Top 10 Aircraft Carriers in the World | 2022

Ғылым және технология

Aircraft Carriers are an important part of n avies. They have strategical importance for military operations conducted in seas. But what are the best aircraft carriers in the world? In today’s video, we listed the top 10 best aircraft carriers in the world.
&&&&&&&&
VSB Defense is the world's first KZread channel founded for the purpose of comparing military forces of different countries.
We review and rank the military forces (armies; land forces, air forces, navy forces, special forces and more) of more than 100 countries in the light of recent news.
In this channel we rank and review the best, most expensive, fastest, strongest military vehicles, weapons, equipments, aircrafts, helicopters, carriers, destroyers, tanks, rifles, submarines and more, in terms of technological advancement.
We keep an eye on recent military matters and make videos on recent news.
If you enjoy these kind of videos, do not forget to subscribe to VSB Defense!
------------------
|Sources|
www.globalfirepower.com : Reference detailing major and minor global military powers through accumulated statistics and rankings.
wikipedia: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
www.military-today.com : Military-Today.com is one of the most popular websites related to weapons and military equipment.
www.pexels.com: By providing free stock photos Pexels helps millions of creators all over the world to easily create beautiful products and designs.
www.pexels.com: Find high quality royalty free photos for your next project. ✓ Free for commercial use ✓ No attribution required ✓ Photos handpicked by staff.
Unsplash.com: Beautiful, free images and photos that you can download and use for any project. Better than any royalty free or stock photos.

Пікірлер: 263

  • @cherrymevavala5585
    @cherrymevavala55852 жыл бұрын

    GREAT VIDEO with best straight forward explainations 👌🏼

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota93972 жыл бұрын

    I like this video with this strong aircraft

  • @RobertJones-ux6nc
    @RobertJones-ux6nc2 жыл бұрын

    The US Navy has on hand some large Amphibious Ships that bigger than some ships on this list, may not carry as many aircraft but carries a lot of Marines on board and can land these troops in an Amphibious assault. One Class is as big as a WW2 Essex Class CArrier.

  • @PurpleObscuration

    @PurpleObscuration

    Жыл бұрын

    *HOORAH,* we enter through the sea and leave through the sea

  • @ahmedqama1110
    @ahmedqama11102 жыл бұрын

    Nice but we want top stronger nuclear rocket please

  • @williammorley2401
    @williammorley24012 жыл бұрын

    Kuznetsov is an old rust bucket and keeps breaking down but you put it ahead of the British carriers! 🤣🤣🤣.

  • @boom184

    @boom184

    2 жыл бұрын

    +++

  • @elijahespiritu7315

    @elijahespiritu7315

    2 жыл бұрын

    Maybe because it's made of out of tanks lolllll

  • @Javiercastillo-tw4ce

    @Javiercastillo-tw4ce

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exactly! Absurd!

  • @bwalyacharlesngowani15

    @bwalyacharlesngowani15

    2 жыл бұрын

    He must be a Russian sympathiser

  • @Grim_Reaper_from_Hell

    @Grim_Reaper_from_Hell

    Жыл бұрын

    But it provides perfect smoke cover for other ships.

  • @richardpeterka1645
    @richardpeterka16452 жыл бұрын

    Válečné filmy

  • @International_Zhengzhou
    @International_Zhengzhou Жыл бұрын

    Can you make some 4K computer desktop wallpapers about aircraft carriers and fighter jets? Thank you

  • @Eccoriens80
    @Eccoriens802 жыл бұрын

    French Charles de Gaulle : CVN CATOBAR (detail)

  • @alexbuffon1192
    @alexbuffon11922 жыл бұрын

    É UMA PENA QUE PORTA AVIÃO SÃO PAULO, NÃO OPERA MAIS NO BRASIL ! VIDEO LEGAL, PARABÉNS PELO VIDEO.

  • @onlyrick
    @onlyrick2 жыл бұрын

    It is said that when the Russian carrier Admiral Kuznetsov sets sail, the U.S. Navy is on high alert in case it sinks and rescue operations are needed!

