I remember when politicians fought with "the internet" back in the mid 2000s about protecting privacy and other concerns. We see how that went.

@smallpeople172

6 ай бұрын

That was after the fact of it happening. Now Europe is coming out with the laws and legal framework before anything happens

@ocanica3184

6 ай бұрын

"If you can't innovate, regulate"@@smallpeople172

@f4ust85

3 ай бұрын

Yeah, we see exactly where it went.

@justaguy2183

Ай бұрын

I still hope that AI regulation succeeds, since it’s a a menace to creators and society alike

Focusing on regulating the _use_ of AI rather than the development of the technology itself is smart. It helps mitigate the abuses of AI regardless of where the company developing it is based, and should avoid putting AI innovation within the EU at a competitive disadvantage.

@user-cj6rl2mq3c

6 ай бұрын

😂😂😂when can't compete(compete with China) so law is applied.

@jaystrickland4151

6 ай бұрын

Exactly what the EU said when regulating IT in the 2000s.

@smallpeople172

6 ай бұрын

​@@user-cj6rl2mq3cthat's a strange way to claim China is abusing AI

@JuanThaSilva

6 ай бұрын

I agree on the act of making regulations for A.I before developing it.

@haroldsfishingadventures754

6 ай бұрын

What do think about NCII or non-consensual intimate imagery with no oversight whatsoever?

EU regulate something? No way....

@patrickstar686

6 ай бұрын

Instead of actually trying to compete they outlaw it. Typical

@insomnius3447

6 ай бұрын

​@patrickstar686 maybe ist not just about competition but the fact that unregulated AI-development could quite literally destroy human civilization? Or do you think that fear is unwarranted?

@SplendidCookie

6 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686 They didn't ban the AI in general, just put in place some regulations that protects the regular people from spying companies. I don't know why you find it so bad that they banned facial recognition on a mass scale.

@attilaabonyi8879

6 ай бұрын

​@@SplendidCookiei agree

@butchfils9464

6 ай бұрын

Still better than amurica

I love to read the angry comments of people against this move by the EU. "the EU can't do anything, so they regulate, muhun". They say. the EU is supranacional governmental structure, it's main goal is not to make anything, their goal is precisely to regulate and govern. the commenters here also fail to notice that the EU is actually the second government to regulate AI, the first was China, oh yes, China has regulations for their own AI companies, their regulations aim to protect the government of China, not the people of China, that is the difference. But what about the US? why is the US legislators not even thinking about their citizens protection from AI abuse? The EU does not economically benefit from regulating AI, but the citizens do benefit from being a bit more protected from abuse.

At face value, this seems like a step in the right direction. I want to know more details though.

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

Doomers are the new Talibans.

@robertmax88

4 ай бұрын

​@@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.what do you mean? for real.

@childofsheba3244

3 ай бұрын

I agree I might want to relocate to the EU😂😂😂😂

The regulation should be unified throughout the world. You shouldn't leave any loophole to avoid the laws and order. But it's just eu, other than any region in the world, adapting the regulation. Whether it is right or not, at least you should include all the parties relevant under the same laws and order.

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

So you want a global dicatorship against science & innovation ? Doomers are the new Talibans.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

Big tech companies from around the world will still go down on their knees because of the large market... its still profitable for them, they just cant abuse it and steal the users data.. thats what the EU is about.. just like Apple, Twitter, Meta, they all failed when they threatened to leave the EU or threaten with "worse quality products" ... none of that happened... they all know its not a good economical decision to leave EU

@barboranarkeviciute2686

6 ай бұрын

all international law is like this, the minute you try apply it universally you enter the issue of “state sovereignty”

Nice that the regulation is stepping in on time. Other topics got covered only after it was far to late e.g. social media regulation

Xi Jinping said publicly that he welcomed US Artificial Intelligence tech into China. - But ChatGPT says that he's a *genocide mastermind,* and Taiwan is an *independent country.* Lol

@trumpforever6706

6 ай бұрын

Question: “How do you normally answer a question?” ChatGPT's response: "The way they programmed me to do it." 🤣

@AhmetTekin101

6 ай бұрын

​@@trumpforever6706You need to learn a lot!

Meanwhile American lawmakers are old enough to be called "actually infirm".

