Extraordinarily learned discussion on lowering the garment...may Allah bless Shaykh Yasir.

@watsoncorbin8060

2 жыл бұрын

I guess im asking the wrong place but does someone know of a trick to log back into an instagram account?? I was dumb forgot my login password. I love any tips you can offer me.

@milesjad8996

2 жыл бұрын

@Watson Corbin instablaster :)

@watsoncorbin8060

2 жыл бұрын

@Miles Jad Thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site on google and I'm trying it out now. Seems to take quite some time so I will reply here later when my account password hopefully is recovered.

@watsoncorbin8060

2 жыл бұрын

@Miles Jad It worked and I actually got access to my account again. Im so happy:D Thank you so much, you saved my ass :D

@milesjad8996

2 жыл бұрын

@Watson Corbin no problem xD

جزاك الله خير For a long time I did not understand this hadeeth at all. May Allah reward you for teaching us. الحمد لله

@believer0001

2 жыл бұрын

Dear this is kinda deviation. Our beloved prophet said not to wear below ankle. He is giving his own opinion not any of the great fuqaha,ulema So we won't wear it until the end of times period. It's applicable for all the times.

@Pain-jw3uu

2 жыл бұрын

@@believer0001 Bruh he just quoted the 4 madhabs and Ibn Taimiyyah, Imam an Nawawi etc. What else do you need?

@KnightofPower

2 жыл бұрын

@@believer0001 why are you going around and lying against Shaykh Yasir, without even having listened to this video? We who listened can tell that he quoted the opinions of the great scholars of the past.

@RIPer-rg2cz

2 жыл бұрын

@@Pain-jw3uu he's a salafi. If you didn't know, these people say they follow the salafs but in reality, they simply ignore everyone from the actual salafs to Ibn Abdul Wahab while trying to nitpick some knowledge from Ibn Taymiya. They only follow the salafs when something can named a bidah or the religion could be made difficult. They consider everything and everyone who isn't a salafi preacher to be truly deviated, innovative and inspired by kufr. They even ignore Ibn Taymiya when the religion could be made easier. They only think their preachers are correct and everyone else couldn't be further from the salafs. They think the same of the four great imams. It's best to leave these people be.

Assalamualaikum! Thank you SO much for clearing this up! Allah (SWT) knew I was worried about this. When I first heard of these Hadith I was SO paranoid that I was going to Jahannam because my pants drooped a bit below the ankle and I needed to go and trim the bottoms off of all my pants. Literally nothing I wear is out of pride - everything I wear is out of utility/usefulness as I live in a region that is frequently very cold and snowy so the idea of having your pants running high makes no practical sense. JazakAllah kayrun to you Sheik Yasir, your family, all of our prophets and their families, and all my brothers and sisters in faith, especially those involved in dawah!

ما شاء الله تبارك الله الله 😊 The specialty of YQ is that he explains in great detail without insulting others.

Suberb and easy to understand explanation by Dr Yasir, May Allah grant him long life & Peace of mind.

As-Salām ʿalaykum I was a Sālafi , I’m now just a Muslim who loves sahaba bārakallāhu feek Ustādh , this subject of isbal really gave me mental discord and wiswas every time when it went a inche beneath I would shake from fear of Allah ﷻ

@BK_Beloved

2 ай бұрын

Walaykumus Salam. You could get it hemmed in a clothing taylor shop if it concerned that much at that time. Did you look into that? May Allah bless you

@EuphoricPlaz

2 күн бұрын

I've been going to a salafi masjid, and they have been confused the hell out of me for a year. I pray there, but I don't listen to them anymore.

Alhamdullilah. Such a moderate, understandable position with a cogent argument. Allah bless Sheikh Yasir & his team.

Jazakum Llahu khaeran ya sheikh. Very explicit and eloquently presented.

Wow subhanAllah! I had the opportunity to meet this beautiful scholar today!

@believer0001

2 жыл бұрын

Dear this is kinda deviation. Our beloved prophet said not to wear below ankle. He is giving his own opinion not any of the great fuqaha,ulema So we won't wear it until the end of times period. It's applicable for all the times.

MashaAllah you really cleared the confusion of my mind , may Allah the almighty bless you a long live❤️

Subhanallah. Jazak Allah Khairan Katheeran Sheikh ❤️❤️❤️

Superb!! A great logical explanation that lies behind the whole perception -Jazakallah ul khair!!

Yasir Qadir always logical and intellectual

@rocketleague2136

4 жыл бұрын

you re not logical. dont show yourself sis

@leun6768

4 жыл бұрын

@@rocketleague2136 She can do whatever she want. Don't pretend to be Allah.

@sohail6759

4 жыл бұрын

Let's not scare ppl away from our beautiful religion

@abdulrahmanirl

4 жыл бұрын

@@rocketleague2136 you don't have the right to say anything what other Muslims should do. It's between them and their lord.

@johnlove2954

4 жыл бұрын

@@abdulrahmanirl cringe, dude

2 hrs of searching.but it's been clear now.jazakallah

Thanks for discussing the hot topic shaykh!

JazakAllah khair... For this great and insightful discussion. May Allah bless you shaykh

Thank for clarification... May Allah give you more knowledge. Jazakhalla khairan

JazakaAllahu kheyran sheikh. I am satisfied with your explanation.

MashaALLAH. Awesome and very clear cut explanation on this issue

MashaAllah brother. May Allah reward you best.

Alhamdulillah thanks for the explanation ustadz.. what a knowledge

Ya sheikh am grateful for the enlightenment

Jazakall Allahu khairan Sheikh Yasir Qadhi

After 2 years later it still beneficial jazakallah 😘😘

ZazakAllah khair!

MashaAllah! The best reply i could find about this issue. I was so confused about this issue and it had become hard for me to follow this ruling (to keep the garment above the ankles). JazakAllah khair. May Allah reward you without measure! Ameen!

@IslamicLecturesus

4 жыл бұрын

A better reply can be found here: islamicbooks.website/Books/al-Isbal%20(Dragging%20the%20Lower%20Garment)%20(2004)%20by%20Abu%20Khaliyl.pdf May Allah guide us al to the reality of the matter and keep us far away from pseudo-intellectuals and pseudo-scholars.

@wafeeqk9959

2 жыл бұрын

@@IslamicLecturesus that's a very poorly written 'book'' on the topic. can you imagine writing it but NOT MENTIONING even once Ibn Taymiyyah's or Abu Hanifa's opinion on the subject? It is Pseudo and immature (i hope not intentional) approach to writing a book on a subject when you skip mentioning major scholars in relation to it. May Allah swt save us from people writing books without doing research or intentionally trying to deceive Muslims and may Allah swt guide you brother to do some research and analyze before you just blindly follow and post here without full knowledge. Amin

@IslamicLecturesus

2 жыл бұрын

@@wafeeqk9959 So, it is a must to a quote a scholar's opinion in a book? Where is your daleel regarding that? In fact, a statement of a Companion is not a hujjah and you are asking the writer to bring a statement of someone a lot less than a Companion? Get out of your rock and open your eyes. The deen is, "Allaah said, His Messenger said" If you haven't understood such a basic principle then I don't know here you have learn your deen from? The author is providing evidence upon evidence from the second source of Islam and you are asking him to bring "opinions" of individuals upon whom no wahiy was revealed!!

Allah bless you sh yasir

ما شاء الله. أنار الله دربك ووفقك لما يحب ويرضى

Jazak Allahu khairan

JazakAllah Khair

Love this man forever

Nice submission!

JAZAKALLAH KHAIR

Perhaps the lesson of this hadith is that whatever is the sign of pride in your times, avoid that.

Great Answer..

