The irony of the BBC calling out fake news.

@Itjaylamarie

Ай бұрын

Is not fake

@alchemY.420

Ай бұрын

@@Itjaylamarieit is but remain in the dark if it suits your denial of reality better.

Never went.

@Ricardo_Lima35

5 ай бұрын

Never went. Can you prove that?

@joeferraro5495

Ай бұрын

@@Ricardo_Lima35can you prove we did? Because I’m convinced we didn’t

@Ricardo_Lima35

Ай бұрын

@@joeferraro5495 can you prove we did? *Yes.* Because I’m convinced we didn’t *That's not my business.*

@joeferraro5495

Ай бұрын

@@Ricardo_Lima35 so we can’t go now and you really believe all the bs. All of the videos pictures look phony as hell. Elon said it would take 8 fuel trips to go to the moon but that wasn’t necessary in 1969 for some reason. Do a little investigating

@joeferraro5495

Ай бұрын

Sure can’t be enough of the facts speak massive fraud

SIMPLY A LIE

No man has ever landed on moon

@redjack7296

10 ай бұрын

Nice Grammer

@maxamahnken7325

9 ай бұрын

Man ----- landed upon the Moon

@Roxasamico

7 ай бұрын

@@redjack7296 it's spelt Grammar if you're going to get petty.

@redjack7296

7 ай бұрын

@@Roxasamico Spain, Britain, and Australia confirmed a signal from the moon. What's the excuse for this one.

@Roxasamico

7 ай бұрын

@@redjack7296 You've just ignored everything I said. They confirmed a signal? What do you mean? I already alluded to why whatever they're confirming can't be taken at face value. Do you get conned often? I imagine you're an extremely easy mark for scams.

I will bet my life that these fakers never did, nor ever, will land on the noon. I will be delighted to be proven wrong.

@steviewonder7495

Жыл бұрын

Well Putin will soon prove to you soon, that America ran like kids from Vietnamese villagers and lost the war That Americans sobbed about the twin towers for ten years solid That when Putin unleashes his 6500 hypersonic nuclear warheads on you then you will get to the moon in a few minutes.

@maxasaurus3008

11 ай бұрын

Not sure how one could land on noon but don’t worry: we’re all a little crazy.

@maskonfilteroff3145

11 ай бұрын

No you won't be. You'll dismiss it and pretend it never happened, as you likely already have.

@billleyland128

11 ай бұрын

@@maskonfilteroff3145 I do not ''pretend'' it never happened, I have weighed up the evidence, seen all the footage, listened to the pros and cons, and arrived at a logical decision. I have been called a conspiracy theorist when the real conspiracy theorists are those who subscribe to the biggest conspiracy theory of all time, the one perpetrated by NASA on the people of the world. Would you be willing to bet your life on the promise made by NASA that they will ''return'' in 2025?? I think not.

@white_heat.truth76

11 ай бұрын

You will never be proven wrong. Men cannot land on a source of light. Chances are the crooked USG had top secret missions to orbit the body in order to collect data which they do not want the public to know. NASA is a black budget operation which collects taxpayer money to finance secret air & military operations. Operation Fishbowl was all the proof needed to confirm man cannot exceed a low Earth orbit, so in other words we're trapped within the friendly environs of the firmament. To this day no one knows the dimensions of this place. I estimate it's a whole lot bigger than what is being peddled. I'll wager there is other land masses which are clearly off limits in accordance to the polar treaties. Captains Franklyn & Cooke charted over 44,000 miles of Earth before they had to turn back for obvious reasons. The data returned from the floating ice stations of the 1800's are still top secret to this day. Admiral Byrd left us some clues aside of the disastrous Operation High Jump, but the lack of available data & insufficient evidence leaves the case wide open.

How did we have the technology I'm the 60s and 70s but we don't now. In 2022

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

We had the Saturn V rocket in the 60s, the only rocket ever built capable of lifting an Apollo-sized spacecraft into lunar orbit. Congress killed the Saturn program when they shut down Apollo, and diverted funding to such things as "studies of left handed monkeys and their effect on Berkley campus life", with a pittance left over for the shuttle and othe NASA programs. Without the Saturn or an equivalent, NOBODY is sending men to the moon or beyond.

@kitcanyon658

Жыл бұрын

You going to strap yourself into a 60 yr old machine? Enjoy...

@thechroniclegamer4285

Жыл бұрын

We do have the technology, we just didn’t have a Need and then the technology at the time became outdated

@thechroniclegamer4285

Жыл бұрын

@s 3 what do you mean?

@macalister8881

Жыл бұрын

​@@thechroniclegamer4285 nope the moon dust is highly magnetic , very toxic and radioactive any zipper would jam , the dust would have got inside the craft in their eyes and caused major irritation , watering eyes and blisters that is just 1 type of equipment they still need to this day

So the media has been lying for nearly 200 years (probably longer) and we still believe them 🤣!

@manuqtix8874

Жыл бұрын

You know what the messed up thing is? These people unquestionably believe in a book written by primitive desert dwelling goatherds as being factual But approach the moon landing with the most amount of skepticism ever The irony is overwhelming

@drillatrillaofficial8069

Жыл бұрын

King Selassie I is the only one who appears in the moon even a week ago we ave withness it in Jamaica yr 2023

@CaptainCajun

Жыл бұрын

@@drillatrillaofficial8069 what are you talking about lol

@drillatrillaofficial8069

Жыл бұрын

@@CaptainCajun many call only few are chosen (humans being) to see things beyond the Earth atmosphere the world is on my Right hand if you look on my birth mark it shape like Africa

@CaptainCajun

Жыл бұрын

@@drillatrillaofficial8069 bro your nutts 😂🤣 your not special, your crazy… chill

One question has always puzzled me regarding the ''moon landings'', how could we, in 1959, with less technology than that which is now contained in a modern phone and relying on Buzz's slide rule and the stars. travel 250,000 miles into space and place 12 men on the moon while today, over 50 years later and with a multitude of scientific aids we have never traveled higher than 40 miles and lost 14 astronauts? All the answers I have been given seem rather weak and lacking in substance, am I missing something?

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

The space shuttle lost 14 astronauts over 30 years in TWO accidents out of about 130 missions, 10x the number of manned missions Apollo ran. One of those was to cold weather that was completely preventable and the result of negligent mission planning, and the other because it hit something that damaged the heat shield. That's a 98% success rate, and neither of those have anything to do with the "technology in a modern phone". By the way, the major Apollo calculations were calculated on Earth using mainframe computers, the data from which was transferred up, and nobody's going to go higher than low orbit until we return to the moon because there's nothing between them but empty void.

