#2 and #3 both were built to replace the 1961 P-3 Orion. Both are substantially better performers than the #1 Orion. It is now used for firefighting.

@mofleh177

Жыл бұрын

They put her in number one as a deference due to her age and long service.

You forgot the french MPA Dassaut Atlantique 2. The new version has far more advanced electronics and deserves to be in the top 10.

I have had the chance to fly 3 of them as PIC. CN-35, C-295 and Boeing 737.

@gangstaparadise-qu3su

3 жыл бұрын

You are only the number who is very lucky to fly this tame great bird

@theodoreolson8529

3 жыл бұрын

Get a job with Southwest Airlines, that'll tick the 737 box.

@charpsteve36

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah A p-8 is quite different from a 737

P-1's radars are AESA radars similar to that fitted on Aegis destroyer and fighter aircraft. Paired with combination of air-air missile or air-ship missile, it has the potential to decimate any surface fleet and hostile aircraft beyond visual range. Not to be underestimated as mere a maritime patrol aircraft.

Как-всегда круто! Спасибо за видео! 👍 As always cool! Thank you for the video!

amazing video

I demand a video on top 10 AEWC aircraft, currently in service.Plz consider my request.

The order is challengeable but at least it gives a good picture of what is out there for the MPA mission. I think that CN-235 is behind C-295 MPA by far now. I worked on this program with EADS/CASA the OEM that is now focusing on the C-295 aircraft. One key question is that if you had to acquire MPA capacity which one will you buy?

Cool

Cn 235

Love your videos they’re always very informative and accurate thank you

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

Thankyou

wow amazing Jai HIND Jai Shri RAM

The P-3 is superior to all MPAs. Just because its old, doesn't mean that it is obsolete Good job The Buzz!

@doggovision5817

3 жыл бұрын

So is the p-8 Poseidon

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

@@doggovision5817 Nope, the P-8 is bad at maneuvering, target tracking, armament range, it has the acceleration of a 737, and most importantly, it has half the range of the P-3

@user-op7gx5zs1l

3 жыл бұрын

@@tack9571 If the P-3 is better than the P-8, the US military will not hire it.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-op7gx5zs1l Well, no. The Navy makes some mistakes, and this is one of them.

@user-op7gx5zs1l

3 жыл бұрын

mr Tack If my English is weird, please complain to Google. If the development of the drone goes wrong, or if it is delayed considerably, it may be a military mistake, but if it fits well, the P-8 is a different dimension of patrol control than the P-3. I think it will be an opportunity. If it's a P-3, I think the Kawasaki P-1 is a better aircraft.

Make a comparison on LCH light attack helicopter vs Chinese Z-10 helicopter plsss

Wah mantap..CN 235 masuk urutan ke 5.

@kimhanner5194

2 жыл бұрын

Kita patut berbangga bro...

@orgkampong

Жыл бұрын

Copy CASA

@fuadamsyari4493

Жыл бұрын

@@orgkampong emang tau apa malay🤭

And the french Atlantic 2 ??? Is it a toy ? It's one of the best !!!

@amngroup

2 жыл бұрын

BREGUET ATLANTIC you are right it is doing the work

@ludovicbon5903

2 жыл бұрын

Atlantique 2 . Atlantic was for the first version . The last two letters were for "International Cooperation".

Where is the French Breguet Atlantic 2 with 8,000 km range ?

@dakohli

3 жыл бұрын

I would consider the Atlantic 2 to be in the top 5

@jetaddicted

3 жыл бұрын

Donald Johnson: Tu-95? B-52?

Wait and watching

go top 10 aircraft garriers plaese💪

Indian Navy recently bought 12 P 8i Poseidon...

@phinexgamer-hg7kv

3 жыл бұрын

Well it's not p 8i Poseidon, it p 8i Neptune, it's a India specific and upgraded variant of f 8i Poseidon

@radityac.m.s6851

3 жыл бұрын

Downgrade

@phinexgamer-hg7kv

3 жыл бұрын

No it is a upgrade

@radityac.m.s6851

3 жыл бұрын

@@phinexgamer-hg7kv I know ..... it's just not as sophisticated as P8a Poseidon

비교하여 보여주는 고마운 채널입니다

I fall in love your voice.😍😍

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

Thankyou 😊

@mskhan3094

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebuzz4108 😂

@regregan5755

4 жыл бұрын

Haha seriously?

@zarifamsyar6274

4 жыл бұрын

Face reveal?

@dheerajmurthy393

4 жыл бұрын

Yea we want face reveal for 100k celebration!

Would an Osprey have any advantage as a search and rescue aircraft? It could get to a wreck faster than a helicopter, and then remain stationary as rescue divers worked to save a crew.

