Although outclassed by most MBTs, this tank could be comparable to South Africa's Olifant tank, Romanian TR-85, Bangladesh Type 59 Durjoy, Pakistan Al-Zarrar, and Taiwanese M48 and M60 modernizations.

@jakearmstrong335

2 жыл бұрын

I absolutely love the Olifant. Personally I feel like the TR-85 is the worst on the list. It would would great to see more videos on those vehicles

@patriotenfield3276

2 жыл бұрын

You forgot to Mention India's Vijayanta MBT.

@keeperoftruth5951

2 жыл бұрын

@@patriotenfield3276 arjun

@kazomazo6646

2 жыл бұрын

The best upgrad program is the T-55M8A2 Typhoon

@tankguy5312

Жыл бұрын

There could be a way to upgun the vietnamese t54 just like the chinese wz-122 with a 120mm smoothbore gun

we abandened the Israeli version for a more localised prototype which make us in controll of most stages of the upgrade called T54M

@williambenedictalava2634

2 жыл бұрын

Dude your country got some balls cheers.

@nhienleminhhue6605

2 жыл бұрын

@@williambenedictalava2634 bro, our military plan is to ultimately locally produce or upgrade every piece of equipment in our arsenal.

@williambenedictalava2634

2 жыл бұрын

@@nhienleminhhue6605 now that's based self reliance.

@williambenedictalava2634

2 жыл бұрын

@@nhienleminhhue6605 How' the progress of the modernization of the T-54/55 now?

@nhienleminhhue6605

2 жыл бұрын

@@williambenedictalava2634 4 prototypes have been presented to the public. But our military has a tradition of hiding good stuff from the public so maybe until we have fully upgraded all T54/55/59 in the arsenal then we may know about the progress just like the VCM-1 cruise missile.

Vietnam and Israel's tank project?! Wow! I never expect these two will make a collaboration on modernizing a Soviet tank.

@ymishaus2266

2 жыл бұрын

Israel will take your money no matter who you are.

@xboxstudent

2 жыл бұрын

Did you surprise? The whole modernization process of most SEA nations armies, all had the hands of Israelis in there, no matter the ideology

@comentedonakeyboard

2 жыл бұрын

Why not? Since both have loads of T54/55 (and no hostilities among them) this coop makes sense.

@xboxstudent

2 жыл бұрын

​@@comentedonakeyboard Actually, there were hostilities between us and the Israelis in the past (some still persist until now, but both sides refused to mention it due to economic's sake). For example, we harbored Palestinian refugees (which we still do), and many people that related to Yasser Arafat (some still live in Vietnam). We used to support Hamas and helped them with weapons, training, and materials until Arafat was assassinated, and we also supported Syria (now we are on a neutral stance with them), Gaddafi's Lybia, Saddam's Iraq too. Also, Israel sent aid and money to anti-regime groups/individuals and various NGOs in our country., which is plagued with neoliberal ideals and sleeper agents that preparing for a color revolution.

@HanSolo__

2 жыл бұрын

@@ymishaus2266 No. Everyone will take others' money no matter who they are aside from direct enemies. But purchasing guns in Russia by Ukrainian army specialists and other such cases did happen in the past.

I was about to sleep, but this is better

I was wondering what they expected to do with this upgrade, since it would still leave a T-54 seriously outclassed by modern MBTs; but using them as infantry support, primarily against APCs, FSVs, and IFVs makes sense.

@Huweeey

2 жыл бұрын

Probably a reason why we had to buy T-90s from Russia.

@Aes880

2 жыл бұрын

The border roads can barly support 30t vehicle with only 3 road support up to 40t, it kindda make sense since no modern MBT can cross them

@user_____M

2 жыл бұрын

They're used for population control at this point, at best for a defensive role in potential local war. Anything else will make them death traps for their crews.

@LUCNUKEM

2 жыл бұрын

@@user_____M & to fight lighter enemy vehicles that can be airlifted behind the front lines or delivered by amphibious assault. These tanks are after all filling the role of reserve units.

@johnknapp952

2 жыл бұрын

Vietnam only has to deal with what China has, not what the Western nations have. And China is still far from being on par with the Western equipment.

I don't think they are using T54M as MBT but as infantry support. The MBT role relied on T90 line.

