Your vids are so high-quality. I have no idea how you’re not more popular

@Blub3rs

2 жыл бұрын

Agred

@trebory6

2 жыл бұрын

I mean, the niche this channel is trying to fill is basically already filled by Kurzgesagt, and the videos are already similar. They need to find a sub-niche or separate themselves from the similarities, otherwise they'll keep being seen as the knockoff of Kurzgesagt unfortunately. I do like how much shorter the videos are though.

@jasonkelley6185

2 жыл бұрын

Because they are just repeating what others have done, but not as well.

@davidmkhitaryan7690

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasonkelley6185 Yes! They don't have animation & design identity, they just copy Kurzgesagt but very very poorly. The quality is a bit better than the something like "the infographic show" channel, and they target same market/viewers. If this channel was a tech brand it would be xiaomi.

@Dimaz42

2 жыл бұрын

yea, I don't see why this channel couldn't compete with similar channels like Kurzgesagt, coz it's not like you have to pay to watch and sub to both.. though I think this channel needs more contents to increase the subscribers count

It's like Kurzgesagt had a brother. This quality is beyond my expectations!

@subzerosugar7161

2 жыл бұрын

do they have the same thumbnail artist as Kurzgesagt? they look so similar

@forhadrh

6 ай бұрын

this type of art is called flat illustration, it's not something only present in Kurzgasagt, hope it helps @@subzerosugar7161

By year 2023, this channel will have well over 3 million subscribers, that is, if this channel keeps putting out quality videos like these!! Kudos to whoever is behind Perception!!

@Mr.Maravilla

2 жыл бұрын

I am a Spanish speaker and the truth is that this type of video is almost not found in Spanish. Currently there are very few English channels that are dedicated to dubbing their content into Spanish and those that do generally end up with the support of this specific audience. If you want to have fast and secure growth, you already know what strategy to use.

@context880

2 жыл бұрын

Not if he keeps getting things wrong. Perception seems to be about 90% fact and 10% misconception purported as fact. Take 3:15 for example; it takes four hydrogen to make each helium atom, not two.

@wilburdesouza

2 жыл бұрын

@@context880 Thanks for pointing that out. I'm sure every KZreadr makes some errors here and there, especially when starting out as one might not have the resources to fact check the entire script before the video is made. I want to know is it really a 10% rate of error or is that a rough estimate?.. I think you should do fact check on all their videos and see how accurate they actually are.

@context880

2 жыл бұрын

@@wilburdesouza Oof. I apologize if pointing out a basic inaccuracy in the video is offending you. But I'm fairly certain you'll be ok.

@wilburdesouza

2 жыл бұрын

@@context880 ​ @Context Lol offended? I'm not offended at all. I'm actually curious about how many errors this channel and others actually make, I mean it would be cool to have a website that actually rates educational youtube channels based on accuracy of information. Kind of like a mix between imdb and snopes but for youtube. I'm not good at chemistry so I wouldn't even be able to tell he was making an error there. But since you said it's 90% fact I wanted to know if that is based on a true count of all facts presented or not. Because if this video has 10% of misconceptions purported as fact, that means 1 in 10 facts are wrong, which is pretty high. Knowing how reliable or accurate that 10% estimate actually means a lot. That's why we have confidence intervals in statistics.

My one issues with this is that the bullet traveling through the air still has the powder casing on it. haha

PLS NEVER STOP UPLOADING

Can't wait till this channel blows up! The animations are incredible, will be able to say I've been here since 20k!

Really enjoying the content on your channel! Would love to see more math-related content, I think your quality graphic work goes a long way in explaining concepts for those of us who find it otherwise challenging to understand.

Man, just phenomenal. Keep producing, this channel will blow! Just wait and see

This is the best explanation I have seen! Other videos delve into such a lot of uneccessary info. This one is it. You understand that not everyone knows the exact meaning of the terminology and tackle that rather than the history behind the discovery of the formula. Thank you!

such an quality from a SUPER UNDERRATED CHANNEL never expected keep doing and u will shine soon

Posted your channel on science reddits so more people can find this channel. Hope you get the subs you deserve

Subscribed !!.. I read many comments talking about this channel and '...in a nutshell' channel ...but it doesn't matter in from of quality content !!

Great video - thanks! I am super happy to have found your channel - the videos you create are concise, informative and really well-made (The JWST one is just fabulous)! I hope you will grow exponentially, because, as many before me said, it is truly deserved. If I might make a small suggestion: It would be great if you could maybe consider creating another version of your logo (for intro/outro) in darker colours, because it can be painful to watch it in darker conditions. It's really a minor thing, but maybe you could give it a thought :) Also I have a small doubt concerning this video - shouldn't the units at 2:37 be MPH^2 rather than MPH? (or you could omit them altogether) Anyway - thank you again for your content and keep up the great work!

@thewardoctor3127

2 жыл бұрын

The speed of light was squared to get that value in MPH rather than MPH^2

I was seriously struggling to understand the equation and you saved my day! I have read many articles and watched a couple KZread videos, but none of them made me understand the equation as well as you did.

