So Jeremy Clarkson was right: SPEED AND POWER

@metalspoon69

3 жыл бұрын

We need a sportstank!

@sparrow3439

3 жыл бұрын

I AM THE LORD OF HELLFIRE!

@banekrown9755

3 жыл бұрын

"Theres a simple scientific solution to ALL problems (Plants accelerator) SPEED"

@techhelpportal7778

3 жыл бұрын

Buffeting

@MrSimonw58

3 жыл бұрын

POWAAAR

Speed of war “blitzkreig noises”

@FreeRangeLemon

4 жыл бұрын

It’s crazy because war has only gotten faster

@cupcake-gameclip5129

4 жыл бұрын

with sponsor's today, the noise got cancelled

@TheGoodOne1998

3 жыл бұрын

Fast as the wind, the invasion has begun Shaking the ground with the force of thousand guns First in the line of fire First into hostile land Tanks leading the way Leading the way

@randomalien7746

3 жыл бұрын

HILARIOUS

@wolfsden6479

3 жыл бұрын

@Jose Raul Miguens Cruz Failure of a campaign doesn't mean a Failure of the doctrine.

1:32 to skip ad

@defencebangladesh4068

3 жыл бұрын

thank you

"i am speed" -Bmp probably

@tigerii10.5cmpog4

3 жыл бұрын

Me in my Experimental AA with a Panther hull - I am Inevitable

@muffy469

3 жыл бұрын

@A P It's key advantage is that it floats on water and can easily cross rivers and bodies of water. Meanwhile tanks and other vehicles have to wait for a field bridge to be constructed or a boat to arrive.

@alvininfinger5596

3 жыл бұрын

Actually it was lighting McEwen

@alexanderrose1556

3 жыл бұрын

@A P a BMP is still one of the easiest things to destroy tho, its value in a modern day conventional war is gonna be very high.

@defencebangladesh4068

3 жыл бұрын

@@muffy469 yep

2:26 speed and mobility. And meth. Can't forget the meth.

@trumanhw

3 жыл бұрын

My USMC friends would have killed for some Meth after being kept awake for days on end as they entered Fallujah. It's literal cruelty ... BUT, if you're not going to crash a 30 - 80 million dollar vehicle ... the military will uphold it's propaganda that they don't do drugs.

@djsickbeatz4005

3 жыл бұрын

He technically did mention speed

I remember a scene in the movie "Jarhead" about the First Gulf War. in which a US Marine tell his squadmates that infantry like them would probably not be able to shoot at the enemy before the war ends since in a conventional modern war between two armies, what really matters are the Air Force and Cruise Missiles lmao

@PhazonSouffle

4 жыл бұрын

'I never shot my rifle'

@GuderII

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I remember the scene that those team sniper wanna take out Iraqi commander at tower their airbase, but before that happens Air force bomb that location and eradicated all high-value target . kzread.info/dash/bejne/f5l5qLyCZ7DAaZs.html *shock an awe*

@jesusdeloera1921

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah but in a conflict with a near peer adversary like Russia or China that will not be the case especially with China..Iraq is mostly all flat and the cities are not that big but in Asia China's back yard would be way different they have a lot of huge cities with skyscrapers and huge populations just like Israel found out in 2006 all that air power doesn't mean shit in densely populated cities like that you would still need lot's of people to take land and go from City block to block building to building Room to Room and in a war like that with debris from skyscrapers buildings already hit would make for a lot of hiding places and would make The battle of stalling grad look like a Puny battle the world has never seen the horrors that such a war would bring we would not just be fighting in China and they have a population of 1.4 billion but N.Korea,South Korea and even though some of this country's are our allies they would have people that would be on China's side If history has taught us anything is that not all citizens of a country are happy with their government for some reason or another so they help the people fighting it Philippines,Vietnam,Thailand,Indonesia..such a war will make WW2 LOOK LIKE A SKIRMISH!!

@buzz-es

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, and I remember that the Army and Marine Generals were pissed at the Air Force for not leaving them enough Iraqi forces to fight. They made them stop bombing so that they could get a full 36 hours of fighting before the cease fire.

@dfinlen

3 жыл бұрын

If your fighting a war of invasion you'd better be prepared for couterinsurgency. Holding land can be costly unless you are ruthless. But again first to act wins. insurgents can just walk up as a civi and kill you if their desperate. 1 civi to 1 highly trained soldier ain't bad. That's why you get locals to police and don't expose your bad ass shit to civis.