@EE-gt1nm

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, the Infantry supports the tank

@mrmakhno3030

2 жыл бұрын

This tank can fight against Type 15. Type 15 is the 1st line tank in the future conflict since it has good mobility on mountainous area. Type 96 and 99 will be at 2nd line and be confronted with them will be T 90S.

@quoccuongtran724

2 ай бұрын

the best anti-tank platforms are ATGM, a kamikaze drone, an FPV drone carrying 4 PG-7V warheads and a 122mm howitzer with an UAV coordinate corrector as seen in Ukraina, tanks are mostly for infantry support & penetration of enemy fortification; tank on tank duels are almost a 2nd thought

If you see what Vietnam's neighbors are operating you will ubderstand why the t54s are still a decent choice in the region. The new t90s and t72s are only acquired recently in response to those countries buying small amount of newer tanks as well. As for China, since thr border between the 2 countries are not favourable for tanks, it was decided that an arms race in tanks was not necessary

@niuchajianfa6222

11 ай бұрын

how about the fact the land border between viet and china is settled and a land war would be crazy for both sides?

@rampoatchess2758

10 ай бұрын

​@@niuchajianfa6222 China would rather want a naval war/amphibious war, since they would easily outmatch the Vietnamese with sheer number. They will take alot of lost, yes. But they will overmatch the small number of garrisoned troop on the islands sooner or later and Vietnam cant do much about that because Chinese navy is one of the largest, same with their airforce, a naval blockage and a no-fly zone would mean the end to Vietnam's sovereignty of the island. They are trying to use diplomatic solutions to stop this.

@quoccuongtran724

2 ай бұрын

@@niuchajianfa6222 it would be 1979 but with drones

Hello, can you help me understand what the numbers that are stamped on the front of a T-55 hull mean? The one I visited in Croatia had "HO2rT44471." The small r is a Russian letter, I'm not sure what it would be in English. I would be grateful for your help:)

I would like to see the Magach series. From 1 to 7, eventually leading to the Israeli modification for Turkish MBTs: Sabra.

@TanksEncyclopediaYT

2 жыл бұрын

Hello Darren, While such articles are within our sights and within our scope, they are not currently in the works. You can add them to our Public Suggestion List and you can help by adding more sources (or other suggested articles) docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p0Ll9TITGDiF9_fdS-tv1797JBs0_-pB70ReE_kIRkE/edit#gid=1911430820 Also, in order to help us with illustrating and publishing, please do consider donating through Patreon or Paypal. www.patreon.com/tankartfund

@user-hi6nz5vy9r

2 жыл бұрын

my dad served in a magah 6 gimel

The Vietnamese call their own simplification project as T-54M not T-54M3 that only for the orginal Isreali upgrade Also there barely any T-55 in PAVN service

@Mrcantfapenough

2 жыл бұрын

It is literally the most numerous tank they have.

@Aes880

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mrcantfapenough nope old T-54 are the most numerous , T-55 are much less common

@Mrcantfapenough

2 жыл бұрын

@@Aes880 Yeah, I thought you were talking about t54/55s, they're usually bunched in together.

@nhienleminhhue6605

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mrcantfapenough well, in 1979 the USSR agreed to deliver us a few dozens T55 tanks.

Yessss finally a tank from my country :3

@darnit1944

2 жыл бұрын

Which one, Vietnam or Israel lol

@cm10_iron_

2 жыл бұрын

@@darnit1944 Vietnam 🇻🇳😅😂

@enverhoxha545

2 жыл бұрын

@@darnit1944 israel doesnt exist lol..Vietnam is real

@darnit1944

2 жыл бұрын

@@enverhoxha545 Just so you know, it cost $0 to talk about nicer things like tanks, and you wasted it on this? Go away. You are not welcomed here.

In the video you said they ordered T90S and T90SK. But the picture desciption says T90S and T90KS. Its around the 2min50. Did that slip through or is it me not understanding something? :)

@TanksEncyclopediaYT

2 жыл бұрын

T-90SK is correct.