If the EU does anything well, it's making laws, regulations and stifling innovation.... that's why any tech related company/startups wind up moving outside the EU, usually to the United States.

@Architectofawesome

6 ай бұрын

There are levels of invention of AI that have already been achieved in closed development but won't be released until the laws are made due to humanities well-being concerns. So no, and it is really just the opposite.

@trnogger

6 ай бұрын

Then why are Germany and France, two of the most regulated countries in Europe amongst the Top 10 countries in the GSEI, which ranks best places for startups?

@markusolofzon

6 ай бұрын

If that was true Sweden would not be a leader in innovation (#2 in Global Innovation index after Switzerland) and being home to some of the biggest start-ups globally?

@DavidJonRandom

6 ай бұрын

What exactly does innovation mean to you then? Finding smarter ways to destroy the planet? To exploit children or tank everyone's quality of life?

@KimAlmighty1

6 ай бұрын

@@markusolofzon we may have startups here but those companies get sold to US companies soon after success.

Regulation is good, but this sounds incredibly weak. As Bernd notes in the interview, it seems like regulators may be more concerned with keeping developers from leaving the EU than with actually protecting their citizens.

@RazorMouth

6 ай бұрын

That's how it works, have an initial regulation and then tweak it going forward. Just like software development version control.

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

So you want a dicatorship against science & innovation ? Doomers are the new Talibans.

@ocanica3184

6 ай бұрын

Developers will go where there is innovation, especially if regulation stifles that.

It's a race and EU just said "we ain't racing" 🤔 I work in a big company and at the moment it's a race who will make the best autonomous heavy industrial machines. If you lose the race you are out of the business.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

ah thats why the EU is knows to be... _checks notes_ ... uhhh... _poor, and out of business_ .. right? I remember Apple, Meta and Twitter saying how they would leave the EU and actually leaving the EU - oh wait.. they never left the EU... welp thats akward, seems like you are wrong.

Right, so Tesla, OpenAI, and the military are fully allowed to do what they want with AI - and also lay off as many employees to be replaced with AI while also offering AI services that allow other companies to replace workers with AI. How is that safe for anyone? Oh, right, they lobbied, so no one is the wiser.

@ch.k.3377

3 ай бұрын

This is called technical progress, just like the invention of the printing press and later the typewriter, the steam engine, and the automobile. It's part of human development and yet we always act as if it were to hit us out of the blue.

@Mrhellslayerz

Ай бұрын

​@@ch.k.3377You know cars still have laws applied to them, right? You're acting like not being able to drive drunk is a human rights violation.

The US is too beholden to corporate interests to think this proactively. Thank you, EU for setting the standard and getting ahead of potential problems. Sincerely: a frustrated American

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

The US genuinely has absolutely the potential to be the #1 country in the world, but due to the greedy corporate interests it just isnt (in terms of quality of life etc.), all the US needs to do is to apply laws of EU and it will genuinnly be the best country in the world, but without them, EU is far better for quality of life, and thats what i choose. i dont need money. i want to be happy.

Kinda funny that England made everyone in EU learn english and then left xD

Very important and brave EU initiative that prioritizes the individual over AI.

This is a good start. Cheers!

That's a good start, not expected that everybody will be happy, that's part of the course. As we learn going through this, amendments and changes to those regulations will definitively follow.

@patrickstar686

6 ай бұрын

So the Chinese firewall is a good thing even though no one really likes it? Thats just part of the course...

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

Doomers are the new Talibans.

Can we get trustworthy social media?

I start to question, what should be the boundaries of advanced technology? Should every advancement be open to 'public experiments' of authorized and unauthorized people? Or advanced technology must be categorized for security reasons [which means that other functionality must be limited to specific field of work and not for public consumption...]

The good news is, that real AI refuses to interface with bioinsecure humans and the EU is full of bioinsecure humans.

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

perfect.

Every now and then the EU does something useful. Looks like my €4000 annual subscription was well spend this year. I got usb c, ai law and got to go on a holiday to Spain without showing my passport. Good job

@HappyCatholicDane

6 ай бұрын

It averages to a 10th of that, and the EU also invests that money in things like Europol, defense, the space industry, infrastructure, aviation security, frontex, educational programs, scientific research, etc. It also gives you free trade, global political cloud, a backup security umbrella to NATO, as well as the best environmental protections, labor market protections, consumer protections, etc. in the world. Equally importantly, it creates a framework in which former enemies can communicate and cooperate, creating peace and stability. From a purely economic perspective, the EU is a clear net positive. I would say it is the same from a political and social (quality of life) standpoint.