Did not even realize the chennel hasn't blown up yet. Came for the content 100%. Congrats to the team behind this channel, i reallly enjoyed the video and will definitly subscribe.

Please 🙏 use SI units for international audience. I am a big fan of your channel.

Is this channel shadow-banned or something? All of these videos should be in the million views range

Amazing content, please keep making videos! Can't wait til the next one.

This channel is so underrated

Great content, you deserve a million views.

Fantastic work as always!

I've considered this equation most of my adult life. For the first time, your explanation finally succeeded in helping me truly understand!

I’m a new happy subber. I love your perspectives, dark as it may be!

Making my mark here, a little under 25k subs, Hoping to see you at 500k within next year!

How on Earth don't you guys have 1 million subscribers is beyond me. Amazing videos

Keep doing this and your channel is going to explode with subscribers

How come you only have 28 thousand subscribers?? The quality is top-notch, you should definitely try to make collaborations with more popular channels so that other people can discover this excellence!

Great watch! I subbed!

Wow, amazingly well explained and top quality animation. Thank you!

Loved your channel. A Sugestion: Use SI units (imperial may be a sidenote)... i mean, we are talking about science, yes?

only 13k views?!?! Cmon man, this lad deserves better

Really happy after seeing this video...Great content 🙌

I need more!!! Thanks for giving us top quality videos

Keep up the good work!

You deserve way more subs

How the hell you hv this tiny amount of subscribers...this extreme quality content deserves more light...

I am your new subscriber Your video quality is as good as kurzgesagt

Awesome channel! About time I found another channel with the same quality as Kurzgesagt.

The vids here are really nice!

Hello kurzgesagt Jr, it's nice to meet you. I have subscribed, please keep making videos

I admired the creativity. Keep it up

What a rollercoaster ride...this video touched on so many concepts of physics without really explaining any of them.

Oh, Lord.Your videos are as beautiful as Kurzgesagt's. That is a complement; do not feel underrated, please.

Is there a way to contact you? I think I could contribute to this channel, you allow me...

Understanding that beautiful equation is freedom

Nicely Done 👍

Finding this channel feels like accidentally digging gold.

wow a channel like Kurzgesagt i love it :) keep more topics coming, we will support you.

this channel surely have million of subscribers soon

While explaining e=mc^2 you animate the entire cartridge and call it a bullet. Genius.

Nice videos. I hope u will make more interesting videos like this🙂.

You deserve a subscribe

2:40 it should be M^2PH^2 (miles squared per hour squared) because square a speed square it’s unit.

Could there be a geometrical aspect to Einstein’s equation, E=MC² energy equals mass times the speed of light squared? The C squared can represent light radiating out in every direction forming a sphere 4πr². We have square the radius r² of the sphere because the process is relative to the spherical surface. The interior of the sphere is naturally three-dimensional forming the three dimensions of our everyday life. If we place the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π between the energy ∆E and mass ∆M we link time within the process. The surface of the sphere can form a boundary condition or manifold for the process of energy exchange that forms our ever-changing world. We measure this process as a ‘period of time’ with the atoms of the periodic table being standing waves in time. The spontaneous absorption and emission of light photon ∆E=hf energy is forming potential photon energy into the kinetic energy of electrons. Kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy is the energy of what is actually happening. An uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future is continuously coming into existence with the exchange of photon energy.

Can you do a video about why the electromagnetic spectrum i.e. light, is named for electromagnetism? Where are magnets and light connected?

1. Einstein asked: “Does the inertia of a body depend on the energy content in it?” and answered that the inertial motion of quantum particles (such as light quanta - photons), depends on E=mc^2. Even light quanta with a constant and direct speed (c) require energy E=mc^2 to move. 2. Einstein's E=mc^2 was corrected by Dirac as E=±MC².

Excellent narration and very well explained. My question to you is why C squared? Why is it C and why is it squared? Thank you,

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

kinetic energy is reciprocal. c is constant, as is mass in its rest frame

I’m here before this channel explodes :D

I know this Channel will blow up soon and when it does, remember me and say hi

It's good that you can see the world around you and understand it using science meanwhile many people still beleive in bronze age idea of a supernatural being controlling all this according to its own will

that's a great video

seems like KZread is now reccomending your video! under 20k gang

Lately I have seen the e= mc2 equation has changed...there's now a little tiny pyramid following the c...cannot remember IF it was pointing up or down...CONE SHAPED (..just two slant lines...) not sure what it's suppose to represent??

Better presentation than Kurgesagt! But unfortunately too similar to stand out. Facts in Motion was imo a true benchmark for quality but sadly stopped uploading.

you kurzgesagt's younger bro !!!

VERY COOL

Very cool...

I enjoy your videos but please organize your source documents so that it can be analyzed easily

C2 in E=MC2 is c=1 (1×1=1) C2=1 as in 1 speed of light units.

Are you both the animator and the narrator?

Nailed it 😎

Or in laymans terms, energy creates mass at the frequency you vibrate, the energy used is equal to the mass it manifests into. Positive energy creates good things and negative engery creates bad things.

