Is there any reason to check-call on the river here?

@liyexiang666

3 жыл бұрын

maybe to do charity to him would be a reason

@m.j.hooligan8139

3 жыл бұрын

No, I believe it's best to make the bet. This way you can pick the sizing and feel comfortable with the amount you may have to lay down if he jams. If you check and recently put in $65 on the turn he could toss in a half pot sizing or larger to represent K-X and then you're facing a worst decision.

@diegob7756

3 жыл бұрын

depends on the other guys sizing

@markr8250

3 жыл бұрын

All depends on the villains profile - since balance isn’t our main agenda here. If there are some observant players at the table we may want to strengthen our checking range by check calling sometimes.

@kineahora8736

3 жыл бұрын

What if your read on the villain is he *always* attacks checks and you think he’s more likely to hold a missed heart draw (let’s say J8h) than a 9? Then check-calling makes more money right? I’ve played a lot of 1/2 (meaning I haven’t been improving which is why I’m studying lol) and I think there are players at 1/2 that are very aggressive in this way... Oh, one other note: I once came across a very young pro at 1/2 live in New Orleans (after he took my money he told me he had a podcast that I still listen to). I attempted a small river value bet on him from out of position in a pot where he had 3-bet me preflop from the button. He raised my river and I called off. He later told me my small river value bet was a sizing tell and he knew he had me beat. I know this isn’t the typical 1/2 live story-but it has happened to me!

Bart is almost always spot on about everything. The one thing he says over and over is that people don’t call the flop light when they don’t close the action. In my experience nobody at 1/2 considers anything but their cards and if they think they can hit a hand. They don’t care if 4 people still have to act.

@usurper55

2 жыл бұрын

EXACT same thing i was thinking when i was seeing this video. and im playing 2/5. in 1/2 or 1/3 it will be 10x worse :D

Here’s what I think is most often missed or misunderstood When Bart tells the caller at the beginning thisn is a prime spot for a 3b, and explains all the reasons, 2 limpers, raise from LP, etc. great - all true What many of the callers and presumably listeners don’t seem to grasp is WHY Why not meaning because there’s 2 limps and the raise is from a LP player He partially says the Why when he says his hand benefits going heads up since 10s are so vulnerable As obvious as it might seem, I’d suggest to go another step further and explain to the masses WHY meaning : Over the long run, if you don’t 3 bet these spots and get these hands heads up, ESPECIALLY out of position, your basically set mining with pairs and worse, playing when speculative hands like QJ, you’re setting yourself up to be in really dicey spots or to get stacked when you flop good but not nutted hands, where someone can easily have you out kicked. Or you end up over folding and setting all those preflop calls money on fire. Putting $15 in now to fold or lose 90% of the time vs a 3b to $45 or $60 now and win the pot potentially 60% of the time of you do it in the right spots against the right villains with the right hands and you know how to hand read and identify spots and scenarios. Especially at 1/2, where 3bets are so often only queens plus, you’ll be able to steal more pots taking advantage of your perceived strength of hand (I won’t use the word range - not because 1/2 players don’t understand it ... what they do understand is you 3b so you must have kings or aces) .... that becomes your perceived range to a large portion of the player field As obvious as it may be to Bart in to some people it needs to be spelled out to the masses in the majority who think putting in a 3-bet in the spot is lighting money on fire because they’re putting more money into the pot with a vulnerable hand, but what they’re not understanding is in the long run they are losing money because they would rather call $15 into this part and make it $45 thinking they’re saving $30 but what’s really happening is they’re losing the pot way more often and in many cases they’re going multi way and losing to some Donk who’s playing 95 when he flops two pair and you’re sitting with a vulnerable overpair on a board of 95 deuce

@jeffshackleford3152

4 ай бұрын

Idk tbh, the pocket 10s is a weird spot. Powerful but vulnerable hand. I think flatting 44 or something like that would be good there. With TT 3 bet is likely the play, unless you get no fold equity with a 3 bet pre. Then I would flat, set mine and fold to a bet. Set mining multiway, especially at these stakes is super profitable because people think A pair or A 2 pair is the nuts.

