Official Tanks Encyclopedia Channel (www.tanks-encyclopedia.com) - curation of valuable documentaries and footage of tanks and AFVs from the Great War to Modern conflicts around the globe.
could you do one about the portuguese daimlers and or the Panhart ETT, APC based on Panhard EBR, during the "ultramar war" or also knowned was the portuguese vietnam
@FGB120120 минут бұрын
there are others but this is good for now, for example the own made vehicles of portugal
@markaxworthy2508Сағат бұрын
The Germans, who had much greater industrial resources, only managed to get a 47mm SP gun onto the R35 chassis. In doing so, they also made the vehicle much higher, lost the 360 degree turret rotation and the thicker armour of the turret. It looks as though 45mm/47mm guns were all that could be fitted and the Romanian solution seems to have had these three advantages over the German solution.
@cybernetic_crocodile8462Сағат бұрын
I must be honest, this tank was garbage. Then again, Romania and other Eastern Europe countries often had no choice, but to rely on garbage like this. That damn war truly was unwinnable scenario for Eastern Eurpean countries outside of USSR. Well, maybe Poland and Czechoslovakia could have had some small chance to defend, if they had more time to prepare.
@MaxCroatСағат бұрын
Bro what is with that claim that germany was a pioneer before the war and entered the conflict with superior tanks than the others? The reality was quite literally the opposite, they had mediocre tanks when compared to certain allied tanks, especially when they invaded USSR and faced the T-34, but those later larger and more complex german tanks, while they did have issues of their own as you mentioned, were the actual reason why german tanks were considered superior. Nobody considered the panzer 2 superior to the czech or french light tanks, nobody considered early variants of panzers 3 and 4 superior to early T-34s either.
@appendixpower55382 сағат бұрын
Sir, we turned our obsolete tank into a tank destroyer! Aha, just like the germans do! What did you fit on there? A ZIS-2? Or even a Mighti 75mm Reşiţa or PAK 40? No..a 45mm...
@murmaider22 сағат бұрын
low tier france needs this lol
@billlong96063 сағат бұрын
a "Tankette" hunter surely? 😉
@mchrome33663 сағат бұрын
Great report on a van almost never mentioned axis nation holding the lines. Your dates are wrong especially since the Hungarian army was destroyed in mid December 1942 in operation Little Saturn and the Hungarian army couldn’t have been engaging the Russians in January 1943 because they had been destroyed. So what battles are you talking about after December 16th 1942 that weren’t their forces being surrounded and surrendered? Are your dates just wrong?
@Ulani1013 сағат бұрын
My own thought is that stripping off the turret, and mounting a decent anti-tank gun would have been so much better. Fitting a 45mm in 1944 was pointless, really.
@TanksEncyclopediaYT3 сағат бұрын
So, TACAM R-2 and TACAM T-60?
@markaxworthy2508Сағат бұрын
The Germans, who had much greater industrial resources, only managed to get a 47mm SP gun onto the R35 chassis. They also made the vehicle much higher, lost the 360 degree turret rotation and the thicker armour of the turret. It looks as though 45mm/47mm guns were all that could be fitted and the Romanian solution seems to have had three advantages over the German solution.
@hyneksmid32933 сағат бұрын
Do please Spanish Panzerkampfwagen I ‘Breda.
@mrmarioro73584 сағат бұрын
Yay Romanian tanks!
@T_PLAYER4 сағат бұрын
i am one of the lucky ones who saw this things turret personally. its a war memorial now, for the memory of the battle near hron (river in slovakia) in 1945, and for the victims of those wars, of rows of red army and romanian soldiers
@AkeN9964 сағат бұрын
Thanks for talking about lesser-known nations’ WW2 equipment 💯
@bwilliams4635 сағат бұрын
8:56 I've seen that explosion footage somewhere before. Is it an actual WW2 combat recording?
