► More Military videos on: kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZmqGm9qQgaqofbA.html&ab_channel=QUASAREntertainment

AS21 Redbacks

The CV90 120 with it's 120mm main gun can even support main battle tanks. Very versatile

@DarkHorseSki

Жыл бұрын

The Lynx has demonstrated a much better working version with their KF120 version of the vehicle.

The Cv 90 rules them all...

CV90 Wins hands down.

@Yuki_Ika7

Жыл бұрын

Agreed, best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, etc.

@DarkHorseSki

Жыл бұрын

Nope. KF41 does everything the CV90 does but even better.

@tomeng9520

Жыл бұрын

@@DarkHorseSki CV90 best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, the 40mm cannon is a beast, etc.

@DarkHorseSki

Жыл бұрын

@@tomeng9520 The KF41 is designed, from the start to be even more modular and customizable. And there are versions of the KF41 mounting the 50mm beast (check out the OMFV submission), and Rheinmetall has a long record of combat proven vehicles. And, cost for the KF41 is significantly less. Lynx is a better vehicle (by just a bit) at a much better cost (by quite a bit.) This very channel made note of that when it talked about the LAND 400 competition in Australia (within the last couple of years.)

@opponenspericulo

Жыл бұрын

Yup, CV90's the way to go, those not seeing that, I pity.

Soon, there may be two different IFVs in Poland, claiming to be the best in their class in the world. The light BORSUK IFV and the heavy PL-21 IFV based on the AS-21 REDBACK IFV. While Borsuk is already starting to be produced, PL-21 is being negotiated as to what it will look like as a final product. The Borsuk IFV was designed with the terrain in mind. More precisely, it is about overcoming various water sewage, which is why it is a light IFV. The PL-21, on the other hand, may consist of: 1) a chassis fitted with the K9 Thunder and AHS Krab cannon-howitzers. 2) ZSSW-30 unmanned turret ( Borsuk has one). 3) IronVision system. 4) IronFist system. 5) Topaz system. 6) the armor remains the same as on the Redback. 7) hybrid engine

@ericb.4358

Жыл бұрын

A HYBRID ENGINE will become "standard" equipment on many new IFVs - if militaries are smart!

K 21 very impressive and closer to the needs of an ifv! In the rest of cv 90 you have to stop shooting?! 🤨 Puma the other day a fell all the army tests!😌Lynx e ifv or tank, 44 tons 😏!

I think Australia's new ifv Are definitely up their with the best they both look as good as one another I'd go with the redback

Where is Redback ?

How can Puma be number 1? It failed in 18 tests

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

no it was 18 vehicle breakdowns during a training excercise. This was due to thee poor maintenance conditiion of the vehicles, wich had been submitted to extensive combat training and excercises in the weeks/months preceeding the incident without the required maintenance applied to them at the neccesary intervall.

What to your video you made and ranked SABRAH no 2?

Claims that only will show IFVs that arr already in production... Proceeds to show russian IFV that is still in testing and who knows when will see production if ever. BTW Ukranie has BMP4 in production for years, and it has proven it self on battlefield.

Топ ваш фигня, пока эти машины не испытаются в реальном бою, а не на полигоне)

Why even mention CV90's first 1993 specs, when they are since long replaced w the latest stabilisers, optics & thermal imaging, even devices to mask appearance on the battlefield, such as the 'Ghost model' of CV90? Newer isn't always better, as we've seen w the Lynx/Puma, is what upgrades can provide for a good platform. And w 17 models of CV90, the swedes sure showed how it should be done.

@jonny2954

Жыл бұрын

-Armor, armament, FCS and optronics can be replaced in an upgrade. -Base hull structure and layout can not. If build to the exact same specs a new clean sheet design will always outperform a upgraded legacy platform.

@opponenspericulo

Жыл бұрын

@@jonny2954 Not necessarily; the whole hull, turret, has been changed between different models of CV90. The models can be rebuilt like Lego; front, sides, top and back, including turret (or no turret), tracks25-120mm gun with adapter chassi for it, and number of drivewheels. It's about as modular as a vehicle can get. I'm sure you want a jet turbine engine it could be done too.

@jonny2954

Жыл бұрын

@@opponenspericulo The nature of the base hull remained the same since the Mk I. The rear dismount compartment roof has been raised among other changes, however the thickness or material of the steel armor hull has not been changed to allow a better weight-protection ratio for the usage of addon composite armor. New clean sheet design armored vehicles use the steel hull mostly (or in some cases only) for structural purposes, the ballistic protection is provided by composite armor. Modern composite armor has a 4+ times higher weight efficency than steel against KE and more than 8+ times against shaped charges. By reducing the amount of steel and maximising the amount of composite armor in a passive protection concept weight-protection ratio is boosted significantly. For every 100 kg of steel saved there can be 100 kg of composite which has the ballistic protection performance of 400+ kg of steel (against KE, against SC it's 800+ kg of steel!). Disadvantage being higher cost and volume of course (the reason for more modern IFVs being so much bigger from the outside despite having similar internal volume). The latest CV90 Mk IV still uses a steel armor hull made of the same material and of the same thickness as the Mk I. There has been composite addon armor added on top, but due to the high weight of the hull it's not nearly as much as modern designs like the Lynx or Redback manage. The Puma as example takes that principle to a whole different level, more than half of its total combat weight is composite armor.

