That Hanbal humble opinion got me... Dr. Qadhi is a treasure 🤣🤣 masyallah

May Allah reward you for touching upon this topic. This is something that most Muslims are unaware or doubtful of.

@fatimaachy5764

4 жыл бұрын

Aamir Khan There are more important things in the world like this nonsense

@likatoure6810

4 жыл бұрын

@@fatimaachy5764 nothing is nonsense when it comes to religion.

@fatimaachy5764

4 жыл бұрын

Lika Toure stories from the middle ages of people who lived then. nothing sacred about it. excessive worship of mohammed . a man who has done good things in mecca. but also had sex slaves. and that he is an example for humanity, I See it. differently.

@JamesBond-ns8di

4 жыл бұрын

@@fatimaachy5764 aaah i see, your a man of knowledge... Who are those sex slaves if i can ask??

@fatimaachy5764

4 жыл бұрын

James Bond read the quran good ..the greatest horrer book of all time

This series is such a blessing!

Islam is A Way of Life!, beauty of this Nobel religion, it makes things easy for its followers rather , other way around. Thank you Dr. YQ, for enlightening our knowledge. May Almighty Bless you!!!

Barakallah feek to our sheikh and the editors producing this content. Keep it up!!

Ma sha Allah. Very nicely explained. A year ago I had given similar opinion on wiping over the socks. Alhamdulillah today after listening to this lecture, my opinion got strengthened. May Allah protect and preserve Sheikh Dr. Yasir Qadhi.

I love Dr Yaser Qadi, so knowledgable and very very practical explanation, may Allah bless you sir.

Shukran for that exhaustive defense of wiping over the socks. I never knew the various views on this topic. My life is much easier now that I have a better understanding of this matter.

Allah O Akbar, 2 days ago we had this issue being discussed in our office meeting in Sydney. Alhamdulillah this video appeared in my timeline and now I had the authentic answer for that. Jazak Allah Khair Dr Yasir Qadhi for answering such essential questions.

Jazakum Allah khayran May Allah increase us all in knowledge and wisdom. You cleared up the issue for me Sheikh.

Allahu tshperblefte Shejh, na nderove !

Masha Allah very nice video. I was actually wondering as one of my friend mentioned this part of wiping over the sock but I was skeptical. Jazak Allah khair Shaikh, for clearing the doubt in such a referential and concise manner. May Allah swt reward you for your good Akhlaaq.

Jazakallahu Khairan 😊

Sheikh you explain us very well in wisdom mashallah Allah may increase your reward

JazakAllahu khayran "humble hambali" Shaykh 😊

I love you ustad Yasir qadhi. Bless you. I was doing something wrong and from now I will do it right. And "HE" is the best judge.

Mashallah, perfect explanation, thank you very much.

Crystal clear, mashaallah, May Allah bless you

May Allah bless Yasir Qadhi with a grand gift!

Thanks sheikh for clearing this up, leather sock and cloth sock can be wiped over when doing masah.

what a beautiful video. I saw this one after watching a hanafi mufti saying that you should not even pray behind a 'ahle hadith' because they could have done masa over socks. So much difficulty provided in this world by blind taqleed.

@abdulhaseeb6091

2 жыл бұрын

Imam Abu Hanafi later changed his opinion and followed the opinion of his students which allowed the wiping over thick socks, thick socks are socks which are considered non see through and cover the ankles. Abu Hanifa RAH Infact did this in later time of life. As long as the water does not seek through the initial wipe it is valid. It does not have to be leather

May ALLAH bless Yasir Qadhi. Ameen!

Beautiful, sensible response!

ما شاء الله جزاك الله خيرا

masaallah that's a good ans with all the analysis. may allah bless our beloved sheikh yasir qadhi

Thank you and for the one who recommended your video to me jazkom allah khayr i need this fatwa especially in this cold weather 🙏May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala make things easier for us and May He grant you good in this duniya and hereafter 🤲

Jazakallah I was about to ask this question.

My favourite scholar Dr Yasir QADHI ❤️❤️❤️❤️

This is one of the best video on this Topic and explained clearly opinions of different imams. I missed a lot of prayers as I wasnt aware that massah is allowed on socks.

Jazakallah mashallah

Thank you.