  • @scaversaw1379
    @scaversaw13792 жыл бұрын

    USA👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🤙⚙️

  • @lucanoyz7876
    @lucanoyz7876 Жыл бұрын

    Italy have 3 aircraft carriers Cavour (with F35), Trieste (with F35), Garibaldi (with Harrier 2)

  • @norb0254
    @norb02542 жыл бұрын

    Can't really take this serious when a russian rusting hulk is 3rd on the list

  • @ladnerracing
    @ladnerracing10 ай бұрын

    Es mi primera vez usando un portabebe después de haber tenido ya 3 hijosEs lo más cómodo y Yam fácil de usar.No duele la espalda.

  • @katerinaslausen1678
    @katerinaslausen1678 Жыл бұрын

    What l love about aircraft carriers. They all look the same in periscope cross hairs, targets

  • @326147
    @326147 Жыл бұрын

    What's happened to the photo of the kuznetsov, where are it's tug boats and its smoke?

  • @andreamaio9519
    @andreamaio95192 жыл бұрын

    aircraft carrier San Paolo (which was the old French carrier CLEMANCEAU) is in decommissioning and sold as scrap, is about to be dismantled

  • @francissixtagisultura745
    @francissixtagisultura7452 жыл бұрын

    Next in armored vehicles countries in the world

  • @rayjames6096
    @rayjames60962 жыл бұрын

    7.57-USS Constellation...? It was decommissioned in 2003.

  • @STohme
    @STohme2 жыл бұрын

    Interesting video. As it is said in the video, there is a significant difference between the nuclear based aircraft carrier and classical one. Therefore, the first two in your list (Nimitz class and Ford Class) are much more advanced in comparison to all other models. Only the Charles De Gaulle with it nuclear based technology are a little bit closer to the US aircraft carrier models. However, given the size of the american models (100000 tons and more or less 13 Billion ISD)) with their very advanced embedded technology nobody can compete with the USA in this area.

  • @attilatoth8681

    @attilatoth8681

    Жыл бұрын

    You say nuclear powered CVs are more advanced, because they are nuclear powered? You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, pal. Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers have a larger operational area, and they can carry more aircraft, true. The reason? Because they fucking have to patrol half of the pacific and half the Atlantic. Also, America always had to be shown as the most powerful, because frankly, Russia AND China would take advantage otherwise. True, they are still the most advanced (probably), but I would bet that the JS Izumo and the Chinese Fujian would give them a run for their money. Fujian itself is believed to be between 85k and 100k tons, on par with the Gerald R. Ford. Just because someone, who almost always speaks in 3-5 word sentences says something is advanced, doesn't mean others are not... Izumo and Kaga, although much smaller, and can carry only 12 VTOL aircraft and a few helicopters, cost a fraction of the Ford, or Fujian (1B$ compared to the 17B$ of Ford; Fujian is not really known, but it was a converted destroyer, so it's probably quite big). One more thing. Ever wondered why the Royal Navy, known to be the biggest colonizing country in the world didn't build a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier? The reason's very simple. THEY DON'T HAVE TO. Their operational area is much smaller due to the fact the CV requires the fuel to be on-board (it's heavier than NP cells), and this is one of the reasons it can carry less aircraft (USS Ford's range is unlimited, but even the Queen Elizabeth can go 1.5 times around the world on a single fueling). However, the twin gas-turbine and quadruple diesel engines are much more economical than the enriched-uranium-requiring NP reactors on shorter missions. Just please don't speak without thinking again... it's embarrassing to read...

  • @ENGBriseB
    @ENGBriseB2 жыл бұрын

    Queen Elizabeth class can carry up to 72 Aircraft. She may not be as long but she's very wide. 3rd when fully loaded.

  • @jpc7118

    @jpc7118

    2 жыл бұрын

    The problem is that it is not CATOBAR model (only 2 countries do them, US and France) also, they are not nuclear powered, and it's a true problematic. Nuke engine brings true advantage. But I agree, I would put Kuznetsov behind both CDG and QE class.

  • @ENGBriseB

    @ENGBriseB

    Жыл бұрын

    Still she's a better carrier than the Chinese. They can build building's but the US and the UK have been building Aircraft carrier's for nearly 100 years. Now we are getting 74 F-35B Lighting Aircraft and then maybe more after that. 36 on each Aircraft carrier with Apache 64E attack helicopters. At least by 2025 they won't be light. Plus new drones. And with 4 acres of flightt deck and a large hager is good. Plus we have two of them. With maybe another on the way soon. The UK is building 24 Frigates and destroyers and submarines by 2030. And 150 new Warships and Submarines in the next 30 year's. It's looking good for the Royal Navy and its about time we are an Island nation.