The Bradley COULD have its life extended with the addition of a 50 mm cannon and a 6.5 mm machine gun (using 80,000 psi combat velocity ammo). Likingthat Swedish CV-90 and that 40 mm cannon.

@DarkHorseSki

Жыл бұрын

The US version of the OMFV (whichever it turns out to be among the candidates) will have the 50mm gun.

It is a strange tradition of Nato countries to put German tanks or AFV to the 1st place. It is not field proven. Just send them to Ukraine battle field and you will see that it is not more efficient than other AFV.

@jonny2954

4 ай бұрын

The armor is kinda proven bozo, it literally has the same roof armor as the PZH 2000 which took a Lancet hit to the roof and didn't penetrate.

Indonesia should be able to make IFV like these, hopefully in the future Indonesia will make its own IFV. .. 😁

Tandem charge defeats slat armour. They defeat single charge rounds like old RPG rounds. Javelin goes through it like its nothing.

AS21 REDBACK?????

Nên có thông số cơ bản:khối lượng,công suất,.v..v...

Jep the Puma is the "best" in failing & being a billion Euro grave. BTW where is the BORSUK IFV ?

@ArmyEncyclopedia

Жыл бұрын

The BORSUK IFV is still being tested.

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

in comparison to Borsuk, Puma has significantly heavier armor protection and more advanced weapon systems. Also Puma is in production and service, while Borsuk has a single Prototype produced.

@quigonjinn3567

Жыл бұрын

​@@zhufortheimpaler4041 You should really read about the Borsuk & Puma because you got no clue what ur writing about. Holy cow where to start... The Bursuk IFV is not 1 version but a modular plattform UMPG (Uniwersalna Modułowa Platforma Gąsienicowa) for example more composite armour can be fittet BUT doing so results in a 44t vehicle loosing its amphibious ablity. A Borsuk base model only weighs 28t. While the Puma protecton lvl A weighs 31,5t BTW 5 Borsuk have been build. The prototype test phase was completed in late 2022 & the Polish army was finally satisfied with the changes made. Thus the Polish goverment ordered this FEBRUARY 1400 Borsuk. While the German GOV is WAS planing to get max 350 Pumas in TOTAL. The Puma has a traditional Continuous track while the Bursuk is using a modern & lighter & much quieter CRT (Composite rubber track) Further more the Borsuk has a hard kill APS while the Puma has only a passive one. Thats a huge deal. Borsuk's main armarment is a Mk44 Bushmaster II, this cannon has higher firerate that Pumas MK 30-2/ABM even tho both use the exact same caliber. Both IFV use also the same Israeli Spike ATGM's. The Puma can only hold 200 rounds of cannon ammo in it turret & CANNOT be rearmed from within the Puma, this is another a fatal flaw. Because labour & materials are way cheaper in Poland the Borsuk cost 10 million USD & the Puma a wopping 17 million USD ( the most expensive IFV on this planet). Both have cameras instead of pericopes. The Pumas are infact so advanced that during the lastest Bundeswehr training exercise in 2022 ALL 18 Pumas broke down.... All further production of the Puma IFV thus have been halted. Now germany wants to pull out their phased out Marder IFV again... This was just another massive scandal in Germany & every body is blaming the other why it went so terribly wrong. I could go on & on but im tires of correcting people all the time for brabbling out nonsense.

@quigonjinn3567

Жыл бұрын

@@ArmyEncyclopedia The Polish GOV just ordered 1400 Bursuk IFV in Feburary this year. Also why didn't you mention that during the lastest training exercise of the Bundeswehr, all 18 of the "Worlds best IFV" Puma broke down & all further production has been canceled? That was last year. Look it up, this Puma scandal was even News in Switzerland.

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

@@quigonjinn3567 the Pumas broke down due to lack of maintenance after serveral weeks of heavy combat training prior to that excercise. only one of the problems was severe enough that minor maintenance wouldnt have prevented it. Germany wanted to procure 750 Puma´s, the number was reduced to 350, but currently another 150 are on order. Production was continued months ago. And still Borsuk has ZERO Produced numbers right now and just a handfull of pre production prototypes.

Kurganets-25 (Russia) Paper😉

Correct . Leopold Tank were destroyed in Ukraine 3:21 by Russian Lancet Missile.Although German MBT Leopold was considered one to be #1 .

@jonny2954

4 ай бұрын

It's still considered #1. Ukraine losses even supported that because the vast majority of crews dismounted unharmed after being hit.

These are nothing a javelin couldn't handle.