Allah bless you sheikh

JaZak Allah khair sheikh i read a hadith today and it concerned me Alhumdulilah I got my confusion cleared because there is no such pride atleast for us in these times as you said in having cloth trousers in particular below the ankle . obviously it’s totally unacceptable when it touches the floor because no one would want any impurities on their trousers.beside in modern tailoring there is no break tampered trousers those are right above the ankle.

Alhamdu Lillah!

“You are not of those who do it out of pride” this only applied to Abu Bakr RA and nobody else.

Honestly i didn't expect this from u 😅 But yes it clarified this side of argument 👏👏

@talksense6648

3 жыл бұрын

He totally misrepresented the Hadith, Please do watch this what Dr Zakir Naik has to say kzread.info/dash/bejne/nmeJq8eCf6eoj8o.html

@faysalahmed9157

3 жыл бұрын

@@talksense6648 What Sh Yasir Qadhi said is in line with majority of the classical scholars. Wearing garments below ankles is NOT prohibited according to MAJORITY of scholars of the 4 madhabs: According to school of Imam Abu Haneefah: Imam Abu Haneefah (RA) wore an expansive rida’ (shawl) and let it drag on the ground. It was said to him: "Are we not forbidden to do this?: He said: "That is for those who show off and we are not among them" [Source: al-Fataawa al-Hindiyyah (5/333)]. According to school of Imam Shaafi (ra): Imam al-Shaafi (RA) said: It is not permissible to let the garment hang low when praying or otherwise in order to show off. As for letting the garment hang low for reasons other than showing off when praying, it is not as serious, because of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) when he told him that his izaar slipped down on one side: “You are not one of them (i.e., those who let the garment hang down out of pride).” [Source: Quoted by Imam al-Nawawi in al-Majmoo’ (3/177] According to school of Imam Malik (ra): In Shaykh Al-‘Adawi’s commentary on the Risala of Ibn Abi Zayd, he discusses the two opinions in the Maliki madhab one prohibiting the matter and the other considering it disliked. He says, “In conclusion, there are varying narrations about this matter if the garment is worn below the ankle without the intention of arrogance. According to the conclusion of Al-Hattab, there is no prohibition, rather it is disliked. According to the school of Imam Ahmed hanbal (ra): This is indeed the opinion of most scholars, as well as one of the two views on the topic expressed Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (RA) According to the Hanbalis, as is found in the books Al-Iqnaa’ and Al-Mughni, it is considered disliked but not forbidden. Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah (RA) is of the view that the general Ahadeeth that prohibit wearing clothes below the ankle are restricted by the Ahadeeth that prohibit doing so out of pride and arrogance. Therefore, if wearing clothes below the ankle is for the purpose of pride and showing off, then this is forbidden, and if it is not for this purpose, then it is not forbidden. For more benefit, you may refer to the book of Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah entitled Sharh Al-'Umdah.

@talksense6648

3 жыл бұрын

@@faysalahmed9157 brother, I have heard most of the scholars about this issue. And I agree with some of them and I don't agree with some of them. Now without arguing I am giving you a link of the video. Kindly go through the video and judge by your self. 👉 kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJOIvMitfJi7o84.html

@m.kthetiger2197

3 жыл бұрын

@@talksense6648 He has mentioned Imam Abu haneefa, Sheikhul Islma Ibn Tayymiyyah and Imam Shafi'i and Imam Hanbal and so on.. I love Sheikh Zakir Naik but I am sorry in this case I agree with the great imams opinion. If he believes otherwise its alright there are different opinions btw he is in the minority in this case!

@yooshatarique019

3 жыл бұрын

@@m.kthetiger2197 zakir naik talked about this topic again in his live q and a session. It is available on huda tv

Mashallah

White hat looks very good.

"Tajei" target loooool subtle but hilarious

Assalamualaikum shayk. With all due respect. I heard the reply of dr. Zakir naik on a similar question. In the answer one of his statement was that 'disobeying the prophet (s.a.w) itself is arrogance.' Irrespective of the society he lives in. So a person is disobeying the prophet (s.a.w) by doing so wouldn't the 'disobeying' come under arrogance that "no i won't do it". I want people to know that just because of one misjudged statement, you can't dismiss all that he says. I do love your lectures as you quote from quran and hadith I hope shayk reads this. Jazakallahu khairah.

@MrSaif03

4 жыл бұрын

well said my brother. exactly my point

@faysalahmed9157

3 жыл бұрын

What Sh Yasir Qadhi said is in line with majority of the classical scholars. Wearing garments below ankles is NOT prohibited according to MAJORITY of scholars of the 4 madhabs: According to school of Imam Abu Haneefah: Imam Abu Haneefah (RA) wore an expansive rida’ (shawl) and let it drag on the ground. It was said to him: "Are we not forbidden to do this?: He said: "That is for those who show off and we are not among them" [Source: al-Fataawa al-Hindiyyah (5/333)]. According to school of Imam Shaafi (ra): Imam al-Shaafi (RA) said: It is not permissible to let the garment hang low when praying or otherwise in order to show off. As for letting the garment hang low for reasons other than showing off when praying, it is not as serious, because of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) when he told him that his izaar slipped down on one side: “You are not one of them (i.e., those who let the garment hang down out of pride).” [Source: Quoted by Imam al-Nawawi in al-Majmoo’ (3/177] According to school of Imam Malik (ra): In Shaykh Al-‘Adawi’s commentary on the Risala of Ibn Abi Zayd, he discusses the two opinions in the Maliki madhab one prohibiting the matter and the other considering it disliked. He says, “In conclusion, there are varying narrations about this matter if the garment is worn below the ankle without the intention of arrogance. According to the conclusion of Al-Hattab, there is no prohibition, rather it is disliked. According to the school of Imam Ahmed hanbal (ra): This is indeed the opinion of most scholars, as well as one of the two views on the topic expressed Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (RA) According to the Hanbalis, as is found in the books Al-Iqnaa’ and Al-Mughni, it is considered disliked but not forbidden. Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah (RA) is of the view that the general Ahadeeth that prohibit wearing clothes below the ankle are restricted by the Ahadeeth that prohibit doing so out of pride and arrogance. Therefore, if wearing clothes below the ankle is for the purpose of pride and showing off, then this is forbidden, and if it is not for this purpose, then it is not forbidden. For more benefit, you may refer to the book of Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah entitled Sharh Al-'Umdah.

It makes more sense and logical, we cannot understand any hadith ignoring how classical scholars understood it.

Assalamwalikum, if Sheikh Yasir Qadhi can see and respond to this, that will be great inshALLAH. Sheikh has addressed a few issues which are against the 'status-quo' so to speak from indo-pak and al hijaz. Examples are this lowering the pants, birthdays, anniversaries etc. I had always believed them to be haram. I highly respect Sheikh Yasir Qadhi and love him. I find it easier to follow his opinions naturally. However, I would like to remind the Sheikh that it is the Sheikh's responsibility if ALLAH forbid, there is any mistake in his opinions. I will be following his opinions from now on considering that he is a great AALIM and ALLAH will ask him if there is any mistake. Jazakallahu Alf Khair. Barakallahufeek. Sheikh Yasir is a blessing for the ummah.

@salmanmemon1000

4 жыл бұрын

He will be given 1 reward if he is wrong

The hadith where it is mentioned that Abu Bakr(RA) was told by the Messenger SAW that he could wear his clothes beneath the ankle 'coz he was not proud is another confirmation that wearing beneath the ankle without pride is not a sin

@abdulazizbadi2782

2 жыл бұрын

Can you source this?

Subhanallah see how people are twisting hadith may Allah save us u people

@eysadiq9088

Ай бұрын

People who agree are following their desires.