Yea this spot is tricky. I definitely agree with not being results oriented. I play a small home game where this has come up several times. Where someone bets big to get people off of the draws and the draw calls and hits. You cannot be results oriented you made the right play. Value bet your hands especially when you think you are ahead, sometimes you will run into better. That’s just poker. I have learned so much from CLP and studying has payed off. I can say that CLP has made me an even more profitable player. Increase from 1-2 bb to 3-5bb per hour. Still low but I am still learning.

“From you, Bart! I learned it from watching you!”

@sidchuownz

3 жыл бұрын

wholesome as fuck

@alexk-1535

3 жыл бұрын

Underrated comment.

@billhutchinson7831

3 жыл бұрын

Teachers that value-bet thin have children who value-bet thin...any questions?

@WyoPoker

3 жыл бұрын

10/10

Bart apparently underestimates a lot of low stakes players imo if he thinks this guy is “maybe the only guy at these stakes with the ability to value bet here.” There are plenty of decent players at low stakes, just plenty of fish as well.

Enjoyed hearing about this one. Nice. Thanks!

I definitely check back here 100% of the time, so this is a very illuminating hand to review.

i don't like the small bet on the river for the simple fact that we will never be bluffing for this sizing i much rather a large bet to polarize ourself and kind of merge bet as we can have missed flush draws too and want max fold equity when we do.

@bennyzhitomirsky2076

3 жыл бұрын

If we were talking about a 5-10 game, I would agree 100%. In a 1-2 game, however, most opponents don't get to the level of analysis to ask themselves "will he be bluffing with this sizing?". They mostly ask themselves "is my hand strong enough to call this sizing?", and the larger the sizing, the more likely they are to fold a marginal hand.

@pokerqAK47

3 жыл бұрын

No. They play their 2 cards. Almost none of them care if you polarize. Vs an extreme calling st bet larger. Otherwise just half pot it or less

Great lesson

Tank u berry much fer dis

Well I enjoyed this video very much this situation happens a lot at lower stakes but if the stakes are higher and the stacks are deeper the River can be raised and bluffed at what than?

@percyblok6014

2 жыл бұрын

Situational awareness and knowing opponents capabilities. Like was stated, K of hearts is really the only scare card here especially at higher level. You really in a game at higher stake where players are chasing flush draws that hard?

I value own myself all the time but making these thin bets on thr river has gotten me to a 8-13 bb winner at my stakes.

Would it be better to check A9 on river, given having a 9 would sway to him to busted flush draws and 34 suited, check to let him bluff busted draws or just better to get called by worse 9 x.....???? Or do u just go by player type in that scenario?

@CLGilbert

3 жыл бұрын

Who is paying you off when you bet A9 on the river? T9 J9 98 88? Even after the K hits!? I respect that strong hands probably bet the turn but still... This is VERY thin.

there are literraly 11 non bad card for him on the turn like two tens,3*jqk of non heart.which means he sees a bad card like 78% of the time. if hes gonna bet turn, i wonder whats the plan for the 78%? i hope u would do a video on how runouts odds next street should affect your decision this street.

@JMacSD

3 жыл бұрын

Agree, noticed that caller got a lucky run-out, would have liked some discussion on how easily TT with a 2h flop could be beaten on the turn/river. But your count seems inflated, unless a bad card is any that has a chance of putting him behind, but then isn't the river K bad?

@liyexiang666

3 жыл бұрын

@@JMacSD well, k is actually not bad already. he can river a K but its hard. i count those not on whether he will still have the best hand or not. i mean if a card fall, u know u behind because of that card, u know what to do on that card. i count on cards hit villans range in a way that even if he didnt improve its hard for u to get value on such river

