What a monochromatic world it would be without such resources as the Essentia Foundation and its quorum of brilliant and informed thinkers. Thank you all.🧡

@rossmcleod7983

3 ай бұрын

Well said !

@youtubebane7036

3 ай бұрын

Bernard the reason you are you is because that is your identity. That is the one thing that only you possesses that nobody else does out of an infinite number of infinite for an infinite number of eternities. Even when this most prized possession that is your own self is shared as it always is with infinity because you are part of it there is still that little part that is you because that is the only one that there is that is you completely unique 100% One of a kind for all Infiniti of Infiniti of eternity an existence is you are the only one of these things that there will ever be whether you're an atheist or religious that is a fact both ways. There's only one of you that will ever be and there's only one of you that's ever been and that is a completely unique thing that will never be replicated or reproduced anywhere else. That is what people don't understand identity is the very first thing besides movement.

@seanmcdonough8815

3 ай бұрын

Interesting to read this comment when I just came up with my thought that if you go back far enough, time was just a color, Everything was fine.... Then nothing happened,; has been happening at the speed of light ever since

Thank you for hosting this conference. Though I am just a curious layman, I find that these inquiries and discussions add value to all of us even if I am just barely able to understand the ideas presented. It leaves me in awe and stretches my mind

The inconsistency and uniqueness of Smolin’s slides is truly a work of art 😂

Time as a Superposition in Higher Dimensions: This notion suggests that our perception of time as a linear progression may be an oversimplification of a more complex reality. Instead of time unfolding linearly as we experience it, it could exist in a superposition state within higher-dimensional spaces. In this view, time would not flow strictly from past to future but could encompass multiple potential timelines or configurations simultaneously. Elaboration: Consider time as a dimension similar to the three spatial dimensions we perceive, but with additional dimensions beyond our comprehension. In this framework, time could exist in a superposition of states, analogous to how quantum particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously until observed. From our limited perspective, we perceive time as progressing linearly, but in higher-dimensional reality, time may exhibit a more intricate structure, encompassing multiple possibilities and configurations.

@user-hj8uo1zl6k

3 ай бұрын

A discussion along similar lines can be found in the paper "On the Quantization of Gravity by Embedding Space-time in a Higher Dimensional Space", Classical and Quantum Gravity 2 (1985) 869 and some other subsequent papers of mine.

Awesome, was really looking forward to this one. Much appreciated guys/gals!

I’m sooooo happy these conversations are happening! I just wish they had been when I was in academia years ago and I had been a part of it! So grateful to the Essentia Foundation for putting this out there to keep us all thinking and wondering and delighting in the journey!

This is so good, many thanks. Keeping Don Hoffman and Bernardo Kastrup in the wings, ready for the next one....hopefully...

All truth is relative and dynamical. Change is absolutely fundamental. Patterns of change ( in magnitude and angle) manifest in infinite dimensions as energy, matter, consciousness, and the passage of time. The world of everyday experience is , given the constraints, a three - dimensional sum over histories in the infinite.

Glad you guys got George Ellis

That was very nice!! Awesome debate and I am always learning new things!!!❤❤

Maybe consciousness originates in a higher or lower dimension and so it may not be included in our theory of everything in our dimension. And maybe time is actually in a superposition in a higher dimension and we perceive it linear in ours.

@HarryAcorns

3 ай бұрын

Get your head out of the clouds. 😉

@user-ji1zr7mz1t

3 ай бұрын

@@HarryAcorns 😶‍🌫️ I do enjoy to theorize about such topics.

@blijebij

2 ай бұрын

I totally agree on your last line, that is an interesting perspective. Nevertheless, I think we totally have a wrong view on what Time truly is. It is a bit like the label curved SpaceTime, as a teen what did that induce inside my imagination, well that SpaceTime is a fabric of something whats however. So something is really curved physically. I think the same effect plays on us for Time, we experience it as a Dimension on it self. I do not believe that is the case however. What am I sure of, that we humans are very conditioned, more then we like to admit probably.