Great video, though raises many questions. For example what makes mass so fundamental? Surely attractive forces and types of atoms and types of structures should impact the energy as we see in observations? For example every material is different, so the energy extractable from 1kg of water would be less than from 1kg of uranium. Surely there is some dependence on type of atomic structure and strength of bonding of the particles. I know Einstein was a genius so must be right but it makes no sense ! Think about the particles bonds, there are so many different structures, the energies can't simply be down to just mass. But force of bonding does not come into the equation at all. Why not ? To release energy from a mass you need to break down the bonds. I would get it if energy was a function of the fundamental forces holding particles together and c but only mass ?

This is excellent content, however, a bullet that has been fired won't have its casing on it. Might I suggest if you do an edit somewhere down the line, an arrow, and an arrow that has been fired?

@floris_fireball6587

2 жыл бұрын

or a bullet without it's casing

The first 20 seconds of the video is not correct and misleading. The stationary and the traveling bullet have the same mass. The formula E=mc^2 is used for stationary objects. The full formula is E=γmc^2 where γ is the Lorentz factor (even this is not the most complete version of the formula). Lorentz factor is 1 for stationary objects, thus you get E=mc^2. When the bullet is traveling, its energy increases, but the mass remains the same. The lorentz factor is what describes how much the energy of the bullet increases when it is traveling. I mean, you even describe in the video that WE are also moving through space even when we think we are stationary, because the earth is orbiting the sun, and the sun is orbiting the milky way's central black hole. That would mean any change in velocity during the earth and the suns orbit would result in a change in mass for you and me, and everything else! Anybody interested in a more detailed explanation can watch this: kzread.info/dash/bejne/l4N3rbCBYN3HmNI.html

Who is behind this channel? Surely somebody has to be funding this

Why does the bullet still have the casing after it was shot?

Math is not physics. Mass is a property of matter and energy. This equation is just the conversion factor which gives the mass of a quantity of energy. A property is not the equivalent of the thing of which it is a property. Redness is not equivalent to an apple. Mass is always conserved.

E = mc2 comes in two parts. If we admit that a body has a rest energy of mc2, then we can put together a well-defined energy-momentum 4-vector which transforms consistently under a Lorentz transformation. It does not follow from this that the rest energy is anything but a formal device to get a 4-vector. However there are physical processes such as radioactivity and sunshine which are obviously much more energetic than any chemical process. We can then guess that there exist processes where even the rest energy is converted into other forms such as electromagnetic radiation which correspond to a more traditional view of energy. We can now do experiments which duplicate processes in the Sun, and it becomes steadily more evident that the conversion of rest mass into traditional energy is a fact.

@C-man553

Ай бұрын

Well said

imagine coverting a entire planet into energy i wonder how much energy we would get

@Mysoi123

Жыл бұрын

In fact, if convert the entire sun’s mass into energy, that amount of energy is equivalent to a gamma ray burst!

The simplest equation and the hardest to fully understand. Mr. X

Our physics teacher always told us that people mistake mass for weight while two are very different

I have the feeling tous Channel os about to explode, mark my words

So my energy is dependent upon the mass of my body and the differential between the two observed states of rest and motion, as observed by the speed of light.

For such a great video, it was ruined by the bullet animation being totally incorrect

If the speed of light is constant at 300,000,000m/s, how does it make sense to have a square of it. Doesn't it mean realistically it's impossible to convert mass/ rest energy to its full total energy amount.

Awesome videos, low views for the great quality of content!

I knew we were all energy beings👁🧿

0:00 to 0:20 is totally wrong Mass stays the same because it’s invariant under a change of frame of reference. Unless, you specify what “mass” are you talking about. If relativistic mass then it’s ok but the rest of the video incorrect. If we agree on a inertial mass then the rest of the video is correct but the first 20 second is wrong.

At 2min 43 sek in the video it tries to impress the watcher that 448 900 000 000 000 000 m/h is a "huge number", (not to mention it beeing squared). Try to look at the number relatively. If one "new" mile would be 448 900 000 000 000 000 "old" miles, then the speed of light would be 1 new mile/hour, and squared it would still be 1 (one). Thus E=m*1 which makes the "c squared " superfluous. The video should reveal "The Real Meaning of E=mc2" . I still don´t understand. And that goes for the rest of all KZread- clips which has the same ambition. KZread- commentators, explain it!

Quality content. But slow down your narration and use simpler words.

👏

the secrets of E=MC² equation!

2 questions: 1) why do your videos look like the videos from kurzgesagt? 2) do you need editors?

If you discover how to convert matter to energy. Can you reverse the energy back to it’s original form of that matter.

bullet is that grey thing on the end of the projectile

Title of Einstein's 1905 L≈∆mc² paper: _Does the INERTIA of a body depend_ _on its ENERGY content?_ -He refers here to INERTIA (∆m), NOT "MASS" (m)‼️

Remember light us the only pure and literally energy, rest energies are from gravity, momentum,force,accle and praticles vibration and movement.

love your vids, but the style reminds me of kurzgesagt tho, i am expecting a reply :).

Kurzgesagr, perceptions and koranos has a similar animation style , but the narrator of kurzgesagt got something else this narrator sounds like whatifnarrator or brain tips