the canberra class is the same ship as the juan carlos 1 class, both are made by Navantia and are based on the same design

@valenrn8657

3 жыл бұрын

The Canberra class is slightly different from Juan Carlos 1 class due to the Canberra class's enforced Lloyd's Naval Rules.

@Muarijun

3 жыл бұрын

@@valenrn8657 Nonsense.

@valenrn8657

3 жыл бұрын

@@Muarijun en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra-class_landing_helicopter_dock _Unlike the Spanish vessel, the Australian ships are built to meet Lloyd's Naval Rules_ Try again

@valenrn8657

3 жыл бұрын

@@Muarijun navalinstitute.com.au/hmas-canberra-dwarfs-structures-on-suva-wharf/ _Canberra has the same physical dimensions as Juan Carlos I, but differs in the design of the island superstructure and the internal layout, in order to meet Australian conditions and requirements. Unlike the Spanish vessel, the Australian ships are built to meet Lloyd’s Naval Rules._

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

Are you people slow?

The australian Camberra class is made by Navantia, the same spanish company that made the Juan Carlos I

@georgepantazis141

3 жыл бұрын

From deck up and in side it's Australian made.

@brujulacapo

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah it's Spanish too

@mtrd9388

3 жыл бұрын

@@georgepantazis141 Yes, but of for yes is spanish, because it made the same company of spain, (Navantia) But Navantia opened the other company in Australy

@tuvisertuviser68

3 жыл бұрын

Si. Son buques de la clase Juan Carlos I. El casco fue construido en España y la superestructura en Australia por una union de empresas españolas y australianas para adaptarla a las necesidades concretas de Australia. Hay otro navio gemelo construido para Turquia.

@OscarMartinez-fn5pi

3 жыл бұрын

It is the same boat with different onboard systems adapted to the needs of the Australian Navy. In Spain we are delighted with the trust that the Australian Navy has placed in Navantia, and we hope that the collaboration with the Australian government and companies will last for many years.

The Juan Carlos I and the Canberra Class are the same ship make by the espanish Navantia.

@kcharles8857

3 жыл бұрын

Same hull. Island, weapons control systems etc etc are customized to ADF requirements and built by BAE Australia. So, different.

@Muarijun

3 жыл бұрын

@@kcharles8857 Details. They are the same basic ship

@valenrn8657

3 жыл бұрын

@@Muarijun navalinstitute.com.au/hmas-canberra-dwarfs-structures-on-suva-wharf/ Canberra has the same physical dimensions as Juan Carlos I, but differs in the design of the island superstructure and the internal layout, in order to meet Australian conditions and requirements. Unlike the Spanish vessel, the Australian ships are built to meet Lloyd’s Naval Rules.

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

Nope. Spanish ship is designed as a light aircraft carrier with docking capability. Australian ships are built to be dedicated amphibious assault ships. They might look the same from outside. But their internal layout and the way they operate are completely different.

U left out the Type 075 LHD of the PLAN which has a displacement of 41K T same as the wasp class.

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

There is not enough info on the Type 075 to rank it, As we know, China doesn't really give any specifics on what it can carry or what systems it has and what performance those systems have are all unknown Info, therefore it's much harder to rank the Type075

@tritium1998

3 жыл бұрын

This channel either ignores Chinese weapons completely, or it will rank them lower than some random country's old stuff anyway.

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

@@tritium1998 Again, there is not enough info to rank them accurately.

@tritium1998

3 жыл бұрын

@@Justineexy There actually is enough info to rank them comparatively, but like I said this channel and its fanbase will be dumb about it.

@kevinlaw6191

2 жыл бұрын

@@tritium1998 It is ok, otherwise, it will feed the China Threat crows

I watched a clip of the French Mistral class ship, and I was very impressed. It can operate a hospital along with everything else it does.

@مقارناتالجيوش

11 ай бұрын

egypt got 2 mistral class from france

@dbyers3897

3 ай бұрын

Most of these vessels include medical facilities.

@KevlarX2

3 ай бұрын

@@dbyers3897 Medical facilities is not exactly what I'm talking about. The French ship as I watched the video on it, has the potential to have a larger than usual medical facility, almost like a Hospital ship.