  • @niweshlekhak9646

    @niweshlekhak9646

    Жыл бұрын

    @@jpc7118UK can build nuclear powered Queen Elizabeth carriers only reason it is diesel powered because its construction started after end of the Cold War after which UK only needed to patrol regional water. In the Cold War it’s carriers will need to chase off Soviet jets and ships.

  • @antoniomirandamiranda9978
    @antoniomirandamiranda99782 жыл бұрын

    Legal

  • @bernardcaliste9581
    @bernardcaliste95812 жыл бұрын

    Le PA présente comme étant le standing n'est pas le standing mais le liaoning (16), le standing (17).

  • @bernardcaliste9581

    @bernardcaliste9581

    2 жыл бұрын

    Shandong pas standing

  • @OrtaSaha2024
    @OrtaSaha20242 жыл бұрын

    Nice voice🤤

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @robertbishop5357
    @robertbishop5357 Жыл бұрын

    The US has the most aircraft carriers that easily outclass the first 8 on his ist.

  • @muthukrisnan5076
    @muthukrisnan50762 жыл бұрын

    I love India

  • @met7197
    @met71972 жыл бұрын

    San paolo brazil decomissioned the 5years

  • @richessery8475
    @richessery84752 жыл бұрын

    The Russian carrier is currently half sunk in a leaking dry dock. It has the distinction of being the world's most unreliable navel vessel. It travels with numerous support and maintenance ships such is it's unreliability. Other countries navel personnel take bets on where it will break down.

  • @Difcar

    @Difcar

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah it's actually funny to see that clown ship show up on this list in spot 3, it is a colossal waste of money and probably a net negative to have in your armed forces. Most nations would immediatly scrap the old Admiral if they had it in their inventory.

  • @35geordielad
    @35geordielad2 жыл бұрын

    Interesting you have both the Russian ship sitting rusting and the Chinese ship ahead of the UK Queen Elizabeth class modern ships 🤔

  • @Then.72

    @Then.72

    2 жыл бұрын

    Very strange

  • @user-vy4rx7bl8b

    @user-vy4rx7bl8b

    2 жыл бұрын

    China bought a junk from you and copied an aircraft carrier.But we don't look at this junk. We're going to have an electromagnetic catapult aircraft carrier.Of course, we are very happy to return the Soviet aircraft carrier to her successor in the future. Yes, his name is Russia😹

  • @dnedlew
    @dnedlew2 жыл бұрын

    Of the 10 ships on this list, 3-10 are mere targets of opportunity for the first two. The Kuznetsov shouldn't even be on this list since it can't find its way out of a floating dry dock. I'll give the Brits the benefit of the doubt since they have a rich tradition of knowing how to fight a carrier. ( but they're still a target). As for the Chinese ship, it looks pretty but again, zero combat experience. A target!

  • @aryaputram
    @aryaputram2 жыл бұрын

    Vikrant 🔥 Vikramaditya tho two tigers of India 😍🇮🇳🔥

  • @kensommers7449
    @kensommers74492 жыл бұрын

    Interesting that you have the Queen Elizabeth class behind the Chinese Shandong (China has zero carrier experience) and the Russian Kuznetsov, especially since the Kuznetsov has sat rusting in Port for like a decade and suffered numerous fires.

  • @mrkellogs5657

    @mrkellogs5657

    2 жыл бұрын

    i thought the same thing. queen elizabeth behind none experienced ship and a rusty skip. we'll see if china has air craft carriers left if they try invading taiwan

  • @user-nj2sg7jp6p

    @user-nj2sg7jp6p

    2 жыл бұрын

    你是说英国航母有经常抛锚的经验吗?😂

  • @user-ij2ur8ef7e

    @user-ij2ur8ef7e

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@mrkellogs5657 你是说那艘想来中国南海炫耀,却连舰载机都凑不够,还要美国舰载机凑数的英国航母吗!😂😂😂

  • @christianlegoff1434

    @christianlegoff1434

    2 жыл бұрын

    should be behind charles de gaulle too

  • @stevedunn5546

    @stevedunn5546

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@christianlegoff1434 Charles de Gaul deserted France and was given bed and breakfast by Great Britain. Maybe the aircraft carrier should have been called the Marshall Petain?

