The Type 055 is the most heavily armed ship in the world because the VLS launch cells are so large that 4 medium range anti-air missiles can be crammed into one cell. This allows the Type 055 to carry more missiles of all types than any other ship in the world today.

@zetareticulan321

Жыл бұрын

Love reading your comments on Quora, Felix.

@felixsu375

Жыл бұрын

@@zetareticulan321 For some strange reason people think I am a Chinese nationalist. All I'm doing is just providing reasonable analysis on the military situation in the Western Pacific from an Army vet. It shocks me how much my fellow Americans hate facts. It's not as if if everyone pretends the Emperor is wearing cloths, he is suddenly going to have cloths on. If the Emperor is naked then he is naked. What is the point of lying to yourself?

@jensensean7118

Жыл бұрын

90% correct. However, the anti-air and ant--ballistic missiles of the US are still more diverse in types and more efficient and proven in action. Chinese and Russian missiles suffer from using metal casing and shells rather than composite materials, so they are quite bulky and heavy. These will change in time, I hope. But much lower costs and higher volume of production in CHina may be a more important factor.

@captainbroady

Жыл бұрын

@@felixsu375 well it depends on whether you exaggerate facts and/or theories to favour a specific side

@zetareticulan321

Жыл бұрын

@Felix Su They're afraid of the truth because it destroys their belief that they are somehow exceptional and superior to the Chinese.

It's worth mentionin that Horizon and Typ45 have smaller cells than avarge and 052/055 bigger. The pure number of cells is misleading especially considering euro cells can't quadpack.

The 054B frigate now being built to be equipped with new gen HQ-61FE with 160km range will be quite comparable to the Horizon class destroyer.

@simonyip5978

Жыл бұрын

Do you mean the HQ-16 (not the HQ-61)?

@JD-dm1uj

Жыл бұрын

@@simonyip5978 yes, it’s the HQ-16F

@saml7610

Жыл бұрын

@@JD-dm1uj why would the domestic version utilize the export variant of the missile? I'd expect regular HQ-16F, not the somewhat less capable FE variant. I'm also a bit surprised they're not just going with those new smaller missiles for the HQ-9B system (I forgot the model number for the missiles themselves, but they were displayed at Zuhai 2022.) Unless they can double pack the HQ-16's on top of the other in each cell, I'm not sure what the benefit would be, since the missile is much shorter and would waste space in the magazine relative to the capability it offers.

@JD-dm1uj

Жыл бұрын

@@saml7610 It won’t, my bad for putting the E (export).

@nostradamus2642

Жыл бұрын

@@simonyip5978 Typo

Great analysis and not a single dislike so far 🙌🙌🙌

Good content. As always. Your content is objective and unbiased.

The video forgets to mention that the type 055 has the most advanced radar system. It might be the only one which is equipped with S-X dual band rabar if I am not mistaken.

@user-hd7np1du6p

Жыл бұрын

055，只是渔船改装的，挖了几个孔……

@pizzamonster8216

Жыл бұрын

​@@user-hd7np1du6p好似你個臭西老母日夜不分被契家佬左又掘，右又掘😅

@user-el1cx7gi6p

Жыл бұрын

你说的没错，055不值一提。 都是大鱼船 大货船改的。 我还是希望台湾早一步光复大陆。

@user-yd5we5cj8e

Жыл бұрын

全是友军

@xiangsong901

Жыл бұрын

055只是我们共产党造出来骗人的，都是纸片粘贴的手工艺品

I truly appreciate the fact that you keep up the description and the vessels hard specs.

Great comparision video.

I like your channel. and comments are fact based, and polite.

055 and 052d uses the same VLS cells, so the YJ21 would also work on the 052d, as both yj18 and yj21 uses the 9m deep version of the GJB 5860-2006 VLS system

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

It's fair deduction, although I am not aware of any footages of the Type 052D using the YJ-21 yet, so I don't want to be definitive

@Ebrasin

Жыл бұрын

The 850mm VLS is called HT-1

@leiyue1411

Жыл бұрын

052d's front VLS cells are smaller than those in the middle.