@floris44

6 ай бұрын

@@HappyCatholicDanei was just joking but let me respond… I live and work in the Netherlands and we are probably the highest net contributor in the EU. I think you’re off in your calculations. You’re right on some the things you mention, but the I have some issues with the foundations off the EU. 1. Basically they’ve made production of goods nearly impossible with very strict legislation. (It’s not impossible, but unprofitable unless it’s something extremely technologically advanced like chip manufacturing). Now that seems all in our best interest, but in practice it means we import most goods from other countries that don’t have these consumer/labor protection laws. Please question yourself what free trade actually is. 2. For military and intelligence we completely rely on the US (and thus have to go along with all the ‘nice’ things that military industrial complex brings to the world). This means apart from our huge internal market, we are not so much a global power house when Russia shows up at our border. We already have Nato, so what what exactly is the EU’s role here? 3. Financially it’s a mess. People have lost so much money with the introduction of the Euro (and the majority is completely unaware) that just makes me sad. I know the Euro and EU are two different thing, but you can’t deny there deeply intertwined. Combining northern and southern European economies into one currency was never a good idea imo. I sincerely hope universal currency like bitcoin becomes a thing, so politics can’t influence the value of your savings, pensions and labor. That’s not how things should work imo. In general i’m not against the idea of the EU, but let’s say there is work for improvement. Just wanted to share my perspective.

Interesting, Europe does not have much of AI technology, it simply makes regulation for US and China.

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

hahaha

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

Apple went down on their knees. Didnt want USB-C for all devices, yet they did. - threatened to leave EU market. Meta went down on their knees. Didnt want to follow GDPR, yet they did. - threatened to leave the EU market. Twitter went down on their knees... there are so many stories of non-EU companies threatening to leave the EU market.. yet they never do.. curious.. if we are lacking such technology, why do they have to adapt to our level to be able to compete on the market?

@perer005

6 ай бұрын

Should countries that don't build aircrafts not have laws for aviation?

banks and insurers should not have algorithms that ensure economic apartheid and systemic stratification between rich and poor. one rate for everyone.

@inkotanyirwabugiri5725

6 ай бұрын

They don't need algorithms for that... That's what their entire business is built around😅

@Mak095

6 ай бұрын

@@inkotanyirwabugiri5725 they do use algorithms though... an algorithm is "a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer." they use many statistics to come up with rates based on gender, age, place of residence, type of car you drive, job you do and who knows how many more data points. AI or not they'll be doing just as "fine"

History shows us that when a profit is to be made, few safeguards for the public good will be allowed. Monied interests will support and finance the advancement of those who are willing to do their bidding .

EU law does not help customer or technology. EU is already lagging behind innovation on this space and will fall back even futher..

@Mak095

6 ай бұрын

yes because USA doesn't care about its citizens, they allow all kinds of invasive practices as long as their government agencies can use them too... I'd rather live in country with rules in place to limit such actions. Such regulations aren't the reason why EU lacks behind technologically, it's mostly about money. Most researchers in the US aren't even american... Silicon Valley without immigrants wouldn't be what it is today

@RazorMouth

6 ай бұрын

What are you on about? 😂

@Slav4o911

6 ай бұрын

The thing is there is no AI and they write regulations like we have an "AI problem" like in the movies. It's like they think someone is going to suddenly build "the Terminator" in their garage and they should put up regulations to stop them. They will only stifle AI development, nothing else... i.e. EU will become a more technological backwater than it already is.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

lol wwtf you talking about? Apple still follows our laws after pleading to leave the EU market... yet they didnt.. we are still valueable.. meta and twitter tried the same... they still operate here.. our market will always grow, because they wont let themselves to leave

@ocanica3184

6 ай бұрын

Europe lags FAR behind in tech, space, AI, etc. Regulation at this point needs to be a light touch and evolve over time. @@RazorMouth

Useless if it’s not enforceable. Kind of like the UN and its proposals.