  • @archarajrajendran4222
    @archarajrajendran42222 жыл бұрын

    INS Vikramaditya have 283 metres length not 273

  • @khongpip253
    @khongpip2532 жыл бұрын

    Is there a Chakri Naruebet in this ranking????????????

  • @blaizegottman4139
    @blaizegottman41392 жыл бұрын

    Wow I didn't know that Thailand had a aircraft carrier

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @neowargame575

    @neowargame575

    2 жыл бұрын

    To day she is Helicopter Carrier.

  • @jonathanrisher8541
    @jonathanrisher8541 Жыл бұрын

    Why is the Russian flagship (Kuznetsov) even on this list? Much less in the 3rd spot? You know that Russia rarely used this this anyway. It spends most it's time in port getting repairs on a daily basis. There are literally other countries that can surpass this by default.

  • @ahmad-bi4ee
    @ahmad-bi4ee2 жыл бұрын

    USA🇺🇸💪😍

  • @Marbor1974
    @Marbor19742 жыл бұрын

    Kuzniecow 😂😂😂😂😂,okręt,który ciągną na sznurku bo nie jest w stanie sam się przemieszczać

  • @jacksonteller1337
    @jacksonteller13372 жыл бұрын

    The Thai carrier isn't in use it only sometimes sails with a handful of helicopters. And the Sao Paulo are out of service and about to be scrapped. Kuznetsov is scrap metal it is unsalvageable. The CDG is more capable than the QE class and type 002 carrier the difference between the launch systems. The US America and Wasp classes have more combat capabilities than the Russian or Chinese carriers just like the Spanish, Australian and Japanese helicopter carriers.

  • @brianwilliams1639
    @brianwilliams1639 Жыл бұрын

    Two problems! One, Thailand's carrier is just parked up in port and is no longer in active duty! Two, Brazil's carrier is somewhere off the Brazilian coast at the bottom of the south Atlantic Ocean. It's filled with toxic asbestos waste and now sea water aswell. Cheers😊

  • @markthompson5105
    @markthompson51052 жыл бұрын

    the russian carrier is rotting hulk

  • @pietrovavalle9427
    @pietrovavalle94272 жыл бұрын

    Italy 💪❤

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @svickysun
    @svickysun Жыл бұрын

    shandong is No.17

  • @srxanmansuroglu5440
    @srxanmansuroglu5440 Жыл бұрын

    Gerald ford

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota93972 жыл бұрын

    I like this strong aircraft

  • @natureofbeauty2416
    @natureofbeauty24162 жыл бұрын

    Next video India vs China

  • @user-vy4rx7bl8b

    @user-vy4rx7bl8b

    2 жыл бұрын

    哦,1962😓

  • @andymacinnes3215
    @andymacinnes3215 Жыл бұрын

    This video shows how much you know...Which isn't much.

  • @prasobhpottayath
    @prasobhpottayath Жыл бұрын

    I think it's time to update your content...latest #INSVIKRANTH India...!!!

  • @dylanentwistle3020
    @dylanentwistle30202 жыл бұрын

    Why put British carrier 5th place

  • @andresjuan5173
    @andresjuan5173 Жыл бұрын

    Beautiful video but America has an aircraft carrier for everyone besides there allies so we still have like a lease easily three or four without using the Ford and the Russian aircraft carrier you can see some video it was puff and smoke

  • @eralpalemdar
    @eralpalemdar2 жыл бұрын

    where is TCG anadolu ?

  • @sezerdemir763

    @sezerdemir763

    2 жыл бұрын

    TCG Anadolu Uçak Gemisi değil LHD ek olarak videodaki gemiler aktif hizmette olan gemiler (Sao Paulo hariç o parçalandı) TCG Anadolu ise henüz tamamlanmadı.

  • @danilomarsenic5397
    @danilomarsenic5397 Жыл бұрын

    Jedan kinžal i Arividerći

  • @oyevt
    @oyevt Жыл бұрын

    Kuznetsov number three? This is funny! Ancient rusty trough.