@doubleaalanderson4571

3 жыл бұрын

Run out was quite fortunate

@mikehickmanvloggamessingin3604

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah run out was lucky, but would you rather face a J, Q, K, A hitting the turn, with 4,5,6 in hand, or 1 of those cards hitting turn, river with only you and 1 other person in hand. It's more likely that a overcard does not hit the other player when only have 1 other player. But if you have 3,4,5 other players in the hand still, it more likely a overcard hits one of the players So that's why you lead out, to reduce down to either, zero players, 1,2 players, so that either the hand does not continue, and a overcard does not hit, or only up vs 1 other player, when, if a overcard hits If everyone folds, you win a pot. Better to bet, win a pot, then to check, have about a 75% chance to lose the lose the pot with your TT. And if get 1 caller, that's ok. And your not likely to get 3,4,5,6 callers You bet the flop to MERGE, protecting your TT, repping a strong hand, to help with future streets, extracting values making Q9,etc, and Overcards pay too much to either spike their overcard, bluff a overcard. It's kind of the same kind of situation where you hav your already made hand, vs a straight draw, or flush draw. The goal vs draws, is to make it so that either everyone folds, so a flush, or straight doesn't come, or so that they pay too much to hit their draw, and or so that you extract value. So you bet vs the draws to do all of that. Just like you don't want a flush, straight draw to get made, you don't want a overcard to hit, and just like you bet vs that draw, you also bet vs the draw of a overcard hitting, and to extract value, etc. If the overcard hits, you can check call, block bet, small bet, fold, depending on the situation, how many players, your image, etc. It's way easier to play a overcard hitting if your vs 1 player, instead of vs 3,4,5,6 players, and if you rep strength, etc, instead of checking a flop with no Overcards, and then Overcards hitting, with 4,5,6 players, and no perceived strength of your hand, etc If you bet the flop with TT on a 952 board, about 70% of the time your going to win the pot on either the flop, turn, river. If you check the flop with TT, vs a 952 board, with 4,5,6 players in hand, there is about a 70% chance you lose the pot on either the turn or river. So that's why should bet the flop with TT vs 952 with 4,5,6 players

Is it just me or is this about the 5th CLP video in a row with the same message, that you need to make thin value bets on the river (and sometimes lose) to be profitable? Good advice though.

@maximelaurier6902

3 жыл бұрын

Well it takes some time for people to understand

@percyblok6014

2 жыл бұрын

You do know that the latest and greatest poker program that is almost capable of beating a team of seasoned pros, that's one of it's main edges. Thin value bets is where it's at...for now.

Nice hand, sir!

Love the donk bet on flop.

Hate the preflop Flop I’m okay with. I hate that we are betting into a possible minefield because of not charging hands preflop. But given the origination of the preflop raise, we can’t really risk letting it check through. Of course that goes back to playing preflop better Turn is okay. I might bet a bit bigger. River is okay. I would bet larger. I think there’s more value to be had and as Bart alludes, we don’t want to level ourselves into thinking we may have induced spaz.

Hi, I have a question could someone help me please. Bart said on the flop that he would 3 bet with picket tens. What size would he three bet to? What's the olitimal 3 bet size?

@ethanflaherty2286

Жыл бұрын

3x or 3.5x I’d say

Can you explain to me why you don't mind a lead for any amount after flatting pre? When you donk bet usually you have a strong hand or weak pair with a gutter. its check 100% of the time with 10s if you flat pre with 3 players behind you.

@fomori2

3 жыл бұрын

You lead on that board because its unlikely to hit the preflop raisers range and you likely have the best hand here. There is a good chance it gets checked through if you check, unless you are playing with people that cant help themselves and have to bet if checked to. You want to get more money in the pot when you are likely ahead and fold out hands, that could randomly become ahead of you on the turn, that contain weak T's, J's, Q's, K's. I do disagree with Barts 'low sizing' on the donk bet though. This is a low frequency bet and so you should be going with a larger size when you do bet.

@mikehickmanvloggamessingin3604

2 жыл бұрын

77,88,99,TT, AK, AQ, etc, are semi almost semi premium, FLOP VULNERABLE, TURN, RIVER VULNERABLE hands, especially when in 4,5,6 multi way pots. These hands are likely ahead of the other players ranges on a 952 board. The other ranges are either 33, 44, 66, 88, J9, Q9, K9, A9, an or some 5 x, 9 x GARBAGE. And your not likely to be up against a set or 2 pair unless they did the extremely rare of getting lucky, and unless they make 3,4,5 bets postflop, on multiple streets to river, and even then players overvalue, overplay their pair of 9's, etc, 1 pair hands at that 1/2 level. So your 77 to TT, AQ, etc, flop vulnerable hands are likely ahead, beating a 952 board. And so you DONK lead out, bet, even tho it makes you look strong, causes folds, etc, because it PROTECTS your hand from a Turn T, J, Q, K, A, that can easily have you beat. That's about 15 outs that could easily have you beat on turn. So you MERGE PROTECTING your hand, with EXTRACTING value, with MAKING OVER CARDS FLOATERS, J5, Q5, K5, A5, etc, pay to much to spike their overcard, or a overcard, they can bluff on. Betting the flop also gets you to either zero players, heads up, or 3 way, instead of 4,5,6 players, which is good. And if you are reraised then depending on player, situation you either flat call, 4 bet, or fold postflop, altho should only fold to 5,6,7 bet reraise all in. Yeah once in a super great while, lead betting goes against you, but most of the time it's the best thing for a 88 to TT, to do, vs a 952 board. Also you don't have to lead bet every time. You can lead bet about 67% of time, and check about 33% of time, as that balances out your range in that kind of situation.

