The US Battleship with the Most Jaw-Dropping Guns Ever Seen.

After relentless Allied bombardments on Okinawa, the last bastion before Japan's shores, April 12, 1945, witnessed a drastic turn. Pushed to their limits, the Japanese forces orchestrated a massive kamikaze assault, unparalleled in scale and desperation.
That afternoon, the sky above Okinawa transformed into a battleground. A swarm of kamikaze planes, each manned by a pilot with a singular, grim mission, descended upon the Allied ships. Among those in the crosshairs was USS Idaho, a battleship whose valor and might had become the stuff of legend.
On this day, USS Idaho-affectionately known as the Big Spud-braced for an unprecedented challenge. Five kamikaze pilots singled her out, diving out of the sun's blinding light in a tactical maneuver designed to confuse and overwhelm her gunners. This approach rendered Idaho's lower defenses, the 20-millimeter guns, ineffective as the aircraft skimmed perilously close to the ocean's surface.
Yet, as the kamikaze planes bore down, the ship's 40-millimeter guns were ready to destroy anything that dared come too close to the Big Spud.

Пікірлер: 188

  • @jamses23
    @jamses23Ай бұрын

    As a native Idahoan, I am always excited when I can find anything about The Big Spud

  • @leftistsarenotpeople

    @leftistsarenotpeople

    Ай бұрын

    Ever read about the Shuri line, in particular the Shuri Castle strong point during the Okinawa campaign? Well, during the Naval bombardment most ALL the newer 'Fast' battleships with those 'super uber' 16 inch guns and those earth moving super heavy shells they used pounded and pounded and pounded that defensive line for weeks and never could quite reduce the Castle strong point. Welllllll, out of any better more 'modern' ideas.... in they called 'The Big Spud', not expecting her smaller 14 inchers to do any better, and she absolutely NAILED the Shuri Castle... WITH HER FIRST SALVO.... turning that entire bunker complex to dust! I even hesitate to admit that because my beloved USS North Carolina ( which I grew up very close to in Wilimington, N.C.) was there, took shots at it too and couldn't do anything difinitive against that strong point of note either. Yeah, BIG SPUD put the boots to 'em!

  • @ruger8412
    @ruger8412Ай бұрын

    The big spud! I like it

  • @joehayward2631
    @joehayward2631Ай бұрын

    The old battleship left Long Beach, California, i was so lucky i was Marine Det USS MISSOURI, 1988 to 1990. Our home port with USS NEW JERSEY was LONG BEACH,CALIFORNIA. I think thats pretty cool. When we would go to Pearl Harbor USS MISSOURI and USS NEW JERSEY had a great honor docking at battleship row.

  • @RetiredSailor60

    @RetiredSailor60

    Ай бұрын

    My brother served on USS Missouri during the first Gulf War

  • @Bdub1952
    @Bdub1952Ай бұрын

    Idaho baby, it ain't just potatoes.

  • @ThomasWIck-ms5tj
    @ThomasWIck-ms5tjАй бұрын

    My father, Raymond J. Wick, served aboard the Idaho from Jan. 1944 until discharged in the spring of 1946. His battle station was the port 20mm AA guns, a bank of 3 of them. He told me about this attack which was the only time the ship was hit. He also had a book that the crew put together at the end of the war with pictures of the plane being shot down and splashing right off his AA gun mounts. The picture was taken from the USS Texas which was right behind the Idaho. They would eventually enter a floating drydock for repairs and there is a National Geographic article I believe in 1946 that covers that story and shows her in the floating drydock.

  • @donholiday4942
    @donholiday4942Ай бұрын

    American battleships refitted for modern warfare would be able to carry staggering amount of missiles . Adding one of these ships to each aircraft carrier strike group would be able to carry enough missiles to make projecting power even more meaningful . A battleship like Missouri could carry enough missiles to turn iran into a parking lot .

