Use this link playen.link/simplehistory_ to get Enlisted for FREE, 3 days of premium time and several orders for troops and weapons. My username is 'dansimplehistory'

@Simplehistory

10 ай бұрын

@LavaCreeperPeople

10 ай бұрын

The WORST gun Magazine Position in WW2

@SeraSera08

10 ай бұрын

​@@LavaCreeperPeoplelol?

@BLC888

10 ай бұрын

Please stop the live action adds. It is so awfull

@Iraqi_TopG

10 ай бұрын

@@BLC888nah

In the case of the P90's top mounted mags, they completely voided the aiming issue by overengineering how the mags work. The mag is parallel to the length of the gun. The reciever rotates the cartriges as they enter the reciever. Watch videos on how the P90 works. It's total genius!

@MandalorV7

10 ай бұрын

I got the chance to handle one at a gun range in Las Vegas. A real treat to shoot. Personally had some issues getting a sight picture. But that was partly because I’m right handed and left eye dominant. Another advantage for the system is that the casings eject down. So less of a chance of those things hitting the guy next to you. I think there has been a hybrid between a P90 and AR-15 built. So that could also be another modern top fed machine gun.

@ToddAdams1234

10 ай бұрын

The biggest problem with a P90 (in my eyes) is the (currently) lack of being able to use a more powerful round suck as a 7.62x51. But I also understand that it’s also a bullpup design and that there’s no need (typically) for such a cartridge, which is also commonly a much longer range cartridge than what is currently common in today’s conflicts. A 5.56 (.223) is much closer to fitting in with the design necessities of how a P90 operates than a 7.62 does. I still wonder just how well a P90 would operate with a 5.56 cartridge because it does have a slight taper to the body, more than the 5.7x28 does. 🧐

@IowaClassBB

10 ай бұрын

@@ToddAdams1234 the P90 is an smg, 5.56 or 7.62 are usually used for rifles. SMG's are meant for close range so its not uncommon for them to use pistol caliber rounds, take the MP5 for example, its chambered in 9x19.

@stepanhejda8821

10 ай бұрын

​@@ToddAdams1234 The P90 was designed to be an SMG capable of piercing soft body armour. It was meant to replace the mp5 which struggled against modern body armour.🤓👍

@stepanhejda8821

10 ай бұрын

​@@MandalorV7The hybrid is called ar-57 but i dont think its used by any military.

The thing that kept the Australian Owen gun in service through the Vietnam War was it never jammed due to dirt blockages. The top-loading design meant any debris would fall out, something that was vitally important in the muddy conditions of the Vietnamese jungles.

@doomsdaytaco3819

9 ай бұрын

it was also rather cheap to make compared the the L1A1 SLRs at the time

@alface935

9 ай бұрын

​@@doomsdaytaco3819True

@baraka629

9 ай бұрын

It's unfortunate that the designer of that gun, an Aussie dude named Owen, didn't have much luck further in life and ended pretty poorly.

The only magazine that does its job best is the P90. Not only its centered ontop but its fairly transparent, so you can see the ammo count in your 50-round magazines.

@YoPhocFays

10 ай бұрын

Love the p90

@TheHammerGuy94

10 ай бұрын

Hello over engineered magazine feed!!!

@RVered

10 ай бұрын

It's so good it hasn't been used on any other model... The P90 magazine is reliable, but otherwise, there are issues. It's expensive, bulky, requires a unique scope mount, and is much clumsier to reload than video games would make you think. Also, the ability to see your ammo is partially obscured by the scope mount and is very common in other magazine designs nowadays.

@azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401

10 ай бұрын

The modern SMG era

@user-cv8xu2yk7m

10 ай бұрын

Ah yes, destroying WWII Germans with a P90

You forgot something really important with top-fed magazines. The Bren gun had two men assigned to it: the number 1 who shot it, and the number 2 who reloaded it, as well as carried spare barrels and tools to fix it. Top-fed magazines are much easier for the assistant gunner to change out since it’s not obstructed by the gunners arms. This is true for both stationary and mobile shooting positions, which is what the design heavily lends itself to. In a pinch it is also possible to reload without an assistant on the move with one hand with the proper use of a sling. Any perceived disadvantage can be overcome with the right military doctrine.