@SAMX4949

3 жыл бұрын

Down wash will be too strong

C295 philippine airforce have many of these all brand new

Countries like Pakistan,Bangladesh,Algeria,Australia,Sweden and Hellenic navy need's 15 Casa Cn-235 Mpa

P-3, though the workhorse of the USN, is ancient. Number 1? Mmmm.

The P3 Orion is nearly obsolete and being currently replaced by the P-8 Poseidon, which has the latest avionics and technology installed. The P-1 rivals nearly equal to the P-8, with different tactics designed in mind, which makes it hard to actually compare which is better or not. It uses 4 instead of two engines, which makes it safer to operate in the large bodies of sea without worries of needing to return to base if an engine is malfunctioning, unlike the P-8, which would need to due to the fact it only has two engines. Also, the P-8 is designed for high altitude and speed, while the P-1 is designed for both high and low altitude operations with slower stall speeds, but preferably slower speeds. The technology is also very different, making it harder to compare. One of the benefits of the P-8 is an abundance of spare parts if needed for repairs, due to being designed on a commercial airliner. The P-1 however is built specifically for military use, making spare parts harder to find for repairs.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

Obsolete? Are you serious? The P-3 is superior to the P-8 in what you actually need in an MPA

@amngroup

2 жыл бұрын

What is missing here is that some of the aircraft cited although very capable are being phased out and will no longer be procuded by their OEMs.

Was that the older ATR72 MPA and not the newer 600 model?

Kawasaki p1 👏👏👏

Since the P-8 replaces the P-3, how can you say the P-3 is better?? P-8 has sensors and attack abilities the P-3 can only dream about.

The P-3 is old and does not outrank the P-8

Argus # 1. 🇨🇦

Having 4 engines causing more disruption with sensors for detection from what UK trial found out thus UK went with more expensive P8. P1 also made an error with claim that S Korean destroyers used targeting radar on them when they were using detection radar to rescue N Korean fisherman.

Brazil have banderulha too🇧🇷

Olá sou brasileiro, e boa parte dos aviões militares fabricados aqui são da EMBRAER como este referido no vídeo e o A29 super tucano, boa tarde (Aqui no Brasil já é de tarde)

P-3 Orion 1st.?.crazy!!!

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

How is it crazy? The P-3 is by far the best ASW/MPA that was ever built.

😍

You see with the aircrafts and all the machines buzzing hums it's not so bad to know avg for a type stat operational flown or worked charts by hours daily or yearly. With the flying cylinders, sausages and or cigars as well as with all UFO and aircrafts those parametres depend crucially on the engines, fuel types, territories, environment, and the companies of men and women they are being operated in and by. What concerns com, fuel and currencies consumption characteristics you might have been supposedly fully updated on the matter already. Com as you may probably know is an army word for commerce in some english like speaking vocabularies.

Why there is no tu-142 or il-38?

Wished to see beriev albatross 😕

赤いラインが入ったP1は試作1号機？

Price would be nice.

SAAB Swordfish MPA 👍🏻

Why is the older, slower, less heavily armed P3 ranked higher than the P8. Maybe the MAD?

@mr.nobody---

2 жыл бұрын

Because of the things the others can't do.....like fly at 30 feet with saltwater splash hitting their intakes.... Amongst it's other strengths in comparison to the other platforms.

@rayjames6096

Жыл бұрын

Going slow is in the job description of a maritime patrol aircraft.

P3 Orion is told , the avionics of that aircraft is pretty old.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

Just because it's old doesn't mean that it's worse. It's easy to upgrade the avionics.

Wheres the CP 140 Aurora? This Canadian plane has a 9000 km range and is basically an Orion with the Vikings avionics. Canada has the longest coastline in the world and this plane has been our workhorse for decades.

@yegarff

2 жыл бұрын

She listed as #1 as the Orion.

@alpearson9158

2 жыл бұрын

most have no idea the Aurora is essentially a very different aircraft. Just leave them ignorant

Embraer 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

More Military videos on the Buzz : kzread.info/dash/bejne/e5x6p9Olj5jAXcY.html

Confunde el cometido de las aeronaves, no distingue: Patrullaje marítimo o/y lucha antisubmarina

Where is albatross

I was waiting for the Tu-95RT The AN-72 it's called Cheburashka by the Russians because their engines and air intake ducts are located near to the fuselage of the aircraft, looking similar to the animated teddy bear. I watched that as a kid :") Our face reveal is close 😉

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

Damn you’re right . Shouldn’t have said that . Lol

@randomdeadpool

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebuzz4108 By the way, good video!

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

Thankyou . And for the enlightenment too

@randomdeadpool

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebuzz4108 You´re welcome, and thanks for the reply. I´m always on your side

Is the OR rye un

Too much mixed measurement systems to portray same data set information, in particular power of engines.

CN 235

How is the p-3 orion better than the p-8?

@garwhittaker3743

3 жыл бұрын

It ain't.

P3 better than P8?