Brilliant scholarship

May Allah reward the sheik and everyone involved in the production of this video and all videos which help the ummah follow the path of the prophet (saw). Is the following scenario permissible? In the state of wudhu put on cotton socks and normal (below ankle) shoes in the morning. Then wipe over shoes when performing wudhu for dhuhr, then take off shoes (keeping socks on) to pray Dhuhr. Finally performing wudhu by wiping over socks to pray Asr.

Imam Abu Hanifah did it during his last day's.. Its in Tirmidhi

Great scholor

Jazakallah shaykh. May Allah swt reward you and your family. I am so glad I found this Hadith. It makes it so much easy for me to perform wodu at work. Alhamdulillah. However, I sometimes do wodu out side (at the parking lot) due to bathroom issues. I feel uncomfortable removed my hijab and unfolded sleeves. I was wondering if I can wipe over my hijab and my sleeves as well?

@WasifHasassin47Khan

4 ай бұрын

There is actually a story where the Prophet SAW wiped over his imamah

What reciter is that at the beginning reading surat al nahl?

الله أكبر جزاك الله خير

Also I think you meant 72 hours(equivalent time to 3 days) ,not 76hrs. Jazakallahukhairan!

7:29 regarding wiping over impermeable socks, must be thick and able to walk many kilometres in 9:31 modern scholars - fine to do masah over cotton socks. Evidence - hadith on doing masah upon jawrab 9:31 goal is to make ease. Defeats the purpose to add conditions that cause hardship. 9:31 YQ opinion - permissible to do masah on jawrab. Custom back then was to wear leather socks. Cloth socks were not. Prophet saws didn't add conditions himself.

Alot of people wear leather socks they actually sell them at islamic stores.

If you said we can wipe over cowboy boots, will the person be praying with the boots on? If so, how do you ensure your toes pointed to the kiblat when sujood? The cowboy boots are kind of hard to bend at the toes

ALHAMDULILLAH

Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuhu Alhamdulillah, we uploaded the whole series of Jami at Tirmidhi Book of virtues Of The Quran In English Chapter 1 to 25.InshaAllah very soon we are going to start our new series Alhamdulillah

@fatimaachy5764

4 жыл бұрын

Good Words There are more important things in the world like this nonsense

You should have qouted the Hadith of abu dawood as well which says Prophet saw allowed the suhabah which were on an Expediation that you can masah on tasakheen( anything that makes your feet cover and warm) the hadith is graded sahi by sheikh al albani❤️

@Andalusian_

2 жыл бұрын

Quote it with a citation, please

Im wearing leather socks jus coz its accepted n makes life easy especially at work

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

Other socks are also accepted as the Shaykh explained in the video.

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

Unnecessary conditions which has no basis making life hard for the people. "The Deen is ease." "Make things easy for the people, don't make it difficult for them....." (Bukhari) Even in the hanbali madhab the condition is that the cotton sock should not be see through, which most of the socks aren't, they aren't see through. May Allah grant us the tawfeeq to be a source of ease and comfort for others and not a source of difficulty and harshness which causes a burden/trouble for the people. P.S: Who is op, ie?

@furious7754

3 жыл бұрын

@@salmanmemon1000 Well those are new opinions and it's safe to go with the opinions that are from there from way before. Also, I'm not saying you are wrong

Alhamdulila

Brother i saw a you tube video where they discuss about the hadeeth in Tirmizi about gawrabain they say that some of the Great Muhaddeeth say that this hadeeth is not Hassan or sahih. and he mentioned great names that criticized it.

@Andalusian_

2 жыл бұрын

It’s not authentic. And many don’t use this to argue for wiping over socks.

As salam u alekum sheikh please disable the advertisement they play gambling ads on your videos. Jazakum Allahu khairan.

@theahmedfahad

4 жыл бұрын

Its according to your region add

My mom said thank you

If I'm understanding this right: You have to have had wudhu before putting socks on for you to be able to wipe your socks when taking wudhu after losing it. You can't wipe socks during wudhu if you didn't have wudhu before putting the socks on. Am I getting it right?

@hasansiddiqi91

4 жыл бұрын

Correct

@bilaal3488

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks guys!

@Bingbang.1

4 жыл бұрын

salam bros. what if i dont put the shoe on? if im just home with my socks on? can i then also wipe over the socks?

@mohamedalphajalloh8154

4 жыл бұрын

Yes sir

@sedickkariem305

4 жыл бұрын

The way I understand it you have to have wudu before putting on your socks.