  • @MatchGrade08

    @MatchGrade08

    Ай бұрын

    It would not make sense to use the same hulls. They would want to make it more destroyer shaped with flat back to carry more. The idea is great to have armor and hide far off to the side but they would have to make a huge amount of the fancy new armors and we dont really have the steel industry or regular industry working well right now. They have to bring down fosil fuel price for steel or whatever they chose to use. Basically have to mine more if they want any armor at an ok price.

  • @Sion_Revan

    @Sion_Revan

    Ай бұрын

    HLC: It can fire many much flocks of boat missiles.

  • @donholiday4942

    @donholiday4942

    Ай бұрын

    @@MatchGrade08 it makes perfect sense it would be able to carry more missiles than 13 destroyers . Destroyers are thin skins tin cans that are very easy for enemy weapons to penetrate . A single missile from a fighter , or single torpedo from a submarine, or a single sea mine is enough to take a destroyer out of the fight permanently . A battleship doesn't get taken out of the fight so easily . An before you say Arizona . Modern American capital ships are nuclear powered . Nuclear power is much more efficient than coal , oil , or diesel . Any refit of an American battleship would obviously involve nuclear power . and obviously involve removal of the obsolete 16 inch guns . With a modern technology refit a smaller crew would be required to run a battleship today than in the days of world war 1 and world war 2 . With 16 inch guns removed you would not need a huge group of men handing 2000 pound shells and gunpowder bails .

  • @istoppedcaring6209

    @istoppedcaring6209

    19 күн бұрын

    cheap drones would be even better, launched from tethers they could wreak havoc on any defense system

  • @iowa61

    @iowa61

    Күн бұрын

    @@MatchGrade08 That is frankly preposterous. One of the things the IOWA class battleships do very well is absorb new systems, weapons and modifications. The dozens of vertical launch cells would be fitted on the existing Tomahawk amored box launcher decks. No additional armor would be required.

  • @bernardvonderheide1268
    @bernardvonderheide1268Ай бұрын

    They been saying since ww2 that battle ships are no longer of use but they keep bringing them in to do battle 😎

  • @DavidFMayerPhD

    @DavidFMayerPhD

    Ай бұрын

    If they can be used effectively (vis-à-vis other weapons), then they are NOT obsolete.

  • @ScottC-od6fh
    @ScottC-od6fhАй бұрын

    There is no hacking artillery!! Once sent!!

  • @DavidFMayerPhD

    @DavidFMayerPhD

    Ай бұрын

    It is impossible to jam the guidance systems of unguided artillery shells, because they have NONE.

  • @rayaznavorian8708
    @rayaznavorian8708Ай бұрын

    Hope to see a video on the USS Massachusetts one day.

  • @LittleFarmer14

    @LittleFarmer14

    Ай бұрын

    Such an awesome ship man, I live right in Rhode Island and I’ve been going to the Massachusetts since I was a little boy. So many veterans, artifacts, and things to see. Unbelievable warships.

  • @Quiteclueless
    @QuitecluelessАй бұрын

    I’ve always wondered why the Navy didn’t make canister shot for the 16 inch guns. imagine Kamikazes trying to fly through that. 😂

  • @Thenotfunnyperson

    @Thenotfunnyperson

    Ай бұрын

    The Japanese did.

  • @wendielangborders4116

    @wendielangborders4116

    Ай бұрын

    Beehives

  • @Sion_Revan

    @Sion_Revan

    Ай бұрын

    Stolen from wiki Sanshikidan (三式弾, "type 3 shell") was a form of ammunition: a World War II-era combined shrapnel and incendiary anti-aircraft round used by the Imperial Japanese Navy. The type of layered construction of the warheads were generically referred to as Beehive rounds. The shells were intended to put up a barrage of flame through which any aircraft attempting to attack would have to navigate. However, U.S. pilots considered these shells to be more of a pyrotechnics display than an effective anti-aircraft weapon.

  • @Intrepid42643

    @Intrepid42643

    24 күн бұрын

    Heh

  • @allanboyer2769
    @allanboyer2769Ай бұрын

    Twelve 14 inch guns are a lot of firepower, but, then again, so are the nine 16 inch guns of the North Carolina, South Dakota, and Iowa classes.