@thomashall9182

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 130 missions to where??? The ''moon landings'' are the only major groundbreaking event in the history of the world that has never been replicated or bettered. It is equivalent to Bleriot crossing the channel in 1909 and airplanes today not getting any further than the end of the pier!! I have a friend who is an interrogator with the police, after viewing the astronauts' first press conference following the ''moon landings,'' he said that these men would definitely be remanded for further questioning as their guilt was quite apparent. I will state here and now, without fear of failure, that they will not, as promised, land on the moon in 2025. I hope I am proven wrong, but I am certain I will not be. We will wait and see...

@sauldemize9998

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 so you think the Natzi scientists did the calculations on earth to send a trash can 240,000 miles where a pod separated and landed perfectly on the Moon 1st try with out stiring up any dust so they could make a perfect foot print picture. then it took off again to reconnect with the other astronaut who was orbiting the moon at 3,157 miles an hour perfectly 1st try. All while having crystal clear communication with no delay on a walkie talkie. sorry dude! but let me know when they have high Def pictures of the items that were left on the moon. that technology exists even though the technology to get to the moon does not. their words not mine

@carolmaz8675

Жыл бұрын

Same way they could never film + 500 degrees . To minus 500 degrees with the sane Kodak camera and film .. same way astronauts could not take pictures with huge gloves on .. sane way they could not pass through the van Alan belt . Same way they could not transmit shandy gritty footage of the moon landing when it could have been clear ..same way there is no way on this planet or the next a professional organisation like nasa would lose all the original tapes of the most important filmed event in history . Same way Stanley Kubrick s wife testified he was threatened if he didn’t make the movie . Enough said

@4yoursoul

Жыл бұрын

there is an interview with one of the actual engineers that took part in the so called moon landing and believe it or not his excuse was "we lost all the equipment and documents" . so they actually treat everyone like a bunch of silly kids.

If we walked on the moon we'd have a space station with people living there by now

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Are you kidding? People today complain about the cost of the ISS, and that's a drop in the bucket compared to what a station on or in orbit around the moon would cost. With the possible exception of water, EVERYTHING required for life would have to be ferried up: food, air, fuel, etc. There is no way that the general public would have paid the long-term costs.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@HammerTruth It stopped the Apollo program.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@HammerTruth You obviously didn't live through the 60s. People were absolutely nuts about the space program. Every launch and recovery was a major media event. People saw Guss Grissom almost drown when the hatch on the Liberty Bell blew prematurely.

@gunternetzer9621

Жыл бұрын

@HammerTruth Basically once Apollo 11 had returned from the Moon and President Kennedy's goal had been achieved, cutbacks began under Nixon during a widescale retreat from technology projects due to competing demands e.g. Vietnam War, 70’s recession, public apathy and of course, Nixon never liked Kennedy and didn’t want to prolong his legacy. It was also extremely dangerous; out of 12 manned Apollo missions, including a ground test, there was one catastrophic failure (Apollo 1) and a mission failure (Apollo 13), that’s a terrible ratio and it was not economically sustainable. Each mission cost one billion dollars to put two men on the surface for a maximum of 3 days! There was/is no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time. Even Apollo astronaut Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’

@Blackpill149

Жыл бұрын

Moons gravity is very weak for humans to survive even with oxygen

“But the media said it was true, so it must be.” -Every idiot ever

@doob.

9 күн бұрын

It all started in school, especially science teachers teach theories and calculated assumptions as FACTS.

same free masons different time

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Yawn. The usual BS from an ignorant conspiracy freak. Out of the entire corps of astronauts, 10 were masons.

@rodrigozauli6573

2 ай бұрын

Jews

@alchemY.420

Ай бұрын

@@rodrigozauli6573jesuits

@doob.

9 күн бұрын

@@rodrigozauli6573Exactly

Man-bats? More like fallen angels.

@marlinwicks3500

11 ай бұрын

Man bats? More like skin flutes.

@marlinwicks3500

11 ай бұрын

Man BATS? More like BAT mans.

@donatoiacovino6968

21 күн бұрын

​@@marlinwicks3500lol

Next on BBC: THE "GREATER MOON HOAX" OF 1969

There is no telemetry hard data of the Apollo 11 mission as NASA lost it 😂

@perkins1439

8 ай бұрын

Maybe they didn't really lose it maybe there was nothing there to lose

@VivekanandaKF

6 ай бұрын

"Telemetry data is essentially the information transmitted from the spacecraft to Earth, providing details about various aspects of the mission, such as the spacecraft's status, navigation, and scientific measurements. The telemetry data from Apollo 11, along with subsequent Apollo missions, was carefully collected, analyzed, and archived by NASA. In recent years, there have been efforts to digitize and preserve the original Apollo mission data to ensure its long-term accessibility and availability for scientific research and historical purposes. The statement that NASA lost telemetry data from the Apollo 11 mission is a misconception and not supported by historical records or the wealth of information available about the Apollo program."

@justingammon1163

4 ай бұрын

Imagine Ferdinand Magellan comes back from finding the Pacific passage and circumnavigating the globe... Then he says "Trust me bro" and burns all his charts😂 If nasa really went to the moon all original prints would be sitting unmolested in a vault. They would NEVER "destroy the technology" that got them there.

@VivekanandaKF

4 ай бұрын

it's not true that NASA lost telemetry hard data from the Apollo 11 mission. The telemetry data from Apollo 11 and subsequent Apollo missions were indeed recorded and stored. However, there have been some misunderstandings and misconceptions about the telemetry tapes. One primary issue is that the original telemetry tapes were recorded in a format that became obsolete over time, and the equipment needed to read them became scarce. Additionally, there were efforts to reuse tapes due to budget constraints in the early days of space exploration, which led to some tapes being erased and reused. While there were challenges in accessing and preserving the original telemetry data, NASA and other organizations have made extensive efforts to recover, digitize, and preserve as much of the data as possible. Significant portions of the Apollo telemetry data have been recovered and are available for analysis and research.

@wombat5534

Ай бұрын

​@@VivekanandaKF Thank you for sharing this, I wish this was explained more often to the 99% of skeptical dumbasses out there.