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it is

@anonymouswizard5535

3 жыл бұрын

No,p3 is getting replaced by p8

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

@@anonymouswizard5535 The P-3 is better at almost everything. The whole replacement thing is all about looks.

@anonymouswizard5535

3 жыл бұрын

@@tack9571 hmmmm no worry

@alpearson9158

2 жыл бұрын

@@anonymouswizard5535 replacement is a fact of age not quality of performance; if it were possible to have kept the old Canadian Argus flying then they would never have been replaced, just upgraded ;but airframes have limited time

What about S3 Viking?

@scottmccambley764

3 жыл бұрын

Or the Canadian Aurora MP-140am which was originally a combo of the best of the P3 Orion and S2 Viking

ATR is also french

@PhantomWork

3 жыл бұрын

no is italian/french joint venture

Wow your up at 1 am 😁

@prajithxxx

4 жыл бұрын

@the buzz I'm from Bangalore......I know that you are from shillong....anyways nice video......I was interested in your videos since you were showing defense videos......I myself have worked my fare share in aeronautical industry ........nice work keep it up

@prajithxxx

4 жыл бұрын

How can I contact you through mail or insta?other than youtube

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

You can email us . 😊 at 100 k we’ll be doing a face and ig reveal too .

@prajithxxx

4 жыл бұрын

I suggest you should have a insta as well.... it will be interesting ......

@prajithxxx

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebuzz4108 oh that's nice....anyways nice efforts of making these videos

I believe the RAF also have Poseidon P3

@regregan5755

4 жыл бұрын

P8..

Wow the japanese one was built by IHI jet engine, its local made in japan jet engine. I expect it built by GE or WP usa

¿Why N°10 is ranked so low when it actually has better platform paramaters than some above? 🧐👎🏼

BTW Orion = Oh-Rye-On not O-reee-on

@jetaddicted

3 жыл бұрын

Only for the English speakers, the rest of the world goes by oreon.

Are you sure P-3 Orion is number one?????

P1＞P >>p3

why p-8 poseidon is #2 this a latest model compare to p-3 orion

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

The P-3 is superior, that's why.

The ATR is French not Italian the hq is located in Toulouse

@mlehky

3 жыл бұрын

No exactly. The airframe is French, but in the case of the ATR72 MP, Leoanardo in Italy is the prime and ATR is simply a sub that provides airframes. The airframe is built in France but then converted to the MP configuration in Italy.

@jpmeunier5595

3 жыл бұрын

Well try to fly an airplane without a frame or wings lol. This is french

@fabiotra4891

3 жыл бұрын

yes but nope airframe is built in Italy and wings in France so is from both country btw this is a weapon system, so if the italian Leonardo bought the aircraft and mod it with eletronic system and weapon is an italian one, just like israel AEW&CS is the system applied on different type of airframe from different nations, so... stupid comment for stupid nation pride

@jpmeunier5595

3 жыл бұрын

fabio tra well you do not understand it is just to be fair for example the Rafale is French because totally made in France but the typhoon is not Italian because only a few parts are made in Italy. Another example a song doesn’t belong to the music writer only, it is the result of a team. So the ATR is the result of a team work

@jetaddicted

3 жыл бұрын

It is both French and Italian. Grow up, kids.

Why is P-8 (a more recent platform) rated lower than P-3?

@andrewtaylor940

4 жыл бұрын

Are the P-8's in service yet?

@sameerthakur720

4 жыл бұрын

@@andrewtaylor940 In India, they were inducted in the Navy in 2013 and even took part in the search for the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

Because the P-3 is better. Say what you want about its age, but it's way ahead of its time. On the other hand the P-8 is slow and it isn't as maneuverable as the P-3

@sameerthakur720

3 жыл бұрын

@@tack9571 For a submarine hunter, speed and agility are not as important as sensors.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

@@sameerthakur720 The P-3 is upgradable, to the point where it's better than the P-8

sunilmotwani krishna

បាញយូនប្រហើយ

Kawasaki P-1 is the best

順位　1～3には異論がある。旧機種の「p－３ｃ」が上位な訳がない。

Tu 142?

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

The Tu-142 sucks tho

Russia and China have no sea patrol airplanes?

Aji iman ratikoi je upload korila . USA t etia 3.56 pm moi jot thako.