  • @Fraser-369
    @Fraser-369Ай бұрын

    The USS Texas is the last survivor of the 1910s US Battleships

  • @thefluffyone2353

    @thefluffyone2353

    Ай бұрын

    that is true, and it is the only US naval ship to fight in all 5 Theaters of World War II not to mention the USS Texas literally flooded half of the ship to continue shelling the Germans after D-Day and I believe it was the only ship that was crewed by US Marines

  • @Princess_Celestia_

    @Princess_Celestia_

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@thefluffyone2353Yeap.

  • @allanboyer2769

    @allanboyer2769

    Ай бұрын

    I got to see USS Texas a few years ago when she was in Houston getting repairs to her hull from rust and decay. I believe she has been moved since then. Still an impressive ship.

  • @bosnmatecaddie

    @bosnmatecaddie

    Ай бұрын

    My father took me and my brother to see the Texas when we were children, living so close, east Houston, it was something he liked to do, playing and running around the ship was fun, little did I know that years later I was join the US Navy and serve my country, she's the last of her kind and I hope she's around for many years to come.

  • @Fraser-369

    @Fraser-369

    Ай бұрын

    @@bosnmatecaddie She came out of dry dock about a month ago. Torpedo blisters repaired and major stuff done to her hull. That grand old ship looks good with fresh paint…

  • @walkawayfool
    @walkawayfoolАй бұрын

    So ive just come across your channel and have watched a dozen or so videos an still watching as i watch this 1. Love it your narrative/ knowledge and detail is outstanding im subd now the thing that gets me everytime is your intro to each vid no mucking round just straight to its awesome 👍👊

  • @ronaldcole7415
    @ronaldcole741528 күн бұрын

    “The Big Spud”! Awesome!

  • @daystatesniper01
    @daystatesniper01Ай бұрын

    Not a bad video of brave sailors and a well endowed ship but jaw dropping guns ??? hmmmmm

  • @sirmalus5153

    @sirmalus5153

    Ай бұрын

    Makes a good title for click bait though.

  • @grugbug4313
    @grugbug4313Ай бұрын

    Solid! Top KEK! Peace be with you.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986Ай бұрын

    did it have proximity fuses in shells?

  • @imnayanger4877
    @imnayanger4877Ай бұрын

    WOW this battle ship is badass with giant tripple guns and best AA gun 👌🏻🔫🚢

  • @dutchman7216
    @dutchman7216Ай бұрын

    Well done gentleman.

  • @denisecanaday5677
    @denisecanaday5677Ай бұрын

    USS Idaho was never equipped with turbo-electric propulsion.

  • @larryentwistle8506

    @larryentwistle8506

    Ай бұрын

    I'm thinking..... boilers

  • @fgoogle5576

    @fgoogle5576

    Ай бұрын

    TRUE. also, 14" guns are not "jaw dropping"

  • @partygrove5321

    @partygrove5321

    Ай бұрын

    @@fgoogle5576 The newer North Carolina and Iowa class ones had 16 inchers.

  • @ShadowOfAnEpicSaxmanExclusive
    @ShadowOfAnEpicSaxmanExclusiveАй бұрын

    How many errors is this video going to have

  • @aurorajones8481

    @aurorajones8481

    Ай бұрын

    Start a list of the many errors. I have no clue so i cant say.

  • @StacyBaldwin-qv5cj

    @StacyBaldwin-qv5cj

    Ай бұрын

    Haha right, this channel gets as much wrong as they do right

  • @leftistsarenotpeople

    @leftistsarenotpeople

    Ай бұрын

    ALL of them!

  • @Mr-mopar
    @Mr-moparАй бұрын

    I only imagine what a modern battleship would look like..maybe a battery of rail guns with a battery of laser guns..hypersonic missles with som kind of metal storm drone launchers..would be wild to see one laid out with future tech.