A lot of people will come up with criticisms against Dr Yasir, to those people I have only one question, if the details that he had narrated in this video were baseless or false, a lot of scholars and other attention craving youtubers would have made 1000's of videos refuting it by now, Moreover Dr Qadhi is uploading these videos in youtube which is easily accessible to everyone even in the most remote locations of the world ! A man taking up such an initiative is saying the truth no matter whoever says otherwise

@watchmyplaylisttoopenyoureyes

10 ай бұрын

Can you give reference to the Abu Hanifa incident talked in this video

What indicates that isbaal is prohibited even if it is not done out of pride is the hadeeth of Abu Saeed al-Khudri, may Allaah be pleased with him, who said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: The lower garment of the Muslim should come down to mid-calf, but there is nothing wrong if it is between that point and the ankles. Whatever is lower than the ankles is in the Fire. Whoever trails his garment on the ground out of pride, Allaah will not look at him." (Reported by Abu Dawud, no. 4093, with a saheeh isnaad.)

@rustyray420

3 жыл бұрын

I live in a cold country. If i have my ankles exposed majority of the time, i can get frost bitten or other issues etc. It makes a lot more sense that it's a symbol of pride and arrogance than just a rule of how to dress. Will i go to hell for having my ankles covered?

@AbuAzZubayr

3 жыл бұрын

@@rustyray420 akhi, u can wear socks

Allahu Akbar

Thanks sheikh for describing it wonderfully. I was a bit confused regarding this topic. I always had a question why it's permissible to offer Salah wearing socks but prohibited having pants beneath ankles? Now I got the answer.

How can you give this a thumbs down

@WillScarlet1991

3 жыл бұрын

Islamophobes.

Shaikh what is the interpretation of the hadith that Umar Ibn Khattab(RA) said at the time of his death by seeing a young man lowered his garments below the ankle????!!!!

@ziyaaddhorat

3 жыл бұрын

?

Can somebody give me the reference of the Hadith where it says that Abdullah ibn mas'ud was asked that are not we prohibited to do that?

Could someone tell me who the qari reciting in the beginning is? Many thanks.

@younaskhan4183

4 жыл бұрын

Qari Hazza al baloshi

@7othman7

4 жыл бұрын

Salam. The link is found in the description.

Technically speaking... Nowadays.. Keeping the garment above ankles has become a status symbol (or pride) for trying to look more pious than others. Isn't it. . Wow.. That means keeping them up as pride would be Haram... It's really really amazing when u get to understand something.. Rather than just following mindlessly

@leun6768

4 жыл бұрын

Yes although being unique doesn't always implement pride so I don't believe that keeping it up is haram if the intention is right. However I see some people here that still utter their opinion without any respect. The salafi site "Islamqa" is very dangerous at some points. They even say that the Geogorian calendar is shirk or haram

@medskool6765

2 жыл бұрын

those that do keep it up... do it out of love of the sunnah ...and they face a lot of opposition because of it...so personally because of their intention I respect them.

JazakAllah khair for the explanation sheikh. Can someone please tell me the name of the surah and the name of the qari in the introduction? :)

In todays times, Hollywood actors lower long dresses on the red carpet due to being proud they are special and unique. In marriages they also have long dresses to flaunt the garment and richness. Such is the condition of modern times.

Follow the Qur'an and the sunnah👉The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: 'Whoever starts something good, and others follow his lead, will have a complete reward and a reward like that of those who followed him, without it detracting in the least from their reward. Whoever starts something bad, and others follow his lead, will bear a complete burden of sin, and a burden like that of those who followed him, without it detracting in the least from their burden. (Reported by Ibn Maaajah in al-Sunan, no. 204)

What is the ruling on keeping the trousers above the ankles during Salah? The imam of my masjid specifically insists this and says that Salah would me makrooh otherwise.

@alaoade

3 жыл бұрын

Your Imam is among those who hold on to one opinion only.

Shaykh can we have the reference of Imam Abu Hanifas statement regarding this ? JazakaAllahu Khayran

How are the questions asked to sheikh yasir ?

@hasinyanath8031

2 жыл бұрын

Askyq@epicmasjid.org

I agree with YQ on this issue but I personally like to fold my pants a little because it distinguishes us from non Muslims and it has become a Muslim look for some.

How do I send questions to Yasir Qadhi? Can someone help please?

@jiaulhuda1645

3 жыл бұрын

You'll find the email on his facebook page

Help ...! "all of mankind is dependent on abu Hanifa on fiqh" Where can i find this!? Help plz... Some in book reference

Where can I submit the questions?

which is the name of surah that is recited in the beginning...

@salimsuleman8323

4 жыл бұрын

Nahl (chapter 16) : verse 43

Assalaamu alaikum shaik Yasir, Please answer this isbaal related question: If I wear pants below ankle, I will have to roll them during prayer in office since as per another hadith, pants should not go below ankles during prayer. So, should I cut their length to always keep them above ankles or I'll be forgiven for rolling them up in the office during prayer.

@aayansaqib6444

2 жыл бұрын

Its necessary that the pants are above ankles. Folding them doesn’t invalidate salah.

I disagree respectfully. Let’s note few points: 1. One person who for sure has no pride is prophet Muhammad PBUH and he did not lower his lower garments below ankles. 2. He mentioned the Hadith of abu baker and took the part which fits his interpretation. Prophet Muhammad PBUH did not ask abu Baker not to lower his garment. All he said that you are not the one who has pride. Abu Baker (ra) still tried to keep his lower garments above his ankles. 3. Lowering pants below ankles means we have pride, if you don’t then what keeps you from not practicing what prophet Muhammad PBUH clearly told in his Hadith. 4. Sheikh gave example of Ibn Masood but also gave the reason why he has his lower garments below ankles. It was because he has deformed calf’s. 5. Sheikh gave example of Abu Baker but he did not mention that Abu Baker (ra) always tries to keep his garments above his ankles even when prophet told him that he is not the one who has arrogance. 6. Prophet Muhammad PBUH told Abu baker (ra) you are not among those who have pride and yet Abu Baker ( ra) followed the sunnah. Now ask yourself a question, how you know you don’t have pride? Abu Baker (ra) has prophet Muhammad PBUH as his witness and he yet he is following sunnah but we have no one to testify for us that we don’t have pride but yet we decide not to follow this sunnah, that itself shows we have pride. One way to get rid of this pride is to raise your pants above ankles, try it if you still don’t believe it. 7.Sheikh gave example of cloths 1400 years ago were used to show arrogance and compared that to cars in our time. Arabs have so many other ways to show arrogance such as more slaves, more off springs, more camels etc. comparing cloths 1400 years ago to cars in our time is not a good comparison. 8. Just few years after the death of prophet Muhammad PBUH, Muslims became rich during the time of Umer (ra). It was hard to even find people who can take zakat. Everyone could afford to buy and wear long dress but yet Umer (ra) made sure that people keep their garments above their ankles. He would stand outside the mosque and will order to cut the dress if anyone will have dress below their ankles. On his death bed, he say a young companion with his garment below ankles and he told him to raise his garment. Why, because he knew how important it was. 9. Prophet Muhammad PBUH told that Islam came as strange and it will become strange near end times. And we see that practicing Muslims are stranger even among Muslims. 10. Ans (ra) said to his students who were tabieen “ you perform acts that are smaller in your eyes than a strand of hair, yet we consider them a grave offense in the time of blessed prophet PBUH.” 11. Quran tells us to follow prophet Muhammad PBUH, not to follow imam Abu hanifa or sheikh so and so. They are human beings and can make mistakes. Imam Abu hanifa said that if you find a Sahih Hadith contradicting my ruling then follow the Hadith, not my ruling. Hadith is very clear and what this sheikh said is his interpretation. I would rather take a safe course and be proud to follow a sunnah instead of searching a fatwa to fit the needs of current society requirements. Islam is universal and all of its teachings apply to all times. If raising paints above ankle was culture, there would not have been so many hadiths in this topic. And 12. Muslim women are identified with hijab even in non Muslim society. Can you imagine how hard is that for women? Now I ask what happened to identity of Muslim men? These scholars have allowed to have no or smaller beard, have allowed to have pants above ankles, allowed to shake hands with women at work, allowed men not to cover their heads. Why so that we can mix in the society and not stand out. That’s double standard. Muslim men mix in and you can’t tell who is Muslim and who is non Muslim but these scholars expect women to stand out and wear hijab. Allah knows the best, I prefer to take the safe path. This also allows me to keep my pants above my ankles during Salah, this is another important issue which he did not touch upon. May Allah guide us all to keep our identity and not be afraid from anyone other than Allah.