My husband fights with me over this. He is dead set on believing the lies and can't imagine a world where everything we have been told just isn't true.

@AL-tv4ht

10 ай бұрын

HE WILL FIND OUT THE TRUTH REAL SOON

@steviewonder7495

10 ай бұрын

Your husband isn't a conspiracy theory nut like you.

@marksprague1280

10 ай бұрын

He has a paranoid idiot for a wife.

@eduardorubio3031

10 ай бұрын

Looks like he married a very dumb person.

@willywantoknow2563

10 ай бұрын

Watch 'the trueman show' with him

Media’s on media’s lies and illusions is hilarious... One group of liars investigation of another group of liars ...

The moon landing reminds me more of a Stanley Kubrick movie, several questions come to mind 1) would you feel safe traveling to the surface in a lander that looks constructed with what appears to be foil and aluminum. 2) when the lunar lander was taking off who was left behind with the camera to pan up keeping it in focus. 3) when walking around on the moon why do the shadows keep changing. 4) if the moon has this thick dust like surface when landing on the surface and taking off there should of been massive dust, now that’s a studio production. NASA= not a space agency but a financial coup for the military industrial complex, how much money have they extracted.

@kevinskinner4986

11 ай бұрын

1. The Apollo astronauts were professional test pilots they joined NASA, an extremely dangerous profession that killed many of their colleagues. Doing things that a sane person would not feel safe doing is literally their job. 2. The rover has a camera turret on it the can be controlled via remote. You can see it spinning around with nobody behind it (because they have mirrors on their faces) for much of the footage in the later missions. 3. Probably because the ground isn't flat. Shadows become longer on a downward slope and shorter on an upward one. 4. Dust clouds don't form in a vacuum. Without air to hold the particles up, it'll immediately settle at the same speed as a ton of bricks. The fact that dust clouds swirl when then the ship lands in 2001 is one of many clues that give away that it's phoney baloney. Also, if you think the moon landing reminds you of a Stanley Kubrick movie, then might I suggest you actually sit down and actually watch Kubrick's work first. I know that 2001's more boring than watching paint dry, but if you actually watched it, you'd know it doesn't resemble Apollo in the slightest.

@marksprague1280

10 ай бұрын

R.E. Mote, the cousin of Kilroy of WWII fame manned the camera that streamed the live views of the Apollo liftoff from the moon, under the able direction of Ed Fendell from Houston. Like his illustrious cousin, R.E. has been everywhere. He's been at the bottom of the ocean, into nuclear reactors, on the moon, Mars, and Venus, toured the outer planets and beyond. He turns on the light in your refrigerator, and in your car.

@marksprague1280

10 ай бұрын

This reminds of all the other vague, ignorant queries put forth by scientifically-illiterate conspiracy freaks.

@maxamahnken7325

9 ай бұрын

False

@paulag7634

9 ай бұрын

1) _"would you feel safe traveling to the surface in a lander that looks constructed with what appears to be foil and aluminium."_ You said it *" **_appears_** to be made of...."* Yes, the pressure hull was made of aluminium alloy, just like airliners are made of an aluminium alloy. The pressure difference between the inside of an airliner cabin and the outsides pressure at 40,000ft, is about 9psi; the pressure difference between the inside of the Lunar Module and a vacuum was only 5psi. No problem. The "tinfoil" was a metalized Mylar sheet to reflect solar infrared radiation, it was not structual. 2) _"when the lunar lander was taking off who was left behind with the camera to pan up keeping it in focus."_ Really? You can't even grasp the idea they had remotely operated cameras in 1970? It took a bit of practice to get the timing right because of the delay, but the technology was commonly available in the late 1960s. 3) _"when walking around on the moon why do the shadows keep changing."_ Total nonsense. The shadows do *exactly* what would be expected. A more difficult question to answer is "Why would they keep moving if it was filmed in a studio?" If there were, as many moon landing deniers claim, multiple light sources then each object *must* cast multiple shadows. They did not. What we saw was that each object cast one and only one shadow, a wide angle camera or a panning video can make this look a little strange but what we actually saw was exactly what we would have expected to see. 4) _"if the moon has this thick dust like surface when landing on the surface and taking off there should of been massive dust"_ A little more complicated to explain, but there are several reasons why there would not be a massive dust cloud. Firstly the both the descent and ascent motors were designed to work in a vacuum, therefore the exhaust jet spread out in a wide cone, and with no atmosphere to constrain the exhaust cone the pressure on the surface would have been extremely low. On landing the descent engine was throttled down before touch down. On take of the Ascent Module the Descent Stage was in-between the ascent engine and the surface, shielding the surface from the blast. Finally, with no atmosphere, what little of the lunar regolith was disturbed very quickly fell straight back down, and did not billow up to form a cloud. In 1969 Neil Armstong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon. Get over it.

Most of people don't know about fish bowl operation, that the sky cant be crushed and Penetrated even by nuclir

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

But your fake Flat Earthers claim that the sun is 3,000 miles high, but inside the dome, so they apparently bombed thousands of miles away from it????

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Most people actually graduated from high school.

@3dsmaxrocks699

Жыл бұрын

Jet fuel cannot melt the flat earth!!!!!!!

@ribosome1681

10 ай бұрын

@@marksprague1280 Utterly roasted.

@huckstaunfiltered8200

5 ай бұрын

​@@marksprague1280 That's the problem, high school brain washing, perhaps look into Operation Fish Bowl, before uttering your indoctrinated 12th grade education 🤡

So he single-handedly discovered his equivalent of the internet and the net-loons that inhabit it. I feel the pain.

Unicorn means one horned there are one horned rhinoceros in India, Nepal and other parts of Asian in Latin it was called Rhinoceros unicornis.

There is an Ambras Syndrome which causes hair on most of the body so if you see any extremely hairy people it could just be someone with this condition. It is extremely rare estimated to happen to about 1 in a billion people so there could be about 8 in the world. The story of beauty and the beast may have been inspired by Pedro Gonzalez later renamed Petrus Gonsalvus a Latin version of same name he married Catherine a daughter of a servant of member of a royal family which was arranged as a joke by the queen they had marriage of 40 years.

@SharlLegrerg

Жыл бұрын

ok

@queentrinitywombeast6472

Жыл бұрын

Being hairy is natural... we are half beast

@johnd1466

Жыл бұрын

@@queentrinitywombeast6472 when are the other apes, gorillas, Simeon's, chimps etc gonna evolve?

