There are the five translations he mentions at these playtimes: 29:10 NASB 30:22 KJV 37:18 NKJ 39:28 ESV 41:30 NIV

@delbert372

10 ай бұрын

Thank you. Numbers 2 and 3 need replaced with LSB and TNIV.

@justinthyme2666

9 ай бұрын

@@delbert372that’s interesting as I doubt anyone involved with the lsb translation would ever recommend the tniv.

@delbert372

9 ай бұрын

@@justinthyme2666 True, but it’s not their list, it’s mine lol

@justinthyme2666

9 ай бұрын

@@delbert372 fair enough

@judyswiderski2682

9 ай бұрын

The NASB, NIV and ESV quote Jesus in a lie! In John 7:8 he tells his brothers, I am not going to the feast for my time has not yet come. Oh, oh. He is going to break the law of Moses. That eould be a sin. Oh, he waits and then goes to the feast. Liar! BLASPHEMY. . Jedus sumoly ssid, I am not going up yet to the feast. Not now, not yet. He wsits and then goes, no problem, no lie. See: Deadly translation- The "New" kjb.

My husband and I watch almost everyday and study with you. We really enjoy your teachings. We trust you and want to thank you for what you do. God Bless you

Hearing you say this makes me feel better. I’m 50 years old and new to Christianity. I was an atheist up until a few months ago. And people online keep telling me in the comment section how you have to stick with the KJV and everything else is wrong etc. I bought 8 different translations by the way. I’m on my fourth now. But anyhow this one person told me to look at Matthew 7:21 and I will see. So I went on bible gateway and looked it up in a bunch of different versions and have no clue what they are talking about. They all say the same thing. I expected to see it be so utterly devastatingly different and it didn’t make any difference at all. People just like to cause chaos and controversy over nothing. Plus if you don’t understand Shakespeare like language then what good is it to only read the KJV. I’m very much enjoying the NKJV the most out of the four I’ve read so far. I’ve already read the KJV, NIV, ESV and the NKJV is my favourite so far.

@bobdees6428

7 ай бұрын

I went through the same process , but it is very difficult to witness/ share your faith to a nonbeliever in the KJV . I use the Bible app when reading , studying the Bible for me it’s hands down ; NKJV , NLT , AMPC - always comparing with the KJV . I really don’t like the NIV has far too many verses missing/ taken out - the new paraphrasing bible’s actually scare me , it was impossible to keep things in context. If your a new believer keep your head in the Bible , stay away from TV Ministers . There are still a few that are teachers , but the vast majority are showmen, bordering con men. I listen to Chuck Swindol, Raul Ries , John Mac Arthur, David Jeremiah , Voddie Baucham and Tony Evans and Jack Hibbs as you can tell some are conservative and some are a little liberal. I learned to do this so I wouldn’t become pigeon holed into denomination theology. I am on Pinterest ; B.I.C. Just a and I talk daily to a wide variety of believers from super conservative to extreme liberal- always pointing to the scriptures as the main source, not religion

@KMM61873

7 ай бұрын

@@bobdees6428 I definitely don’t listen to tv preachers. I know who the con men are. Even people in my church who are supposed to be so devoted praise Joel Osteen and Joyce Meyer for example and I shake my head. Even I know they are full of it and I’m a beginner. But I also realize Christian’s don’t read the bible. They go to church every Sunday and just listen to what the pastor preaches and that’s it. I’d rather be informed by reading scripture myself than to depend on anybody. That’s how people get conned out of money. Nowhere in the bible does it say if you pay me $5,000 God will bless you. But I guess if you don’t read the Bible yourself you can be conned out of $5,000.

@MegaSage007

6 ай бұрын

It doesn't take long to grasp Olde English. It's worth it.

@SgtKamer

6 ай бұрын

@@bobdees6428Consider adding Alan Nolan to your list of pastors/teachers, he is a solid teacher and I don’t think I’ve ever heard him ask for one dime of money. He’s one of my go-to online pastor/teachers!!

@tomoth77

4 ай бұрын

​@@MegaSage007 actually the kjv is written in modern English. Its just an early version.