@fatinishraquemazumdar13

4 жыл бұрын

Yes bro totally agree with u

@TheDisconnector

4 жыл бұрын

Tahmid alpha12 You can practice what you believe. I follow the way of prophet Muhammad PBUH. He had no arrogance and yet he kept his garments above ankles. Anyways that the way I think and you are free to practice what you believe. May Allah reward us both for our intentions and keep us away from satanic traps.

@TheDisconnector

4 жыл бұрын

Tahmid alpha12 It is not sunnah. There are several Hadith on this topic and the subject is clearly a commandment.

@TheDisconnector

4 жыл бұрын

Tahmid alpha12 Ameen! It’s just a matter of us Muslims taking our faith seriously. The whole world knows that Muslims don’t eat pork and drink alcohol, why? Because we put that into practice. The whole world knows that Muslims women cover their heads, why? Because we put that into practice. But the world does not know that Muslims men lower their eyes when they saw a non mahram. They don’t know the Muslims men also have a dress code such as having pants above ankles. It’s because we dont give it enough importance. We are afraid that we will stand out and will look funny. Trust me if we start practicing that then non Muslims actually respect you. I like to stand out as a Muslim. It’s my identity and want people around me to know that I am Muslim and I live my life based on teachings of Islam. I am sure that our sisters feel the same way when they start putting their hijab in public. Allah knows best and may He guide us to follow the true teachings of Islam. Ameen!

@TheDisconnector

4 жыл бұрын

Tahmid alpha12 Jazakallah brother.

One is fatwa one is taqwa

assalamoalaikum SHEIKH whats the email for questions

@carorj9080

4 жыл бұрын

I also need it

@RafaelGonzalez-hm5ej

4 жыл бұрын

Search Epic Masjid on KZread. Click on videos and find Yasir's first Q&A session. In that video they give you the email address to where can email your questions. However, he has stated that he chooses the questions based on the amount of times questions that are similar in subject have been asked, or the importance of the subject matter. I suggest you watch all his Q&A sessions on the Epic Masjid channel.

What about plucking eye brows? Now its culture so is it allowed to do so ?

@robinkhan7468

4 жыл бұрын

khadija Aktar Assalamu alaikum. If plucking the eyes is for vanity, then surely it goes against hijab. It is also a threat to health for a pathway to infection. If plucking the eyes is to make a woman not look like a man, then surely there is good intention. It is not against hijab for men that their clothing covers their skin. One must become aware that not everyone lives in hot and dry climates. Some actually live on ice. Some live in areas where insects are a threat. Also, in other locations, raised clothing is taken as being gay, poor, or mentally disabled. Or simply weird. And that doesn’t help a man to get a job in such places or a good spouse. It turns away women who would ordinarily be more approachable to a man whom is in normal dress and learn of Islam. Again as stated in this video, context must be focused on. Why was something said, then? Intention driven by pure hearts is also most important. Hope these thoughts help.

@n.a3642

2 жыл бұрын

No because that prohibition isn't in the context of culture. Don't pick and choose.

@agung_laksana

2 жыл бұрын

@khadija yasir qadhi has great detail explanation about that hadith in here kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZecucaGpajXdJM.html

JazakAllah khair Sheikh. My son's jeans always bothered me. Thanks for clarifying. It completely makes sense. I am just wondering what about during Salah? If i am not wrong its must for men to uncover ankles at that time, right?

@MubasharZia13

3 жыл бұрын

I deleted my previous comment. I would like to add that I've come to the understanding on what i know and understand, that it's the arrogance and pride that plays the part, not the clothe below the ankles. Because, if we think how the times have changed and these days the symbols of pride and arrogance are different than of those previous times. So I believe a person would be punished with the same type of treatment in the end, if he follows and adopts a certain symbol of pride and arrogance of his time.

@MubasharZia13

3 жыл бұрын

And, thus the simple question that what if a person adopts a trend of pride and arrogance of this time, which is not lowering the garment below the ankles, would he be punished like this? if yes, then it's adopting and following the certain symbols and trends of the time we're living in that would leads us to the fire of hell and a punishment in the end. So i don't think, you must uncover your ankles at the prayers time, what it tells us that praying while wearing such clothes of pride and arrogance is what shouldn't be worn in the first place.

💙💙💙

it’s very clear as to what the prophet (saw) said about the garments below the ankle .

Follow the sunnah, not the society.

Reference of Abu Hanifa incident?

My question - is it now Sunnah to put it way above the ankle?

But what if you do it but your not prideful

Bukhari 5784, 5787,5788

Alot of the ummah shows off in different ways. Through cars in definitely one of them so lets worry about that instead of the clothes.

Jarr means to drag. Whoever drags his thawb

Please mention the reference of all those people who agree that pants beneath the ankle is not haram