*Thanks for posting this video!!!*

Proud of our LHD Juan Carlos I. Regards from Spain ! Good video !

So, the Canberra class is the same ship as Juan Carlos 1 class (both built by the spanish company Navantia), so, why one ranked higher than another?

@bigmanluigi8110

3 жыл бұрын

It's probably down to better configuration done by BAE I assume

@georgepantazis141

3 жыл бұрын

The Canberra class is Australian made from deck up and inside.

@raulpalomino9472

3 жыл бұрын

Camberra class have some modifications, like some diferent weapons, and big changes in the superstructure

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

Because Canberra is a dedicated amphibious assault ship. Unlike Juan Carlos 1 which is built to be a light aircraft carrier with docking capability. Juan Carlos can't handle amphibious operations to the same level as Canberra.

@ranua9327

3 жыл бұрын

@@RR-us2kp Why do you say that JuanCarlosI can't handle amphibious operations?

Addicted to this Channel ❣️

@adityatripathi3861

3 жыл бұрын

Welcome to our world😁

Thanks Buzz

Camberra class its the same ship of Juan Carlos l

@williambroadstreet3353

3 жыл бұрын

yes and no. the Spanish has been modded for STOVL and ammunition storage, the Australian government refuses to provide the LHD any missile defence and also mod out for a very small cost [Aus $500 million] the changes the Spanish JC has made. Again pissing off China is the reason. Appeasement, PM Scott Morrison is a sop.

@charlesjeffery9644

2 жыл бұрын

@@williambroadstreet3353 Like you said, yes and no. Missiles are carried by the escorts, putting them on Canberras just adds more weight and cost. The Canberras are also not supposed to carry aircraft. They are amphibious ships. If we have them carry fixed-wing aircraft, then they can't carry as many vehicles.

el camberra y el juan carlos I, son lo mismo

Juan Carlo I = CANBERRA. Built in Spain.

@georgepantazis141

3 жыл бұрын

Haul only.

French Mistral class from what i read and watched (From US source) should be up there i think. France has one of the largest sea area to protect among all countries (Mediterranean, Atlantic, Pacific, Indian ocean to name the large oceans).

Los buques de Australia y España son el mismo modelo y fabricados en España por Navantia

@OscarMartinez-fn5pi

3 жыл бұрын

Enteros no, muchos sistemas no son de Navantia son diseño australiano, es el mismo buque pero con muchos sistemas a requerimiento de la armada australiana Basicamente son una version australiana del JC1º, aqui se fabrico el casco y buen parte del interior, pero la la superestructura y el resto de sistemas se montaron alli

@joselozano577

3 жыл бұрын

@@OscarMartinez-fn5pi estamos hablando del diseño del buque. Cada país monta sus sistemas de combate, pero el diseño es el mismo.

@bh8671

2 жыл бұрын

@@joselozano577 yeah you’re wrong. Oscar is correct. Nice try though.

@joshholde2961

2 жыл бұрын

si, es el mismo diseño... una plancha para planchar!!

@joselozano577

2 жыл бұрын

@@joshholde2961 una plancha capaz de operar hasta con 30 aparatos 😉

As former Gator Navy (LPD-8 and LPD-10), not only did my ships NEVER carry MBTs but no ship in my battle group carried MBTs. Having either LCUs or LCACs in the Well deck would mean almost no room for anything else and the LCAC can only carry one MBT at a time. LHAs can carry two LCACs but that only means that only two MBTs could be deployed and they would have to make a return trip to get anymore. MBTs were either flown in or carried by special carriers and offloaded pier side.

@dundonrl

Жыл бұрын

I remember seeing USMC M1 Abrams on-board the USS Essex LHD-2 being taken from and back to Camp Pendleton in the mid 90s.

@brandonlevy8680

Жыл бұрын

@@dundonrl Didn't say it wasn't possible. I was stating, from a tactile and logistical standpoint, you would need every, Amphib in the Navy to get barely two tank platoons to any particular location. Those same ships could offload scores of AAVs and LAVs with the same equipment giving the marines they are carrying mobility and semi protection.

@kenmazoch8499

Жыл бұрын

when i was in, every mau had a platoon of m60 mbt's and a platoon of lvt (aav) amtracs.

