The Internet Is Wrong About The Divine Feminine
Perennialist and polytheist Georgina Rose sits down to discuss how the internet is lying about what the divine feminine actually is and why it needs to exist with a metaphysical context to have meaning.
COME ON A TRIP WITH ME TO INDIA:
trovatrip.com/trip/asia/india...
SUPPORT ME (AND KEEP THE CONTENT COMING!):
www.patreon.com/daatdarling?f...
ko-fi.com/daatdarling
@daatdarling on venmo
BOOK A TAROT READING:
Send an email to daatdarlingcontact@gmail.com
CONNECT WITH ME ON OTHER PLATFORMS:
www.threads.net/@daatdarling
/ daatdarling
/ daatdarling
www.tiktok.com/@daatdarling?_...
/ daatdarling
t.me/daatdarlingfeed
odysee.com/@daatdarling
daatdarling.substack.com
Пікірлер: 127
Concepts of masculinity and femininity has been absolutely hammered as part of this post modernism era. Tons of people trying to find their ass with both hands but dont know what a cheek feels like due to the political weaponization. I hope videos like this can help people fix their compasses so they can find things like truth and fact again. Still looking to get your book. Any updates on it?
You can be gnostic Christian and have a relationship with the divine feminine after all that's what barbelo and the holy Spirit is
@james192599
Ай бұрын
Whats the point. Their are so many better goddesses than sophia
@NfindaMalongo
Ай бұрын
@@james192599 and what's the point of having better anything?
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
@@james192599blasphemy
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
Blasphemy
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
@@james192599 blasphemy and take it back take all you've done wrong to women back and nature if your yapping bout the air that dgafboutU
I try having a social life, but all my friends died. Fantastic video, though.
@user-ey7im5ss5v
Ай бұрын
?
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
Wrong decision no matter how bad you think is all bad when you make it past 21 of you grew up in democrats cities where white folks don't cry for daily school stuff yall fake cry about for
@d34nroad
Ай бұрын
ill be your friend
This was cathartic! Everything that I've been noticing and was being frustrated about is encapsulated in this video
There’s many shadow possessed walking these streets, we need to reconnect to the divine and be serious with our practices and pursuits of Gnosis.
Divine = GOD. People are forgetting the healing part. It's an overall elevation of the spirit in alignment to source.
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
G-D blasphemy Hashem or Elshaddai and maybe Elohim depending on the content and context
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
You just changed my vocabulary it all makes sense now minus daat being my sister
really informative, always impressed with your intellect
FINALLY someone had to make this video, and I'm glad it was you. Btw, can I suggest a video on how to invoke planetary intelligences? It's a shame that I can't find reliable online resources on that
@formerdungeonmaster1232
Ай бұрын
The Esoteric Cross dips into this a bit but the nitty gritty of it is paywalled
@sibillaaudios
Ай бұрын
@@formerdungeonmaster1232 better than nothing! Thanks
I always love when your content takes the time to go back to roots and basics. I don’t know if you’ll see this comment, or if you have any control over the ads that play during your videos, but I wanted to make you aware that political ads asking for monetary donations are showing up. Your content is not typically political, and this ad in particular was in support of Trump which I would not be happy with if it was one of my videos
YESSSSSS love channels like yours One of a kind ❤✨️
This is why I love your channel because you're always talking about the real stuff not any fluff vapid uneducated not practiced knowledge
I dig your actual scholarship, Darling. So much fluff these days with all the amplification and easy copies. Thank you.
I should say how much I appreciate you for the work you do ❤
Really appreciated your point about whole community infrastructure being more true to a traditional ethos.