Great Video

good list 👍

100% Agree 👍 good 👍 job 👍 👏

Is it possible to explain basis of this ranking?? Apart from number of VLS cells.. What about Overall stealth feature or radar range or ability to tackle submarine attacks..

quite fair narrative

I agree with the top 3 rankings, but I'm not sure if Japanese Maya or Atago is better than the newest type 52Ds, with the latest Chinese missiles and AESA radars. I think Chinese anti ship missiles are better, Japan is still using sea sparrows and type 17/90 anti ship missiles. Most likely japan and hsa won't be able to keep up with Chinese sensors or missile developments(quality) and quantity of missions and ships. That's not even mentionidng the number of ships in class, China has like 25 type 52D and 8-16 type 55, while Japan has like 2 atago and 2 maya. Not even mentioning the huge numbers of other ships and submarines. But other than that which is a minor thing and which I could very well be incorrect about, the rankings were decent. Oh yeah, I also do jot trust Indias domestic equipment and their reporting on it whatsoever. They always have problems, always lie and make excuses, so I don't trust them. It's standard for them to over promise, go over budget, years past deadline, and in the end the project is cancelled or they produce a fsr inferior outcome than what they've been showing off and claiming they will have.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

It's a fair question. The rankings are always subjective. My view on the Maya and Atago is based on their improved AEGIS baseline 9C, a much larger number of VLS cells than the 052D, a very capable ASW helo in the Seahawk, and in the future the SM-6 induction for the Maya.

@jagodiving

Жыл бұрын

India often use israeli technology in their ship radars and missile, and actually israel's radar technology more advance than type 052 currently using

@VivekSingh-fb8vp

Жыл бұрын

Shut up idt

@ChrisZ901

Жыл бұрын

There are only 8 055. the 8th one was launched recently and it was deemed a big milestone for the Chinese navy by the state media. There might be another batch in plan though

@khanhtran-ce7fi

Жыл бұрын

Since when can the ships of the Chinese communists be rated better than those of the US and Japan? Can the numbers given by the communists be reliable? you believe a bunch of thieves?

Muy buen video, con excelentes imagenes e informacion. 👏👏👏👏👍

Glad you omitted Zumwalt from the list.

Yup the type 055 deserved the top spot. That is one heavily packed destroyer with now even hypersonic missile YJ21 in service.

@rohitb5834

Жыл бұрын

there arent "Flaws". Just because a better ship comes up doesn mean the previous ship had "flaws".

Please do Frigates as well

I like to watch your channel your content is very objective. I would like to see the top ten frigates in the world, the top ten conventional submarines in the world, and the top ten LHDs in the world.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Thanks friend. Suggestions noted

Awesome compilation, completely agree with your rankings, some would list the STG over the 055, to me, definitely not the case. It’s nowhere near as flexible and falls short on sensors and the quality of 055’s munitions will best the quantity of what STG offers. So glad you didn’t have the Zumwalt listed, falling for the hype of it, haha.

@felixsu375

Жыл бұрын

Also the Type 055 has more missiles dues to the size of the cells allowing 4 medium range anti-air missiles per cell. If they go up against each other, the Type 055 would win hands down.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Thanks JD. I really like the look of the STG class - very long and smooth, a more handsome cousin of the Arleigh Burke

@JD-dm1uj

Жыл бұрын

@@EurasiaNaval Absolutely, always thought the same, beautifully designed ship.

@chika5361

Ай бұрын

世宗大王號非常過時，並且他們一直沒有解決雷達相互干擾的問題，考慮到韓國人比中國人更加喜歡吹噓，所以我認為世宗大王號甚至不如伯克級

I suspect that when shooting starts, the VLS count is going to be deciding factor in combat. The first to run out of missiles will be the first to lose.

We use for defense not for invasion and bullying others.

@NA-di1oe

3 ай бұрын

US and some western countries bully only small and poor country 😅

Type 55 is the finest. It will only be surpass by another larger PLA Destroyer in the future.

@Eric-ge5le

Жыл бұрын

type057 电磁炮+全电推进

@user-nz2fj6gg9u

11 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

The Chinese 055 looks awsome🤩

Interesting video, and nice to see a ranking that doesn't put the Arleigh Burke on top for once XD. I would have liked to see a little bit more explanation for why you placed them as you did in the ranking, saying why you think one is better than the other, but other than that it was a good watch. Maybe you could rank frigates or corvettes next?

@rohitb5834

Жыл бұрын

there are nothing called "flaws". its just upgrades. a new generation warship comes out doesn mean the previous generation had "flaws".

@kapitankapital6580

Жыл бұрын

@@rohitb5834 ?