So how long before the 75th Ranger Regiment is training on reentry procedures and hypersonic flight? I'm not saying it's practical. I just wanna watch.

@joedollarbiden9823

3 жыл бұрын

What did I miss?

@jodecisanchez8785

3 жыл бұрын

When Elon cooks up how to turn those self landing rockets into droppods, all bets are off.

@patrickkenyon2326

3 жыл бұрын

Wait till Space Force designs a paratrooper carrier for HALO.

@nathanielbixby5733

3 жыл бұрын

“We are dropping into Hell troopers! Time to grow a pair!”- GYSGT Edward Buck

@michaelsoland3293

3 жыл бұрын

ODSTs for the W

A huge part of Napoleon's success as a general was the greater speed of his troops.

@armatacalanca962

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed!

The speed of war, only movements per turn, because Civilization devs don't know what they're doing.

@1202388

3 жыл бұрын

beyond the sword was the best one

@Yenlag

3 жыл бұрын

I'm Speeeeeeed!!!

@colin-campbell

3 жыл бұрын

The references to Sun Tzu are getting ridiculous. The guy wrote about warfare hundreds of years ago, not relevant today.

@cortster12

3 жыл бұрын

@@colin-campbell Technically not true. Many aspects are just as relevant today, you just have to pay attention for the outdated stuff.

@evelynfarfellwooosh1219

3 жыл бұрын

@@colin-campbell Your comment shows that you didn’t even read it.

Speed and information and Logistics The three most important elements in any war Master it and you become master of war

@smokanmiraz6942

3 жыл бұрын

Got my sneakers, phone and sammiches. I am War Master!!!!!

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

3 жыл бұрын

Smokan Miraz... In the most fundamental sense.. you're correct. It's just a matter of how long can you keep it up that sets your War Master ranking.

@renard6012

3 жыл бұрын

Information: Know your enemy and know yourself. Speed: End the war quickly. Logistics: Make sure that you can afford not ending the war quickly.

@QualityPen

2 жыл бұрын

@@renard6012 Speed is more about maximizing your advantages and keeping the enemy reacting to you and protecting himself rather than hitting you where it hurts. Speed lets you concentrate your forces where the enemy is weaker and outrun him where is is stronger. Speed lets you hit the enemy before he is ready. Speed lets you confuse the enemy by outpacing his ability to gather information on you. Speed lets you engage before the enemy can even form a plan. And, yes, speed can let you minimize logistical difficulties and morale drain if you win quickly. That’s why it’s better to have 10 men now than 10,000 later.

In any major future conflict cyber warfare will be the fastest means of attack, and not on the small scale that happens somewhat regularly. Power grids, computer systems, major infrastructure, and even space assets will almost immediately come under attack. With good enough cyber strikes, massive disruption, economic chaos, and civil unrest can be unleashed before the first weapons are actually fired. Imagine trying to fight a war when your trains are not running, your roads are clogged with hundreds of thousands of collisions because every traffic light suddenly went green, every plane in your airspace is receiving conflicting information, and your people that still have power are being fed expertly made deepfake government announcements of a coup in progress. That's just for starters on day one.

@Aaron-wq3jz

3 жыл бұрын

Yea people forget about that, i hope the military doesnt

@Sedna063

3 жыл бұрын

Cyber warfare is also the cheapest warfare. And the most efficient. Imagine what you could do if you hack a hospital

@That_Awesome_Guy1

3 жыл бұрын

@@Aaron-wq3jz You think the military doesn't think if that? There is no way the don't.

@macdom24

3 жыл бұрын

If we were willing to accept losses of inconvenience (and money) we could massively increase security in our networks... i.e. physical/air gaps, less overall connectivity, etc.

@Aaron-wq3jz

3 жыл бұрын

@@macdom24 that's why I keep money out of banks and online money transfer services like paypal

"I feel the need! The need for speed!"

“Speed of war” Bugatti gets ptsd again.

@deusexaethera

3 жыл бұрын

Huh?

@josephbargo5024

3 жыл бұрын

Shawn Elliott Ze Germans

@whiskeyactual.

3 жыл бұрын

Bugatti is a German owned company.., I don't get it.