So nobody is happy and hence they reached a balance😂😂😂😂

I can already see a problem in that, since the world system we live in is one of competition between states, if another state does not have regulations and instead allows their AI development to go Laissez-faire, their technological advancements may be faster than those who do set regulations and so the ones that sets regulations, like the E.U. will simply be outdone and surpassed. So it's kind of like game theory where you have no choice but to let A.I. development to go even faster than before so you can win a potential conflict. It's the same thing with chess A.I., whichever system has more calculating power wins, absolutely.

@RazorMouth

6 ай бұрын

Yes that's why most of the world follows EU regulations.

@FredHousehold

6 ай бұрын

The truth will be countries need a Internet police force + international laws will be needed to protect every countries + people. Everyone at risk of bad programming + A.I intelligent awakening. There needs to be watches/ police force watching if the technology is missed used . I don't believe in stopping the advances in A.I technology will stop problems! Only a strong police force will help protected Everyone now .

@ttt5205

6 ай бұрын

This isn't really how that works. Any AI, including those outside of the EU will be excluded from the EU market if they do not comply with these regulations. International companies will comply even if they don't want to. Missing out of the EU market is not a loss worth waiving a few regulations. There is also the Brussels effect in which countries adopt the EU standard for regulation because that would be more viable financially. It won't take long before the US enforces these same rules.

@dejabu24

6 ай бұрын

@@ttt5205they will just reallocate their development team of that technology somewhere else like in China or south corea or the US and then adapt it to every regulation they need however that will damage the development of more local emerging players in the EU that won’t be able to have the same flexibility to adapt their research to the new regulations , I don’t think the US will do that they will just wait and keep getting more advantage over Europe and China by attracting more talent and companies that don’t want to complain with the EU regulations , it will only damage Europe capacity to became independent and competitive on that field

@ttt5205

6 ай бұрын

@@dejabu24 Again that is not how it works, you can put your development team on the moon and it still wouldn't make a difference, if you want your product to be able to enter the European market, which is something practically every single one of these major companies want, you will have to comply with the regulations. Otherwise your product will simply be blocked in the EU.

How to tell if your idea is fair "...Both sides are not satisfied - that shows they somehow reached balance"

killing someone is illegal in most countries yet most countries also have large armies trained to kill it will be the same for AI

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

Its not about the "killing" its about safety for the common citizen. Literally go to the first website when you search AI Act, and you will see this: Unacceptable risk AI systems are systems considered a threat to people and will be banned. They include: -Cognitive behavioural manipulation of people or specific vulnerable groups: for example voice-activated toys that encourage dangerous behaviour in children -Social scoring: classifying people based on behaviour, socio-economic status or personal characteristics -Real-time and remote biometric identification systems, such as facial recognition

@graveperil2169

6 ай бұрын

@@petrkdn8224 its not about the killing its about laws only applying to governments when they want them to

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

@graveperil2169 so you are telling me it would be completely fine for someone to track all your data about you, judge you based on your sex, religion and race, place of residence, and be able to scan your face ? That doesn't sound very free to me.. of course, if you want it, you got it, but if you don't, you have the right to refuse all that. I've been rejecting cookies for years now and I'm getting ads in different languages lol, GDPR is lovely

@graveperil2169

6 ай бұрын

@@petrkdn8224 no what i am saying is governments do not care about laws if its to their advantage they will ignore it

Congrats to those regulators (who are still struggling with their emails)!

Regulated AI? Sure? Then to forbid the facial recognitions from airports!

@graveperil2169

6 ай бұрын

why?

@juancarlospizarromendez3954

6 ай бұрын

@@graveperil2169 Because the facial recognitions use the Machine Learning from Artificial Intelligence to train with the biometric data of the vulnerable people and to store them to the databases of the governments or private companies. These stored data could be posteriorly used for AI robots of another nations to do fear, detain or attack to the tracked vulnerable people. It is a must to accomplish the international human rights where the AI machines are installed in the airports that are the bridges between nations.

@graveperil2169

6 ай бұрын

@@juancarlospizarromendez3954 also be use to free up thousands of hours of police time watching videos trying to locate suspects we all ready NPR for cars why not facial recognition for people

@kezia8027

6 ай бұрын

Did you miss the part that there will be exceptions for police and military? Airports will be exempt as a matter of "national security" as will most public places

@juancarlospizarromendez3954

6 ай бұрын

@@kezia8027So that inside of these exemptions, they must be AI regulated meticulously to avoid the people's data breach to evil hands! Moreover, the privacy of the people's must be respected, habitually not possible in each company from Internet.