@queentrinitywombeast6472

Жыл бұрын

@@johnd1466 they're not! They're what they are for a reason

@Affliction99

Жыл бұрын

True

why Neil Alden Armstrong never took a lie detector test still puzzles me to this day

In the UK they were called penny dreadfuls because they printed any old bolocks

BBC is the most trusted media in the world right.🤣🤣

Sorry about the ads!

Science is a religion. People will believe whatever they're told by authority

@tompostepski5106

6 ай бұрын

Its not a religion my guy. People who know, know.

@Markus-hq1gh

Ай бұрын

That's an interesting viewpoint. Here's why science is different from religion: Evidence-Based: Science relies on evidence gathered through observation, experimentation, and data analysis. Theories are constantly tested and refined based on new evidence. Religion often relies on faith and beliefs that may not be provable through scientific methods. Open to Change: Science is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made. If evidence contradicts a theory, scientists are willing to adapt or even discard it. Religion often has established doctrines that are not easily changed. Repeatability: Scientific experiments can be replicated by others to verify the results. Religious experiences are often subjective and not easily replicated. Questioning: Scientists are encouraged to question and challenge existing ideas. Religion often discourages questioning core beliefs. Authority in Science: While scientists may be respected for their expertise, science doesn't rely on blind faith in authority figures. Evidence and logical reasoning are central to scientific progress. So, while science can seem complex and have experts, it's driven by a desire to understand the universe based on evidence and a willingness to change ideas as we learn more.

@TheSateef

4 сағат бұрын

science is reproduceable by anyone on this planet or any other and the results area measurable and verifiable. religion is what ever some group of people say it is

We sent a man to the moon over 250,000 miles but did not send a rover to check it out first yes ok NASA.

@michaelfuchs

10 ай бұрын

Nasa landed 5 spacecraft on the moon before the Apollo landings. They were called Surveyor. Please learn a little bit about the history of spaceflight before making a comment about the history of spaceflight.

@yoskarokuto3553

10 ай бұрын

@@michaelfuchs never go back to look the greastest legendary mission of mankind at " apollo landing site " ???

@marksprague1280

9 ай бұрын

​@@yoskarokuto3553Why bother? You mindless fools would simply label it fake, just like you have the the photos taken by the LRO AND those taken by probes from China and India.

@carcinogen60yearsago

5 ай бұрын

It's embarrassing a simple Google search that will prove you wrong, but you just refuse to do any research. Ironic, because you people always love to say do your own research.

@user-fl4jv3gc7w

Ай бұрын

​@@michaelfuchs😂😂😂😂😂😂

NY Sun is still around today and I could see them running something like this story again

@mslondoner185

Жыл бұрын

They're doing crazy stories now, and people are still believing them.

@ashtonbradshaw5276

Жыл бұрын

i can see it to😁

@sigmasix3719

Жыл бұрын

Ukraine is winning 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Lmfao

@scottabc72

Жыл бұрын

@@sigmasix3719 Dear bot, why did you decide to make a comment about Ukraine when the video and the comments you responded to said nothing about Ukraine? Please explain.

Nice Edit... Kristy & Joe

Software on my android smartphone has better technology than that of 60's & 70's computers NASA had. How did that ancient camera survive the radiation of the van allen belt?

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

IIRC, NASA had one of the first Cray supercomputers. How did the camera survive? Quite easily.

@gunternetzer9621

Жыл бұрын

The Van Allen belts are very narrow, occupying a fraction of the path between the Earth and the Moon. The Saturn V trajectory took the rocket through the thinnest part of the outer belts in about 90 minutes, so the dose of radiation was within safety limits. Each mission flew a slightly different course in order to access its landing site, but the orbital inclination of the translunar coast trajectory was inclined to the Earth’s equator by about 30°. A spacecraft following that trajectory would bypass all but the edges of the Van Allen belts. Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation.

@gunternetzer9621

Жыл бұрын

@HammerTruth The Orion Mission involves taking a much longer time to travel through the Van Allen belts and modern spacecraft are controlled by very high-density computers, that are far more vunerable to particle radiation than the Apollo computers, which used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard. So a new solution needs to found to two different problems than in 1969-72.

@hybriddunce

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 sick

@mrsbradyoldlady2523

6 ай бұрын

Even if you believe all that, and the camera survived, no one will convince me that the film would have survived, even negligible radiation would have rendered the film unprintable

I was ten years old when we watched the landing on live TV. And I remember looking at my parents and thinking, " we're doing THIS now?" This was after finding out the b.s. about Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the tooth fairy!

@TimeMasterOG

Ай бұрын

Yeah except those 3 things are actually fake and the moon landings aren't...

@aok4418

Ай бұрын

@@TimeMasterOG The Moon landings are fake. Unless you believe the footage and still photos could survive the radiation and extreme temperatures. Did the plastic cameras convince you? 🤔

@josephmorin8941

Ай бұрын

Tamara, what are you saying?!😳

@tamaralombard2916

29 күн бұрын

@@josephmorin8941 even a child can see through the lies. That's what.

@josephmorin8941

28 күн бұрын

I love you Tamara! We are on the same team! You do know I was just trying to be funny in that last reply.....don't you? If not, well, you know it now.

Elon Musk will never land on the moon. The best he can do is put a car in orbit. Jeff Bezos could afford to go to the moon, but he can't so he didn't.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Whether or not Musk ever makes it to the moon, he has already accomplished a major feat by successfully injecting private enterprise into spaceflight. This will have a more lasting effect on history than another landing on the moon.

@mike.j3913

Жыл бұрын

But Elon Musk has more money than Bezos and Elon is much more smarter in space exploration than Bezos

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@mike.j3913 Neither has a rocket with the capability of lifting a manned craft into lunar orbit -- yet.

@gunternetzer9621

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 Saturn V, 1969-72.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@gunternetzer9621 RIP Saturn V. You served honorably.

The only way NASA can go to the moon for real is asking China for a ride when China go to the moon.

@white_heat.truth76

11 ай бұрын

Have you seen their footage? Confucius Say you're off your rocker!

@Par590ty42

3 ай бұрын

Let me get it straight: you will never believe in the Apollo missions, no matter how many proofs of their veracity exist, just because they were made by the USA. But if China ever does a manned moon landing in the future, you will believe it blindly just because it was made by China? This is the most moronic and hypocritical thing I've ever read.

“… later admits it was a piece of chorizo”. Enlightening indeed.