@fifafreebies8941

2 жыл бұрын

So ... what is the ruling on Isbaal? (extending garments below the ankle) In short: According to the majority of scholars, it is not Haram to extend your garment below your ankles (إسبال) - unless its done out of arrogance/pride/vanity (تكبر - خيلاء). That is the reason for this prohibition (علة التحريم). Some narrations mention this reason in specific, like in Sahih Bukhari (5791): مَنْ جَرَّ ثَوْبَهُ مَخِيلَةً : لَمْ يَنْظُرْ اللَّهُ إِلَيْهِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ "Whoever allows his lower garment to drag out of arrogance will find that Allah will not look at him on the Day of Resurrection." Other narrations omit this reason (علة) - but the fuqaha say all general narrations should be understood in light of this specific Hadith, due to the principle: حمل المطلق على المقيد For this reason, if an Eskimo, were to extend his garment to cover his ankles for protection against the cold - you are not going to tell him: "What is below the ankles of a the garment is in the Hellfire -‏ما أسفل من الكعبين من الإزار ففي النار". When there is no arrogance, there is no prohibition: إذا وجدت العلة وجد الحكم ، وإذا انتفت العلة انتفى الحكم "When the reason is present, the ruling is present. When the reason is absent, the ruling is absent." There are some people today who raise their garments above ankle, but then look down on others who don't - which makes them fall into the actual reason of the prohibition (علة التحريم) which they were trying to escape from in the first place : arrogance! Some people use this issue as a Taqwa-meter, so they don't pray behind an Imaam who has not raised his garment above his ankles. All of this is due to their ignorance of religion. A minority took the view that it's forbidden regardless of intention, but this view is weak. Regardless, there are heavy weights on both side, so people are free to follow whichever opinion they prefer. Nobody has the right to impose their opinion on others. --------------------------- 1- Ibn Hibaan in ("Sahih Ibn Hiban", 2/281): فَمَتَى عُدِمَتِ الْخُيَلَاءُ، لَمْ يَكُنْ بِإسْبَالِ الْإِزَارِ بَأْسٌ "In absence of arrogance/vanity, there is nothing wrong with having the garment extended below the ankles." 2- Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal in ("Masail Imam Ahmad wa Ishaaq", 3349): قلت جر الإزار وإسبال الثوب في الصلاة قال: إذا لم يرد به الخيلاء فلا بأس به، قال رسول الله:من جر ثوبه من الخيلاء Ahmad Ibn Hanbal was asked about extending the lower garment below the ankles during prayer. He replied: If it's not associated with arrogance, there is nothing wrong with this. The Prophet said: "Whoever allows his lower garment to drag out of arrogance..." 3- Ibn Taymiyah Hanbali in ("Sharh al-Umdah", 4/366): قال ابن تيمية رحمه الله: ولأن الأحاديث أكثرها مقيدة بالخيلاء فيحمل المطلق عليه, وما سوى ذلك فهو باق على الإباحة, وأحاديث النهي مبنية على الغالب والمظنة . (شرح العمدة 4/366) "Because the majority of these Ahaadith link this issue with arrogance, this issue has to be restricted to this. Whatever is outside of this remains on the original ruling of permissibility..." 4- Imaam Nawawi in ("Sharh Sahih Muslim", 14/62): قال النووي في شرح مسلم ١٤/ ٦٢ (الإسبال يكون في الإزار والقميص والعمامة، وأنه لا يجوز إسباله تحت الكعبين إن كان للخيلاء، فإن كان لغيرها فهو مكروه، وظواهر الأحاديث في تقييدها بالجر خيلاء تدل على أن التحريم مخصوص بالخيلاء، وهكذا نص الشافعى على الفرق كما ذكرنا ...فما نزل عن الكعبين فهو ممنوع، فإن كان للخيلاء فهو ممنوع منع تحريم، والا فمنع تنزيه، وأما الأحاديث المطلقة بأن ما تحت الكعبين في النار فالمراد بها ما كان للخيلاء، لأنه مطلق فوجب حمله على المقيد، قال القاضي: قال العلماء وبالجملة يكره كل مازاد على الحاجة والمعتاد في اللباس من الطول والسعة). "It is not permissible to extend any clothes below the ankles out of arrogance. If it's done for other than this, it's Makrooh (disliked).... The apparent meaning of the narrations restrict this issue to arrogance/pride, which proofs that the prohibition is also restricted to arrogance... With regards to the narrations which speak in general, they have to be understood in light of those narrations that speak in specific..." 5- al-Baji Maliki in 'al-Muntaqa' (9/314): قال في المنتقى(9/314- 315): «وقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم الذي يجر ثوبه خيلاء يقتضي تعلق هذا الحكم بمن جره خيلاء، أما من جره لطول ثوب لا يجد غيره، أو عذر من الأعذار فإنه لا يتناوله الوعيد "And the Prophet's statement: "Whoever drags his garment out of arrogance...", means that this ruling has to be restricted to whoever drags it out of arrogance. But if someone drags it because the garment is too long and can't find another, or for some other reason - then this threat of punishment does not apply to him." 6- Badrudin al-'Ayini Hanafi in 'Umdat al-Qari' (21/229): وقال العيني في شرحه للبخاري ٢١/ ٢٢٩ ((باب من جر إزاره من غير خيلاء) أي: هذا باب في بيان حكم من جر إزاره من غير قصد التخييل، فإنه لا بأس به من غير كراهة، وكذلك يجوز لدفع ضرر يحصل له، كأن يكون تحت كعبيه جراح أو حكة أو نحو ذلك، إن لم يغطها تؤذيه الهوام كالذباب ونحوه بالجلوس عليها، ولا يجد ما يسترها به إلا إزاره أو ردائه أو قميصه، وهذا كما يجوز كشف العورة للتداوي وغير ذلك من الأسباب المبيحة للترخص [Imam Bukhari] Chapter on whoever extends the garment WITHOUT PRIDE/ARROGANCE [Badrudin Ayni comments]: "Imam Bukhari made this chapter to explain the ruling on the one who drags his garment without intending vanity/pride. There is nothing wrong with this - it's not even disliked..." 7- Ibn Abdul-Barr Maliki in 'al-Tamheed' (3/244): قال في التمهيد : (3/244) «... وهذا الحديث يدل على أن من جر إزاره من غير خيلاء ولا بطر أنه لا يلحقه الوعيد المذكور غير أن جر الإزار والقميص وسائر الثياب مذموم على كل حال،وأما المستكبر الذي يجر ثوبه فهو الذي ورد فيه ذلك الوعيد الشديد ...». "This narration shows that the one who drags his garment for other than pride and arrogance, then he is not subject to this warning/threat (of punishment), even though dragging any type of clothes is wrong in all cases. But this severe threat/warning (of punishment) is only applicable to the arrogant one, who drags his garment out of arrogance." 8- al-Qastalaani al-Shafi'ee in 'Irshaad al-Saari' (21/418): القسطلاني في شرحه على البخاري ، قال : "وهذا الإطلاق محمول على ما ورد من قيد الخيلاء ، وقد نص الشافعي - رحمه الله - على أن التحريم مخصوص بالخيلاء، فإن لم يكن للخيلاء كره للتنزيه" [إرشاد الساري لشرح صحيح البخاري ج21 ص418 ط دار الكتب العربية ببيروت -لبنان] . "And this general statement needs to be understood in light of the specific ones, which restrict this matter to pride/arrogance. Imaam Shaafi'ie has said that this prohibition is specific to when it's associated with pride/arrogance. If there is no pride/arrogance, then it's disliked (Makroh Tanzihi)." 9- In "Badhl Al-Majhud", (16/411): العلامة السهرنفوري في شرحه لسنن أبي داود ، قال : "قال العلماء المستحب في الإزار والثوب إلى نصف الساقين ، والجائز بلا كراهة ما تحته إلى الكعبين ، فما نزل عن الكعبين فهو ممنوع ، فإن كان للخيلاء فهو ممنوع منع تحريم ، وإلا فمنع تنزيه" [خليل أحمد السهرنفوري بذل المجهود في حل أبي داود ج16 ص411 ط دار الكتب العلمية] "If this is done out of pride/arrogance, then it's discouraged because it's Haram. If not, it's discouraged Tanzihi.

@clothesforeveryone8000

2 жыл бұрын

@@fifafreebies8941 jazakallah brother

@fifafreebies8941

2 жыл бұрын

@@clothesforeveryone8000 I have some more references as well . Should I send them

