Life Inside a WW2 Panther Tank (Cross Section)
Thanks to World War Armies for sponsoring this video! Download now and get a free M26 Pershing tank: wwc.onelink.me/uDzy/simplehis...
Check out our other Channel: / @simplehistorylive
Become a Simple History member: kzread.info...
Support us on Patreon: / simplehistory
Discord server: / discord
Copyright: DO NOT translate and re-upload our content on KZread or other social media.
SIMPLE HISTORY MERCHANDISE
Get the Simple History books on Amazon:
www.amazon.com/Daniel-Turner-...
T-Shirts
teespring.com/stores/simple-h...
Simple history gives you the facts, simple!
See the book collection here:
Amazon USA
www.amazon.com/Daniel-Turner/e...
Amazon UK
www.amazon.co.uk/Daniel-Turner...
/ simple-history-5494376...
/ simplehistoryyt
Credit:
Show Created by Daniel Turner (B.A. (Hons) in History, University College London)
Script:
Narrator:
Chris Kane
vocalforge.com/
Пікірлер: 819
World War Armies is the first true RTS on mobile. Hurry up and get your M26 Pershing tank together with a starter token pack: wwc.onelink.me/uDzy/simplehistory
@JustaJackalope
10 ай бұрын
E
@tangyonions
10 ай бұрын
A
@tangyonions
10 ай бұрын
Sports
@williamtang4905
10 ай бұрын
Please make an alternate history version of simple history, kings and generals did it aswell
@sam8404
10 ай бұрын
it's in the game*
That infrared scope sounds absolutely insanely advanced for 1940s technology.
@christianmunsch5590
10 ай бұрын
also a night vision scope who was also invented by us back than.
@Gary_The_Metro
10 ай бұрын
Funnily enough it wasn't, the US and even the soviets had their own early variants of night vision by this time too.
@ardantop132na6
10 ай бұрын
@@Gary_The_Metroaka, the version that need the Moon to operate.
@Gary_The_Metro
10 ай бұрын
@@ardantop132na6 If you think the German's IR would be able to operate effectively without any additional light sources such as the moon or an IR searchlight then I have a bridge to sell you. The german NVG wasn't much more advanced than anything the US or soviets had. and even most night vision leading into the 70's still needed either an IR illuminator or additional light to be effective. Only the most modern night vision goggles give a clear picture without any IR illuminators or additional light sources such as the moon.
@flycatchful
10 ай бұрын
The FG 1250 or Fahr- und Zielgerät FG 1250 (driving and aiming device FG 1250) was a German active infrared night-vision device mounted on tanks and other armored vehicles. It was developed by Ing Gaertner of the German optics company Carl Zeiss AG beginning in 1941.
When German Tigers and Panthers are more endangered than actual tigers and panthers
@tyranozilla
10 ай бұрын
😂
@2ndcomingofFritz
10 ай бұрын
Always have been
@markcana2917
10 ай бұрын
😂
@TsumyTsuny
10 ай бұрын
This video dropped as soon as i got Panther G in Enlisted broooo
@destroyerarmor2846
10 ай бұрын
Yeah, Russia hunts these German cats
Being a German reminds me of being a chef. I don’t care how much it cost or how many times we remake it, it MUST be perfect even if we have to close the restaurant. WWII was like a reopening under new management.
@axiolot5857
10 ай бұрын
and in the end the chef made insane dishes...
@TheGamingSyndrom
10 ай бұрын
and in the end you got 1 perfect steak with microcarrots and pouched potatoes, for 2000 customers storming the door, who then go to the kebabplace across the street instead
@macobuzi
10 ай бұрын
@@TheGamingSyndrom If you can charge the dish 2000 times more than a normal dish, then it's fine. Take a look at what insane dishes rich people are ready to buy.