@user-ji1zr7mz1t

2 ай бұрын

@@blijebij censored by the human perception of reality.

Excellent.... thanks 🙏.

Bernardo, Thank you. You have my sincere respect and gratitude for the work you have done. You have made a tremendous impact on my understanding of important philosophical concepts concerning the nature of reality.

The Escher hands imply that the experiencer creates the experience that is then experienced in a recursive loop out of which reality rises.

@James-ll3jb

3 ай бұрын

Trivial.

@michaelodriscoll

3 ай бұрын

The experience is the experiencer, know Thyself. Namaste 🙏

@dimitrispapadimitriou5622

3 ай бұрын

M.C. Escher was not a mystic or Idealist. On the contrary... He had expressed his point of view about such things...

@goran586

3 ай бұрын

@@dimitrispapadimitriou5622 That may well be true, but once a work of art has left the artist's hand, he loses his exclusive right to its metaphorical implications, which are in the eye of the beholder.

I enjoyed = The Setting of the talk felt very traditional and was welcoming and warming. The Guests where amazing and every one was epic and information presented in the time given was amazingly compacted by each guest very well, finally the topic did center on TIME but I was happy it felt very investigative and thus not to dismiss all areas of our reality, like philosophy, psychology, physics, and so many more subjects involved it was great!

Is it a variation of where a 'cut' occurs? The event of activity of a participant (of any participantly available scale) determines (in a scalar way) experiencable change (at scale of participant)? inherently? All 'is' as registering of change? And therefore a constant & complexly participantly unique registering of activity/change but only ever referential or indicative at scale of participant register?

Thanks for the talk

26:30 ... and what about hypothetical spacetimes that expanding and then contracing to a Big Crunch? These also have a global arrow of time.

It would be interesting to hear the panel's view on the Free will theorem by Kochen and Conway

An interesting aside to the specious time idea is the great American baseball player who claimed back in the 40's, when he played the game, that time "slowed down for him to the point that he could see the rotation of the ball as it approached and could react to it in ways that others couldn't. Interestingly he claimed to be able to smell the impact of the ball against the bat the horsehide of the ball striking his bat. Many have claimed he was full of it, but there is little doubt he was most likely the greatest hitter of all time. And perhaps his explanation is an example of this phenomena.

Great discussion.. simply great

Been reading some Heidegger and Bergson lately. What a timely recommendation.

nesting of time provides choice of emotion and abstraction as well as experiencing consciousness?

what could be objective time for physical reality / universe? can ratio of dark energy expansion of space and age of universe be used to develop objective time?

quantum wave function measured in present when expansion of space pulls classic past away?

might branching in quantum time be based on conscious experience rather than choice?

how is causation described in five dimension brane?

what momentum is fundamental?

Thank you for a brilliant time listening to experts about what else time. It’s one of many topics that has had conscious humanity puzzled, but certainly one of the few that really does get the philosophical mind going. Three dimensional space , time and energy, keep delving deep into our conscious minds

The quality of the recent videos is amazing! Keep up the good work.

is quantum mechanics needed to make observations of past? the past has both classical and quantum?

The issue of 'separate identity' and the fundamental privacy of personal experience in the context of that which is inaccessible and internal is addressed in the work on 'quantum information' by Federico Faggin and G Mauro D'Ariano which also has deep implications for an understanding of time as a fundamental mediator of trans-action within the hidden relational realm of the quantum substratum. Which can be found in a paper titled 'Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach' co-authored by Faggin and D'Ariano which incorporates quantum information.

Bernard Carr is also (such) a great guy !

This conference would have profited from Chris Langan’s cognitive theoretic model of the universe (CTMU). But great discussion.