@why-even-try-brotendo

2 жыл бұрын

You shouldn't do anything like that 100% of the time.

Any merit to jamming the turn? To avoid scare cards if villain has 9x or hearth draw?

@TheGuyCalledX

3 жыл бұрын

No.

@edwardmauer7442

3 жыл бұрын

No, this is wrong thinking. If you jam here you're only getting called by hands that beat you; villain could've easily flopped or turned the set. Secondly you're getting villain to fold hands that you beat rather than having him call a smaller bet and getting value from him. You will get outdrawn on the river sometimes, no biggie. That doesn't mean you must force an end here by taking a bad line.

I like flatting with TT. as played you go to the flop getting 4:1 on your money and makes for a good set-mine. I don't like leading tho. Keep it a cheap set-mine 4 handed.

How are we not feeling the 3 bet but, are feeling the lead into 3 ppl. I'm confused by it.

Is there any room at all for over betting river, say 450

@robertbaynham2193

2 жыл бұрын

Oh Never mine forgot about effectives

The key to increasing your win rate is don't 3-bet, do donk bet, and also go for extremely thin value on the river against a fish in the hope they have one specific hand (A9)? Tbf I do like the thin value bet, though getting shoved on would be painful. In this instance though checking to induce a bluff was probably more likely to have got paid off?

@doubleaalanderson4571

3 жыл бұрын

I'm with you here. I don't think this line pans out very often. Flatting and then leading vs 3 ppl (including the raiser who you were evidently afraid to 3 bet) w/o a set is simply not going to work out most of the time.

@mikehickmanvloggamessingin3604

2 жыл бұрын

Wrong. Bart is right, you guys wrong. 3 betting preflop helps ISO with a Flop, turn, river vulnerable hand. And the donk, lead out bet merges protecting hand from a T,J,,Q,K,A hitting turn, river, and extracting Value, and making Q9, etc, and Overcard floaters pay to much to spike a overcard, or bluffing a overcard, and reducing down to zero, 1,2,3 players, instead of 4,5,6 players. And you can bet 67%, check 33% to merge balancing your range, with why you check. There is a reason why Bart and others who 3 bet preflop with TT in this kind of situation, and leads out to n this kind of situation, and thin value bets river 67%, checks 33%, etc, why they are more profitable then you guys over the long term, unless you guys are extremely lucky The logic, reasons, etc, are against you, and you don't have the long term results, and you don't have the credibility, logic, etc, and you don't explain why, etc Your just flat wrong.

Going through the ways in which V can have a K, why not K9 suited?

@chico4661

3 жыл бұрын

I was thinking this too. The other holdings I would see here is A5 suited hits middle pair still has good equity with an ace and sees another car for turned trips.

@williamr4053

3 жыл бұрын

I see a lot of Kx suited hands here that flop the second nut draw and continue, only to end up with top pair on the river and beat out TT and JJ often. This is one of those boards where TT and JJ are overs to the board, but that also doesn’t mean other players don’t have suited or non suited over cards that they are floating with as well. I’ve seen more TT hands get rivered in this spot than actually being good.

Are there not enough missed FD's in villain's range here to check river and let him bluff? Seems like there might be a similar amount of missed flush draws as other 9x hands (98, 97)

@michaelserrate3032

3 жыл бұрын

I agree with you, Neil. What the caller didn’t say (but probably believed) is that the villain wasn’t likely to bluff many (or any) of his busted draws but would call with a lot of his 9x hands. It seems to me that a lot of this really came down to player profile which wasn’t mentioned much during the call.