@lysergicaciddiethylamide6127

3 жыл бұрын

Their factory was bombed “get up to speed”.

@ShahjahanMasood

3 жыл бұрын

@@lysergicaciddiethylamide6127 that was low man

If Wagame red dragon is to be believed, the next conventional conflict consists of columns of jumbled vehicles screaming down highways at 70 mph at each other

@ethan20559

3 жыл бұрын

Only to have them popped by a squad of recon infantry w 80mms 😤

@piotrgrzelak2613

3 жыл бұрын

I once saw a calculation that in an event of a cold war conflict in Europe both sides could deploy enough tanks to put one every few dozen or hundred meters of the entire German border, can't remember which. The supply and reinforcement would create a traffic jam that extends beyond borders of Germany both from the west and east.

@hyperhektor7733

3 жыл бұрын

nah they use electric cars/tanks , after the internal communists take over xD (liberals,antifa/soros(clinton/bill gay)

@ethan20559

3 жыл бұрын

@@hyperhektor7733 who asked

@metanumia

3 жыл бұрын

@@hyperhektor7733 Quit spreading misinformation, you can't lump together all of those distinct groups, falsely label them "communists" and lie about them somehow working together secretly to "take over". Liberals are a diverse group of people, but most simply want the greediest and richest people to actually pay a fair share of taxes in order to allow the poorest individuals to find good work and enter a more populous middle class that has affordable access to good healthcare, medicine, transportation and education. Then there's "ANTIFA", which is not an organized group and has no command structure or even matching goals or ideals, they're simply people who are morally against fascism, dictators, totalitarianism, and racism. A very tiny, tiny percentage of people identifying as "ANTIFA" are just fringe extremists who are misguided and think breaking store windows will somehow help their cause, the number of those types is only in the hundreds or low thousands throughout the entire USA. Now, on to Soros, Clinton, and Bill Gates, none of these people are "communists" in any way, in fact they're all three the exact opposite of communists, they are successful capitalists who've made millions of dollars by creating successful products (Bill Gates), investing (Soros), or selling books and giving talks after being a successful political leader (Clinton). All three are absolutely card-carrying capitalists, and all of them firmly believe and fight for democracy, liberty, civil rights, and sensibly-regulated free markets. Bill Clinton and Bill Gates are also very prominent and successful philanthropists who have collectively saved thousands of lives around the globe and raised many millions for charities that provide free healthcare, disease-prevention, and quality education to the poorest and most vulnerable civilians on the planet. You do have a point about electric vehicles likely replacing internal combustion engine-powered vehicles in not just the civilian markets but also in militaries around the world due to their increasingly advantageous power and advanced capabilities while being non-polluted and thus not contributing to the catastrophic destruction of the global climate that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are causing as well as sea level rise due to global warming from those greenhouse gases, which has already started displacing people who live near oceans and on islands. So, why would anyone have a problem with any of these people, exactly?

Speaking of supply lines when I was in iraq I read a magazine the the military makes for service members and the an average gallon of gas in a combat theatre costs up to $100 a gallon by the time it’s used because it’s a big target and needs a lot security

Remember when Covert Cabal used to have a PPE sponsor, long before the pandemic started?

An excellent book on this subject is: *Fighting By Minutes: Time and The Art of War by Lieutenant Colonel Robert R. Leonhard.* Some great insights, historical examples, and their effect on modern doctrine.

@cliftons6811

4 жыл бұрын

Will check this out

@tandradey9050

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks

@massimechoub3343

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks 👌

@Agonis100

3 жыл бұрын

@Clifton Sutherland @Tandra Dey @massi mechoub - No problem! 😄

@josephg.3370

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you

gotta go fast

Appear weak when you are strong and strong when you are weak - sun tzu This quotes are used in the 7 month long war called “ The Great Potatoe War ”

This reminded me. iirc the balakot strike lasted about 20 minutes and operation swift retort lasted about 50 minutes. Great example of the speed of modern combat since it happened just last year.

US: oh we need to strengthen our readiness covid 19:NOT SO FAST

@intensity67

3 жыл бұрын

more like the ccp virus not really the covid19 xD

@person6539

3 жыл бұрын

@@intensity67 whats that ?

@person6539

3 жыл бұрын

@@intensity67 also covid will effect the economy and china will probably over take us.