I Grew up on the KJV. Currently I'm using NLT and NKJV. I like the NKJV for being poetic and easy to follow along with other translations. I use NLT for daily practical Christianity. It find that the more I read the Bible, the more I want to read it!

@michaelsburger665

6 ай бұрын

please stay with the KJV it is the best translated form the textus Receptus, new bibles use the Greek text is is wrong NKJV why is Jesus God's servant???????? you know it is not true Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities."

@kristinebell3934

4 ай бұрын

I like those two translations but I use a parallel Bible with the KJV for accuracy as in Mark9:29 and Matt 17:21 for fasting. Jesus said when you fast not if you fast..

@bruceanable7739

3 ай бұрын

I’ve read from many different translations,but the one I fall on is NLT

@kristinebell3934

3 ай бұрын

@@bruceanable7739 I prefer a parallel Bilble with KJV and NLT. NLT is readable but KJV is more accurate. See Mark 9:29 re prayer and fasting in KJV.

My moms side is Baptist they use the kjv I went to Episcopal church. They use the nrsv. Today I bought a english standard version. I'm glad I did. It is a blessing to me

Thank you Sir Tiff, I am so blessed by your clear teachings that always added with your wonderful stories and useful advices. God bless you always!

Ha! 😀 Dear brother Tiff - love how you stopped mid-way through and chastised yourself for what you might have said - just goes to show how passionate and sincere you are about one of your favourite books. May God continue to bless you and thanks for sharing your list of five highly recommended versions of the bible.

Thanks for taking time to be very honest and detailed, many christians have concerns and confusion about translations and stick what their pastor tells them but I found there is much greater blessing when we consider others translations especially the ones you just mentioned. Hopefully more Christian go in depth studying the Word of God, great job!!

Evangelist Tiff I love you and appreciate your Bible study’s. I pray for you, your family and Lost Lamb ministries ❤️

Recommended Bible Translation. NASB. The most formal equivalents (word for word), but hard to read. Suitable for serious Bible College student and scholars. The others 5: 1. KJV 2. NKJV 3. ESV 4. NIV 5. NLT

@Taylor422

2 ай бұрын

I like my CSB :)

Tiff, excellent work and extremely informative- as is your tremendous passion to inform us. Praise God for your teachings and instruction. May God continue to watch over you and your ministry. A question remains: What equivalent standards for Spanish-speaking people? How can we know ? I need to know which Translation to give my Spanish-speaking friends.

So glad I found ur channel today! Looking forward to hearing & learning more from you. I was trying to learn the difference in these Bibles …. Thank you So MUCH!!! Now I know what Bibles I want next…

I will say this to you brother Tif, you're a trusted voice! All praise and glory to Jesus Christ our LORD!! AMEN

Man of God you're a blessing to me I have been following your channel just 3days ago, it's impacting my life

I was so encouraged and informed by this video. While I grew up with KJV , I have always used the NASB all my adult life and was encouraged to hear again that it is considered the most accurate translation. My Bible Lit professor insisted on its use. I became comfortable with it. To me it is readable but that may be because I could use KJV comfortably. I have considered using some of the more modern translations due to certain study bibles being available in translations other than NASB. This teaching made me more at ease with trying some of the other translations so that I could use other study bibles sold currently. I appreciate your clear and informative presentation. Thank you.

Thank you so much❣️ You are an answer to prayer regarding the Bible translations❣️✨🕊Praying for you and your ministry❣️

Very helpful information!

Based on your recommendation I picked up a new Bible. I found the perfect one for me and consider it a precious gift to myself. I also bought a large notebook, colorful pens, and started a serious study of the Bible....unhindered by denominational prejudice. Thank you and my God bless your efforts. ❤

thanks so much for the truth you teach,every blessing.

Thank you for a most informative, helpful discussion of the 5 most accurately translated versions of the Holy Bible. I am pleased to say that God has blessed me with at least one of each on your list. When He comes for me, I have a number of new copies that I am praying He will direct into the hands of someone who will use them. I just recently became acquainted with your KZread channel and enjoy your messages. God bless and keep you!

God Bless. Thank you for sharing the message of Salvation in Jesus Christ our Lord. I read the Bible daily and generally read five translations; of which, the ones you mentioned are typical. May the Lord continue to bless you and your work.