@Ccdddttt
10 ай бұрын
@@TheGamingSyndrom lol if I ever hear someone say lightly pouched potato they’re getting punched
@Zelurpio
10 ай бұрын
Ich kann nur zustimmen: Wenn ich etwas mache, das nicht funktioniert, ist es mir egal, ich sorge dafür, dass es funktioniert, auch wenn ich dafür andere Dinge opfern muss
The Panther, the PzKw V Ausf. G, was probably the best of the Panthers built by the end of the war. Where the PzKw V Ausf. F would have gone (with a special mantlet to allow it to mount the main gun*) is only speculation. The beauty of the sloped armor gave the equivalency of 140mm of steel armor protection (from the front only). I remember my first introduction was in the 1970's game of PanzerBlitz. Great video!!
@rafaa4988
10 ай бұрын
To be best of the worst tank of the war. What an honor xd.
@oberleutnanttai4343
10 ай бұрын
The panther F would never have been planned to use the 88. The panther f(Schmalturm), and panther 8.8 were separate projects. This also goes for the panther 2.
@tomawen5916
10 ай бұрын
@oberleutnanttai4343 i stand corrected and have edited as such. As I think about it the special mount in the design still only carried the 75mm KWK 70 main gun??
@tomawen5916
10 ай бұрын
@@rafaa4988 if i recall the highest rate of operational ability for the Ausf. G was 77% in the field. Compared to 32% when the Ausf. D was first introduced in 1943.
@jamesedwardladislazerrudo1378
10 ай бұрын
@@tomawen5916Imagine blaming a young Hitler youth for breaking transmission
Finally an animated video that demonstrates exactly how an adv works both technically and practically! I’ve been waiting a long time to view a video that shows how each member carried out his job. Please do more of these videos on as many AFV’s as possible especially SPA, SPAA, SPRL’s, and APC’s etc. Would love to see a cross section of a sturmtiger, JSU-152, and much more. Danke!
You should do a video on the stug similar to this video. Much like how the panzer IV is described as being the workhorse of the German military, the stug was probably the most mass-produced and well utilised of all German assault guns and tank destroyers of the war. With the vehicle even seeing action employed by the finish and a few other nations during the conflict
By all accounts, a very comfortable tank to operate for the time, which can't be underestimated
@Kriegloaf
10 ай бұрын
Very comfortable indeed, it halts itself during combat for you to chill out beside the road, and keeps you warm during winters with engine fires
@meyr1992
10 ай бұрын
yes lets spend more money on it and make it more complex for crew comfort. logistics? whats that?
@sirbachelorboredmen1314
10 ай бұрын
It's comfortable when it's not breaking down every minute
@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi
10 ай бұрын
@@sirbachelorboredmen1314 Why would it? The only issues were with early variants as it was still a prototype sent to the frontline
@Wubbeyman
10 ай бұрын
@@meyr1992hey crew comfort is not to be underestimated. Ergonomics are important and played a big factor into the design of the Sherman for instance. It was as tall as it was in part to accommodate the larger American men and to provide more space inside. The 76 mm was also not installed right away because it would have been too awkward and uncomfortable to work around.
Life inside Panther sounds like a vibe until you have to go in the middle of warzone
@miniatureben3558
10 ай бұрын
I see you everywhere
@Jack69_420
10 ай бұрын
@@miniatureben3558bot lol
@henrikhilskov
4 ай бұрын
And the light is nort working. In the book "Panzer in the mud" they used petroleum lights so everything was covered in sod :-D
It was more around 135mm effective on the upper glacis, because of the 55 degree slope! Hope that helps!
@starwarzfan4993
10 ай бұрын
Also it's original top speed was 55, but it had a governor installed, limiting the top speed to 48 in 1943!
This is definitely my favorite tank in the German army during WW2. I even remember that If I use the German army in Company of heroes, I always use Panther instead of Panzer and tiger😂
@IdiotIdiot69
10 ай бұрын
Its a game so it dosent suck balls and suffer lack of fuel.
@vernerreinumae
9 ай бұрын
Panthers and Pershing are my favorite WW2 tanks they just look beautiful.
@raval87
8 ай бұрын
but did you know that Panther and Tiger are also called Panzer? Panzer V Panther and Panzer VI Tiger, or to be more specific PzKpfw.