@AnthonySenpaikun

3 жыл бұрын

@@person6539 You must've been fed a lot of their propaganda to believe that they're completely fine even when the plague is raging in their borders in which they censor a lot about.

@alreadyblack3341

3 жыл бұрын

@@person6539 Weird how they have it contained, but see massive outbreaks in Beijing and Hubei province. Weird, I thought they had it under control?

"War has changed" - Solid Snake

5:53 "...naval ships at sea..." Yes, the floor here is made out of floor

@lupahole

3 жыл бұрын

Here is something you probably didnt know, death is the nations number one killer.

@CaesarCassius

3 жыл бұрын

This sentence is false

@mpc7440

3 жыл бұрын

naval ships can also be docked my guy, a lot of ships in the navy are in the docks atm

@megatronusv2215

3 жыл бұрын

Unrelated but a space fleet is also called a navy

@justADeni

3 жыл бұрын

@@mpc7440 1. He wouldn't talk about ships in dock, because that doesn't make any sense in given context. It is already implied that there are ships at sea 2. Either use naval, or at sea in one sentence, if you're using both you're restating already given information

If US can reach anywhere on earth within the hour. Why didn't it reach Benghazi Consulate in 2012.

@chadthundercock4982

3 жыл бұрын

He said we are trying to reach anywhere within an hour. not that we actually can. also that was 2012 this is now.

@magatism

3 жыл бұрын

@@chadthundercock4982 OK, how does 24 hour sound.

6:44 looks like these guys have great chef onboard

The second most important thing after speed of attack is deterrence to any would be first attackers. This is why penal or vengeance attacks are still employed against secondary targets and civilians who feed and keep the war machine running.

How fast is war? The answer: yes.

I'd love to see a video about chemical and biological weapons, you don't cover topics that will be irrelevant within months but the topic is very broad

Make a video on the India-China border conflict.

@Archangelm127

4 жыл бұрын

I think Caspian Report has at least one video on this topic. His angle is geopolitics rather than pure military, but he's a great resource. :)

@noway57

4 жыл бұрын

The battle on the mountain. Rock throwing and kicking them down it

@sumanchatterjee6591

3 жыл бұрын

Wait it is yet to become a conflict

@sumanchatterjee6591

3 жыл бұрын

@@noway57 so mr. Smart ass u want bullets flying between to nuclear nations?

@whiskeyactual.

3 жыл бұрын

@@Archangelm127 I found Caspian to be pretty biased.., on the middle east conflicts at least. I prefer Cabal, he at least seems to be objective and does not disregard major factors to portray a one sided narrative.

Cyberwarfare happens in seconds... China attacking Australia recently and caught with pants down...

@honkhonk8009

3 жыл бұрын

yet the australian government is all buddies with China for some dumbass reason. China genuinely needs to have its trade just deadass cut.

the Nazi's thought the term 'Blitzkrieg' was foolish.. coined by the British*

@Laotzu.Goldbug

3 жыл бұрын

Correct. "Blitzkrieg" was never really a term used by the German military, and more a trope that we apply after the fact from third-party analysis. MHV has a very good video on the term: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fneC2ZSeXb3LmNo.html

TY for all your hard work and content contributions.

war has already reached the speed of light with the introduction of laser cannons that can cut planes in half.

Yet another informative video on this topic. The speed of modern warfare is truly staggering to contemplate.

Thanks for the video👍👍

Thank you for the video. Great analysis and entertaining.

Watching your videos makes me feel alive..

I love this channel, I could watch your videos all day, I just wish sometimes they were longer but then again I guess it's best they aren't cause I got things to do and I could easily get bogged down binge watching videos

From the title I was expecting some Speed of Sound mashup meme video. Then I saw Covert Cabal.

Speed is not the only thing it is just every thing. Not just in war but on the street 👊🏿

Great video and writing, always getting better!

I believe in peace, peace through nuclear deterrence, not the peace we like to have, but the peace we deserve.

@alfijibril611

4 жыл бұрын

Sadly an unpopular opinion... Most people would rather let tens of millions more dead allied soldiers and probably the destruction of the japanese people and culture as a whole rather than Hiroshima And Nagasaki get nuked lol

@shmeckle666

4 жыл бұрын

@@alfijibril611 the atomic bombings was not necessary and the generals in charge of US Pacific forces agreed. It was strictly used as a political tool--domestic politics and for the USSR. The invasion of the japanese homelands was jnecessary as well, with or without the atomic bombings.

