The BEST and WORST Vintage Olympus 28mm Lens, f/2, 2.8, 3.5 Showdown | Round Glass Review
Тәжірибелік нұсқаулар және стиль
Olympus Zuiko OM 28mm lenses were highly regarded in their time. This vide compares the three film-era Zuiko 28mm lenses -- the Olympus Zuiko 28mm f/2, Olympus Zuiko 28mm f/2.8, and Olympus Zuiko 28mm f/3.5. These lenses carry vastly different prices, so is the price premium on the f/2 worth it? Is the f/3.5 really the worst?
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @davidhancock
David Hancock's Amazon Author Page with Links to Select Camera Manual eBooks:
www.amazon.com/David-Hancock/...
Video Index:
0:00 - Intro
1:05 - Vintage Olympus Zuiko 28mm Lens Showdown Specifications
2:02 - Vintage Olympus Zuiko 28mm Lens Showdown Lens Diagrams
2:31 - Vintage Olympus Zuiko 28mm Lens Showdown Performance Comparison
10:39 - Vintage Olympus Zuiko 28mm Lens Showdown Video Use
11:56 - Vintage Olympus Zuiko 28mm Lens Showdown Ranking
Lens Showdown: Vintage 28mm f/3.5 Lenses Compared and Tested | Round Glass Review
• Lens Showdown: Vintage...
Olympus G. Zuiko Auto-W 28mm f/3.5 (Can a Budget 28mm Lens Take Good Photos?) | Round Glass Review
• Olympus G. Zuiko Auto-...
The Best and Worst Vintage Olympus 28mm Lens, f/2, 2.8, 3.5 Showdown | Round Glass Review
• The BEST and WORST Vin...
References:
Full-resolution Photos: www.smugmug.com/app/organize/...
lens-db.com/olympus-om-zuiko-...
lens-db.com/olympus-om-zuiko-...
lens-db.com/olympus-om-gzuiko...
Cox, Arthur. A Focal Manual of Photo Technique. Thirteenth Edition. New York: Focal Press, 1966.
My Instagram:
/ davidhancock
Пікірлер: 22
I traded my f2.8 for the f2. The 2.8 just felt like it had less character and I liked the idea of an extra stop of light. Even more than that I think the character of the f2 is more pleasing to me. You really can’t go wrong with any of the Olympus lenses from this era though! Thanks for another great video!
@DavidHancock
15 күн бұрын
Thank you! It's definitely fair to say that the 2.8 has less character. 😃
Very useful David. Thanks!
@DavidHancock
13 күн бұрын
Thank you!
I have the f/2 and the f/2.8 and I enjoy them both on my film OM bodies. :-) Thanks for the analysis!
@DavidHancock
13 күн бұрын
Thank you!
Yay, the 28mm showdown I've personaly been waiting for! I'm routing for Zuiko 28mm f/2, since it's the only one of these I have, but it's definitely not a perfect lens, so I expect f/2.8 to be a bit better.
@androoy.p
17 күн бұрын
And I can confirm that Zuiko 28mm f/2 has a floating group, and when it malfunctioned, it was reeeealy noticable.
@DavidHancock
17 күн бұрын
This was an interesting one to make. I'm definitely looking forward to the next.
@1:10, the AoV cell for the 2.8 says "AoV" instead of a number. Was that not available online or not measurable?
@DavidHancock
17 күн бұрын
Dang it. That was a typo because I make these late at night after work. The AoV on all is stated as the same.
28mm is so intresting focal length. Definitely a favourite. On the pen F the 20mm 3.5 is the 28 but stil amzing focal length for vertical photos
@DavidHancock
16 күн бұрын
It's grown on me a bit. I tend to be attracted to 24mm, but the slightly lower amount of scene distortion in 28 is very nice. 28mm on half frame is pretty close to an ideal standard lens.
Would be interesting a comparison between the om 28mm f2 and Pentax m 28mm f2. Since the Pentax should be considered the successor
@DavidHancock
8 күн бұрын
If I get my hands on the Pentax, that would be a fun video.
I have a lens that gives me a soft haze in the middle whenever I shoot with the sky in the back, is there a name for it?, and its only the sky.
@DavidHancock
15 күн бұрын
That's either flare, a hot spot, or a ghost, and it's not possible to say which without seeing it. They all have different causes and preventions. A diffuse bright spot with the aperture open is likely flare. Same but with the aperture closed is probably a hot spot. If the shape is colored and has the shape of the aperture, it's a ghost.
@monsieurgolem3392
15 күн бұрын
@@DavidHancock maybe a hot spot, it just looks washed out in the middle of the photo contains the sky.
tyvm for the video! I own the f/2 so I am obviously a fan of spherical/chromatic/pedantic abomination and I'm getting what I payed for. Or not?
@DavidHancock
17 күн бұрын
Probably are. 😃 Honestly, I think that the f/2 has some serious potential for some uses, more so than the other two.
perhaps showing actual large prints might be more convincing - thanks for the video anyway
@DavidHancock
15 күн бұрын
How would I go about showing large prints to an audience that's something like 60% mobile phone viewers and 37% desktop? I don't know if a technical solution to that which makes large images work. However, for those interested, there's also a link in the video description to the full-res images used in this video.