BBC trying hard

Poor Locke

@WesleyAtkinson

Жыл бұрын

IT'S OUR DESTINY JACK

Maybe in another 55 years someone might actually get there .

@neilpike6758

Жыл бұрын

if the properties of a vacuum change and the sun stops heating the moon up then men could go outside of our protective cover and stand on the hot moon.

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

@@neilpike6758 .... but the temperatures on the moon are only about 250F radiant. Suits for working in industrial kilns are resistant to radiant temperatures of over 2,000.

@neilpike6758

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 thanks for the information. At 110c how many minutes do you think a human could survive?

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

@neilpike6758 Depends on the suit? You can have suits that reflect 90% of the incoming energy (that's why heat hazard suits are either white or silver) and they have a cooling system in the backpack. Probably quite a while since radiant resistance is the easiest form of heat to mitigate and there's no convection in a vacuum.

@neilpike6758

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 yes I agree that there is no convection or conduction of heat in a vacuum. In his sealed suit his cooling system in the backpack would throw out heat, and as there is no convection or conduction in a vacuum, he would be boiled in his sealed suit...never mind the constant body heat trapped inside his sealed suit. Considering this science, do you still think there was a man on the moon?

Why haven't we ever gone back? That seems strange.

@laurivaltter

Күн бұрын

its kinda obvious why. but we honeslty have more important problems right now

The second lie: no man ever set foot on the Moon.

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

9 ай бұрын

You have neglected to provide any evidence to back up your claim. Is this because you do not have any? Take care.

@manueldeabreu1980

Ай бұрын

There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972. 6 missions landed on the moon. 2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander. So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions. Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon. 1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before. 2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design. 3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon. 4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.

@user-ky5dy5hl4d

29 күн бұрын

@@manueldeabreu1980 NASA lost 300 thousand telemetric recording reels of Apollo 11 down to the last one. They don't even have one reel left of that momentous deed. Can you believe that? I can. Because there was no landing of man on the Moon.

Watch the Documentary “a funny thing happened on the way to the Moon”.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

I guess that you could consider that a documentary, if you ignore all the lies that taxi-driving con man told.

@johnd1466

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 Anything said by anyone is dubious A certain mr neil A Said @ the Whitehouse of all places Wilbur Wright note "the only bird that can talk was a parrot, and he didn't fly very well" So I'll be breifer than both Blah blah blah "Removing one of truths protective layers" What could Neil himself meant?

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@johnd1466 I'd take Armstrong's word over that of a convicted criminal and proven liar any time.

@gunternetzer9621

Жыл бұрын

@@johnd1466 I think he was being poetic.

It’s only us…

Chorizo lmaooo

There's no way in 60s man step foot on the moon AND made it back in one piece. No way. Imagine how many little things needed to work perfectly, especially back then. No way. I could perhaps believe somehow made it to the moon, but... That would be it.

@TheFracturedfuture

Жыл бұрын

@@user-rm3cn7vr1n It's way easier and cheaper to make a film than it is to actually go to the moon. How the f*** is actually going to the moon going to be cheaper than faking it?

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@TheFracturedfuture Because you would have to find a way to fool not only the 400,000 or so who worked on the project, but the million or more third party people who observed, tracked and eavsedropped on each flight, plus the thousands of scientists, engineers, and other professionals who analyzed the returned results.

@TheFracturedfuture

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 400,000 who worked on the project lol. You mean the 40 people who worked on the movie.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@TheFracturedfuture Why do you clowns have to continually lie? Are your lives truly that payhetic?

@TheFracturedfuture

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 Clown + pathetic = You

Keine Lüge kann groß und schlecht genug sein, dass sich nicht Menschen finden, die sie glauben wollen.

Wonderful and terrifying. Nice job as usual, BBC.

I'm now in 2023 if I go to my bedroom I completely lose mobile and Internet Signal. Can someone explain TO ME how did nasa 50 years ago when there was barely mobile phones travel to a distance 30 times larger than the distance of earth yet still managed to make calls to the earth

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Easy. Do you have a 200 foot diameter parabolic dish as your antenna? NASA did, along with an absolutely clear line of sight to the transmitter.

@000aysh

Жыл бұрын

Exactly @Nature Breeze. Particularly using an old wired dial telephone

@9Dan22

Жыл бұрын

@@000aysh but I didn't say they kept in touch with earth phone. I meant some sort of a signal machine. There is no evidence they went apart from an edited clip been circulated. Oh, they lost the evidence. That's correct

@9Dan22

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 so they claimed they had no proper camera to take photo of the full earth back then. But they had all the signalling tools that and technology to the moon that aparantly you can't get now anymore 70 years later

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@9Dan22 Idiot. Ham radio operators have been bouncing messages off the moon for decades, using home grown equipment. Just how hard do you think that straight single leg communication is, given NASA's budget and world wide facilities access?

I live on the moon 🌙 My name is Mr Bigfoot!

I Just saw space x blow up I’m not so sure

no one has been on the moon , so yes it was fake news in 1969, but we already no this

@maxamahnken7325

9 ай бұрын

Men ----- went to the Moon.

Hear me out. They saw him see them and moved to the far side of the moon.

ON THE MOON !! why always the same background??? are there camaras on the other side ????????????

@vcare4893

4 күн бұрын

Sudio door.

If u believe we landed on the moon ure living in a dream world

@ribosome1681

10 ай бұрын

If u had good grammar u might seem like ure slightly less of an idiot.

@maxamahnken7325

9 ай бұрын

Humans went to the Moon

@ohwhatfunitistowalk

Ай бұрын

@@maxamahnken7325 No proof whatsoever. And why didn't/don't we build a base there?

@maxamahnken7325

Ай бұрын

@@ohwhatfunitistowalk Humans went to the Moon circa 1968-1972. I don't give any Moon Landing Deniers any credibility nor ------- would I waste my time with them. To some of them may even think that the Earth is flat.

@ohwhatfunitistowalk

Ай бұрын

@@maxamahnken7325 Keep dreaming, troll. Some day you may wake up.

Not only did we not go to the moon that day. We never EVER went to the moon.

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

9 ай бұрын

You have neglected to provide any evidence to back up your claim. Is this because you do not have any? Take care

@Ilikeformulaone

8 ай бұрын

Did we set foot on the moon maybe. But you have to be an absolute idiot to think that we have never landed something on the moon.