How do I get in touch with him if I have a question?

Great explanation but do we spinkle water three times over the jawrob or once?

6:46 for the controversy

A.alaykum sheikh. What if I stepped on water or water poured on my sock can I still do the wipe over or I have to remove n take fresh udhu

Basically he's saying that one of the Imāms had common sense and the rest were just pulling stuff out of their pockets.

Can you please confirm the number and reference to this Sahih Hadith. JazzakAllah khair

So if I do Masah over the shoes, do I have to pray in them?

Can I take the shoes i did Masah with off while praying or do I have to wear them?

I am looking for Hambali mazhab proof on this issue

Please, no sound effects for the Qirat/recitation.

@furious7754

3 жыл бұрын

Jahil idiot almost all recitations have effects because the mic

Brother Yasir can u explainthe word " jawrab " because this word is not arabic it was adopted to arab language from old turkish and farsi languages meaning feet grave it was not cloth like u explain

Is there anyone curious about why many scholars trim theirs beard?

قال النووي في المجمو مسح علي جورب من المرجوح يفتي علي ذالك عند قواإد المذهب عند الشافعية

@faadilgamieldien9567

4 жыл бұрын

أنذر الفواإد مكية والمدنية لشرح كيف يفتي عند مذهب كما قلت عند شافعية هذاه راجح لا كن نعتمد علي مرجوح أيض ا

Im a bit confused does this mean u can do masaah over a shoe or a sock or either I usually do it over a sock but is it saying u can do it over a shoe/or boots for example??

@jeanbaptiste3470

4 жыл бұрын

I think this has to do with the traveller who will perform his/her salat wearing their shoes/boots. Just make sure your footwear is free from filth that would render ritual purity negatively at the time and place of prayer. For example, you stepped into something nasty; clean your shoes nicely and then perform masah.

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

Yea, according to the Shaykh you can do it over both. I also do it over the socks

I've seen many brothers wearing leather socks

I’m confused about something. When doing masah, do you still have to do all the other steps of wudhu (wash hands, rinse mouth, nose, face, etc….)

@redvelvetcreamcheese

Жыл бұрын

Yes, wudhu steps stay the same. Masah only applies to the feet section of the wudhu process

Plzz dont be biased.we all know ur hanbali like the saudis. But if the socks are permiable and water can get into the socks then why not wash the foot instead of mas h.

I thought the water was supposed to penetrate to the feet. Also, why does the khuf/sock/shoe have to be below the ankle?

@isalutefamille

4 жыл бұрын

Jonathan El-Amin if i hear it correctly he said socks should cover the ankle.

@saniyev6013

4 жыл бұрын

@@isalutefamille what is the reason behind having the sock above the ankle?

@isalutefamille

4 жыл бұрын

Saniev not sure. SYQ mentioned something about the socks should adequately cover your feet while walking it in a certain distance.

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

The shoe or the sock either one has to cover ankle

Salam, if i do masah over my shoes, should i pray with shoes on or can i pray with my shoes off (only socks on) or should i do masah over the socks instead if want to pray with socks (shoes off).

@abdullateefmir5274

4 жыл бұрын

If u have done masah on your shoes then you will have to pray with your shoes on. If you do masah on your shoes and then put them off at the time of your prayer, then your ablution will break.

The hadith from imam tirmizi of jowrabain is weak.

how many times on should wipe on the socks is it single time or 3 times

@fezisheikh3044

3 жыл бұрын

Masah is done by wiping once only

Asalam alaykum, I wiped over my socks then I put my boot on and break my wudu can I wipe over my boot? Please reply

11:05

Why do people even put their feet in the sink? Just hold you foot up and let the water splash down who cares? Just wipe the fooor after you’re done

Hello everyone quick question. If I understood this correctly: Whether you have wudhu or not you can put on socks and wipe over them? ...or...do you have to have wudhu then put on the sock?

@theahmedfahad

4 жыл бұрын

You have to first make full whudhu and next time you can just wipe over socks

@amateurplasticsurgeon5617

2 жыл бұрын

You have to have wudu when you put them on

BELIEVE IN TAWHEED OF ALLAH AND IF YOU ARE A HANAFI,BE A GOOD HANAFI IF YOU ARE A SHAFI,BE A GOOD SHAFI IF YOU ARE A MALIKI,BE A GOOD MALIKI IF YOU ARE A HANBALI,BE A GOOD HANBALI IF YOU ARE A DEOBANDI,BE A GOOD DEOBANDI IF YOU ARE A BARELVI,BE A GOOD BARELVI IF YOU ARE A SALAFI,BE A GOOD SALAFI THESE ARE ALL SCHOOLS OF *THOUGHTS* OF ISLAM

If I don’t have wudhu in the morning while I put my socks and shoes can I wipe over my socks?

