Hi, marine engineering student here, I want to make a comment on the electric drive pods shown in the video at 12:04. This type of propulsion is not more efficient than conventional type of propulsion and here is why. For electric propulsion the diesel engines drive huge generators generating electricity. After that the electricity is transferred to the propeller's electric motor via an high voltage system. Then the electric motor has to turn the electric energy back into motional energy. In all these transitions of energy you lose some efficiency. Furthermore, the huge electric motor straight after the propeller increases drag. That's why this system is less efficient than conventional propulsion. That's also why the biggest container/ cargo ships still use the conventional method. The advantages of the diesel-electric system is (like you said) maneuverability, but also there is more freedom in placing the engines in the ships design, since the engines don't have to be placed directly in front of the propellers. This is why the diesel electric system is massively used on cruise ships and dynamic positioning ships, where efficiency is less of a concern. Cruise ships sail into harbours almost daily, so a ship with more maneuverability saves in costs of hiring tug boats. Also space on a cruise ship is limited so being free in the placement of the engines helps with a compact engine room design. Ships with dynamic positioning don't sail as much but need a system like this to accurately stay in position. For those who have read this, thank you for your time and feel free to ask me any questions! ps. don't mind my english, it's not my native language.

@currentbatches6205

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you; you've made the design compromises very clear.

@fed4ykin

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks, I didn't know anything about any of that.

@chilebike6556

3 жыл бұрын

Is it not the case that cruise ships with a huge hotel load require main engines that are 4 stroke high speed to mainly run alternators, with the consequent reduction in height and possibility of constant running over the two stroke diesel, all of this reflects the commercial application

@sepg5084

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah i find it weird that a diesel electric would be more efficient than a pure diesel on a ship, especially that no batteries were mentioned. It's not like ships operate like cars. Thanks for providing clarification.

@vincentrusso4332

2 жыл бұрын

All your points definitely make sense, thanks for taking the time to break it down. Also have you ever seen the opposing engine design that was featured in the video. Thanks.

This channel is gold. ...every video is gold....who need Netflix

@darrenkastl8160

4 жыл бұрын

@@straenapotheker2985 are you still drunk commrade?

@joeyg29jgjg

3 жыл бұрын

yeah my girlfriend would beg to differ lmao

@arson338

3 жыл бұрын

Not i

@kraziecatclady

3 жыл бұрын

@@joeyg29jgjg lol. Well your girlfriend has bad taste then...

@dr.doppeldecker3832

2 жыл бұрын

It's a matter of time until Netflix will hire KZread creators to produce for them:)

Underrated channel. Guarantee this will eventually get millions of subs. I sure hope so.

@Starklar

4 жыл бұрын

@@liggerstuxin1 much larger problem of today seems to be this idea of immediate knee jerk judgement. appreciation of early discovery of a channel is suddenly taken as a negative and run in for an unopposed touchdown with a misspelled coup de grace.

@Plataani

4 жыл бұрын

Well that escalated fast

@liggerstuxin1

4 жыл бұрын

Joe Average Bingo

@nunyabusiness8538

4 жыл бұрын

i love knowing more about everything. channels like these are like heaven for curious people and i hope they never stop diving deep into these topics

@ekevanderzee9538

4 жыл бұрын

What would be detrimental to you with more others having discovered this channel before you?

You mention the Titanic as a "steam piston engine" ship. But she was a bit of a hybrid. Her drive used two piston engines driving the wing shafts, and they both exhausted into a single low-pressure turbine that drove the centre shaft. Low pressure turbines have an advantage over the low pressure cylinder in a piston engine is allowing the condenser to set up a lower than atmospheric pressure at the exhaust without fear of water droplets forming and causing hydraulic locks in a piston engine cylinder. This was exploited by Parsons in the early all-steam turbine ships as well.

@alext8828

Жыл бұрын

Excellente!

I'm glad to watch this channel grow. He deserves millions of subscribers. It's great to see determined creators replace what The History Channel and Discovery used to be.

@alext8828

Жыл бұрын

He should get a decent narrator and another writer. It doesn't sound like he knows what he's even saying.

So much new information for me to learn packed inside this video with no fanfare, blaring music or other needless production gimmicks. Thank you!

Good video, struck close to home. I'm a mechanical engineer on board a ferry and we are a part of a pilot project currently, during witch our ship is fitted with peak-shaving hybrid solution. Currently our ship has diesel-electric power plant with azipod thrusters and we sail close to Natura 2000 nature protection area, so with EU/government/company go-funding we will be fitted with 670 kWh battery bank to reduce co2/nox emissions and running costs.

