The mathematics of love | Hannah Fry
Ғылым және технология
Finding the right mate is no cakewalk - but is it even mathematically likely? In a charming talk, mathematician Hannah Fry shows patterns in how we look for love, and gives her top three tips (verified by math!) for finding that special someone.
TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more.
Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at www.ted.com/translate
Follow TED news on Twitter: / tednews
Like TED on Facebook: / ted
Subscribe to our channel: / tedtalksdirector
Пікірлер: 754
I adore how she keeps making jokes and everyone is like -crickets- so she starts laughing at herself
@geronimopacis
6 жыл бұрын
People laugh at it, but only a few... so it doesn’t get picked up by the mic.
@Manas-co8wl
5 жыл бұрын
I don't get why people are keep saying this on TED, you can hear the laughters pretty easily with headphones on
@miriamkorver1443
4 жыл бұрын
The crowd is laughing, it's just not picked up by the microphones very well.
@davis7099
4 жыл бұрын
American audience would not understand "minger" ( unattractive woman in UK slang) and many other quips she makes to jazz up her maths driven lecture.
@grumpypandy8123
4 жыл бұрын
@@davis7099 I got it it wasn't very hard to understand
That one person who's like a 0.5/5 in attractiveness, yet received nearly 100 messages in a month is a goddamn winner LOL
@fidur2
7 жыл бұрын
The person with the highest attractiveness rating receives only 25. I guess people are scared of how good looking that person is.
@ALFABETAS999
5 жыл бұрын
The upper part of the chart are all girls and the bottom of the chart are all man.
@lizmarielaescobarcandia3153
4 жыл бұрын
You look attractive, how is going you?
@miriamkorver1443
4 жыл бұрын
@@ALFABETAS999 You do make a good point, it would be interesting to see the charts split up in gender.
@akorthouwer
4 жыл бұрын
@@miriamkorver1443 the studies of cupid was only about female ratings given by men
"Let's imagine that you starting dating at 15". yeah maybe in some alternate reality lmao
@becomepostal
5 жыл бұрын
DannyboyRFC06 ?
@lizmarielaescobarcandia3153
4 жыл бұрын
hahaah, i have 22, and nothing to tell you haahah
@miriamkorver1443
4 жыл бұрын
20 would be more likely, if you want to take a round number.
@paulgoogol2652
4 жыл бұрын
@@miriamkorver1443 I prefer symmetrical like 69. that's a good age to start.
@rever4217
4 жыл бұрын
@@paulgoogol2652 that's not symmetrical though
The first time I saw that 37% was in a Numberphile explanation of how to choose a toilet.
@liama23
5 жыл бұрын
Partner is equal to a toilet
@steff7395
5 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly it was also Hannah who was featured in that video
@stkyriakoulisdr
5 жыл бұрын
I am pretty sure the original name of the problem is called "the secretary problem"
@michaelroditis1952
4 жыл бұрын
@@steff7395 yeah i remember that 2
@ezio_Winchester
4 жыл бұрын
as a clerks fan every time I see the number 37 I have to say " in a row!!"
I've done all my calculations and the result is: Hannah Fry. Congtatulations Dr. Fry.
Why is the TED crowd laughing at the Sarah Jassica Parker joke, but ignoring the mathematicians jokes? This isn't the audience I was expecting at all.
@thumbwarriordx
7 жыл бұрын
I can't believe nobody laughed at the Piers Morgan burn.
@aknopf8173
5 жыл бұрын
I think the audience does not know what the topic will be? This way you can broaden your horizon and go see a math talk even if you usually don't like math. I think that is how TED works.
@johnroscoe2406
4 жыл бұрын
Oh for Christ sake stop being pretentious. "Hurr durrr they should be a higher caliber of person durrrr." Obnoxious.
@GrimSleepy
4 жыл бұрын
I thought it was only wealthy and 'well-to-do' people, which you can buy an education, but you cannot buy intellect. Well, until we get Crisper Genetic super babies.