Great teaching!

I just love to hear you preach and teach the truth. Your are trustworthy and kind and accurate. I appreciate you so much. Blessing.

I click Ev. Tiff’s videos and immediately hit the thumbs up bc I already know it’s going to be good. 🔥🔥

@josevalverde7431

10 ай бұрын

I love my King James Bible.

So glad I found you Sir. You are a blessing and bring much edification. The Lord bless you and keep you.

Thank you I enjoyed Blessings from Fitzgerald Georgia

Thank you Tiff. Would you kindly help me understand the comment I overheard recently that time will accelarate in the end times? I am not sure if this is a biblical truth, if you can perhaps point out any sermon of yours that can give me clarity? I prefer to not listen to all sermons I come accross on Utube, so I prefer your answer based on the Bible. Many thanks and GOd bless.

Thank you, Pastor Tiff🌹⭐🌹

Thank you, Good Teacher!

@SoulPoetryandOtherWorks

Ай бұрын

"Why do you call him good? No one is good but God alone." Sorry, you just reminded me of this quotation. Adapted with the third person pronoun.

This was excellent excellent excellent! I posted it on my FB and sent it to all my Christian Friends. Thank you and bless you. I love all the details.

Thanks for the study on the 5 Translations we should avoid & 5 Most accurate Translation of the Bible. Sir, what do you say about Amplified Bible?

Great job on explaining the (5) translations. I actually was lead to these translations by the Holy Spirit and your teaching confirmed what I have. Thanks again Great Job!👍

God Bless you sir!! Love you and thank you for your amazing walk with our lord! You are truly someone to look up to and follow in the faith!!

Good content thank you

I agree. Thanks for the recommendations.

@dantombs5697

8 ай бұрын

Bob this is not a great video on the subject. It's slanted one-sided and is not providing you with very much truth. My recommendation would be to get yourself a king James Bible and compare it with every other one that's out there.

God bless you Pastor Tiff. Thank you 🙏🙏🙏

Thanks for the video.I used to attend a church where I was told that if you had any version other then the KJV you didn't have a Bible all you had was a book.

Hello Mr. Shuttlesworth thanks for all your informative videos, question do you have a particular commentary you use? I use Moody. I feel for me it’s the easiest to understand but I want to make sure it’s accurate and reliable. What do you prefer? Thanks again and God bless you and your family.

@sydney.g.sloangammagee8181

18 күн бұрын

He mentioned his first Bible being a Scofield - I believe Moody & J.Vernon McGee both also used that one as well as Billy Graham. I only responded to you cause you've gotten no answer in 5 months, sorry!!! But to check this, can go to Christian Books site, search the book & click to view, look for the list of contributors on a revised edition of it.

Excellent truth so richly delivered. Thank you. God Bless you and yours. 🔥💛🔥Sweet dreams 'til sunbeams find you.

Tiff Shuttleworth, I am very critical of evangelists on media, but I recently found 3 of your videos, and I am glad I took a chance and listened. Thank you for taking the time to be thorough in your teachings. I have always been afraid to read other translations because I don't want to accidently read a bad translation or the Jehovahs Witness book. This video and your video about 5 Bad Translations have been a lot of help. Thank you

Thank you, bro Tiff....my husband and I am looking for a new, large print bible now that we are older and this is so helpful.

Thank you 🙏🏼 Amen

Thank you. I have been in a "KJV Only" dilemma for YEARS now and this was the conclusion I came to over the past few months. It's nice to see that sound Biblical logic prevailed in me.

@madieaugust2081

10 ай бұрын

Amen to Adonai Elohim Elohim

@openlybookish

9 ай бұрын

I'm in this quandary still....😭

@ejlavey6329

9 ай бұрын

@@openlybookish I decided to stick with the KJV. It's best to be conservative in Scriptural interpretation. I certainly don't begrudge those who read other translations.

@toddtomasella7707

6 ай бұрын

- Psalms 12:6-7 is key. God is not confused and did not drop the ball (1 Corinthians 14:33). It's not about the mere translations but the underlying manuscript. Beware: Take a look in your "bible" for these 3 verses. Compare: Matthew 17:21 was removed, Romans 8:1 was chopped in half, and The blood of Jesus was removed from Colossians 1:14.