@raval87
8 ай бұрын
@@VIPER5529 the world is full of people for whom there is a division into "Panzer" tanks, i.e. PzKpfw I, II, III and IV, and the so-called "cats", i.e. Panther, Tiger, Tiger II... I always prefer to keep this information straight.
@zulu0489
7 ай бұрын
I don't want to crush your world, but the Panther was most likely the worst German tank in WWII
Angled armour was nothing new during WW2. The principle of sloping embattlements was put into practice in European fortresses that kept developing after the introduction of siege cannon. During the American Civil War, the CSS Virginia, the first ironclad ship, had sloping armour. The opposing USS Monitor had no sloping armour but its main turret was rounded, which also helped and its main hull was so low and close the water that it was impossible to target.
@vynicle2284
10 ай бұрын
why make the Chieftain, Centurion, M60, M48, the IS-Series, T-55, T-62 and T-64 if sloped armor is useless?
@bobsjepanzerkampfwagen4150
10 ай бұрын
@@vynicle2284i think he meant to say “nothing new”
@macobuzi
10 ай бұрын
Slight-slopped armor is good. But over slopping can create many disadvantages. I think the slopping angle of Panther and Tiger 2 is perfect, T34's is a little bit too much.
@AudieHolland
10 ай бұрын
@@macobuzi It's rather unfortunate you made same spelling mistake three times in a row. A bit sloppy.
@AudieHolland
10 ай бұрын
@@bobsjepanzerkampfwagen4150 Thanks
We love the Panther tank!!
@donbrashsux
10 ай бұрын
Love the cross section
@jamesedwardladislazerrudo1378
10 ай бұрын
Just your opinion lol
Could we get a cross section of the Char 2C? I know there was little of them made but it's still a legendary tank as it is the first ever operational super heavy tank
And even when that engine broke down, you'd have a pillbox with amazing range. That L70 could reach out and touch someone.
@CASA-dy4vs
10 ай бұрын
🤨
@Norwagen
10 ай бұрын
Worst thing about the panther probably isn’t the engine, it’s just that the commander and gunner can’t see anything
@macobuzi
10 ай бұрын
@@Norwagen Why? The Panther had a commander copula with a clear view and a high-profile turret, how could the commander not see anything?
@ArcticWolf00Alpha0
10 ай бұрын
@macobuzi Im not sure what he means about the commanders Copula, but I know that the Panther Gunner only has one single periscope and no other point of view, so his vision is extremely narrow.
@dronn_
10 ай бұрын
@@NorwagenThis problem only exist on Ausf. D, the Ausf. A installed the cupola to eleminate this problem but it's too tall so the G version is using the shortened version of the Tiger E serienturm cupola.
Tanks with cut-out sides are often vulnerable on the battlefield.
@gutholz4443
10 ай бұрын
no, it allows the enemy shell to pass harmlessly through
@EnemyAtom65
10 ай бұрын
Eliminate all shrapnel
@billyyank2198
10 ай бұрын
@@gutholz4443 I never thought about it that way!
@Vmaxfodder
8 ай бұрын
Enemies are always wise to this ,and never take advantage of such egregious flaws when their Enemies are not able to afford to build the rest of their armored tanks ! An enemy that is brave enough to go do battle with an unfinished Tank is too brave to stand against! Just lay down and admit defeat!
2:00 The Panther Ausf F was in production at the end of the war, one even saw combat fitted with an Ausf G turret. The Panther II was conceived during the design and early production of the Ausf D and was cancelled in 1944 as re-tooling all of the factories to produce it was not worth the effort. Elements of its design were incorporated into the Ausf G such as the "de-wedged" side armour. 5:25 It was not inspired by the T-34, sloped armour goes all the way back to the medieval times as it was used on helmets and breastplates etc to deflect blows. The T-34 merely showed that a sloped front glacis was worth the loss of internal space. 6:10 You have confused the Panniers with the side skirts. The panniers were indeed thicker on the Ausf G however you are describing and showing the 5mm thick side skirts that were present on all Panthers to stop the Soviet 14.5mm AT rifles from penetrating the lower side armour. Incidentally it was these side skirts that effectively killed off the Panther II project when they were introduced in April 1943. 7:22 It was connected to the gun via a metal bar, rather crude but it did the job. 7:36 The number of Panthers fitted with night vision was very limited and there are no real credible examples of it being used in combat. 7:40 It was not. This was mainly an order for the Panther Ausf F, it was designed to be IR night vision ready from the factory but for multiple reasons night vision equipment on Panthers never became standard issue, its performance was so poor that it was more of a gimmick than anything useable in combat.