@maxamahnken7325

7 ай бұрын

Man travelling to the Moon from 1969 to 1972.

@badtuber1654

2 ай бұрын

@@maxamahnken7325 tesla blew up third rocket this year trying to do the same, with 500,000 times more advanced tech.

@maxamahnken7325

2 ай бұрын

Man went to the Moon ------ circa 1969-1972.

Two shuttle disasters in low earth orbit and all those trips to the moon with old technology and nobody died???

@SharlLegrerg

Жыл бұрын

and also there have been countless other times shuttles and other devices worked. Also have you ever heard of the Apollo 1 disaster? Or the Apollo 13 disaster?

@Blue-jn1ph

Жыл бұрын

Yes, people have actually died trying to explore space. Are you dense? We were just fortunate enough that many things went right with the Apollo 11 mission.

@SharlLegrerg

Жыл бұрын

@@Blue-jn1ph yeah he so dense he's about to become a black hole 💀

@Pang_Yau

Жыл бұрын

​@@SharlLegrerg he didn't say disasters he said nobody died which is true ?

@SharlLegrerg

Жыл бұрын

@@Pang_Yau people died in the apollo 1 disaster 💀💀💀 go back to school. Also 3 people almost died in the apollo 13 disaster. Many Soviet cosmonauts perished during the space race too

Man-bats? Sounds like demons

Thousand involved when 3 astronouts went to the moon and you saw the photo of the rocket. But how come they went back to the earth with only 3? No one help. No photo of the rocket when they was about to go back to earth. Like on the earth. Because if they fake it again on 'moon' , people will question them..

I CAN'T BELIEVE THE WEEKLY WORLD NEWS WAS RIGHT :y

@shevettejackson.

Жыл бұрын

Lol

The moon is made of plasma. Pure electrons. It's a luminary remember. And luminaries make their own light.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Yawn. Another flat earther. Another indictment of modern "education".

@garethaustin3137

Жыл бұрын

Well, if you call it a luminary, then, yeah, it must be.

@hannacarter1352

Жыл бұрын

@@garethaustin3137 God did, not me.

@hannacarter1352

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280Ah it looks like someone learned a new word and couldn't wait to use it. Prescious. Another ignorant, not a child of God here. Jesus Christ is the Savior and the bible is the Word of God. Just saying

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@hannacarter1352 Sorry, freak. I limit my conversations to sentient beings. Bible thumpers don't qualify.

NEVERTHELESS Watching the video of astronauts driving a vehicle on the moon surface ... Raises questions.

@KPL400

5 ай бұрын

what questions have been lowered ?

Yes, Neil Armstrong sat foot on moon

@user-fl4jv3gc7w

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂

If I had been to the moon and back several times, I would just speak about that, develop programs, publish articles, videos,.... Do you deeply understand what that means? Humanity went to the moon! I mean, it was in 1969 for the first time. WOW... I am so excited as I was born in 1972 and missed the first landings on the moon; My parents told me about this and all my childhood was filled with science and books on blackholes and space and I even won a prize for a speech I made about the discoveries of universe; Now I am in my 50's and I cannot wait to see it with my eyes. BUT I am sorry but... I feel soooo puzzled by the situation as years go by; When I took my son to the space museum in Washington, he told me: "Mom, it is a joke, this looks like a school project in middle school" speaking about the capsule. And then I started to question myself a lot. So now I cannot wait to prove to him that yes, men walked on the moon in 1969... But I do not know anymore. Even when I read the articles and all the scientists speaking about temperature, dust, making special equipments, testing this and that... It ois the first time in history of science that an achievement did not turn into progress. I mean... Why not just go back there like in 1969... we know how to do it, right? So let's go and then let's make improvements... but no... every 3 or 5 years... there is something that delays the process...And you know what? I think we are 30 pc to believe it did not happen and another 30 pc who do not dare to say they feel it never happened. And the other 30 pc are like me and wait for it to happen again...before they die...

@kristianlavigne8270

Жыл бұрын

NASA have said they lost all the telemetry data and all the technology. Unfortunately. Who would have thought 😂

@steviewonder7495

Жыл бұрын

Did you know that the Apollo 11 rocket was 363 feet tall. A shuttle is 184 feet tall. The rocket was a one way ticket with a boost and gravity return and two space shuttles one on top of the other in height just to get there and fall back down. The statue of liberty is 151feet tall from ground to torch.

@dboydboy1000

11 ай бұрын

Your son hasn’t been mind-f#%ked with 5 decades of NASA BS, Government miseducation, Disney/Hollywood propaganda, so he can see the obvious a lot faster than you can. I took my 9 nephew to Griffith Observatory and he called out multiple lies. The more you look into NASAs programs, the more they just don’t add up. Your mind has to be open, for the majority, this is near impossible.

@steviewonder7495

11 ай бұрын

Why go back to a nothingness? People don't go back up mount Everest even though the scenery is the best in the world. Why would you go back it would cost a billion in today's money just to scratch around like they are doing on Mars using machines to test everything. So why go to Mars?

@maskonfilteroff3145

11 ай бұрын

@@kristianlavigne8270 Stop lying.

Think what they can convince you of now.

Did we really go to the moon....mmmm

Nice!! Moon enlighten our night. And we return shame for it’s favour.

I got a good video on the moon hoax

The air conditioning in the suit is IMPOSSIBLE imagine the battery power?? imagine been in a oven ? How long would you last ? I don’t care how heat resistant your suit is,why more people don’t talk about this is beyond me ?

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

What do you think that the surface temperature on the lunar surface were while the astronauts were there? Have you ever bothered to look for an answer?

@jamiekeeper6204

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 whatever temp ? Have you looked at the capacity

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@jamiekeeper6204 Translation: The conspiracy nut didn't bother to check and is speaking from an abyss of ignorance. Sonny, relative to the sun the moon completes one revolution per month, so every 26 hours on the moon is the equivalent of one hour on the earth. It is very easy to select a landing place and time that is the equivalent of early morning on earth, and that is exactly what NASA did. When they landed, the surface temperatures were at about the freezing point of water, and they left 75 hours or less later, long before temperatures became uncomfortable, much less dangerous.

@yoskarokuto3553

Жыл бұрын

130 c at light side and they have only water cooling system ( water only ) 😂

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@yoskarokuto3553 Yes, lunar surface temperatures do get that high IN THE EARLY LUNAR AFTERNOON, over 100 hours after the astronauts left the surface. Remember that the surface temperatures during the lunar night drop to over -100c. It takes time to heat the surface.

