The Creature with Eyes More Complex Than a Camera Lens!

Ғылым және технология

Paleontologist Marcus Ross discusses extinct trilobites and other incredible evidences for complexity on display throughout the fossil record. Watch the full video and 19 more in our series "Beyond Is Genesis History?: Rocks and Fossils": bit.ly/bighvol1
Visit our website for more resources on creation science and young earth creation: isgenesishistory.com
Series Synopsis:
𝘉𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺? explores rocks and fossils, intelligent design, astronomy, and so much more! These fascinating segments are approximately 20 minutes each and include an incredible depth of material not included in the film. They are perfect for families, churches, schools, and homeschools wanting to learn how Genesis explains the world around us.
Del Tackett, DM created the Truth Project in 2005 with @focusonthefamily
Marcus Ross, PhD is an educator and founder of @cornerstoneeducationalsupp1349
#bible #creation #genesis #youngearth #science #christianity#creation #rocks #fossils

Пікірлер: 100

  • @__WJK__
    @__WJK__3 ай бұрын

    "Eyes to see and ears to hear" ... indeed!

  • @Buy_YouTube_Views_a135
    @Buy_YouTube_Views_a1353 ай бұрын

    This is the kind of content that makes me believe in a better tomorrow.

  • @derekdaugherty3611
    @derekdaugherty36113 ай бұрын

    Love it

  • @HereIam-rg3vy
    @HereIam-rg3vy3 ай бұрын

    Evolution is incredible,I love true science

  • @jesus4400
    @jesus44003 ай бұрын

    'Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a fantasy.' - Charles Darwin. Life and letters.

  • @sciencerules2825

    @sciencerules2825

    3 ай бұрын

    What Darwin said or thought 160 years ago is irrelevant to modern evolutionary theory.

  • @bobwehadababyitsaboi103
    @bobwehadababyitsaboi1033 ай бұрын

    Darwin invented evolution first, then did his best to make the facts fit his narrative.

  • @kathleennorton2228

    @kathleennorton2228

    3 ай бұрын

    And his protégés have been following closely in his footsteps ever since.

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    Darwin didn't invent evolution. Evolution had been observed before for thousands of years by humans. Darwin was just the first to publish a proposed *mechanism* for the observed changes in species.

  • @franceshaypenny8481

    @franceshaypenny8481

    3 ай бұрын

    He said himself that ''if you ever find biological machinery, my theory would necessarily fall to the ground.'' So, it's the Neo-Darwinists who shoehorn their wishes and hopes into Darwin's original theory. They even try to act as though the discovery of DNA proves Darwinian evolution, when it actually does the opposite.

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    @@franceshaypenny8481 DNA is the mechanism for inheritance which Darwin surmised but didn't know what was the cause. Everything we've learned about genetics in the last 70+ years strongly supports evolutionary theory

  • @jimhughes1070

    @jimhughes1070

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@kittykatters3972I'm afraid that is wildly incorrect sir 😭😭💰🤣👍

  • @BabyBoomersDoomer
    @BabyBoomersDoomer3 ай бұрын

    ❤❤❤

  • @amel2784
    @amel27843 ай бұрын

    Right. Complexity from rhe beginning, really. Darwin didn't have the advantage science has today in order he might have this type of knowledge but there's no excuse for those alive today who still cling to his original ideas as their basis..

  • @bookofrevelation4924

    @bookofrevelation4924

    3 ай бұрын

    Yes, hard to explain. Darwin was first with ability to gather the information to present an appearance of evolution from one species to another, but a falsehood can very closely appear as truth if only even very little information is missing to complete the full picture. Surely, the first person with ability to start presenting a theory cannot have enough information to complete the full picture of such an issue in such short time using intelligence.

  • @kathleennorton2228

    @kathleennorton2228

    3 ай бұрын

    Yes, at his time they thought that cells were essentially just living blobs. I am sure that he would not have even contemplated his theory if he knew half of what we know today.

  • @bookofrevelation4924

    @bookofrevelation4924

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kathleennorton2228 yes, I agree. Just was thinking I've read that most people that generate theories also say they could be found wrong over time with more evidence and knowledge. But leaders economic and political find ways to use some of these theories to their advantage at times as motivation to perpetuate them. Some times theories are correct, or amended to be corrected, or false.

  • @__WJK__

    @__WJK__

    3 ай бұрын

    While it's true Darwin didn't have the "advantage of knowledge" that science offers today, it's always been very clear/very well known that Darwin's "Origin Of Species" is based on theory NOT scientific fact, even though 10s of millions of people (including modern academics) continue to believe, imply, and teach that "Origins Of Species" is based more on fact, which is absolutely, positively NOT true. No matter what position one takes, or agendas one wants to push (regarding Darwin's Origin of Species) a theory cannot become scientific fact (and shouldn't be taught as one) until said theory has been fully tested and proven factually true via the scientific method ... to take any other position actually cheapens the field of science.