  • @drumguy1960
    @drumguy19602 жыл бұрын

    Haven't even seen this video and if it's accurate it will just be a list of the 10 newest American carriers. Having now watched this video it is a HUGE joke. LOL

  • @azamatakromov5021
    @azamatakromov50212 жыл бұрын

    Uzbekistan army forse

  • @benitopandiaz6958
    @benitopandiaz6958 Жыл бұрын

    Portugal vai construir o mais grande do mundo.

  • @omer4354
    @omer43542 жыл бұрын

    Turkey 🇹🇷

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @capmultser
    @capmultser2 жыл бұрын

    Don't know where you get your facts from but you are way out with your list of what the QE class can carry.

  • @louvement4860
    @louvement48602 жыл бұрын

    The Charles de Gaulle is only in 6th place while it is one of the only nuclear aircraft carriers in the world with the Nimitz class and Gerald Ford.

  • @nathanflynn9276

    @nathanflynn9276

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's not that large though

  • @nathanflynn9276

    @nathanflynn9276

    2 жыл бұрын

    I would've put 1-gerald r ford 2-nimitz 3-QE class 4-De Gaulle 5-shangdon very close behind 3 and 4

  • @louvement4860

    @louvement4860

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@nathanflynn9276 QE class is disiel and and has no catapult so it's a big disadvantage, not only can he not go everywhere he wants but in addition he can carry months of armaments and the planes have a shorter autonomy.

  • @nathanflynn9276

    @nathanflynn9276

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@louvement4860 at the moment CATOBAR systems don't matter as the f-35 (which is superior to the Rafale at long ranges) doesn't need a catapult plus there is the possibility of a mid-life upgrade and the QEs are better automated requiring around 600 less ship crew then de gaulle

  • @christianlegoff1434

    @christianlegoff1434

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@nathanflynn9276 why do yoi claim that f35 is betrer than rafale? none proof. f35b is les powerfull, with less weapons, and shorter. and qe defense systems are very tiny ...cdg has got a complete upgrade last year...

  • @christianlegoff1434
    @christianlegoff14342 жыл бұрын

    brits aircraft carriers are not nuclear and not catobar. so behind vharles de gaule

  • @Jubellymmel
    @Jubellymmel2 жыл бұрын

    The ageing wreck of a "ship" Admiral Kutznetsov falling apart in spot number 3 on that list and its chinese knock-off copy in spot number 4? Both ahead of the Queen Elisabeth class carriers? Are you serious???????

  • @2sqnbandit379
    @2sqnbandit379 Жыл бұрын

    the Russian carrier at 3. Are you joking. Its propulsion system is from the 1950s. How is that ahead of the British and French carriers?

  • @janwartangke1091
    @janwartangke10912 жыл бұрын

    Ok

  • @halimtalafuka9946
    @halimtalafuka99462 жыл бұрын

    Halim Talafuka,Alhamdulillahirobbil Alamiin,Allahumma Amiin.@$#

  • @Lebn18
    @Lebn182 жыл бұрын

    How can Charles De Gaule can be 6th while it's nuclear powered... minimum top 5

  • @ziib9883

    @ziib9883

    2 жыл бұрын

    CdG is top 3 with his nuclear propulsion and catapult. Only US aircraft carrier are better

  • @rungroj6579
    @rungroj65792 жыл бұрын

    เพื่อความถูกต้อง.พวกไม่ทีความเป็นมนุษย์.เห็นแก่ตัว.เงินและผลประโยชย์.โดยไม่คิดเห็นคนที่ลำบากกว่า.

  • @lonestar4858
    @lonestar48582 жыл бұрын

    для чего кузнеца то внесли, еще лет 10 стоят будет пока бабки на ремонте пилят

  • @donaldclifford5763
    @donaldclifford57632 жыл бұрын

    Two, and almost three of these carriers are decommissioned. E.g., Thailand, Brazil, Russia.

  • @InoZone1392
    @InoZone13922 жыл бұрын

    My village length is 350m with 200 people. same as the Ford class carrier 😭

  • @israeldebarrosteixeiraoen5048
    @israeldebarrosteixeiraoen50482 жыл бұрын

    8 sao paulo nao esta em operaçao 😀👍

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @evandalomartinsjorge9253
    @evandalomartinsjorge92532 жыл бұрын

    NO MÍNIMO OS DEZ MELHORES PORTA AVIÕES SÃO OS DO TIO SAM.