@rohitb5834

Жыл бұрын

@@kapitankapital6580 oops, wrong comment

Horizon and type 45 can't quad pack right? I don't really know if it can be put above Hobart.

@Dekever

Жыл бұрын

Sylver a50 and a70 cannot quadpack. They can, but was never done by France Italy or UK, pack 2 CAMM or CAMM-ER missiles in a Cell. It was never done because, apparently, their navies prefer to have an Aster missile than 2 CAMM. Even the Italian PPAs were equipped only with Aster-30 missiles...

Comparison videos always draw a lot of attention. It will be interesting reading the comments. While it would have added work, you might have given a 1-10 score for each vessel across the 3 domains of anti-air/surface/sub-surface. Some are very strong in one area, while others might be quite good in all 3. The later Burkes and derivatives (Japan & S.Korea) and the Type 055 are well-rounded in all domains, while the Indian DDGs seem to put proportionately more emphasis on sub-surface warfare.

@abyyy490

Жыл бұрын

The indian systems sucks, it's not stealth but an abomination on stealth designs, just look at the clutter that on top & over, clearly shows poor post management in designing and equipment positioning, secondly most of the crucial components are imported from overseas like from propulsion to the radar and communication, the only Indian in that thing is brahmos but thats too uses Russian components like its engine. Even it's design is somewhat or more similar to French Horizon class destroyers. Well can't put all blame on the shipbuilders since the R&D gets peanuts from the corrupt leadership at the department of defense.... And I'm from India, so yeah..heh

@abyyy490

Жыл бұрын

And the most interesting thing is the interoperability between this ship, the P8 Neptune asw plane and the russian kilo class submarine that india uses sucks, because the use of different comms in use in different vessels. Now they're somehow trying to iron out this issue between P8 Neptune and vishakapatnam by incorporating local made in india systems but again the submarine is being left out and only Navy surface ships uses local comms while both airforce and army uses Israeli and russian systems, which again creates hurdle in combined arms synergy.

@theredbar-cross8515

Жыл бұрын

I think the very fact that the higher end DDGs are good against all target types is what makes them good in the first place. Anti-air or missile defense is an important role, but so is anti-ship. The fact that the US lacks a modern supersonic anti-ship missile is kinda sad. The Harpoon II is just not a competitive missile in this decade.

@surefresh8412

Жыл бұрын

​@@theredbar-cross8515 The U.S. is even going the opposite direction of supersonic. The Navy is working on the VLS version of the LRASM subsonic low-RCS AShM. Also going to procure the Maritime Strike Tomahawk Block V. Shows the doctrinal differences between the U.S. and its adversaries.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I think that's a useful additional content

Very good assessment !

How they can build 8 Type 55 in 4 years is unbelievable. The YJ 21 hypersonic has 10 times of sound speed maximally(3400m in one second)

@user-hd7np1du6p

Жыл бұрын

那就是8艘渔船，挖了几个洞，用来发射导弹，不复杂的。👀

@user-pe7le4th2g

Жыл бұрын

​@@user-hd7np1du6p不不不，虽然挖了一些洞，但都是用来发射YJ21鱼枪的，只不过那种鱼枪飞得比较快😂

@1450nmsl

Жыл бұрын

055 only for fishing

@carlef506

Жыл бұрын

世界%60的民用造船在中国，不过是稍微用了一些民用产能。这远不是真正实力，你可以想象一下战时产能。

@austinlee8809

11 ай бұрын

they can build 10 in one year during war time. you never know.

The age of ship plays a big factor, with latest tech no brainer.

Off topic, but have the CV 16 Liaoning and the CV 17 Shandong carried out any joint training exercises yet? I believe that the carriers and the Type 075 LSH have been seen together, but has anyone seen photos of the carriers together?

@ex0duzz

Жыл бұрын

Nope. I think it is not meant to work together, they are supposed to do their own stuff separately. Like surrounding Taiwan from all directions to do a blockade or other stuff like that. Seeing two carriers in the same one photo would be pure photo ops, even for USA, since they would have to be super close together for that to be possible, and that would only happen if one was leaving dock and other returning or something like that. Otherwise it would also be a danger to the planes flying, taking off and landing etc, and would also make it vulnerable to a big bomb, like one tactical nuke can just take out two carrier groups.

@justsain3236

Жыл бұрын

Why does that matter, both can comminicate with each other. i.e. Ship A works with Ship C AND Ship D works with Ship E Means A, C, D & E can work with each other as they follow same protocols.