@michaelsburger665

6 ай бұрын

true if you read the KJV the Holy spirit is your school teacher not man kind, the Holy Spirit will confirm the word in your heart stay with the KJV

I thank you for your presentation and prayers. I do agree with the basis for the categorization of the Bible versions. Please in category would you place both the New Amplified and Amplified Versions (NAMP and AMP). Thank you and have a Christ Centered Day. Amen.

Never heard of you but absolutely love your nonsense approach of communicating the Gospel and the importance of reading scripture. Looking forward to listening to more of your teachings on here. Thank you!

@lesdavies6846

8 ай бұрын

Hahaha.....! 🤔😐

Please don't discount the use for people who have been in church all their lives to also enjoy the NLT. I've been in church since I was born, but I was finally able to read the Bible for myself (I'm dyslexic) when I purchased an NLT because it wasn't as much work for me to process. I also now own an ESV for word studies, but for general reading (until I'm able to build up my skills) I pull my beloved NLT ❤

For those of you who use the KJV version do you use? 1611, 1629, 1638, 1762, or 1769?

I did watch the versions avoid and can relate when at certain times they only ones currently available and didn't really like them and just felt a little off !!! I really love and appreciate this video !!!

The Douay-Rheims Vulgate and the 1611 KJV have the most ancient and accurate translations of the Bible, and both contain the entire 72 books of both Old and New Testaments that were in the original Bible which was completed in the year 397 a.d. It took over 300 years, and generations of scholars going over thousands of documents, to decide which of the documents were inspired writings. So I can't see how scholars today can claim to have more information than the ancients who lived closer to the time they were written. Besides, so many modern translations and interpretations are causing the confusion we are seeing now.

@sydney.g.sloangammagee8181

18 күн бұрын

I am sorry to respond to this comment from 5 months ago . . . Tiff explained in great detail about Dead Sea Scrolls filling in information from blank spots in the making of NASB back in the 60's & revised in 1995 . . . then these other translations, etc. SO . . . pertaining to KJV, were these blank spots ever filled in as a revised KJV, other than getting rid of "doth thau" , thee & thou, etc. type of phrases? Or was it left completely alone so that the revision IS the NKJV? This has always confused me, cause I love NJKV & don't see it as being like KJV very much at all, just without the old English words . . . I would expect to lay the 2 versions along side of one another & they should be word for word except old English word replaced with new word, "brethren" to "brothers" or perhaps "Where for art thou?" changed to "Where are you?" - am I making any sense in how I'm asking what I mean?

@edithhewson7208

8 күн бұрын

You should compare Genesis 3:15 you notice the KJV and Volgate don't agree

Years back I had emailed Ohio State, Notre Dame and Texas Christian asking what translation was the most accurate. All three answered the same way…the NRSV.

Matthew 9:13 please tell me why "repentance" was left out of several translations. Thank you!

@gloriaguerra3528

10 ай бұрын

I would like to answer that! Is done on purpose Martin Luther was a Catholic prist and a Jew hatter, list of the people that translated the bible where mist definitely antisemitism, this guy is not even telling you that all this is done on purpose.

So glad to have heard you here. I Love the spirit of the KJV & NKJV. I have not found this in the American or the NIV.

@frankalvareziii8289

9 ай бұрын

NIV Departure from true translation, it makes sense. Sorry I find it in error so many times, trying to tickle the ears of nations instead of firm solid truth. Avoid it.

I am very fortunate to have the King James Version/ New King James Version parallel Bible. For some reason it appears to be extremely difficult to obtain!

i've read every bible you mentioned cover to cover with the exception of the NASB. i recently bought a CSB which i'm only 2 books in but i'm liking it. i was between the CSB & the NLT. for no particular reason i chose the CSB. NLT will be next.

Praise the Lord. Thx Is Easy to read version (ETV) a good translation?