Nobody can touch the moon

I'd be happy just to see a beaver on the moon. So sorry. Couldn't resist🤣

I always believed it's a hoax. Flying to the moon and back do you know how much fuel would be needed for a trip like this?! 😂😂

@redjack7296

10 ай бұрын

Well they did weird how even Russia confirmed they picked up the signal from the moon

@ribosome1681

10 ай бұрын

Ever heard of inertia bucko? Oh and yeah it did take allot of fuel.

@Roxasamico

7 ай бұрын

​@@redjack7296 we can definitely trust Russia

@redjack7296

7 ай бұрын

@Roxasamico ok Spain, Australia, and Britain confirmed it too. What's the excuses for this one?

@Roxasamico

7 ай бұрын

@@redjack7296 lol so will you finally stop saying this "Russia would have blabbed" nonsense? You don't give a second thought to the drivel you're spouting, you just jump from one idiotic justification to the next without a second thought. If you think the governments of the world are interested in keeping you accurately informed about anything, you live in a childish fantasy world. Russia's space programme was as phoney as NASA's was. Britain and Australia's space programmes partner with NASA too. You could follow the money and find all sorts of connections between the individuals that founded these agencies, where the funding came from etc. You aren't interested in understanding anything you just want to mindlessly defend what you were taught as a child. You're an embarrassment

Ok, there’s no unicorns or fornicating lunar man bats on the moon. But there’s definitely aliens! Yes, aliens are real and are behind flying saucers. How could we be duped again? It just makes sense, right? 😂

Not A Space Agency!!!

So few of these comments are about the topic of the video.

"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is, we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it is a painful process to build it back again." Don "Full of 💩 " Pettit

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

I see that you are still shoveling the same tired old bullshit. It appears that you lack the wit to dream up any new lies.

@carcinogen60yearsago

5 ай бұрын

What do you think that quote means, you use it so much?

@BadAtTeaDude

5 ай бұрын

@@carcinogen60yearsago 💤 😴

@carcinogen60yearsago

5 ай бұрын

@@BadAtTeaDude You can't answer the question?

@BadAtTeaDude

5 ай бұрын

@@carcinogen60yearsago I did stupid

This should be called “the first great moon hoax”

Russia has an orbiter orbiting the moon with HD cameras aboard. We'll see what's what pretty soon.

We all know that the ones who really did moon landing were: Virgil Grissom, Ed White and Roger

@KPL400

3 ай бұрын

Daltrey...??

@rabbit3212010

2 ай бұрын

​@@KPL400 nice!!

As if a human has ever been on the lunar surface. Laughable.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Proof? Otherwise, you're just another ignorant loudmouth.

@daryllect6659

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 🤭No, YOU are making the claim, therefor, the onus is on YOU to provide the proof.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@daryllect6659 So typical of you lying freaks. You made the original post, intimating that the landings were fake, and now you are trying to dodge the fact that you have no proof.

@daryllect6659

Жыл бұрын

@@marksprague1280 Hey! Sparky! A negative cannot be proven.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

@@daryllect6659 Translation: You are just another pathetic liar.

Even unmanned missions to moon and mars had many failures with todays technology and here comes human missions to moon using 50 year old technology with 100% success rate for 6 times straight 😂🤣

@therealzilch

9 ай бұрын

You might want to look up Apollo 13. And NASA's budget during and after the Apollo years.

@shortscut7614

9 ай бұрын

You are forgetting about trial prior to mission and the death of two men

Love how everyone who doesn't do anything but KZread all day have an argument here 😂

@pups.shadilay.6624

6 ай бұрын

Its just different sets of dolts parroting their preferred programming. On a side note, what do you beLIEve? What do you think you think about something you have been given to think about to control what you will speak about? 🐸

this is why I doubt the American constitution.

Yeah Sure! They can not Travel to the Deepest Point on Earth the Mariana Trench, which is just around 11km in depth! but can Travel so Freakin Far Away in Space! doesnt the People use their Brains ??? wtf hilarious stpd funny stuff going on, no words!

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

.... they went to the Marianas Trench in 1960, 9 years before the moon landings. James Cameron filmed an IMAX down there about ten years ago.

@alltimeklazzikz

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 🥱but not with their own Physical Body!!!

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

​@@alltimeklazzikz .... um, yes? They took a submersible. Unless you mean... like... swimming.

@alltimeklazzikz

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 of course swimming!!! Your Body gets Squeezed & youll Die. Imagine what happens in Space?? Radiaton?? Enormous Minus & Plus (degrees) Temperatures!? Micro Meteorites which instantly kill a living being ?? I mean if its a Spacesuite or Swimmsuite doesnt matter our Physical Bodys arent evolved enough to conquer these steps yet!!! I used to believe the Media & so on....right now i trust no one anymore.

@alltimeklazzikz

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinskinner4986 you can do a self experiment put just one of your fingers in a legit Vaacume Chamber, you can cover your finger with the same material which the Spacesuits are made of, guess what happens ??? I leave you to the conclusion pal... do a little Research... possible effects of Vaacume Compression on a Living being (depending on amout of time & materials used for covering!) Are these: Bone deformation, Blood is boiling lol, Cells are dying, the nerves gets stretch'd, immune system gets weaken, etc...

The Earth needs to look 10 times bigger as it should be from the moon.... But NASA forgot this and in the pic taken from Moon Surface it looks the same size as the moon as we see from earth.... 😂😂😂

@kevinskinner4986

Жыл бұрын

Conspiracy theorists "forgot" to tell you that wide angle lenses cause objects in photographs to shrink.

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

You really need to take a course in basic photography.

@Paul-nj5cr

6 ай бұрын

flat earthers havent yet discovered how cameras work

I saw a manbat fly past last night.

There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972. 6 missions landed on the moon. 2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander. So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions. Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon. 1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before. 2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design. 3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon. 4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.

@JohneeTruther

14 күн бұрын

The lunar meteorites were gathered by Von Braun who went to Antartica 2 years before A11. The North Pole doesn't have the VA Belt protection as the rest of the earth and tons of lunar meteors reach Antarctica every year. They scrubbed the reentry heat off the meteors and lasered them which all show the same diameter man-made size which is impossible to occur naturally. Nobody can test any of the rocks and we are just supposed to believe NASA that somebody not associated with them tested them.

hoax forever

We’re all on a prison planet folks! No one can leave, plain and simple. We keep coming back living life after life after life.. Btw the moon is satellite. There was a time when it wasn’t there. It was put there.. Chew on that.