Love to see 3 class of destroyers on the JMSDF navy How about the Akizuki class it is still one of the most powerful destroyers in the Japanese Navy

Since the first version of HQ9, the active radar seeker has been used. With AESA, it can obtain much more fire channels than the S300 (Rif) air defense system that uses semi-active radar guidance. Not to mention the naval version HHQ9B used by the 055. In other words, the multi-target engagement capability of the 055 is far stronger than the most advanced warships of the Russian Navy. 055 and Moskva are products of two eras. In addition, 055 is equipped with one of the most advanced shipboard dual-band radars in the world, and her target detection ability is far stronger than that of the sunk Moskva. The 055 also perfectly solves the problem of electromagnetic compatibility, adopts an integrated radio frequency system, and is equipped with a very beautiful stealth mast. She is probably the best warship in the world with integrated electromagnetic systems. This is the invisible part and the most advanced part of 055, unfortunately it is not mentioned in the video. In fact, 16years ago, the Chinese Navy built two destroyers equipped with the Rif air defense system (S300 naval version) purchased from Russia: Type051C, 115 Shenyang and 116 Shijiazhuang, which are deployed in the North Sea Fleet, they are barely seen in China's public reports, proving that they are considered a backward second-line destroyer in the PLAN.

@user-hd7np1du6p

Жыл бұрын

055只是艘大的渔船，挖了几个孔，用来发射导弹。👀

@arthurbanksforbeijingopera3091

5 ай бұрын

Very sorry if you are Rus. Your black sea fleet has been eliminated by Ukraine.

An interesting note to make is the effectiveness of higher VLS counts. Some have argued that beyond a certain point the need for more becomes moot. The Sejong the Great is an example of this in that the newer variants under construction have reduced their VLS count.

@oaao3387

Жыл бұрын

South Korea's new Aegis destroyer reduces the number of cells in large VLS towers, twice the size of existing VLS, and operates a variety of supersonic, hypersonic and ballistic missiles

@panpiper

11 ай бұрын

Have you any links to arguments contending that more VLS become moot at some point? To me it seems obvious that more is always better, if for no other reason than to be able to saturate enemy defenses with offensive missiles or have the ammo to deal with saturation attacks defensively.

@oaao3387

11 ай бұрын

@@panpiper Reducing the number of missiles is not related to the number of missiles, but to the place of residence

@panpiper

11 ай бұрын

@@oaao3387 Huh? Was this intended to mean anything?

@jacobbaumgardner3406

11 ай бұрын

@@panpiper it’s a good question, but no. The Sejong the Great is the most proof I have. Remember that number of VLS cells can still be more if you build more smaller ships. That’s what the PLAN is doing with the Type 052DL. It only has 75 VLS but if you make enough of them you have a similar number of VLS, and they’re more decentralized so if you lose one ship you don’t lose as much capability.

The YJ-21 missile on the Chinese Type-055 is also a hypersonic missile.

@user-yd3mp2xr9v

Жыл бұрын

YJ-21 missile and YJ-20 missile

@m1a2_sepv4_abrams

Жыл бұрын

​@@user-yd3mp2xr9v I can't find any information about YJ-20

@dennisfxd

Жыл бұрын

No, they are not, stop spreading lies. The YJ21 is just an upgraded version of YJ18. -- 战忽局座😊

@stoneedward6446

Жыл бұрын

​@@dennisfxdagree, China currently does not exceed India's conventional missile strength, and South Korea is also very leading in this regard!🤝

@minloongzhao5505

Жыл бұрын

@@dennisfxd 6

a similar list on frigates ? (frigates less than 6k ton displacement)

Comparison between Visakhapatnam class and type 45 class is weird, brahmos and subsonic missiles is inexplicable?

In fact, the Type 052D destroyer as an air defense capital ship plays a huge role in the fleet. It can not only carry a variety of missiles, but most of them are air defense missiles

@user-oi5gh8cj9t

Жыл бұрын

HHQ-9 &HHQ-10? with only two kinds of missile，052d plays a huge role in the fleet as an air defense capital ship ？thats definitely a joke.

@xupaolo3820

Жыл бұрын

@no_name11111yes，Chinese bullets do not kill， enjoy

@yiju8314

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oi5gh8cj9t 052D在航母编队中，确实是防空主力舰……

@user-oi5gh8cj9t

Жыл бұрын

@@yiju8314 那防空手段也太少了，漏洞很大

@rohitb5834

Жыл бұрын

its automated robot voice....