@glendooer6211

4 жыл бұрын

Dont want CO2 anywhere plants ..Years ago there use to breath in CO2 when Global Cooling warming came in trees stopped needing CO2..Don't ask me how it works but we need to stop CO2 dry ice and using it in Greenhouses ..This is to save the World.

@SolarWebsite

4 жыл бұрын

@@glendooer6211 That is one very confused post...

@glendooer6211

4 жыл бұрын

@@SolarWebsite No CO2 is causing Global Cooling then Warming and we need to stop CO2 to save the Planet this is why we have Climate change..and spend billions to stop CO2..and remember some of the smartest people want this.

@therealfearsome

4 жыл бұрын

@@glendooer6211 you do realize that CO2 is a trace gas, right? That means it is less than .1% of total atmospheric gases. Get educated, stop listening to leftist propaganda, a get a clue...global warming has been on going since the end of the last ICE AGE

@glendooer6211

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealfearsome Agree but millions think this is the case and want to spend billions stopping CO2

Crazy that some of these only reach 80 rpm. Some small gasoline 2 strokes can get above 15,000 rpm. the torque figures on these diesels must by incredible.

@soaringvulture

4 жыл бұрын

Well, the biggest marine diesels (Wartsila RTA96-C) put out over 100,000 HP. Now if that's an 80RPM engine, the torque is (5252/80)*100,000 or 6,565,000 lb/ft. Let's see a Hemi beat that.

@imthedarknight-8755

2 жыл бұрын

Now imagine if they could rev up to 7k or something, the amount of horsepower on them would be astronomical (horsepower being a function of torque x rpm and all). Granted the fuel tanks would also have to be astronomical

Well, dang. I was hoping for an internal look at the big engines, but got a history lesson. Well done and I learned stuff, just not what I was hoping for. I will be sure to take a moment on Feb 28 to honor Mr. Diesel.

This is crazy how well done your videos are. Quality like any big tv documentary! And the amount of research you obviusly put in to every video is astonishing. I watch them all, and hope that you will keep them coming and that more people will find your channel so you make great money for for your effort

Who says an old dog can't learn something new ? Always enjoy your content , very informative!

This channel is excellent. The fascinating topics (the "Small Distances episode was outstanding), the detail, the knowledge shared... it's a great channel. Would subscribe several times if I could.

request= "make video about LCD, IPS-LCD, OLED, and AMOLED" basically explaining the science of behind screens.

@adrifathudien3299

4 жыл бұрын

i just want to type that bcs i never found that kind of in depth video.

@adrifathudien3299

4 жыл бұрын

the title of the video should be "the evolition of how we display images" kind of

I'm sailing on a 5500grwt supply vessel, we run 4 high speed engines dualfuel engines. The other advantage to dualfuel which you didn't mention is that the engines are usually a lot more efficient running diesiel on low loads.

Thank you for the work you put into this channel. I absolutely love it

learned a lot from this one, thanks....would love to see more on the prop pod technology

I recall at the age of 10, first seeing the diorama of the first shipping route, in the main White Pass and Yukon Route Depot in Whitehorse, Yukon. That was in 1973, shortly after moving here from PEI. My father worked on the train for four years, beginning as a brakeman (the guy who gets out to change the tracks), and continuing on to engineer (the guy who drives the train) and eventually becoming a conductor (the guy responsible for the whole train). So, the White Pass and Yukon Route is definitely in my blood. Thank you for that brief foray into the past.

I might be wrong, but I believe the "hybrid ships", that you mention towards the end, is the same drive-train style as modern railroad car engines.

@Lucius_Chiaraviglio

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, the ones mentioned in this video aren't true hybrids. To be true hybrids, they would have to have some kind of energy storage system that can let the engine and propulsion each operate at their most efficient power ratings, while storing energy to balance the loads, like on a hybrid automobile or bus. This isn't necessarily a bad idea, but on a ship you aren't going to have much chance for regenerative braking, and most of the operation under way is going to be at a constant speed (unless you have a large part of the journey fighting a current, like going upriver), so the incentive to make a true hybrid system isn't much.

As someone who works and a dual fuel vessel (similar to the one you showed in the video you showed a vs485) a wartsila vs4411. the big problem with Dual fuel is the amount of space you loose for cargo. our LNG tank holds about 200m3 of liquid methane, but takes roughly 700m3 of space. Also due to way these vessels operate close to oil platforms with all the engines on on very low power there is a lot of unburnt methane coming out of the funnel which is not very good for the environment.

Thanks for the info!