@getoastet1075

2 жыл бұрын

@@TanksEncyclopediaYT okay thanks for the answer :) have a great day :)

@jerryle379

2 жыл бұрын

@@TanksEncyclopediaYT btw the photo of tank did have t62 it the tank next to the bmp2 ; the radio system on t54m ( M3 is Israel upgrade with 105mm) is viettel ( they are telecom company but also made radar ; radio ; communication! Electronic warfare system and the domestic anti ship missile project call vcm01 ( basic a form of kh35 used Korean engine ; domestic radar VV) ; another reason to keep 100mm is we have a production line for the 100mm round ; plus 105mm and 100mm won't able to pen top tier china tank anyway ( anti tank role are for rpg 7 and29 ( domestic made ) team and t90 ( for now 64 tank ) btw another different of t54/55m vs M3 is the commander get his own night/day/thermal sight that M3 didn't have

T55m3 on video Me: WELL YESS

The Vietnamese have produced a APFSDS round for the D10 gun. This will allow it to take out modern tanks. Furthermore, the T-54M can now shoot while on the move. The fighting in Ukraine has proven that heavy armor means nothing in the face of anti-tank missiles. Therefore, the T54M will survive just as well as a Challenger.

To anyone who's gonna type "oMFg JuST BuY thE T90 tHeN" have you seen their production rate? By the time the PAVN is able to replace all the t54/55s,... the t90 will already be obsolete, so this modification and all the t90s/sk are adequate as stop-gaps in case of war

Obviously not a MBT, but for the amount of money Vietnam had to spend, its not bad at all. Did they have these when they kicked China's butt?

@d3203

2 жыл бұрын

they had these already when they fought the US

@georgedang449

2 жыл бұрын

The answer is no, and no. They didn't have those, only the original T-54/55s, and they didn't "kick China's butt." They withdrew from border cities, let China's punch hit air, then harassed them while they withdrew. They knew the Chinese never intended to occupy territories, only to damage Vietnamese military in a show of force, to deter the sporadic border attacks on Chinese civilians in the border regions. The problem with internal propaganda is it can lead to disastrous future decisions based on fictionalized past events. Had the Vietnamese actually fought the Chinese head on with tanks, it would have been catastrophic. This balance of power remains true today, in both quality and quantity. No modernization of T-55s can come close to Type-99's specs. Not even Russian T-90s can. It takes T-14, and they're not for sale. What the Vietnamese did instead is an act of both strategic and political genius, the smartest thing they could have done against impossible odds. It should have been celebrated as such, not propagandized into its exact opposite - a head on defense that would have been both dumb and impossible.

@jerryle379

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgedang449 good luck using type 99 in Vietnam or even Guangxi + Yunan ; there is reason type99 keep in north china plus if you ever visit border region of Vietnam and china you will know it not a tank terrain ; it infantry heaven

@georgedang449

2 жыл бұрын

@@jerryle379 Of course. The Chinese sending in tank columns into northern Vietnamese jungles at the time was a poor decision bordering on nonsensical, as was the whole idea of "gee, the new incoming administration is still being spunky, we'll show them by overrunning a few border cities that we have no intention of ever holding, and that'll improve relations somehow by showing them who's boss." Good luck intimidating the viet con. This kind of shenanigan was a clear indication Deng was getting senile by then. Meeting the Chinese en force, with the T54/55s the Vietnamese had, would have been even greater lunacy. That's what I was pointing out. Sinking the Chinese into a quagmire would have prevented the quick withdrew that happened almost immediately (Deng's moment of clarity?), and resulted in an even greater catastrophe than our Vietnam War. When it comes to the Vietnam War, what people don't talk about is, most of the causalities in the were Vietnamese, not Americans. Vietnamese children are still being maimed by unexploded cluster bombs/mines, or born without arms or legs to begin with due to residue agent orange. The kind of manpower and sustained munition manufacturing capacity of the Chinese would have burned Vietnam until there's nothing left. The Vietnamese government deserve praise for making the only rational choice considering the situation - by not fighting. This is why whenever some ignorant Vietnamese today try to rewrite history as some kind of "great victory" for Vietnam, they're doing a disservice to their homeland. This is why Vietnam isn't ready for democracy. The mob rule's knee jerk reflex would have led themselves into hell. The authoritarian government currently in charge is wise, and their action rational and measured. Their actions in recent years all reflect the rational self interest for the Vietnamese people - de-escalation of South China Sea claims and slow withdrew, avoiding officially taking sides in America's trade war while benefiting from it (drawing investment from Chinese businesses trying to escape tariff, re-labeling Made in China goods as Made in Vietnam and reselling to us for a profit, etc). What Vietnam need is time to grew its economy, the exact path China took 40 years ago, not seeking conflicts.