@Simplehistory

10 ай бұрын

very good point👍

@samuel10125

10 ай бұрын

​@Simplehistory I would also look at some of heroic feats carried by British and commonwealth troops single Handley running down enemy positions with Bren guns its crazy.

@cm374787

10 ай бұрын

And, though this isn't well known, the Bren accepted pan mags as well to give it an effective and reliable (for the time at least) 100+ round capacity. Intended for useage on aircraft, it did occasionally find utility in AA roles and even at infantry level though this is rare as the sight issue worsens by the magazine blocking them entirely. Regardless, it did still happen and photographs can be found of troops with it. As you've already pointed out though, it's always worth considering the obvious and not so obvious issues in design but the rarely asked question is what did troops actually do about these issues? Too many interesting and often cool (to us history nerds) things to list.

@theblondesiouxsiesioux

10 ай бұрын

As a shooter I'm fairly partial to side and top mounted mags, makes prone shooting easier (in my opinion). The biggest problem with a decent amount of top mounted mags is the side mounted sights, but that's not really a super big deal t.b.h.

@joaoie

9 ай бұрын

I found it perplexing that the loader was mentioned, but for side instead of top mount.

“I was saving the planet from an Axis of Darkness, while you were back home opening National Parks! Yes!” Winston Churchill

@jamsya493

10 ай бұрын

"Bully! A challenge! I love competition, now where would i mount the stuffed head of a Winston (ah!)" -Theodore Roosevelt, 1944

@TheHammerGuy94

10 ай бұрын

EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORYYYY!!!

@sydliriousgaming769

10 ай бұрын

Epic ..... Epic Rap Battle of History! Winston Churchill... V.S .... Theodore Roosevelt... BEGIN!

@Aiden_Muslim

10 ай бұрын

Winston Churchill also made mass genocide in Sub-India continent over 50 million deaths and said they are sub-humans.

@jamsya493

10 ай бұрын

@@Aiden_Muslim you must be fun at parties

7:31 “Remember, switching to your pistol is always faster than reloading” - Gaz

@laccless

10 ай бұрын

they ain’t have those bruh

@b3n583

10 ай бұрын

@@lacclessSecondary sidearms existed ever since man got the rifle

@laccless

10 ай бұрын

@@extantfellow46 how u gon switch to a sidearm when u don’t have one

@laccless

10 ай бұрын

@@extantfellow46 i know, but i’m not talking about that.

@laccless

10 ай бұрын

@@extantfellow46 u can’t switch to a sidearm if you don’t have one

You forgot to mention the most important reason why so many light machine guns were fed from top mounted magazines: So the gunner can keep his aim while an assistant gunner reloads the gun for him. Lewis, DP-27/DPM, Type 96/Type 99 and Bren gun being prime examples. But there were even variants of belt fed machine guns getting top feed drums (MG-15 and MG-34 double drum for Aircraft and Anti Aircraft mounts for example) for faster reloading when every second counts. Edit: Just added a few more examples to diversify.

7:14 I love how the one guy that ran into the MG line of fire didn't die

@MarkoXPlays

10 ай бұрын

Oh I see bruh why didn't he die 😂

@bobthebuilder1360

10 ай бұрын

He’s the main character

@banookbread

3 ай бұрын

​@@bobthebuilder1360he's the call of duty side character

It's not just the P90 that's top-feeding, there's also the calico series of smgs, FN p50 & the AR conversions

@F4Insight-uq6nt

10 ай бұрын

Shame it's in a pointless , over rated caliber.

@shinyy8918

10 ай бұрын

@@F4Insight-uq6ntbasically just expensive 9mm

@CoralCopperHead

10 ай бұрын

@@shinyy8918 That can actually defeat soft armour.