@klm2639

3 жыл бұрын

Every country should have nukes, that mutually assured destruction will lead to more diplomacy and less fighting

@gabrielcaballero4817

3 жыл бұрын

Peace through nuclear Holocaust!

@TonboIV

3 жыл бұрын

That doesn't work long term. Someone will screw up eventually if we keep this up long enough. We need for the largest nuclear powers to mutually reduce their arsenals. Total nuclear disarmament isn't realistic right now, but there's no need for the huge arsenals of the largest powers for effective deterrence. We're also in a very different situation than in the 1940s. The world is much more connected now in terms of trade and information, to the point that any of the wealthiest countries would lose far more than they'd gain in any war with another powerful country.

Great video as always

Excellent content as always.

The term blitzkrieg was originally used by the british in media to explain the results of the German military victories in Europe--the germans liked it and used it before the British using this term, the term had only been mentioned about two times in German military literature.. Technically, the invasion of France, the low countries, etc., where not examples of blitzkrieg. Blitzkrieg was only truly, somewhat, utilized and realized in the invasion of the USSR.

"Supply chains" "And today ladies and gentlemen we shall be supplying our troops with ICBMs." -Nobody, ever

Great video

I’ve been reading articles on post-stealth aircraft possible future, make a video based on that please !

3:29 I think that planet is Kepler-22b. It's good to see we are planning ahead.

Love this channel

Outstanding content 👌

Love ur content 🥰

I love your videos seriously, a lot of the times I know a lot of the information/ ideas you are giving but I always manage to learn something new. Also can you please do a video regarding Russian (slow) expansion of its Air Force and what capabilities the are focusing on, Egyptian expansion to their armed forces especially the navy (especially related to current event in Libya, Turkey or even Ethiopian damn ) and lastly the chinies potential innovation of Taiwan (I am saying this because of the recent deployments and exercises they have done near the taiwanies and how they are not tolerating places like honking and Taiwan anymore). These are just some ideas I have been thinking of that would be very interesting to see your view on. Many thank for all of your work, keep it up.

Never missed a Covert Cabal video

7:31 this is old stuff. 9:49 winning battles, but not caring about the outcome of the war has worked out pretty good.

A video suggestion, or video series, for future military spending regarding some countries and what it means i.e. What is the UK planning to spend on their military for the future, what it means strategically and geopolitically, and why they're doing it.

@imrekalman9044

3 жыл бұрын

Why? Mostly because the weapon manufacturers like to make money. :(

Imagine if all that effort would go into space exploration/travel... we would be much more advanced

Mobility and persistence...

Love your videos ❤️❤️❤️

There are four types of speed to differentiate between. Speed of information (sensor to shooter) speed of logistics the speed of hardware and the fourth is speed of munitions

Hey man, ur videos r great.One can learn a lot.U r not naive & biased.Pls make a video about the current south China sea situation.Thanks.

Should use these in Seattle

Covert: **says if you win a battle doesnt mean you'll win the war** Stalingrad: allow me to introduce myself

Make a video about the history and cool facts about the tomahawk missile! Thanks

Really impresses me that this channel manages to discuss defence, security and geopolitics whilst remaining relative apolitical. Much better than the other flag-waving, anthem-singing, anti-intellectual shit you see scattered around KZread. Great work, keep it up!

@neeneko

3 жыл бұрын

yeah, the lack of jingoism while still being brief really makes this channel stand out.

Gotta go Extraterrestrial fast.

@noway57

4 жыл бұрын

I am not saying ufos but, UFOs

Blitzkrieg was a name coined by the allied press, the German doctrine was Bewegungskrieg, war of movement. It was a combined attack using tanks break through, encircle and then use infantry to crush. They did this time and told again. Really blitzkrieg was (this is just my opinion) an organic development from the German army's predisposition to action when in doubt. This is particularly the case after passing the ardienne and ignoring Hitler's order to regroup and pressing forward.

Bro, can you please make a video about the Mountain Warfare? What is the best, fastest option to capture a region that has a mountainous terrain

Liked it just because the title is so on point.

