I was undecided but I think I will buy one now!

@KlignEngineering

3 ай бұрын

Hopefully I'll get a referral bonus!

@wadehiggins1114

3 ай бұрын

See the A350-1000 before you make the purchase.

@scootertrash911

3 ай бұрын

Can we get 72 month financing?

@wadehiggins1114

3 ай бұрын

@@scootertrash911 do you mean 72 years?

Great job on the video - from a pilot ..and pre-pilot days, one who was lucky enough to get a 777 tour at Boeing decades ago, when a United Airlines sales manager.

Something no one seems to talk about are the cabin noise levels. The 777 is already very loud compared to the Dreamliner or any Airbus product. Now they made the cabin walls thinner by probably reducing the amount of insulating material…I wonder how that is gonna fair. Noise is incredibly fatiguing on long flights if you are exposed to it all the time.

@MarcPagan

3 ай бұрын

Roger that on the noise, from a pilot. That said, noise cancelling earbuds and headsets are super cheap, and work well.

@trevorhart545

3 ай бұрын

@@MarcPaganWhy have the problem in the first place?

@dss3113

3 ай бұрын

@@MarcPagan True, but its a problem thats unnecessary in the first place. Also, as you know, for the crew it’s not that easy. Yes, you can wear hearing protection, but it only dampens so much of the noise. I’m definitely a fan of the A350/380/787 in that regard. I find it kind of hypocritical to praise the comfort of the cabin with fancy LED lighting while neglecting one of the most basic aspects of comfort.

@MarcPagan

3 ай бұрын

good point, but bottom line...more sound proofing means more weight, which means more fuel burn, which means more money needed to buy a ticket/make a profit. @@trevorhart545

@certifiedmanul

Ай бұрын

@@trevorhart545Because, believe it or not, launching a giant alloy tube with 400 passengers and their luggage and the fuel across the world in 15 hours requires nearly 300,000lbs of thrust. and you make that quiet, I’ll give you $20

1:39 “The most fuel efficient engine in its class” Well what else besides the GE90, it’s direct predecessor, is there in its class? 😂

@Bangabalunga

3 ай бұрын

I know right! lol

@trevorhart545

3 ай бұрын

When you have to come out with this BS you know they are clutching at straws. I was waiting for the best colour scheme or the best tyres in its class?

@John-nc4bl

3 ай бұрын

GE build the best engines. Best reliability and most sold.@@trevorhart545

@John-nc4bl

3 ай бұрын

GE make great engines.@@trevorhart545

@cxaviation3313

11 күн бұрын

Trent XWB-97K

Beautiful aircraft! The 777 is my favorite plane. Followed by the A330

I'm lucky to see this plane in person every single day and it's looks nothing less than magical how it glides thru the air...

A door blew out in a pressurization test. The order book is Emirates dominated. Looking at the order book, I am reminded of the A380 order book. I fear Boeing has produced a flying Edsel. IMHO.

This was a great advertisement. You called 777x revolutionary when it is evolutionary. You called the GE engine best in class when it is actually a class of one. No other engine is as close as 20,000 pounds of thrust to this. 18 inch wide seats would be the narrowest of any widebody currently produced on Earth. Even the Russian Ilyushin 96-400 has 18.5" seat width. Lots more you mentioned that are a bit of a stretch...... I love the triple 7, I do, but please don't stretch facts.

@KlignEngineering

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment. And you're correct about the engine, misleading on my part... However, you're incorrect about the 18" seats. There are several wide body jets currently and previously produced that are smaller than 18". A380: 16.5-18" A330: 16.5-18" A350: 16.5-18" along with many of Boeing's previous models being under 18"! Not to mention that the Ilyshun has a seat width of 18", not 18.5" Source: www.alternativeairlines.com/wide-body-aircraft

@Bangabalunga

3 ай бұрын

@KlignEngineering hi there. I said planes in production, a380 and a330 are not in production. A330 neo is in production bit designed as a 2 4 2 configuration and airlines make it 3 3 3. However on the second generation 777, boeing is marketing it as a 3 4 3 configuration. Which makes it the narrowest wide body. A350 is 18.5 inches. A380 never had 16.5 inch 11abreast seating

@rajsub7804

3 ай бұрын

@@Bangabalungabuddy, if airlines are ordering the 330neo in a 3-3-3, then it’s something the manufacturer intended for. Think once in awhile

@antiksur8883

3 ай бұрын

​​@@rajsub7804Most a330neos are in 2 4 2 configuration. And there is no indication that that is about to change. Do you think the default configuration that most airlines will opt for is something other than the 3 4 3 config?

@desertmodern7638

3 ай бұрын

There are multiple widebody seat configurations of less than 18" from Airbus and Boeing.

I'm no longer much of a Boeing fan, but I've always loved the 777 and hope the X is successful. Excellent video. I appreciated the disclaimer when showing a non-777X aircraft. So many videographers mix shots of many non-subject aircraft without providing clarification.