From my understanding from Stephanie South of the Foundation for the Law of Time; the Divine Feminine has a main attribute, which is that being a distinct difference from the old spiritual path paradigm of denial and asceticism, to that of a paradigm that holds space for sacred sexuality, or tantra. There are many other aspects that correlate to this fractal of distinction but this seems to be the main essence of the difference from what I have been told. I am curious to watch the rest of your video to see if I am correct. Much love. In Lak’Ech
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
Can you leave my land I don't wanna go back to MX
I've been trying to understand the position of Western women through the lens of female divinity. I would attribute seduction to femininity, but I may be biased as a straight man. The Romans had Eros as a god of seduction, which resembles a prepubescent boy. But generally women are widely regarded as the fairer sex, in terms of physical beauty, charm, grace, sensuality. There are feminine archetypes or Goddesses, corresponding with eroticism, seduction, fertility. They may have different names and attributes in different cultures, but often refer to the same or similar core aspects, and can sometimes even be considered the same entity under different names and manifestations. Take for example Venus, Selene, Ishtar, Inanna, among others, asociated with the feminine power of seduction, fertility, and more. Women have had recognized divine powers in history across different cultures, but this was banned under Abrahamic rule. As such, in acts of defiance, Satanic sects would hold Black Masses to mock everything the Church held sacred. Female priestesses would lead orgies and sometimes perform sacrifices. Where paganism was persecuted and outlawed, satanism took its place. Priestesses predate Christianity, and it is rumored that there were such things as "temple prostitutes", which would perform tantric rituals to allow for a transcendent experience. In modern times in the West, the position of women has been marginalized and the notion of their divinity is overlooked, denied or ridiculed. At the same time, there has never been such easy and widespread access to the worship of femininity through the internet. One might say that the decline of Christianity, the rise of atheism, and the sudden exponential rate of abundance of lewd material, is the work of a Goddess taking back her place in the hearts and minds of Western men. Lust has been demonized and shamed, while it can be a profound way to celebrate and worship the attraction of polar opposites of male and female. There is power in lust, and who is to say that the Goddess of Babylon, once regarded as the Queen of Heaven, who through her own wit, charm and resolve was worshipped in the oldest civilizations of mankind as the most high, is not taking back her power, through seduction? While she was once worshipped by perhaps hundreds of thousands, she can now reach billions. Never have men given so much power and worship to femininity. Not to females: it happens in secret, and they worship pixels, but have screens not become modern Temples, and the women who gain immense wealth by advertising the image of their femininity, are they not the modern equivalent of Qadishtu, the temple priestesses and sacred harlots? Through equivalent exchange, the power of men is reduced, and it is siphoned to women. Indeed, in some Western countries, we now see female ministers of Defense! Ishtar was also the Goddess of War, protecting her people and guiding them to victory. Sorry for rambling. Maybe I am insane but I am curious about your take on these unprecedented developments. Am I seeing things right, or is it all the work of demonic powers looking to destroy the fabric of society?
I've always considered western concepts of "Femininity" to be on the Sephira of Netzach, which is Venus, and "Masculinity" to be with Geburah, which is Mars. Venus / Femininity is on the Pillar of Mercy, the Divine Male. Mars / Masculinity is on the Pillar of Severity, the Divine Female. I always found how these mix to be interesting.
Thanks for teaching me a new word: hypergamy.
This is so true about everything. You have this microcosm which links individuals together in a sort of network. This network is held together by an idea, principal, etc, which is transcendent in nature. Within the microcosm there is stratification, those that only interact with this idea on a libidinal or material level, then at the top there are those like yourself who have really integrated this concept and attained “mastery” of it. I think this issue of never having people on the same page will always result in misunderstandings or profanations of metaphysical ideals. What do you think? Is this condition just built into the nature of reality?
i remember reading a tweet that said something along the lines of “those who are tapped into their (true) rahu will be laughed at by those who pretend to be tapped into rahu just to end up consumed by him in the end & the tables turn leading to those who are genuinely taped into their *healthy* rahu to laugh” to add to the whole metaphorical never going mainstream idea
I agree so much with this. If we don't develop a healthy relationship to both the The Divine Masculine and The Divine Feminine, we do develop a more fractured and fragmented state of being that becomes harder to live in and heal from, and harder to connect to The Divine itself. The deeper we get to the true Divine Masculine/Divine Feminine, stronger is our connection to The Divine Source, and it shows how far disconnected the world is from it in this day and age.
I love your vids but NGL loved the long hair :(
She is pissed! Royally pissed!
I think as a man Ive seen a frustrating parallel with this in the whole 'alpha male' movement.
❤
@An_Egregore
Ай бұрын
Ehem, That is to say... I agree with almost everything that's been said. When I work on projects trying to speak to or in respect of what I think are manifestations of a transcendent feminine force/identity, I find that my work becomes begrudgingly abstract. Representing the pervasiveness of her presence, but also to identify her in concrete terms has proven difficult. I guess, for many people, the natural assumption is that to speak with less specificity means to speak with less accuracy. On the other hand by expressing my thoughts about how she chooses to be observed specifically, it might be easy to assume that I'm speaking only to set of physical traits or limitations, which is obviously problematic. It's hard to explain the difference between analogy and synecdoche. It's even harder to understand "nothing" as spaceless motion, and so limitless potential, and, furthermore, how that descends into reality as feminine, and is reflected internally in humanity... But why cast shade on the new age crowd. I can see some loose connections between the Moonchild stuff and a lot new age spiritualism, but I'm not super knowledgeable thing on how that whole babalon business came about...