@user-cq2om1io4d
10 ай бұрын
من هو صدام حسين ؟ Who is Saddam Hussein ?
@henrikhilskov
4 ай бұрын
@@user-cq2om1io4d ask your mother! :-D
@Salty-Unggoy
2 ай бұрын
Ya got sources my dude?
@STHV_
2 ай бұрын
@@Salty-Unggoy Yes! If it didn't need correcting I wouldn't have commented. Unfortunately this is another channel that just does a 5min Google search for all their info without actually verifying anything properly. The main ones are the Panzer Tracts books by Hilary Doyle, editions 5-1 to 5-4. You can also check Panther and it's Variants by Walter J Speiberger although you will need to make sure you are reading a post 1993 edition as the early ones have some errors surrounding the Panther II caused by a misdated document which messed up its entire history.
I love these series ! Keep them up !
You have to admit, German tanks are not only visually stunning but effective. It's scary to think what they could have built if granted time and logistics
@jackeman7514
10 ай бұрын
Not really, the panther’s engine and transmission were probably the worst of the war causing the crews to cannibalize other panthers to stay moving. To fix that extensive modernization would have to be done.
@MeiPaul-pc4gu
10 ай бұрын
@@jackeman7514kf51 panther:allow me to introduce myself
@Dreachon
9 ай бұрын
@@jackeman7514 Such a claim is nowhere near reality but then today's pop-history nonsense makes it a point to bash on anything German as much as possible
@thomasjones8588
9 ай бұрын
True, the Germans were great at engineering, but fortunately for us, not very good at winning wars.
@NeputuniaNepp
9 ай бұрын
If they were given the time or logistics in WW2, by august of 1945, all the Citizens of Berlin would be cooked to well done.
Thank you for your absolutely clear and extremely informative exposition.
One of my favorite tanks
I just saw the only working panzer tank in north America in Massachusetts. It's awesome
A tank commander from Nordland division told they get some of the Panthers with nightvision early 45 but found them without any value and removed them. I don't think it is correct that that the gunner was without infrared sight however he was dependent of halftracks equiped with a much bigger infrared light for aiming. The commander only have the small one to ensure that he was able to command the tank even the bigger spotligth on the halftracks wasn't pointing in his direction of view to command the tank. So when engaging an enemy he need radio communication with the crew on the halftrack to get to point their device on the target he wanted his gunner to combat.
'Tigers in the mud" has some good descriptions of life within a panzer on the eastern front. Good audio book here
Correction on Overlapped and Interleaved Roadwheels Interleaved refers to multiple layers if wheels, more 3 or more, you can effectively think of it as weaving in a way. Overlapped refers to 2 layers of wheels, one layer over another, one overlapping another.
Do you plan to do a cross section look at the Tiger 1 and 2? Both are quite iconic and it would be an interesting look at the two
Thank you for explaining what M.A.N. stands for. For years I have seen the name when travelling though Germany and on German trucks. But when I first noticed them, it was so long ago the internet didn't exist yet so I couldn't google them. And later I never thought about looking them up again. I just figured, it's a German truck manufacturer named MAN, just like our Dutch truck manufacturer is named DAF (Van Doorne's Automobiel Fabriek heh). So now I finally know what MAN stands for: Maschinenfabrik Augsburg-Nürnberg AG Oh, and AG stands for Aktiengesellschaft which means stock corporation or shares corporation. Incidentally, Nürnberg is the German name for Nuremberg in English, you know, where the war crimes trials were held following the end of WW2.