Just taxied by several parked 777X at PAE. Man, they are Monsters! This coming from a former 747 driver.

Nice vid, I subscribed.

Interesting, great vid!

Boeing just needs to get their act together. I wish they stop showing it off and do what they need to get it FAA-approved and certified. They need to get them to airlines who really want the plane and made massive orders, but have been waiting for years after covid and with this plane faceing more delays year after year.

The 777X truly is a golden opportunity for Boeing. Despite their recent troubles, the 777 has an incredible legacy (imagine a fly-by-wire twinjet with the second highest passenger capacity at the time of its launch that is designed entirely by computer at a time where A300s and DC-10s/MD-11s were still in passenger service) and this is an opportunity to carry the torch of the fantastic 777-300ER decades into the future.

Just don’t crash, explode, or depressurise…… 149% maximum stress test is suggesting they are cutting corners. Cathay bought it so it matters to my safety

Think 767 and 757 as applied to the 787 and 757X. Synergy, similar type rating, extensive shared component use. It is a no brainer.

The world needs another Joe Sutter! Mr Sutter developed the 747 in 4 years and was also a revolutionary aircraft!

Cabin pressure 6000’ or 7000’ altitude?

Great video, usage of footage and edits! Subscribed.

@KlignEngineering

3 ай бұрын

Thank you!

Great job putting this together

@KlignEngineering

3 ай бұрын

Thanks!

Great job!

@KlignEngineering

3 ай бұрын

Thank you!

Love the video!

@KlignEngineering

3 ай бұрын

Thank you!!

lets hope this doesn't end up like 737 MAX

What revolutionary design, it's a facelift, nothing more

@Bangabalunga

3 ай бұрын

Exactly. Boeing just keeps doing facelifts and wondering why they are falling behind in sales...

@divemaster2452

2 ай бұрын

A320? A330?

@NurislamPopov

2 ай бұрын

@@divemaster2452 I beg your pardon?

There is absolute zero indication so far that Boeing is getting their stuff together. Golden-tongue Calhoun saying stuff has zero weight for me, he’s been CEO long enough for things to get better. Yet, the board still has ZERO engineers in it. How are lawyers, MBAs and fund managers supposed to know how to fix production if they can’t even be bothered to invite one engineer in their midst?

You can actually fly on an A350. 777X is still years from flying paying passengers. Not much competition.

Just to make sure it’s safe. Without safety everything else is nothing. The body looks so long.

Airbus is number 1!

@richardmorris7063

3 ай бұрын

Grow up!

Jam tomorrow?

Any wiggle room on that price?

And why exactly do you think that rehashing another 20 year old design will in some way “save” Boeing? As others have said this is a great advert but fact it ain’t.

glad i have ad blocker

You mention slot restricted airports a couple of times. Airbus thought the same thing with the A380. Has the high alpha problem been fixed yet? Shop talk was that they were going to do it with software. 2013-2026 with a $6.5 billion write off. From the Boeing financials: 'In April 2022, we decided to pause production of the 777-9 during 2022 and 2023, which resulted in cumulative abnormal production costs of $0.8 billion. In the fourth quarter of 2023, the 777X program resumed production.' That's on top of the $6.5 billion write off.

I would like to see the 777-9 become such a success, that Airbus will decide to develop an A350-2000. Because even with the extra 4 inches, the 3-4-3 config in economy is dreadful.

Made in America! USA! USA! USA!

@wadehiggins1114

3 ай бұрын

That's why it's no good! Just like tesla and apple.

@AvStuff1

3 ай бұрын

Bro, Boeing makes airplanes that are just as good as Airbus.

@wadehiggins1114

3 ай бұрын

@@AvStuff1 NEGATIVE!

@jgnclvgmng5408

3 ай бұрын

@@wadehiggins1114 Wrong. Apple is actually made in China and Taiwan. It's only designed in the US. And Foxconn is reasonably competent. Tesla is overhyped crap yes. But Volkswagen (dieselgate and of course they were only lying and cutting corners on that) and Mercedes only build crap too these days, and BMW is not far behind. Most consumers are really dumb, and they buy products on image and perception, not verified quality. I do my share of errors too so...

@halahihifo5372

3 ай бұрын

Fuck Airbus! USA! USA! USA! We can agree to disagree!

Once again. If an artillery shell goes farther with a small engine that fills the void behind the shell... why isn't exhaust pushed out the tip of the wing. Not propulsion...void filling, that is fill the vacuum at the tip of the wing with exhaust.!!!???

Just don't mess this plane up, the way you did the 737. I want to believe in, trust, and be proud of Boeing again but what have they done to clear up their internal issues and that poisonous corporate culture that the former McDonnell Douglas executives brought with them in the merger ? Boeing may be on the side of the aurcraft but is it back to the Boeing standards of the 60's, 70's and 80's?. I' m still skeptical .