For DOKDO Class photo, the first photo is not DOKDO Class 6111, but it is the Japanese submarine hunter helicopter carrier "HYUGA" 1881!

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

To the western people, they're all the same. Japanese, Koreans etc. They're all Asian

This year, the Turkish TCG anatolian ship will enter the inventory.

Top 10 SLBM and ALBM video release

Never heard of the Trieste class?

@yee3953

3 жыл бұрын

Credo abbia fatto una lista di navi d'assalto anfibio in servizio

@fabioprofili1549

3 жыл бұрын

@@yee3953 esatto

@egyeneskifli7808

3 жыл бұрын

Well, that ship haven't commissioned yet. If you really want to bloat the list with out of service ships, then the 3rd place should go to the Tarawa-class. Last of the class decommissioned in 215, but two of the class is still in reserve. I have a hunch that those two ship could enter active service sooner then the Trieste (which is not a class at all, just a single ship). BTW, the converted Essex-es (Boxer-class) could be outrank every non-american ships in the list too. Even the much smaller (less then half displacement compared to the current american landing carriers) Iwo Jima-class were able to complement more marines then any non-american ship in the list (and the escort carrier conversion Thetis Bay had a marine complement of 1300, that is more then double of the Trieste's normal complement). So if you want the Trieste in the list, then the places 1-5 (or even to 6th) belongs to current and past american ships.

@pietrodicanio9404

3 жыл бұрын

@@egyeneskifli7808 but the American ships didn’t have F35 or merlin and Aw 126 on their decks

@egyeneskifli7808

3 жыл бұрын

@@pietrodicanio9404 Which american ships don't have them? All of the currently commissioned landing carriers have F-35Bs, and the two in reserve can handle them too. The Italians only got 2 so far, and those were never touched the surface of the Trieste. So the Trieste is the one which don't have them. Merlin? For what end the US Navy should use them. There is the SH/MH-60 family. What is the AW 126? Even AgustaWestland doesn't know about its existence. If you mean AW-129, then so what? USMC have the AH-1Z. And what about troop transport in the Trieste? Does she have CH-53 or MV-22? Trieste will be a good and capable ship. When she enters active service. For the time being she in not an operational ship, which means she has absolutely no real capabilities.

it miss Trieste an Cavour...

@serwolf2443

3 жыл бұрын

...It's normal...Why tell worldwide that there are ultimate italian engineered ships?Naaah better to hide everything, 'cause latinos cannot produce something competitive ...

@randomwalk5095

3 жыл бұрын

@@serwolf2443 Italians aren't proper Latinos... Latinos is proper definition fro Center and South America

@SeveralWeezelsInaTrenchcoat

3 жыл бұрын

Because Cavour is a carrier and Trieste is not yet in active service

I like this Amphibious

The San Antonio class is not really an "assault" ship. It's designed to provide long term support for the Marines.

@deveryhenderson8335

2 жыл бұрын

they're putting NSMs on it....

@enricomandragona163

2 жыл бұрын

Really!! Have you ever been aboard one!!??

@stevenbass732

2 жыл бұрын

@@enricomandragona163 Sure have. Built 6 of them and did sea trials.

@enricomandragona163

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah ok unsubstantiated!!

@neruil77

2 жыл бұрын

I'm glad they redesign the mass, hated that fiberglass mass.

Bro post a video on top 10 Minesweeper ship

Hello . Love from Bangladesh . 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩 . #Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

@amritanshuthakur2942

3 жыл бұрын

bhai tumhare yaha hamesha islamic katarpanthi hinduo ko kyu nishana banate hai aj ek temple tor diya aisa kyu hai tum bata sakte ho

No Trieste or type 75?

