The best addition to a jointer or planer! 3D printed horizontal cyclone with dust bin.

I found this model on thingiverse and had to give it a try. Almost 4 rolls of filament later and the result is amazing! If you are going to print one, budget for 5kg of filament, just to be sure!
Thingiverse file:
www.thingiverse.com/thing:491...
Original 100% hand made version, this guy is amazing!!!!
• I Made a Centrifugal D...
If you want one printed let me know! PS they take a lot of time and filament.

Пікірлер: 39

  • @PaganWizard
    @PaganWizard27 күн бұрын

    This is a game changer. I especially LOVE being able to combine 3D printing and woodworking.

  • @iporty
    @iporty6 ай бұрын

    Very Cool! Your video showed up in my feed and I thought that looks familiar and then I realized it was my design. Great implementation!

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    6 ай бұрын

    Oh wow! Great work! This setup works really well. I do get some pass through when I open the blast gate right up. Either this needs to be done in a 6” inlet with bigger body or I need two in parallel.

  • @NWGR
    @NWGR11 ай бұрын

    Great job all around. I don't have space in my shop for horizontal dust collection, but I'm building a similar cabinet to house my shop vac for noise reduction. I have the same latches and really like them; they're effective and cheap. The system seems to be working for you, that's great. The more dust collected the better.

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    11 ай бұрын

    Pre separating from the jointer/planer is a must! I thought of an Oneida 4” but had more horizontal than vertical room in this case….

  • @MrDBT85
    @MrDBT858 ай бұрын

    I watched the Under Dunn video some time back and within a few hours had also drawn up a version to 3D print, though as yet it has not yet happened. Perhaps it is finally time.

  • @pauna7
    @pauna76 ай бұрын

    Very interesting, I also made a horizontal dust collector. I want two pairs to work in parallel. You've given me a great idea for a container. You can also see these two dust collectors in my videos.

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    6 ай бұрын

    Very cool!

  • @peterszutu555
    @peterszutu5556 ай бұрын

    I wish I had a 3D printer and the program to make the internal pieces. Great video.

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    6 ай бұрын

    Maybe one day!

  • @davec8141
    @davec81412 ай бұрын

    Wouldn’t the bags(when empty) be sucking up toward the separator and not letting the dust drop straight into the bins ?

  • @seannalexander
    @seannalexander6 ай бұрын

    I ******** love that we can just download a part.

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    6 ай бұрын

    Exactly. Not perfect by any means but done the way I like it. My dust collector is too powerful for just one unit. I get a little too much bypass. I can always just print another!!

  • @SanchirMM
    @SanchirMM8 ай бұрын

    hello such a great job. SHOUT OUT :). Under dunn and You. I've been dreaming of this dust separator. what brand did u use 3d printer? how much time it takes to print?

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    7 ай бұрын

    It was a good week and a half of printing on an old slow cr10s pro v2. I’m sure it would be faster with my voron now. I was pretty nervous on the turbine part as it was a lot of filament!!!!

  • @benjaminreinhardt259
    @benjaminreinhardt259 Жыл бұрын

    I've watched a lot of Under Dunn's stuff. I really enjoy his channel about his automobile collection. He is in process of EV swapping an Escape. Havent watched much of your stuff lately, hope you have been doing well. This is an interesting video. I am impressed you were able to 3D print this thing!

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    11 ай бұрын

    Definitely a cool guy!!! Good to hear from you!

  • @DickvanZanten
    @DickvanZanten5 ай бұрын

    Looks great. How large is the collecting tube diameter you use, 4"? I'm looking for a 6" design 'cause I think these cannot just be scaled linearly....? Like to hear your thoughts. Cheers, Dick

  • @Polar_Ted
    @Polar_Ted11 ай бұрын

    How much filament did this take?

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    11 ай бұрын

    Looking back it was just under 2kg for the clear parts, almost 1 kg for the center turbine part, and another kg for sure for the other parts. I think you could get away with 4 kg but 5 to be sure in case of any oopsies…. PETG appears to be optimal.

  • @Polar_Ted

    @Polar_Ted

    11 ай бұрын

    @@mbwoodbutcher I needed an excuse to buy a 5KG spool of filament lol

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    11 ай бұрын

    That should do you!!!

  • @Tensquaremetreworkshop
    @Tensquaremetreworkshop6 ай бұрын

    This is, of course, a copy of the Harvey G700. Or, rather, it is a copy of a copy- I recognize the version. Unfortunately there is a serious error in this version- the fine dust exhaust needs to be radial to the outside of the tube. The discontinuity on this design spoils the laminar flow of the material, greatly reducing the collection ability. If you measure how much gets through to your filter you will find it is actually inferior to a standard cyclone.

  • @pauna7

    @pauna7

    6 ай бұрын

    Hello. You also saw my version. Is there the same problem? Does this problem affect all horizontal dust collectors?

  • @Tensquaremetreworkshop

    @Tensquaremetreworkshop

    6 ай бұрын

    @@pauna7 No, it is a matter of design. The flow of fine dust around the inside of the tube needs to be able to exit is a straight (tangential) manner- angles at this point destroy the flow. For a great view of the form required, see kzread.info/dash/bejne/k6uazMWuj8edoNI.html This is a completely different design, but you can see how the dust port is tangential to the tube. I believe this to be a crucial design matter, and will radically affect performance.

  • @pauna7

    @pauna7

    6 ай бұрын

    Is it clear now. My manifold is the same as the g700 manifold in details and dimensions. I tried to be as accurate as possible. I just couldn't keep trying to perfect it.

  • @iporty

    @iporty

    6 ай бұрын

    This was my design. I'm interested to try the version that keeps the laminar flow. I was using the video of the g700 when I created it and if I remember correctly it didn't keep the laminar flow. That's why I used this exit design. I only ever tried one design so I never compared it to your suggestion.

  • @Tensquaremetreworkshop

    @Tensquaremetreworkshop

    6 ай бұрын

    @@iporty Fluid flow dynamics are complex. Even commercial designs are subject to considerable testing, to optimize them. However, smooth radial exit is crucial to operation.

  • @turnerhayes5303
    @turnerhayes530311 ай бұрын

    Inspiration: "Under Dunn"

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    11 ай бұрын

    100%!

  • @Poindexters-Obsession
    @Poindexters-Obsession6 ай бұрын

    Six thousand dollars for the jointer/planer!?

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    6 ай бұрын

    Yup, that was the price I paid locally here in Canad BEFORE the price went up. Before taxes they are close to $9k now. Dang prime ministers sock tax…

  • @christophersouza8792
    @christophersouza879211 ай бұрын

    You'd be ahead of the game with the Lee Valley separator if you didn't have so much hose. Do you realize how inefficient that set up is? Not to mention the several loops, not bends loops! As seen your dust extraction is at 50% with all that nonsense. Short runs, never direct 90°, (2) 45° are better.

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    11 ай бұрын

    My issue was not the ability to suck things up, the issue was that nothing stayed in the can. Basically it bypassed the lee valley hood and went through to the main collector.

  • @carlpetitt2241
    @carlpetitt22418 ай бұрын

    Please try to do some basic editing next time, video was WAY too long. Also, at 22:50 it sure looks to me like the size of the chips in both bins is roughly the same. So I think the "fine dust" claim is dubious.

  • @mbwoodbutcher

    @mbwoodbutcher

    8 ай бұрын

    Yeah, just kinda threw this together at the last minute. I have found that full suction from the dust collector just defeats the separation but still diverts a huge portion of planar chips from my main collector.