@queentrinitywombeast6472

Жыл бұрын

It's a hologram lol

@pete401

Жыл бұрын

@@queentrinitywombeast6472 holograms don’t cause tides my dear. It’s very real. It just isn’t what people think it is.

@queentrinitywombeast6472

Жыл бұрын

@@pete401 the moon never caused tides honey lol that's just what they told you!!!

@GodOfPlonkers

Жыл бұрын

@@queentrinitywombeast6472 then what does 😭 you’re both wrong but at least peter acknowledged that the moon affects our tides

@queentrinitywombeast6472

Жыл бұрын

@@GodOfPlonkers lmao it does not and what you believe will never change my beliefs. That thing is a hologram like everything else in the sky. In the beginning the only light source we had was our sun. But I bet y'all believe we live on a globe and there's a curvature or that gravity has us spinning through out the galaxy lmao I don't argue with your kind because it's like arguing with Kindergartens. Lmao good day!!!

India has landed on the moon wearing a lungi apparently 🤣🤣🤣

@sri-6374

7 ай бұрын

😂

@madhuri4355

6 ай бұрын

so is lungi supposed to be bad ? although one needs proper spacesuit for human to survive in space... idiot muslim bin laden 😂

We never had the technology to land on the moon 😅

There is life on the moon. Just not beavers walking upright, they are 'water bears' Tardigrades - often called water bears - are creatures under a millimetre long that can survive being heated to 150C and frozen to almost absolute zero. They were travelling on an Israeli spacecraft that crash-landed on the moon in April. And the co-founder of the organisation that put them there thinks they're almost definitely still alive.

@daryllect6659

Жыл бұрын

"...almost definitely ..." absolutely might ? positively maybe?

@bexleydragon5294

Жыл бұрын

It's those bear necessities 😀

@thechroniclegamer4285

Жыл бұрын

Tardigrades dont live on the moon, they just hibernate in space for a while but then will die shortly after

@steviewonder7495

Жыл бұрын

All Americans are off their nuts.

@marlinwicks3500

11 ай бұрын

Israeli tardigrades crash landed on the moon?!?!? So these Israelis were cruising around in space in their rocket ship, just looking for a place to release their adorable cargo when they experienced trouble and happened to be close enough to the moon for a crash landing. That's breathtakingly hilarious hahaha!!!

your talking about NASA as good at soace travels? and during 1960s ? and they got whooped by SpaceX? 😅

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

Thus far SpaceX's expertise is limited to launching satellites, something that NASA has been doing for 60 years.

Wait a minute. The commentator is suggesting the issue was people believing "religious astronomers." Hmmm . . . wasn't the problem that the people believed what they read in the newspapers???

In the moon, there are alot of craters, was there any view that the landed moon austronaut walked around one of the crater?! What! Thomas D**k?!!!

If we did not go, Russia would have called us out, they were watching closely, and they have not been the friendliest of friends.

@masterchief8085

Жыл бұрын

Yeah and somehow they did once but decided never to do it again 😵😵

@marksprague1280

Жыл бұрын

​@@masterchief8085 Actually, they did it 6 times and had several more planned when Congress pulled the plug.

@FriendlySlots

Жыл бұрын

The reason it is taking so long to go back to the moon is because of money and no way to take the resources back and forth from earth and moon and vice-versa without a large amount of amount of money that would offset any profits that may incur.

@thisisausername.595

Жыл бұрын

@@FriendlySlots that is bullcrap. Take all of oprah winfreys money and you have the money, guaranteed. This is one of the reasons why people are choosing communism, communism might just take us outside our planet after all.

@Dvenchy

8 ай бұрын

No. They have their own space hoaxes to worry about.

lol new star was a slice of sausage. People will fall for anything today

I guess DC Comics Batman comes from Man Bat

The moon is an old Andromedan biosphere ship named Creiddylad that was severely damaged in the Battle of Tiamat (where the asteroid belt is now). So it was placed in earths orbit as a means to control the planetary wobbling caused by the destruction of Tiamat. This information comes from the Taygetans currently in earths orbit.

@gives_bad_advice

Ай бұрын

Cool. That makes sense.

@josephmorin8941

Ай бұрын

@@gives_bad_advice thanx. Something I didn't bother saying about that situation is this: when Tiamat was destroyed, the oceans waters and indescribably large chunks of soil/rock all began to drift through space until a portion of it reached Earth's atmosphere. It rained water and soil for 40 days and nights (Noah's flood) and caused mudslides (the mud floods). Also, the wobbling is what caused the Younger-Dryas. This information as well comes directly from the Taygetans and Swaruus currently in Earth's orbit.

@laurivaltter

23 сағат бұрын

​@@josephmorin8941what? this is mythology not bible

Then, with great Irony, the religious people we're probably closer to accurate in reality, thinking there's Batman on the Moon.

If it were doable in 1969, 55 years ago ... how come many projects have been struggling today with far advanced technology like China, Japan Russia Japan, including the Artemis and Elon Musk projects?

@gives_bad_advice

2 ай бұрын

Because, believe it or not, flying to the moon is expensive and dangerous and is an enormous undertaking.

@Markus-hq1gh

Ай бұрын

You're right, there seems like a contradiction. We did land on the moon in 1969, and it can be surprising that returning seems so difficult today. Here's a breakdown of some key factors: Shifting Priorities: In the 1960s, the moon landing was a national priority for the US due to the Space Race with the Soviet Union. Funding was much higher as a result. Today, space exploration faces competition from other national priorities, leading to a more spread-out budget. Focus Changed: The Apollo missions were a one-shot push to get to the moon first. The focus was on a single, ambitious goal. Today's programs like Artemis aim for a sustainable lunar presence, requiring different infrastructure and technology. Technological Advancements are a Double-Edged Sword: We have more advanced materials and computer systems, but some aspects are still under development. Reusable rockets are a great example. While promising, they're still being perfected, adding complexity. International Collaboration: The Apollo missions were a purely American effort. Today, programs like Artemis involve international collaboration, which can add logistical challenges. It's Still Incredibly Difficult: Even with advancements, space travel remains inherently dangerous and complex. The moon is a harsh environment with radiation and extreme temperatures.

What, no comments???

Manbats fornicating with no womenbats?