Why do we corroborate each other’s experience? Under classical physics, the simplest explanation was that mentality is a map of physical territory. With QM, the Born Rule, Bell’s inequality, the invocation of internal symmetries in abstract Hilbert space, etc, this hypothesis of a physical world to explain our mutual corroboration is the no longer the simplest one; in fact it's become impossibly complicated (many worlds etc). Maybe QM suggests that we’ve been confusing the map and the territory. Maybe the realm of Mind/Qualia/Experience is the territory, and QM is the map, and then there’s no remaining impetus to invoke anything physical/objective at all. I suspect the mathematical models of physics are the best-yet attempt for predicting our mutual corroborations/constraints in a purely mental domain, and that's it. I wonder more people don’t entertain this “zero worlds” idea. This view is entirely scientific, if you reframe science as the most sophisticated and rigorous method for prediction of experience, rather than any description of a "natural world".

does the expansion of space have a role inomentum of objects?

is quantum mechanics needed for the future, and is the future needed to start universe?

when you time your perfect clock(subatomic) with the perfect time(a proper conjunction) of the universe you will start to understand the connection to all matter when the mind finds and remembers it can finally grasp the infinite

Strange to talk about time without having a model for how it works e.g. is it quantic ,is it stokastisk, with what process does it affect things or...... if we remove time from Einsteins equation we find that mass compress space and that time go slower as the space is compressed. There are no curvature in space only in time and space.

In realms where physics intertwines with thought, Where time's elusive dance is deeply wrought, The scholars gather, minds ablaze, to ponder, The mysteries of time, its spell we're under. Einstein's legacy, a towering might, Yet shadows linger, questions taking flight, Was he mistaken, in his grasp of time's embrace? Or does the truth reside in a subtler space? Newton's clockwork universe, precise and grand, With time as a river, flowing at its hand, But relativity whispers, bending the stream, A dance of spacetime, in a cosmic dream. Quantum mysteries, where particles entwine, In a dance of uncertainty, where time may redefine, Do they hold the key to consciousness's sway, Or is there more to time than we dare say? The second law, a decree of entropy's reign, A arrow of time, flowing against the grain, Yet within our minds, does time find its home, A subjective journey, where moments roam? Idealism's gaze, casting shadows long, Philosophical ponderings, a timeless song, Neurophysics, psychology, the mind's terrain, In search of answers, through each winding lane. Essentia Foundation, a beacon bright, Guiding seekers through the depths of night, In the convergence of minds, a symphony plays, Time and consciousness, in an endless maze. So let us journey, with open minds unfurled, Exploring the mysteries of this time-bound world, For in the union of science and thought, we find, The essence of existence, in the tapestry of Time and Mind.

an infinite time of consciousness would be of different character (subjective?) than objective nature of physical reality, emotional energy, and abstract thought?

nesting within objective time to emotional level to abstract level to conscious level?

I wish the subtitles were fully complete...

@donahunt832

3 ай бұрын

yes, i found it difficult to understand a lot of the speakers on subjects which is already difficult to comprehend...was anyone else stuck by the fact that so many of these experts seem to have some neurologic issues?? is that a function of age??

The Toroidal universe model is so similar to the understanding of our ancient ancestors who somehow were able to imagine the snake ( the universe ) eating its own tail. I am at awe 🫢 of how our ancient ancestors had had the understanding of that possibly very true nature of our universe.

why does speed of light / causation not experience time?

The challenge of dealing with time is to recognize there is a fundamental distinction between a materialistic/nominalistic worldview with which one can associate the function of the left cerebral hemisphere and is a form of time which is synchronic and 'chronotic' and, effectively, spatialized, as Henri Bergson would argue, versus a form of time that is fundamentally relational, intersubjective, qualitative, diachronic and 'kairotic' and is associated with the function of the 'relationally-oriented' right cerebral hemisphere. The former 'chronotic' time is 'the time of the physicist' is quantitative and numerical involving the counting of oscillations of a physical system that is a stable oscillator--it exists but it is linear, and it is NOT continuous NOR is it real. The latter form of 'kairotic' time, associated with Bergson's 'La Durée', however, is relational, intersubjective, and it IS continuous, circular, AND it IS real.

objective time of universe from dark energy expansion of space? based on electromagnetic field?

extra dimensions of time on quantum scale?