One of my favourite TED Talks. I (as a Psychology undergraduate) really appreciate how the maths has been neatly woven into a topic that has a great psychological basis.
@simplicitas5113
2 жыл бұрын
Well the fact you find this so interesting as a professional, says a lot about your field and your poor lack of dating psychology.
Half the guys watching this fell in love with this speaker.
My favourite scientist. Her TV stuff is brilliant, and understandable.
"Love isn't rational" Pythagoras would be shocked
@alexeifando747
7 жыл бұрын
markog1999 Well if love is zero, then it can be rational :)
@Funhador
7 жыл бұрын
I see what you did there ... I'm slowly clapping to you...
@daominhdung5347
6 жыл бұрын
i'm laughing so hard for this
I can listen to her all day. What an incredible woman!
If this presentation lasted a little bit longer I could have fallen in love.
HANNAH FRY IS SO GORGEOUS
Curse you Hannah Fry with your engaging presentational style and marvellous voice!
Hannah Fry - Well you have taught this old man a lot. About music, algorithms, and the internet. Your book was a complete eye-opener. You have helped me with my recovery. Thank-you.
Best TED talk I've ever seen! I love using numbers to understand behaviour and she is so full of wit and charisma.
This woman was hilarious! Why was no one laughing at her jokes? Must have been a non British crowd. BTW, she is lovely. Anyone know if she's married yet?
@Steinwagner15
8 жыл бұрын
+Tobi Areje i was wondering the same too, I'm not even British but I was so confused why I was laughing by myself while the audience was dead silent.
@TwoBitWriter
8 жыл бұрын
+Tobi Areje I see a wedding ring on her left hand.
@Tboi2206
8 жыл бұрын
Richard Brand Well spotted
@ImKrazyFrench
8 жыл бұрын
+Tobi Areje She also says it in the presentation...
@Tboi2206
8 жыл бұрын
ImKrazyFrench Well heard
She's amazing. I could listen to her for hours
Too bad when perfect person #38 comes along, you're only #21 on their list. :)
@bigfletch8
9 жыл бұрын
Rules are like hearts.Made to be broken ;-)
@mpking1374
9 жыл бұрын
dowddash Let's just hope that the other person knows nothing about this theory.
@nematube
5 жыл бұрын
Story of my life.
@za012345678998765432
4 жыл бұрын
That's makes a really interesting question actually - Within a group of agents who are each searching for an optimal other agent within the same group, what's the optimal search strategy. is it still the 37% rule?
@sorcererdm200
4 жыл бұрын
@@za012345678998765432 37% rule works like this: With no other information, Given (N) number of options with a single unique(?) nonnegative parameter that is want to be maximized, Optimal search (or optimal stopping point, hence the name optimal stopping theory) is to 1) take (N*(1/e)) = N*(37%) of the options, ( where e = 2.7182 is eulers number) consider it as sample set and find the best option in them. 2) Then, you start looking at other options and stop when you find a better option than the one your sample set gave. 3) Fun trivia: This method gives you the best option of all the options with a probability of (1/e) = 37% For example, think you are choosing a random team in Fifa and you only care the star ratings they have, Now you can apply the "37% rule" to get the best team with 37% probability. But, your info is not limited with the star ratings only. You know that 5 star is the max. So, if you happen to get a 5 star team in any point of applying the rule, you can stop at that point, including "sample collection" In your question, If "being within the group" does not provide additional info, for ex, you know agent 007 is the best and you picked him similar to above case, then you can apply the "37% rule" to get the best agent with 37% probability.
She is my favourite female mathematician, by far! Just bought her books on audible.
She is an interesting speaker. I enjoy her passion for mathematics and her speech on the subject.
"Never let the sun go down on your anger" amen fam
She is now my new hero. About to sit Maths exam and need her to be my coach!
By the way, the graph she shows at 5:33 absolutely works for the popularity of things on the internet, such as youtube videos and news articles. If you say something controversial to get people in the comment section to bicker at each other, that will drive a lot of activity which will lead to recommendation engines pushing up its ranking. The end result: click bait, articles meant to irritate you, and popular authors being anything but qualified. The trollification of everything.