@nicks210684

3 жыл бұрын

@@michaelserrate3032 yeah I agree there wasn’t enough analysis of that. The villain limp called preflop so it depends what we think his limp-calling range is. There’s 3 combos of A9s, 3 combos of 89s, 1 combos of T9s. That’s 7 combos. For busted flush draws there’s QJs, QTs, JTs, 87s, 76s and maybe some Axs hands (since if he can have A9s it seems reasonable that he could have other). So I think it’s close. But also, he limp-called preflop, called flop and called turn. So he seems like a passive player. So it seems like betting to target 9x is better than checking to try and induce hearts.

Were you agreeing or summarizing to elicit a response? Sounded like you questioned his plays and then said you would not have made that move.

preflop was mediocre, on the flop was mediocre, the turn was pretty mediocre and the river was very mediocre. Good hand.

@percyblok6014

2 жыл бұрын

Donking the flop was the best play in this hand. SMFH.

Isn't this betting line, and the use of those sizings inherently unbalanced? Do you ever bluff using these sizings and with which holding? Is it always played bet-fold or bet-call and if so, isn't that heavily exploitable? Good players adjust to thin value betting, by raising thin for value in return.

@noex100

3 жыл бұрын

In 1-2 NLH, players rarely punish you for playing exploitative. At 2-5 and above you're right; they will adjust quickly and you'll have to rebalance.

@DominationRotation

3 жыл бұрын

@@noex100 People always say 1/2/, 1/3 live players are all novices who don't understand the game. I live in Germany and there is a lot of young and tough competition, even at the low stakes games, so I can't really relate to your statement. They take the game very serious, play and study ALOT. I have the feeling people who'd play that line, would get pounced on.

@noex100

3 жыл бұрын

@@DominationRotation Look, I've played 1/2 and 1/3 all over America (so perhaps it's different over there) and very few players are "tough competition" at those stakes. The vast majority will, at a minimum, never make a huge bluff on the river. You'd think people would punish exploitative play but they don't at 1/2. That's why it's so easy at that level and why guys like Bart implicitly recommend exploitative strategies so often.

@DominationRotation

3 жыл бұрын

@@noex100 Fair enough. I'd rather implement some of this in a homegame where there are a lot of recreational gamblers, but in a reg filled casino, this seems a little off. But what do I know, Bart's the crusher 😅

The flat preflop genuinely hurt me

I hate pocket 10’s. Glad to see someone win with them for once. Lol

No. I play $1/2in Vegas and I VB this nearly all the time, But I think you do have to check river vs the OMC types playing regular, long hours for Diamond Status who infest some Caesars properties (usually during afternoons/early evenings). Most will never call any bet with 2nd pair, regardless of how the hand played.

Cha'alt!

Re the thumbnail: Bart! Stop hoarding all of the chips!

Why can’t villain have AKh here?

Lol Bart discussing this hand like a genius play. Calls pre to set mine oop inviting 2 other players. Doesn’t see a ten, decides to donk bet. River bet is way too small. River play would be good if he bets like 120. Bottom line this play works vs weak calling stationy opponents and those make the majority of live players so it’s fine

@adamhammond9985

2 жыл бұрын

3 things: -Bart said “I don’t hate the donk bet,” that doesn’t mean he thinks it’s optimal -Bart said he thinks the river bet was too small -Bart makes it very explicit that this advice is for exploiting weak low stakes players

This is an obvious bet on the river.

Terrible on all streets. Your range is capped. TT doesn't bet into an uncapped range on 259. Better to lead boards like 456 or 367 where you can have some semblance of nut advantage. Assuming we can have a fish flatting range in sb, you're repping middle/bottom set and some nfd bluffs on the flop, like Ah2h, but since these hands are better to xr, a competent opponent will raise you every time because most fish will lead for 'protection' with the exact kind of hand you have. The reason you would probably xr hands like sets is to give AIR hands like KQ a chance to bluff. When you lead you're screaming "I want KQ to fold, I don't have a set I really don't!" Also, your flop sizing is way too big. You said you've been studying. You need to start from square one. Upswing poker isn't a bad idea.

@jacktatryan6878

3 жыл бұрын

reading this makes me never want to play poker. holly fuck.

@well.thy.one.