@enderbirds3814

9 ай бұрын

@@CoralCopperHeadand has improved ballistics over average pistol cartridges

@longiusaescius2537

7 ай бұрын

Yeah

The G11 not only had caseless ammunition and some crazy mechanics to delay recoil (along with other stuff), it mounted three magazines on the front of the barrel, and the central one was in use.

Keep in mind, submachine guns and Light Machine Guns were relatively NEW weapons back then.

@Wolf-wc1js

10 ай бұрын

@@rottingravensblood9106standard MGs that were heavy and required crews of multiple men to man, not something that weighed 30 pounds or lighter could be carried by one man

@rosaria8384

10 ай бұрын

​@@rottingravensblood9106 that was the heavy machine gun. LMGs were still a concept, started with the Chauchat by the French, then Lewis Guns, though they were still using the stationary doctrine. Then the Germans tried to portable the MG08 to be the 08/15 then later the 08/18 and MG14/17 from their aircraft. LMGs are still heavy though to this day.

@trk1b28varianrhesa4

10 ай бұрын

​@@Wolf-wc1jsFrench army already use lmg in ww1

@idontcare-ct7jm

10 ай бұрын

There were almost no lmgs in WW2. Machine-guns, and Heavy machine guns. Not all Mgs are "light" like COD tells you.

@CPFMTKV

9 ай бұрын

@@rosaria8384 the madsen gun was the first lmg that existed as far back as 1902

fun fact about the MP18, teh reason it has a weird drum mag or snail mag is the request of field storm troopers who asked for the SMG to use the snail mags which were used with modified lugars, the mag was more than plentiful at the time. Though as for why there is quite a bit of side mag fire arms a little before WW2 is simply put the idea was that WW2 was gonna be another trench warfare or soldiers in constant prone positions.

Some SMGs were designed to be gripped by the mage, the MP-40 actually was supposed to be used by gripping the mag. Also some mags needed the user to hold the mag in the firearm especially after being worn out.

@lewismacleod543

10 ай бұрын

Almost correct you're supposed hold it by the magazine well with your thumb and top fingers on the well and bottom fingers resting on the magazine.

@nickgraff9413

10 ай бұрын

@@lewismacleod543 Actually, yes and no. The MP40 does have a handguard where you are supposed to hold it, it's right where the stock is folded against in the above image. Holding this weapon by the magazine housing can be done, and soldiers issued an MP40 were trained in how to do it properly. Under no circumstances is the magazine itself to be used as a handhold. Unlike other magazine designs which have a double-column staggered-feed, the MP40 has a double-column single-feed magazine. What this means is that hand pressure on the magazine body can cause the feed lips to move out of position, instigating a weapon malfunction.

I like how they tried literally every magazine angle in WW2 😂

@Sapphiregamer8605

10 ай бұрын

Even coming out of the stock?

@idontcare-ct7jm

10 ай бұрын

@@Sapphiregamer8605 There were commercial .22s that fed from tube mags in the stock lol

@mufflersponge8969

10 ай бұрын

There was also… ZK-383 - Magazine came from the upper left on a 45° angle MP35 - Magazine came from the right side

@FuzDoesStuff

10 ай бұрын

@@Sapphiregamer8605 Spencer carbine

@ryszakowy

9 ай бұрын

trial and error and nothing encourages testing like war

@4:10 bro got that stormtrooper sighting for his MP-40... 😂

The would-be victim of the Bren gun at 5:47 went from “Oh no! Don’t shoot me!” to “Uh, you need a hand there, bud?” when the user smacked his gun in frustration, lol!

7:34 mans really emoted before ending the fight

@SilliamWilliam-xb7sl

10 ай бұрын

The heil of shame before being sent back to lobby

The Sten was made at a time Britain was arming for "ambush" warfare, either defending an invasion or supplying French Resistance, for those it was great. The switch to the offensive highlighted its shortcomings

Just a small miss speak at 6:44, "1914" was said but it's "1941" for those just listening to the video.