I greatly enjoyed these talks. I would like to bring to attention of the audience that the connection between consciousness, physics, and higher dimensions was discussed long ago in my paper "On the Quantization of Gravity by Embedding Space-time in a Higher Dimensional Space", Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2 (1985) 869. Among other, in that paper it stays: "In a normal, awake, state an observer is continuously measuring (at least with his sense organs) the proper time; he has no idea of ’other worlds’. Besides this situation, our theory also predicts a situation in which an observer does not measure the proper time, and as a compensation he can then have some knowledge about the distribution of matter through the higher space, i.e. he can experience in some way the existence of alternative worlds. Has this last prediction any relation to reality? My conjecture is that it has. Remember that an observer is not always in an awake state of consciousness. He can be under the influence of hypnosis, drugs, etc, or he can simply sleep and dream. When in such a state of consciousness, he is no longer precisely ‘measuring’ the proper time; he is not aware of the usual three-dimensional space or world, but nevertheless he is aware of something: he experiences various hallucinations, dreams, etc. Is this related to some certain extent with the existence of higher dimensional space and alternative worlds?" At that time, mentioning consciousness in a physics paper published in a physics journal was not very common. The concept of a three dimensional "now", perceived by consciousness, moving in a higher dimensional space (for example, one with three time dimensions), has been explored in several of my other publications. How Einstein's "block universe" can be superseded by introducing, besides the special relativity time coordinate, t, an additional time, referred to as "evolution time" or tau, has been considered by some physicists following Stueckelberg's initial proposal. In such theories, the wave function depends on tau and four spacetime coordinates and can be localized in spacetime, meaning it is localized not only in space but also in the time coordinate t. The region of such localization moves forward along t as tau increases. In my paper "On the interpretation of the relativistic quantum mechanics with invariant evolution parameter", Foundations of Physics 21 (1991) 1005, I argued that the localization of wave function in time implies that the observer is sharply aware only of a brief time interval around the "now", and that the tau is the time perceived by consciousness. This concept corresponds to "specious present" as considered by Bernard. In the works, superficially discussed in this brief comment, one can find how some of the concepts presented in the fascinating talks on this KZread channel can be formalized within the framework of higher dimensional theories and parametrized relativistic quantum mechanics.

@blijebij

2 ай бұрын

* Is this related to some certain extent with the existence of higher dimensional space and alternative worlds?"* Personally I do not think so, Consciousness has always an experience intrinsic quality in it (see hypnosis or dreaming, where association is central, or lucid dream research from Stephen Laberge). Your interest in self reference is one i also share. Awareness is in my view a holographic, information&relation system with self reference.

I found a mechanical definition of time. If we have a universe of radiation alone, it is not possible to define either time or space. But the moment radiation self-traps to form mass by going in closed loops, time is formed. It is the number of rounds radiation makes as it goes round. This is a number and goes in one direction exactly like time. If there is more than one mass created in this way, space is defined by sending light to go an reflect back while counting time. The distance is derived from d=c . f. So, both time and distance are created when matter is created. This is also the way the SI standard of units defines the second and meter, by the frequency of rotation/oscillation and the meter by the number of wavelengths.

Not far from Cincinnati Ohio there is a somewhat smaller scale reproduction of the Eiffel Tower in an amusement park called King's Island. From the top of the tower one can see the entire park all at once- rollercoasters, games, food, water rides, and water park, you name it. But as you can imagine, experiencing the park in this manner is very different than actually riding the rides. When a soul descends the Eiffel Tower of the block universe and starts riding the rollercoasters, it experiences time and everything else entirely differently.

might quantum probability virtual particles be generated by inflation or sometimes like it?

The wave function of the universe has time trapped inside it as the wave nature means a time between crests. Not stubbornly consistent illusion but a prime factor of space/time.