@jerryle379

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgedang449 since when Vietnam withdrew in south china sea we still held our island 😂 stop making false claim

I remember , the newspaper said the t55m3 is use too support t-72 and soldiers

what about the T-55 upgrade TIFON-2?

Is there a better upgraded program for T-45 & T-55 than T-55M8A2 Typhoon?

@tragiet367

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

at 14:35 from left to right should be bmp2, T62 and T 54/55 i think

Any chance of a video about TR-85 m1 tank?

@TanksEncyclopediaYT

2 жыл бұрын

Hello, While such articles are within our sights and within our scope, they are not currently in the works. You can add them to our Public Suggestion List and you can help by adding more sources (or other suggested articles) docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p0Ll9TITGDiF9_fdS-tv1797JBs0_-pB70ReE_kIRkE/edit#gid=1911430820 Also, in order to help us with illustrating and publishing, please do consider donating through Patreon or Paypal. www.patreon.com/tankartfund

The T-72B1MS is a nice tank

When the chips are down all that matters is: Does it still shoot big fun? Yes? It's good.

What's the situation of the american origen vehicles in Vietnam? Are they operative, in reserve or they are just museum pieces?

@thangtrinh3237

2 жыл бұрын

You can watch this video to find out about their conditions and other US equipments in Vietnam as well kzread.info/dash/bejne/dYScqNGppNPRmag.html

@deltafa23

2 жыл бұрын

@@thangtrinh3237 thanks

underrated tank

the modern tank is the essential weapon in the modern battlefield

I wonder how valuable big heavy MBT's are in Viet Nam? Are they able to operate usefully?

@mrmakhno3030

2 жыл бұрын

No, the landscape of Vietnam only allow MBT to operate usefully in maybe 1/4 of the country. The Mekong Delta was seperated by multiple rivers and water line so its really hard for some big guy like Type 99A or Abrams. The rest is the paradise of light tank. In the past is PT 76, Type 62 and M 41 , now is VT 5 (of China, not Vietnam).

@mrmakhno3030

2 жыл бұрын

Best battlefield for MBT in Vietnam is: -Northern Vietnam, instead of mountainous area -Coastal land in Central Vietnam -northern part of central highland -the urban of HCMC The rest is too risky for tanks.

1:55 tank 025 is a T 62.

omfg why u no t90?!?!

Imagine a standard T-54 having 800hp... I like these videos, but too often do you need to improve on the quality. Often than not, do the narrators forget to say something listed on the screen, say something that is wrong information or missread information they want to express. Perhaps check the paragraph before reading it monotonically. But still enjoy to learn history or new info about ifv's which i didnt know

Why didn’t they just buy T 72b’s? Like they’re cheaper than modernized versions of the T 55

@jerryle379

2 жыл бұрын

This upgrade doesn't cost much ; era domestic ; commander new digital camera system are domestic ; heck most expensive thing on the upgrade is Spanish fire and control system which doesn't cost much ; plus we have factory for the tank amunition and tons of amunition for the 100mm

@origreena

9 ай бұрын

The answer is number and cost, 850 to 1000+ T54 (almost 1/5 of China/US entire tank force in terms of number) by the time all of them got replaced even T90 and T72 will be obsolete

Elbit offers upgrades to about anyone willing to pay for them, and they have pretty good upgrades to sell to be fair... But the price its not allways cheap, like in this case... despite how much reactive armor, LWR, APU, new cannon and other stuffs are added, at the end of the day the T-55 chasis its not worth the effort, unlike T-72's

So what is the best upgraded model of T-55 in current days in 2022? That make it as close as possible to a modern MBT ? So it can face Leopard 2a7V for example :) XD

@mrmakhno3030

2 жыл бұрын

Type 59G. They have 2nd gen ERA, new turret and new 800 hp engine. The most important thing is they was equipped with a smoothbore 125 mm main gun from Type 96 with semi auto loader. They also have modern FCS and 2 nd gen thermal imaging, same with T 90S.

@kazomazo6646

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrmakhno3030 It is better than the T-55M8A2 Typhoon ?

@mrmakhno3030

2 жыл бұрын

@@kazomazo6646 better, since its price is acceptable. I rather buy a new tank than buy anything as AGM, M6 or M8A2. An old T 72A or B with Indira FCS will get the same firepower as these but much cheaper.