@dan8221

11 күн бұрын

Bishop Dag Heyward Mills (great Evangelist) reads from the ERV. It's good

I have learned so much from watching you on KZread but would love to have your DVD on being a real Christian

Thank you for presenting your arguments in concise, logical terms. I use multiple translations in my Bible studies, and believe Christians should not use just one translation. I have great respect for the NASB, KJV, NKJV and the ESV. I use the ESV as my primary Bible, however I particularly like the NKJV for Old Testament studies. I'm not a huge fan of the NLTV, however I do believe you get the true Word of God from it. I would be comfortable with anyone using any of the five versions you mention.

@michaelsburger665

6 ай бұрын

sorry only the KJV will be the correct bible, read the following we as Christians know that Jesus is the Son of God, can anyone deny this fact, no, Jesus is God's Son, now you call out the NKJB precise translation, sorry you are wrong then why do the NKJV and the NIV state the following that Jesus is God' servant NKJB Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. Acts 3:26 To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities." NIV Acts 3:13 The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. Acts 3:26 When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.” the following bibles are corrupt NIV, NKJV, NRS,NC, ESV, NAS, RS, LB, GNB, RV

@Ds-yx3on

5 ай бұрын

What do you have to say about his comment? Watch 13:27 I can see what he says. I have KJV which I stop reading as a kid bc I had a hard time following. NIV which makes it earlier for my kids to read. But my church uses the ESV and I have been reading it over any other Bibles???

What are your thoughts on the NIV, the New International Version? I do not like it, as it omits wording and therefore iwmportant aspects of biblical truths in certain texts. I noticed it was not on your 10 versuons not to read.. Thank you for your teachings. You are the clearest and most easy to listen to teacher i have heard. 🙌🙏🌈

i just found your channel, that you so much for this video, everyone tells me the only true bible in KJV, and gets upset with me because i read another version.

I have not yet listened to your teaching but before doing so would want to know which one of the translations is the truth... absolute truth. You must understand that only absolute truth is good enough.

Blessed by this information! Thank you! I’m a believer and also started with KJV and I still love it even though I read some of the ones you listed. God bless you richly and your family 😊hallelujah Jesus is my Lord

@michaelsburger665

6 ай бұрын

Stay with the King James Version please it is the only one

I bought a new bible today NLT which im.loveing as i love the word of god thank you pastor tiff you are a blessing ❤ god bless you and yours

An additional thought: I too find it useful to compare translations. If something strikes me I read in my NASB I use my KJV digital Strongs to compare how ideas are rendered to make certain I am understanding the truth behind what I am reading. I do have a NIV and although it is not my first choice I do find I receive new insights from verses I feel I know very well.

Lovely Quintel you have.

Thank you for your teaching. My question: Was Shakespeare one of the translators of the King James Bible?

@rajnandantorontostreets3329

3 ай бұрын

No

I’m surprised you didn’t include the Legacy Standard Bible. The refinements to the NASB text have produced the most literally accurate English Bible.

Thankyou Tif. I began in early 1967 with the King James, and thanks to the Navigators and two years in the Army l memorized about 300 verses. Upon leaving the Army I bought the NASB, which is my steady Bible, but I continue to memorize in the King James. I also have the NIV. I really like reading my Phiillips paraphrase.

@dantombs5697

8 ай бұрын

NASB can't even get who killed goliath right in second Samuel 21:19!!!

@fnjesusfreak

8 ай бұрын

@@dantombs5697 That's actually a source issue; it's accurately translating the text it's based off. KJV actually emended the text to fix it, as noted by the italics (the Hebrew of 1 and 2 Samuel is known to be problematic). A few letters got garbled in transmission, basically. I actually proposed this conjectural emendation of 2 Sm 21.19: "And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jair slew Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear [was] like a weaver's beam." This doesn't require much tweaking of the Hebrew and jives it readily with 1 Ch 20.5. I think an honest translation should make this emendation, and add a note explaining it.