3 жыл бұрын

@@jacktatryan6878 lol

I hope the trooper is watching this. He is losing tons of money playing 1-2 NLH live

@hornetguy9063

3 жыл бұрын

Someone crunched the numbers on 2+2 (I saw it cross linked on Reddit), that TheTrooper97 won like $20k in his first three years of living in vegas. Given how many hours he plays, that’s basically breaking even at live 1/2. Does he still only show table b roll and not actually go over any hands? I’d imagine he’d be torn a new one by many viewers for many plays he makes

@samlogers8805

3 жыл бұрын

@@hornetguy9063 For some time I summed up the running losses for the year in the comment section. Got a lot of hate for it. I Think I did 2017 to 2019. One year he made 10k profit but the next break even and the last year negative. He almost never goes over hands and when he does it sounds very unprofessional and almost confused. He did go over some hands a few weeks ago then he lost 1.2k at 1-2NLH and he did some huge mistakes. He basically plays 2005 florida home game ACB poker and hasn't evolved since as he is too aggorant for accepting coaching as he is the best in his mind.

@hornetguy9063

3 жыл бұрын

Sam Rogers yeah I see that attitude often. I see tons of dudes who have gigantic leaks who can win at poker still, mostly because they can actually accurately assess their skill level (if you’re making $12/hr at $1/$3, you probably aren’t Tom Dwan circa 2009). So rather than “mix it up”, they play their flawed but disciplined game plan and do okay. And usually slowly learn. A Freedom25 video of him playing HU FL (may still be on KZread) gave me a great quote to live by in poker: “if I can’t tell you why I’m winning, I’m probably not”. I like TheTrooper97 as a person, but he’s definitely the type of person who will see a game and go “aw man that game is so good, I’d crush it”. But if pressed on the why, he’d totally conk out and not have a reason. Somehow when he cold calls a raise with T7s in the small blind, he’s playing it so much better than the rest of the table who cold calls T7s in the small blind. I can only imagine what his 2020 was like, with covid locking down the rooms for months, and returning to find games almost exclusively played by locals (versus tourists who are likely far worse on average). It’s hilarious to compare his vlog to, say, Andrew Neeme, who is actually a smart and serious professional poker player, and how much better Andrew has always been at explaining what he does. Of course one can use them as a teaching tool: watch how the guy who can comfortably beat 5/10 talks and thinks and finds important in poker, and compare to the guy who breaks even at 1/2

@karlseastrand7678

3 жыл бұрын

@@hornetguy9063 I have played with him a few times. Defo a winning player (at $1/2) and 20K in 3 years sounds about right. Don't think he plays a ton and not late with all the real drunks either. I doubt he is betting TT on river in this spot.

@karlseastrand7678

3 жыл бұрын

@@samlogers8805 I don't think it is arrogance. I just think he is happy cruising along, not grinding the hours and defo not talking strategy. Some people are just wired that way. Each to their own. He has always seemed a nice guy to me and it is his choice whether he wants to put in the time and effort to improve. Although I am always going over hands some people are just not interested. I'm actually very glad everyone doesn't approach poker the way I do and you should be too.

this is one hand analysis I really disagree with, at least from a theory perspective; DONKBETS. Leading is terrible on any board. Typically all you do is make worse hands fold and better hands call, OR RAISE. I make a living raising donkbets like this. What can "hero" in this circumstance do? Sure I could have a flush draw (which will usually have 2 overcards and is the favorite anyway), i could also have all of the overpairs and sets! You literally have to fold every time you lead on a board like this if someone raises you, and THATS why donkbetting is universally bad.

@doubleaalanderson4571

3 жыл бұрын

I like a check raise/check call depending on the bet size/player. Leading here is so brutal vs a raise or on a variety of run outs. The worst is when you lead here and get 2 callers which, happens at low stakes a lot lol. Then the vast lion's share of run outs are going to be awful. Either 3 bet and bet the flop or flat and check the flop imo. It doesn't make sense to not 3 bet but, then be like "Oh I got it now. Let me lead into three ppl."

With a pair and an over out there, at 1-2 9X 100% thinks he’s calling for a chop.

He thinks he studied...?

Bart, have you ever been to the gym?

Stop calling in hands where you don’t know what the opponent had

@pokerqAK47

3 жыл бұрын

Lol what. Who cares. I can tell you 100% he had 9x.

@nicks210684

3 жыл бұрын

@@pokerqAK47 lol yeah what else could he have? He’s calling three streets with 66-88? 😂

BE LCUKY LIKE YOU NEED TO BE IN ENY turnaments !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!poker is like backgammon you are not better thant you luck

I'm sorry, but these videos are so hard to watch.

this is over exaggerating, over explaining a basic simple poker game.