@kingwolf687
10 ай бұрын
I, as a german, only learned this today aswell. I guarantee you, a majority of germans won't know what MAN stands for.
@rosaria8384
10 ай бұрын
Same. Saw many trucks under the MAN logo. Learned the full name today
Very professional, well done. Thanks
designer #1: "Instead of designing a new tank, why don't we just copy the T34?" designer #2: "Mein Gott, are you kidding? Do you realize how simple a design the T34 is? As Germans, the one thing we don't do is simple!!"😂😂
@SnoopEastwood
10 ай бұрын
I hate nazis
@2003AudiS3
10 ай бұрын
The t34 was a garbage tank
@rafaa4988
10 ай бұрын
@@2003AudiS3yes, but as well as panther. Two most overhyped tanks of the war.
@andrewvo2155
10 ай бұрын
@@rafaa4988 not really, the first generations sure, but every tank goes through that phase. By the later versions, it had the best reliability of any German tank as well as being only just slightly more expensive than a panzer 4. All of this done in a few years rather than the longer time every other tank had to work out the kinks.
@hi-Larry-ous
10 ай бұрын
@2003AudiS3 the German captured ones are nice
Great tank, video and presentation.
thanks for featuring my favorite tank
One for many Panzers of choice for the Kuromorimine Girls' Academy in the Girls und Panzer anime and also one of my favourite tanks along with the Tiger and King Tiger.
@reconzero5699
10 ай бұрын
Wtf is that
@yourcasualfinn2213
10 ай бұрын
@@reconzero5699Some game where anime girls use ww2 era tanks, i know, fucking weird
@filipvandel237
10 ай бұрын
A fellow man of culture I see.
@graustreifbrombeerkralle1078
10 ай бұрын
@@yourcasualfinn2213 It's not a game, it's a manga and an anime.
@yourcasualfinn2213
10 ай бұрын
@@graustreifbrombeerkralle1078 Which also has a game about it, look it up
i saw a Panther in Munster! i adore its design, thank you for this video
Ah, the tanks known to us as The Tiger and Panther Tanks, such magnificent beasts like their namesakes.
Nice video, thank you! 🎉🎉🎉
Finally a video about the Panthers and not making jokes or memes about the "transmission broke"
I'd love to see more videos like this but with other tanks. Great video, keep up the good work
Once again I'm being reminded of Panther model kit standing on the shelf and how I once though if I should make either post war french one out of it or kitbash it into hypothetical "IDF Panther" by doing the same thing to it as they have done to their M4 Shermans...
0:31 That tank is so good it was given marks of excellence before it even saw combat lmao
bro your narrative is another level
Beautiful tank
Nice video thanks, only one thing, the Panther G you're showing in your vid is a late war production with the modified gun mantlet,. Most of the production of Panther G's had the gun mantlet used for the other variants. The rear sides of the Panther G were also modified to protect the fuel tank. In Normandie, photos show mixed variant of this vehicle, like a turret of Panther D placed on a hull of the A variant.
Awesome vid with interesting info. I'd never heard of the infrared tech on tanks before. I'd read of it being used in limited numbers on German half tracks in the Ardennes Offensive.
Don't forget its optics. German main gun optics were the best throughout the war, and the Panther was no exception. The TZF 12 sight was an excellent sight, coupled with the 7.5cm KwK 42 L/70, the Panther was unmatched in long range engagements. Not even the fabled Pershing with it's 90mm main gun could compete. Most people don't realize that the US's 90mm acted more like the German 88mm than anything else (obviously quite impressive in its own right).
@henrikhilskov
4 ай бұрын
The original plan was that an 60 mm gun would had been sufficient for german tanks with subcaliber ammunition using tungsten core. However the shortage of tungsten forecd the germans to upgrade to a bigger caliber to get more speed on a bullet using steel as a core.
Good Video/Info.
The Cross Section of tanks is a great idea!