@hikmaseffa731

3 жыл бұрын

Sheikh said you HAVE to have wudu while you put your socks in order to wipe later

What mercy is giving to the feet and not the sleeves? During winter do we wipe our *sleeves?

There are multiple opinions on the 24 hours. Example scenario: you took your wudhu at 6.00am, break your wudhu at 8.30am, retook your wudhu at 2pm Opinion 1) The 24 hours start from 6.00am from the time of "proper wudhu" Opinion 2) The 24 hours start from 8.30am upon breaking the wudhu and entering minor impuritiy Opinion 3) The 24 hours start from 2pm upon renewing the wudhu with the first instance of socks wiping. Maybe Shiek YQ can elaborate on this as I heard this from Malaysian based scholars when discussing the same issue. If i recall correctly Opinion 3 was the strongest but maybe somebody more qualified can clarify. TYVM

What if I take the socks off, and then lose my wudu. Do I have to go through the whole process again?

@mrcounterpack

2 ай бұрын

My understanding is that once the socks are off and you don’t have wudu, you have to make wudu again. Wiping over them only applies when you already have wudu before you put them on. Allaualam, I’m not a scholar obviously.

I’m so confused. So can I do wuthu over my Nike socks?

@symbiotezilla12345

4 жыл бұрын

According to the hanbalis and ibn taymmiyah....yes. If you follow the other madhabs....no. Depends on which argument convinces you

@Lexcepcion

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

@sswmastering

4 жыл бұрын

Should cover your ankles & not the little below the ankle half socks

@danh4435

4 жыл бұрын

Just stick to majority ruling.

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, you can. Take the gift/rukhsa Allah SWT has given you through Rasool Allah (saw) who was sent as a mercy to the world

I THINK IF THEIR IS A CONTROVERSY *ITS* *BETTER* TO TAKE THE SOCKS *OFF*

Asalamualikum dearest sheikh.......u call yourself hanbali and not ahle hadith....do u do taqleed of imam Ahmad... rahmatullah

Sheikh Yasser, you can't say that the haddeth mentioning prophet SAWS wiped over jawrab is authentic. Only Al thirmidhi, ibn hibban, Ahmad Shaker, and Al Albani said it's authentic. Abu Dawood remained silent and all other giant people of hadeeth, Abdul rahman bin Mahdi, Ali ibn Almadeeni, Yahya ibn maaen, Bukhari, Muslim, ibn khozaymah , these are bigger in knowledge than the the 4 that Said uts authentic, they said it's a weak hadeeth, so that haddeth is not a proof. However, the strong proof is the doing of sahaba, more than 10 are reported to have wiped over non-leather socks. Also, thick socks (non transparent, and that stay in the feet and can walk with) is correct. Thank you

The narration by Mughira about wiping over the socks is not authentic, and it might be a shadhdh version of the authentic khuff hadith. That doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to wipe over your socks. I just wanted to point this out. Here is a discussion on that: kzread.info/dash/bejne/Y6ic3K6td8etj9Y.html (I don’t agree with his view on no limit for wiping, and I highly highly doubt his view on not need to evolution before putting in the heat, but it’s a good discussion on the narration)

Also please read this for more details www.askimam.org/public/question_detail/35826

If u do masah over the shoe will taking it off break wudu

humble, humbali opinion 😂

Legend yasir that was masterpiece Islamic lacture on important topic in 21 st century even donkeys don't wear leather socks everybody wear cotton socks so massa on socks allowed hanfis r wrong and giving wrong guidance to their followers ur opinion is correct

Why does the sock have to be above the ankle? Is there a hadith forbidding wiping over socks that are below the ankle? Or is this an extra condition made up by the ulama?

@MuhammadIsmailAPX

4 жыл бұрын

I think it has to do with the fact that the Quranic verse regarding the acts of wudu explicitly mention 'And wash your feet up to the ankles.' So the condition of the sock covering the ankles is directly derived from this. This is my personal observation.