@fifafreebies8941

2 жыл бұрын

10- Ibn Qudamah Hanbali in 'al-Mughni' (2/298): قال ابن قدامة في المغني (2/298): ويكره إسبال القميص والإزار والسراويل؛ لأن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أمر برفع الإزار، فإن فعل ذلك على وجه الخيلاء حرام." "It is disliked to extend garments and pants below the ankles, because the Prophet commanded us to raise our garments. If it's done out of arrogance, then it becomes Haram." 11- In 'Subul al-Salam', (4/158): سبل السلام (4/158):" وتقييد الحديث بالخيلاء دال بمفهومه أنه لا يكون من جره غير خيلاء داخلا في الوعيد . وقد صرح به ما أخرج البخاري وأبو داود والنسائي أنه قال أبو بكر رضي الله عنه لما سمع هذا الحديث: إن إزاري يسترخي إلا أن أتعاهده، فقال له صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم:"إنك لست ممن يفعله خيلاء" ، وهو دليل على اعتبار المفاهيم من هذا النوع.اهـ "The Hadith specifically restricts it to "arrogance/pride", this shows that if arrogance is not associated with this act, then this threat/warning (of punishment) does not apply to it." 12- Al-Munaawi in 'Faydh al-Qadir': وجاء في فيض القدير للمناوي: (والمسبل إزاره) الذي يطوّل ثوبه ويرسله إذا مشى تيهاً وفخراً (خيلاء) أي يقصد الخيلاء بخلافه لا بقصدها ولذلك رخص المصطفى صلى اللّه عليه وسلم في ذلك لأبي بكر حيث كان جره لغير الخيلاء "(Out of arrogance)", meaning he intends pride/arrogance, contrary to someone who doesn't intend this. That's why the Prophet made an exception for Abu Bakr, when his garment would extend without arrogance." 13- al-Sindi in 'Hashiyah': وقال السندي في حاشيته على (سنن النسائي) في شرح حديث" ثلاثة لا يكلمهم الله... ومنهم المسبل": "المسبل" من الإسبال بمعنى الإرخاء عن الحد الذي ينبغي الوقوف عنده والمراد إذا كان عن مخيلة والله تعالى أعلم . و في حاشيته على ( البخاري4/ 24 ) قال معلقًا على حديث " ما أسفل من الكعبين فهو في النار" : أي إذا كان ذلك خيلاء . [Hadith] Three people God will not talk to ... the one who drags his garment below ankles. [al-Sindi comments]: "... this means when it's associated with arrogance, and God knows best." 14- Imaam al-Bahuti Hanbali in 'Kashaf al-Qinaa' (1/277): وقال البهوتي (كشف القناع /ج1/277/دار الفكر): وهو أي الإسبال كبيرة للوعيد عليه الآتي بيانه في الخبر إسبال شيء من ثيابه ولو عمامة خيلاء لقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم من جر ثوبه خيلاء لم ينظر الله إليه متفق عليه وحديث ابن مسعود من أسبل إزاره في صلاته خيلاء فليس من الله في حل ولا حرام رواه أبو داود حرب لما روي أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم حين رأى بعض أصحابه يمشي بين الصفين يختال في مشيته قال إنها المشية يبغضها الله إلا في هذا الموطن وذلك لأن مذموم في الحرب فإن أسبل ثوبه لحاجة كستر ساق قبيح خيلاء أبيح قال أحمد في رواية حنبل جر الإزار وإسبال الرداء في الصلاة إذا لم يرد الخيلاء فلا بأس ما لم يرد التدليس على النساء فإنه من الفحش وفي الخبر من غشنا فليس منا ومثله أي التدليس بإسبال ثوبه لستر ساق قبيح ك قصيرة اتخذت رجلين من خشب فلم تعرف ذكره في الفروع توجيها ويكره أن يكون ثوب الرجل إلى فوق نصف ساقه نص عليه وتحت كعبه بلا حاجة وعنه ما تحتهما فهو في النار للخبر فإن كان لحاجة كقبح ساقه فلا و لا يكره ما بين ذلك أي بين نصف الساق وفوق الكعب أ.ه He mentions the narration of Imam Ahmad when he ruled that if some extends his lower garment or cloak during prayer, then there is nothing wrong with this, if this is without arrogance. 15- Imam al-Suyuti Shafi'ee in 'Tanwir' and 'Dibaj': و قال السيوطي في ( تنوير الحوالك 1/217 ) : " ما أسفل من ذلك " ، (ما) موصولة و (أسفل) بالنصب خبر كان محذوفة والجملة صلة . ويجوزكون (ما) شرطية و (أسفل) فعل ماض . (ففي النار) أي محله من الرجل وذلك خاص بمن قصد به الخيلاء . و في ( الديباج 1/121) : " المسبل إزاره المرخي له الجار طرفيه خيلاء فهو مخصص بالحديث الآخر "لا ينظر الله إلى من جر ثوبه خيلاء " ، وقد رخص في ذلك لأبي بكر حيث كان جره لغير الخيلاء ." "This ruling is specific for someone who intends arrogance with it..." "And the Prophet made an exception for Abu Bakr when he wasn't doing this with arrogance." 16- Imam Ibn Battal al-Maliki said under the commentary of hadith of Abu Bakr وفى حديث أبى بكر بيان أن سقط ثوبه بغير قصده وفعله ولم يقصد بذلك الخيلاء فإنه لا حرج عليه فى ذلك، لقوله عليه السلام لأبى بكر: (لست ممن يصنعه خيلاء) ألا ترى أن النبى عليه السلام جر ثوبه حين استعجل المسير إلى صلاة الخسوف، وهو مبين لأمته بقوله وفعله. وقد كان ابن عمر يكره أن يجر الرجل ثوبه على كل حال وهذه من شدائد ابن عمر، لأنه لم تخف عليه قصة أبى بكر وهو الراوى لها، والحجة فى السنة لا فى ما خلفها "It is mentioned in the hadith of Abu Bakr that his lower garment came down without intention and his plan was not arrogance in this practice, there was no harm in it because Prophet peace be upon him said to Abu Bakr: “You are not one of those who do that out of conceit.” Don’t you see that Prophet peace be upon him got up dragging his garment (on the ground) hurriedly for the prayer of eclipse. He peace be upon him cleared for his Ummah with his sayings and practice that without arrogance this is allowed…. [Sharah Saheeh al Bukhari 9/87]. 17- Qadhi Iyaad al-Maaliki in his commentary of Sahih Muslim: معلقاً على حديث ابن عمر لا ينظر الله عز وجل يوم القيامة إلى من جر ثوبه خيلاء « تخصيص جره على وجه الخيلاء يدل على أن من جره لغير ذلك فليس بداخل تحت الوعيد وقد رخص في ذلك النبي خ لأبى بكر الصديق ا وقال :(لست منهم) إذ كان جره إياه لغير الخيلاء "This hadith is did takhsees of a general hadith of dragging the garments that it is for the one who do it out of pride, and who does this without pride he does not come under this warning, because Prophet peace be upon him gave concession to Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) that: “You are not one of them. i.e., those who let the garment hang down out of pride. " ("Ikmal al Muallim", 1/257). 18- Ibn Muflih Hanbali said: قَالَ صَاحِبُ الْمُحِيطِ مِنْ الْحَنَفِيَّةِ وَرُوِيَ أَنَّ أَبَا حَنِيفَةَ - رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ - ارْتَدَى بِرِدَاءٍ ثَمِينٍ قِيمَتُهُ أَرْبَعُمِائَةِ دِينَارٍ وَكَانَ يَجُرُّهُ عَلَى الْأَرْضِ فَقِيلَ لَهُ أَوَلَسْنَا نُهِينَا عَنْ هَذَا؟ فَقَالَ إنَّمَا ذَلِكَ لِذَوِي الْخُيَلَاءِ وَلَسْنَا مِنْهُمْ، وَاخْتَارَ الشَّيْخُ تَقِيُّ الدِّينِ - رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ - عَدَمَ تَحْرِيمِهِ وَلَمْ يَتَعَرَّضْ لِكَرَاهَةٍ وَلَا عَدَمِهَا. "Author of al Muheet among the Hanafiyah said that: Abu Haneefah (may Allaah be pleased with him) wore an expansive rida’ and let it drag on the ground. It was said to him: Are we not forbidden to do this? He said: That is for those who show off and we are not among them. Shaykh Taqiy al-Deen (Ibn Taymiyah) favoured the view that it is not haraam, but he did not mention whether it is makrooh or not." [al-Adaab al-Shar’iyyah (3/521)]

@clothesforeveryone8000

2 жыл бұрын

@@fifafreebies8941 why not dude.share with us

brother u need to give the correct info

Thank you for explain it for me It's not the action that forbidden the way we feel when we doing it , that's no acceptable