The recent events in Ukraine has shown that not all tech is what it is cut out to be. There are limited numbers of these expensive new MBT's. A guy on a bike with an upgraded man portable AT can be a deal breaker.

@rampoatchess2758

10 ай бұрын

You forgot the fact that, Vietnam terrain doesnt support both tanks and AT weapons like the javelins. And a guy on a bike would either have to use the main road or is an excellent rider to use a bike in a Vietnamese jungle/highland without being eliminated by infantry.

@cuongle7990

10 ай бұрын

The terrain of the border regions north of Vietnam is very mountainous, unlike the open fields of eastern Ukraine. The biggest advantage of modern ATGMs are their engagement ranges, often longer than the reach of tanks. That's not going to work in Vietnam as advanced top attack missiles like the Javelin need a minimum distance to achieved its attack trajectory, while direct attack ATGMs like the TOWs need line of sight. Engaging tanks in ambushes at close range are possible, but not very practical as Vietnam would most likely be the defender in any armed conflict.

@tungsteng1

10 ай бұрын

At least you sense something. The 30 tons class tank aka T54/55 was proven to be mobile on most of terrain of VN, including hilly and highland, bogland and coast line, so was it supported by the road. The 50 tons class tank like M48 could only operate in a small zone. And so does most of MBT in the world, including chinese. Now there is only a 45 tons class of MBT, that's to say T72/90 family, which is not unoperationable like other MBT, so they bought 2 batallions for checking a real combat capability and standard of modern MBT. Mind you none of so called modern western MBT ever get in their eyes, as they were considered more than useless like nipple on fish. Apparently, operating T90 gave them insight of modern standard MBT and a very big hint to operate modernize T54M as well.

The best t- 55 upgraded is tifon A -4 peruvian casanave and ucraine .

@luisibanez3600

9 ай бұрын

Tifon 2A is the best t-55 upgraded .

@luisibanez3600

9 ай бұрын

❤

4 Million dollars for an upgraded T54/55, wow. At that price why not buy more T90s.

@nam430

2 жыл бұрын

Cause thats how much t90 cost for russians, not everyone else

@cuongle7990

Жыл бұрын

4 million dollars is for an "Israeli" upgraded T54. The VPA abandoned the cooperation project and decided to do the upgrades themselves, which is much cheaper at around $750k per tank.

Similar modernisation like on Slovenian M55S wich are in action in ukrainian war.

China must be excited.

Correction: the Vietnam War began in 1955, not 1964

@pumelo1

11 ай бұрын

???

Vietnam not being able to purchase the most advanced MBT is a direct result of North Vietnam taking over the whole country. Japan, South Korea, West Germany (it used to be West and East Germany), all these countries were in the American sphere of influence. Today they are doing well. It's such a pity because Vietnamese people are great. I've met many Vietnamese in Poland.

@Huweeey

Жыл бұрын

Both of us and Americans are already moved on and pretty chill with each other nowadays though politics aside Even we do have interest from the American military industry, since Lockheed Martin actually visited our military exhibition last year and told us that we could buy their F-16s and C130s. Problem is the budget for the military is very tight and we can afford what is essential to the modern battlefield and localize production and upgrades.

@Minh-Tran-04

Жыл бұрын

Save those words for the non-communist countries like the Philippines or Thailand

@niuchajianfa6222

11 ай бұрын

are you trying to insult the philippines?

Just sell them in their original form and buy new tanks with those money!!

@cascadianrangers728

2 жыл бұрын

id buy a t54

@mr.monhon5179

2 жыл бұрын

Sell to who? Have you ever try exporting pork to Saudi Arabia?

@christineshotton824

Жыл бұрын

@@mr.monhon5179 That's funny, and accurate. You can only sell what people want to buy. To make old T-54/55s attractive to a potential buyer, they would need to be upgraded to a level that made them useful for Vietnam; so why sell?

@DingDang3D

Жыл бұрын

@@christineshotton824 Selling 3000 tanks is not easy, it's enough to equip the whole asean, upgrading according to the domestic method is actually not too expensive.

how come Israel always upgrades old weapons from weaker countries? they accept low price that western/chinese/russian would never go for?