@GerardMenvussa4 сағат бұрын
This footage also caught my attention the first time I saw it, it was a R35, but not sure where and when exactly this was filmed. I asked about it once and was told the footage came from a documentary called Apocalypse, but I never watched it myself.
@flatheadgg24433 сағат бұрын
It looks kinda fake because the explosion seems to come from directly underneath the tank with no visible impact. I doubt that a mine would have that much power so combined with the fact that it doesn't seem to move it was probably rigged with explosives for propaganda footage.
@Floreal782 сағат бұрын
It's a scene from a german ww2 propaganda movie made in 1941 called "Stukas", the movie is available on youtube. Go to around 33 minutes into the film and it is a long sequence, the tanks show up several times in the film: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h3uAt6WdftPbXZc.html
@GreatHunters25 сағат бұрын
Thx I'm from Romania
@FRIEND_7117 сағат бұрын
This is an awesome video but it really needs to be updated. ^^""" I can find so many mistakes from nitpicks to just outright wrong. Especially the 4th tank division bit. I really need to finish my work and finally put that misconception to rest.
@Milan-nc9ql7 сағат бұрын
If you Romanians make with Amerikans hugest base Nato you will get in your tale!
@oghuz_kaghan12 сағат бұрын
if that project would be real that would be great but it came out that it was just speculation😢
@FairladyS13012 сағат бұрын
Tests involving British and American tanks were carried out in New Guinea which resulted in selection of the Matilda II so it wasn't a random selection. The 2 pounder was used against Japanese bunkers, quite effectively too against the logs used.
@colorado84119 сағат бұрын
4:34 And now a word from our sponsor.
@MostlyPennyCatКүн бұрын
37mm? 😂 You might as well use harsh language.
@guyh9992Күн бұрын
The later campaigns the Australians were involved in are often portrayed as sideshows but no more so than the "sideshows" the Allies were involved in 1945 such as Italy, Burma and Mindanao. Even MacArthur's campaign in the Philippines is seen as such by US Navy and Marines fans these days. Bougainville and New Guinea were Australian protectorates under League of Nation mandates so PM John Curtin thought there was a legal obligation to fully liberate them. Apart from the oil reserves, the Japanese in Borneo put up a much stronger resistance than expected because they assumed it would be used as a stepping stone back to Singapore which had actually been proposed by the British High Command in 1944 but resisted by Churchill who preferred a "Bay of Bengal solution". From Borneo the Allies could also be deployed to liberate Java or Indochina, opening up supply lines to China through Vietnam.
@mikeyrose4183Күн бұрын
thanks 🇺🇸👹
@FreewheelnFranklinКүн бұрын
That was an awesome build!! Great job👍 all govt corrupt eye for an eye
Пікірлер
Unbelievable amounts of money....
When desperation causes you to buy french
could you do one about the portuguese daimlers and or the Panhart ETT, APC based on Panhard EBR, during the "ultramar war" or also knowned was the portuguese vietnam
there are others but this is good for now, for example the own made vehicles of portugal
The Germans, who had much greater industrial resources, only managed to get a 47mm SP gun onto the R35 chassis. In doing so, they also made the vehicle much higher, lost the 360 degree turret rotation and the thicker armour of the turret. It looks as though 45mm/47mm guns were all that could be fitted and the Romanian solution seems to have had these three advantages over the German solution.
I must be honest, this tank was garbage. Then again, Romania and other Eastern Europe countries often had no choice, but to rely on garbage like this. That damn war truly was unwinnable scenario for Eastern Eurpean countries outside of USSR. Well, maybe Poland and Czechoslovakia could have had some small chance to defend, if they had more time to prepare.
Bro what is with that claim that germany was a pioneer before the war and entered the conflict with superior tanks than the others? The reality was quite literally the opposite, they had mediocre tanks when compared to certain allied tanks, especially when they invaded USSR and faced the T-34, but those later larger and more complex german tanks, while they did have issues of their own as you mentioned, were the actual reason why german tanks were considered superior. Nobody considered the panzer 2 superior to the czech or french light tanks, nobody considered early variants of panzers 3 and 4 superior to early T-34s either.
