle is to catch on fire, but I don't see any specific rules about them parking anywhere they want, unlike EV's. I am 73 and can count the number of normal vehicles I have seen on fire on one hand. One of them was a pickup I owned. My wife was driving it, and she saw some flames coming out from under the hood and poured some soda pop on it, that's what she had available and put it out. Some insulation on a wire had overheated and caught fire. She drove home, and I replaced the wire. No damage done, other than the wire.
@genxray951
17 күн бұрын
when an ICE care does catch on fire, the fire department can put it out, when an EV catches on fire the fire department can only try to cool everything around it so it doesn't melt or catch everything on fire. they can't actually put it out. it's like a solid rocket booster.
That inefficiency in gasoline engines is very useful for heating in our cold Canadian winters, whereas in an EV, you don't have that spare energy to begin with.
The number one priority of any company trying to develop EVs of any kind must be the search for a new generation of battery tech. Lithium (certainly in it's present battery tech) is simply not adequate for any EV beyond a vehicle used for local deliveries / commuting only. Unless a company is being told to do this, it's just a way for them to spend/earn money for whistling in the wind...
Instead of “Medic!”, soldiers will be “Charger, I need a charger here!”. I can see the diverse “Charging Battalion” running all over the battlefield with their portable batteries.
Jerry here, also an air return to reduce splash. Those 3 handles? Yep, there's a reason. One man can carry one using the middle handle. A line of soldiers can carry jerry cans BETWEEN them, with the dege handles. The bloke on each end draws the short straw and carries one himself, with the free hand for ballast. Stable, Speedy Like your channel, mate. Pommyland's LOSS is our GAIN ...
What they're not saying is that you need a tractor/trailer full of them to recharge 10 troupe transports! Then there's the BFDG that recharges all the little briefcases. The only drawback is you have to remove the induvial packs from the trailer to allow the heat from recharging to dissipate because you wouldn't want the batteries to go into thermal runaway and give up you position.
BOONDOGGLE SPOTTED!😂
Well put
This battery would have a military application though. Drive a nail through it and you have an unextinguishable incendiary device.
"Air engines" that blew my mind love the channel.
How dare you spoil my electric utopia dreams
4:39 Electric drivetrains already exist and are moving heavy freight. It is a diesel-electric locomotive. In fact, most locomotives are diesel-electric.
Hold on, hold on! My tank needs a charge..... yer right!
Sounds like a great idea for rapid charging of equipment such as drones which need to be deployed quickly and often.
Who needs a jerrycan? A few years from now, V2V will likely be standard on new EVs. Use a V2V cable to transfer enough kWh to reach the next charger from a vehicle with plenty of spare capacity to the stranded EV. You can already sort of do this as long as the source vehicle has V2L, though many of those vehicles only have 1-2kW of AC output which is impractically slow. With V2V, you can easily do 50+kW (70A at 720V) and be done in a few minutes on the same weight budget as set of decent 12V booster cables.
I think it's a great idea, it's going to lead to less wars, imagine the commander telling the troops "we're going to raid them at sun up", corporal says, "can we make it late afternoon the batteries aren't charged enough to get all the way there, it's been a bit cloudy".
As a military retiree, I'm curious, when we deploy, how many C-17/C-130's are to be needed to transport all these 'Ruggedised scalable power units', (in a modular fashion, of course) in a low cabin pressure environment at 30,000 feet. Their cell density and mass puts them right up there with an M1A1 Abrams, and we can only fly one of those on a big plane. These cells have to get to the front lines, somehow, along with all the diesel generators (and fuel) to keep them charged. OR will we need a new global Geneva Convention agreement that solar cells and windmills are as protected as Red Cross vehicles, and not to be targeted.
Reminds me of the old Volkswagens. They had no gas gauge. You ran out of gas, you turn a knob and you had a gallon of gas to get to a station. Cut cut off a quarter of the battery to be turned on when you run out of power.