@Coronet_shop

10 ай бұрын

6:44 1914 🤔

@sonbutters

10 ай бұрын

​@Coronet_shop yeah he says 1914

@Coronet_shop

10 ай бұрын

@@sonbutters yeah meant to type that on the main section #killerheat

@sonbutters

10 ай бұрын

@@Coronet_shop oh fair enough, my mistake!

as a royal canadian navy sailor who's trained on the C7A2, the bottom-fed magazine is sometimes used to rest the rifle on the ground when firing from prone. Takes strain off of your arms, but more importantly adds another point of contact to stabilize the gun and improve firing accuracy

I was an M-60 gunner. It’s the only machine gun I’ve fired. Having your ammunition hanging from the side on a belt presents some difficulties, but the nearly unlimited firepower gave me confidence.

@applepie1911e

10 ай бұрын

Was your m60 reliable?

@princessmarlena1359

10 ай бұрын

I’ve always wanted to use an electric mechanism driven Gatling Gun.

@gergokerekes4550

10 ай бұрын

and you can always easily check how much you have left. also, you can drape yourself with it, and that will never get uncool

@RandomManIncorperated

10 ай бұрын

Stallone Yelling Increases

@jonathanstuber0402

8 ай бұрын

​@@princessmarlena1359 like, on a mount or just firing from the hip, Fallout-style? Would love to shoot one mounted to a tripod or pintle mount myself, but firing one from the hip unaided would be very difficult and possibly even harmful for a human. The recoil from even a relatively light round like the 5.56 × 45mm NATO standard light assault rifle caliber would be very difficult to control at best, and tear your arm from its socket at worst, at the typical rate of fire of such weapons. You might be able to pull it off with one chambered in .22 lr though, or use a mechanical limiter of some kind to cut the rate of fire down significantly. Also, carrying enough ammo to make such a fast-firing weapon viable in a prolonged firefight would be pretty difficult as well.

The dp28 is an interesting machine gun, it has a top mounted magazine, but it doesn't ubstruck your vision, surprised it wasn't mentioned

@longiusaescius2537

7 ай бұрын

It's a lewis gun mag right?

@emberfist8347

7 ай бұрын

@@longiusaescius2537 No but they are a similar style. Record player shape and all but very complex and hard to load. The Soviets updated the DP after the war for this reason to accept belt feed.

Id imagine the worst placement would be in front of the barrel. "Every bullet you shoot, causes more bullets to fly at the enemy. Thats more bullet per bullet!"

@chucksneed1264

10 ай бұрын

That's roughly 65% more bullet per bullet

@FuzDoesStuff

10 ай бұрын

They fire the whole bullet for more bullet

@shanekhiu9884

10 ай бұрын

Metalstorm lol 😅

@ryszakowy

9 ай бұрын

that sounds like bethesda gun design...

@desolatedfalcon209

9 ай бұрын

Isn’t that just rifle grenades?

5:56 I like how he just sat there looking at him like "are you gonna shoot me or not".

00:00 Best magazine locations of World War II 01:37 underside magazine placement 04:54 top mounted magazine placement 06:26 side mounted magazine placement 08:27 Conclusion on magazine placement in World War II

@MemeDogger

10 ай бұрын

From what I'm understanding, this user is a bot, it legit just gives you free chapters for videos.. (is what is says in there bio)

@-www.chapters.video-

10 ай бұрын

Not a bot, tool uses AI, and it's freemium

“Oh s*** World War too soon? Well Teddy’s dropping bombs so you best go hide in your tube!” Theodore Roosevelt

@chrisidoo

10 ай бұрын

No.