Ppl are dying and starving around the world and we are focused on talking about halal food and length of pants 👖

@sirajkhan5343

3 жыл бұрын

May i know kind sir what is your contribution to save the dying and the starving around the world

@balibhai420

3 жыл бұрын

@@sirajkhan5343 I'm folding my pants

@n.a3642

2 жыл бұрын

@@balibhai420 😂😂😂

What you do pls tell us

This message is to individuals who want to accept Islam the peaceful religion for humanity / sometimes I have to work outdoors in freezing cold winter temperatures I'm making intention to follow Quran and Sunna we as muslims and human beings must teach forgiveness to humanity & to encourage compassion to show mercy to care for the young and elderly to teach to the people humanity needs forgiveness I think Islam is a peaceful religion forgiveness is obligatory and the sharia is forgiveness let's not forget what I'm saying / Jesus alahi wasalam peace and blessings be upon him spoke to the people saying GOD is greater than I / GOD ALMIGHTY is one alone and without partners and there is none equal to GOD there is none worthy to be worshipped but GOD and prophet Muhammad rasullulla salla la hu a la hi wa salaam peace and blessings be upon him is the last and final messenger of GOD ALMIGHTY ALLAH supana wata ALLAH supana llah /

How can I ask yasir qadhi??? Sm body plz give his email id

Sir in our generation keeping the pants above the ankles is kinda fashion now a days and you can say it a sign of pride or arrogance. Now what to do can we lower the pant from our ankle while we are not intended to take pride or arrogance in it? plzzzz answer

@DrWoofOfficial

Ай бұрын

The video says you can lower it

In prayer since I don’t do it out of pride do I still need to put it above my ankles ?

@lalthangHungyos

4 жыл бұрын

While praying? Hum we don't do it bro.

Does this apply to females? Please if someone can advise.

@Khan-ih8qr

4 жыл бұрын

Imagine a wedding dress that's expensive usually they go below the ankles. According to yasir qadhis explanation that would be haram because you would be flaunting your wealth by wearing a lengthy wedding dress looking like some queen

@rahilhashmani

4 жыл бұрын

Shaz Faz nope

@rahilhashmani

4 жыл бұрын

Shaz Faz a women is permissible to even hide its nail

@rahilhashmani

4 жыл бұрын

You can and should where it below the knees

Thank you for your logical answer. I listen to you every time and like your videos, but today, I completely disagree with you in this matter.

there is no such a hadith which is bound to particular time and particular culture...all of halal/haram hadith valid tll the resurrection day around the world...though there might be argument about Hadith authenticity.. but that's another issue..but anyway i like Dr. Yasir qadhi very much

@nabilelshukri

4 жыл бұрын

This is not a halal and haram Hadith. This is a Hadith of a particular statements of the prophet s.a.w. for a particular practice. And actions are based on intentions. Unfortunately, Muslims today claim to follow the sunnah by copying the Hadiths physical aspects word for word. And the lessons and wisdom of the prophet S.A.W. Passes them over their head. They grow the beard and raise their garment but don’t smile in your face and speak to everyone harshly. the characteristic sunnah has been forgotten because it’s difficult to fake because it is a reflection of the heart.

The point we are missing from the hadith of Abu Baker is that, Abu Baker himself is exerting effort to keep his cloth above the ankle. It is like the Prophet was saying to him, you are not of those who draw their garment out of pride because you are doing all you could to keep it up. Ibn Masood also did it to cover defects. What is our own excuse not to follow this hadith if not pride. The Sheikh would have make sense if his explanation is that if a condition beyond your control is forcing your garment below ankle, there is no sin on you. Looking at the various wordings of the hadith, it is clear that keeping the garment off the ankle is one of the features that should distinguish Muslims. We are not a moderate nation because we tone down our religion to suit circumstances, we are a moderate nation because we are proud of Allah's injunction and we show that Allah's injunctions is relevant to all time and place. No doubt, western thoughts, environment and culture do influence some scholars whether they know it, accept it or not. The statement that because there is scarcity of clothes during the time of the Prophet, hence it is more appropriate that the garment should not be below the ankles. This is the interpretation of the speaker, this explanation is not found in any of the wordings of the hadith. I advise people to not to accept anything because yasir Qadhi says it, we have more knowledgeable, reputable scholars, who are not affected by western thought that hold a contrary opinion. And the majority view in our time now among Muslim scholars including the speaker's teachers is that it is haram to draw garment below the ankle.

@016karma

4 жыл бұрын

Mr. Yasir is very wrong on this topic.

@016karma

4 жыл бұрын

When ummahs blood is shedding all corner of the world. He choose this time to engage a debate in this issue?! I want to know his intention.

@leun6768

4 жыл бұрын

The majority view among scholars it that it's permissible so please don't lie and go and repent

@faysalahmed9157

3 жыл бұрын

The prophet (saw) prohibited for a reason because of pride and indicated that if the pride is not there then it's not prohibited. He (saw) said to Abu Bakr: “You are not one of those who do it out of pride.” We know what is pride clearly from the prophetic hadith that it's to deny the truth and look down on people (sahih Muslim) One of the contemporary scholars- Sh. Sulayman al Majid beautifully explains here: "It should not be argued that Abû Bakr’s blameless ness was due only to the fact that his waistcloth slipped down unintentionally. This narrow reading is unsupported. The Prophet (peace be upon him) did not say to Abû Bakr: “Do not worry about it because you did not let it slip on purpose.” Rather, he reiterated the matter of pride, and said to Abû Bakr that he was not doing so out of pride. Therefore, the reason for the prohibition is pride, and the ruling therefore only exists when its reason is present. In the absence of pride, there is no prohibition" What Sh Yasir Qadhi said is in line with majority of the classical scholars. Wearing garments below ankles is NOT prohibited according to MAJORITY of scholars of the 4 madhabs: According to school of Imam Abu Haneefah: Imam Abu Haneefah (RA) wore an expansive rida’ (shawl) and let it drag on the ground. It was said to him: "Are we not forbidden to do this?: He said: "That is for those who show off and we are not among them" [Source: al-Fataawa al-Hindiyyah (5/333)]. According to school of Imam Shaafi (ra): Imam al-Shaafi (RA) said: It is not permissible to let the garment hang low when praying or otherwise in order to show off. As for letting the garment hang low for reasons other than showing off when praying, it is not as serious, because of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) when he told him that his izaar slipped down on one side: “You are not one of them (i.e., those who let the garment hang down out of pride).” [Source: Quoted by Imam al-Nawawi in al-Majmoo’ (3/177] According to school of Imam Malik (ra): In Shaykh Al-‘Adawi’s commentary on the Risala of Ibn Abi Zayd, he discusses the two opinions in the Maliki madhab one prohibiting the matter and the other considering it disliked. He says, “In conclusion, there are varying narrations about this matter if the garment is worn below the ankle without the intention of arrogance. According to the conclusion of Al-Hattab, there is no prohibition, rather it is disliked. According to the school of Imam Ahmed hanbal (ra): This is indeed the opinion of most scholars, as well as one of the two views on the topic expressed Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (RA) According to the Hanbalis, as is found in the books Al-Iqnaa’ and Al-Mughni, it is considered disliked but not forbidden. Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah (RA) is of the view that the general Ahadeeth that prohibit wearing clothes below the ankle are restricted by the Ahadeeth that prohibit doing so out of pride and arrogance. Therefore, if wearing clothes below the ankle is for the purpose of pride and showing off, then this is forbidden, and if it is not for this purpose, then it is not forbidden. For more benefit, you may refer to the book of Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah entitled Sharh Al-'Umdah.