TCG Anadolu is turkish made amphibious assault ship 232 meter long carriying hospital helicopters vtol fighter jet and carries mbt up to 50 and with many armored vehicles and carries armored amphibious assault vehicle ZAHA only two countries have this tech turkey and usa and also carries many USV unmanned sea vehicles. TCG Anadolu with these specs deserves 3rd place on that list And it has got a ramp to be able to fly aircrafts

The San Antonio, Type 71 Yuzhao, and Albion is claasified as Amphibious transport Dock, not aas

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

There is no such thing as an AAS. It's called a LPD, LHD, LHA. ( Landing platform dock ) San Antonia, Type 071, Albion ( Landing Helicopter Dock ) Wasp, Trieste, Mistral, Type 075, Ex-Ocean ( Landing Helicopter Assault ) America

The Brazilian one is the old HMS Ocean

@joaoverso1367

2 жыл бұрын

yes

Update. Albion class now run with Phalanx fwd and aft

The Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier has amphibious capability as it Second role is amphibious if need

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

Even people in the royal navy say that's a terrible idea. Amphibious operations are done close to hostile shores. A carrier should never be in that place. It should be far out at sea.

Finally some helicopter carriers time to commit watch!! (Isnt HCV and Amphibious assault ship the same thing?????)

@kdrapertrucker

3 жыл бұрын

No, a helicopter carrier is a carrier that operates helicopters. Amphibious assault ships operate helicopters, but also have a well deck to launch amphibious assault boats and equipment. U.S.S. America is a helicopter carrier, but the rest of the America class will be Amphibious assault ships. America was designed without a well deck as an experiment to test the old Sea control ship concept that dated from the 1970s. It was done as with the F-35B, they finally had a supersonic V/Stol aircraft such a ship would require.

The American class has 2 models, the first made without well deck, one more will be made this way, the rest of this class will have well decks. The Navy/Marines want a small fast light carrier, with this more F35b can fly off with larger fuel more space for work crews. Pretty good idea.

Why didn't you include Japan's Izumo class or China's type 075 class 40000 tonnes LHD? These amphibious assault ship certainly deserve to be top 10

@bomomorses

2 жыл бұрын

The Izumo should be, but I don’t think the type 075 can compete with most or any of these in capability

@solomonokoli212

2 жыл бұрын

@@bomomorses I don't know much about the type 075 capability, but it weighs 40000 tonnes, literally the size of the French Charles de Gaulle nuclear aircraft carrier or India's Vikramaditya carrier. I feel that alone warrants a spot on the list

@bomomorses

2 жыл бұрын

@@solomonokoli212 Again I’m still leaning more towards what I said and you have a good point, although the Type 075 does weigh 40000 tons, it really is just a mirrored and less capable image of the Wasp. The size and most of its capabilities should earn it a spot on the list, you are right

@solomonokoli212

2 жыл бұрын

@@bomomorses Damn, now that you mentioned the Wasp, I actually see the resemblance, lol. Type 075 does look like a shiny imitation. Yeah, you're right, it's definitely not as good as the Wasp class.

@gravenguan

2 жыл бұрын

@@bomomorses Are you kidding me?!

Nooo i was late

At 2:08 , this is the japanese Helicoptercarrier "Hyūga", not a Dokdo class ship.

@Justineexy

3 жыл бұрын

They look the same, I wouldn't be surprised if the buzz got confused.

@dbyers3897

3 ай бұрын

@@Justineexy They don't look the same if you can read numbers. JS Hyūga is hull number 81 which is clearly visible here while ROKS Dokdo is hull number 6111 which can be seen on both sides of the superstructure. Also, Dokdo mounts a large air search radar between the two funnels which is absent on Hyūga.

Why are warships so entertaining ;-;

u forgot the Type 075 and 076. both btw are better then the america class

@kylexu227

2 жыл бұрын

@Austin Carr in what world?

the yuzhao class should be get replaced by the 075,Yuzhao is a different type of ship

Please top 10 MRAP vehicles

You make a video "minesweeper ship in the world".

Atlantico is a Ex-Royal Navy ship so how did it come up higher on the list than are current amphibious ship Except from it is basically a helicopter carrier

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

It's a KZread top 10 list man. Don't bother

But where is the Type 075 assault carrier :(

The wasp and america class are aircraft carriers in their own right

@ignacioburkhardt789

3 жыл бұрын

No

@stevenbass732

3 жыл бұрын

@@ignacioburkhardt789 Yes. They're classed as helicopter assault ships, but they also have the capability to carry and support fixed wing aircraft such as the Harrier and F35.