  • @jeffreymckie3328
    @jeffreymckie3328Ай бұрын

    Maybe not previously seen but certainly not ever seen.

  • @kevinquist
    @kevinquist3 күн бұрын

    My grandfather fought in the pacific. scarred him for life. "human beings to do NOT do to other human beings what those ****'s did to people". 'they were just awful'. he would never elaborate.

  • @david_porthouse
    @david_porthouseАй бұрын

    So how were Idaho’s guns controlled? What sort of fuzes did the shells have? None the wiser here.

  • @briangulley6027

    @briangulley6027

    Ай бұрын

    With an X-Box controller of course, some people so dumb.😜

  • @joeatwood6905
    @joeatwood6905Ай бұрын

    I have never before heard of this ship being called the "Big Spud." What is the source for this?

  • @tobysmith3668

    @tobysmith3668

    Ай бұрын

    She's the Idaho..and Idaho sells Idaho potatoes....

  • @timinashton
    @timinashtonАй бұрын

    6:45 Iceland? Iceland is not close to Alaska or Japan.

  • @patrickgriffitt6551

    @patrickgriffitt6551

    Ай бұрын

    In fact it's in a different ocean on the other side of the world.

  • @bigredgreg1

    @bigredgreg1

    Ай бұрын

    Yet somehow they managed to sail from one part of the globe to another. 🇺🇸

  • @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    Ай бұрын

    @@bigredgreg1 Isn't that the advantage of having a navy that can go anywhere there are oceans?

  • @davidvines6498

    @davidvines6498

    13 күн бұрын

    Iceland is close to Alaska, if you cross across the Arctic Ocean

  • @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    13 күн бұрын

    @@davidvines6498 Yeah, almost the same planet. What is wrong with these critical people?

  • @onlythewise1
    @onlythewise1Ай бұрын

    my dad was a plank owner on the iowa bb61 fought in ww2

  • @sharzadgabbai4408
    @sharzadgabbai4408Ай бұрын

    Ive flown c130s and crewed cutters to Alaska. I never floated.

  • @AROBASPARK
    @AROBASPARKАй бұрын

    If I didn't recall the Big Idaho Potato Truck adds, I would be scratching my head for the whole video as to why she was referred to as the Big Spuds?

  • @joejarvis2497
    @joejarvis2497Ай бұрын

    What? Iceland, then California, back to Iceland, then to the Marshall Islands? I think you need a better editor.

  • @tm13tube

    @tm13tube

    Ай бұрын

    Iceland is in the Atlantic. Could US Navy ships go through the Panama Canal?

  • @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    13 күн бұрын

    @@tm13tube Carrying them across the frozen Arctic BY HAND would never be expected or anticipated by any enemy foreign or domestic. Might even surprise the Canadians.

  • @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    @WilliamMurphy-uv9pm

    13 күн бұрын

    @@tm13tube Yes but there were size restrictions. Now, with the new canal and enlarged locks next to the older ones, much large cruise ships can traverse the Panama Canal.

  • @Wolvieonepunch
    @WolvieonepunchАй бұрын

    must be getting hard up for content cause this is the umpteenth time you've done a vid on the Idaho

  • @philgiglio7922
    @philgiglio7922Ай бұрын

    Okinawa, the fleet that came to stay

  • @yogibarista2818
    @yogibarista2818Ай бұрын

    "as far as the eye could reach" ?

  • @1chish
    @1chish12 күн бұрын

    "the Most Jaw-Dropping Guns Ever Seen"? The Royal Navy's 'Nelson' class had 9 x 16" guns just 7 years after Idaho and every US Navy BB after Colorado had 16" guns.

  • @SlowSTEN
    @SlowSTENАй бұрын

    Just wait till this man hears about the (Sadly Sunk) USS Montana.

  • @dwightrush4247
    @dwightrush4247Ай бұрын

    Yeah but after decommission what happened to her!?!?