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @iloveyou-95
    @iloveyou-95 Жыл бұрын

    and china fujian

  • @seungwooham3204
    @seungwooham32042 жыл бұрын

    China…?

  • @squirepraggerstope3591
    @squirepraggerstope35912 жыл бұрын

    Put simply, neither Shandong nor, especially, Russia's Kuznetsov, are anywhere near as capable as France's Charles de Gaulle or the UK's Queen Elizabeth class ships.

  • @josephjun4688
    @josephjun46882 жыл бұрын

    1、Ford class - usa 2、Nimitz class - usa 3、Type 003 class - China 4、queen Elizabeth class - uk 5、Type 002 shandong - China 6、Charles de gaulle - France 7、kuznetsov class - Russia / Type 001 - China 8、INS Vikrant - India 9、vikramaditya - India 10、Cavour - Italy

  • @harwichsaint117

    @harwichsaint117

    2 жыл бұрын

    This looks a far more accurate list to me Kusnetsov wouldn't make my top ten though as my uncle has a nice rowing boat which I think beats it 🙂

  • @rohitb5834

    @rohitb5834

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@harwichsaint117 hes a Chinese guy who put India's latest Vikrant so low..... So....

  • @josephjun4688

    @josephjun4688

    Жыл бұрын

    @@rohitb5834 INS Vikrant only has 45,000 tons

  • @rohitb5834

    @rohitb5834

    Жыл бұрын

    @@josephjun4688 tonnage is not th e only factor.

  • @simbasp3085

    @simbasp3085

    9 ай бұрын

    @@rohitb5834 India's NO1.

  • @HoanTran-zz9xm
    @HoanTran-zz9xm2 жыл бұрын

    Thái Lan mua tàu sân bay về là 1 sai lầm , tàu chỉ để ngắm và chi phí bảo trì cũng như duy trì quá lớn

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @jnkewa
    @jnkewa Жыл бұрын

    They are just trying to make this interesting. The US has 9 of the top 10 Aircraft carriers with The Queen Elizabeth in being the only foreign carrier in the top 10.

  • @bernardcaliste9581
    @bernardcaliste95812 жыл бұрын

    La photo de présentation est archi fausse. Cela n'existe pas. C'est mensongé.

  • @louvement4860

    @louvement4860

    2 жыл бұрын

    oui c'est vrai, c'est de la vidéo pour attirer le publique.

  • @poshemuuu
    @poshemuuu6 ай бұрын

    The Soviet Union is not existed for 30 years, but it represented by 2 ships!! The third one, wich is now belongs to Chaina haven't been meanchened.

  • @gotshot8355
    @gotshot8355 Жыл бұрын

    The first 8 is all usa!

  • @user-he9zt4hj9i
    @user-he9zt4hj9iАй бұрын

    Man this sucks India need to do more than this.

  • @jmvelezpr
    @jmvelezpr2 жыл бұрын

    US Navy has 11 carriers so the top 11 carriers in the world are all in the US Navy.

  • @rayjames6096

    @rayjames6096

    2 жыл бұрын

    Obviously they mean top 10 carrier class since the US is the only country that has more than one carrier in the same class.

  • @user-vy4rx7bl8b
    @user-vy4rx7bl8b2 жыл бұрын

    我最喜欢看印度网友评论,没错印度是世界上最大的发达国家,印度是亚洲军事实力第一的国家

  • @JuanGomez-wp8gm

    @JuanGomez-wp8gm

    Жыл бұрын

    India es un país en vías de desarrollo.

  • @user-mv3ed7yr5c
    @user-mv3ed7yr5c Жыл бұрын

    SHANDONG HAS SOVIET SHELL AND EVEN SO IT IS NOTHING COMPARED WITH FISHERMAN'S WOOD BOAT!!!!!!!!!!

  • @Itachi951000
    @Itachi951000 Жыл бұрын

    Since when is the Charles de Gaulle a Clemenceau-class aircraft carrier? It is a single ship: the Charles de Gaulle. That's about it. The ship replaced the 2 Clemenceau-class carriers (Clemenceau and Foch). I mean if you're going to make a video about a topic, make sure to properly learn about it first? This is just basic information.