Wow, Very informative content 👌 Thanks 😊

Underrated channel, glad I found it before it gets millions of subs.

That smoke effect at the 2:10 min mark looks pretty amazing. Thumbs up!

Excellent content, sir!

I follow a lot of naval and history stuff as well as your channel. This is an incredibly cool topic cross :D

Excellent video thank you !!!

Great job 👏

Informative thanks :)

Awesome video. Thank you.

That was awesome!!!

I'm still trying to get my head around how engines work, but this video was interesting even without managing to grasp that! Congrats :)

@User0000000000000004

3 жыл бұрын

Are you an idiot?

@CreedManiac99

3 жыл бұрын

@@User0000000000000004 I'm pretty sure you would look like an idiot too if you tried understanding something of which you don't well grasp the basics of. At least have some self-awareness.

Brilliant channel!

Very educational. Well done, thanks.

Fantastic video. Good job

Well done!

Those cathedral engines are amazing.

Great video!

Well done - some minor additions and corrections. (From the perspective of a retired U.S. Coast Guard marine engineer) A two-stroke diesel will always have a scavenge blower to clear the exhaust gasses from the cylinder. Typically a Roots-type blower directly driven by the engine, it has to be functioning for the engine to start up. (Noting that Roots-type blowers from General Motors X-71 series engines were repurposed as superchargers on gasoline engines, such as on drag racers.) The turbochargers are generally optional, and use the exhaust gasses to spin up a compression turbine to boost power. By quite a bit. Example: Fairbanks-Morse 38 D 8 1/8 common on large Coast Guard cutters of the '70s and '80s - 12 cylinder version, no turbocharger: 2,000 brake horsepower. Add two exhaust-driven turbochargers which kick in at about 600-700 rpm: 3,600 horsepower, and still a very reliable (although mechanically complex) engine. Reversing: Using gears to reverse the propeller for stopping or backing down is not feasible due to size and power constraints. Steam reciprocating engines and large diesel engines can be stopped, valve cams shifted, then started up in reverse getting full power to stop more efficiently. Steam turbines used a separate backing turbine which was considerably less powerful, so ships using them would take considerably longer to stop. Controllable pitch propellers can add reversing without changing the shaft rotation, but at the expense of complexity and cost. Gas turbines: The U.S. Navy uses gas turbines extensively on smaller combatants, up to about the level of "cruiser". A lot of power in a very small package, but at with a considerable penalty in fuel consumption. (The first Coast Guard cutter I was assigned to was a frigate-sized ship with both diesels (19 knots) and gas turbines (28 knots). Range: 10,000 miles on diesels, 3,000 miles on gas turbines. We almost never ran the gas turbines unless the Navy was paying for the fuel. The Maritime Administration funded an experimental gas turbine - powered merchant ship (I forget the name) but it never took hold. I boarded the ship for a safety inspection and the Chief Engineer told me that the controllable pitch mechanism had failed halfway through the first voyage and they had to reverse halfway across the Atlantic.

Great video

12:09 - The photo I see in Amazon without checking dimensions. 12:26 - The item I receive

damn, I unexpectedly learned so much

nice and interesting video! its fascinating at what massive scale at the global shipping industry works. I'm studying engineering with a focus on road vehicles and metrics like cost, efficiency, maintenance, and speeds are completely different. just one comment (IMHO) a thought the red line was a little bit less clear than in the previous videos.

This is pretty interesting stuff.

Interesting!

And thank you for debunking the myth that big vessels engines are polluting a lot. It's always easy to blame others

@ValentineC137

4 жыл бұрын

Where did he say that?

I understand something I don't understand something but one thing that i do is keep watching because it's f****ng interesting

awesome

Talking about a single screw propeller and showing double trails :D

Yay multifuel engines! With those we can meet alle the emission requirements while close to shore and still burn refinery waste once entering international waters (where no one can enforce emission requirements).

@useodyseeorbitchute9450

4 жыл бұрын

I still like more idea of increasing CO2 emission cost, so all its production would be moved to China and we would just consume imported goods, while entitled to smuggish behaviour.

@NowAndyPlays

4 жыл бұрын

I can tell you that in practice dualfuel engines have a tiny little problem while running on LNG, at lower loads unburnt methane gets shot up the funnel. methane is a lot worse for the environment than co2.

@bh_486

4 жыл бұрын

Heavy Fuel Oil is not refinery waste. These fuels need a lot of treatment on board the vessel: filtering, purifying and heating and pressurising so that they can be forced through the engine injectors.

@georgf9279

4 жыл бұрын

@@bh_486 Oh yeah. Lets find all the technicalities to distract from the real matter. Well played.