You can end the title at "The Internet Is Wrong" and it'll be perfectly accurate.
@nigeriaroberts678
Ай бұрын
Yeah but wouldn't someone on the Internet, saying the Internet is wrong, make for a huge logical paradox🤔🤷
@TheGreenKnight500
Ай бұрын
@@nigeriaroberts678 Yes (insert Chad meme here)
@ryank6322
Ай бұрын
I'd replace it with "Humans are cancer".
Thanks for the share sister 🌹 Be well ✝️
@james192599
Ай бұрын
Ah yes the religion that asserts one God and everything else is a demon
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
Sister OK...cross blasphemy
Shalom Georgina, I learn and follow the Torah, and also study the Kabbalah. I have wondered about something for many years, and you seem to have a good knowledge of the history of magick. It seems from my limited understanding that most modern occultist are using the Names of Hashem as part of their rituals. Ancient Egypt is the source of all magick from my understanding. Have you ever seen in your research if the Ancient Egyptians also used the 10 Names of Hashem connected to the 10 Sefirot in their magical rituals?
@NoOneAtAll-bz3zb
Ай бұрын
ברוכה הבאה אחות. אני אוהב ומברך אותך לנצח, אני אחיך וגם לומד קבלה. נכון שכדי לבצע אפילו קסם גויים חייבים לשאוב כוח מאלוהינו. כדי אפילו להבין את היקום, עליהם להתאים תחילה את אמונותיהם האליליות הכוזבות לספירות הקדושות של אלוהינו, שכן הקבלה של אלוהינו שוכנת בכל הדברים. מהמחקר האישי שלי לקסם יש את מקורו בשומר העתיקה עם חנוך הקדוש, ועבר למצרים בתקופת השושלת הראשונה.
@LaiviShor
Ай бұрын
@@NoOneAtAll-bz3zb אני איש לא אישה. אני יודע ה׳ הוא האלקים אין עוד מלבדו. שבת שלום.
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
Blasphemy
@Thewizardandthehermit
Ай бұрын
@@Learnedit4mewho are you to call blasphemy ?
@Learnedit4me
Ай бұрын
@Thewizardandthehermit well longstory short your people and there dads and uncles and even some xbbr excuse my script......they say ..wow you studied kaballa ir know kaballa and I'm like no I only read torah and follow sorry "follow" bereshit and iyov......and the Lord thy God and the LORD Gaaaaad sorry Hashem elohim R like can you please do shabbat and not eat non kosher tho it says kosher and not do the stuff Christians mystics wrote so we can have the tribe saying but Isaiah 53!!!!!
Soft life is best life..42 is the number of it
How do transgender people relate to the divine feminine?
@brandonmcalpin9228
Ай бұрын
Well.. they don’t.. technically, women have the divine masculine within their psyche known as the Animus, while men have the divine feminine known as the Anima. It’s a psychological construct within the minds of all of us. Transgender is likely an over identification with this construct. But this is just my opinion, take it for what it’s worth
@jae.tewhare.
Ай бұрын
anyone of any gender can relate to the divine feminine in their own ways.
@odinthomas2634
Ай бұрын
Perversion of the primordial androgenous
I swear you remind me of a mix of Lydia from Beetlejuice and Sabrina from Chilling Adventures 😌
@BLMacab
Ай бұрын
I want her to be my wife....along with 49 korean Godesses and a few hebrew women
@josiahsophia8938
Ай бұрын
Vibes
I'm obsessed with your top. It's so pretty 🌼
You make some valid points but I always start to give some side-eye when I hear someone say "I'm doing it the way it's supposed to be done." Even within perennialism, there are many different paths and possibilities. There's far more than one philosophy of metaphysics and the idea that everyone needs to conform to the same one (in this case, the god/goddess paradigm) is very strange to me. I especially disagree with the idea that men and women (and masculinity/femininity) have separate archetypes. The perspective you're presenting sounds very gender essentialist to me, and I see a great deal of room for queerness in metaphysics, philosophy, and spirituality that you don't acknowledge. Again, you have some valid points, especially about the commodification and reduction of the complexity of womanhood and femininity, but it seems to me that you're engaging in a different kind of reduction.