  • @coffee_cook1050
    @coffee_cook10502 жыл бұрын

    산둥이 왜4위인지... 말도탈도많은항모인데

  • @user-vn3tl8bs5q

    @user-vn3tl8bs5q

    2 жыл бұрын

    Maradocrass is LPH.

  • @user-gu4kv7zl3o

    @user-gu4kv7zl3o

    2 жыл бұрын

    츅규 햐기에 죻으니꺄 뱌쥰 듯 햐네요. 근뎨 어졔 볘튜냠에계 졌여요. ㅋㅋㅋ

  • @vovavinni9656
    @vovavinni9656 Жыл бұрын

    🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍👍👍👌👌👌🙏🙏🙏✊✊✊❤️❤️❤️

  • @user-oc6vg1tg1l
    @user-oc6vg1tg1l2 жыл бұрын

    感觉排名不真实,中国航母战力肯定是不如英国的伊丽莎白号

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

  • @amemusicvideo4512

    @amemusicvideo4512

    2 жыл бұрын

    伊丽莎白战斗力很高吗?多动点脑子

  • @user-vn3tl8bs5q

    @user-vn3tl8bs5q

    2 жыл бұрын

    艦載機の質的にもクイーンエリザベスは非常に強力な空母だと思う。

  • @user-tb3xf7iy4m

    @user-tb3xf7iy4m

    2 жыл бұрын

    你快点闭嘴吧!删了留言吧!低调点吧!服了都

  • @nickelroof6727
    @nickelroof67272 жыл бұрын

    On what criteria are these carriers ranked? Is it tonnage? Amount of planes it carrys? Length? Weapons? Propulsion system? Or just what the video maker thinks he likes? It just seems a bit confused. There are some relatively new carriers that are bigger and more advanced than others, yet they're ranked below the old Russian rubbish. Does the author of this video sound like he's Russian.

  • @matthewajlee
    @matthewajlee Жыл бұрын

    AJ

  • @user-xb6zk1ov6y
    @user-xb6zk1ov6y2 жыл бұрын

    США🇺🇸💪🤟👍🤜🦅

  • @user-yn4jy6lf9j
    @user-yn4jy6lf9j11 ай бұрын

    Все 10 - из США. Или у кого то есть сомнения?

  • @ayhan823
    @ayhan8232 жыл бұрын

    Bizim turkey gemimizde geliyor gümbür gümbür az kaldı ve kuşkusuz sihalarin gücünü göreceksiniz eminimki en az 4 veya 3 sırada olucaz... sihalar artık savaş uçakların yerine geçti o yuzden yer yerinden oynuyacak 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷👌

  • @alessandrobussolari4823
    @alessandrobussolari4823 Жыл бұрын

    US NAVY 💪

  • @kennychu27
    @kennychu27 Жыл бұрын

    Top 10 Class , Not Top 10, Top 11 l be all USA Navy

  • @paksuparmo
    @paksuparmo Жыл бұрын

    Indonesia tidak memerlukan kapal induk karena punya 7000 pulau yg banak dianararanya bisa dijad ikan lapangan terbang militer atau sipil.Wal Suparmo

  • @morassijean-michel9530
    @morassijean-michel95302 жыл бұрын

    vous avez classe le nimitz alors qu'il est reforme depuis 2 ans dans le top il y a tous les us porte avions reegan bush etc...

  • @DancingLedge
    @DancingLedge Жыл бұрын

    This person’s opinion is very suspect if they put that junk kuznetsov at 3. That has been a terrible ship from day one. It’s barely been able to get out to sea more than 15days a year and needs a tug shadowing it. Let’s see if it is resurrected after that incident with the crane. The thing is a white elephant

  • @robertdecool8537
    @robertdecool85372 жыл бұрын

    Classer un vieux porte avion russe devant le Charles de Gaulle français.. Fallait oser !!!!

  • @louvement4860

    @louvement4860

    2 жыл бұрын

    tu m'étonnes, la honte, le Charles de gaulle fait partie des 2 classes de portes avions nucléaire.

  • @armyquite4348
    @armyquite43482 жыл бұрын

    Kalian mesti mengatakan bahawa kapal induk milik rusia lah Yang tercanggih Kan....

  • @najmalnjm7919

    @najmalnjm7919

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/p31p1dmqaKTIYJs.html

  • @muksindika8806

    @muksindika8806

    2 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/g5mCpJOdisTPmMY.html

Келесі