Also can you do top ten best frigates

Kolkata Class is a workhorse but still had some areas to be improved further scheduled updates will be performed on it but all potential areas of flaws were identified and improved via the Vishakhapatnam Class Ship Both are a force to be reckoned with

@eurasianavalinsight love your vids! I do think you forgot the Zumwalt class? I'm not forn the US but I think if they receive there new Ballistic missles, they will be very powerfull :)

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Hey Sam, it's a fair question. Ranking is always quite subjective. If I were to consider only capabilities, Zumwalt would rank fairly well on the list, but from a cost-to-capability standpoint, it is hard to justify ranking it ahead of other ships. For the cost of one Zumwalt, you can buy more than two Burkes, which are individually more capable. That's my reasoning.

@samwouters9984

Жыл бұрын

@@EurasiaNaval Hi, very understandable! I didn't know you were also looking at costs. I do really like your videos, keep up the good work! You're on of the best and most thorough on this ubject ;)

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

@@samwouters9984 Hey Sam, thanks so much for your support!

@allenmoon545

Жыл бұрын

Right . Zumwalt should be top 2.

nice

055 is so beautiful!

@joey3291

7 ай бұрын

it sure is

Realy I like this powerful destroyers

With all this fire power between fawls,war is eminent.

I heard the Chinese 055 destroyer has the hpyersonic anti-ship missile

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

It does.

@joey3291

7 ай бұрын

It does, and so does 052d.

Hobart class= F100 class alvaro de bazan... The original is the Spanish F100, both of Spanish manufacturing, the Australian frigate was called the Horbat class, for Cesar what belongs to Cesar

USS ZUMWALT: Where am I they don’t know my secret weapons

This video is actually genuinely underated and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing

The Turkish TF-2000 destroyer which has 8.500 tonnes of displacement shouldn't have been ignored.

@zongyangli7009

Жыл бұрын

not in service

Voice is a cross between James Earl Ray and Arnold.

should it be call 052DL? following chinese convention it is more reasonable to call it 052DG.

In terms of destroyer fleet strength, there's no doubt the US Navy is the top with near 100 ABs and Ticons. China Type 055 is most powerful because of its radar of x/s band that has some anti-stealth/anti-satellite capability, and hypersonic anti ship ballistic missile YJ-21.

@fatdoi003

Жыл бұрын

Flight 1 of AB and Ticon are obsolete. Their Aegis systems are quite far behind compared to 052d and 055 respectively. Flight 3 is just being introduced but the hull design is getting old ... some questioned the ability of the generators to provide full power to the radars and sensors...

@fatdoi003

11 ай бұрын

@@calebjohnson6423 but the rate of AB replacement cannot be compared to the speed of PLA building their 052D and 055.. in China they have a saying that building warships is like wrapping dumplings and drop them into the water...

@CorePathway

6 ай бұрын

It’s not just the ship, it’s also the crew, operations, communications, mission planning, support, leadership and institutional knowledge. The first time China’s navy conducts a combat mission will be its first.

Agree.

Good videos! Thank you! Btw, that guy sounds like a guy who translated the videos/movies in Russia in the 90's. :-) Only he speaks English. Maybe it's his son...

What's your take on "Not What You Think"s recent video saying hypersonic missiles are pointless?

@nepenthy9804

Жыл бұрын

That channel makes some interesting points, but you can never take his conclusion seriously.

@antaresmc4407

Жыл бұрын

Oversimplified to the point of wrong. NWYT fell on the recent trend that I've noticed of swinging all the way from the "theyre completely unstoppable, turn on a dime and are completely invisible" nonsense to the less stupid but still wrong "they can barely turn, are as visible as BM and just as easy to stop, blind too, useless"...