No matter how good the panther was when you've a country with the resources to create shipyards out of swamps and get vast quantities of kit just about anywhere or an island nation where the head politician can be challenged in his tactical and strategic thinking by those with more experience or general with the genius of Zhukov, sooner or later, you're going to be in that bunker doing what you should have done years ago. Germany had some interesting bits of kit, much of it over engineered when their resources were already ebbing away. I'm with James Holland and Al Murray on this; logistics is the key.
Would love a panzer 4 version of this series
In the 1980s T34 production was estimated at 45-48,000. Early 2000 it was revised to 55-57000. Not it has jumped to 84,000. By 2040 I hope to see it cap at an even 100,000
Thank you for this vid ❤
Love this channel
Those tanks including the Tiger were put in production assuming Case Blau would succeed in augmenting Germany's oil supply. They were incredible gas guzzlers that needed that oil to continue the War of Movement... but as we saw the situation wasn't what was hoped for when they came into production by 1943. This is why the mismatch also costed a great deal to the Wermacht in basically sophisticated moving Pillboxes for a static war of attrition Germany couldn't win given its limited resources.
Excellent video!
Recently saw a Panther at the German Tank Museum. The Panther is f huge!
I just seen this and know it will be a awesome video
Great video and great animation as well.
If Mustache man had built Only panthers and not tigers, he still would have lost, but it probably would have gone better for him
@StupidPerson-dh9bj
8 ай бұрын
@VIPER5529 oh yeah cause the tiger didn't have basically all the same issues. On top of that, the tiger's breakthrough potential was completely gone by 44' because Germany was no longer on offense, rather defense. And the reason they used disabled panthers as pilboxes in berlin is because they literally couldn't repair them at the point they were in. Same goes for the tigers, they didn't have the Logistics or supplies to repair them anymore by the time the Reds got to Berlin. To try and compare Tiger's in there prime vs Panthers at a low point is a bit of a strawman, ya fucking wehraboo
I didn’t think the voice was from a person😂, he has an amazing voice
Y’all should make a video like this for the tiger tank
Can you do the Tiger next?
@nopro1510
10 ай бұрын
Simple History have tiger video
@DavidRaab-cr5om
10 ай бұрын
@@nopro1510 with cross section?
@meyr1992
10 ай бұрын
why do people only ask for german tanks, they lost the war for a reason
Can you make a video about the austrian burstyn tank? It was developed bevor WW1
Another flaw of the Panther was the loader’s position. It was on the right side of the turret meaning the majority of loaders would be using their off hands to load the gun. It was also somewhat cramped which required the loader to bring the long shells up and over the breech to load it. While not catastrophic this reduced the rate of fire of the main gun.
@ivvan497
10 ай бұрын
Everyone quoting chieftain like a holly gospel when the guy is like 2 meters tall and varely fits even in modern MBT.
@henrikhilskov
4 ай бұрын
You are not right regarding the loader. Most of the time his position was turning his back toward the gun to pick up ammunition from the storage bins. His RIGHT arm the strong one was under the bullet holding the majority of the weight and only using the left arm as guide and to balance the bullet. Then turning AROUND to put the grenate into the gun still holding the right arm below the grenate and when the front of the grenate was in the gun then he removed the right arm and pushed with the left arm the grenate into the gun. End of story. Next Even the grenate for the 88 mm L/71 gun "only" weith 20 kg. and most soldiers at that time was trained for manual work so they were in average much stronger than today soldiers and because they also was shorter there were actual more energy pr m2 muscel than an soldier today have.
I have a suggestion. Can you do a video about mercenaries and their role in warfare.
Would love to see you do the st chamond next
Perfect timing! I was just about to start up War Thunder!
the interleaved wheels are more of a liability than 'evenly distibuting' the weight, thicker and larger wheels like the t-34's are just as good on that aspect
dude that thing is hard to kill in warthunder, cant wait to get the APDS in warthunder centurion mk1
@Callsign_Baru_
10 ай бұрын
just shoot it on the side
@vynicle2284
10 ай бұрын
shoot the mantlet
Great video but there are several mistakes. The Panther 2 production did not run out of time. It was originally developed to have stronger side armour to defeat the Soviet anti tank rifle. They found out that adding schurzen to the side of the normal Panther did the same job, so there was no need for the Panther 2 to go into production. The effective armour thickness of the Panther's front armour was 138mm. The main defect with the Panther was the reliability of it's final drive.