Really well put together presentation. Thanks Hannah
One of the most entertaining talks I've seen yet! :D
I really like her voice, great for listening.
The thing about hiding things that could scare off people on dating sites is absolutely true. I have noticed that I contact people who have something "negative" that I don't care about. Also, I am a member of two different websites. On one, I made a very attractive profile and on the other one I didn't really care. The latter attitude gains me a lot of attention from people who contacted me mostly because of something controversial that they shared or wanted to talk about. Be completely honest about yourself and show the crazy things you believe will scare everyone away. It actually helps.
I really love her accent and manner of speaking
Why is no one laughing, I was laughing out loud alone in my couch at her jokes...
How did anybody get me interested in mathematics??? Great job!!!
What a wonderful talk.
That giggle at 14:40 is priceless X-D (comparing husband-and-wife-fight with a nuclear war).
Saw you just yesterday on Numberphile :)
@WayneJohnsonZastil
9 жыл бұрын
Yeah she gets around if know what I mean haha
@TheAdamSmasherMultiverse
9 жыл бұрын
And Head Squeeze
@KuroKitten
9 жыл бұрын
Numberphile shoutout! If anyone who watched this video got more interested in Mathematics, I highly recommend you give the Numberphile channel a look! You might find yourself among a family you never knew you had =)
@miosotiroquroque4927
9 жыл бұрын
V& b
9:47 that hand gesture as a subtle reference to how life alone would likely go
Hi TED =), Thank you for taking the time and effort to both upload and share this video with the youtube family. I hope you have a nice day =). Raymond
She is amazing.
The 37% benchmark was very interesting. Thank you Hannah.
very interesting and well presented speech thanks hannah!
Hannah is a gem.
very very helpful! thanks
I just randomly find this video but I have spent 17 minutes to finish it because she is so funny and beautiful!
i am speachless... i came here from an other video of her about monopoly that when i first saw her i said naaah not a big deal but slightly later i felt in love with her just from the way she was interacting... i came here and found her teaching about mathematicks of love with an amazing speach and stage performance!!! OOOOHH my GOD Marrie me Hannah!!! The point is guys.... search for girls with internal energy and attitude like Hannah! Search for beauty on skin but value heavily more the beauty of mind//soul
Before I begin playing this video: Solving basic and advanced algebra equations kept my brain running! Math could have been frustrating, but I thoroughly enjoyed the heck out of it. I got smarter like that, like how people get stronger after doing muscle workouts at the gym.
Hannah Fry; simply stunning. also, brilliant, among other awesome things as well. what a lucky significant other she has.
I was afraid this talk was going to be like dissecting the frog -- you learn nothing and kill the frog. But this was actually really interesting and entertaining. :-)
@bigfletch8
9 жыл бұрын
Yes but will it result in more frogs being kissed by princesses.....rivit...rivit....
@patrickmcnerney9173
8 жыл бұрын
Shawn Ravenfire Very original analogy there my friend. I mean, its not like a similar analogy was used to explain why we shouldn't analyse humor by the author E.B. White.
@ShawnRavenfire
8 жыл бұрын
Patrick McNerney It's a common expression.
@mooghead
8 жыл бұрын
+Shawn Ravenfire Bit like every TED talk, they all appear boring until you watch them...
@anoukfleur2513
8 жыл бұрын
That's not how the expression goes... Short proof: dissecting a frog *does* make you learn.
An important note is that Divorce is *not* the termination of a *Happy* marriage. Divorce is the termination of an *Unhappy* marriage.
This was a great talk. John Gottman, Ph.D. writes the best relationship books I have read and they can be most helpful to those who want to improve their ability to have a healthy long term relationship.
Fascinating
What's 37% of 0?
@ApertureSCAEC2
4 жыл бұрын
Oof. When you said "0" I felt that
@waterunderthebridge7950
4 жыл бұрын
It’s 37% of the time period you want to spend on finding a partner, so 0 would mean you wanna get married for life this instant xD With that said, I totally feel you, bro
@kendrasheart
3 жыл бұрын
Lmao
Great talk!