@antaresmc4407

Жыл бұрын

To explain myself, they are first of all two kinds of weapons: Hypersonic Glide Vehicles and Hypersonic Cruise Missiles: HGV are basically BM that fly low-er- (upper atmo instead of above low orbit) and have lift, thus are hard-er- to see and .-more- maneouverable than the ballistic counterparts; which given they are about as agile and subtle as a brick with a rocket engine, it doesnt mean that much in absolute terms... The HGV is just a ballistic missile warhead that's better across the board but nothing new from a strategic point of view... It does the same job of going big, high and fast, but better (more (not very!) stealthy and maneouverable). By the way, these are the ones which suffer from plasma sheathing, and it's not that big of a deal given that ballistic missiles with terminally guided warheads do exist... HCM are, as the name says, cruise missiles that just go fast. As they go very fast (tho not as fast as HGV or BM), they cant turn as tightly as a slow CM and they must go at relatively high altitude (around the stratosphere) not to heat too much their air breathing engines. Therefore, they bridge the gap between the lightning fast ballistic missiles and the agile, stealthy and flexible cruise missiles, not better than either in their own category. That middle ground of speed and flexibility does open new tactical oportunities, for example time sensitive targets that cant wait an hour for a normal cruise missile and need a bit more subtlety than a ballistic one. HCM wont replace either big and fast BM or slow and nimble CM, but they're to be used alongside them as a weapon to fill that specific niche in the awkward middle between the two.

@FahrurRoziqin

Жыл бұрын

that's channel sucks ngl

HMS Duncan is one of the best

Do you have a video about most advance Electronic Countermeasures on ships?🤔

Number 10...HORIZON class or Fremm adopted and built by the US become the Constellation class and classified as frigates. Its tonnage is about half of that of Burke class.Likewise, the 055 and Se jong could be classified as cruisers just like the Zumwalt. Ironically, the Tico class, only slightly heavier than the Burkes are cruisers Seems the line is blurred nowadays between cruisers, destroyers and frigates. The superiority of these ships is not proven until gunfights so the argument which one is the best is totally moot.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

Class isn't really determined by size alone but instead what their purpose is. Like, you can't exactly call a small landing craft (~250 tons) a coastal patrol boat just because of its size.

Very good program. It certainly seems that bigger ships in this group, have a much heaver armament and would be much more dangerous and have a much better survival rate. number one in the group, is in a different class, to number ten. I wonder if Russia has anything worth talking about.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

With regard to Russia, it's hard to justify putting their Udaloys and Sovremennys alongside other ships on the list. If this was a frigate ranking, it would look very different.

謝謝！

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Thanks friend!

If you're going to put the 12,000 ton Type 55 on the list, I don't see why the 9,500 ton Ticonderogas shouldn't also be considered. The type 55 maybe called a destroyer but by any measurement it is a guided missile cruiser.

@MrCastodian

Жыл бұрын

So Burk flight 2 and 3 3 is an cruiser? And Zumwalt, Sejong the grate? Atago, Maya, Kongo are cruisers? Even Kidd class. All cruisers according to your logic?

@zhe8586

Жыл бұрын

The Ticonderoga is old. The Burk Flight II and III are much more advanced. So even if you count Ticonderoga, despite its big, it won’t make it to the top 5.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

I am generally going by what the countries themselves class the ships. Unless if the ship obviously does not serve a destroyer function, like the helicopter destroyers of the JMSDF. As always with rankings, it's pretty subjective. If you make a video on your own ranking, I'm sure it will look different.

@Phantom-bh5ru

Жыл бұрын

@@EurasiaNaval exactly also america has the gal to call the type 55 a cruiser because its large (even though it performs the exact role of a destroyer and not even that much larger) and then call the Zumwalt a destroyer when its way larger than the type 55 AND was designed to perform a completely different role to any other destroyer. its the most brain dead shit i have ever seen and so many people just go along with it.

@junizhao

Жыл бұрын

The Ticonderogas are going out of service, so forget about them.

Deym i love your content bro! Keep it up! Im one of your biggest fan bro! ❤️🤘

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Thanks man!

I liked the way he discuss very deeply in all weapons i agree 👍 but i think so this list is not longer become acceptable because it's 2023 many other destroyers are there to come in list

the Ausatralian Hobart class was actually designed with the concept of being a better warship than the Arleigh Burkes of the USA IT IS NOT CONJECTURE either , as the brief was just that, It carries most of the same systems. The Chinese classes consideration is based on specs that are not really known, but you can't write them off, although I personally think the British ships seem to be the best but every last vessel listed here is basically a match for every other one,

This is no doubt the most accurate, unbiased ranking in all of the KZread videos.