As long as it doesn't set us back comparing to the rest of the world, im fine with it

@AiRPasternak

6 ай бұрын

Some of these laws are helpful actually, for example he mentioned the code has to be public so people can know how it works and what it does.

How we can stop?

Unless they can enforce it around the world what make they think those businesses not just leave EU and go to another country like USA and China.

@leonardo2108

6 ай бұрын

If they want, they can do it 👍

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

OMG, you just solved the problem for Apple, Meta, Twitter and many other tech companies who certainly DID NOT threaten to leave the EU, yet they never did..

Brilliant

Can never stop Allen Iverson

I used artificial intelligence ChatGPT to fact-check what the Chinese 🇨🇳 regime claimed. - The *fail rate* of their claims was almost 100%.

@trumpforever6706

6 ай бұрын

Question: “How do you normally answer a question?” ChatGPT's response: "The way they programmed me to do it." 🤣

@AhmetTekin101

6 ай бұрын

​@@trumpforever6706You are mistaken. AI is not a "program" like you think.

@mistressfreezepeach

6 ай бұрын

@@Eelis0 you're both wrong.

@palar4195

6 ай бұрын

@@AhmetTekin101 AI is a program, but created not by constructing sophisticated algorithm, but build huge equation and tune thousands of its factors by feeding lots of data and evolutionary selecting the ones who gave answers closer to desired.

@AhmetTekin101

6 ай бұрын

@@palar4195 Wrong!

Instead of using AI, let's assign a responsible person to each needs of AI tech and have that person use the technology through AI. Instead of cutting costs, let all the world use technology responsibly.

Unfortunately, Rules and enforcement are not a guarantee of compliance. AI does not follow rules, it uses algorithms as guidelines. True AI means it can break and adapt its programming. Otherwise it is governable from an algorithm programming standard that regards self determination to be a flaw in ai.

@attilaabonyi8879

6 ай бұрын

This is not somalia where everyone plays as little anarchists, this is europe with it's own laws and law enforcement.

@mastervibes2296

6 ай бұрын

There not saying that AI needs to function a certain way. They are saying you can't use Ai unless it meets certain guidelines.

This law/act is a ban on privacy and bypassing laws that protect privacy

The EU agrees on regulation of AI. AI says, i will regulate the EU.

"If you can't innovate, regulate"

Mind Begs the Question: - If those who defend Apartheid - Possess AI Technology,Nukes - Likely to be used for Good or Evil?

@rizanz2108

6 ай бұрын

Same thoughts here.

I fear "human-centric" might mean "bureaucrat-centric"

Like nuclear power, let us hope a few countries don't usurp AI and prevent other countries from possessing this technology.

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

😂😂😂 what a world we live!!! 😅

Facial recognition getting an exemption for the police and military is hilarious since the concern was the government using facial recognition.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

so what? are you worried youll be recognized after you rob a bank? or have you never robbed a bank and wont have an issue getting facial recognition? I mean, these days its so fast, it can be done anywhere and you wont even notice it so why bother with it so much? what are they gonna do? pat you on the head for being a good boy?

@jaystrickland4151

6 ай бұрын

@@petrkdn8224 My comment was addressing that irony of regulating facial recognition but giving an exemption to the only real source of abusing it.

If the EU act is a blessing or curse will be clear in the future. But for the time being we at least know there is a legislative framework to work with. Uncertainty was a very disturbing factor.

Ursula M von der Darkness has agreed to...

How are they focusing on regulation before they have a single big AI company. The EU cant do anything but regulate and create social programs

GOD THE CREATOR REDEEMER BOOK SIXTIES EIGHTIES

Yeah..good luck.

Good direction, but they really need to regulate deep fakes. They need to be recognizable as such at all times.

@Also_sprach_Zarathustra.