I like Hannah Fry, i like her voice and she is really smart.
Smart, likes math, sense of humor, British accent and a ginger. I'm in love.
I love you, Hannah.
Numberphile :) Good to see the crossover of subscribers for both of these great channels :)
having been married 17 years, this really distinquishes me.
She's on numberphile too right?
@wirry
7 жыл бұрын
Yes!
Intelligent, Beautiful & A Great Sense of Humor! Teach me where I can find a woman like you!
wow the outro was very convincing!
Nice This expand my thoughts about the application of Maths
I think it might be the case that couples with lower negativity threshold actually break up much before in the stage of their relationship, and those that have a high negativity threshold, take up longer for the build up and the final act. Hence, such couples don't exist in the dataset, and only those of the lower negativity threshold appear that are already successful.
@Tuffpaddy03
Жыл бұрын
That’s a really good point. I think what you are talking about is called ‘survivorship bias’.
there's a good chapter on optimal stopping with regards to finding love in the book Algorithms to Love By, if anyone is interested
Great talk. As a lover of....well, love, and psychology, his research fascinates me.
thank you
Y'all need to listen to A Curious Case of Rutherford and Fry, it's great stuff
Just loooooooooooooove Hannah Fry! 👍🤓❤️
Love Hannah Fry!
I can’t imagine having enough people wanting to date me to have a valid 37%
@misam2124
4 жыл бұрын
You only need three people. Reject the first one (the first 33%) and marry the second, but if you meant valid as in precise it would be harder.
I first saw Hannah on Numberphile, she was brilliant and entertaining there, and this was equally brilliant and entertaining. Also, the name "Hannah" is awesome because it's a palindrome. That is all.
amazing
I love U, Hannah)
@nicholaskenneth113
3 жыл бұрын
simppp
@ryanmichaelhaley
2 жыл бұрын
I love her, too. I challenge you to a duel!
@ususshjd1994
2 жыл бұрын
sus
I think emotion is baseline-able and therefore predictable to a high extent. It just requires an incredible inductive attention.
It doesnt' hurt that she is a smart, well spoken, smoking hot red head with a sexy accent in terms of finding love. Mathematics aside.
@lastmiles
5 жыл бұрын
Finally someone speaks the truth and no one ever replied .. for four years.
@FandangoJepZ
4 жыл бұрын
lastmiles delete your damn comment and I will too
@beautifultiger187
4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@johnroscoe2406
4 жыл бұрын
Cute and attractive yes. "Smoking hot?" Ehh...
@DanXDelion
4 жыл бұрын
@@johnroscoe2406 definitely yes!!!
lmao. I found her pretty funny actually. Don't know what sticks some people have up their butts.
@chopun3862
4 жыл бұрын
Microphones record her better than the audience. You can hear laughs, they're just recorded poorly
@Carbon_Crow
4 жыл бұрын
@@chopun3862 A few times you could hear the laugh audience loud and clear but other times you couldn't really hear anything so I don't think that's the case. I did find her jokes funny, though.
@chopun3862
4 жыл бұрын
@@Carbon_Crow you're wrong.
@Carbon_Crow
4 жыл бұрын
@@chopun3862 could you be more specific?
@chopun3862
4 жыл бұрын
@@Carbon_Crow nah just wanted to be obtuse ok KZread. It's quite fun. I see why the trolls do it ...
Seen her give this talk in a different video a while ago. Age hasn't harmed her one bit. Wish I was british so I could be one of her ~26 matches
The scatter plot at 4:20 shows a lot of scatter (duh but there is also a bit of positive correlation. It would be illustrative to see what that correlation value is!
She’s awesome
That Jane Austin Quote best thing on it.
The dealing with problems (lower threshold for negativity) and less divorce reminds me of risk management training I received. The oldest use of not letting the sun go down on your anger is in the Bible: Ephesians 4. According to the 3rd Ed of the Oxford Annotated Bible, that text dates at the latest to the late first century.