Sir, we turned our obsolete tank into a tank destroyer! Aha, just like the germans do! What did you fit on there? A ZIS-2? Or even a Mighti 75mm Reşiţa or PAK 40? No..a 45mm...
low tier france needs this lol
a "Tankette" hunter surely? 😉
Great report on a van almost never mentioned axis nation holding the lines. Your dates are wrong especially since the Hungarian army was destroyed in mid December 1942 in operation Little Saturn and the Hungarian army couldn’t have been engaging the Russians in January 1943 because they had been destroyed. So what battles are you talking about after December 16th 1942 that weren’t their forces being surrounded and surrendered? Are your dates just wrong?
My own thought is that stripping off the turret, and mounting a decent anti-tank gun would have been so much better. Fitting a 45mm in 1944 was pointless, really.
So, TACAM R-2 and TACAM T-60?
The Germans, who had much greater industrial resources, only managed to get a 47mm SP gun onto the R35 chassis. They also made the vehicle much higher, lost the 360 degree turret rotation and the thicker armour of the turret. It looks as though 45mm/47mm guns were all that could be fitted and the Romanian solution seems to have had three advantages over the German solution.
Do please Spanish Panzerkampfwagen I ‘Breda.
Yay Romanian tanks!
i am one of the lucky ones who saw this things turret personally. its a war memorial now, for the memory of the battle near hron (river in slovakia) in 1945, and for the victims of those wars, of rows of red army and romanian soldiers
Thanks for talking about lesser-known nations’ WW2 equipment 💯
8:56 I've seen that explosion footage somewhere before. Is it an actual WW2 combat recording?
This footage also caught my attention the first time I saw it, it was a R35, but not sure where and when exactly this was filmed. I asked about it once and was told the footage came from a documentary called Apocalypse, but I never watched it myself.
It looks kinda fake because the explosion seems to come from directly underneath the tank with no visible impact. I doubt that a mine would have that much power so combined with the fact that it doesn't seem to move it was probably rigged with explosives for propaganda footage.
It's a scene from a german ww2 propaganda movie made in 1941 called "Stukas", the movie is available on youtube. Go to around 33 minutes into the film and it is a long sequence, the tanks show up several times in the film: kzread.info/dash/bejne/h3uAt6WdftPbXZc.html
Thx I'm from Romania
This is an awesome video but it really needs to be updated. ^^""" I can find so many mistakes from nitpicks to just outright wrong. Especially the 4th tank division bit. I really need to finish my work and finally put that misconception to rest.
If you Romanians make with Amerikans hugest base Nato you will get in your tale!
if that project would be real that would be great but it came out that it was just speculation😢
Tests involving British and American tanks were carried out in New Guinea which resulted in selection of the Matilda II so it wasn't a random selection. The 2 pounder was used against Japanese bunkers, quite effectively too against the logs used.
4:34 And now a word from our sponsor.
37mm? 😂 You might as well use harsh language.
The later campaigns the Australians were involved in are often portrayed as sideshows but no more so than the "sideshows" the Allies were involved in 1945 such as Italy, Burma and Mindanao. Even MacArthur's campaign in the Philippines is seen as such by US Navy and Marines fans these days. Bougainville and New Guinea were Australian protectorates under League of Nation mandates so PM John Curtin thought there was a legal obligation to fully liberate them. Apart from the oil reserves, the Japanese in Borneo put up a much stronger resistance than expected because they assumed it would be used as a stepping stone back to Singapore which had actually been proposed by the British High Command in 1944 but resisted by Churchill who preferred a "Bay of Bengal solution". From Borneo the Allies could also be deployed to liberate Java or Indochina, opening up supply lines to China through Vietnam.
thanks 🇺🇸👹
That was an awesome build!! Great job👍 all govt corrupt eye for an eye