Nathan Seiberg is absolutely correct when he says: "I am almost certain that space and time are illusions. These are primitive notions that will be replaced by something more sophisticated"... the more sophisticated notion he is wanting to make space for is none other than spacetime....

There’s not just a theory of everything. There is a theory above everything.

subjective time from consciousness? human brain connects with infinite(simal)?

I am understanding most of it, I learn new languages quickly and the s parallel conversations and applications. I would like to acknowledge being permitted into this conversation is flattering. Because of the content here it’s clear the algorithms permit a limited number of viewers. I am going to sit quietly mostly and review it more than once until I can speak the language. I would like to challenge one aspect….. But first I don’t know the context. Is the goal to know the truth or to engineer guardrails? The future is not set, but neither is the past once a wave has collapsed. I believe it’s possible to send data backwards in order to obtain technology earlier than we experienced it on our linear timeline. The problem here is if we were capable of sending technical data backwards would physicists know what to do with this data? Blueprints, data, media, it’s possible for consciousness to travel backwards. I know there is no way for me to prove it other than describing a process I witnessed and it still works today. I entered the consciousness of an Egyptian Priest as he was setting blocks to build a pyramid using what’s now called acoustic levitation. I had full understanding of what the process was as the priest was doing it as if I were him, and I know that’s how Nikola Tesla designed Wardenclyfe but using more modern materials than the Egyptians. I don’t care prove it, I know what happened. The point is if a spirit or energy from today can travel back in time than data can also be sent back. If this data were the technical data for inventions that weren’t mean to exist until later but materials to build it before it’s originally scheduled time than we could expedite the timeline for technology.

Interesting, how the same people who want to deny or reduce the wave function also want to deny extension across time, to take us back to classical Newtonian picture.

The animation at the beginning 0:30 is inaccurate. The spin emerges from the transition through time.

It would be good to have the great spiritual orator Swami Sarvapriyananda at a conference like this . His knowledge of Advaita Vedanta ( plus his knowledge of physics and consciousness) would add a lot to this discussion. It may also help introduce Advaita Vedanta to scientists who aren't yet aware of it . Many scientists already are , Schrödinger certainly was and very impressed by it . E=🕉️

quantum probability from virtual particles in future?

Since time is used to describe change, does time have discrete (universe-spanning, hence fractional) intervals, or is time simply extra-dimensional order-in-complexity, energy being any change in that? Expansion, or changes in volume of time, create mass (alt t) in black holes, so time seems to ping the distant future there, as much as the past. But how do super-fluid trans-locations of time (dark matter flux) encompass a gravitic space?. in other words, when E=mc2, we can replace E with 'change in extra-dimensional complexity' = (alt t) x c 2 (volume of time), no?.

@digbysirchickentf2315

3 ай бұрын

Time is only a notion, it has no physicality.

@Stacee-jx1yz

3 ай бұрын

The polar opposite of black holes (cosmological) are monads (quantum): [Monad in philosophy/cosmogony]: Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the sum "I am" of all things. The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both. The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.* It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people. [In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]: 1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force. 2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together. 3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions. 4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter. 5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz. 6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics. 7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions. [Monad in mathematics, science and technology]: Monad (biology), a historical term for a simple unicellular organism Monad (category theory), a construction in category theory Monad (functional programming), functional programming constructs that capture various notions of computation Monad (homological algebra), a 3-term complex Monad (nonstandard analysis), the set of points infinitesimally close to a given point

Experience is all and time is a feature of experience

I hope at some point Bernardo explains what Lee Smolin was saying as, in the view of this amateur (in the Latin sense of the word), it seems extremely consequential, especially considering the source.

📍1:59:08 2:01:18

Relaytivity: It seems to me that two things far apart do not exist in the same reality. In order to be in the same reality, you need to establish a physical connection between the two. But to do that you need Communicate I.E. something must travel from one to the other-and that takes…TIME. The farther away from each other the more time it takes and the greater the separation from each other’s (instantaneous) reality. An independent observer is even worse, because he/she must connect with both at the same time.