@davestevens6283

Жыл бұрын

It's a combination of a huge military industry with lower restrictions on weapon exports (The Israeli government uses it as a foreign policy instrument but with less demands than a world-class military or economic powerhouse, plus it makes the companies profitable and stable), vast experience with battle proven upgrade programs for weaponry of various sources, and probably willingness to sell the best available version at a lower price.

@DingDang3D

Жыл бұрын

@@davestevens6283 If you don't know, even Vietnam produces and exports a lot of light weapons to less developed countries. Vietnam is not a top military power countries but it still has the power to rank 19 and it is still above hundreds of other countries

@davestevens6283

Жыл бұрын

@@DingDang3D Point was mostly that Israeli weaponry comes with less strings attached - as a buyer you don't have to align yourself with any particular power or policy and it's geopolitical interests for continued support or take on demands for internal demands\limitations. For many leaders\politicians from smaller nations it's a significant advantage. And yes, obviously, many countries, including Vietnam have their own industries. and every once in a while a smaller, non-major power nation might become a world leader with developing a certain system - like Sweden had the Bofors AA guns and Poland has the Piroun MANPADS.

@quoccuongtran724

2 ай бұрын

@@davestevens6283 hmm yep after the wars it has with the surrounding Arab countries, Israel is left with a bunch of captured hardwares, often of Soviet origin, plus a number of surplus hardwares transfered from other Western powers it would be natural for Israel to tinker with these hardwares of various sources and gain a lot of upgrade experiences to these old hardwares

It’s really weird how Vietnam being in the socialist bloc got military assistance from Israel. I wonder how that affects their relationship with Palestine

@_PhamTuanCuong

2 жыл бұрын

We abandoned their offer and do our own upgrades instead, so no loss there

@mr.monhon5179

2 жыл бұрын

Who care about the relation with Palestine anyway? They're literally irrelevant compare to anything the Israelis can offer us. But we'd rather put it under domestic production as much as possible, cuz relying on importing weapons across the ocean isn't so efficient.

@rootin222

2 жыл бұрын

@@_PhamTuanCuong Vietnam is great socialist country I wish they cut ties with Israel

@hainhatnguyen5486

2 жыл бұрын

@@rootin222 we want to stay neutral, make friends with everyone, no joining military alliance and only support peace

@quoccuongtran724

2 ай бұрын

we play with both sides there is no reason to denounce 1 side

Didn't bother watching but they realized israeli plan cost too much to "modernize" it compared to just buying T-90, and then T-90 was considered too costly too so they went back to trying to pretend to modernize it with addon boxes that may or may not be filled with wood.

@Aes880

2 жыл бұрын

Lol

@coolbox8545

2 жыл бұрын

PAVN leadership realized that they could not affordably replace the T-54/55 fleet with more potent T-72B3 or even T-90S/SK, at least not with the budget the Ground Forces were split. Therefore, they chose to repurpose the T-54/55s into essentially IFVs, or rather gun platforms and chose to upgrade them to Vietnamese M standards and go along with it. They wanted the best performance (as an gun platform of course) with the most reasonable price tag they could get their hands on. There are some genuinely sound deviations from the plans plotted out by the Israelis, such as the retaining of the 100mm (as opposed to changing it to the 105mm as the Israelis had suggested) simply because they know that even with the 105mm, it couldn't compare to Chinese main battle tanks so might as well have the old 100mm (which the military has an ungodly large amount of ammunition for). As well as retaining the engine on the new T-54M May I ask, what gives you the impression that the genuine upgrades given to the vehicle are fake? And that the PAVNMI has to 'pretend' to upgrade them, despite having the full capability to do so?

@EcchiRevenge

2 жыл бұрын

@@coolbox8545 because as you admitted, pavn is poor. And if they had the full capability then there wouldn't be budget/component problem.

@yesyes4784

2 жыл бұрын

@@EcchiRevenge because a large amount of funding went to the airforce and the navy

@jerryle379

2 жыл бұрын

@@EcchiRevenge 8 billion ish dollar. Per year most go forward air force air defense and navy ; rest go to R/D for radar ; anti ship missile project and other thing and ground force get what ever left over ; there won't be any ground war in anytime soon ; if war happens it will happens in south china sea and it will be air/navy small short conflict

cheaper to just buy Chinese...at least you will get the L7 gun

@quoccuongtran724

2 ай бұрын

bruh as if the USA would sell weapon to Iran tomorrow