想想北洋水师那些巨舰，还有俾斯麦舰大和舰谢菲尔德及最近的彼得大帝，战争从来都是科技和实力综合考量，武器只有用对了才有威力，不然投得越多输得越多。

Could you do a video about the building plan for 055? Like how many are they going to build in total

@JD-dm1uj

Жыл бұрын

At least 16, the next batch of eight will likely be the “B” variant, with potentially another eight, possibly “C” variant.

@georgewang9159

Жыл бұрын

@@JD-dm1uj excited to see that. Thanks mate

@junizhao

Жыл бұрын

@@JD-dm1uj I think the next batch is 055A, then 055B, then C. Most likely 32 ships, or even a D series.

@JD-dm1uj

Жыл бұрын

@@junizhao That would be an incredibly impressive feat, 32 055s would be an enormous capability!

@atlantis1988

Жыл бұрын

limt 29-32

Love from 🇮🇳

Hobart class confecion made in Spain ;)

I thought it would be another 055 is lousy copycat of Burke, turns out I'm wrong. It's good to see normal people on KZread, your channel restored a little bit of my faith in humanity.

055 is so amazing and so huge，very beautiful

The type 055 is beautiful!

@hoganhughes3265

Жыл бұрын

没想到台独也是中共同路人啊 世界真魔幻

Proud of India

Korea has just launched a new larger destroyer this year, which seems to be close to the Chinese Type 055.

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Is that the Batch II of the Sejong the Great? Interesting!

@biochemwang2421

Жыл бұрын

@@EurasiaNaval Yes, I believe it is KDX III Batch 2

@allenmoon545

Жыл бұрын

Japan will build a new 20000 tons destroyer too.

@user-wy5sn9xh9g

Жыл бұрын

我们中国的055不值一提，不用担心，你们的舰更厉害，特别是韩国和印度的军舰，都是征服宇宙级的👍

@yiju8314

Жыл бұрын

@@user-wy5sn9xh9g 加鸡腿，尤其是印度的驱逐舰，会潜水还会飞，还能冲向太空。

great video. can you please also make one for fighter jet for 2023?

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am a bit reluctant to do one on jets, because I know a lot less about them than ships, to be honest

Kalau saya menilai destroyer bobot penuh muatan - kosngnya, cms radar jangkauanya dan seatle juga vls yang di bawa, dan juga SAM nya,,, jelas arleigh usa adalah yang 1¹

RIP Zumwalt class

a question. where is the uss zumwalt?

@davidluo7127

Жыл бұрын

it is a big white elephant

Great video. YJ-21 are on 052D and 055.

👍👍👍

Subscribed from Pakistan

@EurasiaNaval

Жыл бұрын

Thanks friend!

@babarali7172

Жыл бұрын

Rafale and J10CP Comparison vedio make

In my opinion, the Zumwalt was the first, followed by the Type 055, then the Sejong, then the Atago, then the Arleigh Burke.

@ParaSF-im8kn

7 ай бұрын

lol

@user-gu8qi4me8x

4 ай бұрын

I actually genuinely agree with you ​@@ParaSF-im8kn

@ParaSF-im8kn

4 ай бұрын

@@user-gu8qi4me8x lol ur funny. its just that all these Chinese comments dont deserve a proper reply.

@user-gu8qi4me8x

4 ай бұрын

@@ParaSF-im8kn get a life for once you racist

@TaoHu-ri4mh

Ай бұрын

The Zumwalt is a pape tiger

If Zumwalt a cruiser or destroyer? If a destroyer than it’s #1.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

Can you tell me why? It has 36 less VLS cells than Arleigh Burke despite being much larger. Lacks a volume search radar, so it only has self-defense level AA systems. Has mediocre anti-ship capability if any.

Type 055 adalah cruiser yang menyamar menjadi destroyer .

16 Brahmos basically means engagements

indian destroyer uses the 90-100km variant of Barak 8 missile..not the 150km variant

@AdityaSingh-vi6me

Жыл бұрын

kolkata class use 100 km barak 8 but visakhapatnam use barak 8 er 150 km

@wallingnaga6563

Жыл бұрын

Barak-8ER (Extended range ) 150km range

Why would the type 055 be above in power to the alrieght burke flight 3

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

More VLS cells; stealthier; better anti-ship missiles; much higher level of redundancy; arguably better radar.

@user-xm6cb1gl7e

Жыл бұрын

It has hyper sonic Missile

HMS defender is the best for me😅😅

Personally I think modern Destroyers should be re designated as 2nd class Cruisers as well as frigates as Light or 3rd Class Cruisers.