Agree not a single wave function for the universe but they do merge in time. As in the beginning will be its end.

The relationship between mind and time is simple. Time is a measurement of difference. That’s why time is set by an atomic clock and we have time zones for light but not other things. Time itself is just the measurement of the differences between each other. The mind is grown differences through experiences and such. The mind grows its folds in relation to the differences absorbed by our sensors. Those folds are the neurons and the differences grown into our body/difference. These folds influence the body and the body manipulated reality to find things within the connections of differences. So time and mind are similar because the differences and connections that build both of them.

@Ryan-eu3kp

3 ай бұрын

That was a good read, thanks.

@FrancisGo.

3 ай бұрын

If an observer were to approach a null geodesic by accelerating close to the speed of light, they and their clock would perceive less time passing than a standard, earth bound dudebro. So time is not absolute. The absolute substance is by definition the only substance from which all things are derived. So time must not be a fault in the stars, for entropy is in the eye of the beholder. 😂 Kenosis. 😮

The intro where he says time is an emergent property and then says the small doesnt have time is wrong but close. Time is an emergent property of difference, its a measurement of the difference between differences. between 1 and 8 there are several differences and math equations that expose the differences just like our differences expose realities differences.

conscious experience, abstract thought, emotional free will, physical choice

mind is definitely composed of the multiple streams of Consciousness we are just tuned into one frequency right now.

the classic universe backs into a quantum future as the present?

How would you describe a wave if there is no time? Especially if the wave is a piece of music.

@michaelodriscoll

3 ай бұрын

An expression of the change within an vibrational resonance. A musical note perhaps. Namaste 🙏

@kpunkt.klaviermusik

3 ай бұрын

My question was not meant in a philosophical sense. A note has a frequency and a duration. Supposed there is no time - how would one define tone height or rhythm...?

@blijebij

3 ай бұрын

You still could define them, you would get a kind of hologram where all the freq and vibration is put in.

@3:04:07I believe it is a conflicting notion to state that; having a meter to gauge these aspects would enable a skeptic to embrace open-mindedness... With all due respect.

Very hard to hear Lee

The ads are very irritating

Just change the word time to change and movement that’s what time is. From the smallest movement to the largest. It’s not hard life if you don’t let the ego blur your vision.

What exists already exists so you can take it for granted that there's enough stuff to create what we have. Otherwise it wouldn't be here so you take that energy or whatever that source material as a given because it is here. You don't think of it as having the beginning or when did the loop of constantly growing strange looping infinites

I am still learning your nomenclature, but if there is to be an extension of sciences to include scientific explanations of spirituality and consciousness then it should be named Cereology and a resurrection of this become receipts already exist. Believe I know the underlying discussion is a parallel to block chain.

As written in the Book of Time, time existed prior to nothing so the length of nothing could be measured. Then time transitioned nothing into something. Time is fixed with a beginning and an end. Energy moves throughout time leaving a ghost signature at that point in time where you can return back to that point and witness the energy signature. Time being fixed means energy also has a signature at each future point in time. In the end, time will again transition something into nothing and then measure the length of nothing. Time is the beginning and the end.

Starts at 4:20 😛

"Time & Mind: Was Einstein Wrong About Time?" should be: It's About Time that Einstein was Wrong

we see things spaced away by seeing them backwards in time ?

Lee is hard to understand, can you use sub-titles for his presentation?

@CosmosMarinerDU

3 ай бұрын

The KZread closed captions are pretty good

mind could be in extra smaller dimensions of time and space? maybe like black hole?

Most scientists have many theoretical propositions. Some of us have only two. Consciousness is fundamental. Evolution us true.