@dabbetul

4 жыл бұрын

@@MuhammadIsmailAPX Subhanallah, that sounds logical! Jazakallah khayr...

@MuhammadIsmailAPX

4 жыл бұрын

@@dabbetul Barakallah feek

@theahmedfahad

4 жыл бұрын

@@dabbetul there is no logic in Islam just to let u know .

@dabbetul

4 жыл бұрын

@@theahmedfahad I know what you mean bro in general, but this was a very specific case with specific rulings, and it seemed to me like there was no basis in the Qur'an and the sunnah for putting this condition, but the brother clarified my misgivings:) So it was "logical" through the lens of Qur'an and sunnah:)

Nah Shaikh, the Salafi old heads still wear leather socks. As a matter of fact imma buy some when I get back ATL🤣

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

Lol the salafis are the first ones to permit masah over any sock

Dear Yasir bhai, u were a salafi and now you're a hambali... Can you pls clear that.

@romanrejapov8376

3 жыл бұрын

He was following ibin taymiya r.a as salaf

@shifeq9770

3 жыл бұрын

He is following ibn taymyaa, not modern days selfie salafis

Any genuine believer in the Quran would always accept the Quranic evidence as the only absolute uncorrupted truth. However, many Muslims sadly place the hadith above the Quran. This being the case, let us show here what their hadith says about the prophet forbidding the writing of his own hadith: "The prophet said: "Do not write down anything from me except the Quran. Whoever wrote other than that should delete it." [Sahih Muslim, Book 42, Number 7147, also Ahmed, Vol. 1, Page 171] Abu huraira said that the prophet said, "The 'Ummam' (nations/peoples) that preceded you have gone astray when they wrote books and upheld them besides God's Scripture" (Ahmed Ibn Hanbal). "Abu Huraira said: The messenger of God came to us while we were writing his sayings and said: "What is it you are writing?" we said "sayings (hadith) we hear from you messenger of God" he said, "A book other than God's book?" then Abu Huraira said, "so we gathered what we had written and burnt it all" (Taqyeed Al-Ilm, by Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdady) also (Oloom Al-Hadith, by Ibn Salah). The question that arises, after reading such words from the prophet, is whether the prophet regarded his personal words to be revelation, or in any way divinely inspired? The fact that the prophet forbade his followers from writing down his sayings and personal words, confirms that he did not regard these to be divinely inspired and that he regarded the Quran to be the only inspired revelation. To counter this strong argument, the hadith scholars explain that it is true that the prophet prohibited the writing of his own hadith, but they quickly add that this command only applied to the very early years of the revelation! They explain that the prophet gave such instructions because the Quran was in its early days of revelation and that the prophet was worried that his own sayings would be mixed with the Quran! The following points expose this claim: 1- When the revelation first started coming to the prophet he was in Mecca. This continued for thirteen years before the prophet immigrated to Medina to escape the persecution of the idolatrous Meccan leaders. During these 13 difficult years, documenting what the messenger said in conversation was not an issue of prime matter. The believers at the time, who were still a small persecuted minority, were more concerned with securing their personal safety and the safety of the prophet. According to historic records, the prohibition by the prophet to write his sayings took place in Medina around the seventh year A.H. which would be 21 years after the beginning of the revelation. It follows that the claim that the prohibition applied only to the early days of the Quranic revelation becomes invalid, simply because the prohibition by the prophet was not issued in the early days of the revelation, but after 21 years. 2- When we analyse the claim that the prohibition was meant only for the early days, so that it would not be mixed up with the Quran, we note another serious problem. In Sura 15, verse 9 we read that God gives a promise to preserve the Quran against all corruption. Sura 15 is a Meccan Sura, and thus it was revealed before the immigration to Medina and the subsequent prohibition of writing the hadith. The pressing question here is: Did prophet Muhammad not trust in God's promise, and indeed ability, to preserve the Quran? If Muhammad did believe God's promise, which is what we expect a prophet would do, would he still be worried that his own hadith would be mixed up or confused with God's revelation, which was preserved by God? 3- The claim that the prohibition by the prophet concerned only the early days of the Quranic revelation does not explain why all the four Khulafa Al-Rashedeen (Abu Bakr, Omar, Osman and Ali) all maintained the prohibition after the death of the prophet and allowed no one to write any hadith about the prophet. 1- Al-Sayedah Aisha (one of the wives of the prophet) said that her father (Abu Bakr) gathered 500 hadith from people and burnt them all. (Tazkerat Al-Hafez Al-Zahaby part 1, page 5). 2- Orwa Ibn Al-Zubair said that Omar prohibited the writing of any hadith from the prophet and declared "There shall be no book besides God's Book" (Ga' me Bayan Al-ilm, part 1, page 65). 3- Both Abu Bakr and Omar used to advise the people to avoid telling tales about the prophet. In one of his speeches, Abu Bakr addressed the people saying: "you tell stories about the prophet and you dispute among one another in the details. The people who will come after you will undoubtedly dispute even more, therefore do not tell any tales about the prophet. If you should be asked, say between us and you is God's Book, therefore make halal (lawful) what is halal in the Book and prohibit what is prohibited therein." (Tazkerat Al-Hafez Al-Zahaby). 4- When Osman became the ruler he maintained the prohibition. The same continued under the leadership of Ali. In one of his speeches Ali said: "I urge any of you who possesses any writings about the prophet to destroy it, verily, the people went astray before you when they upheld the teachings of their scholars and abandoned God's Book" (Sunann Al-Darami). 5- The prohibition of writing the hadith stood for a period of two centuries after Hijra. Among the six hadith collections we have today, labelled 'sahih' (authentic), is Bukhari's collection. Bukhari was first to be born out of the six collectors, born in the year 194 A.H. and his collection was the first to be documented of the six. Once again, this confirms that the prohibition to write hadith continued long after the prophet died.