  • @sciencerules2825

    @sciencerules2825

    3 ай бұрын

    @@__WJK__ That evolution has occurred - the changes and diversification of life over deep time - is a well established scientific fact. The theory of evolution is the scientific explanation for the mechanisms which produced the observed fact of evolution.

  • @SophiaVonHelgastein
    @SophiaVonHelgastein3 ай бұрын

    God is the most wonderfully awesome designer.

  • @konsul2006

    @konsul2006

    3 ай бұрын

    "God" designer? A lot of effed up designs tho? Your God seems like a drunk at times! Nah, evolution is the designing force here. Who ever or what ever made evolution a think we as humans will almost certeinly never know. Parroting "God is the designer" is just a horrible "cop out".

  • @franceshaypenny8481
    @franceshaypenny84813 ай бұрын

    DNA had to exist for anything to exist and DNA is a complex code, a language, a blueprint, a program. A single cell is complex from the beginning, not over time. If it were not, nothing would be. Darwin had no idea such things existed.

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    No. There is considerable evidence RNA existed before DNA. Imperfect self replicating molecules also existed before complete cells did. There is a whole area of science which investigates prebiotic evolution you seem to be blissfully unaware of. 🙂

  • @statutesofthelord

    @statutesofthelord

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kittykatters3972kitty, "Evolution hasn't been observed whle it's happening."

  • @sciencerules2825

    @sciencerules2825

    3 ай бұрын

    @@statutesofthelord What a silly claim. I've observed evolution while it is happening. So have millions of other scientists.

  • @franceshaypenny8481

    @franceshaypenny8481

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kittykatters3972 An RNA world theory is only conjecture. In any case - RNA isn't a simplistic tinker toy either, but highly complex. What has to happen before a single protein can come into being rules out accidental life too. The microscopic world consists of a megalopolis within a megalopolis of constantly working microscopic factories which could not have formed over some great expanse of time, dependent upon countless happy accidents. Mutations don't work that way. Positive mutations are too rare.

  • @sciencerules2825

    @sciencerules2825

    3 ай бұрын

    @@franceshaypenny8481 Arguments from personal incredulity don't work in science. Where is your evidence beneficial mutations are "too rare"?

  • @ji6824
    @ji68243 ай бұрын

    우리는 창조되었습니다. 우리는 유인원에서 진화한 것이 아닙니다. 하나님이 있다고 믿습니다. 창조주가 있다고 믿습니다.

  • @truthbebold4009

    @truthbebold4009

    3 ай бұрын

    Amen! God bless you! Is that Korean language?

  • @konsul2006
    @konsul20063 ай бұрын

    More complex? Are we forgetting about the eyes of just normal flies here? How are those fossils more complex? It just donsn't sound good to me.

  • @itmaster3805
    @itmaster38053 ай бұрын

    Vastly Complex creation in very low fossil layers. Only a Supreme Designer Entity could be responsible. I AM is His name, the Voice from the burning bush

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    When you can't support your claims with science just say it was done by MAGIC! Works every time. 😄

  • @itmaster3805

    @itmaster3805

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kittykatters3972 "Science" cant even support its claims in evolution. So many gaps, missing links, ignoring the last decade of genomics discoveries, etc. The MAGIC of evolution just cant be observed, which is the Foundation of true science. YOU are the one that requires so much FAITH for your religion

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    @@itmaster3805 What in the fossil and genetic record disproves evolution? Please be specific. BTW people have been observing evolution for thousands of years. It's just now we understand the mechanisms which cause it.

  • @itmaster3805

    @itmaster3805

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kittykatters3972 In the world of DNA, simple organisms cannot become more complex without the added DNA information. Where does the added information come from? That should destroy "evolution" right there. It doesnt happen! Where are all the specific fossils of "almost" creatures that are "in between" and are becoming a different creature ? Haven't been discovered yet??? DONT GO THERE! Tell me how the very beginning of life, that came from a STERILE medium, brought forth LIFE. It can't be reproduced! The presence of oxygen destroys basic proteins trying to bond. While you are at it, explain why an organism (No, it has to be a GROUP of the same organisms) will supposedly hang on to a useless mutation that they all had at the same time (one that makes part of an eye) for a few MILLION YEARS and then those same GROUP of organisms have another USELESS mutation of another part of an eye (which still doesnt work) for millions of MORE years... and this goes on for many, many, many more millions of years until the eye starts to work???? ALL USELESS parts until all of a suddenly the eye works??? It's ludicrous. Consider THAT with the other subsystems to your "mutation of parts" theory--- immune system, reproductive system, circulatory, respiratory, etc...Take any One part of any of those systems away and they are useless. Irreducible complexity absolutely destroys evolution.