  • @zerk9092
    @zerk9092Ай бұрын

    16in

  • @ozymandias1758
    @ozymandias1758Ай бұрын

    8:18 her 5" 25cal guns were replaced with by ten 5" 38cal guns in single enclosed mounts, enhancing her AA capabilities? Did he get it wrong? I have never seen a single enclosed 5" mount, and havent heard of this mount before, particilarly not for AA use, on a USN battleship. Sounds more like what the Kriegsmarine used on their capital ships. Can anyone shed any light on this? Edit: I think at this point he meant DUAL mounted enclosures, which is standard secondary armament for USN BBs

  • @kurtwpg

    @kurtwpg

    Ай бұрын

    I don't even understand what they mean by "caliber" here.

  • @ozymandias1758

    @ozymandias1758

    Ай бұрын

    @@kurtwpg so the US Navy determines the caliber of a shell by its length in inches. So the new longer shell would weigh more, utilize more powder resulting in a larger, heavier, harder hitting munition. Like a Magnum treatment of the same diameter 5" shell. Lengthwise.

  • @kurtwpg

    @kurtwpg

    Ай бұрын

    @@ozymandias1758 Thank you

  • @417jumps3
    @417jumps3Ай бұрын

    God war sucks for everyone involved involved….

  • @joejarvis2497

    @joejarvis2497

    Ай бұрын

    Thank you Captain Obvious.

  • @417jumps3

    @417jumps3

    Ай бұрын

    @@joejarvis2497 haha!!!!!! Just trying to be politically correct but I could have said other things!! Don’t want loser KZread to block my comments for 24hts

  • @BugattiONE666
    @BugattiONE666Ай бұрын

    Idaho had 14inch guns, why would they be jawdropping when 16inch/45, 16inch/50, and for the Japanese of course 18inch guns exist?

  • @haroldchase4120

    @haroldchase4120

    Ай бұрын

    Turd horse and Bismarck got smoked by 14 inch guns

  • @thefluffyone2353

    @thefluffyone2353

    Ай бұрын

    yeah, where is the Japanese battleship Yamato at? or the German Bismarck they’re both coral reefs at the bottom of the ocean their 18-inch guns on the Yamato or any other Japanese ship or German ship didn’t do them too well not did it. airplanes took down the battleship Yamato and the Bismarck was shelled continuously by the entire British Navy, and also bombed by the RAF and in the end they waddling their own ship, so it did not fall into enemy. Don’t even get me started on the battleships or for example, USS Texas, which was made prior to World War I and was still one of the most bad ass ships of World War II, it technically wasn’t even a battleship technically what would be considered a super dread and it still kicked everyone’s ass?

  • @BugattiONE666

    @BugattiONE666

    Ай бұрын

    And is anything either of you have just said supposed to correspond with what I said? I didn't even mention Bismarck, 2 of 3 types I mention were American. From the N-Lina/S-Dskota class and Iowa Class

  • @DavidJones-me7yr

    @DavidJones-me7yr

    Ай бұрын

    If I'm not mistaken, the Iowa class had 16 inch 55 caliber guns?

  • @BugattiONE666

    @BugattiONE666

    Ай бұрын

    @@DavidJones-me7yr Your Mistaken

  • @mikejacob3536
    @mikejacob3536Ай бұрын

    How did the Idaho get from the Aleutian Islands to Iceland on the way to Japan? Does no one own a globe?

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhDАй бұрын

    No crew is EVER looking forward to battle deployment.

  • @eriklarson2066
    @eriklarson2066Ай бұрын

    Japan lost at every battle. What were they thinking?

  • @erikbarrett8523
    @erikbarrett8523Ай бұрын

    The most jaw dropping on a U.S. Navy battleship. Not the most jaw dropping ever.