If you believe that following madhab is obligatory and that their all 100% correct which ever one you follow , then there’s really no issue here !!! So don’t know why hanafi people lose their minds when they seeing a man wiping over his cottons , it’s in the Madhab of imam Ahmed so what’s their problem, sounds like ignorance and Fanaticism to me

After listening to this concept of encouraging Muslims to take it easy with the commands of deen, I feel it is very irresponsible and ignorant in interpreting the whole concept. I doubt this shaykh even Pray during his traveling by plane.

@Andalusian_

2 жыл бұрын

What a nonsensical and evil comment

@halalmeatshophk

2 жыл бұрын

@@Andalusian_ evil comment ?

IN ISLAM, AND GOD'S STATEMENT IN THE QURAN, THERE IS NO WASHING FEET! You....talk Arabic, nevertheless, comprehend it!

There are more important things in the world like this nonsense

@farhaanadam2609

4 жыл бұрын

I would politely have to disagree. Tahara is essiantial, majoroty of books of hadith start with taharat and ablution, even before ibadat i.e worship. If the masah is not done on socks that dont meet the criteria, then salaah will not count. If a peraon leads in this state all the muktadees salaah will not count. Durispidence is just as important as aqeedah etc. Period

@fatimaachy5764

4 жыл бұрын

Farhaan do hunger in the world or to radical Muslims or the over population This is important

@farhaanadam2609

4 жыл бұрын

@@fatimaachy5764 You are correct these are also important issues we are faced with, and need to tackle. Our religion is split in to 5 categories. 1, iman (creed) 2, ibadat (worship) 3, muamalat (dealing with business) 4, muasharat (how we live in soceity) 5, akhlaq (good conduct) First two are huqookullah (Allahs rights) and the reaminder are huqookull ibaad (mankinds rights). All these branches go hand in hand. To worship and not help mankind is not sufficient, similarly helping others and forgetting the creator and not worshipping him is futile. We muslims unfortunately fail to implement all fields mentioned above. The key point is all topics are important, depending on time, location etc one may be important than the other, and to say that the sheikh is talking about something that is not important, in my opinion is an incorrect statement. All issues need to be addresed, discussed and finally need to be implemented upon.

@fatimaachy5764

4 жыл бұрын

Farhaan Adam If I don't think something is important, I don't use it anymore I am not a robot eating with your right hand what kind of nonsense is that?

@farhaanadam2609

4 жыл бұрын

@@fatimaachy5764 I can't tell you how to practice islam, that is your choice and Allah will judge us all with his mercy. But we are to abide by the quraan and hadith, its as simple as that. We follow the reliable ulama on what they have said on all matters and act accordingly. If Allah and is beloved messenger have instructed us to do something we do it, if we have been told to abstain then we don't do it. Thats how i personally look at it. Each to their own, may allah guide us and grant us jannatul firdaws