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    @@itmaster3805 _Where does the added information come from?_ The empirically observed process of gene duplication followed by additional SNP mutations to the copy produces entirely new genetic sequences and entirely new features. That's entirely new genetic information by anyone's definition. This is extremely well documented in the scientific literature too.

  • @kittykatters3972
    @kittykatters39723 ай бұрын

    Let's talk about trilobites! Trilobites aren't a single species. They are an entire taxonomic *class* of animals consisting to 10 orders, over 5000 genera, and over 24,000 known species. They evolved eyes independently at least 3 times with 3 different eye "designs". The earliest simple examples are found in the Cambrian around 521 MYA. In the subsequent almost 270 million years they evolved greater complexity and diversified into the large variations mentioned. Trilobites finally went extinct 252 MYA during the Permian mass extinction. Trilobite fossils have been found on all 7 continents but have *NEVER* been found in strata above the end of the Permian. Anyone here want to give the Creationist explanation for all that diversity in trilobites over all that time, or their pattern in the fossil record?

  • @bibelschnipseltv

    @bibelschnipseltv

    3 ай бұрын

    Trilobites, anyone?

  • @franceshaypenny8481

    @franceshaypenny8481

    3 ай бұрын

    You have not in any way argued against Design. Reproduction, Environment, Diversity - all normal parts of life. Who is claiming otherwise?

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    No one wants to explain why trilobites had 3 completely different types of eyes: holochroal, schizochroal, and abathochroal? What happened to the "common designer"?

  • @kittykatters3972

    @kittykatters3972

    3 ай бұрын

    @@franceshaypenny8481 How did we go from a few trilobite species to over 24,000 distinct species in only 1600 years from creation week to the Flood? Why are no trilobites ever found in strata later than the Permian?

  • @statutesofthelord

    @statutesofthelord

    3 ай бұрын

    @@kittykatters3972kitty, your surmisings regarding how God could have or couldn''t have created this world are totally unnecessary, as God has already told us that he spoke everything into existence in 6 days, and rested the 7th.

  • @SavedbyGraceAlone1962
    @SavedbyGraceAlone19623 ай бұрын

    Evolution - impossible. Non-existence of a creator God - impossible

  • @barend4803
    @barend48033 ай бұрын

    O the lies, the lies of evolution theory.

  • @konsul2006

    @konsul2006

    3 ай бұрын

    Some evolve backwards, so sad to see! Didn't know education was that difficult! So sorry for you.

  • @Blues2green

    @Blues2green

    3 ай бұрын

    ⁠@@konsul2006 you guys always try to attack intelligence, which is funny because we all grew up learning the same thing and now you’re forced to think in our direction and it messes with you? If you’re a scientist, you take many theories right buddy? Whatever dude And yeah, the guy is probably a little angry because the new atheist revolution that stormed America has caused so much moral decline and now people are killing themselves and I wonder why? Could it be that maybe they think they have no meaning at all? They’re not gonna go anywhere? It sickens me you guys treat this as just whatever but it has consequences! The only thing Christianity has done is it has made the world better. Sometimes it doesn’t much like many things, but it has done far more good than evolution ever will! Go type in when carbon dating is accurate up to 60,000 thousand years…go look! Do you see a problem there? I typed in when is carbon dating no longer accurate(I’m sure you’ll say it’s a biased article when it’s the first article that pops up on the most conservative of platforms google chrome)

  • @konsul2006

    @konsul2006

    3 ай бұрын

    @@Blues2green "you guys"? Grow up! I get to my thinking through education and personal observations just like everyone else. Try to look a bit outside your religious universe, try to look up at the stars. The furthest out we can see is about 46.5 billion light years away and so far no God in sight... The universe doesn't care about carbon dating lol! That doesn't prove evolution wrong! We don't live long enough that it even matter to us on a personal level. Believe what you want XD - "we all grew up learning the same thing" well I think some have a very poor education!

  • @Blues2green

    @Blues2green

    2 ай бұрын

    @@konsul2006 you don’t just get to see God even if you don’t believe at the great white throne judgment, there’s nobody sitting in the throne. I wonder why? Because that is a gift so, even if you don’t believe you won’t be able to see or your God, and that honestly sounds sad as hell. Most of people on here have been insightful minds to wanna know how things were, and they’re not even gonna talk to THEE SCIENTIST!

Келесі