7:29 Cold... LMAOOOOOO

Fun fact: One of the reason most primary infantry weapons featured internal magazines rather than detachable ones is the fear that infantrymen would lose or damage too many of the detachable ones. And they were correct. About 2/3 of the detachable magazines issues to troops were never returned to the armorer, or were returned in unusable condition. By the 1950s, however, detachable magazines were so cheap to manufacture that the cost of losing them was easily offset by their various merits.

The top mounted magazine on the Bren gun, I dont think I have ever read that the gun had "problems aiming", in fact pretty much everything I have read suggested the gun was extremely accurate, even with a side mounted sighting system to the point that it continued service as the L4 into the 90s in some units in the British Army. Heck I am sure I have seen some sources claiming it as too accurate even. edit: Also for side, the Sterling SMG was in use, again, into the 90s by several countries as a side mounted magainze machinegun.

@EmperorSigismund

9 ай бұрын

The Owen gun was also used into the Vietnam War and was even replaced by another top fed gun, the F1 which was only retired when the Austeyr replaced it in the 90's. I'm pretty sure the main reason top fed weapons went out of fashion was convention and compliance with standard rails and sights.

@emberfist8347

7 ай бұрын

@@EmperorSigismund That and people started to accept that southpaws existed. the issue with top-fed weapons is you need offset the sights to one side unless you over-engineer the thing like FN or Calico and that means it doesn't work well if the sights are offset to the left for southpaws. The Austeyr for example was issued with two bolts one for right-handed shooters, and a spare if the shooter was left-handed and the benefits of top feeding are nominal at best. The Bren is accurate sure until you put a lefty behind one and they have to aim the thing.

One advantage of top mounted magazines is the decreased likelihood of dirt and debris getting into the action and magazine. When the mag is facing down, dirt is not nearly as likely to work its way inside.

@emberfist8347

7 ай бұрын

The Type 11 says hello.

The big change for underside mounted mags came with the invention of double stack magazines

What was overlooked in this video was the primary reason for the development of the Owen gun - reliability. Especially in jungle warfare which taxes the reliability of machine guns, so the top mounted magazine was developed. It is not all just about the quality of the manufacturing, it is also about the abuse in the field, dirt, mud, rain, that the gun has to endure.

@edvoon

10 ай бұрын

Also because it's a submachine gun fighting in an environment where distances are extremely short, accuracy is less important than volume of fire. So the Owen has to use an offset sight because of the top mounted magazine, it's good enough for short distance aiming but in return they get a larger magazine capacity and a much more reliable weapon. You know a gun is good when the army has to prise it out of the hands of their soldiers when it came time for a replacement.

@mystikmind2005

10 ай бұрын

@@edvoon Also it is not just about the conditions.... it is the nature of your enemy. In that regard, the Owen gun would be less desirable against German forces who are known to prefer a bit of range in their combat and do not use F-ing stupid suicide charges.

BAR had 20 rounds for a reason. A .30 06 is not a light round and the box mag wasn't exactly streamlined.

@tomhenry897

10 ай бұрын

Anything bigger the magazine will be taller then the bipod Larger mags were developed for vehicle mounts

You guys have really upped your animation since the last time I checked in. As a gun enthusiast, I appreciated all the detailed representations of WW2 guns :)

1:59 bruh what is bro shooting at 😂

0:41 YOU ADDED THE PING YESS

The best position of magazines: In your gun. The worst position of magazines: Empty and at home.

1:34 it's not P-P-S-H. it's P-P-Sh. As in, one letter. Pe-pe-sha in slavspeak. The Ш letter.

Storm trooper:*laughs with unlimited ammo but have to wait to not over heat*

@Psilomuscimol

2 ай бұрын

I think they used power cells that need replaced. Of course we never see that, but I think I read it somewhere

@Psilomuscimol

2 ай бұрын

They last a long time though

Best way is p90 way as magazine is literally perfectly in line with gun. Only issue is that its complicated & limits caliber. if you look at p90 it have all mentioned good parts of any other system, so if it would not cost so much, and had a little more oomph, we would see full military adoption of that puny thing.