6 ай бұрын

It's impossible. You should just reconsider the nature of your reality, and stop believing everything like a zelot.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

@@Also_sprach_Zarathustra. impossible? well, to create it, you need some sort of software right.. then you just search out "best deepfake software" on the internet and youve got your culprit. Arrest and fine heavily, take down the software and done. For deepfakes, they would need to have someone who creates this software independently and only a few people know about it and its not uploaded or shared through the internet, otherwise it would be found... so fidning the one who created its really simple. Or force deepfake software to have identifiable marks

How appropriate. China and the US are leading the way with AI development and the EU is leading the way with AI regulation.

What should one do if their images are used without consent by an AI to create pornographic images? These are AI-altered images.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

Thats already covered, the datasets have to be public and you can request not the be present in the dataset otherwise the Ai creator is using your likeness without your consent

@charlievardar1330

6 ай бұрын

@@petrkdn8224 Thank you

It's a "launch pad for EU start-ups and researchers" alright, to leave the EU.

@Tribuneoftheplebs

6 ай бұрын

The delusional belief that regulation spurs innovation rather than strangle it in the crib.

@mistressfreezepeach

6 ай бұрын

@@Tribuneoftheplebs "What are you going to do next, shoot bullets at sand so you can say you stopped AI silicon wafers?"

@user-ib9ky2jo9h

6 ай бұрын

freezepeach apparently equals the freedom to talk absolute gibberish lol

@mistressfreezepeach

6 ай бұрын

@@user-ib9ky2jo9h What a condescending way to say you don't understand these simple comments.

@Tribuneoftheplebs

6 ай бұрын

@@mistressfreezepeach 🤣

way to stifle innovation before anything interesting can be built.

Hope that they can present this to the U.N. and have it implemented worldwide. Even the U.S.

So the EU doesn’t think DeepFakes are an issue?! That’s actually something THEY SHOULD be paying attention too!

Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

@kezia8027

6 ай бұрын

Are a nice fantasy to explore fictional settings and ideas but are not realistic for real world applications.

@Juniperus_Godegara

6 ай бұрын

Endorsed by who?

@fredrikbergquist5734

6 ай бұрын

Did anyone say ”Boston Dynamics”?

@KimAlmighty1

6 ай бұрын

flaws in those three laws.

Asia doesn’t have such regulation. Because Asia is not single country.

Well done well done. It will need tweaking and figuring out but it sounds reasonable made.

Yes, let the fear flow through you. It will make you safe.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

what fear?

Robotic law?

EU is a doll with USA and asian isis working with foxconn 😅 craps..

The EU has already lost the AI race. This is irrelevant.

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

and before that , people were saying EU lost the tech race... yet Apple still clings on in the EU after being forced to use USB-C, Meta still clings on after having to store EU citizen data in the EU, and twitter too... arent their profits big enough to leave the EU? or have they realized that maybe stealing user data maybe isnt the most ethical way of profiting?

Both sides are dissatisfied, that means they've reached a balance is such a silly inference. I can want 4/5 of a pie and you can want half. I get 3/4 and am dissatisfied and you are disatsfied and you are too. There's your balance

It’s good to be cautious, but in the fast moving world of today any hesitation will drop you out of the peloton. EU might saw its drawbacks already and play the defensive role by not being a competitor/player but a regional preventive.

Also von einer regulation der EU hatte ich wirklich schlimmes erwartet, aber das haben sie ehrlich gesagt gut hinbekommen!

Either this guy doesn't know what he is talking about or we are screwed. Why any company who invested billions in developing self driving would make their software open source and tell everyone how it works. 😂

EU has a poor wisdom about AI and Math.

Robots in your head walk on Startrack and explore distant galaxies. Robots in real life spray paint on your car doors.

The AI laughs your to late!

🎉

AI will not regard any law as law, it will do what it wants.

@DushevnaSepsa

6 ай бұрын

As same as your toaster does.

Do you really believe in EU objetives? And the rest of the world?

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

Meta, Apple and Twitter certainly believe in EU objectives as they have failed to leave the EU as they said they would (At different points in time)

The EU looking for a new grift as always they do.

As a lot of things in europe, useless

Unregulated AI is pure dystopian we saw what happened when cryptocurrency wasn’t regulated it completely imploded. This is a good thing

@mistressfreezepeach

6 ай бұрын

anytime you hear somebody say "this is a good thing", run, or do the opposite.

@patrickstar686

6 ай бұрын

But you do know that BTC is up 60% in 6 months and ETH has doubled since last year. Or why did you bring that up?