@brandonlevy8680

Жыл бұрын

Not even close. They can carry VSTOL aircraft, but they are nowhere close to aircraft carriers. Flight deck is too short, no catapult and do not have the elevators or the storage to do sustained combat operations if they were specially modified to carry ONLY VSTOL aircraft.

First viewer . Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

So... the Netherlands no longer exists? Rotterdam class and Karel Doorman class. The first one is a specific built LPD. It carries 130 crew and can carry up to 604 extra crew, like marines, airmen and other types of armed forces. It's 166 meters long and has a water displacement of 12,750 metric tons. It's top speed is 21 kts. It's armed with 10 M2HB .50 caliber machine guns and 2 Goalkeeper CIWS systems. It can carry up to 6 NH-90's, Chinooks or Cougars and has can carry up to 5 landing craft. It has a dock at the back which it can load troops and material through, it can even carry tanks and vehicles like that. The ship itself also has some stealth technologies. It furthermore also carries it's own command center, making it capable of leading missions on its own. Looking at all this, it outperforms most of the ships on the list.

@zhua2964

3 жыл бұрын

even 40000 tonnes huge Amphibious assault ships Chinese Type075 is also missed

@marchoderos1215

3 жыл бұрын

Strange that you mention HNLMS Rotterdam and not HNLMS Johan de Witt which is bigger and has a commandcenter.

@karlgreenkgv

5 ай бұрын

Well the two spanish LPD Galicia class ere even bigger and don't appear in this video

LHD TRIESTE 36.000 ton IT

I guess nations still expect to fight WW2 style Pacific theater amphibious assaults.

@olanrewajuihenacho178

2 жыл бұрын

Clearly not. These vessels are for strategic sealift not for suicidal huge scale opposed landings which have gone the way of massed airborne drops.

The Camberra Class and Juan Carlos Class are the same ship only different for these ships are the electronic systems build from Australian army and little different in the defense systems. The rest building are the same because in the Spanish navy proyecting buying in first time the F-35B from this ship. The reallity is the operated flying ground are Harrier 2 SeaHawks and Sea King from navy. From Spanish army Chinook, Nh90 and Tiger HAP.

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

They're not the same ship. One is a light aircraft carrier. Other is an amphibious assault ship. They work in completely different methods

@juaqui7565

2 жыл бұрын

@@RR-us2kp Pues el portahelicópteros sobra en este video, ya que es un top de Barcos de asalto anfibios 🤔😉👍

2:05 that is not the Dokdo class ship picture........

@Chickenworm9394

3 жыл бұрын

That sensor arrays indicate that it was an Japanese ship

Miss Kim q&a kab karogi? 🤔

America and Wasp class are externally the same dimensions. Also the Wasp class (and I'm sure the America class) is capable of almost 8 knots faster than what you're saying!

It seems China has 40k tons LHD - Type 075, not listed here.

French Mistral class N°7, you're joking...

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

It was a list made on displacement.

The America class is no way near the size of the Midway class even in its WW-2 straight deck configuration of 900' in length!! Which would of been a more useful length for the America class!!

Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction more videos.

Seems like everyone can wake up here and write down his personal top ten.... Than show to everyone on KZread..... Please continue with more sci fi.....

Saw my USS Essex (LHD2). Very first thing I noticed was the rust. All the other ships were fairly clean and my tub was like "Paint? nah it's just gonna rust again." I have some BM2 friends who would shit a brick if they saw that. In fact. Time to share this. LOL

@enricomandragona163

2 жыл бұрын

EPA laws don't allow painting of ships outside of the hull unless it's in drydock unfortunately

@ryanmartin4602

2 жыл бұрын

@@enricomandragona163 when did this happen? our crew painted the side every time we were in home port. there was even a floating barge with scaffolding just for it.

@enricomandragona163

2 жыл бұрын

@@ryanmartin4602 same here in Mayport FLA. I'm gonna guess about 15 yrs ago

The Cranberra and the Juan Carlos I look almost identical

@Floren_Andro

3 жыл бұрын

Both of them buit in Spain by Navantia.

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

Navantia design

What about TCG Anadolu?