  • @MatchGrade08

    @MatchGrade08

    Ай бұрын

    You think 14 inch guns were the most Jaw dropping for the US? Come on it was clearly the dual 5 inch 38 that were jaw dropping. 15 rounds a minute per gun. Thats 30 rounds per turret per minute with multiple turrets. If your fine with melting them down that sounds like a constant roar. Constant flames is rather than one blast is a much better spectacle. The other nations were not real jaw dropping though. 18 inch 45 looks pretty stubby on the Yamato to the lean long 16 inch on the Iowas. Slow fire rate too. Nearly equal guns but ones nearly double speed though us ships varied by about 20 percent so both could be faster or a little slower but who knows how slow Yamato would be on a bad day. If you mean not on a battleship there are 18 inch 47 cal mark 1s laying around in the US. Still it would be a better case to say the Idaho battleship was the best looking instead of the armament being the most jaw dropping.

  • @larrykopp1166
    @larrykopp1166Ай бұрын

    @scottmeredith: Those sailors would have keel hauled Donnie bone spurs.

  • @edmundp123
    @edmundp12327 күн бұрын

    Decommissioned. Surveyed. Melted down?

  • @AddisonLawton230
    @AddisonLawton230Ай бұрын

    I really wish The United States Kept all of the Battleships and made them into Museum Ships. 😢

  • @dougmoore4326
    @dougmoore4326Ай бұрын

    Anti aircraft guns do not “pump lead”🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

  • @fgoogle5576
    @fgoogle5576Ай бұрын

    CLICK BAIT Most US battleships of this era were fitted with 16" guns, not 14". Some Japanese ships had 18" guns. So how does Idaho have "the most jaw dropping guns" at 14"? Oh, improved AA guns? Nope, still not jaw dropping. Explanation? CLICK BAIT AGAIN, always with DARK SEAS

  • @richardtooley1795
    @richardtooley1795Ай бұрын

    If the narrator speak like a human - I could watch it to the end.

  • @bf-696
    @bf-696Ай бұрын

    "Jaw dropping"? Still waiting to hear what they were. Click bait.

  • @bobbymac1947
    @bobbymac1947Ай бұрын

    we need these ships back on active service.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666Ай бұрын

    Note that the Iowa CLASS (4 ships) all had the same 16" guns - as did the immediately preceding South Dakota class (also 4 ships). Not even CLOSE to "the most jaw-dropping", the German "Gustav" railgun would arguably be THAT at ballpark TWICE the diameter and MUCH longer (and much longer range with a much heavier projectile). Title isn't even clickbait, it's an outright LIE.

  • @zvast
    @zvastАй бұрын

    Is this AI voice?

  • @frankcooke3859
    @frankcooke3859Ай бұрын

    Hypersonic Missiles. 😂😂😂. Sea Drones. 😅😅😅.

  • @tm13tube
    @tm13tubeАй бұрын

    The Wisconsin is berthed in downtown Norfolk, VA beside Nauticus, a museum.

  • @MakerBoyOldBoy
    @MakerBoyOldBoyАй бұрын

    1:42 The title is bullshit clickbait which does disservice to the Idaho memory. As a commentator mentioned the Yamato and her sister ship Musashi had 18" guns which never fired in combat. The effective guns are those that do damage. Apparently, size doesn't matter.

  • @jpmtlhead39
    @jpmtlhead39Ай бұрын

    If 14'' guns are jaw-dropping,what to call the 18'' guns of the Yamato and Musashi...??!!!

  • @ianhood8081

    @ianhood8081

    Ай бұрын

    Coral reefs... 😐

  • @user-gt3nu4qr5z
    @user-gt3nu4qr5zАй бұрын

    Can yall imagine if they made a ship for biden? The uss biden....it would probably be a coast gaurd boat.

  • @richardtooley1795
    @richardtooley1795Ай бұрын

    Must be an American thing.

  • @lanceleavitt7472
    @lanceleavitt7472Ай бұрын

    Someone please tell the idiotic politicians to quit starting wars.

  • @freddiecarr7602
    @freddiecarr7602Ай бұрын

    The Houthis said bring it on----

  • @richardsuggs8108
    @richardsuggs8108Ай бұрын

    Really there was little that the Japanese could do in Alaska.