@markopregelj7113
Ай бұрын
She is speaking from classical metaphysical perspective.... not a material one, classic or otherwise. Gender and queerness are material forms, that as she put "have moving goal posts'. Which is precisely the point. That there is a conflation with the material and the metaphysical as well as a misunderstanding of what the divine feminine is. I will agree that the topic on people embodying and working with both divine feminine and masculine (regardless of material gender) is not brought up here and is an important part of many traditions and waves of thought... as can be seen, for example, in the alchemical Unificato, and in the practice of Vadjrayogini. Certainly there are representations of gods thats change gender or are both but these also are hinting at nondual notions more than affirming material conditions of gender and sexuality. These internal practices are to marry the seeming dicotomy in ourselves and overcome the daulistic vision of the world. All that is to say that energy, power, magic are not and can not be straight or queer regardless if their feminine, masculine, or nutural quality. They are certainly beyond that.
@TenguXx
Ай бұрын
@@markopregelj7113 What is it you consider classical metaphysics? Platonism, Neoplatonism, Aristotelianism, Hermeticism, something else? None of these are identical; they all have nuance that can't be reduced to a single viewpoint. And why should Western philosophies be the only ones considered? For example, a lot of people in the West consider masculinity active and femininity passive, but if you look at Indian philosophy, that pattern is reversed. Since Da'at Darling describes herself as a perennialist, both systems should be equally valid. I also take issue with statements like the microcosm and macrocosm being "the root of all metaphysics," because the truth is that it's the root of a particular philosophy of metaphysics from a particular culture. More importantly, this video engages in exactly the conflation of the material and the metaphysical that you say it's arguing against. If gender is strictly material, why does Da'at Darling say that all women are "intrinsically linked to the Divine Feminine"? She's using the paradigm of the microcosm and macrocosm to argue a link between the material and the metaphysical that you're not acknowledging. Moreover, I strongly disagree with the idea that queerness is material, and I also disagree with the statement that it has moving goal posts. Queerness encompasses everything that lies outside heteronormative assumptions, and so I would consider all of the traditions you mentioned to be queer, or at least to contain queerness. This video describes a metaphysics founded in heteronormativity, so saying that metaphysics can be beyond that doesn't make sense.
@markopregelj7113
Ай бұрын
@@TenguXx the arrguement that these systems arent the same is moot. Many of them use similar structures and archetypes to engage the individual. Most people can make an easy link in that macro/micro but its use is not literal. for example lets say such as in the 2nd hand of IFA initiation. They say you become the wife of IFA (no one says you become a woman if you are man. its not a gender thing and you arent gay or trans for being the wife of IFA.. Or straight if a Lesbian were to take the rights... As they are not closed to women) and spending set time inside as if to mimic the post nuptials consummation. The analogy is pretty obvious. You are taking on the receptive principle to become impregnated with IFA. As I pointed at, these practices arent challenging heteronormativity (unless we are expanding to heteronormativity to just mean normativity. certainly there are practices that use nonheteronormativity to challange normativity in general but are not doing so make people question sexuality but their constraints of perceived reality) in the sense that they are not interested in heterosexuality are any other form of sexuality for that matter. Where sex or sexuality comes into play, its roll is generative as basic procreative force is by nature. While Yoruba may not be "normal" or classic (as i think you are suggesting my notion of classical means greco roman) in a modern western perspective it is most certainly one the great classical traditions. As far as queerness... what it means today isnt what it meant 20 years ago let alone 100 or before. The defiinition has become more and more vague and inclusive. There are a myriad things considered queer that would not have made the cut at one point in time or another. It is to a degree a reflection of society or at least aspects the society. For that matter both heteronormality has looked different over time, as well as what is generally thought of as normal. None of which have any bearing on the function of the soul or the truth of existence. Sexuality, as experienced by the individadual in the material plane is an act (including that a thought/thinking is still an act of sorts) of expressing a corporeal desire. Presicely because we are so drawn and motivated by it that it can be yoked to other means. I do concede that she falters with her point when saying "intrinsically linked to the Divine Feminine". Georgiana does fall trap to her owe critic. She does not score 10 out 10 on the debate.
You're gonna tell us that back in ancient Grece, women weren't at home keeping the house and the children ?
When one reads the Hadiths for the first time: Ayisha get her menses and is sad😢 Islamic Gnostics lol
Part of the reason I’m here is to admire how ridiculously cute this woman is 😍
Horus in Babalon.