The StG44 had a magazine so long that it all but prevented prone fire unless you dug an 18” hole in the ground first.

Many anti tank rifles use Top loaded mags. Diagonal mags would have been an interesting concept as well, since you could use your sights and balancing by adding counterweight would be a non issue. Yeah the weight is a downer, but usually the most tiring thing isnt the weight, but the position you hold a weapon and it's center of gravity.

7:25. I'm dying 🤣 I've been watching your videos for years and I love when you throw little gags into your videos.

Ok hear me out A side mounted magazine that curves back into the gun at a similar angle to the chauchat. The low profile of the magazine means it is far less likely to get caught on doorways and such, and also won't be too much of an imbalance. And even if it is you can just add a small counterweight to the opposite side. All the upsides but almost none of the downsides

He forgot DP-28 and Lewis Gun!

The best is one you didn't consider- the magazine running along the length of the gun, like the aforementioned Belgian FN P90 (and derivatives such as the AR-57), the Russian PP-19 Bizon, and the North Korean Type 88- the Belgian FN P90 being the posterchild of this specific design. All of the advantages of the side-mounted magazines and the bottom-mounted magazines with none of the downsides.

So which direction are you fed in? The Pederson Device: yes

Instead of slanting the rifle or putting canted sights manufacturers decided every position possible for a magazine.

And also solution for side mounted magazines getting stuck on doors, hold the weapon sideways so the mag is facing downwards or upwards

Pre body armour getting flat on the ground was vital, hence side or top magazines, or top loading stripper clips.

4:01 hard fuddlore. You were intended on numerous submachine guns to grip the magazine, most times, this was the only way you could hold it. You can go ahead and look at war photos for yourself.

I’ve literally been using that exact sound byte of the M1 ping as my text tone for months 😂

My grandfather always had a Thompson machine gun and samurai sword standing in the corner of the room I slept in as a kid. It always fascinated me.

If only history was taught like this in school. Who wouldn't love it😢 Kudos to you for taking the effort for such a video ❤

@LavaCreeperPeople

10 ай бұрын

If only useful things were taught in school

@darthmetallord

10 ай бұрын

I was taught how to load a musket in school the only thing they didn't teach was the measurements of black powder

@rommelthebreton

10 ай бұрын

​@@darthmetallord Where was your school when I was still a kid, dammit

@darthmetallord

10 ай бұрын

@@rommelthebreton funny thing is didn't even graduate that long ago 2014 and it was Ashwaubenon Elementary School in Green Bay they do Civil War reenactment every year or at least they used to not sure anymore

@darthmetallord

10 ай бұрын

@@rommelthebreton I was in 5th grade they brought a real Cannon and everything one of the coolest moments of my life I was on the Confederate side

Ok, but what about diagonal magazines? They weren't mentioned anywhere in the video.

This video is full of inaccuracies and generalizations. For example, the main decision leading to the BAR having 20-rounds was realiability: making springs sturdy enough to reliably feed 30 rounds of 30-06 from the bottom was pretty much impossible in 1918, and still very challenging/expensive in the '40s.

@darnit1944

10 ай бұрын

Pretty much why the 30 round Bren gun is top mounted. Gravity will assist the loading.

@alessiodecarolis

10 ай бұрын

And from what I read, the BAR was intended as a sort of assault rifle in WWI, more than a LMG, the US army employed it as a stop gap, and having a lot of semi automatic rifles they could lay more suppressive fire also if it was less than Ideal.