@bh_486

4 жыл бұрын

@@georgf9279 - You have lost me. What is the real matter?

You deserve so many more subscribers man, unbelievably interesting content man, love it

Great Engines

There was mention that maintenance of turbines is more demanding than diesel engines, if I correctly heard. I'm marine engineer, been on steam turbine propelled vessels, and on diesel propulsion, both merchant vessels (LNG and oil tankers). Turbines and turbo generators do not require any kind of maintenance, boiler just cleaning of fuel oil burners from time to time. Diesels are maintenance demanding. Diesel generators especially. Always adjusting valves, cleaning injectors, overhauling fuel oil pumps, overhauls of pistons, changing sump oil, cleaning filters, washing turbines. It's very dirty and physically demanding job.

Imagine nuclear cargo ships.

@theshuman100

4 жыл бұрын

imagine no more. the russians are putting their power plants on the water

@AKAtheA

4 жыл бұрын

@@theshuman100 more relevant would be that they have nuclear ice breakers...

@AKAtheA

4 жыл бұрын

yeah, imagine the "highly trained" crews operating said reactors...what could possibly go wrong...

@Fabrizio_Ruffo

4 жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing. Nuclear engine, electric drive.

@joshua43214

4 жыл бұрын

The small reactors used on ships require a higher grade of fuel. You will never see civilian ships powered by weapons grade uranium :) As for safety, so far the US navy has operated nukes for decades with no issues.

With the new IMO regulations a lot of deep sea ships are install g (or being built with scrubbers). The high end ones are ver good, and make heavy fuel oil clean (not dumping the bad stuff in the sea either). Have a look at Wärtsila on KZread. They have some great videos on different scrubbers!

Man.. the information you give and the way you present it is awesome. Thanks for your content!

Interesting.

I'm always so impressed with just how much people and the government was willing to invest into our nation and mega projects, infrastructure projects, all over the place and they just did it because that's what we should do and they were willing to take experimental risks to see if things would surprise them in useful beneficial functions. Like that company that developed the "Land Train" and "The Snow Freighter" it was so amazing and I love that project and the company's founder who came up with the ideas.

A large ship mechanic stated that they could replace the Piston rod without shutting the engine off supposedly they could isolate one cylinder and work on it , I have played with combustion engine since I was 7 years old and I cannot imagine how in hell they are able to do that and I have been a mechanic for 38 years , maybe I misunderstood ...maybe it is as you say... vessels with two engines... they could shut one engin down work on it while the second engin keeps propulsion going , if anyone have an idea if such thing could be possible please share with us .

Good video, but at 3.01 mentions that HP does most of the work, however, when engineer takes indicator cards, great efforts are taken to adjust valves so that each piston produces the same power. Also mention that compound/triple engines are far more heat efficient as they reduce the heat loss in each cylinderas hot steam comes in contact with cooler metal. If that metal is hotter (ie. at a higher average temperature), the heat loss is less and more steam pressure is there to push the piston.

It's 6 ads on your channel 🤕🤕👍 Excellent 😍 video

At 4:08 who in the hell is the monster shoveling coal!!!?? I know it's due to the long exposure, and him moving, but damn.

Diesel engines do not "require far less maintenance than steam engines". Of course steam ships have higher operating and fuel costs. Generally their maintenance costs get higher as they age. However, motor ships have higher maintenance costs from the start. Ask any marine engineer that has sailed both (me).

Commenting to give him more views

It's interesting how the 2 stroke dominates among both the smallest engines and the largest engines while the 4 strokes dominate in the mid range. However, a small engine 2 stroke is pretty different from these huge ones. A small 2 stroke does not need forced induction, or exhaust valves, the piston does all this. However, they do need oil mixed in to the fuel as the crank case is used to house the fuel air mixture before it's put in to the combustion chamber through transfer ports.

the cost of operating an electric drive on a ship is not 20% lower, but usually a little higher than a normal disel (2 energy changes less: mechanical - electric, electric - mechanical). The actual performance is influenced by the way the vessel is used (whether it usually sails along long, uninterrupted routes, or does a lot of maneuvering and requires a severe change in engine load). Large ships (with the exception of passenger ships) sail on long routes, so the electric drive will not replace the diesel quickly.

10:17 how is this different if it were used with dual crankshaft engine 8:48 with two less valvetrain, with direct drive, this would not reduce the complexity, or it can't do slow speeds?

Great video by the way, forgot to say that in my last comment about the poop.