Did they Divine Feminine inspire you to purloin the belt of Orion from feline celestial amicus and obfuscate your roachy insides?
I’m a woman and I’m here! I really value everything you say. I think this hit the nail on the head. Thank you!❤
@Misskittywitch8176
Ай бұрын
Agreed
Gracias 🙏🏻
Surely all men have some aspect of divine feminine in them? As women have aspects of the divine masculine? Without which there can be no true balance, Middle Pillar.
@brandonmcalpin9228
Ай бұрын
According to Jung, yes. Men have the divine feminine in them, the Anima, women have the divine masculine within them, the Animus. It’s like a phantasm within the psyche.. “a ghost woman you love more than any living woman. You project this onto your partners..” according to Jung. Same applies to women.
@diggy_the_first
Ай бұрын
@@brandonmcalpin9228 Do you think the 'ghost woman' in your mind is like a Tulpa or Egregore or is it a construct in your mind?
@brandonmcalpin9228
Ай бұрын
@@diggy_the_first I think Egregore is most accurate. Or an archetype within the collective unconscious. It’s part of the Shadow, according to Jung. It’s like a bridge between yourself and the unconscious. Jung attributes to the Anima(feminine in every man) as such: Manifestations of the Anima: 1) “The Furrow”, receptive generative power 2) Mary, the mother of the divine child 3) Helen of Troy, sensual femininity or Siren 4) Sophia, the Gnostic goddess of wisdom. I’ve experienced all of these at different times and have projected these on to my partners at different times lol. Idk how accurate this is.. I suspect Jung might’ve had Narcissistic Personality Disorder which would explain this, which would explain me as well. Sam Vaknin describes the same thing and he’s a Narcissist. So the real question is.. does this make sense to any of you guys? 😂
@diggy_the_first
Ай бұрын
@@brandonmcalpin9228 It's very thought provoking, thank you.
@brandonmcalpin9228
Ай бұрын
@@diggy_the_first no problem
Needed to be said.
Hail to the Goddesses of all nations! May They be properly worshipped by Their peoples once again!
as someone who is very attached to the divine feminine, im so glad theres a good defense of it out now
Very much agreed. A lot of young women engage with the divine feminine out of rejection/aversion to our masculine dominated culture, which results in an unbalanced approach that ultimately reinforces that culture. The relationship between the divine masculine and feminine is the relationship between matter and energy or awareness and reality. The best way to love Kali is to be Shiva.
This subject could be elaborated on more And broken down more I’d love to see that
I never thought I'd ever hear trad wives compared to sirens.
🌭❤🍩
Are there any people who have taken this idea of the matter/pattern relationship of different gods and interpreted it as distinct subjects within a singular god?
@walkialyon8507
Ай бұрын
Yes, old religions, particularly Hinduism, basically believe this. The problem with doing that is it creates a very confusing and self conflicting god.
@persilis
Ай бұрын
@@walkialyon8507 okay maybe I just need to finally read the vedas and puranas. I am familiar with the proto indo-european ideas of the sky father and earth mother and its influence on bronze age religion, but I’m kinda looking for more modern metaphysics.
@BLMacab
Ай бұрын
@@persilisetymology has all the answers
Did the Divine Feminine inspire you to join an alliance with RW political activists and participate in felony crimes?
@waskerbasket9601
Ай бұрын
Wtf are you on about, bot?
@DaatDarling
Ай бұрын
Psychosis
@HEADSPACES
Ай бұрын
@DaatDarling keep gaslighting and running from the truth every time someone comes forward. Your little "Radical Middle Path" club's actions will be exposed to sunlight, and justice.
@Dezzreck
Ай бұрын
@@HEADSPACES how about explaining what you’re on about instead of speaking so vaguely
@user-ze3tq9hf9i
Ай бұрын
@@HEADSPACES Left-wing schizophrenic resentment
Women = Maya
With all love , that haircut is not working for you.
@KL-yg3ii
Ай бұрын
I beg to differ 🤨🙄
@captcurly
Ай бұрын
That’s just like, your opinion man. It definitely works. 🤷 With all love, keep it to yourself.
@danielbetancourt1483
Ай бұрын
It's cute
@lisemzarate4029
Ай бұрын
I think you meant it's not working for You
@waskerbasket9601
Ай бұрын
I think it’s fine. Her hair. Psst