@rolandhunter
5 ай бұрын
The reliability of it's final drive was fixed in mid 1944. (april-may)
I never could have imagined the Narrator with that face.
The crew has to be trained to work as a team. The optics for the main gun have to be on line with the projectile trajectory. You can’t afford to miss your first shot.
@daveybyrden3936
9 ай бұрын
Then how come the training manual teaches you to "bracket" with several shots?
@657449
9 ай бұрын
@@daveybyrden3936 Once you fire, you give your position away. Tanks travel in groups and you have to quickly engage the others before you retire. You can’t afford to fire groups of shots at the first tank .
Danke Simple History! My personal favorite German Fighting Vehicle.
They even found cigarette butts and other things inside of the panthers working parts, ie transmission fuel line etc from force labor building the tanks. They did that to help try and break them down more in the field
@henrikhilskov
4 ай бұрын
I dont think it was a common thing to use cigarette butts at that time. Next it was slave labour there dont have any cigaretts...
One of the first concepts of a main battle tank.
If you look closely the Panthers cupala hatch is open this was common as the hatch had a handle that had to be rotated to open it so panther commanders would leave the open so if they got hit and there was a fire the commander could easily get out
Shes a beautiful tank, wonderfully crafted, but yes, in some cases, quantity can overpower quality. If the enemy can pump out 10 tanks for every 1 you produce, while your 1 may be superior in quality, it is going to get overrun eventually and when its lost, you now have to make another one.
pretty sure ther panthers frontal hull could be 130mm on averge and depending on the shell i think regular ap it would be around 160mm and 180mm.
I would like to request a cross section like this for other tanks of the second world war like the tiger or sherman
Please do a video comparing central vs allied power trenches in ww1
FYI there was sloped armor way before the T-34. Castles were sloped for a reason.
A video on early cold war french tanks would be nice
@Kriegloaf
10 ай бұрын
True
You should do a remake of the Tiger Tank.
I like your Video clips about Tanks.
The origins of much modern technology can be traced back to the Second World War, from jet (and by extension, space) technology to computer science. It is pretty amazing to think that most of the development was done in just a few short years.
Cool video 👍😎
You guys should a vedio on bismarck battleship or vetorio vennetto those would be great to watch
The Panther II was cancelled because it was found that installing a Schurzen armoured skirts on the panthers side was a better option. Since that was a cheaper option. That also did not disrupt production of Panther tanks.
My great grandfather told me that if the Panther had a better powertrain, it would have been the best tank at the time.
Can you do life inside a is2 I feel like that would be a good video
Please make a video for the Tiger 1 too.
The Germans are genius in weaponry. Their innovative designs & way ahead technology really sends shivers done the spine of the enemies. Real force to reckon with.
@flycatchful
10 ай бұрын
They still lost.
@gnuzwo1lk909
10 ай бұрын
realistically, it lost because the *WHOLE* world was against them
@simple history, do a tiger 1&2 tanks version video, too. I am just asking if you guys are doing one in the future .
Thank you for this history on Germany Tank design 😊 I think it was very smart of Germany to get a captured Russian tank and design a main gun around what it takes to disable a Russian tank. Testing of what main gun needs to go through Russian armor on Tank 😊 something that I think American Tank building lacked.
Kurt Knispel was the highlight scouring tank ace during WW2. Knispel is created with 168 tank kills while commanding a Panther.
@daveybyrden3936
10 ай бұрын
I don't think that Knispel ever crewed a Panther. He got a lot of kills as a gunner in a Tiger, and later he was commander of a Tiger II. Where did you get your info?