If all Ted talkers would be able to comunicate as good as she does I probably would not fall asleep after two minutes
13:01 very important 15:28 continual repair
Start at 15....
@nightshade8958
4 жыл бұрын
Ooops! ten years too late, now I will be eaten by cats and die alone.
The Piers Morgan's wife joke didn't get as many laughs as it should've.
@lvseka
4 жыл бұрын
PC culture
@Sal3600
4 жыл бұрын
@@lvseka I didn't get it. Maybe knowing about the situation helps.
@mrahzzz
4 жыл бұрын
@@lvseka 🙄 No, sounded like she was in America. Fewer Americans are likely to know anything about Piers Morgan, and so fewer people have the context for the joke.
@philipliu4851
3 жыл бұрын
She was talking to a tough crowd
how can you know when you've dated 37 percent of your potential dates?
@hondacivet
7 жыл бұрын
You'd have to pick a year at which you're going to stop dating, and then only go on a certain number of dates per year so you can keep track. So it's not too realistic in practice, haha.
@shanineedwards6894
5 жыл бұрын
Isn't it thirty-seven percent of the time you'd spend dating? Say you start at 15 and you intend to be married at 35. Then at age 21 you should expect to meet the "perfect person"
@kudosbudo
5 жыл бұрын
@@shanineedwards6894 How does that work if you were already married to the perfect person and they passed? And you start again at nearly 40.
@sebastianjost
4 жыл бұрын
@@shanineedwards6894 this assumes a constant rate of dates per year. But in application this theory should only be taken as a rough estimate. That's why physics is actually working most of the time. Absolute precision is not needed most of the time
@mrahzzz
4 жыл бұрын
@@kudosbudo It would apply to your next dating pool - don't include your previous dating pool.
Hannah Fry es una matemática, autora y presentadora de radio y televisión británica. Es profesora de Matemáticas de las Ciudades en el Centro de Análisis Espacial Avanzado de la UCL
Fascinating. Informative and entertaining. She should consider a sideline in stand up comedy as she has good delivery and comic timing! 5 stars *****
@rajinfootonchuriquen
4 жыл бұрын
Matt Parker is a mathematician and also and stand up comedy, if you like to know someone like that.
I liked the end half (guessing coz I married the first guy I dated), but yeah! very interesting.
Love her accent
This is what happen when you date a mathematician, he will put you in one of his equations and integrate you !
@MisterTutor2010
8 жыл бұрын
That joke is so Derivative :-)
@DJcMugaba
7 жыл бұрын
That's the best way to make sure there's no divide between us
I feel like looking for love is a really good place for a satisficer. It seems to me that, in the real world, you would have some sense of a lower bound for a good relationship, and an upper bound for a possible relationship before you start dating. Therefore you would not be limited to comparing each person with those who came before, but you could also reject all those under your lower bound, and stop when you are sufficiently close to the upper bound of what's possible. Throw in some extra rules to handle the possibility that you won't come across someone that close to the upper bound, and maybe throw in some rules for dating in parallel, and I think you have a much more accurate and optimistic model.
Hannah Fry is most beautiful math 'creature' I've ever seen.
the third point was the subject of a Numberphile video.
26 is actually quite a lot, because that number only speaks of women living near him, since that also went into the calculation.
Well, I dont need mathematics to fall in love with this woman...
@andrewsparkes8829
4 жыл бұрын
@TurboCMinusMinus You swallowed a lot of hot air with that red pill...
@DaProHobbit
4 жыл бұрын
TurboCMinusMinus Oh dear, you are truly a very sad existence...
I read the title wrong. I thought it was "the love of mathematics" I was like yeahhh somebody talking about my emotions
Sei molto brava!
that piers morgan wife joke though... SAVAGE!!!. Luv her
3:40 so that is really a point in my favor
Hello there. So I need to write an internal assessment in maths and I’d like to write it on this topic. Do you know some sources I could use? Thank you for your help!
I totally could become straight because Hannah Fry.
@LucasRodmo
7 жыл бұрын
Love u Hannah