@SilliamWilliam-xb7sl

10 ай бұрын

It was meant for trench raiding by a line of BAR gunners who would march or "walk fire" to supress enemy positions but i think the americans enter the europe war too late to test that capacity. But i've seen that maneuver in movies

The top mounted magazine of the Bren Gun was perfect. It held 30 rounds. was easy for the assistant gunner to change and despite the offset sights the Bren is extremely accurate. The Bren went into service well before WWII and after being converted from .303 to 7.62 NATO stayed in service until the very early 2000s I trained on it and have used them and will take one into a fight any day. Give me a half an hour to train my Number 2 and we are good to go. The side magazine on the Sten and others has one advantage, when you are firing over the top of something it allows you a very low profile. On all of the SMGs DO NOT hold the magazine. You hold the magazine housing. The magazine housing on the MP40 is shaped so it is a hand grip. Holding the magazine is a feed failure that has found a place to happen. Many problems are caused by untrained or poorly trained troops

This is a classic youtube title example. Videos titled "worst" get more views, while actual video opens as best positions

Therapist: M1 garand with a removable magazine isn't real, it can't hurt you The m1 garand with a detachable magazine:

Top loaded magazines also assist wrapon reliability, any debries that get into the magazine could be tipped out as the mag is moved into position, plus, any dirt that still remianed could fall straight through and out of the ejection port.

Not just the BAR, the M16 originally had a 20 round magazine so it wouldn't get in the way when shooting from the prone position. 30 round mags are way more common today but during the Vietnam war 20 round mags were standard.

a big issue that's brushed off with side magazines is how the center of gravity changes as you empty it.

The owens gun was the best Gravity fed assisted ammo You can hug the ground better A whole host of things you wouldnt know until you needed it

The side line sights on the bren doesn't hinder aiming and when in position you can turn the weapon on it's side while still on bi-pod in order to get lower, you're forgetting a verticale feed means the mechanism lifts the weapon instead of pushing it diagonally,

The elefant in the room is feeding type. Belt works best from side while drum magazin is almost unusable anywhere but from bottom - although there are exceptions like Lewis gun, but she has drum magazin lying flat on top and thus not obscuring aim. PS: and then there are older styles of magazins like nondetachable clip-fed magazin (located under gun but fed from up) or tube magazines (either under barrel or in stock).

Another detriment of side mounted magazines I read about is that there is no comfortable way to carry them in a sling. You will have either the magazine, the pistol grip, the charging handle or the sights digging into your back no matter what way you carry it.

Mag at the bottom has the problem of making reloding more difficult while you are on the ground.

God smiles on me, i was looking this up yesterday. Ty simple history Could you do a video on allied vs central power trenches in ww1 Been asking for a bit, hope one day you see it

There is another noticeable top feed modern production gun : CS/LS6 with a helical magazine, also some other experimental type with helical magazines as well

2:49 oh wow i didn’t picture you behind the voice I legit thought it was an old old man talking LOL 😂 I’m not putting you down by any means I in fact love your voice!!!

My favorite mag position is the one on the G11 rifle.

Biggest benefit of bottom mout to me is that no dirt will fall in an any dirt can fall out

that animation was hilarious imagine months of training you land in normandy you enter the building and hit the door frame with magazine of your sten gun making it fall out germans lose their collective crap while laughing at you as someone shots you 4 times in the chest

I would say the best magazine location is firmly seated into whatever weapon system you have. How it gets there is another story.

@ashsteele7361

9 ай бұрын

Also, why are soldiers called "American G.I.s"? When G.I. is short for "Government issue". American Government issues? Makes no damn sense.

@ashsteele7361

9 ай бұрын

Ah, I did a bit of research. G.I. originally meant galvanize iron. It later took on different meanings including "general issue". Or even "ground infantry" which to me is a redundant name. Because I guess there is air infantry and water infantry.

that thumbnail could be any weapon from COD Vanguard💀

Btw German soldiers did not hold thier mp40s by the magazines like on the animations, as it would mess with the feed of the weapon. They would hold the base of the magazine

An more important disadvantage with side mounted magazines. the inertie caused by de mass and feed off cartridges will give an POI shift to the right you have to compensate.easier

top fed (ZB26, Bren, type99) and side fed (MG42, M1919, sten, type100) are both utilized for MGs. MG shooters usually fire proned and mounted therefore these locations don't make collisions against the ground. For a stand firing weapon the usual (bottom) fed is the best choice. Also holding the magazine while firing is not a disadvantage but an advantage especially to short barreled weapons such as Tec9 or MP40. Their position determined that they can work as a good front grip for SMGs.