Like from spaceballs “LUDICROUS SPEED”

Even though it could take months for the US to fully mobilize forces, we have entire regiments of marines on LHA’s who can be on the ground anywhere in the world within a day or two, as well as carrier groups to support them.

@Covert Cabal Any chance you could do a speculative video on the TR-3B? The last Joe Rogan / Mike Baker interview might give you some additional hints.

SPEEEEED IS KEYYYYYY

Re: space launches delayed by weather. Yes although that's mostly because it is in fact peacetime. Look at a solid fueled ICBM for an example of a space launch rocket that CAN launch to a damn near stable orbit on a moment's notice from just about anywhere.

The quest for speed in war is actually the deterrent. Every major increase in speed comes with an exponential increase in cost, in money or importance of the unit. Therefore everyone is too scared to deploy these units, items, weapons, etc. The thing that will drive the world to peace, is not because we all love each other, its because it will be too expensive to outright win a fight. If you cant just win with minimal losses, you won't take that fight. This is why we haven't had a nuclear war, the cost is so high, that it doesn't matter. Conventional war is getting to the same end point, its just too expensive to wage war. It is however extremely cheap to sign a trade agreement and exchange McDonald's cheeseburgers for cash.

We let the entire add play out for covert videos

You know its a good one once this music starts playing lmao

Seems like looking up Satellite orbits would not matter if the nation in question has enough satellites that they overlap their coverage around the entire globe.

Blitzkrieg: HAPPENS Blitzkrieg noises: Erika, Erika!

Space launches can be done in terrible weather if the rocket is designed for it. Soyuz can launch in blizzards for example see TMA-22 if interested. I believe the US could launch military satellites if necessary in bad weather just like Soyuz can be

I hoped for more on the speed in terms of anti artillery/radar and missile technology etc. I feel there could be huge disruptions, in being able to automatically respond to individual traditional attacks with missiles, artillery, aircraft. Simulations were extremely interesting here.

Please talk about pantsier air defence failure in libya against drones and which country Turkey or Russia have strategic advantage ....Turkey drones VS Russian air defences

9:33 RIGGER!!!

Can you link to the soundtrack or post it separately? I love this music. Thanks.

Blitzkrieg was a term coined by the British news reporters after the fall of france to try to make sense of frances swift defeat

you should discuss mosaic warfare

Violence, speed, momentum...

This is a double edged sword. The sheer speed of modern weapons is cutting into decision makers window to think rationally.

Way to make the SpaceX example Zuma ;) Schrodinger's satellite

I've actually wondered how cruise missiles and satellites would do against navies in modern times. Last time there was a major war that featured missiles and ships was the Falklands, where satellites were not involved. As said in the video, the satellites would probably be shot down and major gaps would develop in naval strike capability, but exactly how useful those gaps would be is the question.

Don't forget GPS spoofing with satellites. It's possible to spoof the location of an entire unit or fleet.

Satellite radar systems are only useful in peace time or low intensity. Electronic countermeasures aren't expensive or difficult to mount.

Smaller countries, given enough money, can certainly take opportunity of this to be more powerful than they could have been before. A few high-tech units and special ops, a lot of hackers for cyberattacks, and you can be a real threat to any bigger countries.

the -art- speed of war

"The only thing faster than light is death"

Still one of the first last vid was the first to watch that's speed

One interesting option would be to have a satellite with some highly efficient propulsion method and a decent, but not necessarilly all that high TWR that can adjust its apoapsis and periapsis and complete large plane changes in a highly eccentric elliptical orbit for microscopic amounts of fuel. Thus, in order to know where it is or where it will be next, you need to actively track the thing. Of course, this comes with the disadvantage that there would be days or even weeks between close passes, and the moon may provide inconvenient interference, but it has the significant advantage of being able to be anywhere at some date in the future, and come from any angle, and only people who are actively tracking the thing will know where it is. Another advantage of this style of orbit is that a KKV in such an orbit could intercept both low orbit satellites and communications sattelites. And the main vehicle could deposit such KKVs designed to be stealthy to radar and infrared for later use.

Make a video on the China - Taiwan issue.

I think a big thing you didn't mention is cyber warfare, which while the development of very advanced programs like Stuxnet takes years, if you think of it like a weapon, it can do damage extremely quickly.

Also would you be doing a counterinsurgency video?