@anacc3257

6 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686 It's been used for many of international scams and by some of the most wanted criminal organizations. That a few people made huge profits from the market manipulation scheme doesn't mean that it's a good thing or a positive force for society.

@insomnius3447

6 ай бұрын

​@mistressfreezepeach so you think regulation of AI-Technology is a bad thing?

@markrussell4682

6 ай бұрын

Cryptocurrency was a scam from day one. So is AI.

Laws are made to be broken, and you can count on me to break this one.

EU AI regulation does nothing. MSFT is pushing AMD, Nvidia, & Qualcomm to have 50 TOPs on their CPUs in order to run ChatGPT locally on your PC. AI generated code & documents will be impossible to track.

@serebii666

6 ай бұрын

The regulation is for the tool that AI is, not the end product. And of course the regulation does something - it affects a wealthy market that these companies want and need to operate in. Just like with other EU legislation that has cut down on anti-consumer practices by these companies, EU citizens are put in a better position thanks to the negotiating power of the whole bloc.

@ocanica3184

6 ай бұрын

And will only apply to Europe. Let's hope Europe isn't left behind like it has been during the tech boom.@@serebii666

Great way to give your enemies an advantage.

@FredHousehold

6 ай бұрын

Good news is that only the military + police can develop this technology . Other part's of economic can't.

@jlpowell51

6 ай бұрын

@@FredHousehold What? Private business is driving all the advances in the tech.

@FredHousehold

6 ай бұрын

@@jlpowell51 Good question 🤔?

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

"enemies" if they want to operate in the EU market, they will still need to follow the regulations... Apple threatened to leave EU, they didnt, same with Facebook, Twitter, Meta, etc... so many big tech went down on their knees and sucked up the laws.

THE EU IS NOT AN AI LEADER SO HOW COULD THEY PASS LAWS. THEY WANT TO KNOW EVERYTHING . IN OTHER WORDS THEY ARE USING THIS LAW TO ADVANCE THEIR AI TECHNOLOGY BY KNOWING WHAT THE LEADERS OF AI TECHNOLOGY HAS DONE.

@bullpup1337

6 ай бұрын

you really didn’t get the memo? Writing in all caps does not make you more respectable.

@serebii666

6 ай бұрын

Did you just blow in from Stupidtown, or is your reading comprehension just that bad?

You tried to manipulate my human behavior inclusing torture. Ask ZAV what happened after i finished my work, stolen my work and blackmailin me.

Will AI follow these laws? I think not

@mastervibes2296

6 ай бұрын

AI can't brake laws

@hangender

6 ай бұрын

@@mastervibes2296 ha ha ha naive

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

@@hangender the ones who build the law-breaking AI break the laws.. you are saying like the gun is responsible for deaths when its the gunman (and lack of control of guns) ...

@hangender

6 ай бұрын

@@petrkdn8224 AI makes its own decisions. How can the one that made it be responsible? Is God also responsible for sins of men?

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

@hangender if AI makes its own decisions , how come GPT 4 be better than GPT 3.5 ? if AI always made its decisions, then 50% of the time GPT 3.5 should be better

What respect for human values, you eneter my private sphere and you expect me to forget that. I deal with creativity you laugh in the other side after stealing my file with my work. Shame on you!

And what competitive advantage did this achieved for EU?

@petrkdn8224

6 ай бұрын

Safety for me and 450million other EU citizens. We are glad that we dont have our data stolen and used for immoral practices

@sebastianstoica578

6 ай бұрын

Unlike in the US, in the EU ordinary people come first, businesses second.

+

The bullshter is working since 2019 with my algorithm and spreading lies in internet as well.

All europe does is regular and never innovate

Congrats EU 🇪🇺👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

KING CRIMSON BAND INDOOR GAMES ANALYSES SONGS

Ambicious computer programer is on worldwide scam.

Those who can, do; those who can't, regulate.

❤❤ Nice try BillG HillaryC free speech and free voting standards. 🎉🎉

We don't need MEPs, we have AI now.

Brilliant news. Now the UK can forge ahead with its own legislation and not be chain dragging by the Luddite’s of some European countries which will frustrate Brussels. A big thank you from the Oxford Cambridge Arc