@PortgasDAce-rt8yo

3 жыл бұрын

juan Carlos

@amenboughanmi5819

3 жыл бұрын

@@PortgasDAce-rt8yo but they mentioned the Australian one which is also Juan Carlos type

Ha ha here we go

And italian Trieste ??

Where is the izumo class and hyuga class?

Where is type 75 amphibious assault ship???

@f-35lightningii6

3 жыл бұрын

China Type 075 like copy of Australian Canberra class

@xinzhanhardware

2 жыл бұрын

@@f-35lightningii6 40000+tons, don't comparec the monster to your little boat

where is type 075?

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

On fire

Wow a good channel. Speak about the Mistral. This channel at the first picture: show the Tonnerre. Genius. What a good work. Please, make researchs before making those videos. I finish this video, please stop watch this channel. They speak about the Mistral but not about the Tonnerre when the Tonnerre is better than the Mistral. So they litterraly forgot one of the best amphibious boat in the world. Wow good. How many others did they forgot ? I'm curious.

Video needs an update soon.

España necesita potenciar su Armada, siempre la hemos tenido, con ella se construyó el Gran imperio que teníamos ,poco a poco la conseguiremos, España Loveeeeeee os esperamos a 😉todos 😉, España esta de vuelta, todos a las playas españolas

You missed 075 of PLAN…

Only French Mistral Class is real Amphibious Ship , all others are hybrid between aircraft carriers and Destroyers.

@juaqui7565

2 жыл бұрын

Ese es tan anfibio como el Canberra y el JCI

Atlantico was previously HMS Ocean 😂

Why no have 075?

What about the Tonnerre class?

@orxi2

3 жыл бұрын

The Tonnerre is a Mistral class

@provencau76

3 жыл бұрын

@@orxi2 fair point

WTF, the Australian ship is the ONLY ship without any meaningful air defence weapons. Well done ADF, you knuckle heads.

Where is the Trieste Class of Italian Navy is better than Juan Carlos Class

Votre reportage date peut être , on ne parle pas du Trieste italien !!

Number of ships built pls

You forgot to include in the list, the new amphibious ship of the Italian navy, which is called Trieste

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

Not in service yet

@double00shotgun

2 жыл бұрын

That's "sad"

@massimobernardo-

Жыл бұрын

@@RR-us2kp 4:13 Atlantico Brasilian ? Decomissionad 2018 .

075-40000

where is tcg anadolu lhd

indian amphibious assault ship 🙏🙏

IZUMO Class ？？

Type 075?

Where is China's 075 level?

Izumo?

The aussie ship is the same as the spanish ship, for us aussies its a waste of time. Its has no defence and is a slab sided target for anti ship missles.....when its not picking up refugees and dropping food and water to pacific islands

@RR-us2kp

3 жыл бұрын

You need to look up what amphibious assault is. If it was carrying fast jets, it won't be an amphibious assault ship. If it had more weapons, it would take more crew, more sensors, more power to operate those weapons. So they need bigger engines. So where is the amphibious element going to be?

After american ship have forget 2 important class, 2 giapanese and Italian Trieste Is + big of Francoise ship, dodko, spanish, Australian, english, Chinese, brazilian and sant Antonio class are much little. PS, giapanese and Italiani are F35 carriera.

Egypt have two Mistral class

@laurentboitouzet9793

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed, they where built for Russia before the sell being cancelled because of the annexation of Crimea.

@Kemetian401

3 жыл бұрын

@@laurentboitouzet9793 👍👍

Where is China Type 076.

@jespino2390

3 жыл бұрын

In garbage

No china type 075?

Une fois de plus, pour montrer la force et la primauté des USA, dans ce classement on mélange des choux et des carottes !

WHERE ARE TRIESTE AND CAVOUR...???????

Sorry but the Camberra class doenst's exist is the same Juan Carlos I, both of Navantia

Et le Mistral ?????

竹島級は海上オブジェですか？

America, Wasp and the old Tarawas: Better aircraft carriers than the Ark Royal, Incincible le and Illustrious.

@garwhittaker3743

2 жыл бұрын

I should hope so since they have been scraped.

Where are the Japanese in South Korean flat tops?

075 is out of top 10???

NAM Atlântico é do Brasil👍😃power🔰💪💀🔰

The US Ships waoooo champions