Regarding Paranormal experience, the abstract void of Spacetime has messed up our thinking, a Medium or Substrate for the different vibrations that we see - light, matter, radiation, electricity, EM fields, gravity, Mind, Space (vacuum energy) - answers what and how we experience the Paranormal, as well as Memory and consciousness. Mind or big C (consciousness) as the Buddhists say is Space, and Space is Information. There is no Self, no observer, in isolation, Relationship and Process are the Functions of a Resonant Medium defined by a Harmonic Structure. "The Universe is a Wave, which manifests Harmonics, and each of these Harmonics manifest their own Harmonics." Ray Tomes.

Life and Consciousness is Eternal, Stuff-side of Life, is a Motion-Ocean, time is the 'shadow' of Motion. Time do Only exist in the Mind of Living Beings, Life-side. Change become Motion, Motion become Time, and Time become Time-Spaces, memoires in our Consciousness.

If we take it as clone cannot have our experience then all the space which has energy sorry let me reformulate it since space has past it must also have memory......but i am not an expert what do u think....although it might not have the same kind as of us human

Maybe the university came into existence by disassociation, maybe the big bang was the disassociation from the meta physics to the physical

inflation from quantum gravity?

📍2:12:11

Talking window might b something like c++ n other windows b like machine language

Hello from Kazakhstan. The result is a “theory of everything” in a simple device. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, a car - using the Michelson experiment of 1881/2024, and only then the experiment would be 100% completed. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on a 100% completed Michelson experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum.

"The world looks significantly different depending on which time projection it is viewed in." (Naan). Of the three: Schwarzschild, proper and global, it seems that the third time should be chosen, since the asymmetry of time actually implies the accumulation of time, more precisely, history. In other words, it is the age of the system that is the determining factor for describing the physical processes occurring in the system under consideration. We can say that there is neither the present or the future, but only the evolving past.* P.S. “The direction of the process is always the loss of energy availability.”, Feynman. Thus, it is impossible to measure time even mentally experiment (without the use of clocks, instruments, phenomena ...) without energy consumption. --------------------------- *) - Ancient Roman quantum mechanics: to the question: how many eggs can you eat on an empty stomach? There was only one correct answer: one!; the inscription on the ancient Roman clock: more than you think.

@vanikaghajanyan7760

2 ай бұрын

The asymmetry of time actually implies the accumulation of time, more precisely, history, variety. Apparently, the researcher can detect and measure the effect of the aging process in his own frame of reference caused by the phenomenon of global time t(universe)=1/H: ds^2=c^2dт^2=g(00)c^2dt^2=(1-Ht*)c^2dt^2, where the Ht* parameter shows which part of the global the time "elapsed" in its own frame of reference, t* is the measurement time according to the clock of the resting observer, t is the duration of any physical process in its own frame of reference. That is, an observer can measure the increase in the duration of processes in the laboratory frame of reference: dт=[√ g(00)]dt=[√(1-Ht*)]dt~(1-Ht*)dt

Life is a gift, a present that's why they say "there's no time like....... the present". Even the tree in the forest becomes nutrients for new plants when time is up. Time is the space between big bang theories and humans devise methods of using the threat of future doom and gloom scenario through mind kontrol institutions promising spiritual relief if adhered to but time is an abstract of what we learned from the past and plot out in the present what we hope the future will produce. It's as instinctive as animals that hoard food for the coming winter. Time is the seasons, life itself. Enjoy your present. Agape salute! Ciao!

Interestingly, no one who thinks time is unreal is able to make a description or even a single statement without invoking it. Made that is evidence enough it is real and even fundamental

Space and time are man made definitions. Even though an objects' dimensions can change with time there is no such thing as space- time which is more confabulation than science. Just change definitions to make descriptive equations work? Hell no. Gravity warps space-time? Hell no.

We have Wittgenstein, but everyone here is ignoring him, playing word games with terms like "Illusion" , "reality", "existence" etc.

The guy saying that the universe will never be infinite is wrong because potential Infiniti is just as valid as infinite Infinity because something that is always expanding that has nothing to stop it as Newton's law says that something in motion tends the same thing goes for expansion growth and multiplying deciding and condensing.