For the steam engine now and 2020 you do not have to use cool but to heat the water you have generators and electric burners that can operate steam engines without Kohl's. And also now you even have frequency that ignite water with sound. Thank you for letting me share

Everyone should read more into open loop scrubbers. The Guradian has a piece on the impact of open loop scrubbers that you may consider reading. IBIA has a piece to counter The Guardian and other media. A search related to "maritime open loop scrubber installation" will lead to additional sources if you want. Educate yourselves.

I remember when LNG was merely transported across the ocean for on-land use. Flex-fuel engines are the future for a while.

I've found it interesting that we can get gas out of the ground. You drill down and there's a giant cave full of gas. I know how it's theorised to happen but it's weird when you think about it.

My old boat ohio class sub had a 8 1\8 inch 12 cyl 24 piston fairbanks & morris back up diesel. 800 rpm max. I miss running her.

Bruh am I the only one who laughed when the tiny boat photobombed that beautiful shot. 9:41

Oh yeah, I was wondering why 2 stroke engines can't be naturally aspirated. Is it because the exhaust needs to be blown out because it isn't being pushed out by the piston?

Last few hundred years has been about want and not need huh? Great video. Seems like u put alot of work into it. 👍

The first ship with a diesel engine was Danish Selandia 1912

Maybe a short video on bunker fuel, diesel #1 and #2?

i love motors

A global fuel sulphur cap has just been entered into force on January 1st, 0.5% by weight globally; EU ports, emission control areas capped at 0.1% by weight. Some ports uses drones to check the exhaust gases, a lot more work for the engineers to ensure a complete changeover from high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) to low sulphur fuel oil (LSFO).

how do you make these animations?

Fantastic Content. Hello from Ukraine.

The comment about the HP cylinder doing the most work at 3:03 is wrong. The work performed by each cylinder is the same because the area of each cylinder is carefully calculated to produce the same amount of "push" on its crank throw. The volume of expansion of the steam in the LP cylinder is the same as volume of expansion of a single expansion engine producing the same power at the same rpm. The staging of expansion produces advantages in thermal efficiency and mechanical operation.

I can imagine the Cat and the ladies in restaurant memes with the cat is Rudolf Diesel and 2 ladies is Thomas Newcoman and James Watt..

Could you please list your sources in the video description? It would make the verification process of the informations validity far more convenient.

You mention the fuel efficiency of these engines. How is it measured and what type of numbers do they produce. (E.G. 37% thermal efficiency or whatever)

Good video, but the first minute or so made me question if the video was really about marine engines.

@NewMind

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks, Warming up with some history is kind of my thing :)

NewMind is a man who knows alot about certain things. But we don't know anything about him. As much as I've learned: he knows about computers, flatness, engines of all sorts, fuel injection, roundness, quantum calculations. He doesn't know nor care that the earth orbits the sun. That would take up a piece of his brain that could better used to solve crimes

Well written and narrated, with excellent graphics. Congratulations on a fine production!

By most efficient engine ever...I'm assuming gallon per tonnage moved?

Nice video. I might have worded some things differently, but not bad. I sailed as an engineering officer, for context. The crosshead solves for many functions on two strokes, but yes the crosshead takes the side thrust that a no crosshead piston would require a large skirt to take. Also it allows for increased efficiency in that the straight up and down of the piston allows the piston to completely seal for underpiston supercharging, diminishing the need for a supercharger at high speeds.

cruise ships already us electric pods to propel them. 'symphony of the seas' as an example.

Error. You said two-strokes require artificial breathing.

Why do these never use external combustion engines? Aren't they more efficient?

The Rogers was the first container ship you say? Um, about that letter "M" on the containers you show. You don't think it might stand for Matson, as in Matson Lines, maybe?

12:20 that's how land ships (trains) operate. Diesel generators powering electric motors. I'm not sure why electric vehicles don't do this to give them longer range when needed (which would be like 1-3x a year for most families).

@Torchedini

4 жыл бұрын

chevy volt/opel ampera. But not great demand for it.

With plenty of seawater to act as a heatsink, they could use Sterling engines.

I love your videos. I wonder if you would be kind enough to give measurements in feet as well as meters, for those of us metrically impaired. I, for one, would be most grateful. 💕 Edit: I realize this video is now 4 years old.

Those expansion chambers are very creatively named. 😅

@NewMind

4 жыл бұрын

Chamber 1,2 and 3 were colorful alternatives.

This is one top grade channel. I'm sure it will soon make it in the same league and as popular as the "Real Engineering" channel

@alexanderkutschera149

2 жыл бұрын

It contains misinformation

if they are going to use lng id think they would use a gas turbine and the electric pod propeller