Just make sure the bolts on the doors are securely fastened in place.

787 flew in 2007, not 2017 😊

@GarlandTexasSpotter2024

3 ай бұрын

It actually flew in 2009, 3 years after its rollout. For 2017, the longer 787-10 variant made its first flight.

It’s criminal that a 757 x had not come to the market. The 737 should be used to compete against the 321/320/220 Airbus. The 757 against the 330, and a rewinged 767 would completely place Airbus on its butt! When on earth is 777x going to be released ? It’s the right time to get this to market to replace the a380’s

@jgnclvgmng5408

3 ай бұрын

Boeing is living on the scraps of orders that Airbus can't take. Airbus backlog is way beyond 2030. If it wasn't Boeing Commercial planes would have closed by now. Sadly new reality, get used to it.

Rather amazed at the flak cast upon Boeing from social media 'press'. The 737 Max door issue was a one-off and proves the airplane's ability to safely recover. It would help if the regulators cleared the way for the MAX-7 & MAX-10. Boeing continues to lead on the leading edge of tech knowledge and application.

@816928

3 ай бұрын

And if that door would have ripped off the horizontal stabilizer what would have happened. They were just lucky sir. They were literal inches away from yet another disaster. This is only one issue Boeing has been struggling with ever since the implementation of the 787. They have been plagued by quality and control issues, labor issues, and management issues. If there were no years long wait lists for Airbus airframes Boeing would be a military contractor only.

@jameswaters3939

3 ай бұрын

@@816928 Probably right about the stabilizer. The flight had Lady Luck aboard. Not sure I see the connection of long wait times and Boeing being a military contractor only. Boeing builds solid equipment and the process of airline operations is a challenge for all involved. We expect success and most times, without incident, it is delivered. Platitudes aside, none of it happens by itself.

@jgnclvgmng5408

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 A one-off thing? Would you think the same if YOU were in that flight? Your relatives? What if you or they would have died? Fantastic epitaph, dead from a "one-off" thing. Boeing was lucky, lucky, lucky. As the other commenter says if the door had damaged any of the tail stabilizers it would have been another story. Or if the plane was higher, because the higher they are, the more dangerous explosive decompressions are. And both United and Alaska found more "one-off" things in other equal planes. Fantastic isn't it? Totally unexpected... The press is being nice to Boeing, not flaking them. They should be totally grilled because they're incompetent crooks, and I'm being generous. The regulators will not clear the 2 new MAXs, and neither the 777x. EASA will see to that, FAA will have to eat it, and Boeing will sulk on it. And "Boeing continues to lead on the leading edge of tech knowledge and application." is absolutely priceless. Yes they lead on incompetence. Yes they lead on lies. But good for them that there are some smart people still believing in them... Boeing is old news, and sadly doing 0 to solve their issues. That is if they're solvable, which is unlikely.

@jameswaters3939

3 ай бұрын

@@jgnclvgmng5408 Captain Eddie Rickenbacker, war ace and later CEO of Eastern, was asked if flying was safe. His reply was, "Flying is reliable".

@jgnclvgmng5408

3 ай бұрын

@@jameswaters3939 Brilliant quote... Boeing should adopt it as their motto. Or better launch an airline and use it as your motto, I can assure you success is a no-brainer. I would like to think that aviation has evolved a lot since the 60's and 70's and it was still young and planes had tons of unfortunate accidents. But great for you that you prefer those old days. Boeing is likely to have several planes that they can sell you that are reliable. Not safe though. Nah, but safety isn't important, isn't it...

I hope this brings Boeing’s decline to an end, however, until Boeing reduces its dependence on outsourcing its manufacturing, it is exposed to inferior assembly

Revolutionary like 737 max😂 boeing show whole world how america function.

in a monopolistic industry complacency is eminent . . . given time . . .

sounds more like a informercial for Boeing than anything else. 777X is years behind schedule and no clear near to medium term to be certified, so this whole "it's greatest ever wide body" argument sound more than a little disingenuous.

Its a bias video...sorry just get your company to get their act all together. Lots of folks died on the 737 max and thsi air craft has been delayed far too long...yes you were once the giant of the skies but you guys got complacent! Now folks would say if it's Boeing I aint flying! That being said I am sure you guys will do your best. Imagine airlines are now going to your plants to check your work. That is not the job of the airlines! It's ridiculous... sorry just being honest...i applaud you for your video but you are an employee of the company. Looks like a commerical indeed ...

A350 owns you

@richardmorris7063

3 ай бұрын

The GE 90 will blow them busses off the tarmac.

@Anand-cx8po

3 ай бұрын

Still waiting @@richardmorris7063

Nope! They are Still Woke and DEI. reputation won't take off soon!! 🤔☹️