@dantombs5697

8 ай бұрын

@@fnjesusfreak Great job! I love that you search the scriptures out to find an answer. So what do you think about this. Does the inspired word of God contain these verses? Matthew 17:21 Matthew 18:11 Matthew 23:14 Mark 7:16 Mark 9:44 and 9:46 Mark 11:26 Mark 15:28 Luke 17:36 John 5:4 Acts 8:37 Acts 15:34 Acts 24:6-8 Acts 28:29 Romans 16:24

@fnjesusfreak

8 ай бұрын

@@dantombs5697 My usual answer is nuanced, so keep this in mind. You're going to get a long explanation; I have highlighted the answer in bold. Most people tend to prefer the shorter or stranger reading as more original, while I tend to consider them likely corruptions. The result is that while my preferred Vorlage is not exactly the same as the so-called received text, it is closer to that than to other text types, including Robinson-Pierpont (I have a copy of their Greek NT, though my ability to utilize it is limited). In many cases, these verses are still present elsewhere, so removing them does not actually harm the message; however, there are a few places, like Mt 17.21, where some damage very much is done to the context. Also, John 5.4, if missing, ruins the entire context of the passage, and Acts 8.37 is a vital soteriological text. Other passages that jar me when not found in modern translations are Matthew 6.13b and 16.2-3. *My preferred text contains all of the above* and furthermore has a longer text of Acts 15.34 ("But Silas saw fit to remain; and Judas departed to Jerusalem alone.") as well as a couple verses in Jude. (Note that the KJV actually contains a marginal note that even their manuscripts did not consistently contain Luke 17.36!)

I am suprised that the current edition of the NIV made the list since the new 2011 edition combined the TNIV into the NIV text and is now a gender-neutral bible like the CEV. Outstanding video by the way.

Your opinion is highly regarded, thank you! B/a 1959--age 93. God Bless!

When we notice that some Bibles do not have a certain verse while others do, is it true that the discrepancy is always because of an addition and not because of a redaction? Did the one that have the "addition" come first? If so might that account for why we see some Bibles with a number instead of a verse? Some Bibles do supply a number, but no verse is given.

It is refreshing to here u u don't talk down to others u are sincere and learned good job though I am not a Christian u almost persuade 😊

Is there anything to what some say about copyrights such that to get one, it must be at least 10% different, and there are only so many ways one can say something 10% different without telling it like it isn't? Is there anything to that when we are talking about printing and selling Bibles, and all the versions we have today?

Break a leg meant good luck for an actor meaning the actor would be in a cast or getting the part in the play

Thank you.

Thank you

Thanks a lot. But can you explain why there is a big difference in the verse Romans 8:1 in King James as compared to the other translations (NIV, NLT etc)? While the King James and New King James are saying there is no condemnation for believers who walk in the spirit, the others are quiet abut how you live suggesting that it doesn’t matter how you live.

I’m finding it difficult to believe this isn’t Wayne Rogers!

I mean this with absolutely sincerity, how about asking Jesus to lead us to the translation he would have us read .

I am battling to read the NKJ Version .I read the old one and comes easier to me ,but I will try .Please pray that God will reviel His Word to me .Thank you for your diligents ho God .Amen

I was introduced to Joyce Meyer bible when came to be Christian. I now read kjv. What about nkjv, I've seen discrepancies in it?

@richardbarry04553

10 ай бұрын

There are problems with the nkjv - two that come to mind are Matthew 7:14 and 2 Timothy 2:15. Those are two major discrepancies that come to mind. The nkjv changes “narrow is the way” to “difficult is the way” which really changes the meaning of Matthew 7:14. And it changes “study” to “be diligent” in 2 Timothy 2:15. There are lots of other problems with the nkjv but I can’t think of them right now. I stick with my King James which the Lord led me to when I was saved in 2021 and which I’ve read completely multiple times now.

Why are only manuscrrips that form 66 books in the Bible are used and others known as Apocrypha not included ?

Actually is a thought for thought translation accurate? Doesn't it depend on the translators thoughts? Wouldn't word for word be more accurate?

Thank you brother Tiff, I sure will get the NLT, I do have the KJ and NKJ, American Standard and NIV. Amen.. I did get rid of the JW bible and the Message bible.

What is the advantage of having 5 translations of the Holy Bible? I'm happy and blessed to have been gifted with a KJV Bible by my father when I was just a teen and started reading the NT then the whole Bible. Through it I found Jesus and have no problems with it being written in the old English language.

@kafizola5695

10 ай бұрын

For clarity.