@Greekmilsim

Жыл бұрын

Ignorant .Modern ifvs have trophy system

@ekarus4360

Жыл бұрын

modern tanks and ifvs have defeans system capably to destroy incoming antitank missles

@Greekmilsim

Жыл бұрын

@@ekarus4360 and HEAT rounds

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

Puma has an active protection system fitted to defeat Missiles like Javelin. Its called MUSS.

@Greekmilsim

Жыл бұрын

@@zhufortheimpaler4041 they cannot defeat a top attack

CV 90 FTW!!!!

Puma n01......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Where is the IDF Namer?

4:38 this one is disgustingly strong in A.W.

I Like ASCOD from Spain (Pizarro) and Lynx.

No Namer ? The only IFV with APS.

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

Puma has also MUSS APS

PL-01 CONCEPT

this is why they say youtube is misinforming...you forgot the best one rebback the one one that beat lynx in the lamd 400 challenge,,,,

CV90 cant withstand 30mm AP rounds. But it can withstand a 20kg mine.

PL-01 CONCEPT. Where is?

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

as it says in its name: concept. Not even prototype vehicles availible

🔴 I think it depends on the crew's training. I think it doesn't matter what IFV it is. You have to get the most out of your device. Above all, you have to master the electronics on board.- With no infantry to accompany you, you'll be quickly shot down with a bazooka.

German army has 18 PUMAs, but not one is operative

@BartoszFalkowski

Жыл бұрын

Not really. These 18 Pumas that broke were just assigned for the NATO' s VJTF (fast reaction forces). So not all they have in total :-) 350 were delivered, probably. However, they say Pumas have issus since beginning. They adopted them in 2015 and allegedely only in 2017 they were regarded as fight ready. But they have constant issues with them

@Cemm1905

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

@@BartoszFalkowski those problems are primarily maintenance related. The CDU Govrnment cut basicly all maintenance capability of the Bundeswehr in 2010 and since then the Bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates etc

puma have so many mechanical faults, loads of them are not combat operational and have a heavy maintance cost

@jonny2954

4 ай бұрын

Your information is from about 2 years ago lol

Bradley at number 6 is joke😂😂

Volvo 740

为啥人家的迷彩都很好看，墙国的迷彩和塑料玩具一样，土

Borsuk? Where is?

@seafirst1

Жыл бұрын

Borsuk? never tested in the field. funny polish.

@lukaskania6879

Жыл бұрын

@@seafirst1 But Rheinmetall didn't show off in Australia 😂 and Korean crap didn't pass tests in Poland. The turret from the Romans is disastrous, not to mention the chassis.

불량품이 일위네....

Puma ? 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 PUMA IS ALWAYS BROKEN IS THIS A JOKE ? 😂😂🤣BEST IS TURKEY AND SOUTH KOREA👍💪

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

not really. puma´s readiiness problems primarily come from lack of proper high level maintenance. The Bundeswehr lost the majority of their own maintenance units and capability in 2010 with the MOD cutting these parts to save money in the Budget. Since then the bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates. 95% of issues with Puma are due to lack of maintenance and too high usage. The "famous" broken down 18 vehicles at the start of the year were used in heavy combat training for weeks without major maintenance and overhaul as part of the VJTF training and qualification prior to the relevant event.

god this voice is worse than the tiktok one

@luthfihar3211

2 жыл бұрын

hot garbage use of decent TTS imo

T15 Armata

Puma better than lynx 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

Lynx is based on Puma Technology. Puma is a joint venture between KMW and Rheinmetall, Lynx only uses the Rheinmetall components of the Puma developement. It is designed to be less sofisticated and complex and thus cheaper to produce and be more customizable for international customers.

@Greekmilsim

Жыл бұрын

@@zhufortheimpaler4041 i prefer lynx

@zhufortheimpaler4041

Жыл бұрын

@@Greekmilsim fair enough. But keep in mind that lynx didnt really have time to mature. It will get its first year of service this year and we can bet on it that alot of teething issues will surface that have been ironed out on Puma already. Most AFV´s have teething problems in their first few years of service. Those show up as the fleet of in service vehicles gets larger and the sample size increases.

email me if u want to get educated in ifvs lmfao.. you must be german. reinmetal has not been the top for a bit now ...its like china saying they have the best stealth fighters.....lol

Ales schön und gut, aber wo her nimmt ihr die, Schwach sehnigen Preise? Wie auch in den anderen Videos who ein Italienischer 8×8Viachel angeblich über 10.000.000 Millionen kosten soll? Über Prüfen Sie ihre Quellen bevor sie falsch Info verbreiten.

@ArmyEncyclopedia

Жыл бұрын

According to the program for the purchase of armored vehicles 381 infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) Freccia will be purchased, co-produced by the Italian consortium Conzorzio Iveco Oto Melara. The cost of this equipment is about € 2,65 bn (USD 4.02 billion), the purchase will be carried out until 2024. 4,020,000,000$/381=10,551,181$

Гавно эти ваши БМП в бою надо их проверить а не на полигонах

AS21 Redbacks