I have five "Gerry cans" sitting in my garage, because I have a truck, a Jeep, a lawnmower, a couple generators all that provide power to live each and every day. When each can is empty, it's practically weightless compared to "full", while batteries are just as heavy to carry "empty" as they are charged. The major mass of any "fueled vehicle" is 95% active frame, body, powertrain and suspention structure, while the major mass of the EV is "the battery pack", which is almost exactly the same, full or "empty". This doesn't even account for the fact it takes mere minutes to refuel the fueled car, and all the "electric Jerry can" is capable of supplying is the tiny percentage of "electric energy" it's fifty kilos of battery can hold, while demanding precisely the same charge time as the car itself demands. Simply get in a conventional vehicle and drive five hundred bucks worth of fuel and compare it to the EV drive of "five hundred bucks worth of charge" and count the miles behind, "the time on the road and the convenience that arrives each day "when charging the vehicle and it's "spare battery charges" one can actually carry with, going away from "charging stations" either at home, or along the way.
Very excellent jerrycan science MGUY, that can't be beaten.
Efficiency factor caparing petrol vs electric is about 3 to 1. Your asumption of 40%, 1/0,4=2,5, is slighty to good for petrol. The rest of your vid is spot on, bravo. The main disadvantage of "electrc jerry can" is that batteries tend to discharge themself after a few days sitting idle. A petrol jerry can stores fuel for years, no "phantom" losses here to see. Weight/energy is key in mobile applications. Not just in Formula 1 cars, every gramm counts. In everyday regular folks car usage, weight matters a lot too. EV's weigh 400-500 kg more than regular cars. No way, not even in 20 years, likely never, will an EV be able to compete in the weight/energy ratio.
@xiangkunwan
17 күн бұрын
no "phantom" losses? there actually are "phantom" losses in gaslione due to oxidation and evaporation. "pure gas begins to degrade and lose its combustibility as a result of oxidation and evaporation in three to six months if stored in a sealed and labelled metal or plastic container. Ethanol-gasoline blends have a shorter shelf life of two to three months."
One correction related to your jet fuel comment. I have an airplane that runs on 100 Low-Lead gasoline as most 1 to 6 passenger planes do, and another airplane that runs on 91 octane pump gas as many 1 and 2 passenger Light Sport airplanes do. The first plane weighs 2,100 LB fully-loaded with 2 people. It will cruise at 200 MPH burning 11 GPH. It has 210 HP and runs on 100 Low-Lead fuel available at virtually all US airports. The lighter plane weighs 1,220 LB fully-loaded with 2 people. Its 100 HP engine will cruise at 122 MPH burning 6 GPH of 91 octane automobile gas.
Even better than petrol/gasoline is E85 (flex fuel) consisting of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. It produces more power and much less harmful emissions than regular gasoline and is 25% cheaper than regular gasoline. All Ford EcoBoost and PowerBoost (hybrid) engines can use E85. The best solution for a powerplant that is currently available on the market is Ford's 3.5l PowerBoost engine available on Ford F-150 hybrid truck. At 5700 pounds, F-150 PowerBoost has an average 24/24/24 city/highway/combined US MPG (it should be close to 30 UK MPG), and when driven gently, can get up to 35 US MPG in the city!
Enjoying the additional new content to your channel Simon.
I bought 1kW powerstation for the outdoors. It doesn't last much, but the great thing about it is you can quickly recharge it with diesel generator for pennies.
I wrote this in a comment to someone saying to me they know friends who havnt had any issues finding charge stations in Australia . I said all that proves is they are well organised and plan ahead and went on to say you can’t go for a drive and just hope to find one down the road if you’re running low. I finished off with the “jerry can” example. I was originally going to use 50kg as that’s what came to mind but shaved 20kg off for the sake of the other party’s sanity and mine. “As far as i know you cant rock up to a charge station and fill up a portable electricity receptacle (battery) if you go flat or break down in the middle of know here. Even if you could buy portable plug in batteries they’d weight a ton. A 30kg battery might get you 50km so definitely not practical or economical because carrying that extra 30kg drains a lo of that 50km of charge so it’s pointless.”