أخرجه أحمد : حدثنا محمد بن عبد الرحمن الطفاوي حدثنا أيوب عن زيد ابن أسلم عن ابن عمر قال: ”دخلت على النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، وعلي إزار يتقعقع، فقال: من هذا؟ قلت: عبد الله بن عمر، قال: إن كنت عبد الله فارفع إزارك، فرفعت إزاري إلى نصف الساقين، فلم تزل إزرته حتى مات“ وفي الحديث دلالة ظاهرة على أنه يجب على المسلم أن لا يطيل إزاره إلى ما دون الكعبين، بل يرفعه إلى ما فوقهما، وإن كان لا يقصد الخيلاء، ففيه رد واضح على بعض المشايخ الذين يطيلون ذيول جببهم حتى تكاد أن تمس الأرض، ويزعمون أنهم لا يفعلون ذلك خيلاء! فهلا تركوه اتباعا لأمر رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم بذلك لابن عمر، أم هم أصفى قلبا من ابن عمر؟ ! ___________________________________ 📖 كتاب سلسلة الأحاديث الصحيحة وشيء من فقهها وفوائدها ج:٤، ص:٩٥ - - المكتبة الشاملة الحديثة

I am more confused 🧐

Jaabir ibn Sulaym said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to me: Beware of wearing ones lower garment below the ankles, because this is a kind of showing-off, and Allaah does not love showing-off." (Regarded as saheeh by al-Tirmidhi, no. 2722). No one is able to be completely free of pride and arrogance, even if he claims that this is so. Such a claim is unacceptable, because by saying it, he is praising himself. Only in the case of those whom the wahy (revelation) testified that they were free of pride do we believe that this is the case. For example, there is a hadeeth which states that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever trails his garment on the ground out of pride, Allaah will not look at him on the Day of Resurrection." Abu Bakr said to him, "O Messenger of Allaah, my izaar slips down if I do not pay attention to it." He said: "You are not one of those who do it out of pride." (Reported by al-Bukhaari, no. 5784) What indicates that isbaal is prohibited even if it is not done out of pride is the hadeeth of Abu Saeed al-Khudri, may Allaah be pleased with him, who said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: The lower garment of the Muslim should come down to mid-calf, but there is nothing wrong if it is between that point and the ankles. Whatever is lower than the ankles is in the Fire. Whoever trails his garment on the ground out of pride, Allaah will not look at him." (Reported by Abu Dawud, no. 4093, with a saheeh isnaad.) These ahaadeeth describe two different deeds, for which there will be two different punishments: Imaam Ahmad reported that Abd al-Rahmaan ibn Yaqoob said: "I asked Abu Saeed: Did you hear anything from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) concerning the izaar (lower garment)? he said, Yes, listen! The izaar of the believer should come to mid-calf, although there is nothing wrong if it comes between there and the ankles, but whatever is lower than the ankles is in the Fire, and he said it three times." Ibn Umar said: "I passed by the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and my izaar had slipped down. He said, O Abdullaah, pull up your izaar! so I pulled it up. He said, More! so I pulled it up more, and always made sure it was pulled up properly after that." Some people asked, "To where did you pull it up?" He said, "To mid-calf length." (Reported by Muslim, no. 2086; al-Dhahabi, Kitaab al-Kabaair, 131-132)

@ibniftikhar

4 жыл бұрын

The last are especially strong proofs refuting Yasir Qadhi's generalizations in the video. He needs to fear Allah and cease from misleading people in this and other issues.

@blazeit4905

4 жыл бұрын

@@ibniftikhar He said that if in a society it is a norm that the izzar is below the ankle and you are the one who has it above the ankle,then it is like you are the one who is showing off?. He gave so many examples . But really akhi I'm confused. Just try to be sincere to Allah and do good as much as possible and hope for mercy of Allah. It is in the human nature to differ between. Please don't say something bad about one because we don't know in how much waters we are. May Allah forgive us.

@ibniftikhar

4 жыл бұрын

@@blazeit4905 that means if any of the traits of Islam is not the norm anymore (e.g., beard, hijab, etc.) we leave it out of fear of arrogance? Where did he get this principle? Please read the book that I have posted on this thread. Perhaps, it will shed more light and remove any confusion. May Allah save us all from arrogance.

@blazeit4905

4 жыл бұрын

@@ibniftikhar There is so many fitna and confusion nowadays. It is really hard to stay firm. But Indeed,It is my eman that if you pray to Allah to guide you sincerely , he will never let you to be led astray. Ya Allah forgive us and admit us into Jannah tul firdaus. Aamiin. Brother hope to meet you in jannah : )

@emze563

4 жыл бұрын

@@ibniftikhar hijab and beard have nothing to do with societal perceptions. And the garment position was necessary for that time, not because of the garment but because of the intention. Obviously

Then the test to check for presence or absence of pride would be : Try yourself to wear trousers above your ankle. What comes in mind of sincere people would be happiness of following sunnah and on the other side (absence of pride 😂) would be guess ;???

@talksense6648

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely true , Yasir Qadhi misrepresented the Hadith

@delaman4991

3 жыл бұрын

We live in a time where short trousers are not normal place amongst people and in fact they mock that. It’s not sunnah to wear pants at all in the style of today so why compare? it is not pride to not want to be mocked by people, Islam came to honour the Muslims, why would you open your self to fitna and harm did something that isn’t meant by the Hadith? A Muslim doesn’t even run when he is late to salah because of dignity, we are not like monks or Buddhists who think humiliation is a good thing, humility and humiliation are very different learn it akhi. This is not the purpose of our deen, nor is it required or praise worthy rather the honour and dignity of a Muslim being maintained is praiseworthy. As the sheikh said if it was the sharia we would the care we would do it, but you’ll find nothing in the deen of Allah STW that exposes us to mockery or humiliation as mentioned Islam was sent to honour the Muslims. Allahu’alim

@faysalahmed9157

3 жыл бұрын

@@talksense6648 The prophet (saw) prohibited for a reason because of pride and indicated that if the pride is not there then it's not prohibited. He (saw) said to Abu Bakr: “You are not one of those who do it out of pride.” We know the definition of pride clearly from the prophetic hadith that it's to deny the truth and look down on people (sahih Muslim) One of the contemporary explained: "It should not be argued that Abû Bakr’s blameless ness was due only to the fact that his waistcloth slipped down unintentionally. This narrow reading is unsupported. The Prophet (peace be upon him) did not say to Abû Bakr: “Do not worry about it because you did not let it slip on purpose.” Rather, he reiterated the matter of pride, and said to Abû Bakr that he was not doing so out of pride. Therefore, the reason for the prohibition is pride, and the ruling therefore only exists when its reason is present. In the absence of pride, there is no prohibition"

@talksense6648

3 жыл бұрын

@@faysalahmed9157 haha please don't make Sunnah optional my dear brother. Do not follow what you like or not. Why not to follow prophet Muhammad (saw) and his companions instead of making our own theories what would have been the situation. Do you really think that The people like Abu Bakar had been deal with even a little amount of pride? Do you really think that is why he was putting it above ankle just because he had pride?? Really? There would not have been the need of thinks Hadith for Companions like Abu Bakar or Ali etc... So when they followed the Hadith and were putting pents or whatever above ankles. You think you people will come out of the theory of your own to justify what Sheik Yasir or others are doing? Well a fatwa is regarded as Sahih/correct as long as majority of the scholars agree upon it. Now please go and check out what is the view of majority of the scholars on this issue. "AtiyulAllah wa AtiyuRasul." I found this necessary to reply you, otherwise I am really worried that we are discussing the issue which Dr Yasir should have explained beautifuly. But unfortunately, sometimes we understand the Hadith according to our own satisfaction. May Allah(swt) give us the true understanding of his Deen🌻