@Sturmovik82
10 ай бұрын
and of course this is not a real number, the way the German "aces" confirmed it was only from their words, which were then multiplied by propaganda
@ivvan497
10 ай бұрын
@@Sturmovik82and of course you have the same source as him: "trust me bro"
@Sturmovik82
10 ай бұрын
@@ivvan497 and of course you can come to this by yourself just by reading a lot of German memoirs how the counting was done
@TheGamingMotionTGM
10 ай бұрын
We should give him a KF-51 with its manual, new crew guide or something to made him familiar with it. Plus points if he beat his own kills.
I cant wait to get a cross section on the Tiger 1.
It's a tank, with no panther inside 😢
There's a few issues with "PANTHER IS THE BEST GERMAN TANK!". I'll give you a couple of examples. *A couple.* The panther was just like the M4 sherman, T-34, and A13 series. Allow me to just simply explain this. Panther (all versions) Reliable Good gun Relatively good armor Cheap Easy to produce M4 sherman: Reliable Good gun Relatively good armor Cheap Easy to produce A13: Reliable Good gun Relatively good armor Cheap Easy to produce T-34: Reliable Good gun Relatively good armor Cheap Easy to produce Do you see the similarities? All of these tanks are powerful in a head on, they have good cannons and have good armor, but only from the front, the panther was just the strongest of these, and had more equipment. This means, if you see any of these tanks go head on, M4 versus T-34, it would take a while to get a proper pen to knock them out. But, if it's on the side, anything that is a cannon can penetrate it. It was meant for ease to produce and simplicity to use. Literally the propaganda I use when someone says any of these: "T-34 IS THE BEST TANK OF WW2!" "A13 IS THE BEST TANK OF WW2!" "M4 IS THE BEST TANK OF WW2!" "PANTHER IS THE BEST TANK OF WW2!" If I had to put these on a scale on which is best and which is worst, here's what I believe: Panther is the best of the options. (more powerful since it was built on a larger budget.) T-34 comes next. (Able to be used alot, and is very easily maintained and maneuverable.) M4 sherman. (Produced with extreme ease and was very powerful for price-to-performance ratio.) A-13 (Produced with overly ease and was weak. It was in early war, so understandeable. No angled armor.) Best on top, worst on bottom. *Ease to produce, simplicity to use.*
@agooddemoman8603
9 ай бұрын
Im not an expert on this but werent most t34s armor heat treated to such a degree that the armor would become very hard, in a way that if a strong projectile hit the armor would not be penetrated, but the crew would be most certainly dead. With what i know i wouldnt say the t34s armor was good, in design then sure
@4T3hM4kr0n
5 ай бұрын
@@agooddemoman8603 that is true, T-34's were also of varying quality as they were manufactured in bulk by whoever they could throw into the factories. Panthers were overengineered and required a competent crew to operate it as well as enough fuel and spare parts to keep it effective (just like with the Tiger 1). The sherman on the other hand was VERY easy to replace, manufacture, easy to use and easily upgradable as well as easy to train new crews on.
6:16 no, the side skirts protected the lower hull from anti-tank rifles and shaped charges. 7:36 you put the track sprite over the hull sprite...
Long story short Like all tanks it wasn’t very comfortable!😂
Excellent docos
The field engineers for the Panther didn't have an easy life.. *cough cough* transmission.
@yourcasualfinn2213
10 ай бұрын
You are talking about the transmission of the D variant, the later variants had better transmissions
@sapiensiski
10 ай бұрын
@@yourcasualfinn2213their final drives still lasted for like 150km lmfao
@yourcasualfinn2213
10 ай бұрын
@@sapiensiski Thats enough to send atleast a few allied tanks to heaven
@sapiensiski
10 ай бұрын
@@yourcasualfinn2213 well they never got out of the factories since they got bombed. I see you in every german tank wanking video lmfao. Maybe you ought to just let the wehrabooism go. Also why are you so bitter against the allies? You do know that hitler would have slaughtered the finns after the war, right?
@ivvan497
10 ай бұрын
@@sapiensiskiwhen driven by french, yes