  • @bigredgreg1

    @bigredgreg1

    Ай бұрын

    I think the video mentioned the Japanese presence in the Aleutian Islands was a diversionary tactic to draw American forces away from the Battle of Midway.

  • @thomasbullen5239

    @thomasbullen5239

    Ай бұрын

    I always thought they should have been left to "wither on the vine". Re-supply would have been near impossible.

  • @cmw9876
    @cmw9876Ай бұрын

    An interesting relationship between the title . . . and the truth? Yes. BS as usual. Even the best stories can be ruined with BS titles. Shame 'Tube. 👎

  • @stargazer5784

    @stargazer5784

    Ай бұрын

    The firing of, and damage caused by, any WW2 battleship grade main battery would be the most jaw dropping display of firepower that that you could ever hope to witness. As an example, during tests it was shown that the 16" MK7 guns on an Iowa class could drop plunging fire onto a target that was capable of penetrating 30 feet of solid concrete from miles away. The 14" guns of the Idaho would have a somewhat less, but similar capability.

  • @MrBenski81
    @MrBenski81Ай бұрын

    Back to his incohesive overspeed narrative shit again. Watched 10 seconds before thumbs down.

  • @tonynannenga1954
    @tonynannenga1954Ай бұрын

    This is a B/S story. My father-in-law Tommy Heckman was one of the 1,500 Alaskan natives called the Alaska guard were the first ins in those islands. By the time anyone else got there they had killed over 40,000 Japanese forces with 1500 men. They had 3 casualties that were not war related. Frost bite and a sprained ankle was the cause of their wounded. They hav been compared to Alexander the great with what they accomplished. By the time the Navy arrived it was already over. The Japanese forces had already left. If you think this story is hogwash get ahold of the Native veterans Center in Anchorage Alaska and they will straighten you out right quick. Your story is a bulshit story. The Navy was not there when they did it.

  • @francislutz8027

    @francislutz8027

    Ай бұрын

    Dead people leave evidence Skeletons, uniforms, service weapons, rations, field equipment, winter weather gear etc. These things don't dissappear. And if even 1 body was missed out of the 40,000 you claimed, someone would have found it by now. Don't believe stories old people tell you. Just smile and nod, then go Google the truth.

  • @scottmeredith3359
    @scottmeredith3359Ай бұрын

    Willing to bet the Idaho had a lift kit and Trump flags flying off it even back then 😂

  • @robertpatterson9594

    @robertpatterson9594

    Ай бұрын

    Trump is a draft dogger he wouldn't have the balls to do what they did

  • @joejarvis2497

    @joejarvis2497

    Ай бұрын

    😄😄😄

  • @mawhayden

    @mawhayden

    Ай бұрын

    I don’t think so, these hero’s believed in America and the constitution.

  • @kaleidoset2569

    @kaleidoset2569

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@mawhaydenexactly it blows my mind how many of these young quote on quote tough guys think that anybody that ever fought in these wars would have believed in anybody like Trump my grandpa was on the USS Enterprise in World War II right through 1945 and afterwards on operation Magic Carpet and and all of my great uncles were in World War II and I guarantee you not one of them would have been able to stand the sight of Donald Trump or any of his minions without puking

  • @mawhayden

    @mawhayden

    Ай бұрын

    @@kaleidoset2569 Hey Buddy I served and I am 62 years old born in 1961, Eisenhower, Reagan and Bush served, Trump did not. Did you know Mr Smarty that Trump did a pass in Vietnam he NEVER Served and he bugged out stating that he had bone spurs so what the hell are you talking about. When it came time to actually fight, Trump clocked out and DID NOT FIGHT, so what the hell you talking about ...ARE YOU DRUNK. by the way, did you serve yourself ?

  • @Happy11807
    @Happy11807Ай бұрын

    THESE GUYS THAT PUT OUT THESE VIDEOS NEED TO FACT CHECK THEIR AI AND OTHER FACTS THAT ARE NOT FACTS !

  • @MrBenski81

    @MrBenski81

    Ай бұрын

    And sack that fkn narrator.