@chadboxford3589

9 ай бұрын

That's great you found Jesus in reading the KJB. There has been some improvement over a few scriptures that were missleading, Exodus 20:13 and Luke 14:26. The new translations clear those up.😊

Thank you, Pastor. You answered some questions I’ve had about my Bible translations. God bless you, your family and your ministry!

I would love a link to the message referred to at 45:43....Dr Billy Graham's last message from his rocking chair on his front porch with a billion people around the world listening. It's gotta to be extra special!!

Oh, this is the "God only made wine that can't get you drunk" guy.

My husband loves the Amplified Bible but I find it way too “ wordy”. A lot of parentheses used to further explain what came before it). Would be difficult to memorize a verses like that

Have you neglected the ASV 1901?

Why is John 15: especially the english woard translated from the greek AIRO bear fruit?causing people to believe people would lose their salvation if they do not bear fruit? Or is that right?

I think there are also a risk of bias in tought by tought and dynamic equvalent ....

Thanyou for this explanation. I try to stick to the most original translations in English as well as my home language but, why take almost an hour to explain this?

About Matthew 18:11, addition or redaction? Does anyone know for sure? Can it be proven either way? I would like to know. I like the KJV. It's just that I'm not one of those KJV only people. However I did order Riplinger's book. I don't know what I will be getting into. I really don't.

This "Elizabethian English" ,is that the normal way they used to talk back during the time of the printing of the King James Bible? Or did they add the " thees " and " thous " to make that Bible sound more holy ?

Pastor Tiff, what do you say to someone that argues that they don't believe in everything the Bible says because not everything in the Bible has been translated correctly?

@TiffShuttlesworth

5 ай бұрын

The true modern translations are accurate.

I remember hearing people say back 40 plus years ago, that the KJV and the Geneva are good Bibles and that there were some crazy things going on with the new Bibles. At the time I remember that the Good News For Modern Man Bible was something some people wanted and liked. Then today I found a channel on you tube where it was said that if you find a Bible version that doesn't have Matthew 18:11, those are the ones to avoid. Apparently there is some sort of "family" or strain, or line of Bibles that have some common manuscripts or something about them that we should avoid. Is there any truth to that?

@fnjesusfreak

8 ай бұрын

Prolly someone who follows Peter Ruckman or Gail Anne "God And" Riplinger.

King James the sixth of Scotland, became King James the first of England, and called it the "United Kingdom". King James promised to spend equal time in both countries, however, that never took place; Scotland as usual took back seat. Nevertheless, he did gather the scholars who gave the World, the "King James" version of the Holy Bible. I was born and raised in Scotland; however, I am thankful to have been a United States citizen for the greater part of my life.

What about the WEB (World English Bible), and MLV (Modern Literal Version),there’s Critical Text and Textus Receptus Bibles in the list but no Majority Texts bibles

If someone was translating and came to words that translated to "break a leg", and if that's what it naturally translated to, I would want that translation in whatever it was that I am reading, along with a note in a margin saying "this expression was used as a way of wishing someone would do well, exact origin unknown", or something like that. It's like when I'm watching an old movie. I don't want somebody changing the words that one of the actors said. I would want it left as it was. However, if there was an introductory mentor who is introducing us to the movie, I would like an explanation from him, a comment from him that would be of help to us, if he could do that. I believe that would be appropriate. If anyone thinks that would not be a good idea, then maybe there is something lacking in their understanding. Would somebody be so wrong to say that the movie was somewhat corrupted because somebody did change the audio on that old movie, and explain why they say that, or would they be speaking on a level they are not qualified to speak on? Who is it that says what is qualified or not? Who is it that created us? What if somebody says that old movie is 100% original without any external changes? Would they be right or would they be wrong, if somebody did change the audio to "help" us? If someone say, "Well that's not entirely true. The movie was indeed altered later. Something was removed from the audio and something else was inserted, and let me tell you why they did that..." If they offered a truthful and complete explanation and it did indeed help us, did they do us a disservice by saying so? I don't think so. I'm not for extremism. I'm just sayin'. I'm not saying that word for word formalism is the way to go without exception.

What's your source of who were the translators of the King James Bible?