@dabo5078

Жыл бұрын

Well that depends on their role. Does this particular modern destroyer operate on its own as a single ship task force. If so than it can be a cruiser

@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617

Жыл бұрын

@@dabo5078 Role yes, but size also. The escort role has always been done by cruiser, ships between 6-12 thousand tonnes. What defines them is their armament, role and size. 1st Class Cruisers (aka Heavy Cruisers) are designed to operate alone (ASUW and Land attack with its own AAW defence), to head a task force (escort/ protection from surface targets) and or protect or interdict trade (usually from ASUW and AAW but the 3rd class is a better ship for ASW). 2nd Class Cruisers generally are capable of taking on either the escort (AAW, ASUW ASW), trade protection and interdiction as well operate in Squadrons (ASUW and land attack) 3rd Class cruises (aka Light Cruisers) operate as escorts (AAW, ASW and a light ASUW capability), patrol and again able to operate in squadrons.

升级版055a排水量1.8万吨212导弹发射单元2024下水

@joey3291

7 ай бұрын

搞那么大干什么 还不如搞两条052d

i still have no idea that the type 055/future 055A has the most cheap and very ideal price for that kind of size, fire power and capability, making very easy to mass produce and low cost manufacturing and also catch up the quantity of western ship easily

@kapitankapital6580

Жыл бұрын

Honestly this is the scariest thing about Chinese ships, if the price is to be believed then they're just going to be able to outproduce the United States in a conflict scenario. It will be like the Pacific War but this time the US is Japan.

@eternalobi

Жыл бұрын

@@kapitankapital6580 The US has already pulled back to the 2nd island chain. I think the message is clear. a direct naval confrontation with China is not a viable strategy. but rather let Taiwan and Japan possibly South Korea counter China is more reasonable.

@kapitankapital6580

Жыл бұрын

@@eternalobi I don't think either the US or China, for all their furor, want a war. I suspect that we'll see China make a push with something like a naval blockade of Taiwan, and while the US will complain and maybe even try to send weapons, they won't risk sending their own ships into the area. I think ultimately this conflict will end with both sides sitting down and acknowledging Taiwan becoming part of China under One Country Two Systems. If the US is smart they'll negotiate this sooner rather than later to get compromises like China recognising Japanese sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands, which will help stabilise East Asia in the long run.

@junizhao

Жыл бұрын

@@eternalobi you forgot North Korea and Russia in this scenario.

@dylanpeace5877

Жыл бұрын

​@@eternalobi You are right😂

Why does the A Burke's have an exposed lattice mast?Makes it look like it's from the 60's.Ugly US is #2 and falling fast

What about Russian warship carrying NWH🤔

The Type 055 destroyer, in terms of missiles, radar, and warship electrical systems, is the most powerful and largest warship in the world today! Moreover, I would like to emphasize that it is also the most aesthetically pleasing warship. Truly, its appearance is exceptionally beautiful!

@dafleemd.hanapiah8756

Жыл бұрын

Ppp

@sandysimpson9615

Жыл бұрын

The Type 055 looks good will be brilliant at takeaway deliveries as China,s fleet is coastal and not a blue water fleet and the crew have very little warfare training so they are ver limited. It will look fantastic at the bottom of the pacific. Oh shit they don’t have that ability

@arthurananda3610

Жыл бұрын

@@sandysimpson9615 Hahahahaha, it's truly laughable to say that the Type 055 can't reach the Pacific! As early as 2021, a Chinese naval fleet entered the exclusive economic zone off Alaska, which included the Type 055 Destroyer 'Nanchang'. Your comment comes across as an impotent person accustomed to attacking others due to a sense of deep-seated inferiority. It's both pitiful and hilarious😄

@Spartan-jg4bf

Жыл бұрын

It's actually a crusier

@gsimon6407

Жыл бұрын

@@sandysimpson9615 lol, very sour of you😂

I don't see RF Project 2145 or swordship here.

China💪👍

@harpalsinhchampavat4269

Жыл бұрын

India

@wtfgenos4836

Жыл бұрын

India still has a long way to go

Chinese ship even in this list? are you joking on the Mars?

@atlantis1988

Жыл бұрын

china boat it's fish boat

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

What's wrong?

@joey3291

7 ай бұрын

As a chinese, I declare that all he said is lie! We only have fishing boats!!!