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

Hahaha. Upai nai moi etia quarantine kori asu, travel korisilu he karne

@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebuzz4108 hope tumi vale asa. Eikedin gharat thaka bahirot furi nethakiba. Lockdown dibo buli huniso

@sagarborah5359

4 жыл бұрын

@@thebuzz4108 Are u an Assamese youtuber??? Tumi Axomiya niki

@thebuzz4108

4 жыл бұрын

No I’m not an assamese youtuber I’m from shillong Meghalaya your neighbor

@sagarborah5359

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the clarification. I have subscribed to your channel. I have one more doubt btw. Is the voice in your videos ur own @The Buzz

Pakistan detect many indian submarine with P-3C aircraft

Ил-38 N2 , Ту-142 N1

@AM-yt8wz

4 жыл бұрын

Андрей Остроушко мечтатель ты одноко 😂

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

No, P-3

None of the An aircraft (inc An74) are Ukrainian. They are soviet and were just assembled in Kharkov. Ukraine is not able to produce any air-craft as most parts are produced in Russia

@legend9805

2 жыл бұрын

Russia need to take antonov plant to russia because ukraine already a fail state

where is the TU-142M & IL-38N Russia ??

Indonesia...

@rubenbregisurbakti2265

3 жыл бұрын

Weh nongol lu vang

The winner is CN-235 INDONESIA cause Worth it to buy...

@amngroup

2 жыл бұрын

I visited BANDUNG in 1989, and have been the program director for the Avionics of the C-295/CN-235

ATR is French not Italian

@jetaddicted

3 жыл бұрын

It is a French Italian joint venture, 50/50.

@antibash691

3 жыл бұрын

@@jetaddicted I know. But it is based in France. It is a company incorporated under French law. So the nationality is French.

Ha... P-3 still #1. There will be no match to the mighty Orion!

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

Yep!

@pluto1165

3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha

There's no way the P-3 is better than the P-8 that's replacing it.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

the P-3 is better.

@pahtar7189

3 жыл бұрын

@@tack9571 In what way? The P-8 gets on station faster, has more time on station, is much more comfortable for the crew, has aerial refueling, has a much better radar, doesn't need as many crew, and is much more upgradable.

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

@@pahtar7189 The P-3 is a proven design, it can perform evasive maneuvers fast, some variants have aerial refueling, strong airframe, superior handling (it's easier to fly) more customizable, it can also be used as an air tanker, a land surveillance aircraft, AWACS aircraft and many more. It can also carry various different weapons like air to surface missiles, some have air to air missiles (idk why) and it can be fitted with modernized RADAR systems that are superior to the P-8, oh and it also has over twice the range (which is really important)

@charpsteve36

3 жыл бұрын

Lol the replies to this comment seem to be from individuals who have never flown in any of these aircraft yet are extremely convinced they are right. At least the American version of the p-8 blows the American version of the P-3 out of the water in nearly every way.

@charpsteve36

3 жыл бұрын

@@tack9571 Where you get the range number? Because the wiki, which draws from the official unclassified numbers shows the p-8 to have a slightly higher combat range.

BREGUET ATLANTIC???!!! It should rank at least number four: Combat proven and not only above the seas but in Afghanistan, Irak, Africa, as we speak there are Atlantics performing bombing missions using Paveway GBL all the while performing ELINT and command center. None of the aircraft you have mentionned do that.

Where is MH 370

Spain and indonesia CN 235 MPA

@azimmajid3906

Жыл бұрын

M

Kasih tau ngab kalo ada overproud

why Russia and china not on the list? they not interest?

Where is the ATL2 ?

@amngroup

2 жыл бұрын

BREGUET ATLANTIC 2

P-3 O RYE ON

P-8 kills P-3.

🇲🇨

*NO 1-10 ARE FROM 🇮🇩*

US replaced P3 with P8 and here its shown that P3 is better.... How??

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

because the P-3 is better

@rabbaniazzahra1784

3 жыл бұрын

indonesian CN 235 MPA is better because it can compete and its really cheap and doesnt need a lot of maintenance and even though CN 235 was bulid in the 1800 it still can compete with a little upgrade that dont costs that much plus now the countries who manufactured it is alot ,and its 100% created in indonesia and 50 50 for who made it

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

@@rabbaniazzahra1784 The CN 235 is very limited and can't carry out nearly as many tasks as the P-8A let alone the P-3B/C.

@wendelldig591

3 жыл бұрын

@@rabbaniazzahra1784 hahaha funny 😂 🖕 cn 235 is lost of load capacity and not a multirole maritime its from the sea compare to p-3 and p-8 from us its anti submarin and from land and aegis surface 😂🖕

So far, there is nothing similar to the CN235 GUNSHIP

The P8 poseidon is objectively NOT better than the P1, it's an inferior maritime patrol craft, simple.

The P1 was specially manufactured domestically for China, the aircraft was Kawasaki Heavy Industries, the engine was IHI, partner companies Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Fuji Heavy Industries, Japan Aircraft, etc.... The jet engine IHI developed in 1945, Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. , Is a combination of Fuji Heavy Industries (Zero Fight), this is invincible.

Indonesian CN 👍🏻🇮🇩

@felixmonagas3972

11 ай бұрын

?

WTF? No one Chinese or Russian Aircraft. Why?

@tack9571

3 жыл бұрын

Because all of those suck