* *Points to the Cheuchat* * "And then there's THIS piece of Cheushit..."

Don't forget the AN-94 I think that has a canted mag insert that never took off

8:17 there is actually a South African anti materiel rifle called the ntw-20 that uses a side facing magazine

Call of Duty players adding a drum mag to the M1 Garand: Did I ever tell you what the definition of insanity is?

The BAR was generally teamed with a Thompson so that covering fire could be laid down during reloading

7:05 bro didn't even try aiming at them 💀💀

@banookbread

3 ай бұрын

Mostly they have their sights dead on the target both front and rear sights and still miss

the best magazine location that you can have is a full one just ready to go. FIGHT ME!

@dbach1025

10 ай бұрын

Come get some!!! Lol

What about the saddle magazine of the German Mg15. I know it's limited use in infantry, but I'm wondering if there were any advantages to that design, or if a regular belt feed was better. I know the saddle drum was designed for aircraft, so it made less mess inside the aircraft gunner position, but would a quick change saddle, be better without an assistant gunner?

@emberfist8347

7 ай бұрын

It was basically another top-feeder magazine and it didn't have any real advantages outside of aircraft. It had a high capacity, but it was also heavy, complex, a pain to load and unreliable. There is a reason they abandoned those magazines for the dedicated MGs like the MG 34 and MG 42. Those were just belt-fed weapons with the magazine being a hollow chunk of metal to hold the belt in place.

I was a lefty during a very brief stint in the Canadian Reserves. There were definitely "challenges" compared to my exclusivity righty section-mates. Fun times!

Ergonomically a side fed magazine like that on the German FG42, the US Johnson LMG or British Sten Gun was best. It allowed same sight picture as that of a bottom fed weapon while lowering the weapons profile in a prone position.

The top mag was especially good for a light machine gun where you might have an assistant loader it's easier for someone besides the shooter to load a top mag, but that would only apply for a lmg and isn't relevant on smg or mag fed assault rifle

The worse magazine position, in my opinion, would be one of those round mags on the top of the gun

What about behind the trigger tho? They have some good advantages like allowing the gun to be more compact, and with a longer barrel. Not only that, but it allows for better aiming while shooting since that the action is all happening in the rear, instead of the front.

@FuzDoesStuff

10 ай бұрын

You can also call it bullpup if you want

@jackaubrey8614

10 ай бұрын

Bullpups just aren't as ergonomic as forward-mag rifles and the idea of having the working parts behind the trigger means they (generally) can't be fired left-handed - unless you enjoy hot brass in the face? Might not seem like much but it's a serious tactical failing - instead of "leaning" around a (right-hand) corner you have to expose your whole body in the open. Good luck with that....

There is minor mistake, BREN is SMG created by Czechoslovakia, not by British. British just bought license to be able to produce it.

@crumpetcommandos779

10 ай бұрын

LMG not SMG and there are some differences, it's based off the czech design but its not just a carbon copy

@dragonlukasmapping805

10 ай бұрын

​@@crumpetcommandos779it should had been both mention. And should had been Czechoslovak flag with UK one.

Truly amazing channel and extremely underated

The top mounted magazine is easier is for another person to reload, which is kinda important in crew-served weapons.

7:28 did him dirty 💀

During WW2, grabbing sub machine guns by the magazine wasn’t causing the jams, it was a way soldiers combated the feed issues of magazines at the time.

Interesting video! Never gave this much thought

From what I have learned the Bren and it's Czech ancestors had only one vice; they were too accurate not allowing much in the way of suppression fire

Many times holding smgs by the magazine helped feeding, such as the soviet ppsh, due to poor magazine quality control, though holding by the mag or magwell was often the point that was supposed to be held, such as the mp40 which was designed to be held by the magwell, same as the sten gun